Interaction with a lipid membrane: a key step in bacterial toxins virulence

Bacterial toxins are secreted as soluble proteins. However, they have to interact with a cell lipid membrane either to permeabilize the cells (pore forming toxins) or to enter into the cytosol to express their enzymatic activity (translocation toxins). The aim of this review is to suggest that the strategies developed by toxins to insert in a lipid membrane is mediated by their structure. Two categories, which contains both pore forming and translocation toxins, are emerging: alpha helical proteins containing hydrophobic domains and beta sheets proteins in which no hydrophobicity can be clearly detected. The first category would rather interact with the membrane through multi-spanning helical domains whereas the second category would form a beta barrel in the membrane.     

Penetration of protein toxins into cells

AB toxins deliver their enzymatically active A domain to the cytosol. Some AB-toxins are able to penetrate cellular membranes from endosomes where the low pH triggers their translocation. One such toxin is diphtheria toxin and important features of its translocation mechanism have been unraveled during the last year. Other toxins depend on retrograde transport through the secretory pathway to the ER before translocation, and recent findings suggest that these toxins take advantage of the ER translocation machinery normally used for transport of cellular proteins. In addition, the intracellular targets of many of these toxins have been identified recently.     

The chaperone Hsp90 and PPIases of the cyclophilin and FKBP families facilitate membrane translocation of Photorhabdus luminescens ADP‐ribosyltransferases

TccC3 and TccC5 from Photorhabdus luminescens are ADP‐ribosyltransferases, which modify actin and Rho GTPases, respectively, thereby inducing polymerization and clustering of actin. The bacterial proteins are components of the Photorhabdus toxin complexes, consisting of the binding and translocation component TcdA1, a proposed linker component TcdB2 and the enzymatic component TccC3/5. While the action of the toxins on target proteins is clearly defined, uptake and translocation of the toxins into the cytosol of target cells are not well understood. Here we show by using pharmacological inhibitors that heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerases (PPIases) including cyclophilins and FK506‐binding proteins (FKBPs) facilitate the uptake of the ADP‐ribosylating toxins into the host cell cytosol. Inhibition of Hsp90 and/or PPIases resulted in decreased intoxication of target cells by Photorhabdus toxin complexes determined by cell rounding and reduction of transepithelial electrical resistance of cell monolayers. ADP‐ribosyltransferase activity of toxins and toxin‐induced pore formation were notimpaired by the inhibitors of Hsp90 and PPIases. The Photorhabdus toxins interacted with Hsp90, FKBP51, Cyp40 and CypA, suggesting a role of these host cell factors in translocation and/or refolding of the ADP‐ribosyltransferases.     

Toxin entry: how bacterial proteins get into mammalian cells

Certain bacteria secrete protein toxins that catalytically modify and disrupt essential processes in mammalian cells, often leading to cell death. As the substrates modified by these toxins are located in the mammalian cell cytosol, a catalytically active toxin polypeptide must reach this compartment in order to act. The toxins bind to receptors on the surface of susceptible cells and enter them by endocytic uptake. Endocytosed toxins initially accumulate in endosomes, where some of these proteins take advantage of the acidic environment within these organelles to form, or contribute to the formation of, protein-conducting channels through which the catalytic polypeptide is able to translocate into the cytosol. Other toxins are unable to respond to low pH in this way and must undergo intracellular vesicular transport to reach a compartment where pre-existing protein-conducting channels occur and can be exploited for membrane translocation — the endoplasmic reticulum. In this way, cell entry by this second group of toxins demonstrates that the secretory pathway of mammalian cells is completely reversible.     

Bacterial protein toxins acting on intracellular targets

A number of bacterial toxins act on targets located in the cytosol. Diphtheria toxin, Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A and shigella toxin inhibit protein synthesis by enzymatic inactivation of elongation factor 2 or the 60 S ribosomal subunit. These toxins enter the cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis, followed by translocation across the membranes of intracellular organelles. Also a number or toxins that are not cytocidal act on targets in the cytosol. A number of nontoxic bacterial proteins are able to modify enzymatically intracellular molecules. Some of these proteins could be considered for targeting to special cells followed by translocation to obtain defined physiological effects.     

Structural microbiology at the pathogen-host interface

Bacterial pathogens achieve the internalization of a multitude of virulence factors into eukaryotic cells. Some secrete extracellular toxins which bring about their own entry, usually by hijacking cell surface receptors and endocytic pathways. Others possess specialized secretion and translocation systems to directly inject bacterial proteins into the host cytosol. Recent advances in the structural biology of these virulence factors has begun to reveal at the molecular level how these bacterial proteins are delivered and modulate host activities ranging from cytoskeletal structure to cell cycle progression.     

The proton‐motive force is required for translocation of CDI toxins across the inner membrane of target bacteria

Contact‐dependent growth inhibition (CDI) is a mode of bacterial competition orchestrated by the CdiB/CdiA family of two‐partner secretion proteins. The CdiA effector extends from the surface of CDI⁺ inhibitor cells, binds to receptors on neighbouring bacteria and delivers a toxin domain derived from its C‐terminal region (CdiA‐CT). Here, we show that CdiA‐CT toxin translocation requires the proton‐motive force (pmf) within target bacteria. The pmf is also critical for the translocation of colicin toxins, which exploit the energized Ton and Tol systems to cross the outer membrane. However, CdiA‐CT translocation is clearly distinct from known colicin‐import pathways because ΔtolA ΔtonB target cells are fully sensitive to CDI. Moreover, we provide evidence that CdiA‐CT toxins can be transferred into the periplasm of de‐energized target bacteria, indicating that transport across the outer membrane is independent of the pmf. Remarkably, CDI toxins transferred under de‐energized conditions remain competent to enter the target‐cell cytoplasm once the pmf is restored. Collectively, these results indicate that outer‐ and inner‐membrane translocation steps can be uncoupled, and that the pmf is required for CDI toxin transport from the periplasm to the target‐cell cytoplasm.     

Transport of protein toxins into cells: pathways used by ricin,cholera toxin and Shiga toxin

Ricin, cholera, and Shiga toxin belong to a family of protein toxins that enter the cytosol to exert their action. Since all three toxins are routed from the cell surface through the Golgi apparatus and to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) before translocation to the cytosol, the toxins are used to study different endocytic pathways as well as the retrograde transport to the Golgi and the ER. The toxins can also be used as vectors to carry other proteins into the cells. Studies with protein toxins reveal that there are more pathways along the plasma membrane to ER route than originally believed.     

The interaction between RTX toxins and target cells.

RTX toxins are important virulence factors produced by a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria. They fall into two categories: the hemolysins, which affect a variety of cell types, and the leukotoxins, which are cell-type- and species-specific. These toxins offer interesting models for targeting, insertion and translocation of aqueous proteins into lipid membranes.     

Endosomes and toxin translocation

In this review we discuss data obtained by our group regarding the entry of toxins, especially ricin, diphtheria toxin (DT) and Pseudomonas exotoxin A (PE) into animal cells. We studied the translocation process of these toxins using endosomes purified from lymphocytes. This process is rate-limiting for toxicity and enables these toxins to reach the cytosol where they will inactivate the protein synthesis system and kill the cell. We could show that each of these toxins uses a different strategy to cross the endosome membrane. Whereas ricin transmembrane transport only relies on cytosolic ATP hydrolysis, PE first requires exposure to the low endosomal pH (pH-6), presumably to insert into the endosome membrane, before being translocated via a process which also requires cytosolic ATP hydrolysis. DT translocation is directly triggered and energized by the endosome-cytosol pH gradient. Using conjugates with dihydrofolate reductase we could indirectly show that ricin and PE require unfolding for translocation. A deletion approach enabled to produce a more cytotoxic PE mutant by increasing its translocation activity.     

About lipids and toxins

Many mono or multicellular organisms secrete soluble proteins, referred to as protein toxins, which alter the behavior of foreign, or target cells, possibly leading to their death. These toxins affect either the cell membrane by forming pores or modifying lipids, or some intracellular target. To reach this target, they must cross one of the cellular membranes, generally that of an intracellular organelle. As described in this minireview, lipids play crucial roles in the intoxication process of most if not all toxins, by allowing/promoting binding, endocytosis, trafficking and/or translocation into the cytoplasm.     

Autoprocessing of the Vibrio cholerae RTX toxin by the cysteine protease domain

Vibrio cholerae RTX is a large multifunctional bacterial toxin that causes actin crosslinking. Due to its size, it was predicted to undergo proteolytic cleavage during translocation into host cells to deliver activity domains to the cytosol. In this study, we identified a domain within the RTX toxin that is conserved in large clostridial glucosylating toxins TcdB, TcdA, TcnA, and TcsL; putative toxins from V. vulnificus, Yersinia sp., Photorhabdus sp., and Xenorhabdus sp.; and a filamentous/hemagglutinin-like protein FhaL from Bordetella sp. In vivo transfection studies and in vitro characterization of purified recombinant protein revealed that this domain from the V. cholerae RTX toxin is an autoprocessing cysteine protease whose activity is stimulated by the intracellular environment. A cysteine point mutation within the RTX holotoxin attenuated actin crosslinking activity suggesting that processing of the toxin is an important step in toxin translocation. Overall, we have uncovered a new mechanism by which large bacterial toxins and proteins deliver catalytic activities to the eukaryotic cell cytosol by autoprocessing after translocation.     

Pseudomonas exotoxin: chimeric toxins

Pseudomonas exotoxin binds to and enters cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Within the cell it requires exposure to low pH to enable it to translocate to the cell cytoplasm where it inhibits protein synthesis by ADP-ribosylating elongation factor 2. The toxin has three main structural domains whose functions are: Ia, cell binding; II, translocation; and III, ADP-ribosylation. Key amino acids have been identified within each domain that are required for the function of the toxin. Chimeric toxins were made originally by using chemical cross-linking reagents to couple Pseudomonas exotoxin (or other toxins) to cell-binding proteins. More recently, a variety of Pseudomonas exotoxin-related chimeric toxins have been made by gene fusion technology. These chimeric toxins may be useful clinically for treating various diseases and experimentally for understanding receptor function.     

Glycosphingolipids as toxin receptors

A number of proteins produced by certain bacteria and plants are potently toxic to mammalian cells. This toxicity results from their ability to catalytically modify macromolecules that are required for essential cellular functions such as vesicular trafficking, cytoskeletal assembly, signalling or protein synthesis. To reach their targets, these proteins bind specific surface receptors before endocytosis and translocation across an internal membrane. The surface receptors exploited by different toxins include a range of proteins and lipids. Here we focus on specific glycosphingolipid receptors and two well-characterised subsets of toxins that exploit them for surface binding, intracellular trafficking, and signalling events.     

Potentiation and cellular phenotypes of the insecticidal Toxin complexes of Photorhabdus bacteria

The toxin complex (tc) genes of bacteria comprise a large and growing family whose mode of action remains obscure. In the insect pathogen Photorhabdus, tc genes encode high molecular weight insecticidal toxins with oral activity against caterpillar pests. One protein, TcdA, has recently been expressed in transgenic plants and shown to confer insect resistance. These toxins therefore represent alternatives to toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) for deployment in transgenic crops. Levels of TcdA expression in transgenic plants were, however, low and the full toxicity associated with the native toxin was not reconstituted. Here we show that increased activity of the toxin TcdA1 requires potentiation by either of two pairs of gene products, TcdB1 and TccC1 or TcdB2 and TccC3. Moreover, these same pairs of proteins can also cross-potentiate a second toxin, TcaA1B1. To elucidate the likely functional domains present in these large proteins, we expressed fragments of each 'toxin' or 'potentiator' gene within mammalian cells. Several domains produced abnormal cellular morphologies leading to cell death, while others showed specific phenotypes such as nuclear translocation. Our results prove that the Tc toxins are complex proteins with multiple functional domains. They also show that both toxin genes and their potentiator pairs will need to be expressed to reconstitute full activity in insect-resistant transgenic plants. Moreover, they suggest that the same potentiator pair will be able to cross-potentiate more than one toxin in a single plant.     

核糖体失活蛋白在细胞内的转运途径

核糖体失活蛋白（ribosome—inactivating proteins,RIPs）是一类抑制蛋白质生物合成的毒蛋白,现已成为研究细胞生物学的重要工具并在临床抗肿瘤和抗病毒治疗上得到了广泛应用。现结合国内外近几年的研究进展就核糖体失活蛋白在细胞内的转运途径作一综述。     

Uptake of binary actin ADP-ribosylating toxins

The focus of this article is on the cellular uptake mechanism of the family of binary actin ADP-ribosylating toxins from clostridia. These toxins are special-type AB toxins, because they are composed of two nonlinked proteins, which have to assemble on the surface of eukaryotic cells to act cytotoxically. The enzymatically active component (A), ADP-ribosylates G-actin in the cytosol of target cells. This leads to a complete depolymerization of the actin filaments and, thereby, to rounding up of cultured cells. The second component of these toxins, the binding/translocation component (B), mediates the transport of the enzyme component into the cytosol.     

Inositol Hexakisphosphate-Induced Autoprocessing of Large Bacterial Protein Toxins

Large bacterial protein toxins autotranslocate functional effector domains to the eukaryotic cell cytosol, resulting in alterations to cellular functions that ultimately benefit the infecting pathogen. Among these toxins, the clostridial glucosylating toxins (CGTs) produced by Gram-positive bacteria and the multifunctional-autoprocessing RTX (MARTX) toxins of Gram-negative bacteria have distinct mechanisms for effector translocation, but a shared mechanism of post-translocation autoprocessing that releases these functional domains from the large holotoxins. These toxins carry an embedded cysteine protease domain (CPD) that is activated for autoprocessing by binding inositol hexakisphosphate (InsP₆), a molecule found exclusively in eukaryotic cells. Thus, InsP₆-induced autoprocessing represents a unique mechanism for toxin effector delivery specifically within the target cell. This review summarizes recent studies of the structural and molecular events for activation of autoprocessing for both CGT and MARTX toxins, demonstrating both similar and potentially distinct aspects of autoprocessing among the toxins that utilize this method of activation and effector delivery.     

Clostridium difficile toxins A and B: Receptors,pores, and translocation into cells

The most potent toxins secreted by pathogenic bacteria contain enzymatic moieties that must reach the cytosol of target cells to exert their full toxicity. Toxins such as anthrax, diphtheria, and botulinum toxin all use three well-defined functional domains to intoxicate cells: a receptor-binding moiety that triggers endocytosis into acidified vesicles by binding to a specific host-cell receptor, a translocation domain that forms pores across the endosomal membrane in response to acidic pH, and an enzyme that translocates through these pores to catalytically inactivate an essential host cytosolic substrate. The homologous toxins A (TcdA) and Toxin B (TcdB) secreted by Clostridium difficile are large enzyme-containing toxins that for many years have eluded characterization. The cell-surface receptors for these toxins, the non-classical nature of the pores that they form in membranes, and mechanism of translocation have remained undefined, exacerbated, in part, by the lack of any structural information for the central ～1000 amino acid translocation domain. Recent advances in the identification of receptors for TcdB, high-resolution structural information for the translocation domain, and a model for the pore have begun to shed light on the mode-of-action of these toxins. Here, we will review TcdA/TcdB uptake and entry into mammalian cells, with focus on receptor binding, endocytosis, pore formation, and translocation. We will highlight how these toxins diverge from classical models of translocating toxins, and offer our perspective on key unanswered questions for TcdA/TcdB binding and entry into mammalian cells.     

Identification of the secretion and translocation domain of the enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli effector Cif, using TEM-1 beta-lactamase as a new fluorescence-based reporter

Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC and EHEC) strains are human and animal pathogens that inject effector proteins into host cells via a type III secretion system (TTSS). Cif is an effector protein which induces host cell cycle arrest and reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. Cif is encoded by a lambdoid prophage present in most of the EPEC and EHEC strains. In this study, we analyzed the domain that targets Cif to the TTSS by using a new reporter system based on a translational fusion of the effector proteins with mature TEM-1 beta-lactamase. Translocation was detected directly in living host cells by using the fluorescent beta-lactamase substrate CCF2/AM. We show that the first 16 amino acids (aa) of Cif were necessary and sufficient to mediate translocation into the host cells. Similarly, the first 20 aa of the effector proteins Map, EspF, and Tir, which are encoded in the same region as the TTSS, mediated secretion and translocation in a type III-dependent but chaperone-independent manner. A truncated form of Cif lacking its first 20 aa was no longer secreted and translocated, but fusion with the first 20 aa of Tir, Map, or EspF restored both secretion and translocation. In addition, the chimeric proteins were fully able to trigger host cell cycle arrest and stress fiber formation. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that Cif is composed of a C-terminal effector domain and an exchangeable N-terminal translocation signal and that the TEM-1 reporter system is a convenient tool for the study of the translocation of toxins or effector proteins into host cells.