Epigenetic Priming of AML Blasts for All-trans Retinoic Acid-Induced Differentiation by the HDAC Class-I Selective Inhibitor Entinostat

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) has only limited single agent activity in AML without the PML-RARα fusion (non-M3 AML). In search of a sensitizing strategy to overcome this relative ATRA resistance, we investigated the potency of the HDAC class-I selective inhibitor entinostat in AML cell lines Kasumi-1 and HL-60 and primary AML blasts. Entinostat alone induced robust differentiation of both cell lines, which was enhanced by the combination with ATRA. This “priming” effect on ATRA-induced differentiation was at least equivalent to that achieved with the DNA hypomethylating agent decitabine, and could overall be recapitulated in primary AML blasts treated ex vivo. Moreover, entinostat treatment established the activating chromatin marks acH3, acH3K9, acH4 and H3K4me3 at the promoter of the RARβ2 gene, an essential mediator of retinoic acid (RA) signaling in different solid tumor models. Similarly, RARβ2 promoter hypermethylation (which in primary blasts from 90 AML/MDS patients was surprisingly infrequent) could be partially reversed by decitabine in the two cell lines. Re-induction of the epigenetically silenced RARβ2 gene was achieved only when entinostat or decitabine were given prior to ATRA treatment. Thus in this model, reactivation of RARβ2 was not necessarily required for the differentiation effect, and pharmacological RARβ2 promoter demethylation may be a bystander phenomenon rather than an essential prerequisite for the cellular effects of decitabine when combined with ATRA. In conclusion, as a “priming” agent for non-M3 AML blasts to the differentiation-inducing effects of ATRA, entinostat is at least as active as decitabine, and both act in part independently from RARβ2. Further investigation of this treatment combination in non-M3 AML patients is therefore warranted, independently of RARβ2 gene silencing by DNA methylation.     

罗米地辛与阿糖胞苷联合用药在肺腺癌细胞中介导组蛋白H3K14乙酰化提高CASP3转录活性

肺癌发病率和病死率均居全球恶性肿瘤首位,有效的药物是治疗肺癌的关键。罗米地辛和阿糖胞苷是已经批准上市并应用于临床治疗的癌症化疗药物。这两种药物的联合用药是否在肺腺癌的治疗中发挥作用及其相关分子机制尚不明确。本研究通过MTT和克隆形成实验证实,罗米地辛和阿糖胞苷联合用药可以显著抑制肺腺癌细胞A549的生长(P<0.05)。体外Transwell细胞侵袭实验和划痕实验表明,联合用药可有效降低肺腺癌细胞的侵袭和转移能力(P<0.05)。同时,流式细胞分析显示,联合用药可以显著诱导肺腺癌细胞的凋亡(P<0.05),并且实时PCR和Western印迹结果提示,肺腺癌细胞A549在联合用药处理后,凋亡相关蛋白质CASP3的mRNA和蛋白质表达水平均明显升高。另外,通过检测联合用药后,A549细胞的组蛋白乙酰化修饰情况发现,H3K14位点乙酰化水平被明显上调,并且ChIP分析进一步显示,CASP3启动子区域组蛋白H3K14乙酰化水平在联合用药后明显增加(P<0.05)。本研究揭示了罗米地辛与阿糖胞苷联合用药能通过增强CASP3启动子区组蛋白H3K14乙酰化水平进而促进CASP3的转录和蛋白质表达,从而抑制肺腺癌细胞的生长、增殖、迁移和侵袭,促进其凋亡的分子机制。在分子和细胞水平上为罗米地辛和阿糖胞苷联合用药治疗肺腺癌提供依据,并为肺腺癌的临床治疗提供切实参考。     

Biologic Activity of a Nucleotide Conjugate Between Mitomycin C and Cytarabine Monophosphate

Abstract

A dual prodrug conjugate between the antimetabolite cytarabine monophosphate and the alkylating agent 2,7-diaminomitosene (derived from mitomycin C), cytaramycin, was synthesized and tested for antileukemic activity in sensitive and resistant tumors. The compound was active against parental L-1210, CCRF-CEM, HL-60 and K-562 leukemia cells but did not overcome resistance in sublines developed for (1) multidrug resistance (L-1210/MDR and K-562-R) or (2) for cytarabine resistance (CCRF-CEM/ARA-C and HL-60/ARA-C). Alkaline DNA elution tests demonstrate a predominance of strand breaking activity due to the cytarabine moiety, and a lesser degree of DNA crosslinking, due to the mitosene moiety. The conjugate was active in mice bearing P-388 leukemia (80% increased lifespan), but was not more effective than mitomycin C alone in mice bearing a cytarabine-resistant L-1210 cell line (38% to 31% increased lifespan). These findings suggest that mitomycin nucleotide conjugates do not overcome resistance to the parent antimetabolites.     

SAMHD1 protects cancer cells from various nucleoside-based antimetabolites

Recently, we demonstrated that sterile α motif and HD domain containing protein 1 (SAMHD1) is a major barrier in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) cells to the cytotoxicity of cytarabine (ara-C), the most important drug in AML treatment. Ara-C is intracellularly converted by the canonical dNTP synthesis pathway to ara-CTP, which serves as a substrate but not an allosteric activator of SAMHD1. Using an AML mouse model, we show here that wild type but not catalytically inactive SAMHD1 reduces ara-C treatment efficacy in vivo. Expanding the clinically relevant substrates of SAMHD1, we demonstrate that THP-1 CRISPR/Cas9 cells lacking a functional SAMHD1 gene showed increased sensitivity to the antimetabolites nelarabine, fludarabine, decitabine, vidarabine, clofarabine, and trifluridine. Within this Extra View, we discuss and build upon both these and our previously reported findings, and propose SAMHD1 is likely active against a variety of nucleoside analog antimetabolites present in anti-cancer chemotherapies. Thus, SAMHD1 may constitute a promising target to improve a wide range of therapies for both hematological and non-haematological malignancies.     

Modulation by decitabine of gene expression and growth of osteosarcoma U2OS cells <Emphasis Type="Italic">in vitro</Emphasis> and in xenografts: Identification of apoptotic genes as targets for demethylation

Background  

Methylation-mediated silencing of genes is one epigenetic mechanism implicated in cancer. Studies regarding the role of modulation of gene expression utilizing inhibitors of DNA methylation, such as decitabine, in osteosarcoma (OS) have been limited. A biological understanding of the overall effects of decitabine in OS is important because this particular agent is currently undergoing clinical trials. The objective of this study was to measure the response of the OS cell line, U2OS, to decitabine treatment both in vitro and in vivo.     

The Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax inhibits Nrf2 antioxidant pathway activation induced by hypomethylating agents in AML

Induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), an important process for the cytotoxicity of various acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapies including hypomethylating agents (HMAs), concurrently activates the NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) antioxidant response pathway which in turn results in induction of antioxidant enzymes that neutralize ROS. In this study, we demonstrated that Nrf2 inhibition is an additional mechanism responsible for the marked antileukemic activity in AML seen with the combination of HMAs and venetoclax (ABT-199). HMA and venetoclax combined treatment augmented mitochondrial ROS induction and apoptosis compared with treatment HMA alone. Treatment of AML cell lines as well as primary AML cells with venetoclax disrupted HMA decitabine-increased nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and induction of downstream antioxidant enzymes including heme oxygenase-1 and NADP-quinone oxidoreductase-1. Venetoclax treatment also leads to dissociation of B-cell lymphoma 2 from the Nrf2/Keap-1 complex and targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Thus, our results here demonstrated an undiscovered mechanism underlying synergistic effect of decitabine and venetoclax in AML cells, elucidating for impressive results in antileukemic activity against AML in preclinical and early clinical studies by combined treatment of these drugs.     

High-Dose Cytarabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The optimal dose, scheme, and clinical setting for Ara-C in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment remain uncertain. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to systematically assess the impact of high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) on AML therapy during the induction and consolidation stages. Twenty-two trials with a total of 5,945 de novo AML patients were included in the meta-analysis. Only patients less than 60 year-old were included in the study. Using HDAC in induction therapy was beneficial for RFS (HR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35–0.93; P = 0.02) but not so for CR rate (HR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93–1.09; P = 0.88) and OS (HR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66–1.03; P = 0.1). In consolidation therapy, HDAC showed significant RFS benefits (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49–0.9; P = 0.008) especially for the favorable-risk group (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21–0.69; P = 0.001) compared with SDAC (standard dose cytarabine), although no OS advantage was observed (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.55–1.27; P = 0.41). HDAC treatment seemed less effective than auto-BMT/allo-BMT treatment (HR = 1.66, 95% CI, 1.3–2.14; P<0.0001) with similar OS. HDAC treatment led to lower relapse rate in induction and consolidation therapy than SDAC treatment, especially for the favorable-risk group. Auto-BMT/allo-BMT was more beneficial in prolonging RFS than HDAC.     

The depletion of DNA methyltransferase-1 and the epigenetic effects of 5-aza-2’deoxycytidine (decitabine) are differentially regulated by cell cycle progression

5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) is a drug targeting the epigenetic abnormalities of tumors. The basis for its limited efficacy in solid tumors is unresolved, but may relate to their indolent growth, their p53 genotype or both. We report that the primary molecular mechanism of decitabine—depletion of DNA methyltransferase-1 following its “suicide” inactivation—is not absolutely associated with cell cycle progression in HCT 116 colon cancer cells, but is associated with their p53 genotype. Control experiments affirmed that the secondary molecular effects of decitabine on global and promoter-specific CpG methylation and MAGE-A1 mRNA expression were S-phase dependent, as expected. Secondary changes in CpG methylation occurred only in growing cells ~24–48 h after decitabine treatment; these epigenetic changes coincided with p53 accumulation, an index of DNA damage. Conversely, primary depletion of DNA methyltransferase-1 began immediately after a single exposure to 300 nM decitabine and it progressed to completion within ~8 h, even in confluent cells arrested in G₁ and G₂/M. Our results suggest that DNA repair and remodeling activity in arrested, confluent cells may be sufficient to support the primary molecular action of decitabine, while its secondary, epigenetic effects require cell cycle progression through S-phase.     

Immunocytochemical Detection of Deoxycytidine Kinase in Pediatric Malignancies in Relation to In Vitro Cytarabine Sensitivity

Deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) is essential for the phosphorylation of cytarabine (ara‐C), a deoxycytidine analog active against acute leukemias. Resistance to ara‐C has been linked to dCK deficiency. In this study we determined the expression of the dCK protein in pediatric malignancies, using immunocytochemistry and related the expression levels to in vitro ara‐C sensitivity (measured with the MTT‐assay). dCK expression was high in the AML and retinoblastoma samples, in the ALL samples dCK expression ranged from low to very high. The brain tumor samples expressed low levels of dCK. AML was significantly more sensitive in vitro to ara‐C compared to ALL (p = 0.03). Retinoblastoma and brain tumor cells were extremely resistant in vitro, we were unable to detect more than 50% ara‐C induced cell kill in the majority of samples. Samples were combined in groups according to dCK expression. Samples with low dCK expression were significantly more resistant to ara‐C compared to samples with high dCK expression. In conclusion, dCK expression varies between individual samples and between different types of malignancies and may play a role in resistance to ara‐C in particular tumor types.     

Artesunate improves venetoclax plus cytarabine AML cell targeting by regulating the Noxa/Bim/Mcl-1/p-Chk1 axis

Venetoclax plus cytarabine therapy is approved for elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and needs further improvement. We studied the mechanisms of venetoclax plus cytarabine treatment and searched for a third agent to enhance their effects. Cytarabine induces S phase arrest-mediated DNA damage with activation of DNA replication checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) through phosphorylation, while venetoclax induces B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2)-interacting mediator of cell death (Bim)-mediated apoptotic DNA damage. Myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl-1) plays negative roles in both events by sequestering Bim and accelerating Chk1 phosphorylation. Venetoclax releases Bim from Bcl-2 with increased Bim binding to Mcl-1. Artesunate, an antimalaria drug, induces Noxa to replace Bim from Mcl-1 and induces synergistic apoptosis with venetoclax accompanied with Mcl-1 reduction. Silencing Mcl-1 or adding venetoclax/artesunate diminishes the cytarabine resistance pathway p-Chk1. The triple combination exhibits S phase arrest with enhanced DNA damage, improves AML colony formation inhibition, and prolongs survival of two mice xenograft models compared to the venetoclax/cytarabine dual combination. Artesunate serves as a bridge for venetoclax and cytarabine combination by Noxa and Bim-mediated apoptosis and Mcl-1 reduction. We provide a new triple combination for AML treatment by targeting the Noxa/Mcl-1/Bim axis to reverse Mcl-1/p-Chk1 resistance of cytarabine therapy.Subject terms: Acute myeloid leukaemia, Pharmacodynamics     

地西他滨联合小剂量HAG方案对急性髓系白血病患者细胞免疫功能及血清COX-2、bFGF的影响

目的:探讨地西他滨联合小剂量高三尖杉酯碱⁺阿糖胞苷⁺重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(HAG)方案对急性髓系白血病(AML)患者细胞免疫功能及血清环氧合酶-2(COX-2)、碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)的影响。方法:选取2016年4月~2019年4月期间山西白求恩医院收治的AML患者93例,根据随机数字表法分为对照组(n=46,HAG方案)和研究组(n=47,地西他滨联合小剂量HAG方案),比较两组患者临床疗效、细胞免疫功能、血清COX-2、bFGF水平的变化情况,记录两组治疗期间不良反应情况。结果:研究组治疗后的临床总有效率为80.85%(38/47),高于对照组的56.52%(26/46)(P<0.05)。两组治疗后CD3⁺、CD4⁺/CD8⁺、CD4⁺水平均下降,但研究组高于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者CD8⁺水平均升高,且研究组高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗后血清COX-2、bFGF水平均下降,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较无差异(P>0.05)。结论:地西他滨联合小剂量HAG方案治疗可减轻AML患者机体免疫抑制,改善血清COX-2、bFGF水平,且用药安全性较好。     

Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials Comparing Idarubicin + Cytarabine with Daunorubicin + Cytarabine as the Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukaemia

Background

To determine whether the use of idarubicin+cytarabine (IA) is more effective than the use of daunorubicin+cytarabine (DA) as induction chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia.

Methods

A computer-based search was performed. Randomised trials comparing IA with DA as induction therapy for newly diagnosed AML were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcome of interest for our analysis was survival (disease-free survival, event-free survival and overall survival); the secondary endpoint was complete remission.

Results

Ten trials with 4,060 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Our pooled results suggest that IA is associated with a significant advantage in CR (RR = 1·23; 95% CI = 1·07–1·41, p = 0.004), EFS (HR = 0·64; 95% CI = 0·45–0·91, p = 0.013), and OS (HR = 0·88; 95% CI = 0·81–0·95, p = 0.02) but not in DFS (HR = 0·90; 95% CI = 0·80–1·00, p = 0.06). In the subgroup analysis, age had a significant interaction with OS and CR benefits.

Conclusion

Our analysis indicated that IA could improve the duration of overall survival compared to DA as induction therapy for young patients with newly diagnosed AML. Further study is needed to determine whether IA can produce clinical benefits in selected genetic or molecular subgroups of young AML patients.     

Increased PRAME-Specific CTL Killing of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells by Either a Novel Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Chidamide Alone or Combined Treatment with Decitabine

As one of the best known cancer testis antigens, PRAME is overexpressed exclusively in germ line tissues such as the testis as well as in a variety of solid and hematological malignant cells including acute myeloid leukemia. Therefore, PRAME has been recognized as a promising target for both active and adoptive anti-leukemia immunotherapy. However, in most patients with PRAME-expressing acute myeloid leukemia, PRAME antigen-specific CD8⁺ CTL response are either undetectable or too weak to exert immune surveillance presumably due to the inadequate PRAME antigen expression and PRAME-specific antigen presentation by leukemia cells. In this study, we observed remarkably increased PRAME mRNA expression in human acute myeloid leukemia cell lines and primary acute myeloid leukemia cells after treatment with a novel subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor chidamide in vitro. PRAME expression was further enhanced in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines after combined treatment with chidamide and DNA demethylating agent decitabine. Pre-treatment of an HLA-A0201⁺ acute myeloid leukemia cell line THP-1 with chidamide and/or decitabine increased sensitivity to purified CTLs that recognize PRAME^100–108 or PRAME^300–309 peptide presented by HLA-A0201. Chidamide-induced epigenetic upregulation of CD86 also contributed to increased cytotoxicity of PRAME antigen-specific CTLs. Our data thus provide a new line of evidence that epigenetic upregulation of cancer testis antigens by a subtype-selective HDAC inhibitor or in combination with hypomethylating agent increases CTL cytotoxicity and may represent a new opportunity in future design of treatment strategy targeting specifically PRAME-expressing acute myeloid leukemia.     

Direct but No Transgenerational Effects of Decitabine and Vorinostat on Male Fertility

Establishment and maintenance of the correct epigenetic code is essential for a plethora of physiological pathways and disturbed epigenetic patterns can provoke severe consequences, e.g. tumour formation. In recent years, epigenetic drugs altering the epigenome of tumours actively have been developed for anti-cancer therapies. However, such drugs could potentially also affect other physiological pathways and systems in which intact epigenetic patterns are essential. Amongst those, male fertility is one of the most prominent. Consequently, we addressed possible direct effects of two epigenetic drugs, decitabine and vorinostat, on both, the male germ line and fertility. In addition, we checked for putative transgenerational epigenetic effects on the germ line of subsequent generations (F1–F3). Parental adult male C57Bl/6 mice were treated with either decitabine or vorinostat and analysed as well as three subsequent untreated generations derived from these males. Treatment directly affected several reproductive parameters as testis (decitabine & vorinostat) and epididymis weight, size of accessory sex glands (vorinostat), the height of the seminiferous epithelium and sperm concentration and morphology (decitabine). Furthermore, after decitabine administration, DNA methylation of a number of loci was altered in sperm. However, when analysing fertility of treated mice (fertilisation, litter size and sex ratio), no major effect of the selected epigenetic drugs on male fertility was detected. In subsequent generations (F1–F3 generations) only subtle changes on reproductive organs, sperm parameters and DNA methylation but no overall effect on fertility was observed. Consequently, in mice, decitabine and vorinostat neither affected male fertility per se nor caused marked transgenerational effects. We therefore suggest that both drugs do not induce major adverse effects—in terms of male fertility and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance—when used in anti-cancer-therapies.     

The depletion of DNA methyltransferase-1 and the epigenetic effects of 5-aza-2′deoxycytidine (decitabine) are differentially regulated by cell cycle progression

5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine) is a drug targeting the epigenetic abnormalities of tumors. The basis for its limited efficacy in solid tumors is unresolved, but may relate to their indolent growth, their p53 genotype or both. We report that the primary molecular mechanism of decitabine—depletion of DNA methyltransferase-1 following its “suicide” inactivation—is not absolutely associated with cell cycle progression in HCT 116 colon cancer cells, but is associated with their p53 genotype. Control experiments affirmed that the secondary molecular effects of decitabine on global and promoter-specific CpG methylation and MAGE-A1 mRNA expression were S-phase dependent, as expected. Secondary changes in CpG methylation occurred only in growing cells ∼24–48 h after decitabine treatment; these epigenetic changes coincided with p53 accumulation, an index of DNA damage. Conversely, primary depletion of DNA methyltransferase-1 began immediately after a single exposure to 300 nM decitabine and it progressed to completion within ∼8 h, even in confluent cells arrested in G₁ and G₂/M. Our results suggest that DNA repair and remodeling activity in arrested, confluent cells may be sufficient to support the primary molecular action of decitabine, while its secondary, epigenetic effects require cell cycle progression through S-phase.Key words: 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, decitabine, DNA methyltransferase-1, suicide inactivation, p53, S-phase, cell cycle     

Oncogenic NRAS Primes Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells for Differentiation

RAS mutations are frequently found among acute myeloid leukemia patients (AML), generating a constitutively active signaling protein changing cellular proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. We have previously shown that treatment of AML patients with high-dose cytarabine is preferentially beneficial for those harboring oncogenic RAS. On the basis of a murine AML cell culture model, we ascribed this effect to a RAS-driven, p53-dependent induction of differentiation. Hence, in this study we sought to confirm the correlation between RAS status and differentiation of primary blasts obtained from AML patients. The gene expression signature of AML blasts with oncogenic NRAS indeed corresponded to a more mature profile compared to blasts with wildtype RAS, as demonstrated by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and real-time PCR analysis of myeloid ecotropic viral integration site 1 homolog (MEIS1) in a unique cohort of AML patients. In addition, in vitro cell culture experiments with established cell lines and a second set of primary AML cells showed that oncogenic NRAS mutations predisposed cells to cytarabine (AraC) driven differentiation. Taken together, our findings show that AML with inv(16) and NRAS mutation have a differentiation gene signature, supporting the notion that NRAS mutation may predispose leukemic cells to AraC induced differentiation. We therefore suggest that promotion of differentiation pathways by specific genetic alterations could explain the superior treatment outcome after therapy in some AML patient subgroups. Whether a differentiation gene expression status may generally predict for a superior treatment outcome in AML needs to be addressed in future studies.