全文获取类型
收费全文 | 51篇 |
免费 | 2篇 |
出版年
2012年 | 1篇 |
2011年 | 1篇 |
2010年 | 1篇 |
2009年 | 1篇 |
2006年 | 1篇 |
2005年 | 1篇 |
2004年 | 3篇 |
2003年 | 3篇 |
2002年 | 3篇 |
2000年 | 1篇 |
1999年 | 1篇 |
1998年 | 2篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
1996年 | 1篇 |
1995年 | 1篇 |
1994年 | 1篇 |
1993年 | 1篇 |
1990年 | 2篇 |
1989年 | 3篇 |
1988年 | 2篇 |
1987年 | 3篇 |
1986年 | 1篇 |
1985年 | 2篇 |
1984年 | 5篇 |
1982年 | 1篇 |
1981年 | 1篇 |
1978年 | 1篇 |
1977年 | 2篇 |
1976年 | 3篇 |
1964年 | 2篇 |
1962年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有53条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
41.
在内蒙古鄂尔多斯高原东南角的毛乌素洼地 ,一条从陕北黄土高原流来的小河蜿蜒穿行于茫茫沙海之中。它犹如一条凶猛的蛟龙冲开波状起伏的沙丘 ,将所经之处的第四纪地层切割出七八十米深的峡谷 ,同时在身后留下一个又一个串珠状的绿洲 (当地人称为“沟湾” ,为当今村庄、农田所在 )。这条夹带黄色泥沙的小河被蒙族群众称为“萨拉乌苏” ,即蒙语“黄水”的意思。另外 ,两岸的红柳在盛夏时节用盛开的小花给河谷抹上一层若隐若现的粉红彩色 ,小河又因此多了一个带有诗意的名字———红柳河 (图 1和图 2 )。每当雨季来临 ,湍急的河水侵蚀河岸 ,不… 相似文献
42.
几乎到本世纪40年代结束为止,日本列岛是否存在旧石器时代的人类还是一个未定论的问题。1949年7月,相沢忠洋在群马县新田郡笠悬村岩宿附近的火山灰堆积崖面上,采到一些黑曜石制品。同年9月中旬至10月上旬,经明治大学文学部考古学研究室杉原荘介等人试掘,确认这是日本列岛首次发现的旧石器遗址。岩宿遗址的发现,与差不多同时掀起的对兵库县明石市西郊西八木海岸出土的明石人骨(1931年发现,标本毁于第二次大战战火, 现仅存石膏模型)的重新评价,开创了日本史前史研究的新纪元 。 相似文献
43.
印度-太平洋史前学会第15届大会在泰国召开新年伊始,来自20多个国家和地区的200多名代表云集泰国北部名城清迈,出席1994年1月5-12日举行的印度一太平洋史前学会第15届大会.在这次四年一度的学术盛会上,学者们就本区早期人类及文化、早期农业及商品... 相似文献
44.
45.
梁山旧石器遗址的初步观察 总被引:6,自引:6,他引:0
梁山旧石器产自汉水第三阶地砾石层,与“大熊猫-剑齿象动物群”共生,是一个含手斧的旧石器时代初期工业。它与秦岭北坡“汾渭地堑”的同期文化关系密切,在类型和技术上与华南的百色石器、朝鲜半岛的全谷里文化、东非的奥杜韦文化和发达的奥杜威文化也有相似之处。 相似文献
46.
We are greatly encouraged by the enthusiastic discussionssince the publication of our report on Science (vol. 287, no. 5458, p1622-1626, 2000) on the Bose Paleolithic study. These discussions are highly appreciated, as they are positive in promoting the development of Paleolithic science in Chi-na, and in clarifying some issues at Bose. Here, particular thanks are extended to Lin for his comments, which are briefly addressed as follows.
Most of the questions of Lin are centered on the relations of the tektites, stone artifacts and the stratigraphy. These had already been raised in the comments of Koeberl et al (vol.289, no. 5479, p507a, title :Tektites and the Age Paradox in Mid-Pleistocene China) and replied in detail in July 2000 in the same issue. Since then, further investigations have been carried out at Bose and there has not been any new evidence affecting our earlier interpretations, which are also supported by the lack of stone artifacts on the terraces younger than T4. It should be clarified that the stone tools discovered at the upper-most part of T4 at some localities are of Neolithic age, rather than Paleolithic. Thus, the statement of Lin about two possible generations of Paleolithic layers is not supported but should be further studied. Lin questioned in his past publications the existence of handaxe in the Paleolithic of China while typical handaxes in China have been internationally recognized by the majority of the Paleolithic community, such as those from the Dingcun, Lantian and Bose sites. The available ages of the Bose Paleolithic tools are naturally a contradiction to the “Movius line”.
Continuous investigation is being carried out at Bose, which is expected to provide further new ev- idence on the main issues.Discussion in the field would be greatly helpful for clarifying some of these issues. We cordially invite Lin to realize a first visit to Bose, and are looking forward to his contribution.
相似文献
Most of the questions of Lin are centered on the relations of the tektites, stone artifacts and the stratigraphy. These had already been raised in the comments of Koeberl et al (vol.289, no. 5479, p507a, title :Tektites and the Age Paradox in Mid-Pleistocene China) and replied in detail in July 2000 in the same issue. Since then, further investigations have been carried out at Bose and there has not been any new evidence affecting our earlier interpretations, which are also supported by the lack of stone artifacts on the terraces younger than T4. It should be clarified that the stone tools discovered at the upper-most part of T4 at some localities are of Neolithic age, rather than Paleolithic. Thus, the statement of Lin about two possible generations of Paleolithic layers is not supported but should be further studied. Lin questioned in his past publications the existence of handaxe in the Paleolithic of China while typical handaxes in China have been internationally recognized by the majority of the Paleolithic community, such as those from the Dingcun, Lantian and Bose sites. The available ages of the Bose Paleolithic tools are naturally a contradiction to the “Movius line”.
Continuous investigation is being carried out at Bose, which is expected to provide further new ev- idence on the main issues.Discussion in the field would be greatly helpful for clarifying some of these issues. We cordially invite Lin to realize a first visit to Bose, and are looking forward to his contribution.
相似文献
47.
48.
49.
东亚和早期人类第一次大迁徙浪潮 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
以欧、亚大陆一系列考古学重要地点的发现及新研究成果,勾勒出迄今所知早期人类走出其假想发祥地非洲的时空架构,并特别讨论了早期人类起源于东亚的可能性。 相似文献
50.
由泰国和美国科学家组成的泰国北部泰美考察团,于1984年12月在南邦府中部湄南河上源之一的汪河东岸(8°N,99°30′E附近)发现了三件石制品。这是继1974年报道该地区发现相同层位的石制品以来的第三次发现,消息登载在1986年6月美国《当代人类学》(Current Anthropology)杂志第27卷第3期上。 三件石制品中两件用砂岩砾石、一件用砾岩砾石制成,一端或一侧有简单但明确无误的人工打制痕迹。较大的一件长11.4、宽7.2、断面约厚4.4cm。另两件稍小。它们均出自更新世早、中 相似文献