Induction of chromosome malsegregation by nanomaterials

NMs (nanomaterials), defined as materials with at least one dimension smaller than 100?nm, are able to induce genotoxic effects. One of the hypotheses of the mode-of-action in which they exert their genotoxic potential is to mechanically interfere with subcellular structures, in particular the microtubules. In the present paper, we review studies exploring interactions between NMs and tubulin; therefore a PubMed literature search was performed. From this search 12 studies, applying both acellular and cellular assays, were retrieved and are summarized according to endpoint and particle type. These studies show that there are interactions between different types of NMs and tubulins in both acellular and cellular systems. For several types of NMs, the multi-walled carbon nanotubes, amorphous SiO(2), TiO(2) and CoCr, an induction of aneuploidy was observed in vitro. There is, therefore, a critical need to assess the capacity of NMs to interfere with the cytoskeleton, and in particular the tubulins. This might require definition of relevant dosimetry, adaptations of some testing protocols, possibly development of new methodologies and studies on a larger size-range of NMs.     

Threshold effects in genetic toxicity: perspective of chemicals regulation in Germany

In the regulation of chemical substances, it is generally agreed that there are no thresholds for genotoxic effects of chemicals, i.e. , that there are no doses without genotoxic effects. When classifying and labelling chemicals, dangerous properties of chemicals are to be identified. In this context, in general, the mode of action (threshold or not) is not considered for genotoxic substances. In the process of quantitative risk assessment, however, determination of the type of dose-effect relationships is decisive for the outcome and the type of risk management. The presence of a threshold must be justified specifically in each individual case. Inter alia, the following aspects may be discussed in this respect: aneugenic activity, indirect modes of action, extremely steep dose-effect relationships in combination with strong toxicity, specific toxicokinetic conditions which may lead to 'metabolic protection' prior to an attack of DNA. In the practice of the regulation of chemical substances with respect to their genotoxic effects, the discussion of thresholds has played a minor role. For notified new substances, there are, in general, no data available that would allow a reasonable discussion. Concerning substances out of the European programme on existing substances, so far 29 have been assessed in our institute with respect to genetic toxicity. Eight out of these have shown considerable evidence for genotoxicity. For two of them, a possible threshold is discussed: one substance is an aneugen, the other one is metabolised to an endogenic compound with genotoxic potential. In the practice of risk assessment of genotoxic substances, the discussion of the mode of action for genotoxicity is frequently associated with the evaluation of potential carcinogenic effects. Here, tissue-specific genotoxic effects in target organs for carcinogenicity are to be discussed. Moreover, the contribution of genotoxicity to the multifactorial process of tumour development should be assessed.     

Genotoxicity of heat-processed foods

Gene-environment interactions include exposure to genotoxic compounds from our diet and it is no doubt, that humans are regularly exposed to e.g. food toxicants, not least from cooked foods. This paper reviews briefly four classes of cooked food toxicants, e.g. acrylamide, heterocyclic amines, nitrosamines and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Many of these compounds have been recognised for decades also as environmental pollutants. In addition cigarette smokers and some occupational workers are exposed to them. Their occurrence, formation, metabolic activation, genotoxicity and human cancer risk are briefly presented along with figures on estimated exposure. Several lines of evidence indicate that cooking conditions and dietary habits can contribute to human cancer risk through the ingestion of genotoxic compounds from heat-processed foods. Such compounds cause different types of DNA damage: nucleotide alterations and gross chromosomal aberrations. Most genotoxic compounds begin their action at the DNA level by forming carcinogen-DNA adducts, which result from the covalent binding of a carcinogen or part of a carcinogen to a nucleotide. The genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of these cooked food toxicants have been evaluated regularly by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which has come to the conclusion that several of these food-borne toxicants present in cooked foods are possibly (2A) or probably (2B) carcinogenic to humans, based on both high-dose, long-term animal studies and in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests. Yet, there is insufficient scientific evidence that these genotoxic compounds really cause human cancer, and no limits have been set for their presence in cooked foods. However, the competent authorities in most Western countries recommend minimising their occurrence, therefore this aspect is also included in this review.     

Herbivore-induced indirect interaction webs on terrestrial plants: the importance of non-trophic, indirect, and facilitative interactions

One of the most important issues in ecology is understanding the causal mechanisms that shape the structure of ecological communities through trophic interactions. The focus on direct, trophic interactions in much of the research to date means that the potential significance of non-trophic, indirect, and facilitative interactions has been largely ignored in traditional food webs. There is a growing appreciation of the community consequences of such non-trophic effects, and the need to start including them in food web research. This review highlights how non-trophic, indirect, and facilitative interactions play an important role in organizing the structure of plant-centered arthropod communities. I argue that herbivore-induced plant responses, insect ecosystem engineers, and mutualisms involving ant–honeydew-producing insects all generate interaction linkages among insect herbivores, thereby producing complex indirect interaction webs on terrestrial plants. These interactions are all very common and widespread on terrestrial plants, in fact they are almost ubiquitous, but these interactions have rarely been included in traditional food webs. Finally, I will emphasize that because the important community consequences of these non-trophic and indirect interactions have been largely unexplored, it is critical that indirect interaction webs should be the focus of future research.     

Spectrum of styrene-induced DNA adducts: the relationship to other biomarkers and prospects in human biomonitoring

Styrene is an important industrial chemical that has shown genotoxicity in many toxicology assays. This is believed to be related to the DNA-binding properties of styrene-7,8-oxide (SO), a major metabolite of styrene. In this review, we have summarized knowledge on various aspects of styrene genotoxicity, especially in order to understand the formation and removal of primary DNA lesions, and the usefulness of biomarkers for risk assessment. Biological significances of specific DNA adducts and their role in the cascade of genotoxic events are discussed. Links between markers of external and internal exposure are evaluated, as well as metabolic aspects leading to the formation of DNA adducts and influencing biomarkers of biological effect. Finally, we suggest a design of a population study, which may contribute to our understanding genotoxic events in the exposure either to single xenobiotic or complex mixture.     

Genotoxicity testing of biotechnology-derived products. Report of a GUM task force. Gesellschaft für Umweltmutationsforschung

Various aspects of genotoxicity testing of biotechnology-derived products are discussed based on information gathered from a questionnaire which was sent to about 30 predominantly European companies. Feedback was received from 13 companies on 78 compounds, mostly recombinant proteins but also on a number of nonrecombinant proteins, which had been assessed for genotoxicity in a total of 177 tests. Four of the 78 compounds appeared to elicit reproducible genotoxic effects. For one of these compounds, the activity could be related to a nonpeptidic linker molecule. No scientifically convincing rationale for the other three compounds could be established, although, at least for two compounds, their activity may be connected with the enzymatic/hormonal activity. In addition to the survey, published reports on genotoxicity testing of biotechnology products were reviewed. The data are discussed relative to whether genotoxicity testing is a valuable exercise when assessing potentially toxic liabilities of biotechnology-derived compounds. It is concluded that genotoxicity testing is generally inappropriate and unnecessary, a position which is in accordance with the available guidelines addressing this area. For the 'average' protein, electrophilic reactions are difficult to envision. Indirect reactions via DNA metabolism and growth regulation seem possible for only very specific proteins such as nucleases, growth factors, cytokines. No information on testing of different types of biotechnology-derived products (e.g., ribozymes, antisense-oligonucleotides, DNA vaccines) has been received in the questionnaires. Discussion of their potential to cause genotoxic changes was based on literature reports. Even for those products for which concerns of genotoxic/tumourigenic potential cannot be completely ruled out, e.g., because of their interaction with DNA metabolism or proliferation control, the performance of standard genotoxicity assays generally appears to be of little value. All information, including also information on the occurrence of genotoxic impurities, has been utilized to formulate a decision tree approach for the genotoxicity testing of biotechnology-derived products.     

A review of the genotoxicity of ethylbenzene

Ethylbenzene is an important industrial chemical that has recently been classified as a possible human carcinogen (IARC class 2B). It induces tumours in rats and mice, but neither the relevance of these tumours to humans nor their mechanism of induction is clear. Considering the carcinogenic potential of ethylbenzene, it is of interest to determine whether there is sufficient data to characterize its mode of action as either genotoxic or non-genotoxic. A review of the currently available genotoxicity data is assessed. Ethylbenzene is not a bacterial mutagen, does not induce gene conversion or mutations in yeast and does not induce sister chromatid exchanges in CHO cells. Ethylbenzene is not clastogenic in CHO or rat liver cell lines but was reported to induce micronuclei in SHE cells in vitro. No evidence for genotoxicity has been seen in humans exposed to relatively high levels of ethylbenzene. Mouse lymphoma gene mutation studies produced a mixed series of responses that have proved difficult to interpret. An increase in morphological transformation of SHE cells was also found. Results from a more relevant series of in vivo genotoxicity studies, including acute and sub-chronic micronucleus tests and the mouse liver UDS assay, indicate a lack of in vivo genotoxic activity. The composite set of results from both in vitro and in vivo tests known to assess direct damage to DNA have been predominantly negative in the absence of excessive toxicity. The available data from the standard battery of genotoxicity assays do not support a genotoxic mechanism for ethylbenzene-induced kidney, liver or lung tumors in rats and mice.     

Human biological relevance and the use of threshold-arguments in regulatory genotoxicity assessment: experience with pharmaceuticals

Issues of biological relevance and thresholds for genotoxicity are discussed here based upon the background of experience with the submissions for the approval of new pharmaceuticals to the German regulatory authority over the period between 1990 and 1997. This experience shows that out of the genotoxicity test systems which are required according to existing guidelines in the European Union (EU), the in vitro tests for chromosomal aberrations (CA) and the mouse lymphoma tk assays (MLA) yield a rate of positives that is about four-fold higher than that of other genotoxicity tests. A detailed analysis of chemical and pharmacological classes of compounds and their effects in these systems reveals that in addition to direct DNA reactivity several mechanisms of indirect genotoxicity such as nucleoside analogue incorporation into DNA, interaction with microtubule assembly, topoisomerase inhibition and high levels of cytotoxicity are relevant. New pharmaceuticals, for which the latter mechanisms apply, often display threshold-like characteristics in their genotoxic effects in vitro or even in vivo in experimental animals. This casts doubt upon the relevance of positive in vitro test results for such compounds. However, the discussion of examples shows that it may not be easy to demonstrate the exact thresholded mechanism of genotoxicity in a given case. In particular, the demonstration of a coincidence of genotoxicity and high levels of cytotoxicity, which seems to be a major factor for biologically non-relevant in vitro positive new pharmaceuticals, usually requires quite extensive testing. Hence, for new pharmaceuticals it is practice to provide in addition to in vitro results that may be thresholded a wealth of information from in vivo studies on genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, etc. the results of which help in assessing the biological relevance of in vitro positives. The regulatory acknowledgement of biologically non-relevant, thresholded mechanisms of (in vitro) genotoxicity in addition to those that are considered relevant for human risk ensures a better understanding of test results and is needed for the credibility of genotoxicity testing practice in general.     

Polymorphisms in DNA repair and environmental interactions

The repair of damage to DNA is critical to the survival of a cell. However, not all organisms nor all individuals express a similar response to challenges to their genetic material. Numerous polymorphisms in genes involved in DNA repair have been found in individuals with DNA repair-related disease as well as in the general population. Studies of these variants are critical in understanding the response of the cell to DNA damage. In some cases, these changes predispose the carrier to a greatly increased risk of cancer. In other cases, the effects are subtler and depend on interactions between the alleles of several genes, or with environmental factors. Consequently, the health effects of exposure to genotoxic or carcinogenic compounds or agents can depend on the variations in these genes. This review will highlight some of the effects that variants, found in many of the genes involved in human DNA repair pathways, have on the response to damage, and their role in susceptibility of the cell and organism to environmental genotoxins. This review will concentrate on the mismatch repair, nucleotide repair, base excision repair, strand break repair, and direct alkyl repair pathways.     

Report of the IWGT working group on strategies and interpretation of regulatory in vivo tests I. Increases in micronucleated bone marrow cells in rodents that do not indicate genotoxic hazards

In vivo genotoxicity tests play a pivotal role in genotoxicity testing batteries. They are used both to determine if potential genotoxicity observed in vitro is realised in vivo and to detect any genotoxic carcinogens that are poorly detected in vitro. It is recognised that individual in vivo genotoxicity tests have limited sensitivity but good specificity. Thus, a positive result from the established in vivo assays is taken as strong evidence for genotoxic carcinogenicity of the compound tested. However, there is a growing body of evidence that compound-related disturbances in the physiology of the rodents used in these assays can result in increases in micronucleated cells in the bone marrow that are not related to the intrinsic genotoxicity of the compound under test. For rodent bone marrow or peripheral blood micronucleus tests, these disturbances include changes in core body temperature (hypothermia and hyperthermia) and increases in erythropoiesis following prior toxicity to erythroblasts or by direct stimulation of cell division in these cells. This paper reviews relevant data from the literature and also previously unpublished data obtained from a questionnaire devised by the IWGT working group. Regulatory implications of these findings are discussed and flow diagrams have been provided to aid in interpretation and decision-making when such changes in physiology are suspected.     

Enhancement of bleomycin-induced micronucleus formation in V79 cells as a rapid and sensitive screen for non-covalent DNA-binding compounds.

Non-covalent drug/DNA interactions are difficult to study and because of this, the significance of such interactions from a safety standpoint and their contribution to positive genetic toxicology test findings is poorly understood. It is shown in the present study that such interactions may be detected and quantified in Chinese hamster V79 cells by an adaptation of the bleomycin amplification assay. This assay measures the ability of a test compound to enhance the DNA damaging activity of the antibiotic bleomycin using micronucleus formation as an endpoint. Results are presented examining the bleomycin amplification activity of known intercalating agents, groove-binding agents and other structurally diverse classes of compounds for which intercalative status has not been reported. The assay reveals a strong and predictable SAR for amplification activity based on number and orientation of aromatic rings. Moreover, excellent correlations are observed between DNA binding (viscometric analyses) and DNA amplification in V79 cells for a series of seven experimental compounds. The assay is shown to be useful in understanding the genotoxicity of marketed antihistamines and to help explain genetic toxicology findings observed in a series of novel pharmaceutical entities. It is proposed that assessment of bleomycin amplification activity of novel compounds in early genotoxicity prescreening may provide important information upon which to base synthesis of compounds with minimal or no genotoxic liability.     

Genotoxicity investigations on nanomaterials: Methods,preparation and characterization of test material,potential artifacts and limitations—Many questions,some answers

Nanomaterials display novel properties to which most toxicologists have not consciously been exposed before the advent of their practical use. The same properties, small size and particular shape, large surface area and surface activity, which make nanomaterials attractive in many applications, may contribute to their toxicological profile. This review describes what is known about genotoxicity investigations on nanomaterials published in the openly available scientific literature to-date. The most frequently used test was the Comet assay: 19 studies, 14 with positive outcome. The second most frequently used test was the micronucleus test: 14 studies, 12 of them with positive outcome. The Ames test, popular with other materials, was less frequently used (6 studies) and was almost always negative, the bacterial cell wall possibly being a barrier for many nanomaterials. Recommendations for improvements emerging from analyzing the reports summarized in this review are: Know what nanomaterial has been tested (and in what form); Consider uptake and distribution of the nanomaterial; Use standardized methods; Recognize that nanomaterials are not all the same; Use in vivo studies to correlate in vitro results; Take nanomaterials specific properties into account; Learn about the mechanism of nanomaterials genotoxic effects. It is concluded that experiences with other, non-nano, substances (molecules and larger particles) taught us that mechanisms of genotoxic effects can be diverse and their elucidation can be demanding, while there often is an immediate need to assess the genotoxic hazard. Thus a practical, pragmatic approach is the use of a battery of standard genotoxicity testing methods covering a wide range of mechanisms. Application of these standard methods to nanomaterials demands adaptations and the interpretation of results from the genotoxicity tests may need additional considerations. This review should help to improve standard genotoxicity testing as well as investigations on the underlying mechanism and the interpretation of genotoxicity data on nanomaterials.     

IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. International Programme on Chemical Safety

The purpose of these guidelines is to provide concise guidance on the planning, performing and interpretation of studies to monitor groups or individuals exposed to genotoxic agents. Most human carcinogens are genotoxic but not all genotoxic agents have been shown to be carcinogenic in humans. Although the main interest in these studies is due to the association of genotoxicity with carcinogenicity, there is also an inherent interest in monitoring human genotoxicity independently of cancer as an endpoint.The most often studied genotoxicity endpoints have been selected for inclusion in this document and they are structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations assessed using cytogenetic methods (classical chromosomal aberration analysis (CA), fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), micronuclei (MN)); DNA damage (adducts, strand breaks, crosslinking, alkali-labile sites) assessed using bio-chemical/electrophoretic assays or sister chromatid exchanges (SCE); protein adducts; and hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) mutations. The document does not consider germ cells or gene mutation assays other than HPRT or markers of oxidative stress, which have been applied on a more limited scale.     

Interpretation of the biological relevance of genotoxicity test results: the importance of thresholds

Despite recent improvements in genotoxicity protocols, we have observed an increase in the occurrence of positive results, particularly in chromosomal aberration tests in vitro, yet very few of these are accompanied by positive responses in vivo. Thus, the positive results may not be biologically relevant either for rodents or humans in vivo, but how should we determine "biological relevance"? Chemicals that produce thresholded dose-responses may well not pose a genotoxic risk at low (relevant to human) exposures, but thresholds should not just be "seen"; there must be an explanation and understanding of the underlying mechanism. In addition to extremes of pH, ionic strength and osmolality, as have been identified previously, such mechanisms include indirect genotoxicity resulting from interaction with non-DNA targets, chemicals/metabolites which are inherently genotoxic but which, at low concentrations, are effectively conjugated and unable to form adducts, and production of specific metabolites under in vitro conditions that are not formed in rodents or humans in vivo. If such thresholded mechanisms can be identified at exposures which are well in excess of expected human exposure, then there may be a strong argument that the positive results are not biologically relevant.     

Climate change and its effects on terrestrial insects and herbivory patterns

Climate change and extreme weather events affect plants and animals and the direct impact of anthropogenic climate change has been documented extensively over the past years. In this review, I address the main consequences of elevated CO2 and O3 concentrations, elevated temperature and changes in rainfall patterns on the interactions between insects and their host plants. Because of their tight relationship with host plants, insect herbivores are expected to suffer direct and indirect effects of climate change through the changes experienced by their host plants, with consequences to population dynamics, community structure and ecosystem functioning.     

Genetic ecotoxicology: an overview

The techniques currently available for detecting genotoxin exposure are briefly described and evaluated with regard to the goals of genetic ecotoxicology. The occurrence and significance of genotoxin-induced neoplasia in marine organisms is described. Although there are numerous examples of hotspots where tumour incidences in fish and shellfish have been correlated with raised concentrations of anthropogenic chemicals, causal mechanisms are seldom established. Insufficient information is available to gauge the seriousness of genotoxicity for marine organisms on regional or global scales. The possibility of using marine organisms as sentinels to provide early warning of potential threats to Man is examined. Recognition of the genotoxic disease syndrome in lower animals highlights the need to explore the relationships between DNA damage (adduct formation, gene mutations, etc.) and its phenotypic consequences. Within a given population, not all individuals are equally susceptible to pollutant toxicity (including genotoxicity). The potential for using similarities in phenotypic traits to recognise subsets of individuals within populations possessing similar genotypes is discussed. Changes in heterozygosity and the evolution of genetically resistant populations following exposure to pollution are evaluated in the context of genetic ecotoxicology. Risk assessment procedures are required which enable genotoxin exposure to be related to specific consequences at the community and ecosystem levels. This necessitates both a sound scientific understanding of the mechanisms involved and the development of pragmatic ecotoxicological tools that can be employed by environmental managers.     

A microplate version of the DNA-synthesis inhibition test for rapid detection of DNA-alteration potentials

A microplate version of the DNA-synthesis inhibition test (DIT) for fast detection of DNA-alteration potentials has been developed. The DIT is based on the concept that DNA damage causes inhibition of DNA synthesis that becomes detectable some time after replicating cells have been in contact with genotoxic agents. In this test procedure human tissue culture cells (HeLa S3), prelabeled with [14C]thymidine, arfe exposed for 90 min to the substances in question. After the cells are rinsed, they are allowed to recover for 2 1/2 h in fresh culture medium, thereby unspecific interactions interfering with DNA replication are practically eliminated. Next, [3H]thymidine is added for 30 min, and then the cells are harvested and thoroughly rinsed. Finally, incorporated radioactivity is determined by liquid scintillation counting for measurement of the 3H/14C ratio. This allows for the evaluation of DNA synthesis during the 3H-labeling period and of the extent of genotoxic damage. This microplate version of the DIT can be carried out fully automated in a laboratory workstation. The test is compared to other tests for genotoxicity. Its advantages are discussed.     

DNA damage induced by genotoxicants in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos after contact exposure to freeze-dried sediment and sediment extracts from Laguna Lake (The Philippines) as measured by the comet assay

Laguna Lake, Philippines, is utilised as a resource for drinking and irrigation water and a major source of animal protein for more than 11 million residents. However, it also serves as a huge sink for anthropogenic pollutants from a variety of direct or indirect discharges. Given their well-known properties to accumulate organic pollutants, Lake Laguna sediments have been investigated by use of a newly developed sediment-contact assay to determine the bioavailable fraction of the total genotoxic hazard potential. Freshly fertilized zebrafish eggs (2 h after fertilization) were allowed to develop while exposed to different concentrations of freeze-dried sediments (exposure to bioavailable compounds) as well as organic extracts (complete genotoxic hazard potential including bioaccumulation) prepared from sediments collected at five sites within the lake. Following a 96 h exposure, single-cell suspensions were prepared from macerated larvae and analyzed for DNA strand-breaks by use of the comet assay. Genotoxicity could be identified in both solid-phase exposure scenarios as well as after exposure to organic sediment extracts. Only the South Bay (SB) site did not show a significant genotoxic burden relative to controls in tests of both freeze-dried sediment and organic extracts. In contrast, the Northwest Bay site displayed pronounced genotoxicity to the zebrafish embryos in both exposure scenarios. Perylene and copper in the sediments could be identified as potential causes of the genotoxic response. To compare the results (maximum induction coefficients) of zebrafish embryos with an established comet protocol, rainbow trout liver cells (RTL-W1) were exposed to the same extracts. The findings correlated well (Spearman correlation r=0.90), proving a good reliability of the results from zebrafish primary cells. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the bioavailable fraction of the genotoxic pollutants may pose a threat for both benthic organisms and human health via drinking-water and fish consumption.     

Cobalt and antimony: genotoxicity and carcinogenicity

The purpose of this review is to summarise the data concerning genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of Co and Sb. Both metals have multiple industrial and/or therapeutical applications, depending on the considered species. Cobalt is used for the production of alloys and hard metal (cemented carbide), diamond polishing, drying agents, pigments and catalysts. Occupational exposure to cobalt may result in adverse health effects in different organs or tissues. Antimony trioxide is primarily used as a flame retardant in rubber, plastics, pigments, adhesives, textiles, and paper. Antimony potassium tartrate has been used worldwide as an anti-shistosomal drug. Pentavalent antimony compounds have been used for the treatment of leishmaniasis. Co(II) ions are genotoxic in vitro and in vivo, and carcinogenic in rodents. Co metal is genotoxic in vitro. Hard metal dust, of which occupational exposure is linked to an increased lung cancer risk, is proven to be genotoxic in vitro and in vivo. Possibly, production of active oxygen species and/or DNA repair inhibition are mechanisms involved. Given the recently provided proof for in vitro and in vivo genotoxic potential of hard metal dust, the mechanistic evidence of elevated production of active oxygen species and the epidemiological data on increased cancer risk, it may be advisable to consider the possibility of a new evaluation by IARC. Both trivalent and pentavalent antimony compounds are generally negative in non-mammalian genotoxicity tests, while mammalian test systems usually give positive results for Sb(III) and negative results for Sb(V) compounds. Assessment of the in vivo potential of Sb2O3 to induce chromosome aberrations (CA) gave conflicting results. Animal carcinogenicity data were concluded sufficient for Sb2O3 by IARC. Human carcinogenicity data is difficult to evaluate given the frequent co-exposure to arsenic. Possible mechanisms of action, including potential to produce active oxygen species and to interfere with DNA repair systems, still need further investigation.     

Thresholds in genotoxicity responses

It has been commonly accepted that risk assessments of genotoxic chemicals are based on linear extrapolation methods. However, there is substantial evidence that some chemicals may be genotoxic only at high doses by mechanisms that do not occur at low doses, or only under specific conditions in genotoxicity assays, but are inactive at concentrations within the range of human exposure levels. There are a variety of possible mechanisms of thresholded genotoxicity, including disruption of cell division and chromosome segregation, inhibition of DNA synthesis, overloading of oxidative defence mechanisms, metabolism or plasma binding capacity, disturbances of metal homeostasis, cytotoxicity and physiological perturbations in in vivo assays. The degrees of evidence supporting the proposed mechanisms are variable and not all are sufficiently robust to be universally accepted as yet by the scientific community. However, a survey of industrial companies indicated that data have been accepted by some regulatory authorities indicating thresholds contributing to genotoxicity responses.