Ca2+-independent protein kinase Cs mediate heterologous desensitization of leukocyte chemokine receptors by opioid receptors

Heterologous desensitization of chemokine receptors by opioids has been considered to contribute to their immunosuppressive effects. Previous studies show that Met-enkephalin, an endogenous opioid, down-regulates chemotaxis of selected chemokine receptors via phosphorylation. In the present study, we further investigated the molecular mechanism of such cross-regulation. Our data showed that preincubation with Met-enkephalin inhibited both MIP-1 alpha-mediated chemotaxis and Ca(2+) flux of monocytes in a dose-dependent manner. The inhibitory effects were maximal using nanomolar concentrations of activating chemokines, a concentration found in physiological conditions. A decrease both in chemokine receptor affinity and in coupling efficiency between receptors and G protein were observed, which directly contributed to the desensitization effects. However, comparing with chemokines such as MIP-1 alpha and MCP-1, opioids did not elicit a calcium flux, failed to induce MIP-1 alpha receptors internalization, and mediated a less potent heterologous desensitization. We hypothesized that these differences might originate from the involvement of different protein kinase C (PKC) isotypes. In our studies, opioid-mediated down-regulation of MIP-1 alpha receptors could be blocked by the general PKC inhibitor calphostin C, but not by the calcium-dependent classic PKC inhibitor Go6976. Western blotting analysis and immunofluorescent staining further showed that only calcium-independent PKCs were activated upon opioid stimulation. Thus, opioids achieve desensitization of chemokine receptors via a unique pathway, involving only calcium-independent PKC isotypes.     

Opioid and nociceptin receptors regulate cytokine and cytokine receptor expression

Opioids were originally discovered because of their ability to induce analgesia, but further investigation has shown that the opioids regulate the function of cells involved in the immune response. We suggest that the regulation of cytokine, chemokine, and cytokine receptor expression is a critical component of the immunomodulatory activity of the opioids. In this paper we review the literature dealing with the regulation of cytokine and cytokine receptor expression by agonists for the three major opioid receptor types (mu, kappa, and delta), and nociceptin, the natural agonist for the orphanin FQ/nociceptin receptor. Although the opioid receptors share a high degree of sequence homology, opposing roles between the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) and the mu opioid receptor (MOR) have become apparent. We suggest that activation of the KOR induces an anti-inflammatory response through the down-regulation of cytokine, chemokine and chemokine receptor expression, while activation of the MOR favors a pro-inflammatory response. Investigation into the opioid receptor-like (ORL1)/nociceptin system also suggests a role for this receptor as a down-regulator of immune function. These effects suggest a broad role for opioids in the modulation of the function of the immune system, and suggest possible targets for the development of new therapeutics for inflammatory and infectious diseases.     

Role for the C-terminus in agonist-induced mu opioid receptor phosphorylation and desensitization

Determining which domains and amino acid residues of the mu opioid receptor are phosphorylated is critical for understanding the mechanism of mu opioid receptor phosphorylation. The role of the C-terminus of the receptor was investigated by examining the C-terminally truncated or point-mutated mu opioid receptors in receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. Both wild-type and mutated receptors were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The receptor expression was confirmed by receptor radioligand binding and immunoblottting. After exposure to 5 microM of DAMGO, phosphorylation of the C-terminally truncated receptor and the mutant receptor T394A was reduced to 40 and 10% of that of the wild-type receptor, respectively. Mutation effects on agonist-induced desensitization were studied using adenylyl cyclase inhibition assays. The C-terminally truncated receptor and mutant receptor T394A both showed complete loss of DAMGO-induced desensitization, while the mutant T/S-7A receptor only lost part of its ability to desensitize. Taken together, these results suggest that the C-terminus of the mu opioid receptor participates in receptor phosphorylation and desensitization with threonine 394, a crucial residue for both features. DAMGO-induced mu opioid receptor phosphorylation and desensitization are associated and appear to involve both the mu opioid receptor C-terminus and other domains of the receptor.     

mu-Opioid receptors desensitize less rapidly than delta-opioid receptors due to less efficient activation of arrestin

Receptor desensitization by G-protein receptor kinases (GRK) and arrestins is likely to be an important component underlying the development of tolerance to opioid drugs. Reconstitution of this process in Xenopus oocytes revealed distinct differences in the kinetics of GRK and arrestin regulation of the closely related opioid receptors mu (MOR), delta (DOR), and kappa (KOR). We demonstrated that under identical conditions, GRK and arrestin-dependent desensitization of MOR proceeds dramatically slower than that of DOR. Furthermore, GRK3 phosphorylation sites required for opioid receptor desensitization also greatly differ. The determinants for DOR and KOR desensitization reside in the carboxyl-terminal tail, whereas MOR depends on Thr-180 in the second intracellular loop. Although this later finding might indicate an inefficient phosphorylation of MOR Thr-180, increasing the amount of arrestin expressed greatly increased the rate of MOR desensitization to a rate comparable with that of DOR. Similarly, coexpression of a constitutively active arrestin 2(R169E) with MOR and DOR desensitized both receptors in an agonist-dependent, GRK-independent manner at rates that were indistinguishable. Together, these data suggest that it is the activation of arrestin, rather than its binding, that is the rate-limiting step in MOR desensitization. In addition, mutation of Thr-161 in DOR, homologous to MOR Thr-180, significantly inhibited the faster desensitization of DOR. These results suggest that DOR desensitization involves phosphorylation of both the carboxyl-terminal tail and the second intracellular loop that together leads to a more efficient activation of arrestin and thus faster desensitization.     

The role of mu opioid receptor desensitization and endocytosis in morphine tolerance and dependence

Following activation, most G protein coupled receptors undergo regulation by a cascade of events that promote receptor desensitization and endocytosis. Following endocytosis, receptors can then be recycled to the plasma membrane, retained in an intracellular compartment, or targeted for degradation. For receptors that are recycled, like the mu opioid receptor (MOR), endocytosis serves as the first step toward resensitizing receptors. For receptors that are degraded, endocytosis serves as the first step toward receptor downregulation. Thus, for receptors like the MOR, the desensitization-endocytosis-resensitization cycle serves as a rapid and dynamic means to titrate signaling through the receptor. However, not all agonist ligands at the MOR promote the same degree of receptor desensitization and endocytosis. For example, the endogenous peptide ligands at the MOR induce rapid desensitization, endocytosis, and recycling. By contrast, morphine induces only weak or partial desensitization and little to no endocytosis. As a consequence, signal transduction promoted by morphine is less dynamic than that induced by endogenous ligands as well as other opioid agonists that promote endocytosis. The resulting imbalance of desensitization-endocytosis-resensitization has at least two consequences: (1) in cell types where morphine induces desensitization but not endocytosis and/or resensitization, desensitization is protracted; (2) in cell types where morphine induces neither desensitization nor endocytosis, prolonged signaling through the receptor leads to multiple cellular adaptations downstream of receptor-G protein coupling. Both protracted desensitization and adaptive cellular changes probably contribute to the pronounced in vivo tolerance and dependence that occur with chronic morphine treatment. As a consequence, facilitating receptor endocytosis, using either genetic or pharmacological approaches, can restore the balance of signaling through the receptor and affect the development of tolerance and dependence.     

CXCR2 chemokine receptor antagonism enhances DOP opioid receptor function via allosteric regulation of the CXCR2-DOP receptor heterodimer

Opioid agonists have a broad range of effects on cells of the immune system, including modulation of the inflammatory response, and opioid and chemokine receptors are co-expressed by many white cells. Hetero-oligomerization of the human DOP opioid and chemokine CXCR2 receptors could be detected following their co-expression by each of co-immunoprecipitation, three different resonance energy transfer techniques and the construction of pairs of individually inactive but potentially complementary receptor G-protein alpha subunit fusion proteins. Although DOP receptor agonists and a CXCR2 antagonist had no inherent affinity for the alternative receptor when either receptor was expressed individually, use of cells that expressed a DOP opioid receptor construct constitutively, and in which expression of a CXCR2 receptor construct could be regulated, demonstrated that the CXCR2 antagonist enhanced the function of DOP receptor agonists only in the presence of CXCR2. This effect was observed for both enkephalin- and alkaloid-based opioid agonists, and the effective concentrations of the CXCR2 antagonist reflected CXCR2 receptor occupancy. Entirely equivalent results were obtained in cells in which the native DOP opioid receptor was expressed constitutively and in which expression of the isolated CXCR2 receptor could be induced. These results indicate that a CXCR2 receptor antagonist can enhance the function of agonists at a receptor for which it has no inherent direct affinity by acting as an allosteric regulator of a receptor that is a heterodimer partner for the CXCR2 receptor. These results have novel and important implications for the development and use of small-molecule therapeutics.     

β-Adrenergic receptor-coupled adenylate cyclase

Beta-adrenergic receptor-coupled adenylate cyclase is regulated by both amplification and desensitization processes. Desensitization of adenylate cyclase is divided into two major categories. Homologous desensitization is initiated by phosphorylation of the receptors by a beta-adrenergic receptor kinase. This reaction serves to functionally uncouple the receptors and trigger their sequestration away from the cell surface. These sequestered receptors can rapidly recycle to the cell surface or, with time, become down regulated, being destroyed within the cell. Dephosphorylation of the receptors is accomplished in the sequestered compartment of the cell, which may functionally regenerate the receptors and allow their return to the cell surface. In heterologous desensitization, receptor function is also regulated by phosphorylation, but in the absence of receptor sequestration or down regulation. In this case, phosphorylation serves only to functionally uncouple the receptors, that is, to impair their interactions with the guanine nucleotide regulatory protein Ns. Several protein kinases are capable of promoting this phosphorylation, including the cAMP-dependent kinase and protein kinase C. In addition to the receptor phosphorylation, heterologous desensitization is associated with modifications at the level of the nucleotide regulatory protein Ns and perhaps Ni. Adenylate cyclase systems are also subject to amplification that involves a protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation of the catalytic unit of the enzyme. Phosphorylation of the catalytic unit enhances its catalytic activity and results in amplified stimulation by the regulatory protein Ns. Other receptor/effector systems exhibit qualitatively similar regulatory phenomena, suggesting that covalent modification (phosphorylation) may represent a general mechanism for regulating receptor function.     

趋化因子受体在炎症诱导痛觉中的作用

趋化因子受体最早是在研究白细胞迁移过程中发现的,它在大鼠和小鼠的背根神经节外周感觉神经细胞上也有表达.在炎症情况下,激活的趋化因子受体可以诱导神经细胞上一类重要的镇痛受体—μ-鸦片受体的异源性脱敏,抑制其功能;同时,激活的趋化因子受体还可以增强一类对于痛觉感受非常关键的受体——辣椒素受体的敏感性,使其敏化.趋化因子受体诱导的这2种效应可以通过Gi蛋白信号传导通路增强生物体对痛觉的敏感度.这些结果提示,趋化因子受体可能是免疫系统和神经系统之间交叉调节的桥梁.     

Heterologous desensitization of the human dopamine D1 receptor in Y1 adrenal cells and in a desensitization-resistant Y1 mutant.

In previous studies, mutant clones (designated Y1DR) were isolated that resisted ACTH-induced homologous desensitization of adenylyl cyclase. The Y1DR mutation also conferred resistance to the homologous desensitization induced by agonist stimulation of transfected beta 2-adrenergic receptors. These observations suggested that ACTH and beta 2-adrenergic agonists homologously desensitized adenylyl cyclase in Y1 cells by a common mechanism. In the present study, parental Y1 cells (Y1DS) and the Y1DR mutant were transfected with the gene encoding the human dopamine D1 receptor and examined for regulation of adenylyl cyclase by dopaminergic agonists. Transformants were isolated from both cell lines and shown to respond to dopamine agonists with increases in adenylyl cyclase activity. Treatment of the Y1DS transformants with ACTH promoted a rapid, homologous desensitization of adenylyl cyclase and had little effect on the responses to dopamine or NaF; treatment of Y1DS with dopaminergic agonists promoted a slower rate of heterologous desensitization that diminished responsiveness of the adenylyl cyclase system to dopamine, ACTH, and NaF. Y1DR cells transfected with the dopamine D1 receptor were resistant to the heterologous desensitization of adenylyl cyclase induced by dopaminergic agonists. These latter observations suggest that the pathways of homologous desensitization and heterologous desensitization converge at a common point in the desensitization pathway defined by the DR mutation in Y1 cells.     

C-terminal splice variants of the mouse mu-opioid receptor differ in morphine-induced internalization and receptor resensitization

The main analgesic effects of the opioid alkaloid morphine are mediated by the mu-opioid receptor. In contrast to endogenous opioid peptides, morphine activates the mu-opioid receptor without causing its rapid endocytosis. Recently, three novel C-terminal splice variants (MOR1C, MOR1D, and MOR1E) of the mouse mu-opioid receptor (MOR1) have been identified. In the present study, we show that these receptors differ substantially in their agonist-selective membrane trafficking. MOR1 and MOR1C stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells exhibited phosphorylation, internalization, and down-regulation in the presence of the opioid peptide [d-Ala(2),Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) but not in response to morphine. In contrast, MOR1D and MOR1E exhibited robust phosphorylation, internalization, and down-regulation in response to both DAMGO and morphine. DAMGO elicited a similar desensitization (during an 8-h exposure) and resensitization (during a 50-min drug-free interval) of all four mu-receptor splice variants. After morphine treatment, however, MOR1 and MOR1C showed a faster desensitization and no resensitization as compared with MOR1D and MOR1E. These results strongly reinforce the hypothesis that receptor phosphorylation and internalization are required for opioid receptor reactivation thus counteracting agonist-induced desensitization. Our findings also suggest a mechanism by which cell- and tissue-specific C-terminal splicing of the mu-opioid receptor may significantly modulate the development of tolerance to the various effects of morphine.     

G protein-coupled receptor crosstalk and signaling in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

A variety of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is expressed in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HPCs), including the chemokine receptor CXCR4, the leukotriene receptor CysLT1, the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor S1P1, the cannabinoid receptor CB2, and the complement receptor C3aR. While the role of CXCR4 in stem cell homing is largely established, the function of the other GPCRs expressed in HPCs is only partially understood. CXCR4 and CysLT1 inhibit their own activation after ligand binding (homologous desensitization). Stimulation of S1P1 or C3aR has been shown to activate CXCR4 in HPCs that may sensitize CXCR4-dependent stem cell homing. In contrast, activation of CXCR4 results in a loss of CysLT1 function, which is most likely mediated by protein kinase C (PKC) signaling (heterologous desensitization) and could explain the ineffectiveness of CysLT1 antagonists to mobilize HPCs in vivo. Further characterization of GPCR crosstalk will allow a better understanding of HPC trafficking.     

The absence of a direct correlation between the loss of [D-Ala2, MePhe4,Gly5-ol]Enkephalin inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity and agonist-induced mu-opioid receptor phosphorylation

Chronic activation of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR1TAG) results in the loss of agonist response that has been attributed to desensitization and down-regulation of the receptor. It has been suggested that opioid receptor phosphorylation is the mechanism by which this desensitization and down-regulation occurs. When MOR1TAG was stably expressed in both neuroblastoma neuro2A and human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells, the opioid agonist [D-Ala2,MePhe4, Gly5-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) induced a time- and concentration-dependent phosphorylation of the receptor, in both cell lines, that could be reversed by the antagonist naloxone. Protein kinase C can phosphorylate the receptor, but is not involved in DAMGO-induced MOR1TAG phosphorylation. The rapid rate of receptor phosphorylation, occurring within minutes, did not correlate with the rate of the loss of agonist-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, which occurs in hours. This lack of correlation between receptor phosphorylation and the loss of response was further demonstrated when receptor phosphorylation was increased by either calyculin A or overexpression of the G-protein receptor kinases. Calyculin A increased the magnitude of MOR1TAG phosphorylation without altering the DAMGO-induced loss of the adenylyl cyclase response. Similarly, when mu- and delta-opioid (DOR1TAG) receptors were expressed in the same system, overexpression of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 2 elevated agonist-induced phosphorylation for both receptors. However, in the same cell lines under the same conditions, overexpression of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 2 and beta-arrestin 2 accelerated the rate of DPDPE- but not DAMGO-induced receptor desensitization. Thus, these data show that phosphorylation of MOR1TAG is not an obligatory event for the DAMGO-induced loss in the adenylyl cyclase regulation by the receptor.     

Pharmacological characterization of AR-M1000390 at human delta opioid receptors

We investigated the pharmacological properties of a newly synthesised delta agonist AR-M1000390, derived from SNC-80 ((+)-4-[(alpha R)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethyl-benzamide), in the neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-BE expressing only human delta-opioid receptors. Binding and functional experiments showed a weak affinity (K(i) = 106 +/- 34 nM) correlated with a weak potency (EC(50) = 111 +/- 31 nM) to inhibit the forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. Sustained activation of opioid receptors in the presence of the maximal inhibitory concentration of AR-M1000390 produced a rapid and strong desensitization. In order to examine the contribution of internalization and down-regulation in the desensitization processes, binding and functional experiments were conducted in the presence or in the absence of hypertonic sucrose solution to block clathrin-dependent opioid receptor endocytosis. We observed both the inability of AR-M1000390 to down-regulate opioid receptors and the absence of any effect of sucrose on desensitization. The lack of delta-opioid receptor internalization by AR-M1000390 was further corroborated by confocal microscopy using antibodies directed either against the endogenous delta-opioid receptors or the FLAG-tagged delta-opioid receptors stably expressed in the SK-N-BE cells. These data suggest that uncoupling rather than internalization is responsible for delta-opioid receptors desensitization by AR-M1000390.     

Tracking the opioid receptors on the way of desensitization

Opioid receptors belong to the super family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and are the targets of numerous opioid analgesic drugs. Prolonged use of these drugs results in a reduction of their effectiveness in pain relief also called tolerance, a phenomenon well known by physicians. Opioid receptor desensitization is thought to play a major role in tolerance and a lot of work has been dedicated to elucidate the molecular basis of desensitization. As described for most of GPCRs, opioid receptor desensitization involves their phosphorylation by kinases and their uncoupling from G-proteins realized by arrestins. More recently, opioid receptor trafficking was shown to contribute to desensitization. In this review, our knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of desensitization and recent progress on the role of opioid receptor internalization, recycling or degradation in desensitization will be reported. A better understanding of these regulatory mechanisms would be helpful to develop new analgesic drugs or new strategies for pain treatment by limiting opioid receptor desensitization and tolerance.     

Neurotensin triggers dopamine D2 receptor desensitization through a protein kinase C and beta-arrestin1-dependent mechanism

The peptide neurotensin (NT) is known to exert a potent excitatory effect on the dopaminergic system by inhibiting D2 dopamine (DA) receptor (D2R) function. This regulation is dependent on activation of PKC, a well known effector of the type 1 NT receptor (NTR1). Because PKC phosphorylation of the D2R has recently been shown to induce its internalization, we hypothesized that NT acts to reduce D2R function through heterologous desensitization of the D2R. In the present study, we first used HEK-293 cells to demonstrate that NT induces PKC-dependent D2R internalization. Furthermore, internalization displayed faster kinetics in cells expressing the D2R short isoform, known to act as an autoreceptor in DA neurons, than in cells expressing the long isoform, known to act as a postsynaptic D2R. In patch clamp experiments on cultured DA neurons, overexpression of a mutant D2S lacking three key PKC phosphorylation sites abrogated the ability of NT to reduce D2R-mediated cell firing inhibition. Short interfering RNA-mediated inhibition of β-arrestin1 and dynamin2, proteins important for receptor desensitization, reduced agonist-induced desensitization of D2R function, but only the inhibition of β-arrestin1 reduced the effect of NT on D2R function. Taken together, our data suggest that NT acutely regulates D2 autoreceptor function and DA neuron excitability through PKC-mediated phosphorylation of the D2R, leading to heterologous receptor desensitization.     

Agonist-induced regulation and trafficking of kappa opioid receptors

Chronic or repeated administration of κ opioid agonists leads to tolerance to the subsequent drug administration. The mechanisms underlying tolerance are complex and changes at the receptor level contribute in part to the development of tolerance. This review focuses on agonist-induced phosphorylation, desensitization, internalization and down-regulation of the κ opioid receptor. In vivo studies on the rat and guinea pig brains are reviewed, followed by in vitro investigations on cells and tissues endogenously expressing the κ opioid receptor. The bulk of the article describes the studies performed after cloning of the opioid receptors on regulation and trafficking of the κ opioid receptors (KORs) expressed in various cell systems. Topics reviewed and discussed include biochemical mechanisms of desensitization, internalization and down-regulation, differences in the regulation of the rat and the human κ opioid receptors (rKOR and hKOR, respectively) and the structural basis for the species variations, differential abilities of agonists in inducing regulation of the hKOR, the relationship (or the lack thereof) of KOR internalization to activation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated kinase and to adenylyl cyclase superactivation, the role of the PDZ domain-containing protein NHERF-1/EBP50 in the trafficking of the hKOR and the relationship between receptor phosphorylation and tolerance development in mice. There are still questions remained to be answered. Among the issues to be resolved are the signals that direct the sorting of internalized hKORs to the recycling and degradation pathways, the recycling pathway(s) of the internalized hKOR, the molecular bases of differential regulation of the KORs by agonists and the occurrence of agonist-induced KOR internalization occur in vivo and, if so, its role in tolerance and dependence.     

GRK2 protein-mediated transphosphorylation contributes to loss of function of μ-opioid receptors induced by neuropeptide FF (NPFF2) receptors

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) interacts with specific receptors to modulate opioid functions in the central nervous system. On dissociated neurons and neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y) transfected with NPFF receptors, NPFF acts as a functional antagonist of μ-opioid (MOP) receptors by attenuating the opioid-induced inhibition of calcium conductance. In the SH-SY5Y model, MOP and NPFF(2) receptors have been shown to heteromerize. To understand the molecular mechanism involved in the anti-opioid activity of NPFF, we have investigated the phosphorylation status of the MOP receptor using phospho-specific antibody and mass spectrometry. Similarly to direct opioid receptor stimulation, activation of the NPFF(2) receptor by [D-Tyr-1-(NMe)Phe-3]NPFF (1DMe), an analog of NPFF, induced the phosphorylation of Ser-377 of the human MOP receptor. This heterologous phosphorylation was unaffected by inhibition of second messenger-dependent kinases and, contrarily to homologous phosphorylation, was prevented by inactivation of G(i/o) proteins by pertussis toxin. Using siRNA knockdown we could demonstrate that 1DMe-induced Ser-377 cross-phosphorylation and MOP receptor loss of function were mediated by the G protein receptor kinase GRK2. In addition, mass spectrometric analysis revealed that the phosphorylation pattern of MOP receptors was qualitatively similar after treatment with the MOP agonist Tyr-D-Ala-Gly (NMe)-Phe-Gly-ol (DAMGO) or after treatment with the NPFF agonist 1DMe, but the level of multiple phosphorylation was more intense after DAMGO. Finally, NPFF(2) receptor activation was sufficient to recruit β-arrestin2 to the MOP receptor but not to induce its internalization. These data show that NPFF-induced heterologous desensitization of MOP receptor signaling is mediated by GRK2 and could involve transphosphorylation within the heteromeric receptor complex.     

Agonist-dependent desensitization of the kappa opioid receptor by G protein receptor kinase and beta-arrestin.

We used the Xenopus oocyte expression system to examine the regulation of rat kappa opioid receptor (rKOR) function by G protein receptor kinases (GRKs). kappa agonists increased the conductance of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium channels in oocytes co-expressing KOR with Kir3.1 and Kir3.4. In the absence of added GRK and beta-arrestin 2, desensitization of the kappa agonist-induced potassium current was modest. Co-expression of either GRK3 or GRK5 along with beta-arrestin 2 significantly increased the rate of desensitization, whereas addition of either beta-arrestin 2, GRK3, or GRK5 alone had no effect on the KOR desensitization rate. The desensitization was homologous as co-expressed delta opioid receptor-evoked responses were not affected by KOR desensitization. The rate of GRK3/beta-arrestin 2-dependent desensitization was reduced by truncation of the C-terminal 26 amino acids, KOR(Q355Delta). In contrast, substitution of Ala for Ser within the third intracellular loop [KOR(S255A,S260A, S262A)] did not reduce the desensitization rate. Within the C-terminal region, KOR(S369A) substitution significantly attenuated desensitization, whereas the KOR(T363A) and KOR(S356A,T357A) point mutations did not. These results suggest that co-expression of GRK3 or GRK5 and beta-arrestin 2 produced homologous, agonist-induced desensitization of the kappa opioid receptor by a mechanism requiring the phosphorylation of the serine 369 of rKOR.     

Molecular and cellular mechanisms of the age-dependency of opioid analgesia and tolerance

ABSTRACT: The age-dependency of opioid analgesia and tolerance has been noticed in both clinical observation and laboratory studies. Evidence shows that many molecular and cellular events that play essential roles in opioid analgesia and tolerance are actually age-dependent. For example, the expression and functions of endogenous opioid peptides, multiple types of opioid receptors, G protein subunits that couple to opioid receptors, and regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) change with development and age. Other signaling systems that are critical to opioid tolerance development, such as N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors, also undergo age-related changes. It is plausible that the age-dependent expression and functions of molecules within and related to the opioid signaling pathways, as well as age-dependent cellular activity such as agonist-induced opioid receptor internalization and desensitization, eventually lead to significant age-dependent changes in opioid analgesia and tolerance development.     

Influence of the CCR2-V64I Polymorphism on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Coreceptor Activity and on Chemokine Receptor Function of CCR2b, CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR4

The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 are used by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in conjunction with CD4 to infect cells. In addition, some virus strains can use alternative chemokine receptors, including CCR2b and CCR3, for infection. A polymorphism in CCR2 (CCR2-V64I) is associated with a 2- to 4-year delay in the progression to AIDS. To investigate the mechanism of this protective effect, we studied the expression of CCR2b and CCR2b-V64I, their chemokine and HIV-1 coreceptor activities, and their effects on the expression and receptor activities of the major HIV-1 coreceptors. CCR2b and CCR2b-V64I were expressed at similar levels, and neither molecule affected the expression or coreceptor activity of CCR3, CCR5, or CXCR4 in cotransfected cell lines. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CCR2-V64I heterozygotes had normal levels of CCR2b and CCR5 but slightly reduced levels of CXCR4. CCR2b and CCR2b-V64I functioned equally well as HIV-1 coreceptors, and CCR2-V64I PBMCs were permissive for HIV-1 infection regardless of viral tropism. The MCP-1-induced calcium mobilization mediated by CCR2b signaling was unaffected by the polymorphism, but MCP-1 signaling mediated by either CCR2b- or CCR2-V64I-encoded receptors resulted in heterologous desensitization (i.e., limiting the signal response of other receptors) of both CCR5 and CXCR4. The heterologous desensitization of CCR5 and CXCR4 signaling by both CCR2 allele receptor types provides a mechanistic link that might help explain the in vivo effects of CCR2 gene variants on progression to AIDS as well as the reported antiviral activity of natural CCR2 ligands.