Food web structure in riverine landscapes

1. Most research on freshwater (and other) food webs has focused on apparently discrete communities, in well-defined habitats at small spatial and temporal scales, whereas in reality food webs are embedded in complex landscapes, such as river corridors. Food web linkages across such landscapes may be crucial for ecological pattern and process, however. Here, we consider the importance of large scale influences upon lotic food webs across the three spatial dimensions and through time.
2. We assess the roles of biotic factors (e.g. predation, competition) and physical habitat features (e.g. geology, land-use, habitat fragmentation) in moulding food web structure at the landscape scale. As examples, external subsidies to lotic communities of nutrients, detritus and prey vary along the river corridor, and food web links are made and broken across the land–water interface with the rise and fall of the flood.
3. We identify several avenues of potentially fruitful research, particularly the need to quantify energy flow and population dynamics. Stoichiometric analysis of changes in C : N : P nutrient ratios over large spatial gradients (e.g. from river source to mouth, in forested versus agricultural catchments), offers a novel method of uniting energy flow and population dynamics to provide a more holistic view of riverine food webs from a landscape perspective. Macroecological approaches can be used to examine large-scale patterns in riverine food webs (e.g. trophic rank and species–area relationships). New multivariate statistical techniques can be used to examine community responses to environmental gradients and to assign traits to individual species (e.g. body-size, functional feeding group), to unravel the organisation and trophic structure of riverine food webs.     

Identification of Synapomorphic Characteris in the Genus Sarcocystis Based on 18S rDNA Sequence Comparison

ABSTRACT. In order to further investigate synapomorphic characters in the genus Sarcocystis , the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences of Sarcocystis capracanis and Sarcocystis moulei were determined and used to infer the phylogenetic position of these two organisms within the cyst-forming coccidia. Phylogenies derived using distance, maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods demonstrated that S. capracanis groups with Sarcoystis tenella and Sarcocystis arieticanis as a clade that shares the characteristic of using canids as their definitive host. S. moulei was shown to group with Sarcocystis gigantea and Sarcocystis fusiformis as a clade that shares the characteristic of using felids as their definitive host.     

How tetrapods feed in water: a functional analysis by paradigm

Mechanical theory is used to erect a paradigm predicting the manipulations used by carnivorous aquatic amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals to catch, subdue, process and swallow their prey. These predictions are confirmed by observational evidence. Most aquatic predatory tetrapods use long, prehensile tooth-armed jaws as pincer jaws to snap shut onto the prey and catch and kill it, although some use the flexibility of long necks in spear fishing and some odontocetes may stun prey with sonar. Most do not have cutting or nipping dentitions as these cannot be used on prey which is freely floating. They use caniniform dentition to hold and kill prey, or in some cases crushing dentition to break open hard-shelled prey. They dismember prey by dynamic loading, snatching bites so quickly that the prey tears. They use shake feeding, shaking the prey apart from side to side above the water. If the prey is too large to lift above the water they use twist feeding, twisting pieces off. Small pieces are easily swallowed but larger pieces are held above the water and swallowed by tilting the head back in gravity feeding, or by jerking the head back and forth in incrtial feeding. Some animals use mobile jaws to pull prey back into the mouth in ratchet feeding. Filter feeding evades these problems by feeding on very small prey. The use of paradigms in functional analysis is discussed with special reference to this work. The paradigm method is shown to be the most suitable one. There has been repeated convergent and parallel evolution of adaptations to feed in water.