RNA editing of the col mRNA throughout the life cycle of Physarum polycephalum

Editing of RNA via the insertion, deletion or substitution of genetic information affects gene expression in a variety of systems. Previous characterization of the Physarum polycephalum cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (col) mRNA revealed that both nucleotide insertions and base substitutions occur during the maturation of this mitochondrial message. Both types of editing are known to be developmentally regulated in other systems, including mammals and trypanosomatids. Here we show that the col mRNA present in Physarum mitochondria is edited via specific nucleotide insertions and C to U conversions at every stage of the life cycle. Primer extension sequencing of the RNA indicates that this editing is both accurate and efficient. Using a sensitive RT-PCR assay to monitor the extent of editing at individual sites of C insertion, we estimate that greater than 98% of the steady-state amount of col mRNA is edited throughout the Physarum developmental cycle.     

Association of Guide RNA Binding Protein gBP21 with Active RNA Editing Complexes in Trypanosoma brucei

RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria produces mature mRNAs by a series of enzyme-catalyzed reactions that specifically insert or delete uridylates in association with a macromolecular complex. Using a mitochondrial fraction enriched for in vitro RNA editing activity, we produced several monoclonal antibodies that are specific for a 21-kDa guide RNA (gRNA) binding protein initially identified by UV cross-linking. Immunofluorescence studies localize the protein to the mitochondrion, with a preference for the kinetoplast. The antibodies cause a supershift of previously identified gRNA-specific ribonucleoprotein complexes and immunoprecipitate in vitro RNA editing activities that insert and delete uridylates. The immunoprecipitated material also contains gRNA-specific endoribonuclease, terminal uridylyltransferase, and RNA ligase activities as well as gRNA and both edited and unedited mRNA. The immunoprecipitate contains numerous proteins, of which the 21-kDa protein, a 90-kDa protein, and novel 55- and 16-kDa proteins can be UV cross-linked to gRNA. These studies indicate that the 21-kDa protein associates with the ribonucleoprotein complex (or complexes) that catalyze RNA editing.     

Two Related RNA-editing Proteins Target the Same Sites in Mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana

The facilitators for specific cytosine-to-uridine RNA-editing events in plant mitochondria and plastids are pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR)-containing proteins with specific additional C-terminal domains. Here we report the related PPR proteins mitochondrial editing factor 8 (MEF8) and MEF8S with only five such repeats each to be both involved in RNA editing at the same two sites in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mutants of MEF8 show diminished editing in leaves but not in pollen, whereas mutants of the related protein MEF8S show reduced RNA editing in pollen but not in leaves. Overexpressed MEF8 or MEF8S both increase editing at the two target sites in a mef8 mutant. Double mutants of MEF8 and MEF8S are not viable although both identified target sites are in mRNAs for nonessential proteins. This suggests that MEF8 and MEF8S may have other essential functions beyond these two editing sites in complex I mRNAs.     

In vivo testing of a tobacco plastid DNA segment for guide RNA function in psbL editing

A C-to-U RNA editing event creates a functional initiation codon for translation of the psbL mRNA in tobacco plastids. Small trans-acting guide RNAs (gRNAs) have been shown to be involved in editing site selection in kinetoplastid mitochondria. A computer search of the tobacco plastid genome (ptDNA) identified such a putative gRNA, a 14-nucleotide sequence motif that is complementary to the psbL mRNA, including the A nucleotide required to direct the C-to-U change. The critical A nucleotide of the putative gRNA gene was changed to G by plastid transformation. We report here that the introduced mutation did not abolish psbL editing. Since no other region of the plastid genome contains significant complementarity to the psbL editing site we suggest that, if gRNAs serve as trans-acting factors for plastid psbL mRNA editing, they either have only a limited complementarity to the editing site, or are encoded in the nuclear genome.     

Nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions affect RNA editing of cox2, atp6 and atp9 in alloplasmic male-sterile rice (Oryza sativa L.) lines

RNA editing plays an important role in the regulation of mitochondrial gene expression in flowering plants. In this study, we examined RNA editing of the mitochondrial genes cox2, atp6 and atp9 in five isonuclear alloplasmic male-sterile lines (IAMSLs) of rice to investigate whether different cytoplasmic types affect RNA editing. Although many editing sites were conserved among the three genes, we found that the editing efficiency of certain sites was significantly different between different IAMSLs or between IAMSLs and their corresponding cytoplasmic donor CMS lines. Furthermore, several editing sites were found to be either present or absent in certain IAMSLs and their corresponding CMS lines. These results indicate that nuclear loci, as well as unknown editing factors within the mitochondria of different cytoplasmic types, may be involved in RNA editing, and they suggest that RNA editing in plant mitochondria is affected by nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions.     

Multiplex single-base extension typing to identify nuclear genes required for RNA editing in plant organelles

We developed a multiplex single-base extension single-nucleotide polymorphism-typing procedure for screening large numbers of plants for mutations in mitochondrial RNA editing. The high sensitivity of the approach detects changes in the RNA editing status generated in total cellular cDNA from pooled RNA preparations of up to 50 green plants. The method has been employed to tag several nuclear encoded genes required for RNA editing at specific sites in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. This approach will allow large-scale screening for mutations in genes encoding trans-factors for many types of RNA editing as well as for other RNA modifications.     

The DYW Subgroup PPR Protein MEF35 Targets RNA Editing Sites in the Mitochondrial rpl16, nad4 and cob mRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana

RNA editing in plant mitochondria and plastids alters specific nucleotides from cytidine (C) to uridine (U) mostly in mRNAs. A number of PLS-class PPR proteins have been characterized as RNA recognition factors for specific RNA editing sites, all containing a C-terminal extension, the E domain, and some an additional DYW domain, named after the characteristic C-terminal amino acid triplet of this domain. Presently the recognition factors for more than 300 mitochondrial editing sites are still unidentified. In order to characterize these missing factors, the recently proposed computational prediction tool could be of use to assign target RNA editing sites to PPR proteins of yet unknown function. Using this target prediction approach we identified the nuclear gene MEF35 (Mitochondrial Editing Factor 35) to be required for RNA editing at three sites in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. The MEF35 protein contains eleven PPR repeats and E and DYW extensions at the C-terminus. Two T-DNA insertion mutants, one inserted just upstream and the other inside the reading frame encoding the DYW domain, show loss of editing at a site in each of the mRNAs for protein 16 in the large ribosomal subunit (site rpl16-209), for cytochrome b (cob-286) and for subunit 4 of complex I (nad4-1373), respectively. Editing is restored upon introduction of the wild type MEF35 gene in the reading frame mutant. The MEF35 protein interacts in Y2H assays with the mitochondrial MORF1 and MORF8 proteins, mutation of the latter also influences editing at two of the three MEF35 target sites. Homozygous mutant plants develop indistinguishably from wild type plants, although the RPL16 and COB/CYTB proteins are essential and the amino acids encoded after the editing events are conserved in most plant species. These results demonstrate the feasibility of the computational target prediction to screen for target RNA editing sites of E domain containing PLS-class PPR proteins.     

The insect-phase gRNA transcriptome in Trypanosoma brucei

One of the most striking examples of small RNA regulation of gene expression is the process of RNA editing in the mitochondria of trypanosomes. In these parasites, RNA editing involves extensive uridylate insertions and deletions within most of the mitochondrial messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Over 1200 small guide RNAs (gRNAs) are predicted to be responsible for directing the sequence changes that create start and stop codons, correct frameshifts and for many of the mRNAs generate most of the open reading frame. In addition, alternative editing creates the opportunity for unprecedented protein diversity. In Trypanosoma brucei, the vast majority of gRNAs are transcribed from minicircles, which are approximately one kilobase in size, and encode between three and four gRNAs. The large number (5000–10 000) and their concatenated structure make them difficult to sequence. To identify the complete set of gRNAs necessary for mRNA editing in T. brucei, we used Illumina deep sequencing of purified gRNAs from the procyclic stage. We report a near complete set of gRNAs needed to direct the editing of the mRNAs.     

RNA editing in the cytochrome b locus of the higher plant Oenothera berteriana includes a U-to-C transition.

RNA editing in the cytochrome b locus of Oenothera berteriana mitochondria modified a number of cytidine nucleotides to uridines, mostly altering codon identities. One nucleotide alteration involved a reverse modification changing a genomic thymidine to a cytidine in the cDNA sequence. The enzymatic editing activity in higher-plant mitochondria thus appears to be able to catalyze the interconversion of pyrimidines in both directions at specific nucleotides in the mRNA template.     

MEF10 is required for RNA editing at nad2-842 in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana and interacts with MORF8

A forwards genetic screen of a chemically mutated plant population identified mitochondrial RNA editing factor 10 (MEF10) in Arabidopsis thaliana. MEF10 is a trans-factor required specifically for the C to U editing of site nad2-842. The MEF10 protein is characterized by a stretch of pentatricopeptide repeats (PPR) and a C-terminal extension domain ending with the amino acids DYW. Editing is lost in mutant plants but is recovered by transgenic introduction of an intact MEF10 gene. The MEF10 protein interacts with multiple organellar RNA editing factor 8 (MORF8) but not with other mitochondrial MORF proteins in yeast two hybrid assays. These results support the model that specific combinations of MORF and MEF proteins are involved in RNA editing in plant mitochondria.     

Molecular and Functional Diversity of RNA Editing in Plant Mitochondria

RNA editing is a fundamental biochemical process relating to the modification of nucleotides in messenger RNAs of functional genes in cells. RNA editing leads to re-establishment of conserved amino acid residues for functional proteins in nuclei, chloroplasts, and mitochondria. Identification of RNA editing factors that contributes to target site recognition increases our understanding of RNA editing mechanisms. Significant progress has been made in recent years in RNA editing studies for both animal and plant cells. RNA editing in nuclei and mitochondria of animal cells and in chloroplast of plant cells has been extensively documented and reviewed. RNA editing has been also extensively documented on plant mitochondria. However, functional diversity of RNA editing factors in plant mitochondria is not overviewed. Here, we review the biological significance of RNA editing, recent progress on the molecular mechanisms of RNA editing process, and function diversity of editing factors in plant mitochondrial research. We will focus on: (1) pentatricopeptide repeat proteins in Arabidopsis and in crop plants; (2) the progress of RNA editing process in plant mitochondria; (3) RNA editing-related RNA splicing; (4) RNA editing associated flower development; (5) RNA editing modulated male sterile; (6) RNA editing-regulated cell signaling; and (7) RNA editing involving abiotic stress. Advances described in this review will be valuable in expanding our understanding in RNA editing. The diverse functions of RNA editing in plant mitochondria will shed light on the investigation of molecular mechanisms that underlies plant development and abiotic stress tolerance.