Assessment of Inpatient Fragility Fracture Education and Outpatient Follow-Up at an Urban Tertiary Care Institution

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of inpatient fragility fracture education on follow-up care at an urban tertiary care center with a multidisciplinary inpatient education and follow-up initiative.MethodsParticipants included 139 patients with lowenergy fragility fractures who were identified, educated, and referred for follow-up by a coordinator. Education consisted of an initial 30 to 40-minute session with the patient and family followed by 10-minute sessions on subsequent hospitalization days. Follow-up activities with primary care physicians (PCPs) and orthopaedic surgeons were documented.ResultsOf the 129 patients still living at the end of the study period, 74 (57%) had followed up with their PCP while 93 (72%) had returned to see their orthopaedic surgeons. Women were 2.7 times more likely than men to address the cause of the fragility fracture (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-6.97; P = .038) and were 6.18 times more likely to receive treatment or to have bone mineral density (BMD) testing (95% CI, 1.29-29.61; P = .023). Patients previously treated for osteoporosis were 3 times more likely to follow-up with their PCPs (95% CI, 1.10- 8.02; P = .02), while patients who had previous BMD tests were 4.9 times more likely to follow-up (95% CI, 1.89- 12.79; P = .001). We observed a 42% reduction in the likelihood of seeing a physician for osteoporosis evaluation for each additional 10 years of age (95% CI, 13%-61% reduction in odds; P = .008).ConclusionIn the urban setting, follow-up rates are not sufficiently improved by inpatient education. Improved, persistent communication between the orthopaedic surgeon, PCP, and patient is needed to effectively treat patients and prevent future fractures. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:58-68)     

四肢骨折矫形术后患者慢性手术后疼痛的发生率及其危险因素分析

目的:研究四肢骨折矫形术后患者慢性手术后疼痛的发生率及其危险因素。方法:以2014年12月-2017年10月于我院接受四肢骨折矫形术患者300例为研究对象,于术后6个月分析慢性手术后疼痛的发生率。收集所有患者年龄、性别、体重、术前疼痛程度、二次手术、麻醉方式、术后镇痛、术后引流、合并骨质疏松、骨折类型以及骨折部位等资料,并采用单因素以及多因素Logistic回归分析术后疼痛的危险因素。结果:术后6个月内有96名患者术后发生慢性手术后疼痛,发生率为32.00%(96/300)。单因素分析结果显示:慢性手术后疼痛患者与术前疼痛程度、是否二次手术、麻醉方式、术后有无镇痛、是否合并骨质疏松、骨折类型、骨折部位有关(P0.05),与患者的性别、年龄、体重、术后是否引流无关(P0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示:术前重度疼痛、二次手术、麻醉方式为非全麻、术后无镇痛、合并骨质疏松、开放性骨折以及下肢骨折均是四肢骨折矫形术后发生慢性手术后疼痛的独立危险因素(P0.05)。结论:四肢骨折矫形术后患者慢性手术后疼痛的发生率较高,术前重度疼痛、二次手术、麻醉方式为非全麻、术后无镇痛、合并骨质疏松、开放性骨折以及下肢骨折均增加了慢性手术后疼痛的发生风险,临床应根据危险因素给予针对性的干预措施。     

内固定与关节置换手术治疗骨质疏松性髋部骨折的临床效果及术后并发症的影响因素分析

目的:分析内固定与关节置换手术治疗骨质疏松性髋部骨折的临床效果及其术后并发症的影响因素。方法:将2017年4月至2018年5月因骨质疏松性髋部骨折于我院进行手术治疗的78例患者作为研究对象,参考患者自身意愿按照采取手术方案的不同将所有患者分为内固定组与关节置换组。内固定组主要采用动力髋螺钉内固定治疗;关节置换组采用全髋关节置换术治疗。对比分析两组治疗后并发症的发生情况及关节功能恢复程度。结果:关节置换组手术治疗后关节功能的恢复情况显著优于内固定组(P0.05),术后并发症发生率低于内固定组(P0.05);患者术后并发症发生的主要影响因素包括:术前存在合并症、手术时机≥2h、采用内固定手术。结论:与内固定术相比,关节置换手术治疗骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者的疗效和安全性均更高,但采用该手术治疗时需注意手术操作的规范性及手术时机。     

Osteoporosis Treatment After Osteoporotic Fractures: Data From a Single Medical Center

ObjectiveMost patients do not receive osteoporosis treatment after osteoporotic fracture. This study reviewed osteoporosis treatment after osteoporotic fractures in a center without a Fracture Liaison Service.MethodsWe identified all patients with hip, vertebral, humeral or radial fractures, evaluated in Meir Medical Center, in 2017. The exclusion criteria were not a Clalit Health Services member, high-energy fracture or 30-day postoperative mortality. The primary endpoint was osteoporosis drugs issued within 12 months of fracture. Secondary endpoints included bone densitometry and 1-year mortality.ResultsFive-hundred-eighty-two patients (average age 78.6 ± 11.1 years, 75.8% women) were included. There were 321 (55.5%) hip, 84 (14.1%) humeral, 33 (5.6%) vertebral, and 144 (24.7%) radial fractures. Osteoporosis drugs were issued to 26.5% of the patients; those with humeral fractures received the least (21.4%) and vertebral, the most (30.3%; P = .51). Bone densitometry was performed in 23.2% of patients. One-year mortality after hip fracture was 12.1%, followed by humeral (3.6%; P < .05). Logistic regression showed that previous treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–15.2), bone densitometry (OR = 4.4; 95% CI 2.6–7.4) and endocrinology visit (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4–4.6) were the most important factors associated with treatment.ConclusionFewer than one third of patients received pharmacotherapy within 1 year after fracture. Because pharmacotherapy reduces future fractures and mortality, we recommend that medical staff who care for patients with fracture adopt practical and effective strategies to increase treatment rates among patients with osteoporotic fractures.     

Predictors of Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Males and Females with Hip Fracture - A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Background

Hip fracture is associated with increased mortality. Our aim was to study potential risk factors, including osteoporosis, associated with short- and long-term mortality in a prospectively recruited cohort of fragility hip fracture patients.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Fragility hip fracture patients aged >50 years admitted to a county hospital in Southern Norway in 2004 and 2005 were consecutively identified and invited for assessment. Patients with high energy or pathological fractures, patients with confusion, serious infections or who were non-residents in the catchment area were excluded. As part of a clinical routine, data were collected using questionnaires. Standardized bone density measurements of lumbar spine and hip were performed. Potential predictors of hip fracture mortality were tested using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 432 hip fracture patients (129 males and 303 females) were prospectively identified. Among them 296 (85 males and 211 females) patients [mean age 80.7 (SD 9.1)] were assessed at the Osteoporosis center. Variables independently associated with short-term mortality (after 1 year) were in females older age [Odds Ratio (OR) 6.95] and in males older age (OR 5.74) and pulmonary disease (OR 3.20), whereas no associations were observed with mortality for 3 months after the fragility hip fracture. Variables independently associated with 5 years mortality in males was osteoporosis (OR 3.91) and older age (OR 6.95), and in females was dementia (OR 4.16) and older age (OR 2.80).

Conclusion

Apart from known predictors as age and comorbidity osteoporosis in our study was identified as a potential independent predictor of long-term hip fracture mortality in males. This is of particular importance as treatment with bisphosphonates after hip fracture has been shown to reduce hip fracture mortality and may be a clinical target to reduce the burden of the disease. Further studies however are needed to confirm the validity of this finding.     

A Simple Intervention for Improving the Implementation Rate of a Recommended Osteoporosis Treatment After Hip Fracture

ObjectiveOsteoporosis is often under-treated, and hip fracture is frequently its first manifestation. Hospitalization for a hip fracture is an opportunity to initiate osteoporosis treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a simple intervention improves the implementation rate of a recommended osteoporosis treatment.MethodsOne hundred elderly patients admitted with low-impact hip fracture were given a 10 minute explanation about osteoporosis and its treatment during their postoperative hospital stay. In addition, the patients received an explanatory brochure and a letter to their primary care physician that included an article on fracture rate reduction with osteoporosis treatment. Implementation of therapy was assessed by a telephone survey 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The patients who had not received treatment at 3 months were given a repeated explanation. The historical control group was comprised of 100 hip fracture patients with similar demographic characteristics, who were operated on and discharged with the standard care recommendations for osteoporosis prevention.ResultsAt the 3 month follow-up, the therapy rate in both groups was similar (19%). Fifty-eight percent of the patients in the study group had no recollection of the intervention. However, after a repeated explanation, at the 6 month follow-up, 39% of the intervention group had received drug therapy for fracture prevention (P<.001).ConclusionA simple intervention enlisting the patients' help to involve their primary care physician can increase treatment rates for osteoporosis following a hip fracture. During the immediate postoperative period, the patients and their families have difficulty implementing the recommendations. Therefore, repeated communications are recommended. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:46-50)     

Factores pronósticos de mortalidad al año de una fractura de cadera por fragilidad ósea. Estudio Maluc Anoia

IntroductionMost of the patients who had a hip fragility fracture are characterized by advanced age, frailty, multimorbidity and high mortality rate into the first year. Our aim is to describe the prognostic factors of mortality one year after a hip fragility fracture.Material and methodsObservational prospective study. During the study period we included patients older than 69 years with hip fragility fracture who were admitted to the Acute Geriatric Unit.ResultsWe have followed 364 patients, 100 of them died (27.5%). The independent prognostic factors of mortality one year after a hip fragility fracture had been: have a less basis score in Lawton and Brody Scale 0.603 (0.505-0.721) (p< 0.001); have a higher score in Charlson Comorbidity Index 2.332 (1.308-4.157) p = 0.04); have a surgical waiting time ≥ 3 days 3.013 (1.330-6.829) p = 0.008); finding hydroelectrolytic disorders and/or deterioration of glomerular filtration 1.212 (1.017-1.444) p = 0.031) during hospital stay; discriminatory capacity of the area under the curve (AUC) (± 95%): 0.888 (0.880-0.891).ConclusionsPrognostic predictors of mortality at one year after a hip fragility fracture are those variables that reflect a worse state of health, complications during hospital stay and a longer surgical waiting time.     

Treatment of Osteoporosis and Prevention of New Fractures: Role of Intravenously Administered Bisphosphonates

ObjectiveTo evaluate the usefulness of intravenously administered bisphosphonates for improving absorption, tolerability, adherence, and outcomes in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis.MethodsData published from 1996 to 2009 relevant to the treatment of osteoporosis, with emphasis on bisphosphonates, fracture risk, adherence to therapy, frequency of dosing, intravenous treatment, tolerability, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life, were reviewed.ResultsAlthough bisphosphonates are currently the standard of care for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporosis in men, oral formulations are associated with poor absorption and potential irritation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. These issues necessitate complicated and restrictive dosing regimens, which in turn lead to poor compliance and persistence. Intravenous formulations such as 3 mg of ibandronate given quarterly and 5 mg of zoledronic acid administered once yearly avoid problems relating to absorption and tolerability by bypassing the gastrointestinal tract. Intravenously administered ibandronate is presumed (by virtue of similar or superior improvements in bone mineral density) to have antifracture efficacy similar to that of orally administered ibandronate given daily, which has been shown to produce significant reductions in vertebral fractures during a 3-year period in comparison with placebo. Zoledronic acid, 5 mg once yearly, has been shown to produce a significant reduction in the risk of morphometric vertebral fractures, clinical vertebral fractures, hip fractures, and nonvertebral fractures versus placebo during a 3-year interval in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and also to yield a significantly decreased risk for new clinical fractures versus placebo in patients with recent low-trauma hip fracture. Both agents have favorable safety and tolerability profiles.ConclusionIntravenously administered bisphosphonates have the potential to increase compliance and persistence with therapy in patients with osteoporosis and to improve patient outcomes. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:483-493)     

Malnutrition is Common and Increases the Risk of Adverse Medical Events in Older Adults With Femoral Fragility Fractures

BackgroundFemoral fragility fractures are one of the most common injuries managed by orthopedic surgeons. Malnutrition influences the poor outcomes observed in this population. Our purpose was to assess the annual trends of malnutrition diagnosis and determine risk factors for malnutrition and complications in patients 65 years and older presenting with femoral fragility fractures. We hypothesized that malnutrition would increase the risk of postoperative wound infection, wound dehiscence, non-union, and mortality.MethodsThe PearlDiver database was reviewed from 2010 to 2020. Patients ≥ 65-years-old with femur fractures treated with operative fixation were identified by CPT code. A preoperative diagnosis of malnourished state was defined by ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes and patients were divided into malnourished and non-malnourished cohorts. Patients were tracked for one year following operative fixation of a femoral fragility fracture for the occurrence of infection, wound dehiscence, nonunion and mortality. The rates of these complications were compared between malnourished and nonmalnourished cohorts.ResultsThere were 178,283 total femoral fragility fractures identified in patients aged 65-years or older. The overall prevalence of malnutrition diagnosis in this geriatric population was 12.8%. Documented malnutrition in femoral fragility fractures increased from 1.6% to 32.9% from 2010-2020 (P<0.0001). Compared to patients without malnutrition, patients with malnutrition are at increased risk of mortality (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.2558 – 1.3752, p < 0.0001), are more likely to develop a wound infection (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.252 – 1.7626; p < 0.0001), more likely to have a wound dehiscence (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.3416 – 1.7949; p < 0.0001), and more likely to develop non-union (1.89; 95% CI 1.6946 – 2.1095; p < 0.0001). Multiple demographic variables were associated with malnutrition diagnosis including higher age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, female sex, dementia, and institutionalization. Parkinson’s disease, feeding difficulty and institutionalization demographic variables had the highest risk of malnutrition.ConclusionThe current study found that malnutrition diagnosis significantly increases the risk of adverse medical events in elderly adults with femoral fragility fractures. The rates of malnutrition increased steadily from 2010-2020. This trend is likely a result of increased awareness and testing for malnutrition, not reflecting an actual increased prevalence of malnutrition. Multiple expected demographic variables are associated with diagnosis of malnutrition. Level of Evidence: III     

Consensus and Controversy Regarding Osteoporosis in the Pediatric Population

ObjectiveTo review current consensus and controversy surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in childhood and adolescence.MethodsThe medical literature was reviewed with emphasis on the importance of early skeletal health, risk factors for bone fragility, and the diagnosis and management of children at risk for osteoporosis.ResultsChildhood and adolescence are critical periods for optimizing bone growth and mineral accrual. Bone strength is determined by bone size, geometry, quality, and mass—variables that are influenced by genetic factors, activity, nutrition, and hormones. For children with genetic skeletal disorders or chronic disease, bone growth and mineral accrual may be compromised, increasing the lifetime risk of osteoporosis. The goal for the clinician is to identify children at greatest risk for future fragility fracture. Bone densitometry and turnover markers are challenging to interpret in children. Prevention and treatment of bone fragility in children are less well established than in adults. Optimizing nutrition and activity may not restore bone health, but the drug armamentarium is limited. Sex steroid replacement has not proven effective in restoring bone mass in patients with anorexia nervosa or exercise-associated amenorrhea. Bisphosphonates can increase bone mass and may reduce bone pain and fractures, most convincingly in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Further studies are needed to establish the safety, efficacy, and optimal drug, duration, and dosage in pediatric patients.ConclusionBone health during the first 2 decades contributes to the lifetime risk of osteoporosis. Further research is needed to develop evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in childhood. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:513-520)     

Management of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis or osteopenia occurs in about 44 million Americans, resulting in 1.5 million fragility fractures per year. The consequences of these fractures include pain, disability, depression, loss of independence, and increased mortality. The burden to the healthcare system, in terms of cost and resources, is tremendous, with an estimated direct annual USA healthcare expenditure of about $17 billion. With longer life expectancy and the aging of the baby-boomer generation, the number of men and women with osteoporosis or low bone density is expected to rise to over 61 million by 2020. Osteoporosis is a silent disease that causes no symptoms until a fracture occurs. Any fragility fracture greatly increases the risk of future fractures. Most patients with osteoporosis are not being diagnosed or treated. Even those with previous fractures, who are at extremely high risk of future fractures, are often not being treated. It is preferable to diagnose osteoporosis by bone density testing of high risk individuals before the first fracture occurs. If osteoporosis or low bone density is identified, evaluation for contributing factors should be considered. Patients on long-term glucocorticoid therapy are at especially high risk for developing osteoporosis, and may sustain fractures at a lower bone density than those not taking glucocorticoids. All patients should be counseled on the importance of regular weight-bearing exercise and adequate daily intake of calcium and vitamin D. Exposure to medications that cause drowsiness or hypotension should be minimized. Non-pharmacologic therapy to reduce the non-skeletal risk factors for fracture should be considered. These include fall prevention through balance training and muscle strengthening, removal of fall hazards at home, and wearing hip protectors if the risk of falling remains high. Pharmacologic therapy can stabilize or increase bone density in most patients, and reduce fracture risk by about 50%. By selecting high risk patients for bone density testing it is possible to diagnose this disease before the first fracture occurs, and initiate appropriate treatment to reduce the risk of future fractures.     

Guías de práctica clínica para la evaluación y tratamiento de la osteoporosis asociada a enfermedades endocrinas y nutricionales

ObjectiveTo provide practical recommendations for evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis associated to endocrine diseases and nutritional conditions.ParticipantsMembers of the Bone Metabolism Working Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology, a methodologist, and a documentalist.MethodsRecommendations were formulated according to the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. A systematic search was made in MEDLINE (Pubmed), using the following terms associated to the name of each condition: AND “osteoporosis”, “fractures”, “bone mineral density”, and “treatment”. Papers in English with publication date before 18 October 2011 were included. Current evidence for each disease was reviewed by two group members, and doubts related to the review process or development of recommendations were resolved by the methodologist. Finally, recommendations were discussed in a meeting of the Working Group.ConclusionsThe document provides evidence-based practical recommendations for evaluation and management of endocrine and nutritional diseases associated to low bone mass or an increased risk of fracture. For each disease, the associated risk of low bone mass and fragility fractures is given, recommendations for bone mass assessment are provided, and treatment options that have shown to be effective for increasing bone mass and/or to decreasing fragility fractures are listed.     

Physician-Patient Communication in the Orthopedic Clinic: Surgeon-Identified Challenges

BackgroundEffective communication between the physician and the patient is crucial to quality healthcare. The orthopedic surgery clinic setting provides an environment for cultivating the physician-patient relationship, eliciting diagnostic data, and developing treatment strategies. However, little is known about the orthopedic surgeon perspective on communicating with patients. The purpose of the study was to identify patient communication and care issues faced in the orthopedic surgery clinic setting that physicians categorize as challenging.MethodsAll surgeons in the department of orthopedics in a large tertiary care center were invited to respond to an online survey on common communication challenges. Physicians were asked to rate 13 challenges identified by the literature and opinion leaders using a four-point Likert scale ranging from “Not at all challenging” to “Extremely challenging”. In addition, the survey included open ended questions regarding common challenges in communicating with patients and types of encounters, and thematic analysis was applied. Mean scores were calculated.ResultsNineteen orthopedic surgeons completed the survey and were included in the analysis. Orthopedic surgeons identified misaligned expectations for surgical intervention for a nonsurgical diagnosis as the most challenging encounter in the clinic (16/19). Managing postoperative patient expectations (14/19) and communicating with patients who were dissatisfied with their surgical outcome (13/19) were also commonly rated as particularly challenging. Open ended responses echoed these ratings and additional difficulty facilitating patient understanding of complex information as common communication challenges.ConclusionCommon challenges in the orthopedic clinic often surround managing patient expectations and providing effective explanations, particularly where physicians perceive a surgical intervention as inappropriate for addressing the patient complaint. Identifying these issues can guide training efforts to help orthopedic physicians in managing these and improving communication. These findings can also provide basis for collecting information about communication challenges from orthopedic surgeons across institutions. Level of Evidence: IV     

Development and delivery of patient treatment in the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial. A new geriatric in-hospital pathway for elderly patients with hip fracture

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are common among frail elderly persons and often have serious consequences on function, mobility and mortality. Traditional treatment of these patients is performed in orthopedic departments without additional geriatric assessment. However, studies have shown that interdisciplinary geriatric treatment may be beneficial compared to traditional treatment. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether treatment of these patients in a Department of Geriatrics (DG) during the entire hospital stay gives additional benefits as compared to conventional treatment in a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (DOS). FINDINGS: A new clinical pathway for in-hospital treatment of hip fracture patients was developed. In this pathway patients were treated pre-and postoperatively in DG. Comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed as an interdisciplinary, multidimensional, systematic assessment of all patients focusing on each patient's capabilities and limitations as recommended in guidelines and systematic reviews. Identification and treatment of co-morbidities, pain relief, hydration, oxygenation, nutrition, elimination, prevention and management of delirium, assessment of falls and osteoporosis were emphasized. Discharge planning started as early as possible. Initiation of rehabilitation with focus on early mobilisation and development of individual plans was initiated in hospital and continued after discharge from hospital. Fracture specific treatment was based upon standard treatment for the hospital, expert opinions and a review of the literature. CONCLUSION: A new treatment program for old hip fracture patients was developed, introduced and run in the DG, the potential benefits of which being compared with traditional care of hip fracture patients in the DOS in a randomised clinical trial.     

Orthopedic-Metabolic Collaborative Management for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture

Objective: Osteoporotic hip fractures are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and secondary fractures. Although osteoporosis treatment can reduce future fracture risk, patients often do not receive it. We report results of a coordinator-less fracture liaison service in Israel addressing hip fracture patients. The primary endpoint was attending the Metabolic Clinic. Secondary endpoints included vitamin D measurement, calcium and vitamin D recommendations, initiation of osteoporosis treatment, and mortality 1-year post-fracture.Methods: This prospective study included 219 hip fracture patients who were compared with historical controls. Data on hospitalized patients were collected before and after implementation of a structured protocol for hip fracture patients, led by a multidisciplinary team, without a coordinator.Results: The study included 219 and 218 patients ≥60 years old who were operated on in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Metabolic Clinic visits increased from 6.4 to 40.2% after the intervention (P<.001). Among 14 patients who attended the Clinic in 2012, 85.7% began osteoporosis therapy; among 88 who attended in 2013, 45.5% were treated at the first visit. Vitamin D measurements and calcium and vitamin D supplementation increased postintervention (0.5–80.1%, P<.001; 30.8–84.7%, P<.001, respectively). Patients receiving osteoporosis medications had lower mortality rates than untreated patients (4.3% vs. 21.8%).Conclusion: An Orthopedic-Metabolic team implemented by existing staff without a coordinator can improve osteoporosis care for hip fracture patients. Yet, gaps remain as only 40% had Metabolic Clinic follow-up postintervention, and of these, only half received specific treatment recommendations. Hospitals are encouraged to adopt secondary fracture prevention protocols and continuously improve them to close the gaps between current management and appropriate metabolic assessment and treatment.Abbreviations: CHS = Clalit Health Services; CI = confidence interval; FLS = fracture liaison service; HMO = health maintenance organization; OR = odds ratio     

Spontaneous incomplete transverse subtrochanteric femoral fracture with cortical thickening possibly secondary to risedronate use: a case report

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is an asymptomatic disease characterized by bone weakening and predisposition to fragility (insufficiency) fractures and can have devastating effects on individual life and great financial impact on the economy. Bisphosphonates are used worldwide for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. However, increasing evidence raises concern that bisphosphonates can be associated with atypical fractures. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old Caucasian woman on long-term steroid treatment for polymyalgia rheumatica was admitted with severe and constant pain in the right hip, radiating to the right knee. She had a history of steroid-induced osteoporosis, for which she was started on risedronate four years earlier. She had no history of trauma. Her blood results were unremarkable. Her X-rays confirmed that she had an incomplete right subtrochanteric femoral fracture. A bone scan confirmed the diagnosis and also ruled out any other associated fractures. Our patient successfully underwent internal nail fixation of the fracture. She was reviewed by a rheumatology team, which stopped the risedronate. She was started on treatment with denosumab injection. CONCLUSIONS: Previous case series have reported that long-term bisphosphonate use is associated with atypical fractures of the femur, and certain criteria have been established to help identify such rare fractures. Delayed union or non-union is expected in such fractures following definitive orthopedic treatment because of the long half life of bisphosphonates. In this case report, we try to raise questions related to this important subject, like the duration and safety of bisphosphonate use and the alternative medications used in osteoporosis in this rare condition. We consider this case report not only interesting but also important and unusual because it is about a patient who developed a potentially rare and serious side effect of long-term bisphosphonate use, estimated to affect 2.3 in every 10,000 patients, and who presented with a pelvic X-ray that showed the characteristic features of atypical fractures secondary to risedronate use. In addition, most of the documented cases have been associated with many years of bisphosphonate use whereas our patient had been on risedronate for only four years.     

Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 y el confinamiento estricto de la población en la incidencia de fractura de cadera en España. Una revisión sistemática

Background and objectiveDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, a strict population confinement was decreed in Spain. In a situation of health crisis and health system saturation, knowledge of pathologies whose treatment cannot be delayed is of great importance for the correct management of resources and processes. The objective was to determine the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the strict population confinement on hip fracture incidence in Spain.Material and methodSystematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. Search in Pubmed and Chocrane Library on 11/11/2022: hip fracture and COVID-19 and Spain.ResultsSix studies met the inclusion criteria, 50% showed a decrease in the hip fractures incidence during strict population confinement (all in Comunidad de Madrid hospitals), and in the other 50% there were no differences (all in other region hospitals). It was constant that hip fractures, either did not decrease, or decreased much less than the rest of fractures during the period of strict population confinement, increasing their relative number with respect to the total admissions in orthopedic surgery and traumatology.ConclusionsThe behavior of the hip fractures number during the strict population confinement decreed by the COVID-19 pandemic has not been symmetrical in all regions. To design and implement contingency plans in the event of a pandemic situation, these data must be taken into account in order to properly plan material and human resources.     

In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures

PurposeTo experimentally validate a non-linear finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach assessing in-vitro fracture risk at the proximal femur and to transfer the method to standard in-vivo multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) data of the hip aiming to predict additional hip fracture risk in subjects with and without osteoporosis associated vertebral fractures using bone mineral density (BMD) measurements as gold standard.MethodsOne fresh-frozen human femur specimen was mechanically tested and fractured simulating stance and clinically relevant fall loading configurations to the hip. After experimental in-vitro validation, the FEA simulation protocol was transferred to standard contrast-enhanced in-vivo MDCT images to calculate individual hip fracture risk each for 4 subjects with and without a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures matched by age and gender. In addition, FEA based risk factor calculations were compared to manual femoral BMD measurements of all subjects.ResultsIn-vitro simulations showed good correlation with the experimentally measured strains both in stance (R² = 0.963) and fall configuration (R² = 0.976). The simulated maximum stress overestimated the experimental failure load (4743 N) by 14.7% (5440 N) while the simulated maximum strain overestimated by 4.7% (4968 N). The simulated failed elements coincided precisely with the experimentally determined fracture locations. BMD measurements in subjects with a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures did not differ significantly from subjects without fragility fractures (femoral head: p = 0.989; femoral neck: p = 0.366), but showed higher FEA based risk factors for additional incident hip fractures (p = 0.028).ConclusionFEA simulations were successfully validated by elastic and destructive in-vitro experiments. In the subsequent in-vivo analyses, MDCT based FEA based risk factor differences for additional hip fractures were not mirrored by according BMD measurements. Our data suggests, that MDCT derived FEA models may assess bone strength more accurately than BMD measurements alone, providing a valuable in-vivo fracture risk assessment tool.     

Bone Mineral Density of the 1/3 Radius Refines Osteoporosis Diagnosis,Correlates With Prevalent Fractures,and Enhances Fracture Risk Estimates

ObjectiveTo investigate the added value of 1/3 radius (1/3R) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis by spine and hip sites and its correlation with prevalent fractures and predicted fracture risk.MethodsFracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores for hip and major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) with/without trabecular bone score were considered proxy for fracture risk. The contribution of 1/3R to risk prediction was depicted via linear regression models with FRAX score as the dependent variable—first only with central and then with radius T-score as an additional covariate. Significance of change in the explained variance was compared by F-test.ResultsThe study included 1453 patients, 86% women, aged 66 ± 10 years. A total of 32% (n = 471) were osteoporotic by spine/hip and 8% (n = 115) by radius only, constituting a 24.4% increase in the number of subjects defined as osteoporotic (n = 586, 40%). Prior fracture prevalence was similar among patients with osteoporosis by spine/hip (17.4%) and radius only (19.1%) (P = .77).FRAX prediction by a regression model using spine/hip T-score yielded explained variance of 51.8% and 49.9% for MOF and 39.8% and 36.4% for hip (with/without trabecular bone score adjustment, respectively). The contribution of 1/3R was statistically significant (P < .001) and slightly increased the explained variance to 52.3% and 50.4% for MOF and 40.9% and 37.4% for hip, respectively.ConclusionReclassification of BMD results according to radius measurements results in higher diagnostic output. Prior fractures were equally prevalent among patients with radius-only and classic-site osteoporosis. FRAX tool performance slightly improved by incorporating radius BMD. Whether this approach may lead to a better fracture prediction warrants further prospective evaluation.     

不同程度老年骨质疏松患者血清BALP、OPG/PYR比值变化及其与骨密度、骨折发生的相关性分析

摘要 目的：分析不同程度老年骨质疏松患者血清骨特异性碱性磷酸酶(BALP)、骨保护素(OPG)/吡啶啉(PYR)比值变化及其与骨密度、骨折发生的相关性。方法：选择我院自2020年11月至2023年7月接诊的70例老年骨质疏松患者作为观察组,其中轻-中度骨质疏松44例、重度骨质疏松26例;另选70例老年非骨质疏松者作为对照组。检测所有受试者血清BALP、OPG/PYR比值、腰椎、股骨颈和髋部的骨密度(BMD),分析BALP、OPG/PYR比值与不同骨骼部位BMD的关系,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析BALP、OPG/PYR比值对老年骨质疏松骨折的预测效能。结果：观察组血清BALP水平高于对照组,OPG/PYR比值小于对照组（P＜0.05）;重度骨质疏松组血清BALP水平高于轻-中度骨质疏松组,OPG/PYR比值小于轻-中度骨质疏松组（P＜0.05）;观察组腰椎、股骨颈及髋部的BMD均小于对照组（P＜0.05）;经Pearson相关性分析,腰椎、股骨颈及髋部的BMD与血清BALP水平呈负相关（P＜0.05）,与OPG/PYR比值呈正相关（P＜0.05）;经ROC曲线分析,血清BALP联合OPG/PYR比值预测老年骨质疏松骨折的AUC为0.890。结论：老年骨质疏松患者血清BALP水平升高、OPG/PYR比值减小,与病情严重程度及骨密度有关,联合预测骨折的效能较好,值得进一步研究应用。