Slow transport of the cytoskeleton after axonal injury

The delivery of cytoskeletal proteins to the axon occurs by slow axonal transport. We examined how the rate of slow transport was altered after axonal injury. When retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons regenerated through peripheral nerve grafts, an increase in the rate of slow transport occurred during regrowth of the injured axons. We compared these results to axonal injury in the optic nerve where no substantial regrowth occurs and found a completely different response. Slow transport was decreased approximately tenfold in rate in the proximal segment of crushed optic nerves. This decreased rate of slow transport was not induced immediately, but occurred about 1 week after injury. To explore whether a decrease in the rate of slow transport was induced when the regeneration of peripheral nerves was physically blocked, we examined slow transport in motor neurons after the sciatic nerve was transected and ligated. In this case, no change in the rate of the comigrating tubulin and neurofilament (NF) radioactive peaks were observed. We discuss how the changes in the rate of slow transport may reflect different neuronal responses to injury and speculate about the possible molecular changes in the expression of tubulin which may contribute to the observed changes. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Slow axonal transport.

New studies provide further evidence that the neuronal cytoskeleton is the product of a dynamic interplay between axonal transport processes and locally regulated assembly mechanisms. These data confirm that the axonal cytoskeleton in mammalian systems is largely stationary and is maintained by a smaller pool of moving subunits or polymers. Slow axonal transport in certain lower species, however, may exhibit quite different features.     

Slow axonal transport: the subunit transport model

A central problem concerning slow transport of cytoskeletal proteins along nerve axons is where they are assembled and the form in which they are transported. The polymer and subunit transport models are the two major hypotheses. Recent developments using molecular and cellular biophysics, molecular cell biology and gene technology have enabled visualization of moving forms of cytoskeletal proteins during their transport. Here, we argue that these studies support the subunit transport theory.     

Modelling organelle transport after traumatic axonal injury

This paper is motivated by recent experimental research (Tang-Schomer et al. 2012) on the formation of periodic varicosities in axons after traumatic brain injury (TBI). TBI leads to the formation of undulated distortions in the axons due to their dynamic deformation. These distortions result in the breakage of some microtubules (MTs) near the peaks of undulations. The breakage is followed by catastrophic MT depolymerisation around the broken ends. Although after relaxation axons regain their straight geometry, the structure of the axon after TBI is characterised by the presence of periodic regions where the density of MTs has been decreased due to depolymerisation. We modelled organelle transport in an axon segment with such a damaged MT structure and investigated how this structure affects the distributions of organelle concentrations and fluxes. The modelling results suggest that organelles accumulate at the boundaries of the region where the density of MTs has been decreased by depolymerisation. According to the model, the presence of such damaged regions decreases the organelle flux by only about 12%. This provides evidence that axon degradation after TBI may be caused by organelle accumulation rather than by starvation due to insufficient organelle flux.     

Slow axonal transport: fast motors in the slow lane.

The bulk of neuronally synthesized proteins destined for the axon is transported in a phase of transport approximately 100 times slower (1mm/day) than the vesicular traffic of fast axonal transport (100mm/day). Of late, a number of studies have shed considerable light on the controversies and mechanisms surrounding this slow phase of axonal transport. Along-standing controversy has centered on the form of the transported proteins. One major transport cargo, neurofilament protein, has now been seen in a number of contexts to be transported primarily in a polymeric form, whereas a second cargo tubulin is transported as a small oligomer. The development of techniques to visualize the slow transport process in live cells has demonstrated that instantaneous motions of transported neurofilaments, and presumably other slow transport cargoes, are fast, bidirectional and interspersed with long pauses. This and additional biochemical efforts indicate that traditional fast motors, such as conventional kinesin and dynein, are responsible for these fast motions.     

Slow axonal transport and the genesis of neuronal morphology

The classic view of slow axonal transport maintains that microtubules, neurofilaments, and actin filaments move down the axon relatively coherently at rates significantly slower than those characteristic of known motor proteins. Recent studies indicate that the movement of these cytoskeletal polymers is actually rapid, asynchronous, intermittent, and most probably fueled by familiar motors such as kinesins, myosins, and cytoplasmic dynein. This new view, which is supported by both live-cell imaging and mechanistic analyses, suggests that slow axonal transport is both rapid and plastic, and hence could underlie transformations in neuronal morphology.     

Slow components of axonal transport: two cytoskeletal networks

We have identified two slowly moving groups of axonally transported proteins in guinea pig retinal ganglion cell axons (4). The slowest group of proteins, designated slow component a (SCa), has a transport rate of 0.25 mm/d and consists of tubulin and neurofilament protein. The other slowly transported group of proteins, designated slow components b (SCb), has a transport rate of 2-3 mm/d and consists of many polypeptides, one of which is actin (4). Our analyses of the transport kinetics of the individual polypeptides of SCa and SCb indicate that (a) the polypeptides of SCa are transported coherently in the optic axons, (b) the polypeptides of SCb are also transported coherently but completely separately from the SCa polypeptides, and (c) the polypeptides of SCa differ completely from those comprising SCb. We relate these results to our general hypothesis that slow axonal transport represents the movements of structural complexes of proteins. Furthermore, it is proposed that SCa corresponds to the microtubule-neurofilament network, and that SCb represents the transport of the microfilament network together with the proteins complexed with microfilaments.     

Slow axonal transport: stop and go traffic in the axon

Efforts to observe the slow axonal transport of cytoskeletal polymers during the past decade have yielded conflicting results, and this has generated considerable controversy. The movement of neurofilaments has now been seen, and it is rapid, infrequent and highly asynchronous. This motile behaviour could explain why slow axonal transport has eluded observation for so long.     

Slow axonal transport mechanisms move neurofilaments relentlessly in mouse optic axons

Pulse-labeling studies of slow axonal transport in many kinds of axons (spinal motor, sensory ganglion, oculomotor, hypoglossal, and olfactory) have led to the inference that axonal transport mechanisms move neurofilaments (NFs) unidirectionally as a single continuous kinetic population with a diversity of individual transport rates. One study in mouse optic axons (Nixon, R. A., and K. B. Logvinenko. 1986. J. Cell Biol. 102:647-659) has given rise to the different suggestion that a significant and distinct population of NFs may be entirely stationary within axons. In mouse optic axons, there are relatively few NFs and the NF proteins are more lightly labeled than other slowly transported slow component b (SCb) proteins (which, however, move faster than the NFs); thus, in mouse optic axons, the radiolabel of some of these faster-moving SCb proteins may confuse NF protein analyses that use one dimensional (1-D) SDS-PAGE, which separates proteins by size only. To test this possibility, we used a 2-mm "window" (at 3-5 mm from the posterior of the eye) to compare NF kinetics obtained by 1-D SDS-PAGE and by the higher resolution two-dimensional (2-D) isoelectric focusing/SDS-PAGE, which separates proteins both by their net charge and by their size. We found that 1-D SDS-PAGE is insufficient for definitive NF kinetics in the mouse optic system. By contrast, 2-D SDS-PAGE provides essentially pure NF kinetics, and these indicate that in the NF-poor mouse optic axons, most NFs advance as they do in other, NF-rich axons. In mice, greater than 97% of the radiolabeled NFs were distributed in a unimodal wave that moved at a continuum of rates, between 3.0 and 0.3 mm/d, and less than 0.1% of the NF population traveled at the very slowest rates of less than 0.005 mm/d. These results are inconsistent with the proposal (Nixon and Logvinenko, 1986) that 32% of the transported NFs remain within optic axons in an entirely stationary state. As has been found in other axons, the axonal transport system of mouse optic axons moves NFs and other cytoskeletal elements relentlessly from the cell body to the axon tip.     

Dynamics of fast axonal transport.

A phenomenological model of the process of fast axoplasmic transport is presented. The process was conceived of as occurring in two parts: (a) synthesis and storage of material in a cytoplasmic pool; (b) release from the pool and transport distally along the axon. Considering the fate of labeled proteins, the activity at points along the axon relfects events occurring earlier within the pool through the relationship: g(x,t) = const f(t - x/v); where g(x,t) represents axonal activity, f(t) the pool's activity, and v is the transport speed. Using the idea that when there is no further input of radioactivity into the pool its activity declines exponentially due to export of material to the axon. I generalized this concept to the case where activity enters and leaves the pool simultaneously. The model contains two parameters: the relative turnover rate of the pool, alpha, and T, an interval characteristic of the time of synthesis. From this model, the experimental data is unfolded and yields values for these parameters of alpha = 0.004 min-1 and T approximately 60 min.     

The genetics of axonal transport and axonal transport disorders

Neurons are specialized cells with a complex architecture that includes elaborate dendritic branches and a long, narrow axon that extends from the cell body to the synaptic terminal. The organized transport of essential biological materials throughout the neuron is required to support its growth, function, and viability. In this review, we focus on insights that have emerged from the genetic analysis of long-distance axonal transport between the cell body and the synaptic terminal. We also discuss recent genetic evidence that supports the hypothesis that disruptions in axonal transport may cause or dramatically contribute to neurodegenerative diseases.     

Axonal cytoskeletal changes after non-disruptive axonal injury

In animal models of human diffuse axonal injury, axonal swellings leading to secondary axotomy occur between 2 and 6 h after injury. But, analysis of cytoskeletal changes associated with secondary axotomy has not been undertaken. We have carried out a quantitative analysis of cytoskeletal changes in a model of diffuse axonal injury 4 h after stretch-injury to adult guinea-pig optic nerves. The major site of axonal damage was the middle portion of the nerve. There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of small axons with a diameter of 0.5 μm and smaller in which there was compaction of neurofilaments. Axons with a diameter greater than 2.0 μm demonstrated an increased spacing between cytoskeletal elements throughout the length of the nerve. However, in the middle segment of the nerve these larger axons demonstrated two different types of response. Either, where periaxonal spaces occurred, there was a reduction in axonal calibre, compaction of neurofilaments but no change in their number, and a loss of microtubules. Or, where intramyelinic spaces occurred there was an increased spacing between neurofilaments and microtubules with a significant loss in the number of both. Longitudinal sections showed foci of compaction of neurofilaments interspersed between regions where axonal structure was apparently normal. Neurofilament compaction was correlated with disruption of the axolemma at these foci present some hours after injury. We suggest that the time course of these axonal cytoskeletal changes after stretch-injury to central axons is shorter than those changes documented to occur during Wallerian degeneration.     

Motors for fast axonal transport.

In neurons and other animal cells, membrane-bound vesicles course rapidly along cytoskeletal filaments to reach their destinations. Based on a variety of in vivo studies it is becoming clear that the microtubule-based motor, kinesin (and its relatives), drive vesicle movements in axons. Surprisingly, some axonal membranes have the capacity to move on both microtubules and actin filaments.     

Integrins promote axonal regeneration after injury of the nervous system

Integrins are cell surface receptors that form the link between extracellular matrix molecules of the cell environment and internal cell signalling and the cytoskeleton. They are involved in several processes, e.g. adhesion and migration during development and repair. This review focuses on the role of integrins in axonal regeneration. Integrins participate in spontaneous axonal regeneration in the peripheral nervous system through binding to various ligands that either inhibit or enhance their activation and signalling. Integrin biology is more complex in the central nervous system. Integrins receptors are transported into growing axons during development, but selective polarised transport of integrins limits the regenerative response in adult neurons. Manipulation of integrins and related molecules to control their activation state and localisation within axons is a promising route towards stimulating effective regeneration in the central nervous system.