Axial ligands of chloroplast cytochrome b-559: identification and requirement for a heme-cross-linked polypeptide structure

Optical, resonance Raman, and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopies have been used to characterize the ligands and spin state of the chloroplast cytochrome b-559. The protein was isolated from both maize and spinach in a low-potential form. The spectroscopic data indicate that the heme iron in both ferric and ferrous cytochrome b-559 is in its low-spin state and ligated in its fifth and sixth coordination positions by histidine nitrogens. Electron paramagnetic resonance data for the purified spinach cytochrome are in good agreement with those determined by Bergstr?m and V?nng?rd [Bergstr?m, J., & V?nng?rd, T. (1982) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 682, 452-456] for a low-potential membrane-bound form of cytochrome b-559. The g values of high-potential cytochrome b-559 are shifted from those of its low-potential forms; this shift is interpreted as arising from a deviation of the planes of the two axial histidine imidazole rings from a parallel orientation. The model is consistent with the physical data and may also account for the facility with which cytochrome b-559 can be converted between low- and high-potential forms. Recent biochemical and molecular biological data [Widger, W. R., Cramer, W. A., Hermodson, M., Meyer, D., & Gullifor, M. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 3870-3876; Herrmann, R. G., Alt, J., Schiller, D., Cramer, W. A., & Widger, W. R. (1984) FEBS Lett. 179, 239-244] have shown that two polypeptides, one with 83 residues and a second with 39 residues, most likely constitute the protein of the cytochrome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Chromosome behavior and cell lineage in triploid and mosaic salivary glands of species hybrids in Sciara

Summary A study of the salivary glands of triploid hybrids between females of Sciara ocellaris and males of Sciara reynoldsi throws light on several problems concerning chromosome behavior, species relationships and embryonic development. The specimens studied possess two sets of ocellaris chromosomes and one set of reynoldsi chromosomes. Three types of conditions are represented; 2X3A; 3X3A; and a mosaic possessing cells of both kinds.Heterozygosity of chromosome band pattern in the hybrids shows that the ocellaris homologs are not true sisters and that the sperm probably united with a diploid fusion nucleus composed of two polar bodies and not with the oötid nucleus. This indicates strongly that in a previously described diploid hybrid mosaic some cells developed parthenogenetically from such a fusion nucleus, while others were biparental in origin. The evidence supports the view that the initial influences or reactions of the foreign reynoldsi sperm differ from those of the ocellaris sperm immediately after entry into the egg, but that then and later the differences are relatively slight, although numerous. This agrees with our earlier evidence from the hybrids in indicating that the two parental species are separated genetically, as well as in chromosome band pattern, by many small differences.Species-specific characteristics of chromosome behavior are described which retain their specificity in the hybrids.The 2X3A cells lack a reynoldsi X. The double ocellaris X in such cells (including those in the mosaic) exhibits the peculiar features manifest by the single X in ordinary diploid XO males in the pure species (and in many other Diptera). It is pale and diffuse in structural appearance, and throughout its entire length is uniformly much greater in diameter than it is in the 3X3A cells. The possible significance of this behavior is discussed in relation to problems of sex determination (e. g., Bridges' ratio theory) and those concerning time of gene action. The structural resemblance to the puffs and bulbs found in salivary gland chromosomes is striking and raises the question as to how far morphological characteristics of chromosomes can be used as criteria of gene activity. The double X in the 2X cells of the mosaic, surrounded by 3X cells, exhibits the same peculiarities as those in a pure 2X3A male-type specimen, indicating that we are dealing with intracellular, not intercellular phenomena.Conditions in the mosaic gland support the evidence from the diploid hybrids (some described here for the first time) in indicating that the salivary gland is formed by differentiation of cells which happen to lie in the proper region, regardless of their ancestry. The triploid mosaic specimen (and also a diploid mosaic) is presumed to be a female in which the normal male-producing type of chromosome elimination occurred in one or more mitotic divisions during cleavage or later.     

Asp85 is the only internal aspartic acid that gets protonated in the M intermediate and the purple-to-blue transition of bacteriorhodopsin. A solid-state 13C CP-MAS NMR investigation.

High-resolution solid-state 13C NMR spectra of the ground state and M intermediate of the bacteriorhodopsin mutant D96N with the isotope label at [4-13C]Asp and [11-13C]Trp were recorded. The NMR spectra show that Asp85 is protonated in the M intermediate. The environment of Asp85 is quite hydrophobic. On the other hand, Asp212 remains deprotonated and a slight shift to lower field indicates a more hydrophilic environment. Asp85 also protonates in the purple-to-blue transition of bacteriorhodopsin in the deionized membrane, where it experiences a similar environment to M. The shift of Trp resonances in M reflect a conformational change of the protein in forming the M intermediate.     

The breakthrough paradox: How focusing on one form of innovation jeopardizes the advancement of science

Research needs a balance of risk‐taking in “breakthrough projects” and gradual progress. For building a sustainable knowledge base, it is indispensable to provide support for both. Subject Categories: Careers, Economics, Law & Politics, Science Policy & Publishing

Science is about venturing into the unknown to find unexpected insights and establish new knowledge. Increasingly, academic institutions and funding agencies such as the European Research Council (ERC) explicitly encourage and support scientists to foster risky and hopefully ground‐breaking research. Such incentives are important and have been greatly appreciated by the scientific community. However, the success of the ERC has had its downsides, as other actors in the funding ecosystem have adopted the ERC’s focus on “breakthrough science” and respective notions of scientific excellence. We argue that these tendencies are concerning since disruptive breakthrough innovation is not the only form of innovation in research. While continuous, gradual innovation is often taken for granted, it could become endangered in a research and funding ecosystem that places ever higher value on breakthrough science. This is problematic since, paradoxically, breakthrough potential in science builds on gradual innovation. If the value of gradual innovation is not better recognized, the potential for breakthrough innovation may well be stifled.

While continuous, gradual innovation is often taken for granted, it could become endangered in a research and funding ecosystem that places ever higher value on breakthrough science.

Concerns that the hypercompetitive dynamics of the current scientific system may impede rather than spur innovative research have been voiced for many years (Alberts et al, 2014). As performance indicators continue to play a central role for promotions and grants, researchers are under pressure to publish extensively, quickly, and preferably in high‐ranking journals (Burrows, 2012). These dynamics increase the risk of mental health issues among scientists (Jaremka et al, 2020), dis‐incentivise relevant and important work (Benedictus et al, 2016), decrease the quality of scientific papers (Sarewitz, 2016) and induce conservative and short‐term thinking rather than risk‐taking and original thinking required for scientific innovation (Alberts et al, 2014; Fochler et al, 2016). Against this background, strong incentives for fostering innovative and daring research are indispensable.     

Measuring the unknown: An estimator and simulation study for assessing case reporting during epidemics

The fraction of cases reported, known as ‘reporting’, is a key performance indicator in an outbreak response, and an essential factor to consider when modelling epidemics and assessing their impact on populations. Unfortunately, its estimation is inherently difficult, as it relates to the part of an epidemic which is, by definition, not observed. We introduce a simple statistical method for estimating reporting, initially developed for the response to Ebola in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), 2018–2020. This approach uses transmission chain data typically gathered through case investigation and contact tracing, and uses the proportion of investigated cases with a known, reported infector as a proxy for reporting. Using simulated epidemics, we study how this method performs for different outbreak sizes and reporting levels. Results suggest that our method has low bias, reasonable precision, and despite sub-optimal coverage, usually provides estimates within close range (5–10%) of the true value. Being fast and simple, this method could be useful for estimating reporting in real-time in settings where person-to-person transmission is the main driver of the epidemic, and where case investigation is routinely performed as part of surveillance and contact tracing activities.