Achene anatomy and stomatal characteristics of eighteen Crepis L. (Asteraceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on their systematic significance

Achene anatomy and stomatal characteristics of eighteen Crepis taxa from Turkey are here described for the first time. In all taxa examined the pericarp is composed of several layers of sclerenchymatous and parenchymatous cells. As for the achene, differences among taxa mainly concern the pericarp structure and its thickness and width. Stomata are present on both surface of the leaf in all studied taxa and all taxa have anomocytic type stomata. However, the dimensions (length and width) and density of the stomata differ significantly among the studied taxa. In addition, the dimensions of stomata are negatively correlated with stomata density. It is concluded that achene anatomy and stomatal characteristics are useful for delimitation of Crepis taxa and a key to taxa based on these characters is provided. However, based on achene anatomy and stomatal characteristics, we found no argument for an exclusion of the Lagoseris group from Crepis as has previously been proposed.     

A case with bilateral radio-ulnar synostosis

Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis may be an isolated abnormality or additional abnormalities may accompany it. It may also be found as a part of well-known syndromes. We present a case with bilateral congenital radio-ulnar synostosis, speech delay, dimple on shoulders, café au lait spot and characteristic facial appearance. The proband has a brother with similar clinical findings with the exception of congenital radio-ulnar synostosis. We discuss the possible relationship between our case and previously described syndromes with congenital radio-ulnar synostosis, and distinct phenotypic features of the presented case.     

Biological activity of bis-benzimidazole derivatives on DNA topoisomerase I and HeLa, MCF7 and A431 cells

Benzimidazoles of both natural and synthetic sources are the key components of many bio-active compounds. Several reports have shown antifungal, antiviral, H(2) receptor blocker and antitumor activities for benzimidazoles and their derivatives. In this study, we synthesized twelve bis-benzimidazole derivatives by selecting di(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)methane as the main compound. The numbers of carbons at 2 positions of bis-benzimidazole derivatives were changed from 1 to 4, and derivatives were synthesized with methyl substitutions at 5- and/or 6- positions. The compounds were screened via in vitro plasmid superciol relaxation assays using mammalian DNA topoisomerase I and cytostatic assays were carried out against HeLa (cervix adenocarcinoma), MCF7 (breast adenocarcinoma) and A431 (skin epidermoid carcinoma) cells for selected derivatives. Our results suggest that the malonic acid derivatives of bis-benzimidazoles, namely, bis(5-methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)methane and bis(5,6-dimethyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)methane, were remarkably active compounds in interfering with DNA topoisomerase I and the former compound was also found to be cytotoxic against MCF7 and A431 cells. The inhibitory effects obtained with these derivatives are significant as these compounds can be potential sources of anticancer agents.     

Degradation of ferrous(II) cyanide complex ions by Pseudomonas fluorescens

Degradation of ferrous(II) cyanide complex (ferrocyanide) ions by free cells of P. fluorescens in the presence of glucose and dissolved oxygen was investigated as a function of initial pH, initial ferrocyanide and glucose concentrations and aeration rate in a batch fermenter. The microorganism used the ferrocyanide ions as the sole source of nitrogen. The ferrocyanide biodegradation rate was 30.7 mg g⁻¹ h⁻¹ under the conditions of initial pH: 5, stirring rate: 150 rpm, aeration rate: 0.15 vvm, initial ferrous(II) cyanide complex ion and glucose concentrations: 100 mg l⁻¹ and 0.465 g l⁻¹, respectively. The culture utilized glucose as the main substrate following the non-competitive toxic component inhibition model in the presence of 100 mg l⁻¹ initial ferrous(II) cyanide complex ion concentration. The inhibition of ferrous(II) cyanide complex ions as a secondary substrate began at very low concentrations. A mathematical model, based on non-competitive substrate inhibition was used to describe the inhibitory effect of ferrous(II) cyanide complex ions on the growth of microorganism and the best fitted model parameters were determined by non-linear regression techniques.     

Amygdala microcircuits mediating fear expression and extinction

This review summarizes the latest developments in our understanding of amygdala networks that support classical fear conditioning, the experimental paradigm most commonly used to study learned fear in the laboratory. These recent advances have considerable translational significance as congruent findings from studies of fear learning in animals and humans indicate that anxiety disorders result from abnormalities in the mechanisms that normally regulate conditioned fear. Because of the introduction of new techniques and the continued use of traditional approaches, it is becoming clear that conditioned fear involves much more complex networks than initially believed, including coordinated interactions between multiple excitatory and inhibitory circuits within the amygdala.     

BRCT Domain Interactions with Phospho-Histone H2A Target Crb2 to Chromatin at Double-Strand Breaks and Maintain the DNA Damage Checkpoint

Relocalization of checkpoint proteins to chromatin flanking DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is critical for cellular responses to DNA damage. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Crb2, which mediates Chk1 activation by Rad3^ATR, forms ionizing radiation-induced nuclear foci (IRIF). Crb2 C-terminal BRCT domains (BRCT₂) bind histone H2A phosphorylated at a C-terminal SQ motif by Tel1^ATM and Rad3^ATR, although the functional significance of this interaction is controversial. Here, we show that polar interactions of Crb2 serine-548 and lysine-619 with the phosphate group of phospho-H2A (γ-H2A) are critical for Crb2 IRIF formation and checkpoint function. Mutations of these BRCT₂ domain residues have additive effects when combined in a single allele. Combining either mutation with an allele that eliminates the threonine-215 cyclin-dependent kinase phosphorylation site completely abrogates Crb2 IRIF and function. We propose that cooperative phosphate interactions in the BRCT₂ γ-H2A-binding pocket of Crb2, coupled with tudor domain interactions with lysine-20 dimethylation of histone H4, facilitate stable recruitment of Crb2 to chromatin surrounding DSBs, which in turn mediates efficient phosphorylation of Chk1 that is required for a sustained checkpoint response. This mechanism of cooperative interactions with the γ-H2A/X phosphate is likely conserved in S. pombe Brc1 and human Mdc1 genome maintenance proteins.Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most dangerous forms of DNA damage (26, 30). Human cells experience DSBs several times a day, either during normal metabolism or as a consequence of exposure to DNA-damaging agents, such as ionizing radiation (IR) (18). Importantly, the unfaithful repair of such breaks can result in genome instability and cancer. The response to DSBs is coordinated by a conserved signal transduction cascade, which leads to cell cycle arrest and activation of DNA repair and constitutes the checkpoint response (9, 14, 20). The essential players in this process fall into four groups: sensors, mediators, transducers, and effectors (20). Sensors are the first to recognize and bind to DNA breaks and include the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex in humans and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae). The PIKKs (phosphoinositide 3-kinase-like kinases) ATR-ATRIP (ScMec1-ScDdc2/SpRad3-SpRad26) and ATM (ScTel1/SpTel1) act as transducers that transmit the signal to the effector kinases Chk1 (ScChk1/SpChk1) and Chk2 (ScRad53/SpCds1), whose role is to target downstream targets, such as p53 in mammals, and to amplify the signal (9, 14, 20).Signaling between transducers and effectors is facilitated and enhanced by mediator proteins (19, 20). In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Crb2/Rhp9 is a critical mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint (31, 42) and is related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 and mammalian 53BP1 (p53 binding protein 1). Rad3^ATR-Rad26^ATRIP phosphorylates Crb2 in response to damage, and Crb2 is required for phosphorylation of Chk1 by Rad3^ATR-Rad26^ATRIP (31). Chk1, in turn, restrains entry into mitosis by phosphorylating and thus inactivating the phosphatase Cdc25 that is a mitotic inducer (10, 11, 28). Crb2-null cells are sensitive to a range of genotoxins and are unable to delay division in response to DNA damage (31, 42).Crb2 is a nuclear protein that rapidly relocalizes to DSBs. This occurs on such a large scale that IR-induced nuclear foci (IRIF) of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-tagged Crb2 expressed from the endogenous promoter are readily detected by live cell microscopy (5). These foci colocalize with homologous recombination (HR) repair factors such as Rad22^Rad52. Two types of histone modifications regulate Crb2 localization at DSBs: C-terminal phosphorylation of histone H2A, denoted as γ-H2A (23), and lysine-20 dimethylation of histone H4, denoted as H4-K20me2 (32). Phosphorylation of an SQ motif within the C-terminal tail of histone H2A of budding yeast or fission yeast, or the H2AX variant in mammals, is one of the earliest cellular responses triggered by DNA damage (3, 23, 29). The γ-H2A/X modification, which is catalyzed by the checkpoint kinases ATR^Rad3 and ATM^Tel1, spans large distances on both sides of a DSB, and it plays a critical role in recruiting DNA damage response proteins, chromatin remodeling complexes, and cohesin (2, 21, 23, 34, 35, 37, 38, 40). Protein crystallography and biochemical studies established that mammalian Mdc1, S. pombe Crb2, and Brc1 DNA damage response proteins directly bind the phosphorylated tail of histone H2A/X through tandem C-terminal BRCT domains (16, 35, 40). In contrast to γ-H2A, H4-K20 methylation catalyzed by Set9/Kmt5 histone methyltransferase appears to be constitutive and not regulated by DNA damage (32). H4-K20me2 directly binds tandem tudor domains (Tudor₂) located to the N-terminal side of the BRCT domains in Crb2 (1).YFP-Crb2 does not form IRIF in hta1-S129A hta2-S128A (htaAQ) or rad3Δ tel1Δ cells, in which γ-H2A phosphorylation is abolished (23), or in set9Δ cells or tudor domain mutants of Crb2 that ablate binding to H4-K20me2 (6, 32). However, Crb2 checkpoint functions are only partially impaired in an htaAQ set9Δ strain, implying that physiologically significant recruitment of Crb2 to DSBs also occurs by a histone modification-independent pathway. Indeed, we found that YFP-Crb2 forms microscopically visible foci in htaAQ set9Δ cells when DSBs are created by HO endonuclease or by treating cells in G₁ phase with IR (6). Unlike IR-induced DSBs formed during G₂ phase, these types of DSBs lack an intact sister chromatid that can be used for HR repair and therefore they are highly persistent. Further analysis revealed that the histone modification-independent pathway of recruiting Crb2 to DSBs requires threonine-215 (Thr215) phosphorylation catalyzed by the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) Cdc2, which facilitates an interaction with Cut5 (ScDpb11; mammalian TopBP1) (6, 8, 31). The crb2-T215A mutation does not ablate YFP-Crb2 IRIF formation; however, Crb2 Thr215 phosphorylation is required for formation of YFP-Crb2 foci at persistent DSBs in htaAQ or set9Δ cells, and combining crb2-T215A with htaAQ or set9Δ abolishes Crb2 function (6).The tandem C-terminal BRCT domains (BRCT₂) of Crb2 not only mediate interactions with γ-H2A but also coordinate Crb2 homodimerization (4). In fact, replacing BRCT₂ with a leucine zipper (LZ) dimerization motif restores substantial function to Crb2 without restoring its ability to form IRIF. Thus, the most crucial task of the Crb2 BRCT domains is to provide a homodimerization platform, while binding to γ-H2A provides an additional function that is necessary for full resistance to DNA damage (4).In a recent study, Kilkenny et al. (16) solved the crystal structures of Crb2-BRCT₂ alone and in complex with a γ-H2A-derived phosphopeptide containing the common C-terminal residues of H2A.1 and H2A.2 (the two H2A paralogues in S. pombe). These analyses revealed the structural determinants of BRCT₂ binding to γ-H2A and BRCT₂-mediated homodimerization of Crb2. Ser666 was found to be critical for homodimerization in vitro, and mutation of this residue severely impaired Crb2 function in vivo. Residues Ser548 and Lys619 were identified as important for the interaction with the phosphate group on γ-H2A.1 pSer129. However, a charge reversal mutation of Lys619 did not abrogate Crb2 IRIF formation measured using methanol-fixed cells, although it did disrupt binding to a γ-H2A peptide in vitro (16). These unexpected findings indicated that γ-H2A likely has an indirect role in regulating Crb2 localization at DSBs. Here, we investigate Crb2 localization in live cells and find that while mutations of Ser548 or Lys619 partially impair Crb2 IRIF, the corresponding double mutant is severely deficient in Crb2 IRIF formation. Our findings and an independent study by Sanders et al. (33) show that γ-H2A binding to BRCT₂ is critical for Crb2 focus formation at IR-induced DSBs and for maintaining a DNA damage checkpoint response.     

Neutralization of SARS‐CoV‐2 by highly potent,hyperthermostable, and mutation‐tolerant nanobodies

Monoclonal anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoglobulins represent a treatment option for COVID‐19. However, their production in mammalian cells is not scalable to meet the global demand. Single‐domain (VHH) antibodies (also called nanobodies) provide an alternative suitable for microbial production. Using alpaca immune libraries against the receptor‐binding domain (RBD) of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike protein, we isolated 45 infection‐blocking VHH antibodies. These include nanobodies that can withstand 95°C. The most effective VHH antibody neutralizes SARS‐CoV‐2 at 17–50 pM concentration (0.2–0.7 µg per liter), binds the open and closed states of the Spike, and shows a tight RBD interaction in the X‐ray and cryo‐EM structures. The best VHH trimers neutralize even at 40 ng per liter. We constructed nanobody tandems and identified nanobody monomers that tolerate the K417N/T, E484K, N501Y, and L452R immune‐escape mutations found in the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Epsilon, Iota, and Delta/Kappa lineages. We also demonstrate neutralization of the Beta strain at low‐picomolar VHH concentrations. We further discovered VHH antibodies that enforce native folding of the RBD in the E. coli cytosol, where its folding normally fails. Such “fold‐promoting” nanobodies may allow for simplified production of vaccines and their adaptation to viral escape‐mutations.     

Fbh1 Limits Rad51-Dependent Recombination at Blocked Replication Forks

Controlling the loading of Rad51 onto DNA is important for governing when and how homologous recombination is used. Here we use a combination of genetic assays and indirect immunofluorescence to show that the F-box DNA helicase (Fbh1) functions in direct opposition to the Rad52 orthologue Rad22 to curb Rad51 loading onto DNA in fission yeast. Surprisingly, this activity is unnecessary for limiting spontaneous direct-repeat recombination. Instead it appears to play an important role in preventing recombination when replication forks are blocked and/or broken. When overexpressed, Fbh1 specifically reduces replication fork block-induced recombination, as well as the number of Rad51 nuclear foci that are induced by replicative stress. These abilities are dependent on its DNA helicase/translocase activity, suggesting that Fbh1 exerts its control on recombination by acting as a Rad51 disruptase. In accord with this, overexpression of Fbh1 also suppresses the high levels of recombinant formation and Rad51 accumulation at a site-specific replication fork barrier in a strain lacking the Rad51 disruptase Srs2. Similarly overexpression of Srs2 suppresses replication fork block-induced gene conversion events in an fbh1Δ mutant, although an inability to suppress deletion events suggests that Fbh1 has a distinct functionality, which is not readily substituted by Srs2.Homologous recombination (HR) is often described as a double-edged sword: it can maintain genome stability by promoting DNA repair, while its injudicious action can disturb genome stability by causing gross chromosome rearrangement (GCR) or loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Both GCR and LOH are potential precursors of diseases such as cancer, and consequently there is need to control when and how HR is used.A key step in most HR is the loading of the Rad51 recombinase onto single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which forms a nucleoprotein filament (nucleofilament) that catalyzes the pairing of homologous DNAs and subsequent strand invasion (32). This is a critical point at which recombination can be regulated through the removal of the Rad51 filament (60). Early removal can prevent strand invasion altogether, freeing the DNA for alternative processing. Later removal may limit unnecessary filament growth, free the 3′-OH of the invading strand to prime DNA synthesis, and ultimately enable ejection of the invading strand, which is important for the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) by synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA). SDSA avoids the formation of Holliday junctions that can be resolved into reciprocal exchange products (crossovers), which may result in GCR or LOH if the recombination is ectopic or allelic, respectively.One enzyme that appears to be able to control Rad51 in the aforementioned manner is the yeast superfamily 1 DNA helicase Srs2 (42). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Srs2 is recruited to stalled replication forks by the SUMOylation of PCNA, and there it appears to block Rad51-dependent HR in favor of Rad6- and Rad18-dependent postreplication repair (1, 2, 35, 50, 53, 58). In vitro Srs2 can strip Rad51 from ssDNA via its DNA translocase activity (31, 62) and therefore probably controls HR at stalled replication forks by acting as a Rad51 disruptase. In accord with this, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis has shown that Rad51 is enriched at or near replication forks in an srs2 mutant (50). Srs2 also plays an important role in crossover avoidance during DSB repair, where it is thought to promote SDSA by both disrupting Rad51 nucleofilaments and dissociating displacement (D) loops (20, 27).Srs2 is conserved in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (19, 43, 63) and has a close relative in bacteria called UvrD, which can similarly control HR by disrupting RecA nucleofilaments (61). However, an obvious homologue in mammals has not been detected. Recently, two mammalian members of the RecQ DNA helicase family, BLM and RECQL5, were shown to disrupt Rad51 nucleofilaments in vitro (11, 25), although in the case of BLM, this activity appears to be relatively weak (5, 55). Nevertheless these data have led to speculation that both BLM and RECQL5 might perform a function similar to that of Srs2 in vivo (6). Certainly mutational inactivation of either helicase results in elevated levels of HR and genome instability, with an associated increased rate of cancer (23, 25). However, BLM and RECQL5 are not the only potential Rad51 disruptases in mammals; a relative of Srs2 and UvrD called FBH1 was recently implicated in this role by genetic studies of its orthologue in S. pombe and by its ability to partially compensate for the loss of Srs2 in S. cerevisiae, which, unlike S. pombe, lacks an FBH1 orthologue (15). FBH1 is so named because of an F box near its N terminus—a feature that makes it unique among DNA helicases (28). The F box is important for its interaction with SKP1 and therefore the formation of an E3 ubiquitin ligase SCF (SKP1-Cul1-F-box protein) complex (29). The targets of this complex are currently unknown. In S. pombe, mutations within Fbh1''s F-box block interaction with Skp1 and prevent Fbh1 from localizing to the nucleus and forming damage-induced foci therein (57). Fbh1''s role in constraining Rad51 activity in S. pombe is evidenced by the increase in spontaneous Rad51 foci and accumulation of UV irradiation-induced Rad51-dependent recombination intermediates in an fbh1Δ mutant (47). Moreover, loss of both Fbh1 and Srs2 in S. pombe results in a synergistic reduction in cell viability, and like Srs2, Fbh1 is essential for viability in the absence of the S. pombe RecQ family DNA helicase Rqh1, which processes recombination intermediates (47, 48). In both cases the synthetic interaction is suppressed by deleting rad51, suggesting that Fbh1 works in parallel with Srs2 and Rqh1 to prevent the formation of toxic recombination intermediates. In yeast, Rad51-mediated recombination is dependent on Rad52 (Rad22 in S. pombe), which is believed to promote the nucleation of Rad51 onto DNA that is coated with the ssDNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA) (18, 32). Intriguingly, the genotoxin sensitivity and recombination deficiency of a rad22 mutant are suppressed in a Rad51-dependent manner by deleting fbh1 (48). This suggests that Fbh1 and Rad22 act in opposing ways to modulate the assembly of the Rad51 nucleofilament. Although current data indicate a role for Fbh1 in controlling HR, the only evidence so far that Fbh1 limits recombinant formation is in chicken DT40 cells, for which a modest increase in sister chromatid exchange has been noted when FBH1 is deleted (30).Here we present in vivo evidence suggesting that Fbh1 does indeed act as a Rad51 disruptase, which is dependent on its DNA helicase/translocase activity. We confirm predictions that this activity works in opposition to Rad22 for the loading of Rad51 onto DNA and show that Fbh1''s modulation of Rad51 activity, while not essential for limiting spontaneous direct-repeat recombination, is critical for preventing recombination at blocked replication forks. Finally, we highlight similarities and differences between Fbh1 and Srs2, based on their mutant phenotypes and relative abilities to suppress recombination when overexpressed. Overall our data affirm that Fbh1 is one of the principal modulators of Rad51 activity in fission yeast and therefore may play a similar role in vertebrates.