The Cytoskeletal Protein ��-Actinin Regulates Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a through a C-terminal Interaction

The acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) is widely expressed in central and peripheral neurons where it generates transient cation currents when extracellular pH falls. ASIC1a confers pH-dependent modulation on postsynaptic dendritic spines and has critical effects in neurological diseases associated with a reduced pH. However, knowledge of the proteins that interact with ASIC1a and influence its function is limited. Here, we show that α-actinin, which links membrane proteins to the actin cytoskeleton, associates with ASIC1a in brain and in cultured cells. The interaction depended on an α-actinin-binding site in the ASIC1a C terminus that was specific for ASIC1a versus other ASICs and for α-actinin-1 and -4. Co-expressing α-actinin-4 altered ASIC1a current density, pH sensitivity, desensitization rate, and recovery from desensitization. Moreover, reducing α-actinin expression altered acid-activated currents in hippocampal neurons. These findings suggest that α-actinins may link ASIC1a to a macromolecular complex in the postsynaptic membrane where it regulates ASIC1a activity.Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs)² are H⁺-gated members of the DEG/ENaC family (1–3). Members of this family contain cytosolic N and C termini, two transmembrane domains, and a large cysteine-rich extracellular domain. ASIC subunits combine as homo- or heterotrimers to form cation channels that are widely expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems (1–4). In mammals, four genes encode ASICs, and two subunits, ASIC1 and ASIC2, have two splice forms, a and b. Central nervous system neurons express ASIC1a, ASIC2a, and ASIC2b (5–7). Homomeric ASIC1a channels are activated when extracellular pH drops below 7.2, and half-maximal activation occurs at pH 6.5–6.8 (8–10). These channels desensitize in the continued presence of a low extracellular pH, and they can conduct Ca²⁺ (9, 11–13). ASIC1a is required for acid-evoked currents in central nervous system neurons; disrupting the gene encoding ASIC1a eliminates H⁺-gated currents unless extracellular pH is reduced below pH 5.0 (5, 7).Previous studies found ASIC1a enriched in synaptosomal membrane fractions and present in dendritic spines, the site of excitatory synapses (5, 14, 15). Consistent with this localization, ASIC1a null mice manifested deficits in hippocampal long term potentiation, learning, and memory, which suggested that ASIC1a is required for normal synaptic plasticity (5, 16). ASICs might be activated during neurotransmission when synaptic vesicles empty their acidic contents into the synaptic cleft or when neuronal activity lowers extracellular pH (17–19). Ion channels, including those at the synapse often interact with multiple proteins in a macromolecular complex that incorporates regulators of their function (20, 21). For ASIC1a, only a few interacting proteins have been identified. Earlier work indicated that ASIC1a interacts with another postsynaptic scaffolding protein, PICK1 (15, 22, 23). ASIC1a also has been reported to interact with annexin II light chain p11 through its cytosolic N terminus to increase cell surface expression (24) and with Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II to phosphorylate the channel (25). However, whether ASIC1a interacts with additional proteins and with the cytoskeleton remain unknown. Moreover, it is not known whether such interactions alter ASIC1a function.In analyzing the ASIC1a amino acid sequence, we identified cytosolic residues that might bind α-actinins. α-Actinins cluster membrane proteins and signaling molecules into macromolecular complexes and link membrane proteins to the actincytoskeleton (for review, Ref. 26). Four genes encode α-actinin-1, -2, -3, and -4 isoforms. α-Actinins contain an N-terminal head domain that binds F-actin, a C-terminal region containing two EF-hand motifs, and a central rod domain containing four spectrin-like motifs (26–28). The C-terminal portion of the rod segment appears to be crucial for binding to membrane proteins. The α-actinins assemble into antiparallel homodimers through interactions in their rod domain. α-Actinins-1, -2, and -4 are enriched in dendritic spines, concentrating at the postsynaptic membrane (29–35). In the postsynaptic membrane of excitatory synapses, α-actinin connects the NMDA receptor to the actin cytoskeleton, and this interaction is key for Ca²⁺-dependent inhibition of NMDA receptors (36–38). α-Actinins can also regulate the membrane trafficking and function of several cation channels, including L-type Ca²⁺ channels, K⁺ channels, and TRP channels (39–41).To better understand the function of ASIC1a channels in macromolecular complexes, we asked if ASIC1a associates with α-actinins. We were interested in the α-actinins because they and ASIC1a, both, are present in dendritic spines, ASIC1a contains a potential α-actinin binding sequence, and the related epithelial Na⁺ channel (ENaC) interacts with the cytoskeleton (42, 43). Therefore, we hypothesized that α-actinin interacts structurally and functionally with ASIC1a.     

CP12 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a Permanent Specific ��Chaperone-like�� Protein of Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase

A new role is reported for CP12, a highly unfolded and flexible protein, mainly known for its redox function with A₄ glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Both reduced and oxidized CP12 can prevent the in vitro thermal inactivation and aggregation of GAPDH from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This mechanism is thus not redox-dependent. The protection is specific to CP12, because other proteins, such as bovine serum albumin, thioredoxin, and a general chaperone, Hsp33, do not fully prevent denaturation of GAPDH. Furthermore, CP12 acts as a specific chaperone, since it does not protect other proteins, such as catalase, alcohol dehydrogenase, or lysozyme. The interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is necessary to prevent the aggregation and inactivation, since the mutant C66S that does not form any complex with GAPDH cannot accomplish this protection. Unlike the C66S mutant, the C23S mutant that lacks the N-terminal bridge is partially able to protect and to slow down the inactivation and aggregation. Tryptic digestion coupled to mass spectrometry confirmed that the S-loop of GAPDH is the interaction site with CP12. Thus, CP12 not only has a redox function but also behaves as a specific “chaperone-like protein” for GAPDH, although a stable and not transitory interaction is observed. This new function of CP12 may explain why it is also present in complexes involving A₂B₂ GAPDHs that possess a regulatory C-terminal extension (GapB subunit) and therefore do not require CP12 to be redox-regulated.CP12 is a small 8.2-kDa protein present in the chloroplasts of most photosynthetic organisms, including cyanobacteria (1, 2), higher plants (3), the diatom Asterionella formosa (4, 5), and green (1) and red algae (6). It allows the formation of a supramolecular complex between phosphoribulokinase (EC 2.7.1.19) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH),³ two key enzymes of the Calvin cycle pathway, and was recently shown to interact with fructose bisphosphate aldolase, another enzyme of the Calvin cycle pathway (7). The phosphoribulokinase·GAPDH·CP12 complex has been extensively studied in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (8, 9) and in Arabidopsis thaliana (10, 11). In the green alga C. reinhardtii, the interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is strong (8). GAPDH may exist as a homotetramer composed of four GapA subunits (A₄) in higher plants, cyanobacteria, and green and red algae (6, 12), but in higher plants, it can also exist as a heterotetramer (A₂B₂), composed of two subunits, GapA and GapB (13, 14). GapB, up to now, has exclusively been found in Streptophyta, but recently two prasinophycean green algae, Ostreococcus tauri and Ostreococcus lucimarinus, were also shown to possess a GapB gene, whereas CP12 is missing (15). The GapB subunit is similar to the GapA subunit but has a C-terminal extension containing two redox-regulated cysteine residues (16). Thus, although the A₄ GAPDHs lack these regulatory cysteine residues (13, 14, 17–20), they are also redox-regulated through its interaction with CP12, since the C terminus of this small protein resembles the C-terminal extension of the GapB subunit. The regulatory cysteine residues for GapA are thus supplied by CP12, as is well documented in the literature (1, 8, 11, 16).CP12 belongs to the family of intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs) (21–26). The amino acid composition of these proteins causes them to have no or few secondary structures. Their total or partial lack of structure and their high flexibility allow them to be molecular adaptors (27, 28). They are often able to bind to several partners and are involved in most cellular functions (29, 30). Recently, some IUPs have been described in photosynthetic organisms (31, 32).There are many functional categories of IUPs (22, 33). They can be, for instance, involved in permanent binding and have (i) a scavenger role, neutralizing or storing small ligands; (ii) an assembler role by forming complexes; and (iii) an effector role by modulating the activity of a partner molecule (33). These functions are not exclusive; thus, CP12 can form a stable complex with GAPDH, regulating its redox properties (8, 34, 35), and can also bind a metal ion (36, 37). IUPs can also bind transiently to partners, and some of them have been found to possess a chaperone activity (31, 38). This chaperone function was first shown for α-synuclein (39) and for α-casein (40), which are fully disordered. The amino acid composition of IUPs is less hydrophobic than those of soluble proteins; hence, they lack hydrophobic cores and do not become insoluble when heated. Since CP12 belongs to this family, we tested if it was resistant to heat treatment and finally, since it is tightly bound to GAPDH, if it could prevent aggregation of its partner, GAPDH, an enzyme well known for its tendency to aggregate (41–44) and consequently a substrate commonly used in chaperone studies (45, 46).Unlike chaperones, which form transient, dynamic complexes with their protein substrates through hydrophobic interactions (47, 48), CP12 forms a stable complex with GAPDH. The interaction involves the C-terminal part of the protein and the presence of negatively charged residues on CP12 (35). However, only a site-directed mutagenesis has been performed to characterize the interaction site on GAPDH. Although the mutation could have an indirect effect, the residue Arg-197 was shown to be a good candidate for the interaction site (49).In this report, we accordingly used proteolysis experiments coupled with mass spectrometry to detect which regions of GAPDH are protected by its association with CP12. To conclude, the aim of this report was to characterize a chaperone function of CP12 that had never been described before and to map the interaction site on GAPDH using an approach that does not involve site-directed mutagenesis.     

Spermine Synthase Deficiency Leads to Deafness and a Profound Sensitivity to ��-Difluoromethylornithine

Male gyro (Gy) mice, which have an X chromosomal deletion inactivating the SpmS and Phex genes, were found to be profoundly hearing impaired. This defect was due to alteration in polyamine content due to the absence of spermine synthase, the product of the SpmS gene. It was reversed by breeding the Gy strain with CAG/SpmS mice, a transgenic line that ubiquitously expresses spermine synthase under the control of a composite cytomegalovirus-IE enhancer/chicken β-actin promoter. There was an almost complete loss of the endocochlear potential in the Gy mice, which parallels the hearing deficiency, and this was also reversed by the production of spermine from the spermine synthase transgene. Gy mice showed a striking toxic response to treatment with the ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO). Within 2–3 days of exposure to DFMO in the drinking water, the Gy mice suffered a catastrophic loss of motor function resulting in death within 5 days. This effect was due to an inability to maintain normal balance and was also prevented by the transgenic expression of spermine synthase. DFMO treatment of control mice or Gy-CAG/SpmS had no effect on balance. The loss of balance in Gy mice treated with DFMO was due to inhibition of polyamine synthesis because it was prevented by administration of putrescine. Our results are consistent with a critical role for polyamines in regulation of Kir channels that maintain the endocochlear potential and emphasize the importance of normal spermidine:spermine ratio in the hearing and balance functions of the inner ear.Polyamines are essential for viability in mammals. Knockouts of the genes for ornithine decarboxylase and S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, which are enzymes needed for the synthesis of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine, are lethal at early stages of embryonic development (1, 2). There is convincing evidence that the formation of hypusine in eIF5A, which requires spermidine as a precursor, is essential for eukaryotes (3). However, the function(s) of spermine is not so well established. Yeast mutants with inactivated spermine synthase grow at a normal rate (4). Mammalian cells in culture also grow normally in the presence of inhibitors of spermine synthase (5) or after inactivation of the spermine synthase gene (SpmS) (6–8). Inactivation of both of the genes that were originally described as encoding spermine synthases in plants leads to profound developmental defects (9–11), but recently it was discovered that one of these genes actually encodes a thermospermine synthase, and it appears that the lack of thermospermine may be responsible for these defects (12).In contrast, spermine is clearly required for normal development in mammals. The rare human Snyder-Robinson syndrome is caused by mutations in SpmS located in the X chromosome that drastically reduces the amount of spermine synthase (13, 14). This leads to mental retardation, hypotonia, cerebellar circuitry dysfunction, facial asymmetry, thin habitus, osteoporosis, and kyphoscoliosis. Male mice, which have an X chromosomal deletion that includes SpmS and have no detectable spermine synthase activity, do survive but are only viable on the B6C3H background (15–17). This mouse strain having an X-linked dominant mutation was isolated from a female offspring of an irradiated mouse and was termed gyro (Gy)² based on a circling behavior pattern in affected males (18). Subsequent studies have shown that the Gy mice have a deletion of part of the X chromosome that inactivates both Phex, a gene that regulates phosphate metabolism, and SpmS (16, 19). The lack of SpmS causes a total absence of spermine (6, 7, 15, 16). Such Gy mice suffer from hypophosphatemia, have a greatly reduced size, sterility, and neurological abnormalities, and have a short life span (6, 16, 18). All of these changes except the hypophosphatemia are reversed when spermine synthase activity is restored (20).The original characterization of Gy mice also reported preliminary indications that these mice had hearing defects lacking the Preyer reflex (21, 22). This is of particular interest in the context of polyamine metabolism because a drug, α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO, Eflornithine), that targets ornithine decarboxylase has been shown to cause occasional hearing loss in some patients (23–26). Although DFMO was ineffective for cancer treatment, it is an extremely promising agent for cancer chemoprevention (27, 28). When combined with sulindac, DFMO treatment produced a substantial reduction in the recurrence of colorectal adenomas in a large clinical trial (27). DFMO is a major drug for the treatment of African sleeping sickness caused by Trypanosoma brucei (29, 30). It is also used as a topically applied cream for treatment of unwanted facial hair in women (31, 32). DFMO is generally well tolerated even at high doses, but reversible hearing loss has been reported in multiple clinical trials (25, 33), and a rarer irreversible defect has also been reported (34). These side effects are not observed at lower doses of DFMO (26, 27).Ototoxicity has been demonstrated to occur in experimental animals treated with DFMO including rats (35), guinea pigs (36), gerbils (37), and mice (38). Using immunohistochemistry, a high level of ornithine decarboxylase was observed in the inner ear of the rat, with the highest in the organ of Corti and lateral wall followed by the cochlear nerve (39). Measurements of polyamines in the relevant structures are very difficult due to the small amount of tissue available, but as expected, DFMO treatment reduced polyamine levels and ornithine decarboxylase activity in the inner ear of the guinea pig (36). A plausible explanation for the importance of polyamines in auditory physiology is based on their well documented role as regulators of potassium channels (38). The inward rectification of Kir channels is caused by blockage of the outward current by polyamines (40–42). Studies of the cloned mouse cochlear lateral wall-specific Kir4.1 channel showed that inward rectification was reduced and that there was a marked reduction in endocochlear potential (EP). It was proposed that DFMO treatment increases the outward Kir4.1 current, resulting in a drop in EP (38).In the experiments reported here, we have studied in more detail the role of polyamines in auditory physiology using Gy mice and crosses of these mice with transgenic CAG/SpmS mice (43). These mice express spermine synthase under the control of a composite cytomegalovirus-IE enhancer/chicken β-actin promoter, which was designed to provide ubiquitous expression (44–46). Assays of the spermine synthase activity in CAG/SpmS line 8 confirmed that there was a high level of expression of the transgene in many different organs and that this level was maintained for at least 1 year (43). Our studies confirm that Gy mice are totally deaf and that this condition is reversed by the expression of the SpmS gene. These changes are due to a virtually complete loss of the EP in the Gy mice. We have also examined the effect of DFMO on the Gy mice. Unexpectedly, it was found that these mice show a rapid and profound toxicity to this drug, leading to death within a few days. Within 5 days of exposure to DFMO in the drinking water, the DFMO-treated mice suffered a catastrophic loss of balance due to inner ear effects. This toxicity was also prevented by the transgenic expression of spermine synthase in the Gy background.     

Aquaporin-2 in the ��-omics�� Era

Vasopressin controls renal water excretion largely through actions to regulate the water channel aquaporin-2 in collecting duct principal cells. Our knowledge of the mechanisms involved has increased markedly in recent years with the advent of methods for large-scale systems-level profiling such as protein mass spectrometry, yeast two-hybrid analysis, and oligonucleotide microarrays. Here we review this progress.Regulation of water excretion by the kidney is one of the most visible aspects of everyday physiology. An outdoor tennis game on a hot summer day can result in substantial water losses by sweating, and the kidneys respond by reducing water excretion. In contrast, excessive intake of water, a frequent occurrence in everyday life, results in excretion of copious amounts of clear urine. These responses serve to exact tight control on the tonicity of body fluids, maintaining serum osmolality in the range of 290–294 mosmol/kg of H₂O through the regulated return of water from the pro-urine in the renal collecting ducts to the bloodstream.The importance of this process is highlighted when the regulation fails. For example, polyuria (rapid uncontrolled excretion of water) is a sometimes devastating consequence of lithium therapy for bipolar disorder. On the other side of the coin are water balance disorders that result from excessive renal water retention causing systemic hypo-osmolality or hyponatremia. Hyponatremia due to excessive water retention can be seen with severe congestive heart failure, hepatic cirrhosis, and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis.The chief regulator of water excretion is the peptide hormone AVP,² whereas the chief molecular target for regulation is the water channel AQP2. In this minireview, we describe new progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in regulation of AQP2 by AVP in collecting duct cells, with emphasis on new information derived from “systems-level” approaches involving large-scale profiling and screening techniques such as oligonucleotide arrays, protein mass spectrometry, and yeast two-hybrid analysis. Most of the progress with these techniques is in the identification of individual molecules involved in AVP signaling and binding interactions with AQP2. Additional related issues are addressed in several recent reviews (1–4).     

An N-Glycosylation Site on the��-Propeller Domain of the Integrin ��5 Subunit Plays Key Roles in Both Its Function and Site-specific Modification by��1,4-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III

Recently we reported that N-glycans on the β-propeller domain of the integrin α5 subunit (S-3,4,5) are essential for α5β1 heterodimerization, expression, and cell adhesion. Herein to further investigate which N-glycosylation site is the most important for the biological function and regulation, we characterized the S-3,4,5 mutants in detail. We found that site-4 is a key site that can be specifically modified by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III). The introduction of bisecting GlcNAc into the S-3,4,5 mutant catalyzed by GnT-III decreased cell adhesion and migration on fibronectin, whereas overexpression of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V) promoted cell migration. The phenomenon is similar to previous observations that the functions of the wild-type α5 subunit were positively and negatively regulated by GnT-V and GnT-III, respectively, suggesting that the α5 subunit could be duplicated by the S-3,4,5 mutant. Interestingly GnT-III specifically modified the S-4,5 mutant but not the S-3,5 mutant. This result was confirmed by erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin lectin blot analysis. The reduction in cell adhesion was consistently observed in the S-4,5 mutant but not in the S-3,5 mutant cells. Furthermore mutation of site-4 alone resulted in a substantial decrease in erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin lectin staining and suppression of cell spread induced by GnT-III compared with that of either the site-3 single mutant or wild-type α5. These results, taken together, strongly suggest that N-glycosylation of site-4 on the α5 subunit is the most important site for its biological functions. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that site-specific modification of N-glycans by a glycosyltransferase results in functional regulation.Glycosylation is a crucial post-translational modification of most secreted and cell surface proteins (1). Glycosylation is involved in a variety of physiological and pathological events, including cell growth, migration, differentiation, and tumor invasion. It is well known that glycans play important roles in cell-cell communication, intracellular signal transduction, protein folding, and stability (2, 3).Integrins comprise a family of receptors that are important for cell adhesion. The major function of integrins is to connect cells to the extracellular matrix, activate intracellular signaling pathways, and regulate cytoskeletal formation (4). Integrin α5β1 is well known as a fibronectin (FN)³ receptor. The interaction between integrin α5 and FN is essential for cell migration, cell survival, and development (5–8). In addition, integrins are N-glycan carrier proteins. For example, α5β1 integrin contains 14 and 12 putative N-glycosylation sites on the α5 and β1 subunits, respectively. Several studies suggest that N-glycosylation is essential for functional integrin α5β1. When human fibroblasts were cultured in the presence of 1-deoxymannojirimycin, which prevents N-linked oligosaccharide processing, immature α5β1 integrin appeared on the cell surface, and FN-dependent adhesion was greatly reduced (9). Treatment of purified integrin α5β1 with N-glycosidase F, which cleaves between the innermost N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and asparagine N-glycan residues of N-linked glycoproteins, prevented the inherent association between subunits and blocked α5β1 binding to FN (10).A growing body of evidence indicates that the presence of the appropriate oligosaccharide can modulate integrin activation. N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III) catalyzes the addition of GlcNAc to mannose that is β1,4-linked to an underlying N-acetylglucosamine, producing what is known as a “bisecting” GlcNAc linkage as shown in Fig. 1B. GnT-III is generally regarded as a key glycosyltransferase in N-glycan biosynthetic pathways and contributes to inhibition of metastasis. The introduction of a bisecting GlcNAc catalyzed by GnT-III suppresses additional processing and elongation of N-glycans. These reactions, which are catalyzed in vitro by other glycosyltransferases, such as N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V), which catalyzes the formation of β1,6 GlcNAc branching structures (Fig. 1B) and plays important roles in tumor metastasis, do not proceed because the enzymes cannot utilize the bisected N-glycans as a substrate. Introduction of the bisecting GlcNAc to integrin α5 by overexpression of GnT-III resulted in decreased in ligand binding and down-regulation of cell adhesion and migration (11–13). Contrary to the functions of GnT-III, overexpression of GnT-V promoted integrin α5β1-mediated cell migration on FN (14). These observations clearly demonstrate that the alteration of N-glycan structure affected the biological functions of integrin α5β1. Similarly characterization of the carbohydrate moieties in integrin α3β1 from non-metastatic and metastatic human melanoma cell lines showed that expression of β1,6 GlcNAc branched structures was higher in metastatic cells compared with non-metastatic cells, confirming the notion that the β1,6 GlcNAc branched structure confers invasive and metastatic properties to cancer cells. In fact, Partridge et al. (15) reported that GnT-V-modified N-glycans containing poly-N-acetyllactosamine, the preferred ligand for galectin-3, on surface receptors oppose their constitutive endocytosis, promoting intracellular signaling and consequently cell migration and tumor metastasis.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Potential N-glycosylation sites on the α5 subunit and its modification by GnT-III and GnT-V. A, schematic diagram of potential N-glycosylation sites on the α5 subunit. Putative N-glycosylation sites are indicated by triangles, and point mutations are indicated by crosses (N84Q, N182Q, N297Q, N307Q, N316Q, N524Q, N530Q, N593Q, N609Q, N675Q, N712Q, N724Q, N773Q, and N868Q). B, illustration of the reaction catalyzed by GnT-III and GnT-V. Square, GlcNAc; circle, mannose. TM, transmembrane domain.In addition, sialylation on the non-reducing terminus of N-glycans of α5β1 integrin plays an important role in cell adhesion. Colon adenocarcinomas express elevated levels of α2,6 sialylation and increased activity of ST6GalI sialyltransferase. Elevated ST6GalI positively correlated with metastasis and poor survival. Therefore, ST6GalI-mediated hypersialylation likely plays a role in colorectal tumor invasion (16, 17). In fact, oncogenic ras up-regulated ST6GalI and, in turn, increased sialylation of β1 integrin adhesion receptors in colon epithelial cells (18). However, this is not always the case. The expression of hyposialylated integrin α5β1 was induced by phorbol esterstimulated differentiation in myeloid cells in which the expression of the ST6GalI was down-regulated by the treatment, increasing FN binding (19). A similar phenomenon was also observed in hematopoietic or other epithelial cells. In these cells, the increased sialylation of the β1 integrin subunit was correlated with reduced adhesiveness and metastatic potential (20–22). In contrast, the enzymatic removal of α2,8-linked oligosialic acids from the α5 integrin subunit inhibited cell adhesion to FN (23). Collectively these findings suggest that the interaction of integrin α5β1 with FN is dependent on its N-glycosylation and the processing status of N-glycans.Because integrin α5β1 contains multipotential N-glycosylation sites, it is important to determine the sites that are crucial for its biological function and regulation. Recently we found that N-glycans on the β-propeller domain (sites 3, 4, and 5) of the integrin α5 subunit are essential for α5β1 heterodimerization, cell surface expression, and biological function (24). In this study, to further investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of GnT-III-regulated biological functions, we characterized the N-glycans on the α5 subunit in detail using genetic and biochemical approaches and found that site-4 is a key site that can be specifically modified by GnT-III.     

SDF2L1, a Component of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone Complex, Differentially Interacts with ��-, ��-, and ��-Defensin Propeptides

Mammalian defensins are cationic antimicrobial peptides that play a central role in host innate immunity and as regulators of acquired immunity. In animals, three structural defensin subfamilies, designated as α, β, and θ, have been characterized, each possessing a distinctive tridisulfide motif. Mature α- and β-defensins are produced by simple proteolytic processing of their prepropeptide precursors. In contrast, the macrocyclic θ-defensins are formed by the head-to-tail splicing of nonapeptides excised from a pair of prepropeptide precursors. Thus, elucidation of the θ-defensin biosynthetic pathway provides an opportunity to identify novel factors involved in this unique process. We incorporated the θ-defensin precursor, proRTD1a, into a bait construct for a yeast two-hybrid screen that identified rhesus macaque stromal cell-derived factor 2-like protein 1 (SDF2L1), as an interactor. SDF2L1 is a component of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone complex, which we found to also interact with α- and β-defensins. However, analysis of the SDF2L1 domain requirements for binding of representative α-, β-, and θ-defensins revealed that α- and β-defensins bind SDF2L1 similarly, but differently from the interactions that mediate binding of SDF2L1 to pro-θ-defensins. Thus, SDF2L1 is a factor involved in processing and/or sorting of all three defensin subfamilies.Mammalian defensins are tridisulfide-containing antimicrobial peptides that contribute to innate immunity in all species studied to date. Defensins are comprised of three structural subfamilies: the α-, β-, and θ-defensins (1). α- and β-Defensins are peptides of about 29–45-amino acid residues with similar three-dimensional structures. Despite their similar tertiary conformations, the disulfide motifs of α- and β-defensins differ. Expression of human α-defensins is tissue-specific. Four myeloid α-defensins (HNP1–4) are expressed predominantly by neutrophils and monocytes wherein they are packaged in granules, while two enteric α-defensins (HD-5 and HD-6) are expressed at high levels in Paneth cells of the small intestine. Myeloid α-defensins constitute about 5% of the protein mass of human neutrophils. HNPs are discharged into the phagosome during phagocytic ingestion of microbial particles. HD-5 and HD-6 are produced and stored as propeptides in Paneth cell granules and are processed extracellularly by intestinal trypsin (2). β-Defensins are produced primarily by various epithelia (e.g. skin, urogenital tract, airway) and are secreted by the producing cells in their mature forms. In contrast to pro-α-defensins, which contain a conserved prosegment of ∼40 amino acids, the prosegments in β-defensins vary in length and sequence. θ-Defensins are found only in Old World monkeys and orangutans and are the only known circular peptides in animals. These 18-residue macrocyclic peptides are formed by ligation of two nonamer sequences excised from two precursor polypeptides, which are truncated versions of ancestral α-defensins. Like myeloid α-defensins, θ-defensins are stored primarily in neutrophil and monocyte granules (3).Numerous laboratories have demonstrated that the antimicrobial properties of defensins derive from their ability to bind and disrupt target cell membranes (4), and studies have shown defensins to be active against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria (5), viruses (6–9), fungi (10, 11), and parasites such as Giardia lamblia (12). Defensins also play a regulatory role in acquired immunity as they are known to chemoattract T lymphocytes, monocytes, and immature dendritic cells (13, 14), act as adjuvants, stimulate B cell responses, and up-regulate proliferation and cytokine production by spleen cells and T helper cells (15, 16).Defensins are produced as pre-propeptides and undergo post-translational processing to form the mature peptides. While much has been learned about regulation of defensin expression, little is known about the factors involved in their biosynthesis. Valore and Ganz (17) investigated the processing of defensins in cultured cells and demonstrated that maturation of HNPs occurs through two proteolytic steps that lead to formation of mature α-defensins, but the proteases involved have yet to be identified. Moreover, there are virtually no published data regarding endoplasmic reticulum (ER)² factors that are responsible for the folding, processing, and sorting steps necessary for defensin maturation and secretion or trafficking to the proper subcellular compartment. It is likely that several chaperones, proteases, and protein-disulfide isomerase (PDI) family proteins are involved. Consistent with this possibility, Gruber et al. (18) recently demonstrated the role of a PDI in biosynthesis of cyclotides, small ∼30-residue macrocyclic peptides produced by plants.The primary structures of α- and θ-defensin precursors are closely related. We therefore undertook studies to identify proteins that interact with representative propeptides of each defensin subfamily with the goal of determining common and unique processes that regulate biosynthesis of α- and θ-defensins. We used two-hybrid analysis to first identify interactors of the θ-defensin precursor, proRTD1a. As described, we identified SDF2L1, a component of the ER-chaperone complex as an interactor, and showed that it also specifically interacts with α- and β-defensins. This suggests that SDF2L1 is involved in the maturation/trafficking of defensins at a step common to all three subfamilies of mammalian defensins.     

The Novel S527F Mutation in the Integrin ��3 Chain Induces a High Affinity ��IIb��3 Receptor by Hindering Adoption of the Bent Conformation

Three heterozygous mutations were identified in the genes encoding platelet integrin receptor αIIbβ3 in a patient with an ill defined platelet disorder: one in the β3 gene (S527F) and two in the αIIb gene (R512W and L841M). Five stable Chinese hamster ovary cell lines were constructed expressing recombinant αIIbβ3 receptors bearing the individual R512W, L841M, or S527F mutation; both the R512W and L841M mutations; or all three mutations. All receptors were expressed on the cell surface, and mutations R512W and L841M had no effect on integrin function. Interestingly, the β3 S527F mutation produced a constitutively active receptor. Indeed, both fibrinogen and the ligand-mimetic antibody PAC-1 bound to non-activated αIIbβ3 receptors carrying the S527F mutation, indicating that the conformation of this receptor was altered and corresponded to the high affinity ligand binding state. In addition, the conformational change induced by S527F was evident from basal anti-ligand-induced binding site antibody binding to the receptor. A molecular model bearing this mutation was constructed based on the crystal structure of αIIbβ3 and revealed that the S527F mutation, situated in the third integrin epidermal growth factor-like (I-EGF3) domain, hindered the αIIbβ3 receptor from adopting a wild type-like bent conformation. Movement of I-EGF3 into a cleft in the bent conformation may be hampered both by steric hindrance between Phe⁵²⁷ in β3 and the calf-1 domain in αIIb and by decreased flexibility between I-EGF2 and I-EGF3.The platelet receptor αIIbβ3 belongs to the family of integrin receptors that consist of noncovalently linked α/β-heterodimers. They are cell-surface receptors that play a role in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Under resting conditions, integrin receptors adopt the low affinity conformation and do not interact with their ligands. Inside-out signaling turns the receptor into a high affinity conformation capable of ligand binding. Ligand binding itself induces additional conformational changes resulting in exposure of neoantigenic sites called ligand-induced binding sites (LIBS)³ and generates in turn outside-in signaling, which triggers a range of downstream signals (1, 2).Integrin αIIbβ3 is expressed on platelets and megakaryocytes. In flowing blood under resting conditions, αIIbβ3 does not interact with its ligand fibrinogen. When a blood vessel is damaged, platelets adhere at sites of vascular injury and become activated. As a consequence, αIIbβ3 adopts the high affinity conformation and binds fibrinogen. This results in platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, which eventually will stop the bleeding (3).The topology of integrins comprises an extracellular, globular, N-terminal ligand-binding head domain (the β-propeller domain in the αIIb chain and the βI domain in the β3 chain) standing on two long legs or stalks (consisting of thigh, calf-1, and calf-2 domains in the αIIb chain and hybrid, plexin/semaphorin/integrin (PSI), four integrin endothelial growth factor-like (I-EGF), and β-tail domains in the β3 chain), followed by transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains (1, 2). X-ray crystal structures of the extracellular domain of non-activated αVβ3 revealed that the legs are severely bent, putting the head domain next to the membrane-proximal portions of the legs (4, 5). The bending occurs between I-EGF1 and I-EGF2 in the β-subunit and between the thigh and calf-1 domains in the α-subunit. This bent conformation represents the low affinity state of the receptor. The high affinity state of the receptor is induced by activation and is associated with a large-scale conformational rearrangement in which the integrin extends with a switchblade-like motion (2). Recently, the crystal structure of the entire extracellular domain of αIIbβ3 in its low affinity conformation was resolved and revealed that this integrin also adopts the bent conformation under resting conditions (6). Structural rearrangements in αIIbβ3 between the bent and extended conformations are similar to what has been reported for other integrins (7).We report here that the S527F mutation in the I-EGF3 region of the β3 polypeptide chain of the αIIbβ3 receptor induces a constitutively active receptor adopting an extended high affinity conformation. This was evidenced by spontaneous PAC-1, fibrinogen, and anti-LIBS antibody binding. These data were further corroborated by modeling the replacement of Ser⁵²⁷ with Phe in the crystal structure of the extracellular domain of αIIbβ3. In this model, the S527F mutation decreases the flexibility of I-EGF3 and appears to prevent movement of the lower β-leg into the cleft between the upper β-leg and the lower α-leg. As a consequence, formation of the bent conformation of the non-activated receptor is hampered.