Differential Mechanisms of Shedding of the Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored NKG2D Ligands

Tumor cells release NKG2D ligands to evade NKG2D-mediated immune surveillance. The purpose of our investigation was to explore the cellular mechanisms of release used by various members of the ULBP family. Using biochemical and cellular approaches in both transfectant systems and tumor cell lines, this paper shows that ULBP1, ULBP2, and ULBP3 are released from cells with different kinetics and by distinct mechanisms. Whereas ULBP2 is mainly shed by metalloproteases, ULBP3 is abundantly released as part of membrane vesicles known as exosomes. Interestingly, exosomal ULBP3 protein is much more potent for down-modulation of the NKG2D receptor than soluble ULBP2 protein. This is the first report showing functionally relevant differences in the biochemistry of the three members of the ULBP family and confirms that in depth study of the biochemical features of individual NKG2D ligands will be necessary to understand and manipulate the biology of these proteins for therapy.     

Glucose-induced Ubiquitylation and Endocytosis of the Yeast Jen1 Transporter: ROLE OF LYSINE 63-LINKED UBIQUITIN CHAINS*

Protein ubiquitylation is essential for many events linked to intracellular protein trafficking. Despite the significance of this process, the molecular mechanisms that govern the regulation of ubiquitylation remain largely unknown. Plasma membrane transporters are subjected to tightly regulated endocytosis, and ubiquitylation is a key signal at several stages of the endocytic pathway. The yeast monocarboxylate transporter Jen1 displays glucose-regulated endocytosis. We show here that casein kinase 1-dependent phosphorylation and HECT-ubiquitin ligase Rsp5-dependent ubiquitylation are required for Jen1 endocytosis. Ubiquitylation and endocytosis of Jen1 are induced within minutes in response to glucose addition. Jen1 is modified at the cell surface by oligo-ubiquitylation with ubiquitin-Lys⁶³ linked chain(s), and Jen1-Lys³³⁸ is one of the target residues. Ubiquitin-Lys⁶³-linked chain(s) are also required directly or indirectly to sort Jen1 into multivesicular bodies. Jen1 is one of the few examples for which ubiquitin-Lys⁶³-linked chain(s) was shown to be required for correct trafficking at two stages of endocytosis: endocytic internalization and sorting at multivesicular bodies.Ubiquitylation is one of the most prevalent protein post-translational modifications in eukaryotes. In addition to its role in promoting proteasomal degradation of target proteins, ubiquitylation has been shown to regulate multiple processes, including DNA repair, signaling, and intracellular trafficking. Ubiquitylation serves as a key signal mediating the internalization of plasma membrane receptors and transporters, followed by their intracellular transport and subsequent recycling or lysosomal/vacuolar degradation (1, 2). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, transporters usually display both constitutive and accelerated endocytosis regulated by factors such as excess substrate, changes in nutrient availability, and stress conditions. Ubiquitylation of these cell surface proteins acts as a signal triggering their internalization (1). A single essential E3⁴ ubiquitin ligase, Rsp5, has been implicated in the internalization of most, if not all, endocytosed proteins (3). Rsp5 is the unique member in S. cerevisiae of the HECT (homologous to E6AP COOH terminus)-ubiquitin ligases of the Nedd4/Rsp5 family (4). In a few cases, Rsp5-dependent cell surface ubiquitylation was shown to involve PY-containing adapters that bind to Rsp5 (5–7). Rsp5-mediated ubiquitylation is also required for sorting into multivesicular bodies (MVBs) of endosomal membrane proteins that come from either the plasma membrane (through endocytosis) or the Golgi (through vacuolar protein sorting (VPS) pathway) (8). Although much progress has been made in elucidating the mechanistic basis of various steps in protein trafficking, the precise requirement for a specific type and length of Ub chains at various stages of the endocytic pathway remains to be addressed.The ubiquitin profile needed for proper internalization has been established for some yeast membrane proteins (1). The α-factor receptor Ste2 was described as undergoing monoubiquitylation on several lysines (multimonoubiquitylation). The a-factor receptor, Ste3p; the general transporter of amino acids, Gap1; the zinc transporter, Ztr1; and the uracil transporter, Fur4, have been shown to be modified by short chains of two to three ubiquitins, each attached to one, two, or more target lysine residues (oligo-ubiquitylation). Among them, Fur4 and Gap1 were the only transporters demonstrated to undergo plasma membrane oligo-ubiquitylation with ubiquitin residues linked via ubiquitin-Lys⁶³ (9, 10). In addition, the two siderophore transporters Arn1 and Sit1 were also shown to undergo Lys⁶³-linked cell surface ubiquitylation (11, 12). Whether these four transporters are representative of a larger class of plasma membrane substrates remains to be determined. Little is known about the type of ubiquitylation involved and/or required for sorting to MVBs. Some MVB cargoes appear to undergo monoubiquitylation (8), whereas Sna3, an MVB cargo of unknown function, undergoes Lys⁶³-linked ubiquitylation (13). Lys⁶³-linked ubiquitin chains were also recently reported to be required, directly or indirectly, for MVB sorting of the siderophore transporter, Sit1, when trafficking through the VPS pathway in the absence of its external substrate (11). In agreement with the possibility that additional membrane-bound proteins might undergo Lys⁶³-linked ubiquitylation, a proteomic study aiming to uncover ubiquitylated yeast proteins showed that Lys⁶³-ubiquitin chains are far more abundant than previously thought (14).The transport of monocarboxylates, such as lactate and pyruvate, as well as ketone bodies across the plasma membrane is essential for the metabolism of cells of various organisms. A family of monocarboxylate transporters has been reported that includes mainly mammalian members (15). In S. cerevisiae, two monocarboxylate-proton symporters have been described, Jen1 and Ady2 (16, 17). These transporters exhibit differences in their mechanisms of regulation and specificity. Jen1 is a lactate-pyruvate-acetate-propionate transporter induced in lactic or pyruvic acid-grown cells (18). Ady2, which accepts acetate, propionate, or formate, is present in cells grown in non-fermentable carbon sources (19). Jen1 has unique regulatory characteristics and has been extensively studied. It was the first secondary porter of S. cerevisiae characterized by heterologous expression in Pichia pastoris at both the cell and the membrane vesicle levels (20). The addition of glucose to lactic acid-grown cells very rapidly triggers loss of Jen1 activity and repression of JEN1 gene expression (21, 22). Newly synthesized Jen1-GFP fusion protein is sorted to the plasma membrane in an active and stable form, and loss of Jen1-GFP activity upon glucose addition is the result of its endocytosis followed by vacuolar degradation (23). Data from large scale analyses based on mass spectrometry approaches led to the detection of two sites of ubiquitylation for Jen1, one located in the N terminus of the protein and the second in the central loop (14), and several sites of phosphorylation in the N terminus, central loop, and C terminus of the protein (14, 24). In the present study, we aimed at further characterizing the internalization step of endocytosis of the transporter Jen1 and the potential role of the phosphorylation and ubiquitylation events required for its correct endocytic trafficking.     

Exploring the interactions of gliadins with model membranes: Effect of confined geometry and interfaces

Mechanisms leading to the assembly of wheat storage proteins into proteins bodies within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of endosperm cells are unresolved today. In this work, physical chemistry parameters which could be involved in these processes were explored. To model the confined environment of proteins within the ER, the dynamic behavior of γ‐gliadins inserted inside lyotropic lamellar phases was studied using FRAP experiments. The evolution of the diffusion coefficient as a function of the lamellar periodicity enabled to propose the hypothesis of an interaction between γ‐gliadins and membranes. This interaction was further studied with the help of phospholipid Langmuir monolayers. γ‐ and ω‐gliadins were injected under DMPC and DMPG monolayers and the two‐dimensional (2D) systems were studied by Brewster angle microscopy (BAM), polarization modulation infrared reflection‐absorption spectroscopy (PM‐IRRAS), and surface tension measurements. Results showed that both gliadins adsorbed under phospholipid monolayers, considered as biological membrane models, and formed micrometer‐sized domains at equilibrium. However, their thicknesses, probed by reflectance measurements, were different: ω‐gliadins aggregates displayed a constant thickness, consistent with a monolayer, while the thickness of γ‐gliadins aggregates increased with the quantity of protein injected. These different behaviors could find some explanations in the difference of aminoacid sequence distribution: an alternate repeated ‐ unrepeated domain within γ‐gliadin sequence, while one unique repeated domain was present within ω‐gliadin sequence. All these findings enabled to propose a model of gliadins self‐assembly via a membrane interface and to highlight the predominant role of wheat prolamin repeated domain in the membrane interaction. In the biological context, these results would mean that the repeated domain could be considered as an anchor for the interaction with the ER membrane and a nucleus point for the formation and growth of protein bodies within endosperm cells. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 91: 610–622, 2009. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com     

Proteomic and functional analysis of the mitotic Drosophila centrosome

Regulation of centrosome structure, duplication and segregation is integrated into cellular pathways that control cell cycle progression and growth. As part of these pathways, numerous proteins with well‐established non‐centrosomal localization and function associate with the centrosome to fulfill regulatory functions. In turn, classical centrosomal components take up functional and structural roles as part of other cellular organelles and compartments. Thus, although a comprehensive inventory of centrosome components is missing, emerging evidence indicates that its molecular composition reflects the complexity of its functions. We analysed the Drosophila embryonic centrosomal proteome using immunoisolation in combination with mass spectrometry. The 251 identified components were functionally characterized by RNA interference. Among those, a core group of 11 proteins was critical for centrosome structure maintenance. Depletion of any of these proteins in Drosophila SL2 cells resulted in centrosome disintegration, revealing a molecular dependency of centrosome structure on components of the protein translation machinery, actin‐ and RNA‐binding proteins. In total, we assigned novel centrosome‐related functions to 24 proteins and confirmed 13 of these in human cells.     

Hormone Action in the Mammary Gland

A woman’s breast cancer risk is affected by her reproductive history. The hormonal milieu also influences the course of the disease. The female reproductive hormones, estrogens, progesterone, and prolactin, have a major impact on breast cancer and control postnatal mammary gland development. Analysis of hormone receptor mutant mouse strains combined with tissue recombination techniques and proteomics revealed that sequential activation of hormone signaling in the mammary epithelium is required for progression of morphogenesis. Hormones impinge on a subset of luminal mammary epithelial cells (MECs) that express hormone receptors and act as sensor cells translating and amplifying systemic signals into local stimuli. Proliferation is induced by paracrine mechanisms mediated by distinct factors at different stages. Tissue and stage specificity of hormonal signaling is achieved at the molecular level by different chromatin contexts and differential recruitment of coactivators and corepressors.Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women and the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women. To better understand the genetic alterations responsible for breast cancer, it is critical to first understand the mechanisms regulating normal mammary gland development. Increased interest in the field has led to the identification of a large number of genes important for mammary gland development (reviewed in Tanos and Brisken 2008).A woman’s risk for breast cancer is linked to her reproductive history and with her lifetime hormonal exposure; hormones also influence the course of the disease. The same hormones that affect breast carcinogenesis control postnatal mammary gland development. The mouse mammary gland has been instrumental in providing new insights into the mechanisms by which hormones act in the mammary gland.A number of features make the mouse mammary gland a particularly attractive experimental system. Being the only organ that undergoes most of its development postnatally, it is particularly suited for studying developmental processes; it is readily amenable to experimental manipulation and can be easily accessed as it localizes to the underside of the ventral skin. Furthermore, mammary gland tissue is abundant; there are 5 pairs of mammary glands in mice, and cells can be isolated in large numbers. The versatile tools of mouse genetics can be combined with powerful tissue recombination techniques to generate chimeric glands, as we will illustrate in this article.     

Epigenetic repressor-like genes are differentially regulated during grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) development

Grapevine sexual reproduction involves a seasonal separation between inflorescence primordia (flowering induction) and flower development. We hypothesized that a repression mechanism implicating epigenetic changes could play a role in the seasonal separation of these two developmental processes in grapevine. Therefore, the expression of five grapevine genes with homology to the Arabidopsis epigenetic repressor genes FERTILIZATION INDEPENDENT ENDOSPERM (FIE), EMBRYONIC FLOWER 2 (EMF2), CURLY LEAF (CLF), MULTICOPY SUPPRESSOR OF IRA 1 (MSI1) and SWINGER (SWN) was analyzed during the development of buds and vegetative and reproductive organs. During bud development, the putative grapevine epigenetic repressor genes VvCLF, VvEMF2, VvMSI1, VvSWN and VvFIE are mainly expressed in latent buds at the flowering induction period, but also detected during bud burst and inflorescence/flower development. The overlapping expression patterns of grapevine PcG-like genes in buds suggest that chromatin remodeling mechanisms could be operating during grapevine bud development for controlling processes such as seasonal flowering, dormancy and bud burst. Furthermore, the expression of grapevine PcG-like genes was also detected in fruits and vegetative organs, suggesting that epigenetic changes could be at the basis of the regulation of various proliferation–differentiation cell transitions that occur during grapevine development.     

Development of fluorescent substrates for microsomal epoxide hydrolase and application to inhibition studies

The microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) plays a significant role in the metabolism of numerous xenobiotics. In addition, it has a potential role in sexual development and bile acid transport, and it is associated with a number of diseases such as emphysema, spontaneous abortion, eclampsia, and several forms of cancer. Toward developing chemical tools to study the biological role of mEH, we designed and synthesized a series of absorbent and fluorescent substrates. The highest activity for both rat and human mEH was obtained with the fluorescent substrate cyano(6-methoxy-naphthalen-2-yl)methyl glycidyl carbonate (11). An in vitro inhibition assay using this substrate ranked a series of known inhibitors similarly to the assay that used radioactive cis-stilbene oxide but with a greater discrimination between inhibitors. These results demonstrate that the new fluorescence-based assay is a useful tool for the discovery of structure–activity relationships among mEH inhibitors. Furthermore, this substrate could also be used for the screening chemical library with high accuracy and with a Z′ value of approximately 0.7. This new assay permits a significant decrease in labor and cost and also offers the advantage of a continuous readout. However, it should not be used with crude enzyme preparations due to interfering reactions.     

Characterization of ��/��- and ��-Gliadins in Commercial Varieties and Breeding Lines of Durum Wheat Using MALDI-TOF and A-PAGE Gels

In this work, gliadin composition has been analyzed in 33 accessions of durum wheat using MALDI-TOF MS and compared with A-PAGE results. The MALDI-TOF MS spectra were 29,900-42,500 Da, which corresponds to the α/β- and γ-gliadin regions in A-PAGE. The average of gliadin peaks per line was 23 for MALDI-TOF MS and only 14.8 bands for A-PAGE. MALDI-TOF MS identified 33 gliadin peaks in the durum wheat collection, 20 of which were unique peaks present in 7 lines. A-PAGE analysis identified 30 bands, of which only 4 were unique. Thus, the MALDI-TOF MS method was more sensitive than A-PAGE for identifying α/β- and γ-gliadins in the 33 durum wheat lines studied. Phylogenetic analyses performed using MALDI-TOF MS data assigned the durum wheat lines to two groups. The utility of MALDI-TOF MS to determine relationships among genotypes and for identification of durum wheat accessions is discussed.     

BALB/c mice infected with antimony treatment refractory isolate of Leishmania braziliensis present severe lesions due to IL-4 production

Background

Leishmania braziliensis is the main causative agent of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil. Protection against infection is related to development of Th1 responses, but the mechanisms that mediate susceptibility are still poorly understood. Murine models have been the most important tools in understanding the immunopathogenesis of L. major infection and have shown that Th2 responses favor parasite survival. In contrast, L. braziliensis–infected mice develop strong Th1 responses and easily resolve the infection, thus making the study of factors affecting susceptibility to this parasite difficult.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here, we describe an experimental model for the evaluation of the mechanisms mediating susceptibility to L. braziliensis infection. BALB/c mice were inoculated with stationary phase promastigotes of L. braziliensis, isolates LTCP393(R) and LTCP15171(S), which are resistant and susceptible to antimony and nitric oxide (NO), respectively. Mice inoculated with LTCP393(R) presented larger lesions that healed more slowly and contained higher parasite loads than lesions caused by LTCP15171(S). Inflammatory infiltrates in the lesions and production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10 and TGF-β were similar in mice inoculated with either isolate, indicating that these factors did not contribute to the different disease manifestations observed. In contrast, IL-4 production was strongly increased in LTCP393(R)-inoculated animals and also arginase I (Arg I) expression. Moreover, anti-IL-4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment resulted in decreased lesion thickness and parasite burden in animals inoculated with LTCP393(R), but not in those inoculated with LTCP15171(S).

Conclusion/Significance

We conclude that the ability of L. braziliensis isolates to induce Th2 responses affects the susceptibility to infection with these isolates and contributes to the increased virulence and severity of disease associated with them. Since these data reflect what happens in human infection, this model could be useful to study the pathogenesis of the L. braziliensis infection, as well as to design new strategies of therapeutic intervention.