Análisis de la sedación paliativa en pacientes mayores hospitalizados: efectividad de un protocolo

ObjectiveTo measure changes in the practice of palliative sedation during agony in hospitalised elderly patients before and after the implementation of a palliative sedation protocol.Material and methodsA retrospective before-after study was performed in hospitalised patients over 65 years old who received midazolam during hospital admission and died in the hospital in two 3-month periods, before and after the implementation of the protocol. Non-sedative uses of midazolam and patients in intensive care were excluded. Patient and admission characteristics, the consent process, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments, and the sedation process (refractory symptom treated, drug doses, assessment and use of other drugs) were recorded. Association was analysed using the Chi² and Student t tests.ResultsA total of 143 patients were included, with no significant differences between groups in demographic characteristics or symptoms. Do not resuscitate (DNR) orders were recorded in approximately 70% of the subjects of each group, and informed consent for sedation was recorded in 91% before vs. 84% after the protocol. Induction and maintenance doses of midazolam followed protocol recommendations in 1.3% before vs 10.4% after the protocol was implemented (P=.02) and adequate rescue doses were used in 1.3% vs 11.9% respectively (P=.01). Midazolam doses were significantly lower (9.86 mg vs 18.67 mg, P<.001) when the protocol was used than when it was not used. Ramsay sedation score was used in 8% vs. 12% and the Palliative Care Team was involved in 35.5% and 16.4% of the cases (P=.008) before and after the protocol, respectively.ConclusionsUse of midazolam slightly improved after the implementation of a hospital protocol on palliative sedation. The percentage of adequate sedations and the general process of sedation were mostly unchanged by the protocol. More education and further assessment is needed to gauge the effect of these measures in the future.     

Análisis de biopsias líquidas para el diagnóstico del cáncer: revisión sistemática

The incidence of cancer has increased in recent years, especially in those over 65 years of age, posing a major health problem. Many tumours have a poor prognosis because they are diagnosed at very advanced stages. It is therefore especially important to incorporate liquid biopsy into clinical practice as a method for detecting tumours at very early stages. A systematic review was conducted, with the main objective of analysing the available literature on the use of liquid biopsy in the early diagnosis of cancer, and as a secondary objective, to determine the types of tumours that can be diagnosed early by liquid biopsy and the available biomarkers. The results indicate a lack of agreement with the biomarkers detected and the technologies applied. This highlights the need for multicentre studies to look at large cohorts and to establish protocols of action, as well as to increase analytical validity and the possibility of using a screening test for each type of tumour. This could be a very important step forward, as it could improve the management of cancer patients to a great extent.     

Impacto de la hospitalización en pacientes centenarios ingresados por enfermedad aguda. Descripción de una serie de 165 casos y comparación con la literatura

IntroductionThe number of centenarians is increasing with the aging of the Spanish population. This age group might present different clinical features from younger groups. This study was carried out to determine the impact hospital admission on centenarians with an acute disease.Materials and methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted that included patients ≥100 years-old admitted from 1995 to 2016 to a third level university hospital and attended by the Geriatrics department in the acute ward, the Orthogeriatric ward, and by request. An analysis was made using the clinical-administrative databases containing information about the demographics, clinical, functional and cognitive features, length of hospital length, as well as discharge destination.ResultsThe study included 165 patients with a mean age of 101.6 ± 1.7 (range 100-109) years, of whom 140 (85%) were female. The mean hospital stay was 10.3 ± 7.4 days. Respiratory infections (41%) were the most common cause of admission to the Acute Geriatric Unit (AGU). The overall in-hospital mortality was 16%, but mortality in AGU reached up to 31%. There was an increase on moderate-severe functional disability (51% to 96%), and on the inability to walk independently (52% to 99%) from baseline to admission. There was a reduction in people living in their own home from 71% prior to admission to 29% at hospital discharge.ConclusionsCentenarians who required hospital admission showed a high rate of mortality, a significant deterioration in their functional capacity, and a decrease in their chances of going back to their own home at discharge.     

Repercusión de un sistema centralizado de ingresos sobre la eficacia y eficiencia de una unidad geriátrica de recuperación funcional

ObjectiveTo evaluate the influence of a change in the management of admissions on the activity and care outcomes of a Geriatric Functional Recovery Unit (GFRU).Material and methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted. Since 2000, the Hospital Central Cruz Roja GFRU has been collecting data grouped into periods of 4 years, except for the centralised admissions (September 2016-December 2018). The data collected on admission included the Red Cross Functional and Mental scales, the Barthel index, the main diagnosis of the functional decline (grouped into stroke, orthopaedic problem, and multifactorial immobility episodes), and comorbidity evaluated by the Charlson index. The following outcome variables were analysed: the overall and relative functional gain at discharge; length of hospital stay; the functional efficiency, discharges to nursing homes, and transfers to acute care units. An analysis was made of the relationship between the admissions from the centralised unit and the previous period (directly admission managed by GFRU), using multivariate analysis (linear regression for continuous outcome variables and logistic regression for the dichotomous ones), adjusted for admission variables.ResultsPatients admitted from the centralised unit showed a greater overall and relative functional gain (difference between both means: 3.49 points, 95% CI; 1.65-5.33, and 12.41%, 95% CI; 0.74-24.08, respectively), longer stay (12.92 days, 95% CI; 11.54-14.30) and lower efficiency (−0.36, 95% CI; −0.16 to −0.57), higher risk of institutionalisation (OR 1.61, 95% CI; 1.19-2.16), and transfers to acute care units (OR 3.16, 95% CI; 2.24-4.47).ConclusionsA centralised admissions system had an influence on the improvement of functional parameters in the patients, but with a longer length of hospital stay, and lower efficiency. Increases in institutionalisation at discharge and transfers to acute care units were also observed.