How common are common fragile sites: variation of aphidicolin-induced chromosomal fragile sites in a population of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus)

Aphidicolin (APC)-induced chromosomal gaps and breaks were analyzed for ten deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) from a natural population. The FSM statistical methodology was used to identify fragile sites as chromosomal loci exhibiting significantly non-random numbers of gaps/breaks in each individual and enabled an assessment of variation in fragile sites among the individuals. The individual deer mice exhibited as few as 7 to as many as 19 of the populational total of 34 sites. Two sites were fragile in all individuals and 13 sites were fragile in single individuals only. Defined by populational frequencies of greater than 50%, high-frequency fragile sites constituted 26% of the populational total. Approximately 35% of the total fragile sites were fragile in 20–40% of the population (low-frequency fragile sites) and about 38% were fragile in single individuals only. Analysis of the data pooled over all individuals identified significantly non-random breakage at 80 sites, 47 of which were not identified as fragile in any single individual. It appears, therefore, that fragile site identifications from pooled data have fostered an inflated estimate of the numbers and frequencies of common fragile sites. Comparison of the fragile site and spontaneous breakage (control) data suggest that APC-induced fragile sites represent regions of chromosomes that experience elevated levels of somatic mutation. Additionally, the occurrence of APC-induced fragile sites at or near the interstitial breakpoints of two pericentric-inversion polymorphisms in this population supports the hypothesis that fragile sites experience an increased rate of meiotic chromosomal mutation and are predisposed to undergo phylogenetic rearrangement. Received: 22 January 1997 / Accepted: 24 February 1997     

UV-exposure,endogenous DNA damage,and DNA replication errors shape the spectra of genome changes in human skin

Human skin is continuously exposed to environmental DNA damage leading to the accumulation of somatic mutations over the lifetime of an individual. Mutagenesis in human skin cells can be also caused by endogenous DNA damage and by DNA replication errors. The contributions of these processes to the somatic mutation load in the skin of healthy humans has so far not been accurately assessed because the low numbers of mutations from current sequencing methodologies preclude the distinction between sequencing errors and true somatic genome changes. In this work, we sequenced genomes of single cell-derived clonal lineages obtained from primary skin cells of a large cohort of healthy individuals across a wide range of ages. We report here the range of mutation load and a comprehensive view of the various somatic genome changes that accumulate in skin cells. We demonstrate that UV-induced base substitutions, insertions and deletions are prominent even in sun-shielded skin. In addition, we detect accumulation of mutations due to spontaneous deamination of methylated cytosines as well as insertions and deletions characteristic of DNA replication errors in these cells. The endogenously induced somatic mutations and indels also demonstrate a linear increase with age, while UV-induced mutation load is age-independent. Finally, we show that DNA replication stalling at common fragile sites are potent sources of gross chromosomal rearrangements in human cells. Thus, somatic mutations in skin of healthy individuals reflect the interplay of environmental and endogenous factors in facilitating genome instability and carcinogenesis.     

The role of nucleotides in human fragile site expression

Fragile sites are points on chromosomes which tend to break non-randomly when exposed to specific chemical agents or conditions of tissue culture. There are 3 groups of rare fragile sites, and carriers of these range in incidnece from about 1 in 20 to 1 in several thousand individuals. Rare fragile sites are essentially chromosome variants with no known phenotypic consequence, except for the fragile X which is associated with the commonest inherited form of mental retardation in man. There are also 3 groups of common fragile sites, carried by all or most individuals. These are part of normal chromosomal architecture. Expression of most of the groups of gragile sites is mediated by perturbations of the nucleotide pool and these, as they relate to each group of fragile sites, are discussed. The rare folate-sensitive fragile sites are expressed when thymidylate or deoxycytidine are in limited supply during DNA synthesis. Other rare fragile sites are induced by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). Sets of common fragile sites are induced by BrdU, 5-azacytidine and aphidicolin. Various hypotheses on the molecular nature of fragil sites are considered.     

Evidence that stationary-phase hypermutation in the Escherichia coli chromosome is promoted by recombination

Adaptive (or stationary-phase) mutation is a group of phenomena in which mutations appear to occur more often when selected than when not. They may represent cellular responses to the environment in which the genome is altered to allow survival. The best-characterized assay system and mechanism is reversion of a lac allele on an F' sex plasmid in Escherichia coli, in which the stationary-phase mutability requires homologous recombination functions. A key issue has concerned whether the recombination-dependent mutation mechanism is F' specific or is general. Hypermutation of chromosomal genes occurs in association with adaptive Lac(+) mutation. Here we present evidence that the chromosomal hypermutation is promoted by recombination. Hyperrecombinagenic recD cells show elevated chromosomal hypermutation. Further, recG mutation, which promotes accumulation of recombination intermediates proposed to prime replication and mutation, also stimulates chromosomal hypermutation. The coincident mutations at lac (on the F') and chromosomal genes behave as independent events, whereas coincident mutations at lac and other F-linked sites do not. This implies that transient covalent linkage of F' and chromosomal DNA (Hfr formation) does not underlie chromosomal mutation. The data suggest that recombinational stationary-phase mutation occurs in the bacterial chromosome and thus can be a general strategy for programmed genetic change.     

Chromosomal expression and localization of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in the standard karyotype of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)

The present study reports on the chromosomal expression and localization of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in the standard karyotype of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis, 2n = 50) with the aim of establishing a 'fragile site map' of the species. Totally, 400 aphidicolin-induced breakages were analyzed from eight young and clinically healthy animals, four males and four females; these breakages were localized in 106 RBG-negative chromosome bands or at the band-interband regions. The number of breakages per chromosome did not vary statistically 'among' the animals investigated but the differences among individual chromosomes were highly significant thus indicating that the chromosomal distribution of the breakages is not random and appears only partially related to chromosome length. Fragile sites were statistically determined as those chromosomal bands showing three or more breakages. In the river buffalo karyotype, 51 fragile sites were detected and localized on the standardized ideogram of the species. The most fragile bands were as follows: 9q213 with 24 breakages out of 400; 19q21 with 16, 17q21 and inacXq24 with 15, 15q23 with 13 and 13q23 with 12 breaks, respectively. Previous gene mapping analysis in this species has revealed that the closest loci to these fragile sites contain genes such as RASA1 and CAST (9q214), NPR3 and C9 (19q19), PLP and BTK (Xq24-q25), OarCP09 (15q24), and EDNRB (13q22) whose mutations are responsible for severe phenotypic malformations and immunodeficiency in humans as well as in mice and meat quality in pigs. Further cytogenetic and molecular studies are needed to fully exploit the biological significance of the fragile sites in karyotype evolution of domestic animals and their relationships with productive and reproductive efficiency of livestock.     

Chromosomal instability at common fragile sites in Seckel syndrome

Seckel syndrome (SCKL) is a rare, genetically heterogeneous disorder, with dysmorphic facial appearance, growth retardation, microcephaly, mental retardation, variable chromosomal instability, and hematological disorders. To date, three loci have been linked to this syndrome, and recently, the gene encoding ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) was identified as the gene mutated at the SCKL1 locus. The ATR mutation affects splicing efficiency, resulting in low levels of ATR in affected individuals. Elsewhere, we reported increased instability at common chromosomal fragile sites in cells lacking the replication checkpoint gene ATR. Here, we tested whether cells from patients carrying the SCKL1 mutation would show increased chromosome breakage following replication stress. We found that, compared with controls, there is greater chromosomal instability, particularly at fragile sites, in SCKL1-affected patient cells after treatment with aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerase alpha and other polymerases. The difference in chromosomal instability between control and patient cells increases at higher levels of aphidicolin treatment, suggesting that the low level of ATR present in these patients is not sufficient to respond appropriately to replication stress. This is the first human genetic syndrome associated with increased chromosome instability at fragile sites following replication stress, and these findings may be related to the phenotypic findings in patients with SCKL1.     

Fragile sites,chromosome evolution,and human neoplasia

Summary In a study of the possible relationship between human fragile sites, chromosomal rearrangements related to neoplasia, and chromosome regions involved in evolutionary changes, we have found that 17 fragile sites related to cancer, 15 fragile sites not related to cancer, and 17 non-fragile regions also related to human malignancy correspond or are close to bands involved in rearrangements that have taken place during chromosomal evolution in primates.     

Repair of chromosomal abasic sites in vivo involves at least three different repair pathways

We introduced multiple abasic sites (AP sites) in the chromosome of repair-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli, in vivo, by expressing engineered variants of uracil-DNA glycosylase that remove either thymine or cytosine. After introduction of AP sites, deficiencies in base excision repair (BER) or recombination were associated with strongly enhanced cytotoxicity and elevated mutation frequencies, selected as base substitutions giving rifampicin resistance. In these strains, increased fractions of transversions and untargeted mutations were observed. In a recA mutant, deficient in both recombination and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), multiple AP sites resulted in rapid cell death. Preferential incorporation of dAMP opposite a chromosomal AP site ('A rule') required UmuC. Furthermore, we observed an 'A rule-like' pattern of spontaneous mutations that was also UmuC dependent. The mutation patterns indicate that UmuC is involved in untargeted mutations as well. In a UmuC-deficient background, a preference for dGMP was observed. Spontaneous mutation spectra were generally strongly dependent upon the repair background. In conclusion, BER, recombination and TLS all contribute to the handling of chromosomal AP sites in E.coli in vivo.     

Candidate tumor suppressor genes at FRA7G are coamplified with MET and do not suppress malignancy in a gastric cancer

Common fragile sites predispose to specific chromosomal breakage associated with deletion, amplification, and/or translocation in certain forms of cancer. Chromosomal fragile sites not only are susceptible to DNA instability in cancer cells, but may also be associated with genes that contribute to the neoplastic process. FRA7G is a common fragile site containing the candidate tumor suppressor genes CAV1, CAV2, and TESTIN (TES). The human gastric cancer cell line GTL-16 has an amplification of this genomic region and was used to seek evidence for the suppressor candidacy of one of these genes. Our results demonstrate that CAV1, CAV2, and TESTIN are coamplified with the MET oncogene and overexpressed in GTL-16. Somatic mutation was not detected in the coding regions of these genes, although they were each overexpressed. The results show that CAV1, CAV2, and TESTIN are not tumor suppressor genes in this gastric cancer.     

Fragile and unstable chromosomes in cancer: causes and consequences

Cancer cells commonly exhibit various forms of genetic instability, such as changes in chromosome copy number, translocations and point mutations in particular genes. Although transmissible change seems to be an essential part of the neoplastic process, the extent to which DNA instability is a cause rather than a consequence of cancer is unclear. Chromosomal fragile sites have been proposed to be not only susceptible to DNA instability in cancer cells, but also associated with genes that contribute to the neoplastic process. Mutation at fragile site loci might therefore have a causative role in cancer. Recent studies on one class of human chromosomal fragile sites show that instability at fragile site loci can functionally contribute to tumor cell biology.     

Linkage disequilibrium between the fragile X mutation and two closely linked CA repeats suggests that fragile X chromosomes are derived from a small number of founder chromosomes

In order to investigate the origin of mutations responsible for the fragile X syndrome, two polymorphic CA repeats, one at 10 kb (FRAXAC2) and the other at 150 kb (DXS548) from the mutation target, were analyzed in normal and fragile X chromosomes. Contrary to observations made in myotonic dystrophy, fragile X mutations were not strongly associated with a single allele at the marker loci. However, significant differences in allelic and haplotypic distributions were observed between normal and fragile X chromosomes, indicating that a limited number of primary events may have been at the origin of most present-day fragile X chromosomes in Caucasian populations. We propose a putative scheme with six founder chromosomes from which most of the observed fragile X–linked haplotypes can be derived directly or by a single event at one of the marker loci, either a change of one repeat unit or a recombination between DXS548 and the mutation target. Such founder chromosomes may have carried a number of CGG repeats in an upper-normal range, from which recurrent multistep expansion mutations have arisen.     

DNA instability at chromosomal fragile sites in cancer

Human chromosomal fragile sites are specific genomic regions which exhibit gaps or breaks on metaphase chromosomes following conditions of partial replication stress. Fragile sites often coincide with genes that are frequently rearranged or deleted in human cancers, with over half of cancer-specific translocations containing breakpoints within fragile sites. But until recently, little direct evidence existed linking fragile site breakage to the formation of cancer-causing chromosomal aberrations. Studies have revealed that DNA breakage at fragile sites can induce formation of RET/PTC rearrangements, and deletions within the FHIT gene, resembling those observed in human tumors. These findings demonstrate the important role of fragile sites in cancer development, suggesting that a better understanding of the molecular basis of fragile site instability is crucial to insights in carcinogenesis. It is hypothesized that under conditions of replication stress, stable secondary structures form at fragile sites and stall replication fork progress, ultimately resulting in DNA breaks. A recent study examining an FRA16B fragment confirmed the formation of secondary structure and DNA polymerase stalling within this sequence in vitro, as well as reduced replication efficiency and increased instability in human cells. Polymerase stalling during synthesis of FRA16D has also been demonstrated. The ATR DNA damage checkpoint pathway plays a critical role in maintaining stability at fragile sites. Recent findings have confirmed binding of the ATR protein to three regions of FRA3B under conditions of mild replication stress. This review will discuss recent advances made in understanding the role and mechanism of fragile sites in cancer development.     

Common fragile sites in man and three closely related primate species

The expression of common fragile sites was studied in peripheral lymphocytes of man, gorilla, chimpanzee, and orangutan after induction with aphidicolin, methotrexate, or fluorodeoxyuridine. As far as the chromosomal localization is concerned, it appears that many of these sites have been highly conserved during primate evolution. However, differences were found in the relative expression of certain sites. In all four species, mapping of approximately 500 lesions disclosed the most breakage-prone common fragile sites, at which about 90% of all induced aberrations were localized. Comparison of chromosome regions involved in evolutionary changes to fragile sites in the four primate species revealed 30 sites that were located at or close to the same chromosomal band. However, no correlation was found between the relative expression of a certain common fragile site in vitro and a potential involvement of this chromosomal site in evolutionary changes.     

Founder effect in a Belgian-Dutch fragile X population

For many years, the high prevalence of the fragile X syndrome was thought to be caused by a high mutation frequency. The recent isolation of the FMR1 gene and identification of the most prevalent mutation enable a more precise study of the fragile X mutation. As the vast majority of fragile X patients show amplification of an unstable trinucleotide repeat, DNA studies can now trace back the origin of the fragile X mutation. To date, de novo mutations leading to amplification of the CGG repeat have not yet been detected. Recently, linkage disequilibrium was found in the Australian and US populations between the fragile X mutation and adjacent polymorphic markers, suggesting a founder effect of the fragile X mutation. We present here a molecular study of Belgian and Dutch fragile X families. No de novo mutations could be found in 54 of these families. Moreover, we found significant (P < 0.0001) linkage disequilibrium in 68 unrelated fragile X patients between the fragile X mutation and an adjacent polymorphic microsatellite at DXS548. This suggests that a founder effect of the fragile X mutation also exists in the Belgian and Dutch populations. Both the absence of new mutations and the presence of linkage disequilibrium suggest that a few ancestral mutations are responsible for most of the patients with fragile X syndrome.     

Mutation as a cause of genetic disease

Mutational changes can be conveniently classified into two sorts: those that appear to involve single genes and are generally referred to as gene mutations, and those that involve chromosomal segments containing many genes, or even whole chromosomes, and are referred to as chromosomal mutations. Both of these kinds of mutation occur in germ-cell lineages and contribute substantially to inherited disease, or pre-disposition to disease, and both also occur in somatic cells and contribute to acquired disease. The mutation rates for inherited disease ascribed to mutation in a single gene differ for different genes and are age-dependent. Moreover, a single disease entity, such as haemophilia B, may be the result of any one of a number of different alterations within the gene responsible for the disease. The mutation rate for inherited chromosomal mutation is also age-dependent, particularly so in the case of mutations involving alterations in chromosome number. Studies in experimental animals demonstrate that exposure to physical or chemical mutagens results in increasing the incidence of inherited gene and chromosomal mutations. However, such increases have not been unequivocally demonstrated in human populations exposed to known mutagens. Studies on mutation in human lymphoid or epithelial somatic cells clearly demonstrate an increased frequency in cells taken from people exposed to ionizing radiations or chemical mutagens or in cells exposed in vitro. The consequences of such mutations will depend upon their nature and the origins and functions of the cells in which they occur. Of particular importance are mutations influencing cell growth and proliferation, and both gene and chromosomal mutations are implicated as causal factors in the development of human cancers.     

BRCA1 is required for common-fragile-site stability via its G2/M checkpoint function

Common fragile sites are loci that form chromosome gaps or breaks when DNA synthesis is partially inhibited. Fragile sites are prone to deletions, translocations, and other rearrangements that can cause the inactivation of associated tumor suppressor genes in cancer cells. It was previously shown that ATR is critical to fragile-site stability and that ATR-deficient cells have greatly elevated fragile-site expression (A. M. Casper, P. Nghiem, M. F. Arlt, and T. W. Glover, Cell 111:779-789, 2002). Here we demonstrate that mouse and human cells deficient for BRCA1, due to mutation or knockdown by RNA interference, also have elevated fragile-site expression. We further show that BRCA1 functions in the induction of the G(2)/M checkpoint after aphidicolin-induced replication stalling and that this checkpoint function is involved in fragile-site stability. These data indicate that BRCA1 is important in fragile-site stability and that fragile sites are recognized by the G(2)/M checkpoint pathway, in which BRCA1 plays a key role. Furthermore, they suggest that mutations in BRCA1 or interacting proteins could lead to rearrangements at fragile sites in cancer cells.     

Expression and distribution of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in chronic myeloid leukaemia, acute lymphocytic leukaemia and acute myeloid leukaemia

New information is revealed concerning the frequency of expression and distribution of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in eight leukaemic patients, namely, four chronic myeloid leukaemic patients (CML), three acute lymphocytic leukaemic (ALL) patients, and one acute myeloid leukaemic (AML) patient. The cytogenetic data demonstrate a statistically significant (p less than 10(-6] increase in the frequency of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in seven of the eight leukaemic patients compared with healthy age-matched and sex-matched controls. The chromosomal band locations of the aphidicolin-induced fragile sites from 400 metaphase spreads of these leukaemic patients reveal a nonrandom distribution in the karyotype. Some aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in these leukaemic patients were located at chromosome bands known to be induced specifically by folic acid, distamycin A, bromodeoxyuridine or azacytidine. The cross-induction of fragile sites in the leukaemic patients may be indicative of shared molecular homology in the sequence composition of nonrandom chromosomal DNA.     

Escherichia coli frameshift mutation rate depends on the chromosomal context but not on the GATC content near the mutation site

Different studies have suggested that mutation rate varies at different positions in the genome. In this work we analyzed if the chromosomal context and/or the presence of GATC sites can affect the frameshift mutation rate in the Escherichia coli genome. We show that in a mismatch repair deficient background, a condition where the mutation rate reflects the fidelity of the DNA polymerization process, the frameshift mutation rate could vary up to four times among different chromosomal contexts. Furthermore, the mismatch repair efficiency could vary up to eight times when compared at different chromosomal locations, indicating that detection and/or repair of frameshift events also depends on the chromosomal context. Also, GATC sequences have been proved to be essential for the correct functioning of the E. coli mismatch repair system. Using bacteriophage heteroduplexes molecules it has been shown that GATC influence the mismatch repair efficiency in a distance- and number-dependent manner, being almost nonfunctional when GATC sequences are located at 1 kb or more from the mutation site. Interestingly, we found that in E. coli genomic DNA the mismatch repair system can efficiently function even if the nearest GATC sequence is located more than 2 kb away from the mutation site. The results presented in this work show that even though frameshift mutations can be efficiently generated and/or repaired anywhere in the genome, these processes can be modulated by the chromosomal context that surrounds the mutation site.     

Evolutionary conservation of fragile sites induced by 5-azacytidine and 5-azadeoxycytidine in man,gorilla, and chimpanzee

Summary Lymphocyte cultures from man, gorilla, and chimpanzee were treated with 5-azacytidine and 5-azadeoxycytidine. These cytidine analogues induce common fragile sites in the chromosome bands 1q42 and 19q13 of man. A rare fragile site is induced by 5-azadeoxycytidine in the band 1q24. The optimum conditions required for inducing these new fragile sites were determined by a series of experiments. The common fragile site in human chromosome 1q42 also exists in the gorilla and chimpanzee in the homologous band 1q32. The fragile site in human chromosome 19q13 was demonstrated in the gorilla in the homologous chromosome band 20q13. These are the first examples found of evolutionary highly conserved fragile sites in homologous chromosome bands in related primate species. The interaction between 5-azacytidine, 5-azadeoxycytidine, and chromosomal DNA; the evolutionary conservation of genes located within or closely adjacent to the fragile sites in the chromosome 1 of Hominoidea; and the phylogenetic origin of the two new common fragile sites are discussed.     

Evolutionary conserved chromosomal segments in the human karyotype are bounded by unstable chromosome bands

In this paper an ancestral karyotype for primates, defining for the first time the ancestral chromosome morphology and the banding patterns, is proposed, and the ancestral syntenic chromosomal segments are identified in the human karyotype. The chromosomal bands that are boundaries of ancestral segments are identified. We have analyzed from data published in the literature 35 different primate species from 19 genera, using the order Scandentia, as well as other published mammalian species as out-groups, and propose an ancestral chromosome number of 2n = 54 for primates, which includes the following chromosomal forms: 1(a+c(1)), 1(b+c(2)), 2a, 2b, 3/21, 4, 5, 6, 7a, 7b, 8, 9, 10a, 10b, 11, 12a/22a, 12b/22b, 13, 14/15, 16a, 16b, 17, 18, 19a, 19b, 20 and X and Y. From this analysis, we have been able to point out the human chromosome bands more "prone" to breakage during the evolutionary pathways and/or pathology processes. We have observed that 89.09% of the human chromosome bands, which are boundaries for ancestral chromosome segments, contain common fragile sites and/or intrachromosomal telomeric-like sequences. A more in depth analysis of twelve different human chromosomes has allowed us to determine that 62.16% of the chromosomal bands implicated in inversions and 100% involved in fusions/fissions correspond to fragile sites, intrachromosomal telomeric-like sequences and/or bands significantly affected by X irradiation. In addition, 73% of the bands affected in pathological processes are co-localized in bands where fragile sites, intrachromosomal telomeric-like sequences, bands significantly affected by X irradiation and/or evolutionary chromosomal bands have been described. Our data also support the hypothesis that chromosomal breakages detected in pathological processes are not randomly distributed along the chromosomes, but rather concentrate in those important evolutionary chromosome bands which correspond to fragile sites and/or intrachromosomal telomeric-like sequences.