Identification of a specific isoform of tomato lipoxygenase (TomloxC) involved in the generation of fatty acid-derived flavor compounds

There are at least five lipoxygenases (TomloxA, TomloxB, TomloxC, TomloxD, and TomloxE) present in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit, but their role in generation of fruit flavor volatiles has been unclear. To assess the physiological role of TomloxC in the generation of volatile C6 aldehyde and alcohol flavor compounds, we produced transgenic tomato plants with greatly reduced TomloxC using sense and antisense constructs under control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. The expression level of the TomloxC mRNA in some transgenic plants was selectively reduced by gene silencing or antisense inhibition to between 1% and 5% of the wild-type controls, but the expression levels of mRNAs for the four other isoforms were unaffected. The specific depletion of TomloxC in transgenic tomatoes led to a marked reduction in the levels of known flavor volatiles, including hexanal, hexenal, and hexenol, to as little as 1.5% of those of wild-type controls following maceration of ripening fruit. Addition of linoleic or linolenic acid to fruit homogenates significantly increased the levels of flavor volatiles, but the increase with the TomloxC-depleted transgenic fruit extracts was much lower than with the wild-type control. Confocal imaging of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaf cells expressing a TomloxC-GFP fusion confirmed a chloroplast localization of the protein. Together, these results suggest that TomloxC is a chloroplast-targeted lipoxygenase isoform that can use both linoleic and linolenic acids as substrates to generate volatile C6 flavor compounds. The roles of the other lipoxygenase isoforms are discussed.     

The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies

Species are defined using a variety of different operational techniques. While discussion of the various methodologies has previously been restricted mostly to taxonomists, the demarcation of species is also crucial for conservation biology. Unfortunately, different methods of diagnosing species can arrive at different entities. Most prominently, it is widely thought that use of a phylogenetic species concept may lead to recognition of a far greater number of much less inclusive units. As a result, studies of the same group of organisms can produce not only different species identities but also different species range and number of individuals. To assess the impact of different definitions on conservation issues, we collected instances from the literature where a group of organisms was categorized both under phylogenetic and nonphylogenetic concepts. Our results show a marked difference, with surveys based on a phylogenetic species concept showing more species (48%) and an associated decrease in population size and range. We discuss the serious consequences of this trend for conservation, including an apparent change in the number of endangered species, potential political fallout, and the difficulty of deciding what should be conserved.     

Highly potent and long-acting trimeric and tetrameric inhibitors of influenza virus neuraminidase

A set of trimeric and tetrameric derivatives 6-11 of the influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir 1 have been synthesized by coupling a common monomeric zanamivir derivative 3 onto various multimeric carboxylic acid core groups. These discrete multimeric compounds are all significantly more antiviral than zanamivir and also show outstanding long-lasting protective activity when tested in mouse influenza infectivity experiments.     

The gene ontology categorizer

The Gene Ontology Categorizer, developed jointly by the Los Alamos National Laboratory and Procter & Gamble Corp., provides a capability for the categorization task in the Gene Ontology (GO): given a list of genes of interest, what are the best nodes of the GO to summarize or categorize that list? The motivating question is from a drug discovery process, where after some gene expression analysis experiment, we wish to understand the overall effect of some cell treatment or condition by identifying 'where' in the GO the differentially expressed genes fall: 'clustered' together in one place? in two places? uniformly spread throughout the GO? 'high', or 'low'? In order to address this need, we view bio-ontologies more as combinatorially structured databases than facilities for logical inference, and draw on the discrete mathematics of finite partially ordered sets (posets) to develop data representation and algorithms appropriate for the GO. In doing so, we have laid the foundations for a general set of methods to address not just the categorization task, but also other tasks (e.g. distances in ontologies and ontology merger and exchange) in both the GO and other bio-ontologies (such as the Enzyme Commission database or the MEdical Subject Headings) cast as hierarchically structured taxonomic knowledge systems.     

The value of biodiversity experiments

Recent biodiversity experiments have investigated the relationship between diversity and ecosystem functioning by synthesizing plant communities from pools of species that have been experimentally manipulated to vary numbers and types of species present while holding abiotic factors constant. Biodiversity experiments therefore focus on a previously under-explored aspect of global change: the feedback from diversity to environment. Consequences of random manipulation of species communities may not correspond well to those of specific extinction sequences observed in the past in response to extinction drivers that cause highly non-random loss. However, random manipulation provides a good starting point given that existing communities could undergo many alternative orders of species loss in the future in response to a variety of different potential extinction drivers. Further, the effects of some extinction drivers are currently poorly understood and therefore difficult to predict (e.g. climate change) and it may be premature to dismiss the predictions of random scenarios as irrelevant to all real examples of species loss. The first generations of biodiversity experiments have provided valuable, and sometimes unexpected, discoveries about the general nature of the relationship between diversity and ecosystem functioning. These discoveries could not have been made using observational studies. We propose that different examples of extinction loss in the real or a potential future world form a continuum from situations where the results of the first-generation biodiversity experiments will be highly relevant to less relevant. At the one extreme are examples where the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning will be overwhelmed by direct effects of the extinction driver on processes (e.g. chronic eutrophication). At the other extreme are situations where ecosystem processes are not strongly affected by direct effects of the extinction driver and where the effects of species loss on functioning may be more important (e.g. habitat fragmentation). Given the unprecedented uncertainty about the future of biodiversity and the functioning of ecosystems, a general approach with randomly varying species pools was the right place to start in order to provide a general foundation. The new challenge is to test for effects of biodiversity on functioning in real-world examples of species loss.

Zusammenfassung

Biodiversitätsversuche zeichnen sich dadurch aus, dass natürliche Artenpools experimentell reduziert werden und anschließend der Zusammenhang zwischen der Artenzahl und Ökosystemfunktionen unter konstanten abiotischen Umweltbedingungen untersucht wird. Dadurch unterscheiden sich Biodiversitätsexperimente grundsätzlich von anderen Versuchen, die die Biodiversität als Zielvariable behandeln und stattdessen die abiotische Umwelt manipulieren. Die Auswahl der Arten für die reduzierten Artenpools in Biodiversitätsexperimenten erfolgte bisher meist zufällig, während natürliche Aussterbefaktoren wie Eutrophierung nicht alle Arten gleichermassen gefährden. Für verschiedene Aussterbefaktoren ist aber so wenig bekannt, dass ein zufälliges Aussterbeszenario die beste gegenwärtig verfügbare Option ist. Dies trifft insbesondere für mögliche zukünftige Aussterbeprozesse zu, die durch globale Umweltveränderungen (Klima, biologische Invasionen) oder Habitatsfragmentierung ausgelöst werden könnten. Die erste Generation von Biodiversitätsexperimenten mit zufälligen Aussterbeszenarien hat wertvolle, teilweise unerwartete, generelle Zusammenhänge zwischen Artenzahl und Ökosystemfunktionen aufgedeckt. Diese Zusammenhänge ließen sich durch vergleichende Studien nicht erkennen. In Zukunft sollten Biodiversitätsexperimente dennoch vermehrt Aussterbeszenarien simulieren, die in der realen Umwelt mit größter Wahrscheinlichkeit auftreten.     

Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon

The high level of escapes from Atlantic salmon farms, up to two million fishes per year in the North Atlantic, has raised concern about the potential impact on wild populations. We report on a two-generation experiment examining the estimated lifetime successes, relative to wild natives, of farm, F(1) and F(2) hybrids and BC(1) backcrosses to wild and farm salmon. Offspring of farm and "hybrids" (i.e. all F(1), F(2) and BC(1) groups) showed reduced survival compared with wild salmon but grew faster as juveniles and displaced wild parr, which as a group were significantly smaller. Where suitable habitat for these emigrant parr is absent, this competition would result in reduced wild smolt production. In the experimental conditions, where emigrants survived downstream, the relative estimated lifetime success ranged from 2% (farm) to 89% (BC(1) wild) of that of wild salmon, indicating additive genetic variation for survival. Wild salmon primarily returned to fresh water after one sea winter (1SW) but farm and 'hybrids' produced proportionately more 2SW salmon. However, lower overall survival means that this would result in reduced recruitment despite increased 2SW fecundity. We thus demonstrate that interaction of farm with wild salmon results in lowered fitness, with repeated escapes causing cumulative fitness depression and potentially an extinction vortex in vulnerable populations.     

A soluble isoform of the rhesus monkey nonclassical MHC class I molecule Mamu-AG is expressed in the placenta and the testis

The nonclassical MHC class I locus HLA-G is expressed primarily in the placenta, although other sites of expression have been noted in normal and pathological situations. In addition, soluble HLA-G isoforms have been detected in the serum of pregnant and nonpregnant women as well as men. The rhesus monkey placenta expresses a novel nonclassical MHC class I molecule Mamu-AG, which has features remarkably similar to those of HLA-G. We determined that the rhesus placenta expresses Mamu-AG mRNA (Mamu-AG5), retaining intron 4 as previously noted in HLA-G5. Immunostaining experiments with Ab 16G1 against the soluble HLA-G5 intron 4 peptide demonstrated that an immunoreactive protein(s) was present in the syncytiotrophoblasts of the chorionic villi of the rhesus placenta, within villous cytotrophoblasts, and occasionally within cells of the villous stroma. The Mamu-AG5 mRNA was readily detected in rhesus testis (although not in ejaculated sperm). Whereas an Ab against membrane-bound Mamu-AG stained few cells, primarily in the interstitium of the testis, there was consistent immunostaining for Mamu-AG5 in cells within the seminiferous tubules, which was corroborated by localization of Mamu-AG mRNA by in situ hybridization. While primary spermatocytes were negative, Sertoli cells, spermatocytes, and spermatids were consistently positive for 16G1 immunostaining. The specific recognition of the soluble Mamu-AG isoform was confirmed by Western blotting of Mamu-AG5 expressed in heterologous cells. The results demonstrate that a soluble nonclassical MHC class I molecule is expressed in the rhesus monkey placenta and testis, and confirm and extend the unique homology between HLA-G and the rhesus nonclassical molecule Mamu-AG.     

Prevalence of agglutinating antibodies to Sarcocystis neurona in skunks (Mephitis Mephitis), raccoons (Procyon lotor), and opossums (Didelphis Virginiana) from Connecticut

Equine protozoal myeloencephalitis is the most important protozoan disease of horses in North America and is usually caused by Sarcocystis neurona. Natural cases of encephalitis caused by S. neurona have been reported in skunks (Mephitis mephitis) and raccoons (Procyon lotor). Opossums (Didelphis spp.) are the only known definitive host. Sera from 24 striped skunks, 12 raccoons, and 7 opossums (D. virginiana) from Connecticut were examined for agglutinating antibodies to S. neurona using the S. neurona agglutination test (SAT) employing formalin-fixed merozoites as antigen. The SAT was validated for skunk sera using pre- and postinfection serum samples from 2 experimentally infected skunks. Of the 24 (46%) skunks 11 were positive, and all 12 raccoons were positive for S. neurona antibodies. None of the 7 opossums was positive for antibodies to S. neurona. These results suggest that exposure to sporocysts of S. neurona by intermediate hosts is high in Connecticut. The absence of antibodies in opossums collected from the same areas is most likely because of the absence of systemic infection in the definitive host.     

Exogenous growth factors induce the production of ganglion cells at the retinal margin

Neural progenitors at the retinal margin of the post-hatch chicken normally produce amacrine and bipolar cells, but not photoreceptor or ganglion cells. The purpose of this study was to test whether exogenous growth factors influence the types of cells produced by progenitors at the retinal margin. We injected insulin, FGF2 or a combination of insulin and FGF2 into the vitreous chamber of post-hatch chickens. To assay for growth factor-induced changes at the retinal margin, we used in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry on cryosections. One day after the final injection, we found that insulin alone stimulated the addition of cells to the retinal margin, but this was not further increased when FGF2 was applied with insulin. Insulin alone increased the number of cells in the progenitor zone that expressed neurofilament, and this was further increased when FGF2 was applied with insulin. These neurofilament-expressing cells in the progenitor zone included differentiating neurons that expressed Islet1 or Hu. Four days after the final dose of growth factor, we found that the production of ganglion cells was induced by co-injection of insulin and FGF2, but not by either insulin or FGF2 alone. We conclude that the types of cells produced by progenitors at the retinal margin can be altered by exogenous growth factors and that normally the microenvironment imposes limitations on the types of neurons produced.