The gut microbiota,a key to understanding the health implications of micro(nano)plastics and their biodegradation

The effects of plastic debris on the environment and plant, animal, and human health are a global challenge, with micro(nano)plastics (MNPs) being the main focus. MNPs are found so often in the food chain that they are provoking an increase in human intake. They have been detected in most categories of consumed foods, drinking water, and even human feces. Therefore, oral ingestion becomes the main source of exposure to MNPs, and the gastrointestinal tract, primarily the gut, constantly interacts with these small particles. The consequences of human exposure to MNPs remain unclear. However, current in vivo studies and in vitro gastrointestinal tract models have shown that MNPs of several types and sizes impact gut intestinal bacteria, affecting gut homeostasis. The typical microbiome signature of MNP ingestion is often associated with dysbiosis and loss of resilience, leads to frequent pathogen outbreaks, and local and systemic metabolic disorders. Moreover, the small micro- and nano-plastic particles found in animal tissues with accumulated evidence of microbial degradation of plastics/MNPs by bacteria and insect gut microbiota raise the issue of whether human gut bacteria make key contributions to the bio-transformation of ingested MNPs. Here, we discuss these issues and unveil the complex interplay between MNPs and the human gut microbiome. Therefore, the elucidation of the biological consequences of this interaction on both host and microbiota is undoubtedly challenging. It is expected that microbial biotechnology and microbiome research could help decipher the extent to which gut microorganisms diversify and MNP-determinant species, mechanisms, and enzymatic systems, as well as become important to understand our response to MNP exposure and provide background information to inspire future holistic studies.     

Engagement of DNA polymerases during apoptosis

DNA replicative and repair machinery was investigated by means of different techniques, including in vitro nuclear enzymatic assays, immunoelectron microscopy and confocal microscopy, in apoptotic cell lines such as HL-60 treated with methotrexate, P815 and K562 exposed to low temperatures and Friend cells exposed to ionizing radiation. The results showed a shift of DNA polymerase α and β activities. DNA polymerase α, which in controls was found to be the principal replicative enzyme driving DNA synthesis, underwent, upon apoptosis, a large decrease of its activity being replaced by DNA polymerase β which is believed to be associated with DNA repair. Such a modulation was concomitant with a topographical redistribution of both DNA polymerase α and the incorporation of BrdUrd throughout the nucleus. Taken together, these results indicate the occurrence of a dramatic response of the DNA machinery, through a possible common or at least similar behaviour when different cell lines are triggered to apoptosis. Although this possibility requires further investigation, these findings suggest an extreme attempt of the cell undergoing apoptosis to preserve its nuclear environment by switching on a repair/defence mechanism during fragmentation and chromatin margination.     

A chemical screen for modulators of mRNA translation identifies a distinct mechanism of toxicity for sphingosine kinase inhibitors

We here conducted an image-based chemical screen to evaluate how medically approved drugs, as well as drugs that are currently under development, influence overall translation levels. None of the compounds up-regulated translation, which could be due to the screen being performed in cancer cells grown in full media where translation is already present at very high levels. Regarding translation down-regulators, and consistent with current knowledge, inhibitors of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway were the most represented class. In addition, we identified that inhibitors of sphingosine kinases (SPHKs) also reduce mRNA translation levels independently of mTOR. Mechanistically, this is explained by an effect of the compounds on the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which activates the integrated stress response (ISR) and contributes to the toxicity of SPHK inhibitors. Surprisingly, the toxicity and activation of the ISR triggered by 2 independent SPHK inhibitors, SKI-II and ABC294640, the latter in clinical trials, are also observed in cells lacking SPHK1 and SPHK2. In summary, our study provides a useful resource on the effects of medically used drugs on translation, identified compounds capable of reducing translation independently of mTOR and has revealed that the cytotoxic properties of SPHK inhibitors being developed as anticancer agents are independent of SPHKs.

A chemical screen to evaluate how 4100 drugs modulate translation rates confirms mTOR as the main pathway regulating translation and reveals that sphingosine kinase inhibitors downregulate translation via activation of the ER-stress response. Sphingosine kinase inhibitors, including one in clinical trials, activate stress responses and kill cells independently of the cognate target.