PARC6, a novel chloroplast division factor, influences FtsZ assembly and is required for recruitment of PDV1 during chloroplast division in Arabidopsis

Chloroplast division in plant cells is accomplished through the coordinated action of the tubulin-like FtsZ ring inside the organelle and the dynamin-like ARC5 ring outside the organelle. This coordination is facilitated by ARC6, an inner envelope protein required for both assembly of FtsZ and recruitment of ARC5. Recently, we showed that ARC6 specifies the mid-plastid positioning of the outer envelope proteins PDV1 and PDV2, which have parallel functions in dynamin recruitment. PDV2 positioning involves direct ARC6–PDV2 interaction, but PDV1 and ARC6 do not interact indicating that an additional factor functions downstream of ARC6 to position PDV1. Here, we show that PARC6 (paralog of ARC6), an ARC6-like protein unique to vascular plants, fulfills this role. Like ARC6, PARC6 is an inner envelope protein with its N-terminus exposed to the stroma and Arabidopsis parc6 mutants exhibit defects of chloroplast and FtsZ filament morphology. However, whereas ARC6 promotes FtsZ assembly, PARC6 appears to inhibit FtsZ assembly, suggesting that ARC6 and PARC6 function as antagonistic regulators of FtsZ dynamics. The FtsZ inhibitory activity of PARC6 may involve its interaction with the FtsZ-positioning factor ARC3. A PARC6–GFP fusion protein localizes both to the mid-plastid and to a single spot at one pole, reminiscent of the localization of ARC3, PDV1 and ARC5. Although PARC6 localizes PDV1, it is not required for PDV2 localization or ARC5 recruitment. Our findings indicate that PARC6, like ARC6, plays a role in coordinating the internal and external components of the chloroplast division complex, but that PARC6 has evolved distinct functions in the division process.     

Imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine diaryl ureas: Inhibitors of the receptor tyrosine kinase EphB4

Inhibition of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRs) has been validated by recently launched small molecules Sutent^® and Nexavar^®, both of which display activities against several angiogenesis-related RTKs. EphB4, a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) involved in the processes of embryogenesis and angiogenesis, has been shown to be aberrantly up regulated in many cancer types such as breast, lung, bladder and prostate. We propose that inhibition of EphB4 in addition to other validated RTKs would enhance the anti-angiogenic effect and ultimately result in more pronounced anti-cancer efficacy. Herein we report the discovery and SAR of a novel series of imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine diarylureas that show nanomolar potency for the EphB4 receptor, in addition to potent activity against several other RTKs.     

Differences in binding and effector functions between classes of TNF antagonists

There are currently two Food and Drug Administration-approved classes of biologic agents that target tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α): anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (adalimumab and infliximab), and soluble TNF receptors (etanercept). This study examined the ability of the TNF antagonists to: (1) bind various polymorphic variants of cell surface-expressed Fc receptors (FcγRs) and the complement component C1q, and (2) mediate Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CDC) killing of cells expressing membrane-bound TNF (mTNF) in vitro. Both mAbs and the soluble TNF receptor demonstrated low-level binding to the activating receptors FcγRI, FcγRIIa, and FcγRIIIa, and the inhibitory receptor FcγRIIb, in the absence of exogenous TNF. However, upon addition of TNF, the mAbs, but not etanercept, showed significantly increased binding, in particular to the FcγRII and FcγRIII receptors. Infliximab and adalimumab induced ADCC much more potently than etanercept. In the presence of TNF, both mAbs bound C1q in in vitro assays, but etanercept did not bind C1q under any conditions. Infliximab and adalimumab also induced CDC in cells expressing mTNF more potently than etanercept. Differences in the ability to bind ligand and mediate cell death may account for the differences in efficacy and safety of TNF antagonists.     

Building Developmental Integration into Functional Systems: Function-Induced Integration of Mandibular Shape

The mammalian mandible is a developmentally modular but functionally integrated system. Whether morphological integration can evolve to match the optimal pattern of functional integration may depend on the developmental origin of integration, specifically, on the role that direct epigenetic interactions play in shaping integration. These interactions are hypothesized to integrate modules and also to be highly conservative, potentially constraining the evolution of integration. Using the fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) mandible as a model system, we test five a priori developmental hypotheses that predict mandibular integration and we also explore for correlations between shapes of mandibular regions not anticipated by any of the developmental models. To determine whether direct epigenetic interactions are highly conserved in rodents, we examine the correlation structure of fluctuating asymmetry, and compare integration patterns between fox squirrels and prairie deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii). In fox squirrels, we find a correlation structure unanticipated by all a priori developmental models: adjacent parts along the proximodistal jaw axis are correlated whereas more distant ones are not. The most notable exception is that the shape of the anterior incisor alveolus is correlated with the shape of the ramus (FA component) or coronoid (symmetric component). Those exceptions differ between species; in prairie deer mice, the molar alveolus is connected to more parts, and the incisor alveolus to fewer, than in fox squirrels. The structure of integration suggests that the mandible cannot be decomposed into parts but rather is a single connected unit, a result consistent with its functional integration. That match between functional and developmental integration may arise, at least in part, from function-induced growth, building developmental integration into the functional system and enabling direct epigenetic interactions to evolve when function does.     

Two new combinations in Pyrostria (Rubiaceae, Vanguerieae) from Thailand

In order to bring the names of two Rubiaceae taxa into current usage, two new combinations are proposed in Pyrostria: P. brunnescens (Craib) Utteridge & A.P.Davis, and P. cochinchinense (Pierre ex Pit.) Utteridge & A.P.Davis. Pyrostria brunnescens occurs in Thailand and P. cochinchinense in Indo-China (Thailand, Vietnam) and Malesia (Malaysia, N Borneo).     

Proteolytic processing of TAR DNA binding protein-43 by caspases produces C-terminal fragments with disease defining properties independent of progranulin

Neuronal and glial deposition of misfolded, proteolytically processed, polyubiquitinated and abnormally phosphorylated C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of the TAR DNA binding protein-43 (TDP-43) is a pathological hallmark of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin positive inclusions (FTLD-U) and certain cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We demonstrate that TDP-43 can be proteolytically processed by caspases upon induction of apoptosis to a major 35 kDa and a minor 25 kDa CTF. These fragments are initially soluble, but over time they accumulate as insoluble and pathologically phosphorylated derivatives. However, proteolytic processing appears not to be absolutely required for the deposition of insoluble TDP-43 species, since a caspase resistant mutant of TDP-43 is also converted into insoluble species. Phosphorylation at S409/410 apparently occurs late during the conversion of soluble to insoluble TDP-43, suggesting that phosphorylation is not a prerequisite for aggregation. Loss of function of the progranulin (PGRN) gene causes FTLD-U with TDP-43 positive inclusions and has been suggested to lead to caspase activation and subsequent TDP-43 processing. However, siRNA-mediated knockdown of PGRN in cell culture as well as a PGRN gene knockout in mice failed to cause the formation of the disease characterizing CTFs of TDP-43. Our findings therefore suggest that caspase-mediated processing generates CTFs of similar biochemical properties as those occurring in nuclear and cytoplasmic deposits of FTLD-U patients independent of PGRN levels.     

Introduction of Exogenous Epitopes in the Variable Regions of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein: Effect on Viral Infectivity and the Neutralization Phenotype

In this study we examined whether human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is equally susceptible to neutralization by a given antibody when the epitope of this antibody is introduced at different positions within the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env). To this end, we introduced two exogenous “epitope tags” at different locations within three major Env regions in two distinct HIV-1 isolates. We examined how the introduction of the exogenous epitopes affects Env expression, Env incorporation into virions, Env fusogenic potential, and viral susceptibility to neutralization. Our data indicate that even within the same Env region, the exact positioning of the epitope impacts the susceptibility of the virus to neutralization by the antibody that binds to that epitope. Our data also indicate that even if the same epitope is introduced in the exact same position on two different Envs, its exposure and, as a result, the neutralization susceptibility of the virus, can be very different. In contrast to the findings of previous studies conducted with HIV-1 isolates other than those used here, but in agreement with results obtained with simian immunodeficiency virus, we observed that tagging of the fourth variable region of Env (V4) did not result in neutralization by the anti-tag antibodies. Our data indicate that epitopes in V4 are not properly exposed within the functional HIV-1 trimeric Env spike, suggesting that V4 may not be a good target for vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies.The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein (Env) is expressed as a heavily glycosylated peptide of approximately 160 kDa (gp160), which is cleaved intracellularly into two noncovalently associated subunits: an extracellular subunit (gp120), responsible for CD4 and coreceptor (primarily CCR5 and/or CXCR4) binding, and a transmembrane subunit (gp41) that mediates fusion between viral and host cell membranes. Based on amino acid sequence homology analysis of gp120s derived from diverse HIV-1 isolates, gp120 is divided into five “constant” regions (C1 to C5) and five “variable” regions (also called “loops,” because most of them have cysteines in the N and C termini that form disulfide bonds). Despite their extensive amino acid variability, the variable loops of gp120 play central roles during the entry of the virus into the cell, for instance, by directly or indirectly modulating the interaction of Env with coreceptor molecules on the target surfaces during virus-cell fusion. They also offer protection from neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) by various mechanisms. The variable loops themselves are targets of NAbs, and during infection, the replicating virus accumulates mutations in the variable regions that allow it to escape the action of anti-variable loop-directed NAbs, while at the same time the variable loops are positioned within the Env trimer so that they prevent, or minimize, the binding of NAbs to more-conserved epitopes, such as the receptor and coreceptor binding sites (4, 5, 12, 15, 20, 23, 25, 27, 31).HIV-1 strains display distinct neutralization phenotypes. Some isolates, such as SF162, are generally susceptible to NAbs that bind to many distinct regions of Env, including the variable regions, while other isolates, such as YU2 or JRFL, are generally resistant to neutralization by the same NAbs (1). It has been proposed that irrespective of the overall neutralizing phenotype of HIV-1 isolates, the binding of only a single antibody per Env trimer on the virion surface can lead to neutralization, when all Env trimers present on the virion surface are bound by at least one antibody (32). This important observation also implies that the epitope specificity of an antibody may not be as important for neutralization as its ability to bind to its target within the trimeric Env structure. In fact, antibodies to diverse regions of Env, such as V1, V2, V3, and the receptor and coreceptor binding sites, can all neutralize HIV-1 (1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30).In many cases, a given isolate will not be equally susceptible to neutralization by NAbs that bind to different Env regions, for example, the V3 loop and the CD4-binding site (CD4-BS). Whether differences in the neutralizing potentials of two antibodies that bind to distinct epitopes on HIV-1 Env are due to differences in the binding affinities of the two antibodies or whether they occur because the viruses are intrinsically more susceptible to NAbs that bind certain epitopes and not others (i.e., the relative importance of the various regions of Env in Env function and virus neutralization sensitivity differs) is not yet fully understood. One way to address these issues is to introduce small non-HIV Env amino acid sequences (tags) that are targets of known monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) at various positions within the viral Env and to examine how the placement of the same epitope at different positions within Env affects the neutralization phenotype of the virus.Foreign epitopes have been introduced into the variable regions of HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Envs, and their effects on viral neutralization potential have been examined (14, 19, 22, 33). Yang and colleagues (33) introduced the FLAG epitope into the V4 regions of three HIV-1 isolates (YU2, JRFL, and HxB2) displaying distinct neutralization phenotypes in response to anti-HIV NAbs; they found that all three pseudotyped viruses were equivalently neutralized by an anti-FLAG MAb. One important implication of that study is that neutralization-resistant isolates, such as YU2 or JRFL, are not intrinsically more resistant to neutralization than more-susceptible isolates, such as HxB2, so long as the antibody binds to its epitope on the functional virion-associated Env spike. A second implication is that since the FLAG epitope was exposed in the V4 loops of all three isolates, the V4 loop could theoretically be a good target for vaccine-elicited antibodies. In contrast, Pantophlet et al. (19) introduced the HA tag into various regions of the JRCSF (neutralization-resistant) and HxB2 (neutralization-sensitive) isolates and reported that JRCSF was intrinsically more resistant than HxB2 to anti-HA antibodies. This observation implies, therefore, that some HIV-1 strains (primary, neutralization-resistant strains) have developed mechanisms that limit the accessibility of multiple Env regions, including variable regions, to antibodies developed during infection. Laird and Desrosiers (14) introduced the FLAG epitope into two positions within each of the V1, V2, and V4 loops of SIV239 and SIV316. They reported that the functionality of Env was differentially affected by the precise location of the exogenous tag sequence within the variable loops examined. Importantly, and in contrast to what was reported for the HIV-1 isolates mentioned above, the SIV239 variants containing a V4 FLAG epitope were not neutralized by an anti-FLAG MAb. It appeared, however, that the FLAG epitope was not well exposed on the trimeric Env when introduced into the V4 loop of SIV but was exposed when introduced into the V1 loop of the same virus. Potentially, this means that the V4 loop is differentially exposed in the context of the HIV-1 and SIV Envs.The FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDK) is highly charged. Therefore, it is possible that the effect on Env function and epitope exposure could differ if a different exogenous epitope were inserted instead of FLAG. Here we examined the effect of variable loop tagging on the Env functions and viral neutralization phenotypes of two primary HIV-1 clade B isolates, SF162 (CCR5 tropic) and SF33 (CXCR4 tropic), using two exogenous epitopes (FLAG and hemagglutinin [HA] tags) positioned at multiple locations within the V1, V2, and V4 loops. By placing the same tag in several regions within each loop, we investigated the accessibilities of various parts of the same loop to a given NAb. By using two tags that differ significantly in amino acid composition (FLAG tag, DYKDDDDK; HA tag, YPYDVPDYA), we aimed at distinguishing between the effects of amino acid composition and the positioning of the tag on Env function and overall epitope exposure. Finally, identical evaluations of R5 and X4 Envs may provide information about the relative roles played in neutralization by variable loops in Envs displaying distinct coreceptor usage. We report that both the amino acid sequence and the position of the tag within and among the variable loops greatly affected the functionality of Env. In contrast to previous observations made with other HIV-1 Envs (33) but in agreement with what was reported for the SIV239 Env (14), we observed that tagging of the V4 loops of SF162 and SF33 did not render these isolates susceptible to neutralization by the corresponding anti-tag MAbs.