The RIG-I-like Receptor LGP2 Recognizes the Termini of Double-stranded RNA

The RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), RIG-I and MDA5, recognize single-stranded RNA with 5′ triphosphates and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to initiate innate antiviral immune responses. LGP2, a homolog of RIG-I and MDA5 that lacks signaling capability, regulates the signaling of the RLRs. To establish the structural basis of dsRNA recognition by the RLRs, we have determined the 2.0-Å resolution crystal structure of human LGP2 C-terminal domain bound to an 8-bp dsRNA. Two LGP2 C-terminal domain molecules bind to the termini of dsRNA with minimal contacts between the protein molecules. Gel filtration chromatography and analytical ultracentrifugation demonstrated that LGP2 binds blunt-ended dsRNA of different lengths, forming complexes with 2:1 stoichiometry. dsRNA with protruding termini bind LGP2 and RIG-I weakly and do not stimulate the activation of RIG-I efficiently in cells. Surprisingly, full-length LGP2 containing mutations that abolish dsRNA binding retained the ability to inhibit RIG-I signaling.The innate immune response is the first line of defense against invading pathogens; it is the ubiquitous system of defense against microbial infections (1). Toll-like receptors (TLRs)³ and RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene 1)-like receptors (RLRs) play key roles in innate immune response toward viral infection (2-5). Toll-like receptors TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8 sense viral RNA released in the endosome following phagocytosis of the pathogens (6). RIG-I-like receptors RIG-I and MDA5 detect viral RNA from replicating viruses in infected cells (3, 7, 8). Stimulation of these receptors leads to the induction of type I interferons (IFNs) and other proinflammatory cytokines, conferring antiviral activity to the host cells and activating the acquired immune responses (4, 9).RIG-I discriminates between viral and host RNA through specific recognition of the uncapped 5′-triphosphate of single-stranded RNA (5′ ppp ssRNA) generated by viral RNA polymerases (10, 11). In addition, RIG-I also recognizes double-stranded RNA generated during RNA virus replication (7, 12). Transfection of cells with synthetic double-stranded RNA stimulates the activation of RIG-I (13, 14). Synthetic dsRNA mimics, such as polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly(I·C)), can activate MDA5 when introduced into the cytoplasm of cells. Digestion of poly(I·C) with RNase III transforms poly(I·C) from a ligand for MDA5 into a ligand for RIG-I, suggesting that MDA5 recognizes long dsRNA, whereas RIG-I recognizes short dsRNA (15). Studies of RIG-I and MDA5 knock-out mice confirmed the essential roles of these receptors in antiviral immune responses and demonstrated that they sense different sets of RNA viruses (12, 16).RIG-I and MDA5 contain two caspase recruiting domains (CARDs) at their N termini, a DEX(D/H) box RNA helicase domain, and a C-terminal regulatory or repressor domain (CTD). The helicase domain and the CTD are responsible for viral RNA binding, whereas the CARDs are required for signaling (3, 8). The current model of RIG-I activation suggests that under resting conditions RIG-I is in a suppressed conformation, and viral RNA binding triggers a conformation change that leads to the exposure of the CARDs for the recruitment of the downstream protein IPS-1 (also known as MAVS, Cardif, or VISA) (14, 17). Limited proteolysis of the RIG-I·dsRNA complex showed that RIG-I residues 792-925 of the CTD are involved in dsRNA and 5′ ppp ssRNA binding (14). The CTD of RIG-I overlaps with the C terminus of the previously identified repressor domain (18). The structures of RIG-I and LGP2 (laboratory of genetics and physiology 2) CTD in isolation have been determined by x-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy (14, 19, 20). A large, positively charged surface on RIG-I recognizes the 5′ triphosphate group of viral ssRNA (14, 19). RNA binding studies by titrating RIG-I CTD with dsRNA and 5′ ppp ssRNA suggested that overlapping sets of residues on this charged surface are involved in RNA binding (14). Mutagenesis of several positively charged residues on this surface either reduces or disrupts RNA binding by RIG-I, and these mutations also affect the induction of IFN-β in vivo (14, 19). However, the exact nature of how the RLRs recognize viral RNA and how RNA binding activates these receptors remains to be established.LGP2 is a homolog of RIG-I and MDA5 that lacks the CARDs and thus has no signaling capability (21, 22). The expression of LGP2 is inducible by dsRNA or IFN treatment as well as virus infection (21). Overexpression of LGP2 inhibits Sendai virus and Newcastle disease virus signaling (21). When coexpressed with RIG-I, LGP2 can inhibit RIG-I signaling through the interaction of its CTD with the CARD and the helicase domain of RIG-I (18). LGP2 could suppress RIG-I signaling by three possible ways (23): 1) binding RNA with high affinity, thereby sequestering RNA ligands from RIG-I; 2) interacting directly with RIG-I to block the assembly of the signaling complex; and 3) competing with IKKi (IκB kinase ε) in the NF-κB signaling pathway for a common binding site on IPS-1. To elucidate the structural basis of dsRNA recognition by the RLRs, we have crystallized human LGP2 CTD (residues 541-678) bound to an 8-bp double-stranded RNA and determined the structure of the complex at 2.0 Å resolution. The structure revealed that LGP2 CTD binds to the termini of dsRNA. Mutagenesis and functional studies showed that dsRNA binding is likely not required for the inhibition of RIG-I signaling by LGP2.     

The Cytoskeletal Protein ��-Actinin Regulates Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a through a C-terminal Interaction

The acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) is widely expressed in central and peripheral neurons where it generates transient cation currents when extracellular pH falls. ASIC1a confers pH-dependent modulation on postsynaptic dendritic spines and has critical effects in neurological diseases associated with a reduced pH. However, knowledge of the proteins that interact with ASIC1a and influence its function is limited. Here, we show that α-actinin, which links membrane proteins to the actin cytoskeleton, associates with ASIC1a in brain and in cultured cells. The interaction depended on an α-actinin-binding site in the ASIC1a C terminus that was specific for ASIC1a versus other ASICs and for α-actinin-1 and -4. Co-expressing α-actinin-4 altered ASIC1a current density, pH sensitivity, desensitization rate, and recovery from desensitization. Moreover, reducing α-actinin expression altered acid-activated currents in hippocampal neurons. These findings suggest that α-actinins may link ASIC1a to a macromolecular complex in the postsynaptic membrane where it regulates ASIC1a activity.Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs)² are H⁺-gated members of the DEG/ENaC family (1–3). Members of this family contain cytosolic N and C termini, two transmembrane domains, and a large cysteine-rich extracellular domain. ASIC subunits combine as homo- or heterotrimers to form cation channels that are widely expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems (1–4). In mammals, four genes encode ASICs, and two subunits, ASIC1 and ASIC2, have two splice forms, a and b. Central nervous system neurons express ASIC1a, ASIC2a, and ASIC2b (5–7). Homomeric ASIC1a channels are activated when extracellular pH drops below 7.2, and half-maximal activation occurs at pH 6.5–6.8 (8–10). These channels desensitize in the continued presence of a low extracellular pH, and they can conduct Ca²⁺ (9, 11–13). ASIC1a is required for acid-evoked currents in central nervous system neurons; disrupting the gene encoding ASIC1a eliminates H⁺-gated currents unless extracellular pH is reduced below pH 5.0 (5, 7).Previous studies found ASIC1a enriched in synaptosomal membrane fractions and present in dendritic spines, the site of excitatory synapses (5, 14, 15). Consistent with this localization, ASIC1a null mice manifested deficits in hippocampal long term potentiation, learning, and memory, which suggested that ASIC1a is required for normal synaptic plasticity (5, 16). ASICs might be activated during neurotransmission when synaptic vesicles empty their acidic contents into the synaptic cleft or when neuronal activity lowers extracellular pH (17–19). Ion channels, including those at the synapse often interact with multiple proteins in a macromolecular complex that incorporates regulators of their function (20, 21). For ASIC1a, only a few interacting proteins have been identified. Earlier work indicated that ASIC1a interacts with another postsynaptic scaffolding protein, PICK1 (15, 22, 23). ASIC1a also has been reported to interact with annexin II light chain p11 through its cytosolic N terminus to increase cell surface expression (24) and with Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II to phosphorylate the channel (25). However, whether ASIC1a interacts with additional proteins and with the cytoskeleton remain unknown. Moreover, it is not known whether such interactions alter ASIC1a function.In analyzing the ASIC1a amino acid sequence, we identified cytosolic residues that might bind α-actinins. α-Actinins cluster membrane proteins and signaling molecules into macromolecular complexes and link membrane proteins to the actincytoskeleton (for review, Ref. 26). Four genes encode α-actinin-1, -2, -3, and -4 isoforms. α-Actinins contain an N-terminal head domain that binds F-actin, a C-terminal region containing two EF-hand motifs, and a central rod domain containing four spectrin-like motifs (26–28). The C-terminal portion of the rod segment appears to be crucial for binding to membrane proteins. The α-actinins assemble into antiparallel homodimers through interactions in their rod domain. α-Actinins-1, -2, and -4 are enriched in dendritic spines, concentrating at the postsynaptic membrane (29–35). In the postsynaptic membrane of excitatory synapses, α-actinin connects the NMDA receptor to the actin cytoskeleton, and this interaction is key for Ca²⁺-dependent inhibition of NMDA receptors (36–38). α-Actinins can also regulate the membrane trafficking and function of several cation channels, including L-type Ca²⁺ channels, K⁺ channels, and TRP channels (39–41).To better understand the function of ASIC1a channels in macromolecular complexes, we asked if ASIC1a associates with α-actinins. We were interested in the α-actinins because they and ASIC1a, both, are present in dendritic spines, ASIC1a contains a potential α-actinin binding sequence, and the related epithelial Na⁺ channel (ENaC) interacts with the cytoskeleton (42, 43). Therefore, we hypothesized that α-actinin interacts structurally and functionally with ASIC1a.     

Energetic Requirements for Processive Elongation of Actin Filaments by FH1FH2-formins

Formin-homology (FH) 2 domains from formin proteins associate processively with the barbed ends of actin filaments through many rounds of actin subunit addition before dissociating completely. Interaction of the actin monomer-binding protein profilin with the FH1 domain speeds processive barbed end elongation by FH2 domains. In this study, we examined the energetic requirements for fast processive elongation. In contrast to previous proposals, direct microscopic observations of single molecules of the formin Bni1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae labeled with quantum dots showed that profilin is not required for formin-mediated processive elongation of growing barbed ends. ATP-actin subunits polymerized by Bni1p and profilin release the γ-phosphate of ATP on average >2.5 min after becoming incorporated into filaments. Therefore, the release of γ-phosphate from actin does not drive processive elongation. We compared experimentally observed rates of processive elongation by a number of different FH2 domains to kinetic computer simulations and found that actin subunit addition alone likely provides the energy for fast processive elongation of filaments mediated by FH1FH2-formin and profilin. We also studied the role of FH2 structure in processive elongation. We found that the flexible linker joining the two halves of the FH2 dimer has a strong influence on dissociation of formins from barbed ends but only a weak effect on elongation rates. Because formins are most vulnerable to dissociation during translocation along the growing barbed end, we propose that the flexible linker influences the lifetime of this translocative state.Formins are multidomain proteins that assemble unbranched actin filament structures for diverse processes in eukaryotic cells (reviewed in Ref. 1). Formins stimulate nucleation of actin filaments and, in the presence of the actin monomer-binding protein profilin, speed elongation of the barbed ends of filaments (2-6). The ability of formins to influence elongation depends on the ability of single formin molecules to remain bound to a growing barbed end through multiple rounds of actin subunit addition (7, 8). To stay associated during subunit addition, a formin molecule must translocate processively on the barbed end as each actin subunit is added (1, 9-12). This processive elongation of a barbed end by a formin is terminated when the formin dissociates stochastically from the growing end during translocation (4, 10).The formin-homology (FH)² 1 and 2 domains are the best conserved domains of formin proteins (2, 13, 14). The FH2 domain is the signature domain of formins, and in many cases, is sufficient for both nucleation and processive elongation of barbed ends (2-4, 7, 15). Head-to-tail homodimers of FH2 domains (12, 16) encircle the barbed ends of actin filaments (9). In vitro, association of barbed ends with FH2 domains slows elongation by limiting addition of free actin monomers. This “gating” behavior is usually explained by a rapid equilibrium of the FH2-associated end between an open state competent for actin monomer association and a closed state that blocks monomer binding (4, 9, 17).Proline-rich FH1 domains located N-terminal to FH2 domains are required for profilin to stimulate formin-mediated elongation. Individual tracks of polyproline in FH1 domains bind 1:1 complexes of profilin-actin and transfer the actin directly to the FH2-associated barbed end to increase processive elongation rates (4-6, 8, 10, 17).Rates of elongation and dissociation from growing barbed ends differ widely for FH1FH2 fragments from different formin homologs (4). We understand few aspects of FH1FH2 domains that influence gating, elongation or dissociation. In this study, we examined the source of energy for formin-mediated processive elongation, and the influence of FH2 structure on elongation and dissociation from growing ends. In contrast to previous proposals (6, 18), we found that fast processive elongation mediated by FH1FH2-formins is not driven by energy from the release of the γ-phosphate from ATP-actin filaments. Instead, the data show that the binding of an actin subunit to the barbed end provides the energy for processive elongation. We found that in similar polymerizing conditions, different natural FH2 domains dissociate from growing barbed ends at substantially different rates. We further observed that the length of the flexible linker between the subunits of a FH2 dimer influences dissociation much more than elongation.     

Analysis of a Critical Interaction within the Archaeal Box C/D Small Ribonucleoprotein Complex

In archaea and eukarya, box C/D ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes are responsible for 2′-O-methylation of tRNAs and rRNAs. The archaeal box C/D small RNP complex requires a small RNA component (sRNA) possessing Watson-Crick complementarity to the target RNA along with three proteins: L7Ae, Nop5p, and fibrillarin. Transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine to the target RNA is performed by fibrillarin, which by itself has no affinity for the sRNA-target duplex. Instead, it is targeted to the site of methylation through association with Nop5p, which in turn binds to the L7Ae-sRNA complex. To understand how Nop5p serves as a bridge between the targeting and catalytic functions of the box C/D small RNP complex, we have employed alanine scanning to evaluate the interaction between the Pyrococcus horikoshii Nop5p domain and an L7Ae box C/D RNA complex. From these data, we were able to construct an isolated RNA-binding domain (Nop-RBD) that folds correctly as demonstrated by x-ray crystallography and binds to the L7Ae box C/D RNA complex with near wild type affinity. These data demonstrate that the Nop-RBD is an autonomously folding and functional module important for protein assembly in a number of complexes centered on the L7Ae-kinkturn RNP.Many biological RNAs require extensive modification to attain full functionality in the cell (1). Currently there are over 100 known RNA modification types ranging from small functional group substitutions to the addition of large multi-cyclic ring structures (2). Transfer RNA, one of many functional RNAs targeted for modification (3-6), possesses the greatest modification type diversity, many of which are important for proper biological function (7). Ribosomal RNA, on the other hand, contains predominantly two types of modified nucleotides: pseudouridine and 2′-O-methylribose (8). The crystal structures of the ribosome suggest that these modifications are important for proper folding (9, 10) and structural stabilization (11) in vivo as evidenced by their strong tendency to localize to regions associated with function (8, 12, 13). These roles have been verified biochemically in a number of cases (14), whereas newly emerging functional modifications are continually being investigated.Box C/D ribonucleoprotein (RNP)³ complexes serve as RNA-guided site-specific 2′-O-methyltransferases in both archaea and eukaryotes (15, 16) where they are referred to as small RNP complexes and small nucleolar RNPs, respectively. Target RNA pairs with the sRNA guide sequence and is methylated at the 2′-hydroxyl group of the nucleotide five bases upstream of either the D or D′ box motif of the sRNA (Fig. 1, star) (17, 18). In archaea, the internal C′ and D′ motifs generally conform to a box C/D consensus sequence (19), and each sRNA contains two guide regions ∼12 nucleotides in length (20). The bipartite architecture of the RNP potentially enables the complex to methylate two distinct RNA targets (21) and has been shown to be essential for site-specific methylation (22).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Organization of the archaeal box C/D complex. The protein components of this RNP are L7Ae, Nop5p, and fibrillarin, which together bind a box C/D sRNA. The regions of the Box C/D sRNA corresponding to the conserved C, D, C′, and D′ boxes are labeled. The target RNA binds the sRNA through Watson-Crick pairing and is methylated by fibrillarin at the fifth nucleotide from the D/D′ boxes (star).In addition to the sRNA, the archaeal box C/D complex requires three proteins for activity (23): the ribosomal protein L7Ae (24, 25), fibrillarin, and the Nop56/Nop58 homolog Nop5p (Fig. 1). L7Ae binds to both box C/D and the C′/D′ motifs (26), which respectively comprise kink-turn (27) or k-loop structures (28), to initiate the assembly of the RNP (29, 30). Fibrillarin performs the methyl group transfer from the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine to the target RNA (31-33). For this to occur, the active site of fibrillarin must be positioned precisely over the specific 2′-hydroxyl group to be methylated. Although fibrillarin methylates this functional group in the context of a Watson-Crick base-paired helix (guide/target), it has little to no binding affinity for double-stranded RNA or for the L7Ae-sRNA complex (22, 26, 33, 34). Nop5p serves as an intermediary protein bringing fibrillarin to the complex through its association with both the L7Ae-sRNA complex and fibrillarin (22). Along with its role as an intermediary between fibrillarin and the L7Ae-sRNA complex, Nop5p possesses other functions not yet fully understood. For example, Nop5p self-dimerizes through a coiled-coil domain (35) that in most archaea and eukaryotic homologs includes a small insertion sequence of unknown function (36, 37). However, dimerization and fibrillarin binding have been shown to be mutually exclusive in Methanocaldococcus jannaschii Nop5p, potentially because of the presence of this insertion sequence (36). Thus, whether Nop5p is a monomer or a dimer in the active RNP is still under debate.In this study, we focus our attention on the Nop5p protein to investigate its interaction with a L7Ae box C/D RNA complex because both the fibrillarin-Nop5p and the L7Ae box C/D RNA interfaces are known from crystal structures (29, 35, 38). Individual residues on the surface of a monomeric form of Nop5p (referred to as mNop5p) (22) were mutated to alanine, and the effect on binding affinity for a L7Ae box C/D motif RNA complex was assessed through the use of electrophoretic mobility shift assays. These data reveal that residues important for binding cluster within the highly conserved NOP domain (39, 40). To demonstrate that this domain is solely responsible for the affinity of Nop5p for the preassembled L7Ae box C/D RNA complex, we expressed and purified it in isolation from the full Nop5p protein. The isolated Nop-RBD domain binds to the L7Ae box C/D RNA complex with nearly wild type affinity, demonstrating that the Nop-RBD is truly an autonomously folding and functional module. Comparison of our data with the crystal structure of the homologous spliceosomal hPrp31-15.5K protein-U4 snRNA complex (41) suggests the adoption of a similar mode of binding, further supporting a crucial role for the NOP domain in RNP complex assembly.     

Rab1 Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor SidM Is a Major Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate-binding Effector Protein of Legionella pneumophila

The causative agent of Legionnaires disease, Legionella pneumophila, forms a replicative vacuole in phagocytes by means of the intracellular multiplication/defective organelle trafficking (Icm/Dot) type IV secretion system and translocated effector proteins, some of which subvert host GTP and phosphoinositide (PI) metabolism. The Icm/Dot substrate SidC anchors to the membrane of Legionella-containing vacuoles (LCVs) by specifically binding to phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns(4)P). Using a nonbiased screen for novel L. pneumophila PI-binding proteins, we identified the Rab1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) SidM/DrrA as the predominant PtdIns(4)P-binding protein. Purified SidM specifically and directly bound to PtdIns(4)P, whereas the SidM-interacting Icm/Dot substrate LidA preferentially bound PtdIns(3)P but also PtdIns(4)P, and the L. pneumophila Arf1 GEF RalF did not bind to any PIs. The PtdIns(4)P-binding domain of SidM was mapped to the 12-kDa C-terminal sequence, termed “P4M” (PtdIns4P binding of SidM/DrrA). The isolated P4M domain is largely helical and displayed higher PtdIns(4)P binding activity in the context of the α-helical, monomeric full-length protein. SidM constructs containing P4M were translocated by Icm/Dot-proficient L. pneumophila and localized to the LCV membrane, indicating that SidM anchors to PtdIns(4)P on LCVs via its P4M domain. An L. pneumophila ΔsidM mutant strain displayed significantly higher amounts of SidC on LCVs, suggesting that SidM and SidC compete for limiting amounts of PtdIns(4)P on the vacuole. Finally, RNA interference revealed that PtdIns(4)P on LCVs is specifically formed by host PtdIns 4-kinase IIIβ. Thus, L. pneumophila exploits PtdIns(4)P produced by PtdIns 4-kinase IIIβ to anchor the effectors SidC and SidM to LCVs.The Gram-negative pathogen Legionella pneumophila is the causative agent of Legionnaires disease, but it evolved as a parasite of various species of environmental predatory protozoa, including the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum (1, 2). The human disease is linked to the inhalation of contaminated aerosols, followed by replication in alveolar macrophages. To accommodate the transfer between host cells, L. pneumophila alternates between replicative and transmissive phases, the regulation of which includes an apparent quorum-sensing system (3–5).In macrophages and amoebae, L. pneumophila forms a replicative compartment, the Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV).³ LCVs avoid fusion with lysosomes (6), intercept vesicular traffic at endoplasmic reticulum (ER) exit sites (7), and fuse with the ER (8–10). The uptake of L. pneumophila and formation of LCVs in macrophages and amoebae depends on the Icm/Dot type IV secretion system (T4SS) (11–14). Although more than 100 Icm/Dot substrates (“effector” proteins) have been identified to date, only few are functionally characterized, including effectors that interfere with host cell signal transduction, vesicle trafficking, or apoptotic pathways (15–18).Two Icm/Dot-translocated substrates, SidM/DrrA (19, 20) and RalF (21), have been characterized as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the Rho subfamily of small GTPases. These bacterial GEFs are recruited to and activate their targets on LCVs. Small GTPases of the Rho subfamily are involved in many eukaryotic signal transduction pathways and in actin cytoskeleton regulation (22). Inactive Rho GTPases bind GDP and a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI). The GTPases are activated by removal of the GDI and the exchange of GDP with GTP by GEFs, which promotes the interaction with downstream effector proteins, such as protein or lipid kinases and various adaptor proteins. The cycle is closed by hydrolysis of the bound GTP, which is mediated by GTPase-activating proteins.SidM is a GEF for Rab1, which is essential for ER to Golgi vesicle transport, and additionally, SidM acts as a GDI displacement factor (GDF) to activate Rab1 (23, 24). The function of SidM is assisted by the Icm/Dot substrate LidA, which also localizes to LCVs. LidA preferentially binds to activated Rab1, thus supporting the recruitment of early secretory vesicles by SidM (19, 20, 23, 25, 26). Another Icm/Dot substrate, LepB (27), contributes to Rab1-mediated membrane cycling by inactivating Rab1 through its GTPase-activating protein function, thus acting as an antagonist of SidM (24).The Icm/Dot substrate RalF recruits and activates the small GTPase ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (Arf1), which is involved in retrograde vesicle transport from Golgi to ER (21). Dominant negative Arf1 (7, 28) or knockdown of Arf1 by RNA interference (29) impairs the formation of LCVs, as well as the recruitment of the Icm/Dot substrate SidC to the LCV (30).SidC and its paralogue SdcA localize to the LCV membrane (31), where the proteins specifically bind to the host cell lipid phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns(4)P) (32, 33). Phosphoinositides (PIs) regulate eukaryotic receptor-mediated signal transduction, actin remodeling, and membrane dynamics (34, 35). PtdIns(4)P is present on the cytoplasmic membrane, but localizes preferentially to the trans-Golgi network (TGN), where this PI is produced by an Arf-dependent recruitment of PtdIns(4)P kinase IIIβ (PI4K IIIβ) (36) to promote trafficking along the secretory pathway. Recently, PtdIns(4)P was found to also mediate the export of early secretory vesicles from ER exit sites (37). At present, the L. pneumophila effector proteins that mediate exploitation of host PI signaling remain ill defined.In a nonbiased screen for L. pneumophila PI-binding proteins using different PIs coupled to agarose beads, we identified SidM as a major PtdIns(4)P-binding effector. We mapped its PtdIns(4)P binding activity to a novel P4M domain within a 12-kDa C-terminal sequence. SidM constructs, including the P4M domain, were found to be translocated and bind the LCV membrane, where the levels of PtdIns(4)P are controlled by PI4K IIIβ.     

Sequential protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent and PKC-independent protein kinase D catalytic activation via Gq-coupled receptors: differential regulation of activation loop Ser(744) and Ser(748) phosphorylation

Protein kinase D (PKD) is a serine/threonine protein kinase rapidly activated by G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists via a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent pathway. Recently, PKD has been implicated in the regulation of long term cellular activities, but little is known about the mechanism(s) of sustained PKD activation. Here, we show that cell treatment with the preferential PKC inhibitors GF 109203X or Gö 6983 blocked rapid (1–5-min) PKD activation induced by bombesin stimulation, but this inhibition was greatly diminished at later times of bombesin stimulation (e.g. 45 min). These results imply that GPCR-induced PKD activation is mediated by early PKC-dependent and late PKC-independent mechanisms. Western blot analysis with site-specific antibodies that detect the phosphorylated state of the activation loop residues Ser⁷⁴⁴ and Ser⁷⁴⁸ revealed striking PKC-independent phosphorylation of Ser⁷⁴⁸ as well as Ser⁷⁴⁴ phosphorylation that remained predominantly but not completely PKC-dependent at later times of bombesin or vasopressin stimulation (20–90 min). To determine the mechanisms involved, we examined activation loop phosphorylation in a set of PKD mutants, including kinase-deficient, constitutively activated, and PKD forms in which the activation loop residues were substituted for alanine. Our results show that PKC-dependent phosphorylation of the activation loop Ser⁷⁴⁴ and Ser⁷⁴⁸ is the primary mechanism involved in early phase PKD activation, whereas PKD autophosphorylation on Ser⁷⁴⁸ is a major mechanism contributing to the late phase of PKD activation occurring in cells stimulated by GPCR agonists. The present studies identify a novel mechanism induced by GPCR activation that leads to late, PKC-independent PKD activation.A rapid increase in the synthesis of lipid-derived second messengers with subsequent activation of protein phosphorylation cascades has emerged as a fundamental signal transduction mechanism triggered by multiple extracellular stimuli, including hormones, neurotransmitters, chemokines, and growth factors (1). Many of these agonists bind to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs),⁴ activate heterotrimeric G proteins and stimulate isoforms of the phospholipase C family, including β, γ, δ, and ε (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Activated phospholipase Cs catalyze the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to produce the second messengers inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol (DAG). Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate mobilizes Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores (3, 4) whereas DAG directly activates the classic (α, β, and γ) and novel (δ, ε, η, and θ) isoforms of PKC (5–7). Although it is increasingly recognized that each PKC isozyme has specific functions in vivo (5–8), the mechanisms by which PKC-mediated signals are propagated to critical downstream targets remain incompletely defined.PKD, also known initially as PKCμ (9, 10), and two recently identified serine protein kinases termed PKD2 (11) and PKCν/PKD3 (12, 13), which are similar in overall structure and primary amino acid sequence to PKD (14), constitute a new protein kinase family within the Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase group (15) and separate from the previously identified PKCs (14). Salient features of PKD structure include an N-terminal regulatory region containing a tandem repeat of cysteine-rich zinc finger-like motifs (termed the cysteine-rich domain) that confers high affinity binding to phorbol esters and DAG (9, 16, 17), followed by a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain that negatively regulates catalytic activity (18, 19). The C-terminal region of the PKDs contains its catalytic domain, which is distantly related to Ca²⁺-regulated kinases.In unstimulated cells, PKD is in a state of low kinase catalytic activity maintained by the N-terminal domain, which represses the catalytic activity of the enzyme by autoinhibition. Consistent with this model, deletions or single amino acid substitutions in the PH domain result in constitutive kinase activity (18–20). Physiological activation of PKD within cells occurs via a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism first identified in our laboratory (21). In response to cellular stimuli, PKD is converted from a low activity form into a persistently active form that is retained during isolation from cells, as shown by in vitro kinase assays performed in the absence of lipid co-activators (21, 22). PKD activation has been demonstrated in response to engagement of specific GPCRs either by regulatory peptides (23–30) or lysophosphatidic acid (27, 31, 32); signaling through G_q, G₁₂, G_i, and Rho (27, 31–34); activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, such as the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (23, 35, 36); cross-linking of B-cell receptor and T-cell receptor in B and T lymphocytes, respectively (37–40); and oxidative stress (41–44).Throughout these studies, multiple lines of evidence indicated that PKC activity is necessary for rapid PKD activation within intact cells. For example, rapid PKD activation was selectively and potently blocked by cell treatment with preferential PKC inhibitors (e.g. GF 109203X or Gö 6983) that do not directly inhibit PKD catalytic activity (21, 22), implying that PKD activation in intact cells is mediated, directly or indirectly, through PKCs. In line with this conclusion, cotransfection of PKD with active mutant forms of “novel” PKCs (PKCs δ, ε, η, and θ) resulted in robust PKD activation in the absence of cell stimulation (21, 44–46). Many reports demonstrated the operation of a rapid PKC/PKD signaling cascade in response to multiple GPCR agonists in a broad range of cell types, including normal and cancer cells (reviewed in Ref. 14). Our previous studies identified Ser⁷⁴⁴ and Ser⁷⁴⁸ in the PKD activation loop (also referred as the activation segment or T-loop) as phosphorylation sites critical for PKC-mediated PKD activation (reviewed in Ref. 14). Collectively, these findings demonstrated the existence of rapidly activated PKC-PKD protein kinase cascade(s) and raised the possibility that some PKC-dependent biological responses involve PKD acting as a downstream effector.PKD has been reported recently to mediate several important cellular activities and processes, including signal transduction (30, 47–49), chromatin modification (50), Golgi organization and function (51, 52), c-Jun function (47, 53, 54), NFκB-mediated gene expression (43, 55, 56), and cell survival, migration, and differentiation and DNA synthesis and proliferation (reviewed in Ref. 14). Thus, mounting evidence indicates that PKD has a remarkable diversity of both its signal generation and distribution and its potential for complex regulatory interactions with multiple downstream pathways, leading to multiple responses, including long term cellular events. Despite increasing recognition of its importance, very little is known about the mechanism(s) of sustained PKD activation as opposed to the well documented rapid, PKC-dependent PKD activation.The results presented here demonstrate that prolonged GPCR-induced PKD activation is mediated by sequential PKC-dependent and PKC-independent phases of regulation. We report here, for the first time, that PKD autophosphorylation on Ser⁷⁴⁸ is a major mechanism contributing to the late phase of PKD activation occurring in cells stimulated by GPCR agonists. The present studies expand previous models of PKD regulation by identifying a novel mechanism induced by GPCR activation that leads to late, PKC-independent PKD activation.     

Bortezomib Overcomes Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in Part through the Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However, many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib, indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)² is currently the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment but is only feasible in a small portion of patients (1). Drug treatment is the major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory (1). Novel pharmacological therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation (2). TRAIL functions by engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1, DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4 and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance. Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several studies (4, 5). In addition, inactivation of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL in MMR-deficient tumors (6, 7), and reintroduction of Bax into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity (8), indicating that the Bcl-2 family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of cancer (9). Accumulating studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (4), lymphoma (10–13), prostate (14–17), colon (15, 18, 19), bladder (14, 16), renal cell carcinoma (20), thyroid (21), ovary (22), non-small cell lung (23, 24), sarcoma (25), and HCC (26, 27). Molecular targets responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell death include DR4 (14, 27), DR5 (14, 20, 22–23, 28), c-FLIP (4, 11, 21–23, 29), NF-κB (12, 24, 30), p21 (16, 21, 25), and p27 (25). In addition, Bcl-2 family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL, including Bcl-2 (10, 21), Bax (13, 22), Bak (27), Bcl-xL (21), Bik (18), and Bim (15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells (31). In this study, we demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.     

Structure of a Viral Cap-independent Translation Element That Functions via High Affinity Binding to the eIF4E Subunit of eIF4F

RNAs of many positive strand RNA viruses lack a 5′ cap structure and instead rely on cap-independent translation elements (CITEs) to facilitate efficient translation initiation. The mechanisms by which these RNAs recruit ribosomes are poorly understood, and for many viruses the CITE is unknown. Here we identify the first CITE of an umbravirus in the 3′-untranslated region of pea enation mosaic virus RNA 2. Chemical and enzymatic probing of the ∼100-nucleotide PEMV RNA 2 CITE (PTE), and mutagenesis revealed that it forms a long, bulged helix that branches into two short stem-loops, with a possible pseudoknot interaction between a C-rich bulge at the branch point and a G-rich bulge in the main helix. The PTE inhibited translation in trans, and addition of eIF4F, but not eIFiso4F, restored translation. Filter binding assays revealed that the PTE binds eIF4F and its eIF4E subunit with high affinity. Tight binding required an intact cap-binding pocket in eIF4E. Among many PTE mutants, there was a strong correlation between PTE-eIF4E binding affinity and ability to stimulate cap-independent translation. We conclude that the PTE recruits eIF4F by binding eIF4E. The PTE represents a different class of translation enhancer element, as defined by its structure and ability to bind eIF4E in the absence of an m⁷G cap.Regulation of translation occurs primarily at the initiation step. This involves recognition of the 5′ m⁷G(5′)ppp(5′)N cap structure on the mRNA by initiation factors, which recruit the ribosome to the 5′-end of the mRNA (1–5). The 5′ cap structure and the poly(A) tail are necessary for efficient recruitment of initiation factors on eukaryotic mRNAs (3, 6–8). The cap is recognized by the eIF4E subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor complex eIF4F (or the eIFiso4E subunit of eIFiso4F in higher plants). The poly(A) tail is recognized by poly(A)-binding protein. In plants, eIF4F is a heterodimer consisting of eIF4E and eIF4G, the core scaffolding protein to which the other factors bind. eIF4A, an ATPase/RNA helicase, interacts with eIF4F but is not part of the eIF4F heterodimer (9, 10). For translation initiation, the purpose of eIF4E is to bring eIF4G to the capped mRNA. eIF4G then recruits the 43 S ternary ribosomal complex via interaction with eIF3.The RNAs of many positive sense RNA viruses contain a cap-independent translation element (CITE)³ that allows efficient translation in the absence of a 5′ cap structure (11–13). In animal viruses and some plant viruses, the CITE is an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) located upstream of the initiation codon. Most viral IRESes neither interact with nor require eIF4E, because they lack the m⁷GpppN structure, which, until this report, was thought to be necessary for mRNA to bind eIF4E with high affinity (3, 14). Translation initiation efficiency of mRNA is also influenced by the length of, and the degree of secondary structure in the 5′ leader (15–17).Many uncapped plant viral RNAs harbor a CITE in the 3′-UTR that confers highly efficient translation initiation at the 5′-end of the mRNA (18–22). These 3′ CITEs facilitate ribosome entry and apparently conventional scanning at the 5′-end of the mRNA (17, 23, 24). A variety of unrelated structures has been found to function as 3′ CITEs, suggesting that they recruit the ribosome by different interactions with initiation factors (13).The factors with which a plant CITE interacts to recruit the ribosome have been identified for only a potyvirus, a luteovirus, and a satellite RNA. The 143-nt 5′-UTR CITE of the potyvirus, tobacco etch virus is an IRES that functions by binding of its AU-rich pseudoknot structure with eIF4G (25). It binds eIF4G with up to 30-fold greater affinity than eIFiso4G and does not require eIF4E for IRES activity. In addition to RNA elements, the genome-linked viral protein (VPg) of potyviruses may participate in cap-independent translation initiation by interacting with the eIF4E and eIFiso4E subunits of eIF4F and eIFiso4F, respectively (26–31). In contrast, the 130-nt cap-independent translation enhancer domain (TED) in the 3′-UTR of satellite tobacco necrosis virus (STNV) RNA forms a long bulged stem-loop, which interacts strongly with both eIF4F and eIFiso4F and weakly with their eIF4E and eIFiso4E subunits (32), suggesting that the TED requires the full eIF4F or eIFiso4F for a biologically relevant interaction. Barley yellow dwarf luteovirus (BYDV) and several other viruses, have a different structure, called a BYDV-like CITE (BTE), in the 3′-UTR. The BTE is characterized by a 17-nt conserved sequence incorporated in a structure with a variable number of stem-loops radiating from a central junction (20, 33, 34). It requires and binds the eIF4G subunit of eIF4F and does not bind free eIF4E, eIFiso4E, or eIFiso4G, although eIF4E slightly enhances the BTE-eIF4G interaction (35). Other 3′ CITEs have been identified, but the host factors with which they interact are unknown.Here we describe unprecedented factor interactions of a CITE found in an umbravirus and a panicovirus. Umbraviruses show strong similarity to the Luteovirus and Dianthovirus genera in (i) the sequence of the replication genes encoded by ORFs 1 and 2, (ii) the predicted structure of the frameshift signals required for translation of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from ORF 2 (36, 37), (iii) the absence of a poly(A) tail, and (iv) the lack of a 5′ cap structure (37, 38). Umbraviruses are unique in that they encode no coat protein. For the umbravirus pea enation mosaic virus 2 (PEMV-2), the coat protein is provided by PEMV-1, an enamovirus (39). Uncapped PEMV-2 RNA (PEMV RNA 2), transcribed in vitro, is infectious in pea (Pisum sativa),⁴ indicating it must be translated cap-independently. The 3′-UTRs of some umbraviruses such as Tobacco bushy top virus and Groundnut rosette virus harbor sequences resembling BYDV-like CITEs (BTE).⁵ However, no BTE is apparent in the 3′-UTR of PEMV RNA 2. In this report we identify a different class of CITE in the 705-nt long 3′-UTR of PEMV RNA 2, determine its secondary structure, which may include an unusual pseudoknot, and we show that, unlike any other natural uncapped RNA, it has a high affinity for eIF4E, which is necessary to facilitate cap-independent translation.     

Residues Important for Nitrate/Proton Coupling in Plant and Mammalian CLC Transporters

Members of the CLC gene family either function as chloride channels or as anion/proton exchangers. The plant AtClC-a uses the pH gradient across the vacuolar membrane to accumulate the nutrient in this organelle. When AtClC-a was expressed in Xenopus oocytes, it mediated exchange and less efficiently mediated Cl^–/H⁺ exchange. Mutating the “gating glutamate” Glu-203 to alanine resulted in an uncoupled anion conductance that was larger for Cl^– than . Replacing the “proton glutamate” Glu-270 by alanine abolished currents. These could be restored by the uncoupling E203A mutation. Whereas mammalian endosomal ClC-4 and ClC-5 mediate stoichiometrically coupled 2Cl^–/H⁺ exchange, their transport is largely uncoupled from protons. By contrast, the AtClC-a-mediated accumulation in plant vacuoles requires tight coupling. Comparison of AtClC-a and ClC-5 sequences identified a proline in AtClC-a that is replaced by serine in all mammalian CLC isoforms. When this proline was mutated to serine (P160S), Cl^–/H⁺ exchange of AtClC-a proceeded as efficiently as exchange, suggesting a role of this residue in exchange. Indeed, when the corresponding serine of ClC-5 was replaced by proline, this Cl^–/H⁺ exchanger gained efficient coupling. When inserted into the model Torpedo chloride channel ClC-0, the equivalent mutation increased nitrate relative to chloride conductance. Hence, proline in the CLC pore signature sequence is important for exchange and conductance both in plants and mammals. Gating and proton glutamates play similar roles in bacterial, plant, and mammalian CLC anion/proton exchangers.CLC proteins are found in all phyla from bacteria to humans and either mediate electrogenic anion/proton exchange or function as chloride channels (1). In mammals, the roles of plasma membrane CLC Cl^– channels include transepithelial transport (2–5) and control of muscle excitability (6), whereas vesicular CLC exchangers may facilitate endocytosis (7) and lysosomal function (8–10) by electrically shunting vesicular proton pump currents (11). In the plant Arabidopsis thaliana, there are seven CLC isoforms (AtClC-a–AtClC-g)² (12–15), which may mostly reside in intracellular membranes. AtClC-a uses the pH gradient across the vacuolar membrane to transport the nutrient nitrate into that organelle (16). This secondary active transport requires a tightly coupled exchange. Astonishingly, however, mammalian ClC-4 and -5 and bacterial EcClC-1 (one of the two CLC isoforms in Escherichia coli) display tightly coupled Cl^–/H⁺ exchange, but anion flux is largely uncoupled from H⁺ when is transported (17–21). The lack of appropriate expression systems for plant CLC transporters (12) has so far impeded structure-function analysis that may shed light on the ability of AtClC-a to perform efficient exchange. This dearth of data contrasts with the extensive mutagenesis work performed with CLC proteins from animals and bacteria.The crystal structure of bacterial CLC homologues (22, 23) and the investigation of mutants (17, 19–21, 24–29) have yielded important insights into their structure and function. CLC proteins form dimers with two largely independent permeation pathways (22, 25, 30, 31). Each of the monomers displays two anion binding sites (22). A third binding site is observed when a certain key glutamate residue, which is located halfway in the permeation pathway of almost all CLC proteins, is mutated to alanine (23). Mutating this gating glutamate in CLC Cl^– channels strongly affects or even completely suppresses single pore gating (23), whereas CLC exchangers are transformed by such mutations into pure anion conductances that are not coupled to proton transport (17, 19, 20). Another key glutamate, located at the cytoplasmic surface of the CLC monomer, seems to be a hallmark of CLC anion/proton exchangers. Mutating this proton glutamate to nontitratable amino acids uncouples anion transport from protons in the bacterial EcClC-1 protein (27) but seems to abolish transport altogether in mammalian ClC-4 and -5 (21). In those latter proteins, anion transport could be restored by additionally introducing an uncoupling mutation at the gating glutamate (21).The functional complementation by AtClC-c and -d (12, 32) of growth phenotypes of a yeast strain deleted for the single yeast CLC Gef1 (33) suggested that these plant CLC proteins function in anion transport but could not reveal details of their biophysical properties. We report here the first functional expression of a plant CLC in animal cells. Expression of wild-type (WT) and mutant AtClC-a in Xenopus oocytes indicate a general role of gating and proton glutamate residues in anion/proton coupling across different isoforms and species. We identified a proline in the CLC signature sequence of AtClC-a that plays a crucial role in exchange. Mutating it to serine, the residue present in mammalian CLC proteins at this position, rendered AtClC-a Cl^–/H⁺ exchange as efficient as exchange. Conversely, changing the corresponding serine of ClC-5 to proline converted it into an efficient exchanger. When proline replaced the critical serine in Torpedo ClC-0, the relative conductance of this model Cl^– channel was drastically increased, and “fast” protopore gating was slowed.     

Initiation of New DNA Strands by the Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Primase-Helicase Complex and Either Herpes DNA Polymerase or Human DNA Polymerase ��

A key set of reactions for the initiation of new DNA strands during herpes simplex virus-1 replication consists of the primase-catalyzed synthesis of short RNA primers followed by polymerase-catalyzed DNA synthesis (i.e. primase-coupled polymerase activity). Herpes primase (UL5-UL52-UL8) synthesizes products from 2 to ∼13 nucleotides long. However, the herpes polymerase (UL30 or UL30-UL42) only elongates those at least 8 nucleotides long. Surprisingly, coupled activity was remarkably inefficient, even considering only those primers at least 8 nucleotides long, and herpes polymerase typically elongated <2% of the primase-synthesized primers. Of those primers elongated, only 4–26% of the primers were passed directly from the primase to the polymerase (UL30-UL42) without dissociating into solution. Comparing RNA primer-templates and DNA primer-templates of identical sequence showed that herpes polymerase greatly preferred to elongate the DNA primer by 650–26,000-fold, thus accounting for the extremely low efficiency with which herpes polymerase elongated primase-synthesized primers. Curiously, one of the DNA polymerases of the host cell, polymerase α (p70-p180 or p49-p58-p70-p180 complex), extended herpes primase-synthesized RNA primers much more efficiently than the viral polymerase, raising the possibility that the viral polymerase may not be the only one involved in herpes DNA replication.Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1)² encodes seven proteins essential for replicating its double-stranded DNA genome; five of these encode the heterotrimeric helicase-primase (UL5-UL52-UL8 gene products) and the heterodimeric polymerase (UL30-UL42 gene products) (1, 2). The helicase-primase unwinds the DNA at the replication fork and generates single-stranded DNA for both leading and lagging strand synthesis. Primase synthesizes short RNA primers on the lagging strand that the polymerase presumably elongates using dNTPs (i.e. primase-coupled polymerase activity). These two protein complexes are thought to replicate the viral genome on both the leading and lagging strands (1, 2).Previous studies have focused on the helicase-primase and polymerase separately. The helicase-primase contains three subunits, UL5, UL52, and UL8 in a 1:1:1 ratio (3–5). The UL5 subunit has helicase-like motifs and the UL52 subunit has primase-like motifs, yet the minimal active complex that demonstrates either helicase or primase activities contains both UL5 and UL52 (6, 7). Although the UL8 subunit has no known catalytic activity, several functions have been proposed, including enhancing helicase and primase activities, enhancing primer synthesis on ICP8 (the HSV-1 single-stranded binding protein)-coated DNA strands, and facilitating formation of the replisome (8–12). Although primase will synthesize short (2–3 nucleotides long) primers on a variety of template sequences, synthesis of longer primers up to 13 nucleotides long requires the template sequence, 3′-deoxyguanidine-pyrimidine-pyrimidine-5′ (13). Primase initiates synthesis at the first pyrimidine via the polymerization of two purine NTPs (13). Even after initiation at this sequence, however, the vast majority of products are only 2–3 nucleotides long (13, 14).The herpes polymerase consists of the UL30 subunit, which has polymerase and 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activities (1, 2), and the UL42 subunit, which serves as a processivity factor (15–17). Unlike most processivity factors that encircle the DNA, the UL42 protein binds double-stranded DNA and thus directly tethers the polymerase to the DNA (18). Using pre-existing DNA primer-templates as the substrate, the heterodimeric polymerase (UL30-UL42) incorporates dNTPs at a rate of 150 s^–1, a rate much faster than primer synthesis (for primers >7 nucleotides long, 0.0002–0.01 s^–1) (19, 20).We examined primase-coupled polymerase activity by the herpes primase and polymerase complexes. Although herpes primase synthesizes RNA primers 2–13 nucleotides long, the polymerase only effectively elongates those at least 8 nucleotides long. Surprisingly, the polymerase elongated only a small fraction of the primase-synthesized primers (<1–2%), likely because of the polymerase elongating RNA primer-templates much less efficiently than DNA primer-templates. In contrast, human DNA polymerase α (pol α) elongated the herpes primase-synthesized primers very efficiently. The biological significance of these data is discussed.     

Loss of PINK1 Function Promotes Mitophagy through Effects on Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Fission

Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease. Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1 function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1. Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines. Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response. The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects ∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown, although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA),³ and rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models (1). Abnormalities in mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells and tissues from parkinsonian patients (2, 3), which also exhibit increased mitochondrial autophagy (4). Furthermore, mutations in parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis (5). Thus, disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) (6, 7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence (6, 8). The primary sequence also includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the PINK1 domain (8), a conserved kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity (9, 10). Overexpression of wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several toxic insults in neuronal cells (6, 11, 12). Mitochondrial targeting is necessary for some (13) but not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1 (14), implicating involvement of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology (8). PINK1 catalytic activity is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to protect neurons (14). Although PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of neuroprotective activities (13, 15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically (3, 16-18) to prevent oxidative stress (19, 20) and regulate mitochondrial morphology (21). Primary cells derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells (3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs) for delivery to lysosomes (22, 23). Interestingly, mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24, 25). Moreover, mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases (4, 26-28). Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) (29, 30). In particular, mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models involving oxidative mitochondrial injury (25, 31, 32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates (33-35) and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology (36). Chronic disruption of lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria with decreased calcium buffering capacity (37), implicating an important role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis (37, 38). Recently, Parkin, which complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology (3), was found to promote autophagy of depolarized mitochondria (39). Conversely, Beclin 1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA (25, 28, 31, 32), causing neurite retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (40). Whereas properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role, excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration (28).As mitochondrial fragmentation (3) and increased mitochondrial autophagy (4) have been described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks, suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function.     

Polo-like Kinase 2 (PLK2) Phosphorylates ��-Synuclein at Serine 129 in Central Nervous System

Several neurological diseases, including Parkinson disease and dementia with Lewy bodies, are characterized by the accumulation of α-synuclein phosphorylated at Ser-129 (p-Ser-129). The kinase or kinases responsible for this phosphorylation have been the subject of intense investigation. Here we submit evidence that polo-like kinase 2 (PLK2, also known as serum-inducible kinase or SNK) is a principle contributor to α-synuclein phosphorylation at Ser-129 in neurons. PLK2 directly phosphorylates α-synuclein at Ser-129 in an in vitro biochemical assay. Inhibitors of PLK kinases inhibited α-synuclein phosphorylation both in primary cortical cell cultures and in mouse brain in vivo. Finally, specific knockdown of PLK2 expression by transduction with short hairpin RNA constructs or by knock-out of the plk2 gene reduced p-Ser-129 levels. These results indicate that PLK2 plays a critical role in α-synuclein phosphorylation in central nervous system.The importance of α-synuclein to the pathogenesis of Parkinson disease (PD)⁴ and the related disorder, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), is suggested by its association with Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, the inclusions that characterize these diseases (1–3), and demonstrated by the existence of mutations that cause syndromes mimicking sporadic PD and DLB (4–6). Furthermore, three separate mutations cause early onset forms of PD and DLB. It is particularly telling that duplications or triplications of the gene (7–9), which increase levels of α-synuclein with no alteration in sequence, also cause PD or DLB.α-Synuclein has been reported to be phosphorylated on serine residues, at Ser-87 and Ser-129 (10), although to date only the Ser-129 phosphorylation has been identified in the central nervous system (11, 12). Phosphorylation at tyrosine residues has been observed by some investigators (13, 14) but not by others (10–12). Phosphorylation at Ser-129 (p-Ser-129) is of particular interest because the majority of synuclein in Lewy bodies contains this modification (15). In addition, p-Ser-129 was found to be the most extensive and consistent modification in a survey of synuclein in Lewy bodies (11). Results have been mixed from studies investigating the function of phosphorylation using S129A and S129D mutations to respectively block and mimic the modification. Although the phosphorylation mimic was associated with pathology in studies in Drosophila (16) and in transgenic mouse models (17, 18), studies using adeno-associated virus vectors to overexpress α-synuclein in rat substantia nigra found an exacerbation of pathology with the S129A mutation, whereas the S129D mutation was benign, if not protective (19). Interpretation of these studies is complicated by a recent study showing that the S129D and S129A mutations themselves have effects on the aggregation properties of α-synuclein independent of their effects on phosphorylation, with the S129A mutation stimulating fibril formation (20). Clearly, determination of the role of p-Ser-129 phosphorylation would be helped by identification of the responsible kinase. In addition, identification will provide a pathologically relevant way to increase phosphorylation in a cell or animal model.Several kinases have been proposed to phosphorylate α-synuclein, including casein kinases 1 and 2 (10, 12, 21) and members of the G-protein-coupled receptor kinase family (22). In this report, we offer evidence that a member of the polo-like kinase (PLK) family, PLK2 (or serum-inducible kinase, SNK), functions as an α-synuclein kinase. The ability of PLK2 to directly phosphorylate α-synuclein at Ser-129 is established by overexpression in cell culture and by in vitro reaction with the purified kinase. We show that PLK2 phosphorylates α-synuclein in cells, including primary neuronal cultures, using a series of kinase inhibitors as well as inhibition of expression with RNA interference. In addition, inhibitor and knock-out studies in mouse brain support a role for PLK2 as an α-synuclein kinase in vivo.