Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA)-binding Protein C1orf124 Is a Regulator of Translesion Synthesis

DNA damage-induced proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) ubiquitination serves as the key event mediating post-replication repair. Post-replication repair involves either translesion synthesis (TLS) or damage avoidance via template switching. In this study, we have identified and characterized C1orf124 as a regulator of TLS. C1orf124 co-localizes and interacts with unmodified and mono-ubiquitinated PCNA at UV light-induced damage sites, which require the PIP box and UBZ domain of C1orf124. C1orf124 also binds to the AAA-ATPase valosin-containing protein via its SHP domain, and cellular resistance to UV radiation mediated by C1orf124 requires its interactions with valosin-containing protein and PCNA. Interestingly, C1orf124 binds to replicative DNA polymerase POLD3 and PDIP1 under normal conditions but preferentially associates with TLS polymerase η (POLH) upon UV damage. Depletion of C1orf124 compromises PCNA monoubiquitination, RAD18 chromatin association, and RAD18 localization to UV damage sites. Thus, C1orf124 acts at multiple steps in TLS, stabilizes RAD18 and ubiquitinated PCNA at damage sites, and facilitates the switch from replicative to TLS polymerase to bypass DNA lesion.     

RAD18-BRCTx interaction is required for efficient repair of UV-induced DNA damage

BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal (BRCT) motifs are present in a number of proteins involved in DNA repair and/or DNA damage signaling pathways. The BRCT domain-containing protein BRCTx has been shown to interact physically with RAD18, an E3 ligase involved in postreplication repair and homologous recombination repair. However, the physiological relevance of the interaction between RAD18 and BRCTx is largely unknown. In this study, we showed that RAD18 interacts with BRCTx in a phosphorylation-dependent manner and that this interaction, mediated via highly conserved serine residues on the RAD18 C terminus, is required for BRCTx accumulation at DNA damage sites. Furthermore, we uncovered critical roles of the RAD18-BRCTx module in UV-induced DNA damage repair but not PCNA mono-ubiquitination or homologous recombination. Thus, our results suggest that RAD18 has an additional function in the surveillance of the UV-induced DNA damage response signal.     

Dynamic localization of human RAD18 during the cell cycle and a functional connection with DNA double-strand break repair

The ubiquitin ligase RAD18 is involved in different DNA repair processes. Here, we show that in G1 phase, human RAD18 accumulates in a few relatively large spontaneous foci that contain proteins involved in double-strand break (DSB) repair. These foci persist until cells enter S phase, when numerous small foci appear. At these sites, only 20% of RAD18 colocalizes with PCNA, a known RAD18 substrate. In late G2 phase, RAD18 relocates to nucleoli. After UVC irradiation, PCNA accumulates at the damaged site, followed by RAD18, independent of the cell cycle phase. After induction of DSBs, using low-power multi-photon laser, RAD18 accumulated at the DSB sites, but no PCNA accumulation was observed. Our data show that RAD18 accumulates on DSBs independent of the cell cycle phase. DSBs marked by RAD18 and RAD51 are also positive for RPA in G1 phase, and these DSBs persist until S phase. In addition, we show that DSBs generated in G2 phase are not all repaired, and are observed again in the next G1 phase. We conclude that repair of induced and spontaneous DSBs that accumulate RAD18 and RAD51 in G1 phase cells is delayed until S phase.     

RAD18 promotes DNA double-strand break repair during G1 phase through chromatin retention of 53BP1

Recruitment of RAD18 to stalled replication forks facilitates monoubiquitination of PCNA during S-phase, promoting translesion synthesis at sites of UV irradiation-induced DNA damage. In this study, we show that RAD18 is also recruited to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced sites of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) forming foci which are co-localized with 53BP1, NBS1, phosphorylated ATM, BRCA1 and γ-H2AX. RAD18 associates with 53BP1 and is recruited to DSB sites in a 53BP1-dependent manner specifically during G1-phase, RAD18 monoubiquitinates KBD domain of 53BP1 at lysine 1268 in vitro. A monoubiquitination-resistant 53BP1 mutant harboring a substitution at lysine 1268 is not retained efficiently at the chromatin in the vicinity of DSBs. In Rad18-null cells, retention of 53BP1 foci, efficiency of DSB repair and post-irradiation viability are impaired compared with wild-type cells. Taken together, these results suggest that RAD18 promotes 53BP1-directed DSB repair by enhancing retention of 53BP1, possibly through an interaction between RAD18 and 53BP1 and the modification of 53BP1.     

Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 5 Is Required for the Efficient Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

During the DNA damage response (DDR), ubiquitination plays an important role in the recruitment and regulation of repair proteins. However, little is known about elimination of the ubiquitination signal after repair is completed. Here we show that the ubiquitin-specific protease 5 (USP5), a deubiquitinating enzyme, is involved in the elimination of the ubiquitin signal from damaged sites and is required for efficient DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Depletion of USP5 sensitizes cells to DNA damaging agents, produces DSBs, causes delayed disappearance of γH2AX foci after Bleocin treatment, and influences DSB repair efficiency in the homologous recombination pathway but not in the non-homologous end joining pathway. USP5 co-localizes to DSBs induced by laser micro-irradiation in a RAD18-dependent manner. Importantly, polyubiquitin chains at sites of DNA damage remained for longer periods in USP5-depleted cells. Our results show that disassembly of polyubiquitin chains by USP5 at sites of damage is important for efficient DSB repair.     

RAD18 Activates the G2/M Checkpoint through DNA Damage Signaling to Maintain Genome Integrity after Ionizing Radiation Exposure

The ubiquitin ligase RAD18 is involved in post replication repair pathways via its recruitment to stalled replication forks, and its role in the ubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Recently, it has been reported that RAD18 is also recruited to DNA double strand break (DSB) sites, where it plays novel functions in the DNA damage response induced by ionizing radiation (IR). This new role is independent of PCNA ubiquitylation, but little is known about how RAD18 functions after IR exposure. Here, we describe a role for RAD18 in the IR-induced DNA damage signaling pathway at G2/M phase in the cell cycle. Depleting cells of RAD18 reduced the recruitment of the DNA damage signaling factors ATM, γH2AX, and 53BP1 to foci in cells at the G2/M phase after IR exposure, and attenuated activation of the G2/M checkpoint. Furthermore, depletion of RAD18 increased micronuclei formation and cell death following IR exposure, both in vitro and in vivo. Our data suggest that RAD18 can function as a mediator for DNA damage response signals to activate the G2/M checkpoint in order to maintain genome integrity and cell survival after IR exposure.     

DNA Damage Response: Three Levels of DNA Repair Regulation

Genome integrity is challenged by DNA damage from both endogenous and environmental sources. This damage must be repaired to allow both RNA and DNA polymerases to accurately read and duplicate the information in the genome. Multiple repair enzymes scan the DNA for problems, remove the offending damage, and restore the DNA duplex. These repair mechanisms are regulated by DNA damage response kinases including DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR that are activated at DNA lesions. These kinases improve the efficiency of DNA repair by phosphorylating repair proteins to modify their activities, by initiating a complex series of changes in the local chromatin structure near the damage site, and by altering the overall cellular environment to make it more conducive to repair. In this review, we focus on these three levels of regulation to illustrate how the DNA damage kinases promote efficient repair to maintain genome integrity and prevent disease.The DNA in each of our cells accumulates thousands of lesions every day. This damaged DNA must be removed for the DNA code to be read properly. Fortunately, cells contain multiple DNA repair mechanisms including: base excision repair (BER) that removes damaged bases, mismatch repair (MMR) that recognizes base incorporation errors and base damage, nucleotide excision repair (NER) that removes bulky DNA adducts, and cross-link repair (ICL) that removes interstrand cross-links. In addition, breaks in the DNA backbone are repaired via double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways including homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Some of these mechanisms can operate independently to repair simple lesions. However, the repair of more complex lesions involving multiple DNA processing steps is regulated by the DNA damage response (DDR). For the most difficult to repair lesions, the DDR can be essential for successful repair.The DDR consists of multiple pathways, but for the purposes of this review we will focus on the DDR kinase signaling cascades controlled by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKK). These kinases include DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs), ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), and ATM and Rad3-related (ATR). DNA-PKcs and ATM are primarily involved in DSB repair, whereas ATR responds to a wide range of DNA lesions, especially those associated with DNA replication (Cimprich and Cortez 2008). ATR’s versatility makes it essential for the viability of replicating cells in mice and humans (Brown and Baltimore 2000; de Klein et al. 2000; Cortez et al. 2001). In the case of ATM, inherited biallelic mutations cause ataxia-telangiectasia—a disorder characterized by neurodegeneration, immunodeficiency, and cancer (Shiloh 2003; Lavin 2008). ATM mutations are also frequently found in several types of tumors (Negrini et al. 2010).The DDR kinases share several common regulatory mechanisms of activation (Lovejoy and Cortez 2009). All three DDR kinases sense damage through protein–protein interactions that serve to recruit the kinases to damage sites. Once localized, posttranslational modifications and other protein–protein interactions fully activate the kinases to initate a cascade of phosphorylation events. The best-studied substrate of DNA-PKcs is actually DNA-PKcs itself, and autophosphorylation is an important step in direct religation of the DSB via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) (Weterings and Chen 2007; Dobbs et al. 2010). ATM and ATR have both unique and shared substrates that participate in DNA repair, checkpoint signaling, and determining cell fate decisions such as apoptosis and sensescence.     

SIVA1 directs the E3 ubiquitin ligase RAD18 for PCNA monoubiquitination

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) is a universal DNA damage tolerance mechanism conserved from yeast to mammals. A key event in the regulation of TLS is the monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Extensive evidence indicates that the RAD6–RAD18 ubiquitin-conjugating/ligase complex specifically monoubiquitinates PCNA and regulates TLS repair. However, the mechanism by which the RAD6–RAD18 complex is targeted to PCNA has remained elusive. In this study, we used an affinity purification approach to isolate the PCNA-containing complex and have identified SIVA1 as a critical regulator of PCNA monoubiquitination. We show that SIVA1 constitutively interacts with PCNA via a highly conserved PCNA-interacting peptide motif. Knockdown of SIVA1 compromised RAD18-dependent PCNA monoubiquitination and Polη focus formation, leading to elevated ultraviolet sensitivity and mutation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SIVA1 interacts with RAD18 and serves as a molecular bridge between RAD18 and PCNA, thus targeting the E3 ligase activity of RAD18 onto PCNA. Collectively, our results provide evidence that the RAD18 E3 ligase requires an accessory protein for binding to its substrate PCNA.     

RAD18 lives a double life: Its implication in DNA double-strand break repair

Maintenance of genome stability depends on efficient and accurate repair of DNA lesions. Failure to properly repair damaged DNA can cause cell death, mutations and chromosomal instability, which eventually lead to tumorigenesis. The E3 ligase RAD18 is well-known for its function in DNA damage bypass and post-replication repair (PRR) in yeast and vertebrates via its ability to facilitate PCNA mono-ubiquitination at stalled replication forks. However, emerging evidence has also indicated that RAD18 plays an important role in homologous recombination (HR) in mammalian cells, which is an error-free DNA repair pathway that mediates the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we review how RAD18 carries out these distinct functions in response to different types of DNA lesions.     

DNA damage-induced ubiquitylation of RFC2 subunit of replication factor C complex

Many proteins involved in DNA replication and repair undergo post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation and ubiquitylation. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; a homotrimeric protein that encircles double-stranded DNA to function as a sliding clamp for DNA polymerases) is monoubiquitylated by the RAD6-RAD18 complex and further polyubiquitylated by the RAD5-MMS2-UBC13 complex in response to various DNA-damaging agents. PCNA mono- and polyubiquitylation activate an error-prone translesion synthesis pathway and an error-free pathway of damage avoidance, respectively. Here we show that replication factor C (RFC; a heteropentameric protein complex that loads PCNA onto DNA) was also ubiquitylated in a RAD18-dependent manner in cells treated with alkylating agents or H(2)O(2). A mutant form of RFC2 with a D228A substitution (corresponding to a yeast Rfc4 mutation that reduces an interaction with replication protein A (RPA), a single-stranded DNA-binding protein) was heavily ubiquitylated in cells even in the absence of DNA damage. Furthermore RFC2 was ubiquitylated by the RAD6-RAD18 complex in vitro, and its modification was inhibited in the presence of RPA. The inhibitory effect of RPA on RFC2 ubiquitylation was relatively specific because RAD6-RAD18-mediated ubiquitylation of PCNA was RPA-insensitive. Our findings suggest that RPA plays a regulatory role in DNA damage responses via repression of RFC2 ubiquitylation in human cells.     

HP1alpha recruitment to DNA damage by p150CAF-1 promotes homologous recombination repair

Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), a major component of constitutive heterochromatin, is recruited to DNA damage sites. However, the mechanism involved in this recruitment and its functional importance during DNA repair remain major unresolved issues. Here, by characterizing HP1α dynamics at laser-induced damage sites in mammalian cells, we show that the de novo accumulation of HP1α occurs within both euchromatin and heterochromatin as a rapid and transient event after DNA damage. This recruitment is strictly dependent on p150CAF-1, the largest subunit of chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1), and its ability to interact with HP1α. We find that HP1α depletion severely compromises the recruitment of the DNA damage response (DDR) proteins 53BP1 and RAD51. Moreover, HP1α depletion leads to defects in homologous recombination-mediated repair and reduces cell survival after DNA damage. Collectively, our data reveal that HP1α recruitment at early stages of the DDR involves p150CAF-1 and is critical for proper DNA damage signaling and repair.     

NEDDylation antagonizes ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and regulates the recruitment of polymerase η in response to oxidative DNA damage

NEDDylation has been shown to participate in the DNA damage pathway, but the substrates of neural precursor cell expressed developmentally downregulated 8 (NEDD8) and the roles of NEDDylation involved in the DNA damage response (DDR) are largely unknown. Translesion synthesis (TLS) is a damage-tolerance mechanism, in which RAD18/RAD6-mediated monoubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) promotes recruitment of polymerase η (polη) to bypass lesions. Here we identify PCNA as a substrate of NEDD8, and show that E3 ligase RAD18-catalyzed PCNA NEDDylation antagonizes its ubiquitination. In addition, NEDP1 acts as the deNEDDylase of PCNA, and NEDP1 deletion enhances PCNA NEDDylation but reduces its ubiquitination. In response to H₂O₂ stimulation, NEDP1 disassociates from PCNA and RAD18-dependent PCNA NEDDylation increases markedly after its ubiquitination. Impairment of NEDDylation by Ubc12 knockout enhances PCNA ubiquitination and promotes PCNA-polη interaction, while up-regulation of NEDDylation by NEDD8 overexpression or NEDP1 deletion reduces the excessive accumulation of ubiquitinated PCNA, thus inhibits PCNA-polη interaction and blocks polη foci formation. Moreover, Ubc12 knockout decreases cell sensitivity to H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress, but NEDP1 deletion aggravates this sensitivity. Collectively, our study elucidates the important role of NEDDylation in the DDR as a modulator of PCNA monoubiquitination and polη recruitment.     

DNA Damage to a Single Chromosome End Delays Anaphase Onset

Chromosome ends contain nucleoprotein structures known as telomeres. Damage to chromosome ends during interphase elicits a DNA damage response (DDR) resulting in cell cycle arrest. However, little is known regarding the signaling from damaged chromosome ends (designated here as “TIPs”) during mitosis. In the present study, we investigated the consequences of DNA damage induced at a single TIP in mitosis. We used laser microirradiation to damage mitotic TIPs or chromosome arms (non-TIPs) in PtK2 kidney epithelial cells. We found that damage to a single TIP, but not a non-TIP, delays anaphase onset. This TIP-specific checkpoint response is accompanied by differential recruitment of DDR proteins. Although phosphorylation of H2AX and the recruitment of several repair factors, such as Ku70-Ku80, occur in a comparable manner at both TIP and non-TIP damage sites, DDR factors such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), MDC1, WRN, and FANCD2 are specifically recruited to TIPs but not to non-TIPs. In addition, Nbs1, BRCA1, and ubiquitin accumulate at damaged TIPs more rapidly than at damaged non-TIPs. ATR and 53BP1 are not detected at either TIPs or non-TIPs in mitosis. The observed delay in anaphase onset is dependent on the activity of DDR kinases ATM and Chk1, and the spindle assembly checkpoint kinase Mps1. Cells damaged at a single TIP or non-TIP eventually exit mitosis with unrepaired lesions. Damaged TIPs are segregated into micronuclei at a significantly higher frequency than damaged non-TIPs. Together, these findings reveal a mitosis-specific DDR uniquely associated with chromosome ends.     

TET3‐mediated DNA oxidation promotes ATR‐dependent DNA damage response

An efficient, accurate, and timely DNA damage response (DDR) is crucial for the maintenance of genome integrity. Here, we report that ten‐eleven translocation dioxygenase (TET) 3‐mediated conversion of 5‐methylcytosine (5mC) to 5‐hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) in response to ATR‐dependent DDR regulates DNA repair. ATR‐dependent DDR leads to dynamic changes in 5hmC levels and TET3 enzymatic activity. We show that TET3 is an ATR kinase target that oxidizes DNA during ATR‐dependent DNA damage repair. Modulation of TET3 expression and activity affects DNA damage signaling and DNA repair and consequently cell death. Our results provide novel insight into ATR‐mediated DDR, in which TET3‐mediated DNA demethylation is crucial for efficient DNA repair and maintenance of genome stability.     

The importance of XRCC2 in RAD51-related DNA damage repair

The repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination (HR) is a key pathway for the maintenance of genetic stability in mammalian cells, especially during and following DNA replication. The central HR protein is RAD51, which ensures high fidelity DNA repair by facilitating strand exchange between damaged and undamaged homologous DNA segments. Several RAD51-like proteins, including XRCC2, appear to help with this process, but their roles are not well understood. Here we show that XRCC2 is highly conserved and that most substantial truncations of the protein destroy its ability to function. XRCC2 and its partner protein RAD51L3 are found to interact with RAD51 in the 2-hybrid system, and XRCC2 is shown to be important but not essential for the accumulation of RAD51 at the sites of DNA damage. We visualize the localization of XRCC2 protein at the same sites of DNA damage for the first time using specialized irradiation conditions. Our data indicate that an important function of XRCC2 is to enhance the activity of RAD51, so that the loss of XRCC2 results in a severe delay in the early response of RAD51 to DNA damage.     

NBS1 recruits RAD18 via a RAD6-like domain and regulates Pol η-dependent translesion DNA synthesis

Translesion DNA synthesis, a process orchestrated by monoubiquitinated PCNA, is critical for DNA damage tolerance. While the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme RAD6 and ubiquitin ligase RAD18 are known to monoubiquitinate PCNA, how they are regulated by DNA damage is not fully understood. We show that NBS1 (mutated in Nijmegen breakage syndrome) binds to RAD18 after UV irradiation and mediates the recruitment of RAD18 to sites of DNA damage. Disruption of NBS1 abolished RAD18-dependent PCNA ubiquitination and Polη focus formation, leading to elevated UV sensitivity and mutation. Unexpectedly, the RAD18-interacting domain of NBS1, which was mapped to its C terminus, shares structural and functional similarity with the RAD18-interacting domain of RAD6. These domains of NBS1 and RAD6 allow the two proteins to interact with RAD18 homodimers simultaneously and are crucial for Polη-dependent UV tolerance. Thus, in addition to chromosomal break repair, NBS1 plays a key role in translesion DNA synthesis.     

A novel role for Greatwall kinase in recovery from DNA damage

Activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) is critical for genomic integrity and tumor suppression. The occurrence of DNA damage quickly evokes the DDR through ATM/ATR-dependent signal transduction, which promotes DNA repair and activates the checkpoint to halt cell cycle progression. The shut off process of the DDR upon satisfaction of DNA repair, also known as “checkpoint recovery,” involves deactivation of DDR elements, but the mechanism is poorly understood. Greatwall kinase (Gwl) has been identified as a key element in the G₂/M transition and helps maintain M phase through inhibition of PP2A/B55δ, the principal phosphatase for Cdk-phosphorylated substrates. Here, we show that Gwl also promotes recovery from DNA damage and is itself directly inhibited by the DNA damage response (DDR). In Xenopus egg extracts, immunodepletion of Gwl increased the DDR to damaged DNA, whereas addition of wild-type, but not kinase-dead Gwl, inhibited the DDR. The removal of damaged DNA from egg extracts leads to recovery from checkpoint arrest and entry into mitosis, a process impaired by Gwl depletion and enhanced by Gwl overexpression. Moreover, activation of Cdk1 after the removal of damaged DNA is regulated by Gwl. Collectively, these results defines Gwl as a new regulator of the DDR, which plays an important role in recovery from DNA damage.Key words: Greatwall,; DNA damage; checkpoint recovery     

MRE11 complex links RECQ5 helicase to sites of DNA damage

RECQ5 DNA helicase suppresses homologous recombination (HR) possibly through disruption of RAD51 filaments. Here, we show that RECQ5 is constitutively associated with the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex, a primary sensor of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that promotes DSB repair and regulates DNA damage signaling via activation of the ATM kinase. Experiments with purified proteins indicated that RECQ5 interacts with the MRN complex through both MRE11 and NBS1. Functional assays revealed that RECQ5 specifically inhibited the 3′→5′ exonuclease activity of MRE11, while MRN had no effect on the helicase activity of RECQ5. At the cellular level, we observed that the MRN complex was required for the recruitment of RECQ5 to sites of DNA damage. Accumulation of RECQ5 at DSBs was neither dependent on MDC1 that mediates binding of MRN to DSB-flanking chromatin nor on CtIP that acts in conjunction with MRN to promote resection of DSBs for repair by HR. Collectively, these data suggest that the MRN complex recruits RECQ5 to sites of DNA damage to regulate DNA repair.     

Dynamics of some postreplication DNA repair proteins in carcinogen-damaged mammalian cells

Many types of DNA lesions in template strands block DNA replication and lead to a stalling of replication forks. This block can be overcome (bypassed) by special DNA polymerases (for example, DNA polymerase eta, Pol eta) that perform translesion synthesis on damaged template DNA. The phenomenon of completing DNA replication, while DNA lesions remain in the template strands, has been named post-replication repair (PRR). In yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, PRR includes mutagenic and error-free pathways under the regulation of the RAD6/RAD18 complex, which induces ubiquitylation of PCNA. In mammalian cells, Pol eta accumulates in replication foci but the mechanism of this accumulation is not known. Pol eta possesses a conserved PCNA binding motif at the C terminal and phosphorylation of this motif might be essential for its interaction with PCNA. We have shown previously that staurosporine, an inhibitor of protein kinases, inhibits PRR in human cells. In this study we examined whether the accumulation of Pol eta in replication foci after DNA damage is dependent on phosphorylation of the PCNA binding motif. We also studied DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of GFP-tagged human Rad18 (hRad18) and its accumulation in replication foci. Our data indicate that (1) Pol eta is not phosphorylated in response to UV irradiation or MMS treatment, but its diffusional mobility is slightly decreased, and (2) hRad18 accumulates in MMS-treated cells, and considerable amount of the protein co-localizes with detergent insoluble PCNA in replication foci; these responses are sensitive to staurosporine. Our data suggest that hRad18 phosphorylation is the staurosporine-sensitive PRR step.