How ATP hydrolysis controls filament assembly from profilin-actin: implication for formin processivity

Formins catalyze rapid filament growth from profilin-actin, by remaining processively bound to the elongating barbed end. The sequence of elementary reactions that describe filament assembly from profilin-actin at either free or formin-bound barbed ends is not fully understood. Specifically, the identity of the transitory complexes between profilin and actin terminal subunits is not known; and whether ATP hydrolysis is directly or indirectly coupled to profilin-actin assembly is not clear. We have analyzed the effect of profilin on actin assembly at free and FH1-FH2-bound barbed ends in the presence of ADP and non-hydrolyzable CrATP. Profilin blocked filament growth by capping the barbed ends in ADP and CrATP/ADP-Pi states, with a higher affinity when formin is bound. We confirm that, in contrast, profilin accelerates depolymerization of ADP-F-actin, more efficiently when FH1-FH2 is bound to barbed ends. To reconcile these data with effective barbed end assembly from profilin-MgATP-actin, the nature of nucleotide bound to both terminal and subterminal subunits must be considered. All data are accounted for quantitatively by a model in which a barbed end whose two terminal subunits consist of profilin-ATP-actin cannot grow until ATP has been hydrolyzed and Pi released from the penultimate subunit, thus promoting the release of profilin and allowing further elongation. Formin does not change the activity of profilin but simply uses it for its processive walk at barbed ends. Finally, if profilin release from actin is prevented by a chemical cross-link, formin processivity is abolished.     

Actin filament barbed end elongation with nonmuscle MgATP-actin and MgADP-actin in the presence of profilin

We have quantitated the in vitro interactions of profilin and the profilin-actin complex (PA) with the actin filament barbed end using profilin and nonmuscle beta,gamma-actin prepared from bovine spleen. Actin filament barbed end elongation was initiated from spectrin seeds in the presence of varying profilin concentrations and followed by light scattering. We find that profilin inhibits actin polymerization and that this effect is much more pronounced for beta,gamma-actin than for alpha-skeletal muscle actin. Profilin binds to beta,gamma-actin filament barbed ends with an equilibrium constant of 20 microM, decreases the filament elongation rate by blocking addition of actin monomers, and increases the dissociation rate of actin monomers from the filament end. PA containing bound MgADP supports elongation of the actin filament barbed end, indicating that ATP hydrolysis is not necessary for PA elongation of filaments. Initial analysis of the energetics for these reactions suggested an apparent greater negative free energy change for actin filament elongation from PA than elongation from monomeric actin. However, we calculate that the free energy changes for the two elongation pathways are equal if the profilin-induced weakening of nucleotide binding to actin is taken into consideration.     

Structural basis for the recruitment of profilin-actin complexes during filament elongation by Ena/VASP

Cells sustain high rates of actin filament elongation by maintaining a large pool of actin monomers above the critical concentration for polymerization. Profilin-actin complexes constitute the largest fraction of polymerization-competent actin monomers. Filament elongation factors such as Ena/VASP and formin catalyze the transition of profilin-actin from the cellular pool onto the barbed end of growing filaments. The molecular bases of this process are poorly understood. Here we present structural and energetic evidence for two consecutive steps of the elongation mechanism: the recruitment of profilin-actin by the last poly-Pro segment of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and the binding of profilin-actin simultaneously to this poly-Pro and to the G-actin-binding (GAB) domain of VASP. The actin monomer bound at the GAB domain is proposed to be in position to join the barbed end of the growing filament concurrently with the release of profilin.     

Analysis of the function of Spire in actin assembly and its synergy with formin and profilin

The Spire protein, together with the formin Cappuccino and profilin, plays an important role in actin-based processes that establish oocyte polarity. Spire contains a cluster of four actin-binding WH2 domains. It has been shown to nucleate actin filaments and was proposed to remain bound to their pointed ends. Here we show that the multifunctional character of the WH2 domains allows Spire to sequester four G-actin subunits binding cooperatively in a tight SA(4) complex and to nucleate, sever, and cap filaments at their barbed ends. Binding of Spire to barbed ends does not affect the thermodynamics of actin assembly at barbed ends but blocks barbed end growth from profilin-actin. The resulting Spire-induced increase in profilin-actin concentration enhances processive filament assembly by formin. The synergy between Spire and formin is reconstituted in an in vitro motility assay, which provides a functional basis for the genetic interplay between Spire, formin, and profilin in oogenesis.     

Ena/VASP proteins capture actin filament barbed ends

Ena/VASP (vasodialator-stimulated protein) proteins regulate many actin-dependent events, including formation of protrusive structures, fibroblast migration, neurite extension, cell-cell adhesion, and Listeria pathogenesis. In vitro, Ena/VASP activities on actin are complex and varied. They promote actin assembly, protect filaments from cappers, bundle filaments, and inhibit filament branching. To determine the mechanisms by which Ena/VASP proteins regulate actin dynamics at barbed ends, we monitored individual actin filaments growing in the presence of VASP and profilin using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Filament growth was unchanged by VASP, but filaments grew faster in profilin-actin and VASP than with profilin-actin alone. Actin filaments were captured directly by VASP-coated surfaces via interactions with growing barbed ends. End-attached filaments transiently paused but resumed growth after becoming bound to the surface via a filament side attachment. Thus, Ena/VASP proteins promote actin assembly by interacting directly with actin filament barbed ends, recruiting profilin-actin, and blocking capping.     

Quantitative analysis of the effect of Acanthamoeba profilin on actin filament nucleation and elongation

The current view of the mechanism of action of Acanthamoeba profilin is that it binds to actin monomers, forming a complex that cannot polymerize [Tobacman, L. S., & Korn, E. D. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 4166-4170; Tseng, P., & Pollard, T. D. (1982) J. Cell Biol. 94, 213-218; Tobacman, L. S., Brenner, S. L., & Korn, E. D. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 8806-8812]. This simple model fails to predict two new experimental observations made with Acanthamoeba actin in 50 mM KC1, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA. First, Acanthamoeba profilin inhibits elongation of actin filaments far more at the pointed end than at the barbed end. According, to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is less than 5 microM on the basis of observations at the pointed end and greater than 50 microM for the barbed end. Second, profilin inhibits nucleation more strongly than elongation. According to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is 60-140 microM on the basis of two assays of elongation but 2-10 microM on the basis of polymerization kinetics that reflect nucleation. These new findings can be explained by a new and more complex model for the mechanism of action that is related to a proposal of Tilney and co-workers [Tilney, L. G., Bonder, E. M., Coluccio, L. M., & Mooseker, M. S. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 113-124]. In this model, profilin can bind both to actin monomers with a Kd of about 5 microM and to the barbed end of actin filaments with a Kd of about 50-100 microM. An actin monomer bound to profilin cannot participate in nucleation or add to the pointed end of an actin filament. It can add to the barbed end of a filament. When profilin is bound to the barbed end of a filament, actin monomers cannot bind to that end, but the terminal actin protomer can dissociate at the usual rate. This model includes two different Kd's--one for profilin bound to actin monomers and one for profilin bound to an actin molecule at the barbed end of a filament. The affinity for the end of the filament is lower by a factor of 10 than the affinity for the monomer, presumably due to the difference in the conformation of the two forms of actin or to steric constraints at the end of the filament.     

Determinants of Formin Homology 1 (FH1) domain function in actin filament elongation by formins

Formin-mediated elongation of actin filaments proceeds via association of Formin Homology 2 (FH2) domain dimers with the barbed end of the filament, allowing subunit addition while remaining processively attached to the end. The flexible Formin Homology 1 (FH1) domain, located directly N-terminal to the FH2 domain, contains one or more stretches of polyproline that bind the actin-binding protein profilin. Diffusion of FH1 domains brings associated profilin-actin complexes into contact with the FH2-bound barbed end of the filament, thereby enabling direct transfer of actin. We investigated how the organization of the FH1 domain of budding yeast formin Bni1p determines the rates of profilin-actin transfer onto the end of the filament. Each FH1 domain transfers actin to the barbed end independently of the other and structural evidence suggests a preference for actin delivery from each FH1 domain to the closest long-pitch helix of the filament. The transfer reaction is diffusion-limited and influenced by the affinities of the FH1 polyproline tracks for profilin. Position-specific sequence variations optimize the efficiency of FH1-stimulated polymerization by binding profilin weakly near the FH2 domain and binding profilin more strongly farther away. FH1 domains of many other formins follow this organizational trend. This particular sequence architecture may optimize the efficiency of FH1-stimulated elongation.     

Hydrolysis of ATP by polymerized actin depends on the bound divalent cation but not profilin.

Growing evidence suggests that the nucleotide bound to actin filaments serves as a timer to control actin filament turnover during cell motility (Pollard, T. D., Blanchoin, L., and Mullins, R. D. (2000) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 545-576). We re-examined the hydrolysis of ATP by polymerized actin using mechanical quenched-flow methods to improve temporal resolution. The rate constant for ATP hydrolysis by polymerized Mg actin is 0.3 s(-1), 3-fold faster than that measured manually. The ATP hydrolysis rate is similar when Mg ATP actin elongates either the pointed end or the barbed end of filaments. Polymerized Ca actin hydrolyzes ATP at 0.05 s(-1). Mg ATP actin saturated with profilin can elongate barbed ends at >60 s(-1), 2 orders of magnitude faster than ATP hydrolysis (0.3 s(-1)). Given that profilin binds to a surface on actin that is buried in the Holmes model of the actin filament, we expect that profilin will block subunit addition at the barbed end of a filament. Profilin must move from this site at rates much faster than it dissociates from monomers (4 s(-1)). ATP hydrolysis is not required for this movement.     

A cross-linked profilin-actin heterodimer interferes with elongation at the fast-growing end of F-actin

Profilin and beta/gamma-actin from calf thymus were covalently linked using the zero-length cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide in combination with N-hydroxysuccinimide, yielding a single product with an apparent molecular mass of 60 kDa. Sequence analysis and x-ray crystallographic investigations showed that the cross-linked residues were glutamic acid 82 of profilin and lysine 113 of actin. The cross-linked complex was shown to bind with high affinity to deoxyribonuclease I and poly(l-proline). It also bound and exchanged ATP with kinetics close to that of unmodified profilin-actin and inhibited the intrinsic ATPase activity of actin. This inhibition occurred even in conditions where actin normally forms filaments. By these criteria the cross-linked profilin-actin complex retains the characteristics of unmodified profilin-actin. However, the cross-linked complex did not form filaments nor copolymerized with unmodified actin, but did interfere with elongation of actin filaments in a concentration-dependent manner. These results support a polymerization mechanism where the profilin-actin heterodimer binds to the (+)-end of actin filaments, followed by dissociation of profilin, and ATP hydrolysis and P(i) release from the actin subunit as it assumes its stable conformation in the helical filament.     

Role of Tropomyosin in Formin-mediated Contractile Ring Assembly in Fission Yeast

Like animal cells, fission yeast divides by assembling actin filaments into a contractile ring. In addition to formin Cdc12p and profilin, the single tropomyosin isoform SpTm is required for contractile ring assembly. Cdc12p nucleates actin filaments and remains processively associated with the elongating barbed end while driving the addition of profilin-actin. SpTm is thought to stabilize mature filaments, but it is not known how SpTm localizes to the contractile ring and whether SpTm plays a direct role in Cdc12p-mediated actin polymerization. Using “bulk” and single actin filament assays, we discovered that Cdc12p can recruit SpTm to actin filaments and that SpTm has diverse effects on Cdc12p-mediated actin assembly. On its own, SpTm inhibits actin filament elongation and depolymerization. However, Cdc12p completely overcomes the combined inhibition of actin nucleation and barbed end elongation by profilin and SpTm. Furthermore, SpTm increases the length of Cdc12p-nucleated actin filaments by enhancing the elongation rate twofold and by allowing them to anneal end to end. In contrast, SpTm ultimately turns off Cdc12p-mediated elongation by “trapping” Cdc12p within annealed filaments or by dissociating Cdc12p from the barbed end. Therefore, SpTm makes multiple contributions to contractile ring assembly during and after actin polymerization.     

Effects of macrophage profilin on actin in the presence and absence of acumentin and gelsolin

We purified profilin from rabbit alveolar macrophages and documented its structural and functional similarity to profilins isolated from other cells. The KD for formation of the macrophage profilin-actin complex was 3.0 +/- 0.8 microM (mean +/- S.D.). The affinity of this protein for actin did not change significantly in the presence of various concentrations of KCl and MgCl2, profilin-actin complex concentration being strictly dependent on the critical actin monomer concentration and free profilin concentration. We also examined profilin's interactions with actin in the presence of acumentin, a macrophage protein which inhibits actin monomer exchange at the "pointed" ends of actin filaments. Low concentrations of this protein caused substantial decreases in estimated profilin-actin complex concentration. The macrophage gelsolincalcium ion complex which blocks exchange at the "barbed" end of actin filaments, when added to profilin and actin solutions in substoichiometric concentrations, caused large increases in estimated profilin-actin complex concentration. The changes in calculated profilin-actin complex concentration induced by these two actin-modulating proteins were too large to be explained solely by their effects on critical actin monomer concentration.     

A direct-transfer polymerization model explains how the multiple profilin-binding sites in the actoclampin motor promote rapid actin-based motility

The high actin-based motility rates observed in nonmuscle cells require the per-second addition of 400-500 monomers to the barbed ends of growing actin filaments. The chief polymerization-competent species is profilin.actin.ATP (present at 5-40 microM intracellular concentrations), whereas G-actin.ATP is much less abundant ( approximately 0.1-1 microM). While earlier studies unambiguously demonstrated that profilin.actin is highly concentrated within the polymerization zone, profilin-actin localization on the motile surface cannot increase the local solution-phase concentration of polymerizable actin. To explain these high rates of actin polymerization, we present and analyze a novel polymerization model in which monomers are directly transferred to growing filament ends in the actoclampin motor. This direct-transfer polymerization mechanism endows the polymerization zone with properties unavailable to bulk-phase actin monomers, and our model also indicates why profilin is the ideal mobile carrier for actin monomers.     

Profilin-actin complexes directly elongate actin filaments at the barbed end.

We demonstrate that the profilin-G-actin complex can elongate actin filaments directly at the barbed end but cannot bind to the pointed end. During elongation, the profilin-actin complex binds to the barbed filament end, whereupon profilin is released, leaving the actin molecule behind. This was first proposed by Tilney [Tilney, L. G., et al. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 112-124] and demonstrated by Pollard and Cooper [(1984) Biochemistry 23, 6631-6641] by electron microscopy. We show that a model without any outside energy supply, in contrast to the mechanism proposed by Pollard and Cooper, can be fitted to our and their [Kaiser et al. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 102, 221-226] findings. Input of outside energy is necessary only if profilin-mediated elongation continues after free G-actin has been lowered to or below the critical concentration observed at the barbed end in the absence of profilin.     

Binding of phosphate to F-ADP-actin and role of F-ADP-Pi-actin in ATP-actin polymerization

Our previous work (Carlier, M.-F., and Pantaloni, D. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 7789-7792) had shown that F-ADP-Pi-actin is a major intermediate in ATP-actin polymerization, due to the slow rate of Pi release following ATP cleavage on filaments. To understand the mechanism of ATP-actin polymerization, we have prepared F-ADP-Pi-actin and characterized its kinetic parameters. 32Pi binds to F-ADP-actin with a stoichiometry of 1 mol/mol of F-actin subunit and an equilibrium dissociation constant Kpi of 1.5 mM at pH 7.0 Kpi increases with pH, indicating that the H2PO-4 species binds to F-actin. ADP-Pi-actin subunits dissociate much more slowly from filament ends than ADP-actin subunits; therefore, the stability of filaments in ATP is due to terminal ADP-Pi subunits. The slow rate of dissociation of ADP-Pi-actin also explains the decrease in critical concentration of ADP-actin in the presence of Pi reported by Rickard and Sheterline (Richard, J. E., and Sheterline, P. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 191, 273-280). The effect of Pi on the rate of actin dissociation from filaments is much more pronounced at the barbed end than at the pointed end. Using gelsolin to block the barbed end, we have shown that the two ends are energetically different in the presence of ATP and saturating Pi, but less different than in the absence of Pi. The results are interpreted within a new model for actin polymerization. It is possible that phosphate binding to F-actin can regulate motile events in muscle and nonmuscle cells.     

Model of formin-associated actin filament elongation

Formin FH2 domains associate processively with actin-filament barbed ends and modify their rate of growth. We modeled how the elongation rate depends on the concentrations of profilin and actin for four different formins. We assume that (1) FH2 domains are in rapid equilibrium among conformations that block or allow actin addition and that (2) profilin-actin is transferred rapidly to the barbed end from multiple profilin binding sites in formin FH1 domains. In agreement with previous experiments discussed below, we find an optimal profilin concentration with a maximal elongation rate that can exceed the rate of actin alone. High profilin concentrations suppress elongation, largely because free profilin displaces profilin-actin from FH1. The model supports a common polymerization mechanism for the four formin FH1FH2 constructs with differences attributed to varying parameter values. The mechanism does not require ATP hydrolysis by polymerized actin, but we cannot exclude that formins accelerate hydrolysis.     

High microfilament concentration results in barbed-end ADP caps.

Current theory and experiments describing actin polymerization suggest that site-specific cleavage of bound nucleotide following F-actin filament formation causes the barbed ends of microfilaments to be capped first with ATP subunits, then with ADP bound to inorganic phosphate (ADP.Pi) at steady-state. The barbed ends of depolymerizing filaments consist of ADP subunits. The decrease in stability of the barbed-end cap accompanying the transition from ADP.Pi to ADP allows nucleotide hydrolysis and subsequent loss of Pi to regulate F-actin filament dynamics. We describe a novel computational model of nucleotide capping that simulates both the spatial and temporal properties of actin polymerization. This model has been used to test the effects of high filament concentration on the behavior of the ATP hydrolysis cycle observed during polymerization. The model predicts that under conditions of high microfilament concentration an ADP cap can appear during steady-state at the barbed ends of filaments. We show that the presence of the cap can be accounted for by a kinetic model and predict the relationship between the nucleotide concentration ratio [ATP]/[ADP], the F-actin filament concentration, and the steady-state distribution of barbed-end ADP cap lengths. The possible consequences of this previously unreported phenomenon as a regulator of cytoskeletal behavior are discussed.     

The role of the FH1 domain and profilin in formin-mediated actin-filament elongation and nucleation

BACKGROUND: Formin proteins nucleate actin filaments de novo and stay associated with the growing barbed end. Whereas the formin-homology (FH) 2 domains mediate processive association, the FH1 domains-in concert with the actin-monomer-binding protein profilin-increase the rate of barbed-end elongation. The mechanism by which this effect is achieved is not well understood. RESULTS: We used total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to measure the effect of profilin on the elongation of single actin filaments associated with FH1FH2 constructs (derived from the formin Bni1p from S. cerevisiae) with FH1 domains containing one to eight profilin-binding polyproline tracks. Over a large range of profilin concentrations (0.5-25 microM), the rate of barbed-end elongation increases with the number of polyproline tracks in the FH1 domain. The binding of profilin-actin to the FH1 domain is the rate-limiting step (up to rates of at least 88 s(-1)) in FH1-mediated transfer of actin subunits to the barbed end. Dissociation of formins from barbed ends growing in the presence of profilin is proportional to the elongation rate. Profilin profoundly inhibits nucleation by FH2 and FH1FH2 constructs, but profilin-actin bound to FH1 might contribute weakly to nucleation. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve fast elongation, formin FH1 domains bind profilin-actin complexes and deliver them rapidly to the barbed end associated with the FH2 domain. Because subunit addition promotes dissociation of FH2 domains from growing barbed ends, FH2 domains must pass through a state that is prone to dissociation during each cycle of actin subunit addition coupled to formin translocation.     

Filament assembly from profilin-actin

Profilin plays a major role in the assembly of actin filament at the barbed ends. The thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for barbed end assembly from profilin-actin have been measured turbidimetrically. Filament growth from profilin-actin requires MgATP to be bound to actin. No assembly is observed from profilin-CaATP-actin. The rate constant for association of profilin-actin to barbed ends is 30% lower than that of actin, and the critical concentration for F-actin assembly from profilin-actin units is 0.3 microM under physiological ionic conditions. Barbed ends grow from profilin-actin with an ADP-Pi cap. Profilin does not cap the barbed ends and is not detectably incorporated into filaments. The EDC-cross-linked profilin-actin complex (PAcov) both copolymerizes with F-actin and undergoes spontaneous self-assembly, following a nucleation-growth process characterized by a critical concentration of 0.2 microM under physiological conditions. The PAcov polymer is a helical filament that displays the same diffraction pattern as F-actin, with layer lines at 6 and 36 nm. The PAcov filaments bound phalloidin with the same kinetics as F-actin, bound myosin subfragment-1, and supported actin-activated ATPase of myosin subfragment-1, but they did not translocate in vitro along myosin-coated glass surfaces. These results are discussed in light of the current models of actin structure.     

The cytokinesis formins from the nematode worm and fission yeast differentially mediate actin filament assembly

Formins drive actin filament assembly for diverse cellular processes including motility, establishing polarity, and cell division. To investigate the mechanism of contractile ring assembly in animal cells, we directly compared the actin assembly properties of formins required for cytokinesis in the nematode worm early embryo (CYK-1) and fission yeast (Cdc12p). Like Cdc12p and most other formins, CYK-1 nucleates actin filament assembly and remains processively associated with the elongating barbed end while facilitating the addition of profilin-actin above the theoretical diffusion-limited rate. However, specific properties differ significantly between Cdc12p and CYK-1. Cdc12p efficiently nucleates filaments that in the presence of profilin elongate at approximately the same rate as control filaments without formin (approximately 10.0 subunits/s). CYK-1 is an inefficient nucleator but allows filaments to elongate profilin-actin 6-fold faster than Cdc12p (approximately 60 subunits/s). Both Cdc12p and CYK-1 bind to pre-assembled actin filaments with low nanomolar affinity, but CYK-1 dissociates 2 orders of magnitude more quickly. However, CYK-1 rapidly re-associates with free barbed ends. Cdc12p allows barbed ends to elongate in the presence of excess capping protein, whereas capping protein inhibits CYK-1-mediated actin assembly. Therefore, these evolutionarily diverse formins can drive contractile ring assembly by a generally similar mechanism, but cells with unique dimensions and physical parameters might require proteins with carefully tuned actin assembly properties.     

A gelsolin-like protein from Papaver rhoeas pollen (PrABP80) stimulates calcium-regulated severing and depolymerization of actin filaments

The cytoskeleton is a key regulator of plant morphogenesis, sexual reproduction, and cellular responses to extracellular stimuli. During the self-incompatibility response of Papaver rhoeas L. (field poppy) pollen, the actin filament network is rapidly depolymerized by a flood of cytosolic free Ca2+ that results in cessation of tip growth and prevention of fertilization. Attempts to model this dramatic cytoskeletal response with known pollen actin-binding proteins (ABPs) revealed that the major G-actin-binding protein profilin can account for only a small percentage of the measured depolymerization. We have identified an 80-kDa, Ca(2+)-regulated ABP from poppy pollen (PrABP80) and characterized its biochemical properties in vitro. Sequence determination by mass spectrometry revealed that PrABP80 is related to gelsolin and villin. The molecular weight, lack of filament cross-linking activity, and a potent severing activity are all consistent with PrABP80 being a plant gelsolin. Kinetic analysis of actin assembly/disassembly reactions revealed that substoichiometric amounts of PrABP80 can nucleate actin polymerization from monomers, block the assembly of profilin-actin complex onto actin filament ends, and enhance profilin-mediated actin depolymerization. Fluorescence microscopy of individual actin filaments provided compelling, direct evidence for filament severing and confirmed the actin nucleation and barbed end capping properties. This is the first direct evidence for a plant gelsolin and the first example of efficient severing by a plant ABP. We propose that PrABP80 functions at the center of the self-incompatibility response by creating new filament pointed ends for disassembly and by blocking barbed ends from profilin-actin assembly.