Anthropometric risk factors for colorectal polyps in African-American women

Objective: Colorectal adenomas are thought to be precursor lesions to colorectal cancer, a leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality in African‐American women. Studies suggest that obesity is associated with risk of adenomas in white women, but little is known about the relation in African‐American women. We prospectively examined the association between selected anthropometric factors and colorectal polyps in African‐American women. Methods and Procedures: Data were obtained from the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS), a prospective cohort study of African‐American women. From 1997 to 2003, we followed 33,403 women aged ≥30 years with no prior diagnosis of cancer or polyps. Cox regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of polyps, with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: After 211,797 person‐years of follow‐up, 1,189 cases of colorectal polyps were reported. The IRR comparing women with a current BMI ≥35 to <25 kg/m² was 1.35 (95% CI = 1.12–1.62), after adjustment for covariates including waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR). Women who gained ≥30 kg since age 18 were 1.76 times as likely as those who gained <5 kg to report polyps (95% CI = 1.33–2.33). The IRR comparing the highest (≥0.87) to lowest (<0.71) quintiles of WHR was 1.26 (95% CI = 1.04–1.54), after adjustment for covariates including BMI. BMI at age 18, adult height, and waist circumference (BMI‐adjusted) were not materially associated with risk. Results were similar among women with a recent endoscopy. Discussion: Weight gain and obesity in adulthood may increase the risk of colorectal polyps in African‐American women.     

Ethnic Differences in Visceral Adipose Tissue and Type 2 Diabetes: Filipino,African‐American,and White Women

Objective: To compare ethnic differences in visceral adipose tissue (VAT), assessed by computed tomography, and type 2 diabetes risk among 55‐ to 80‐year‐old Filipino, African‐American, and white women without known cardiovascular disease. Research Methods and Procedures: Subjects were participants in the Rancho Bernardo Study (n = 196), the Filipino Women's Health Study (n = 181), and the Health Assessment Study of African‐American Women (n = 193). Glucose and anthropometric measurements were assessed between 1995 and 2002. Results: African‐American women had significantly higher age‐adjusted BMI (29.7 kg/m²) and waist girth (88.1 cm) compared with Filipino (BMI, 25.5 kg/m²; waist girth, 81.9 cm) or white (BMI: 26.0 kg/m²; waist girth: 80.7 cm) women. However, VAT was significantly higher among Filipino (69.1 cm³) compared with white (62.3 cm³; p = 0.037) or African‐American (57.5 cm³, p < 0.001) women. VAT correlated better with BMI (r = 0.69) and waist (r = 0.77) in whites, compared with Filipino (r = 0.42; r = 0.59) or African‐American (r = 0.50; r = 0.56) women. Age‐adjusted type 2 diabetes prevalence was significantly higher in Filipinas (32.1%) than in white (5.8%) or African‐American (12.1%) women. Filipinas had higher type 2 diabetes risk compared with African Americans [adjusted odds ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09 to 4.86] or whites (adjusted odds ratio, 7.51; 95% CI, 2.51 to 22.5) after adjusting for age, VAT, exercise, education, and alcohol intake. Discussion: VAT was highest among Filipinas despite similar BMI and waist circumference as whites. BMI and waist circumference were weaker estimates of VAT in Filipino and African‐American women than in whites. Type 2 diabetes prevalence was highest among Filipino women at every level of VAT, but VAT did not explain their elevated type 2 diabetes risk.     

Obesity in South Africa: The South African Demographic and Health Survey

Objectives: To ascertain the anthropometric profile and determinants of obesity in South Africans who participated in the Demographic and Health Survey in 1998. Research Methods and Procedures: A sample of 13,089 men and women (age, ≥15 years) were randomly selected and then stratified by province and urban and nonurban areas. Height, weight, mid-upper arm circumference, and waist and hip circumference were measured. Body mass index (BMI) was used as an indicator of obesity, and the waist/hip ratio (WHR) was used as an indicator of abdominal obesity. Multivariate regression identified sociodemographic predictors of BMI and waist circumference in the data. Results: Mean BMI values for men and women were 22.9 kg/m² and 27.1 kg/m², respectively. For men, 29.2% were overweight or obese (≥25 kg/m²) and 9.2% had abdominal obesity (WHR ≥1.0), whereas 56.6% of women were overweight or obese and 42% had abdominal obesity (WHR >0.85). Underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m²) was found in 12.2% of men and 5.6% of women. For men, 19% of the variation of BMI and 34% of the variation in waist circumference could be explained by age, level of education, population group, and area of residence. For women, these variables explained 16% of the variation of BMI and 24% of the variation in waist circumference. Obesity increased with age, and higher levels of obesity were found in urban African women. Discussion: Overnutrition is prevalent among adult South Africans, particularly women. Determinants of overnutrition include age, level of education, ethnicity, and area of residence.     

Associations of leukocyte telomere length with body anthropometric indices and weight change in chinese women

Objective: This study evaluated associations of telomere length with various anthropometric indices of general and abdominal obesity, as well as weight change. Design and Methods: The study included 2,912 Chinese women aged 40‐70 years. Monochrome multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction was applied to measure relative telomere length. Results: Telomere length was inversely associated with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist‐to‐height ratio, weight, and hip circumference (P_trend = 0.005, 0.004, 0.004, 0.010, and 0.026, respectively), but not waist‐to‐hip ratio (P_trend = 0.116) or height (P_trend = 0.675). Weight change since age 50 was further evaluated among women over age 55. Women who maintained their weight within ±5% since age 50, particularly within a normal range (BMI = 18.5‐24.9 kg/m²), or reduced their weight from overweight (BMI = 25‐29.9 kg/m²) or obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) to normal range, had a longer mean of current telomere length than women who gained weight since age 50 (P_trend = 0.025), particularly those who stayed in obesity or gained weight from normal range or overweight to obesity (P = 0.023). Conclusion: Our findings show that telomere shortening is associated with obesity and that maintaining body weight within a normal range helps maintain telomere length.     

Obesity and C-reactive protein levels among white, black, and hispanic US adults

Objective: Studies suggest that obesity's adverse impact on cardiovascular mortality may be reduced in African Americans relative to white Americans. We examined whether obesity's association with novel cardiovascular risk factors such as C‐reactive protein (CRP) also varies by race and ethnicity. Methods and Procedures: We analyzed data from 10,492 white, African‐American, and Hispanic‐American participants of the 1999–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, who were aged 20 years and older, with a BMI ≥18.5 kg/m² and CRP ≤10 mg/l. We fit sex‐specific multivariable models of the association of BMI or waist circumference with log CRP levels and tested for interactions of BMI or waist circumference with race/ethnicity. Results: Higher BMI was significantly associated with higher CRP in all racial/ethnic groups for both men and women (P > 0.05 for BMI–race/ethnicity interaction) before and after adjustment for age, education, and health behaviors. Larger waist circumference was also associated with higher CRP levels in all racial/ethnic groups before and after adjustment; among women, the relationship was strongest for Mexican Hispanics (P < 0.01 for waist circumference–race/ethnicity interaction). Results were similar after additional adjustment for medications that might affect CRP levels. Discussion: The association between obesity and CRP is at least as strong in African Americans and Hispanic Americans as in white Americans. Racial differences in the relationship between obesity and cardiovascular mortality are unlikely to be due to racial differences in obesity's impact on CRP.     

Associations of Fat Distribution and Obesity with Hypertension in a Bi‐ethnic Population: The ARIC Study

Objective: To examine associations of hypertension with obesity and fat distribution among African American and white men and women. Research Methods and Procedures: The analysis sample included 15,063 African American and white men and women between the ages of 45 and 64 years who were participants in the 1987 through 1989 examination of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). Odds ratios and adjusted prevalences of hypertension were calculated across sexspecific quintiles of body mass index (BMI), waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference, and waist‐to‐height ratio (waist/height) and adjusted for age, research center, smoking, education, physical activity, alcohol consumption, hormone replacement therapy, and menopausal status. Results: The prevalence of hypertension was higher among African Americans than whites. In the lowest quintile of BMI, 41% of African American women and 43% of African American men had hypertension compared with 14% of white women and 19% of white men. Elevated BMI, WHR, waist circumference, and waist/height were associated with increased odds of hypertension in African American and white men and women. In women, but not in men, there were significant interactions between ethnicity and the anthropometric variables studied here. The direction of the interaction indicated larger odds ratios for hypertension with increasing levels of anthropometric indices in white compared with African American women. Discussion: Obesity and abdominal fat preponderance were associated with increased prevalence of hypertension in African American and white men and women. Associations were similar among African American and white men, but obesity and fat patterning were less strongly associated with hypertension in African American than in white women.     

Obesity in the Elderly and Its Relationship with Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Taiwan**

Objectives: The obese elderly are at increased risk of mortality, morbidity, and functional disability. In this study, we examined the prevalence of obesity and relationship between various anthropometric indices (AI) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in the elderly. Research Methods and Procedures: A stratified multistage clustered sampling scheme was used in the Elderly Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan during 1999 to 2000. 2432 non‐institutionalized subjects (age, 72.8 ± 9.4 years; BMI, 23.6 ± 6.4 kg/m²) were recruited. The receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare predictive validity of CVD risk factors among various AI, including BMI, waist circumference (WC), and waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR). Results: The prevalence of obesity was 29.0% in men and 36.8% in women by obesity criteria for Asians (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) and 13.3% in men and 21.0% in women by the Taiwanese definition (BMI ≥ 27 kg/m²). Odds ratios of acquiring various CVD risk factors increased significantly with increment of WC, WHR, and BMI. The areas under the curve predicting metabolic syndrome were all <0.8. The cut‐off values of WC corresponding to the highest sensitivity and the highest specificity in predicting various CVD risk factors were 86.2–88.0 cm in men and 82.0–84.0 cm in women, respectively. Discussion: Obesity was prevalent in the Taiwanese elderly. WC was related to CVD risk factors to a greater extent than BMI and WHR. However, none of them alone was a good screening tool for CVD risk factors. Therefore, how to apply AI prudently to screen elderly for CVD risk factors needs further research.     

Adiponectin and ghrelin levels and body size in normoglycemic Filipino, African-American, and white women

Objective: Prior studies have reported ethnic differences in adiponectin and ghrelin, but few have assessed the role of body size in normoglycemic women. We compared fasting adiponectin and ghrelin concentrations in normoglycemic 40‐ to 80‐year‐old Filipino, African‐American, and white women. Methods: Participants included women from the Rancho Bernardo Study (n = 143), the University of California‐San Diego Filipino Women's Health Study (n = 136), and the Health Assessment Study of African‐American Women (n = 212). A 2‐hour oral glucose tolerance test was administered; glucose, insulin, lipid, and anthropometric measurements were obtained. Fasting adiponectin and ghrelin were measured by radioimmunoassay. Results: Whites and Filipinas had similar BMI (23.7 and 24.3 kg/m², respectively), waist girth (75.6 and 77.2 cm, respectively), and total body fat (27.4 and 28.5%, respectively); African‐Americans had significantly larger BMI (28.8 kg/m²), waist girth (86.3 cm), and body fat (39.6%, p < 0.0001). Adiponectin was lower in Filipinas (8.90 µg/mL) and African‐Americans (9.67 µg/mL) compared with whites (15.6 µg/mL, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR), and waist‐to‐hip ratio. Compared with whites, Filipinas (β = ?5.06, p < 0.0001) and African‐Americans (β = ?6.85, p < 0.0001) had significantly lower adiponectin levels after adjusting for age, waist‐to‐hip ratio, HOMA‐IR, triglycerides, high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, exercise, and alcohol use. Ghrelin was significantly lower in Filipinas compared with African‐Americans (1146.9 vs. 1412.2 pg/mL, p < 0.001), and this observation persisted in multivariable analysis (β = ?245.4, p < 0.0001). Ghrelin levels did not differ between whites (1356.9 pg/mL) and either ethnic group. Discussion: Normoglycemic Filipino and African‐American women had significantly lower adiponectin concentrations than white women, and Filipinas had lower ghrelin levels than African‐Americans, independently of body size or indices of insulin resistance or lipids.     

Central obesity as a risk factor for prostatic hyperplasia

Objective: Obesity‐related metabolic diseases may influence prostatic hyperplasia. This study examined the impact of obesity on prostate volume in men without overt obesity‐related metabolic diseases. Research Methods and Procedures: We recruited 146 men over the age of 40 years who did not have overt obesity‐related diseases, such as diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed on all subjects. The subjects were divided into three groups according to their BMI: normal (18.5 to 22.9 kg/m²), overweight (23 to 24.9 kg/m²), and obese (≥25 kg/m²), and two groups according to their waist circumference: normal waist (≤90 cm) and central obesity (>90 cm). The classification of the subgroups was based on the Asia‐Pacific criteria of obesity. We compared the prostate volume among subgroups and assessed factors related to prostatic hyperplasia. Results: Mean prostate volume was 18.8 ± 5.0, 21.8 ± 7.2, and 21.8 ± 5.6 mL in the normal, overweight, and obese groups, respectively, and was 20.0 ± 5.9 and 23.7 ± 5.3 mL in the normal waist and central obesity group, respectively. Prostate volume was significantly greater in the obese group than in the normal group (P = 0.03) and in the central obesity group compared with the normal waist group (P = 0.002). Prostate volume was positively correlated with BMI and waist circumference after adjustment for age. After adjusting for confounding factors, central obesity was an independent factor affecting prostatic hyperplasia, which was defined as a prostate volume >20 mL (odds ratio = 3.37, p = 0.037). Relative to men with both low BMI (18.5 to 22.9 kg/m²) and normal waist circumference, those with high BMI (≥25 kg/m²) and central obesity were at significantly increased risk of prostatic hyperplasia (odds ratio = 4.88, p = 0.008). However, those with high BMI (≥25 kg/m²) and normal waist circumference were not at significantly increased risk. Discussion: Prostate volume was greater in the obese and central obesity groups than in the normal group after patients with overt obesity‐related metabolic diseases were excluded. Although both BMI and waist circumference were positively correlated with prostate volume, central obesity was the only independent factor affecting prostate hyperplasia. We suggest that central obesity is an important risk factor for prostatic hyperplasia.     

Comparison of Overall Obesity and Body Fat Distribution in Predicting Risk of Mortality

Results of studies comparing overall obesity and abdominal adiposity or body fat distribution with risk of mortality have varied considerably. We compared the relative importance and joint association of overall obesity and body fat distribution in predicting risk of mortality. Participants included 5,799 men and 6,429 women aged 30–102 years enrolled in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey who completed a baseline health examination during 1988–1994. During a 12‐year follow‐up (102,172 person‐years), 1,188 men and 925 women died. In multivariable‐adjusted analyses, waist‐to‐thigh ratio (WTR) in both sexes (P_trend <0.01 for both) and waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR) in women (P_trend 0.001) were positively associated with mortality in middle‐aged adults (30–64 years), while BMI and waist circumference (WC) exhibited U‐ or J‐shaped associations. Risk of mortality increased with a higher WHR and WTR among normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m²) and obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m²) adults. In older adults (65–102 years), a higher BMI in both sexes (P_trend <0.05) and WC in men (P_trend 0.001) were associated with increased survival, while remaining measures of body fat distribution exhibited either no association or an inverse relation with mortality. In conclusion, ratio measures of body fat distribution are strongly and positively associated with mortality and offer additional prognostic information beyond BMI and WC in middle‐aged adults. A higher BMI in both sexes and WC in men were associated with increased survival in older adults, while a higher WHR or WTR either decreased or did not influence risk of death.     

Clinical Profile and Management of Patients With Hypertension and Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease According to BMI

Obesity is associated with numerous risk factors and comorbidities such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. However, numerous studies have reported an obesity paradox; the overweight and obese patients with established cardiovascular disease have better prognosis than those with a BMI <25 kg/m². This study was designed to assess potential differences in the clinical profile and management of hypertensive outpatients with chronic ischemic heart disease in obese and lean patients that could explain these two apparently contradictory points. Overweight and obesity were defined as a BMI 25–29.9 kg/m² and ≥30 kg/m², respectively. Cardiovascular risk factors goals were considered according to European Society of Hypertension‐European Society of Cardiology 2003, National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and American Diabetes Association 2005 guidelines. A sample of 2,024 patients (66.8 ± 10.1 years; 31.7% women) was included. Of these, 0.1% had a BMI <20 kg/m²; 17.1% BMI 20–24.9 kg/m²; 53.7% BMI 25–29.9 kg/m²; 23.7% BMI 30–34.9 kg/m²; 4.3% BMI 35–39.9 kg/m²; and 1.1% BMI ≥40 kg/m². The subgroup of patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m² had a higher proportion of women, diastolic dysfunction, diabetes, dyslipidemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, and heart failure. There was an inverse relationship between risk factors control rates and BMI (all comparisons BMI 20–24.9 kg/m² vs. 25–29.9 kg/m² vs. ≥30 kg/m²): blood pressure (BP) control (51.7% vs. 42.4% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.001); low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) control (35.2% vs. 30.5% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.03) and diabetes control (38.6% vs. 27.6% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.023). In conclusion, in patients with hypertension and chronic ischemic heart disease, as BMI increases, the clinical profile worsens as well as risk factors control rates.     

Obesity and Awareness of Obesity as Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Six Ethnic Groups

Objective: To document BMI and knowledge regarding obesity as a risk factor for breast cancer among subpopulations of African‐, Caribbean‐, and European‐American women and to consider the variables predicting obesity in these diverse groups. Research Methods and Procedures: A stratified cluster‐sampling plan was used to recruit 1364 older women from Brooklyn, NY, during 2000–2002. Two groups were born in the United States (African Americans and European Americans), whereas others were from the English‐speaking Caribbean, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Eastern Europe. Participants provided demographics, height and weight measures, and estimates of the risk obesity posed for breast cancer. Results: Women from all groups were significantly overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m²), although European Americans were lowest, followed by Dominicans and Haitians; African‐American and English‐speaking Caribbean women fell into the obese range, even when background variables were controlled. Knowledge of obesity as a breast cancer risk factor was also poor across groups, but Dominicans and Haitians had the lowest scores on knowledge. Importantly, knowledge was not associated with BMI in the overall sample, even when controlling for demographics and ethnicity, although logistic regressions comparing normal weight women with overweight and obese groupings suggested some knowledge of breast cancer risk in the overweight, but not the obese, group. Discussion: The findings remind health professionals of the need to consider more specific ethnic groupings than has hitherto been the case, as well as consider how ethnic and cultural variables may influence perceptions of obesity and its relation to cancer risk.     

Stigmatized Students: Age,Sex, and Ethnicity Effects in the Stigmatization of Obesity

Objective: To assess the stigmatization of obesity relative to the stigmatization of various disabilities among young men and women. Attitudes across ethnic groups were compared. In addition, these findings were compared with data showing severe stigmatization of obesity among children. Research Methods and Procedures: Participants included 356 university students (56% women; mean age, 20.6 years; mean BMI, 23.3 kg/m²; range, 14.4 to 45.0 kg/m²) who ranked six drawings of same‐sex peers in order of how well they liked each person. The drawings showed adults with obesity, various disabilities, or no disability. These rankings were compared with those obtained through a similar procedure with 458 fifth‐ and sixth‐grade children. Results: Obesity was highly stigmatized relative to physical disabilities. African‐American women liked obese peers more than did African‐American men, white men, or white women [F (1, 216) = 4.02, p < 0.05]. Overweight and obese participants were no less stigmatizing of obesity than normal weight participants. Adults were more accepting than children of their obese peers [t (761) = 9.16, p < 0.001]. Discussion: Although the stigmatization of obesity was high among participants overall, African‐American women seemed to have more positive attitudes toward obesity than did white women, white men, or African‐American men. Participants’ weight did not affect their stigmatization of obesity: obese and overweight adults were as highly stigmatizing of obesity as non‐overweight adults. Such internalized stigmatization could help to explain the low self‐esteem and poor body image among obese young adults. However, adults seemed to have more positive attitudes about obesity than children. An understanding of the factors that limit the stigma of obesity among African‐American women could help efforts to reduce stigma.     

Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in Elderly People in Spain

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of obesity and overweight in the older adult population in Spain by sex, age, and educational level. Research Methods and Procedures: A cross‐sectional study was carried out in 2001 in a sample of 4009 persons representative of the noninstitutionalized population ≥60 years of age. Anthropometric measurements (BMI and waist circumference) were obtained using standardized techniques and equipment. Overweight was considered at a BMI of 25 to 29.9 kg/m² and obesity at a BMI of ≥30 kg/m². Central obesity was considered at a waist circumference of >102 cm in men and >88 cm in women. Results: The mean BMI was 28.2 kg/m² in men and 29.3 kg/m² in women. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in men was 49% and 31.5%, respectively. The corresponding percentages in women were 39.8% and 40.8%. The prevalence of obesity was higher in persons with no education than in those with third level education (i.e., university studies), especially among women (41.8% vs. 17.5%). The prevalence of central obesity was 48.4% in men and 78.4% in women. Differences by educational level were seen in only women, in whom the prevalence of central obesity was 80.9% in those with no education and 59% in those with third‐level education. Discussion: The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the Spanish adult elderly population is very high. Some other populations show similar prevalences, especially in Mediterranean countries. Socioeconomic conditions in Spain during the years these cohorts were born may partly explain the high‐frequency of obesity.     

Total and Central Obesity among Elderly Hispanics and the Association with Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: To report the prevalence of total and central obesity in a representative sample of Puerto Rican and Dominican elders in Massachusetts, to compare them with a neighborhood‐based group of non‐Hispanic white elders, and to examine associations of obesity indices with the presence of type 2 diabetes. Research Methods and Procedures: We examined the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and central obesity in 596 Hispanics of Caribbean origin, ages 60 to 92 years, and 239 non‐Hispanic whites, and tested linear and logistic regression models to determine associations among body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and diabetes. Results: Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) was prevalent among all ethnic groups, ranging from 17% to 29% for Dominican and Puerto Rican men, respectively, and from 29% to 40% for non‐Hispanic white and Dominican women, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. Among Hispanic men and women, diabetes was prevalent across all BMI and WC categories but tended to be greatest among those with BMI of 25 to 29 kg/m² (41% to 43%). In contrast, diabetes was most prevalent in the obese group (36% to 45%) of non‐Hispanic whites. Both BMI and WC were associated with the presence of diabetes, but the coefficients were greater for non‐Hispanic whites than for Hispanics. Discussion: Caribbean Hispanics and non‐Hispanic whites living in the same Massachusetts localities had high prevalences of overweight and obesity. Total and central obesity exerted a differential effect on the presence of diabetes among ethnic groups; for Hispanics, diabetes was prevalent even among non‐obese individuals, whereas for non‐Hispanic white women, the prevalence of diabetes was strongly associated with total and central obesity. Additional research is needed to investigate the factors associated with the differential effect of obesity on the prevalence of type 2 diabetes among Hispanic and non‐Hispanic white elders.     

Mediating Effects of Inflammatory Biomarkers on Insulin Resistance Associated with Obesity

Objective: Obesity is associated with elevated levels of biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction [including C‐reactive protein (CRP), E‐selectin, and intercellular adhesion molecule‐1], as well as insulin resistance (IR) and type 2 diabetes. We tested the hypothesis that these biomarkers mediate associations among obesity, IR, and risk of diabetes. Research Methods and Procedures: We stratified 510 initially non‐diabetic women in the Nurses’ Health Study cohort into four phenotypes above/below median BMI (27 kg/m²) and waist circumference (81 cm): low BMI‐low waist (LBLW; N = 190), low BMI‐high waist (LBHW; N = 74), high BMI‐low waist (HBLW; N = 27), and high BMI‐high waist (HBHW; N = 219). Results: In models assessing associations of weight phenotype with IR [fasting insulin (FI)], adjusted for age and diabetes risk factors, mean FI was higher comparing HBHW women (13.6 μU/mL, p < 0.0001) and LBHW (11.5 μU/mL, p = 0.02) with LBLW women (8.6 μU/mL); HBLW and LBLW women were not significantly different. Differences in FI levels were most strongly attenuated after adjustment for E‐selectin comparing LBHW with LBLW women (11.7 vs. 9.7 μU/mL, p = 0.2). Discussion: In logistic regression models, LBHW predicted diabetes (risk factor‐adjusted relative risk 2.06, 1.05 to 6.40), compared with LBLW, but was no longer significant after adjustment for E‐selectin or CRP. After adjusting for CRP and E‐selectin, only HBHW and E‐selectin were significantly associated with risk of diabetes. In women with central adiposity and low BMI, endothelial dysfunction and inflammation may mediate the relationship among central fat, IR, and incident diabetes.     

Predicting Incident Diabetes in Jamaica: The Role of Anthropometry

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR), and waist‐to‐height ratio (WHTR) in predicting incident diabetes in Jamaica. Research Methods and Procedures: A cohort of 728 nondiabetic adults (290 men and 438 women), ages 25 to 74 years and residents of Spanish Town, Jamaica, were followed for a mean of 4 years. Participants had fasting and 2‐hour postchallenge glucose concentrations measured at baseline and follow‐up. Results: There were 51 cases of incident diabetes (17 men and 34 women). All indices were independent predictors of diabetes, and none was clearly superior. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (95% confidence interval) for BMI was 0.74 (0.59 to 0.88) for men and 0.62 (0.51 to 0.72) for women. For waist circumference, these values were 0.78 (0.65 to 0.91) in men and 0.61 (0.50 to 0.71) in women. Similar results were obtained for WHR and WHTR. “Optimal” cut‐off points for BMI were 24.8 kg/m² (men) and 29.3 kg/m² (women). For waist circumference, these were 88 cm and 84.5 cm for men and women, respectively. Corresponding values for WHR were 0.87 and 0.80 and for WHTR were 0.51 and 0.54, respectively. Discussion: Cut‐off points for waist circumference and WHR were similar to those proposed in developed countries for women but lower in men. Waist circumference could be useful in health promotion as an alternative to BMI.     

Anthropometric markers of obesity and mortality in white and African American adults: The pennington center longitudinal study

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between anthropometric measures of obesity and all‐cause mortality in white and African American men and women.

Design and Methods:

The sample included 14,343 adults 18‐89 years of age. Height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences were measured, and the BMI (kg m^?2), body adiposity index (BAI = ([hip circumference in centimeters]/[height in meters])^1.5 – 18), waist‐to‐height ratio (WHtR) and waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR) were computed. Vital status of the participants was determined from linkage with the National Death Index through 2009. Cox regression was used to assess the association between anthropometry and all‐cause mortality, adjusting for age, sex, year of baseline examination, study code, smoking status, alcohol consumption and physical activity. Hazard ratios (HR) are expressed per standard deviation of each variable.

Results:

A total of 438 deaths occurred during 120,637 person‐years of follow‐up. All anthropometric markers demonstrated significant associations with all‐cause mortality in white subjects. In multivariable‐adjusted models, BMI (HR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.19‐1.50), waist circumference (1.41; 1.25‐1.60), BAI (1.34; 1.17‐1.53), WHtR (1.46; 1.28‐1.65), and WHR (1.40; 1.23‐1.61) all demonstrated significant relationships with mortality in white participants, but not in African Americans. In categorical analyses, there was a significant association between BMI status and mortality in whites but not African Americans. However, the risk associated with elevated waist circumference was similar in whites (1.49; 1.15‐1.94) and African Americans (1.60; 1.06‐2.40).

Conclusion:

In summary, this study has demonstrated race differences in the association between anthropometry and all‐cause mortality.

     

Associations of Aging and Birth Cohort with Body Mass Index in a Biethnic Cohort

Objective: To examine associations of aging and birth cohort with body mass index (BMI) in a biethnic cohort. Research Methods and Procedures: This was a longitudinal closed cohort study of 14, 500 white and African‐American men and women, 45 to 64 years of age, followed for 9 years. Aging was defined as the length of the interval in years between baseline and following visits. Birth cohort was defined by the year in which participants were born. Mixed model analyses were used to examine associations of aging, birth cohort, and BMI in four ethnicity‐gender groups. Results: We found that aging was associated with an increase in BMI in white and African‐American men and women. The associations between aging and BMI were stronger in the younger birth cohorts. Except for white women, younger birth cohort was associated with a higher BMI. After adjusting for aging, birth cohort was associated with an increase in BMI of 0.1 kg/m² [95% confidence interval (95% CI): ?0.1, 0.3] among white women. The corresponding values for African‐American women, white men, and African‐American men are 0.5 kg/m² (95% CI: 0.1, 0.9), 0.6 kg/m² (95% CI: 0.4, 0.8), and 0.6 kg/m² (95% CI: 0.2, 1.0), respectively. Discussion: Our analyses show that, in all except white women, people in this age range who were born later have a higher BMI at the same attained age. In all groups, people who are born later gained more weight as they aged. In general, subjects ages 45 to 64 years gained weight as they aged 9 years.     

Effects of Obesity and Body Fat Distribution on Lipids and Lipoproteins in Nondiabetic American Indians: The Strong Heart Study

Objectives: To examine the relationship between obesity and lipoprotein profiles and compare the effects of total obesity and central adiposity on lipids/lipoproteins in American Indians. Research Methods and Procedures: Participants were 773 nondiabetic American Indian women and 739 men aged 45 to 74 years participating in the Strong Heart Study. Total obesity was estimated using body mass index (BMI). Central obesity was measured as waist circumference. Lipoprotein measures included triglycerides, high‐density lipoprotei in (HDL) cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein AI (apoAI), and apolipoprotein B (apoB). Partial and canonical correlation analyses were used to examine the associations between obesity and lipids/lipoproteins. Results: Women were more obese than men in Arizona (median BMI 32.1 vs. 29.2 kg/m²) and South Dakota and North Dakota (28.3 vs. 28.0 kg/m²), but there was no sex difference in waist circumference. Men had higher apoB and lower apoAI levels than did women. In women, when adjusted for center, gender, and age, BMI was significantly related to HDL cholesterol (r = ?0.24, p < 0.001). There was a significant but weak relation with apoAI (r = ?0.14 p < 0.001). Waist circumference was positively related to triglycerides (r = 0.14 p < 0.001) and negatively related to HDL cholesterol (r = ?0.23, p < 0.001) and apoAI (r = ?0.13, p < 0.001). In men, BMI was positively correlated with triglycerides (r = 0.30, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with HDL cholesterol (r = ?0.35, p < 0.001) and apoAI (r = ?0.23, p < 0.001). Triglycerides increased with waist circumference (r = 0.30, p < 0.001) and HDL cholesterol decreased with waist circumference (r = ?0.36 p < 0.001). In both women and men there was an inverted U‐shaped relationship between obesity and waist with LDL cholesterol and apoB. In canonical correlation analysis, waist circumference received a greater weight (0.86) than did BMI (0.17) in women. However, the canonical weights were similar for waist (0.46) and BMI (0.56) in men. Only HDL cholesterol (?1.02) carried greater weight in women, whereas in men, triglycerides (0.50), and HDL cholesterol (?0.64) carried a large amount of weight. All the correlation coefficients between BMI, waist circumference, and the first canonical variable of lipids/lipoproteins or between the individual lipid/lipoprotein variables and the first canonical variable of obesity were smaller in women than in men. Triglycerides and HDL cholesterol showed clinically meaningful changes with BMI and waist circumference in men. All lipid/lipoprotein changes in women in relation to BMI and waist circumference were minimal. Discussion: The main lipoprotein abnormality related to obesity in American Indians was decreased HDL cholesterol, especially in men. Central adiposity was more associated with abnormal lipid/lipoprotein profiles than general obesity in women; both were equally important in men.