ERCC1多态性与肺癌铂类化疗耐药的关系研究

目的：研究DNA切除修复交叉互补基因1（excision repair cross-complementing gene1,ERCC1）单核苷酸多态性与非小细胞肺癌铂类药物化疗敏感性的关系。方法：应用基因测序方法检测89例以铂类药物为主要化疗方案的非小细胞肺癌患者的ERCC1 Asn118Asn基因型,,比较不同基因型与化疗疗效的关系。结果：89例患者化疗总有效率为29.2%。携带ERCC1 CC基因型、含至少一个变异基因型（TC和TT基因型）患者的有效率分别为38.5%和61.5%（X2=2.151,p=0.142）,基因型在化疗有效组和无效组之间的分布无差异（p〉0.05）。结论：ERCC1Asn118Asn单核苷酸多态性可能与非小细胞肺癌对铂类药物化疗的敏感性无关。     

XRCC1 polymorphisms and differentiated thyroid carcinoma risk: A meta-analysis

The objective of this study is to quantitatively derive a more precise estimation of the association between X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) gene polymorphisms and differentiated thyroid carcinoma risk. A comprehensive literature search of three databases was conducted. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with fixed-effect models and random-effect models when appropriate. Overall, no association of the XRCC1 Arg399Gln, Arg280His, and Arg194Trp polymorphisms with differentiated thyroid carcinoma risk was found. In subgroup analyses, a decreased differentiated thyroid carcinoma risk was observed among Caucasians (Gln vs. Arg, OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77–0.96, P = 0.343 for heterogeneity; Gln/Arg vs. Arg/Arg, OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.71–0.98, P = 0.229 for heterogeneity; Gln/Gln vs. Arg/Arg, OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60–0.99, P = 0.477 for heterogeneity; dominant genetic model, OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71–0.95, P = 0.272 for heterogeneity), not among Asians. No publication bias was observed. Our results suggest that XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is not associated with differentiated thyroid carcinoma risk, while a decreased risk is observed among Caucasian population.     

The Cytochrome P4501A1 gene polymorphisms and idiopathic male infertility risk: A meta-analysis

Studies of the relationship between male infertility and CYP1A1 polymorphisms are inconclusive. To drive a more precise estimation, we performed a meta-analysis based on 1060cases and 1225 controls from 7 published case–control studies. PubMed and CNKI literature search were conducted to identify all eligible studies investigating such a relationship. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association in the additive model, dominant model, recessive model, and allele-frequency genetic model. In the overall analysis, the frequency of CYP1A1*2A genotype was significantly associated with susceptibility to idiopathic male infertility. Further stratified analysis by ethnicity showed notable association between the polymorphism and the risk of idiopathic male infertility in Asians. In conclusion, these results support that the CYP1A1*2A genotype polymorphism mainly contributes to idiopathic male infertility susceptibility in Asians but not in Caucasians.     

Genetic polymorphisms of xeroderma pigmentosum group D gene Asp312Asn and Lys751Gln and susceptibility to prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Many studies have reported the role of xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) with prostate cancer risk, but the results remained controversial. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the association between XPD Asp312Asn and Lys751Gln polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk. A total of 8 studies including 2620 cases and 3225 controls described Asp312Asn genotypes, among which 10 articles involving 3230 cases and 3582 controls described Lys751Gln genotypes and were also involved in this meta-analysis. When all the eligible studies were pooled into this meta-analysis, a significant association between prostate cancer risk and XPD Asp312Asn polymorphism was found. For Asp312Asn polymorphism, in the stratified analysis by ethnicity and source of controls, prostate cancer risk was observed in co-dominant, dominant and recessive models, while no evidence of any associations of XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism with prostate cancer was found in the overall or subgroup analyses. Our meta-analysis supports that the XPD Asp312Asn polymorphism contributed to the risk of prostate cancer from currently available evidence. However, a study with a larger sample size is needed to further evaluate gene–environment interaction on XPD Asp312Asn and Lys751Gln polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk.     

The hMLH1 promoter polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility in Asian populations: A meta-analysis

Background

A variety of studies have evaluated the associations between polymorphisms in the promoter regions of the hMLH1 and cancer risk. However, the results remain inconclusive. To better understand the roles of the hMLH1 polymorphisms and cancer risk, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to investigate the association between the hMLH1 − 93G/A and 1151T/A (Val384Asp) polymorphisms and cancer risk in Asian population.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis by conducting searches of the published studies in Pub Med, CNKI, CBM, ISI web of knowledge and Google scholar search databases. Finally, 12 studies were included into our meta-analysis. Overall and subgroup analyses were performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the associations between hMLH1 polymorphisms and cancer risk. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0.

Results

Twelve studies addressing two hMLH1 polymorphisms were analyzed among a total of 4128 cancer cases and 4678 controls. For hMLH1 − 93G/A, there was no evidence that the hMLH1 − 93G/A polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased cancer risk (P > 0.05) in Asian populations (heterozygote comparison: OR = 0.89 [95% CI (0.75, 1.060)] P = 0.20; dominant model comparison: OR = 0.98 [95% CI (0.83, 1.15)] P = 0.79). In subgroup analysis based on cancer types and the sources of control, no associations were found in colorectal cancer, gastric cancer and “other cancers” under the any gene model except for lung cancer (recessive model comparison: OR = 1.69 [95% CI (1.30, 2.19)] P < 0.0001). For hMLH1 1151T/A, the polymorphism significantly associated with an increased cancer risk in Asians: OR = 1.88 [95% CI (1.49, 2.25)], P < 0.0001, and OR = 1.87 [95% CI (1.49, 2.25)], P < 0.0001.

Conclusions

Our investigations demonstrated that the hMLH1 − 93G/A polymorphism is not a candidate for susceptibility to overall cancers, and that the hMLH1 1151T/A polymorphism is significantly associated with higher cancer risk in Asian populations. Further studies with large sample size for hMLH1 should be conducted.     

No evidence of association between the synonymous polymorphisms in XRCC1 and ERCC2 and breast cancer susceptibility among nonsmoking Chinese

DNA repair proficiency has also been proposed as a potential susceptibility factor for breast cancer. Synonymous polymorphism roles of the DNA repair genes in relation to breast cancer remain largely unknown. Nonsmokers are a good model in which to investigate genetic susceptibility to cancer because they are at low-dose carcinogen exposure. To validate genetic biomarkers of the disease, we explored the effects of the two synonymous polymorphisms [Pro206Pro (rs915927) and Arg156Arg (rs238406)] in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2 at chromosome 19q13.2-3 on breast cancer susceptibility among nonsmoking Chinese. The study recruited 243 patients with breast cancer and 234 cancer-free controls matched to the cases by age (±3years), gender, nonsmoking status and ethnicity. Genotypes were determined using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. No associations were observed between both individual single nucleotide polymorphisms or haplotypes and breast cancer susceptibility. After stratification, no effects were detected for age-dependent effects or menopause status in relation to breast cancer occurrence. No evidence of gene-gene interaction in breast cancer susceptibility was revealed. The two loci were at weak linkage disequilibrium (D' value=0.244, P=0.07). The present data suggest that XRCC1 Pro206Pro and ERCC2 Arg156Arg do not substantially influence breast cancer susceptibility among nonsmoking Chinese.     

Association of ERCC1-C118T and -C8092A polymorphisms with lung cancer risk and survival of advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy: A pooled analysis based on 39 reports

The published data on the predictive role of ERCC1 polymorphisms in lung cancer risk and survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving platinum-based chemotherapy remains inconsistent. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the role of ERCC1 gene polymorphisms (C118T and C8092A) in this clinical situation. Eligible studies were included and assessed for quality using multiple search strategies. Thirty-nine published papers involving 9615 cases (4606 with Stage III/IV disease) and 5542 controls were included in the analysis. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate risk. ERCC1-C118T was associated with lung cancer risk. The OR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81–0.99, p = 0.043) in an additive genetic model (C allele vs. T allele) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63–0.95, p = 0.013) in a recessive genetic model (CC/CT vs. TT). The corresponding risk was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58–0.94, p = 0.013) based on a homozygous comparison (CC vs. TT). No significant correlation was found for ERCC1 C8092A and there was no obvious relationship between ERCC1 C118T/C8092A polymorphisms and objective response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving platinum-based chemotherapy was significantly related to ERCC1 C118T (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07–1.56, p = 0.007, CT/TT vs. CC). There was no relationship between ERCC1 C8092A and survival (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.84–2.10, p = 0.23, CA/AA vs. CC). These findings suggest that ERCC1 C118T polymorphisms may serve as a biomarker for lung cancer risk and have prognostic value in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing platinum-based treatment. Further studies with larger numbers of subjects from a worldwide arena are needed to validate the associations.