Strategies for breast cancer therapy with antiestrogens

Current clinical research is focused upon the application of adjuvant therapy for the treatment of breast cancer. Combination chemotherapy is the most successful adjuvant therapy for premenopausal patients whereas the antiestrogen tamoxifen (1 or 2 yr) is successful in postmenopausal disease. We have developed a unifying strategy for the treatment of breast cancer. The thesis is based upon the application of continuous adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen in a low estrogen environment. Chemotherapy causes a chemical castration in premenopausal patients. In contrast, tamoxifen causes an increase in steroidogenesis. A combination of both approaches will work against each other until ovarian failure occurs. Patients should be checked for castration to provide a low estrogen environment in which tamoxifen, a competitive antagonist of estrogen action, can effectively work. Laboratory evidence using carcinogen-induced rat mammary tumor models demonstrates the efficacy of long-term therapy. Studies with the human breast cell line MCF-7 grown in athymic mice show that tamoxifen is a tumoristatic agent so that once the therapy is stopped, tumors can be regrown by estrogen administration. Patients should receive continuous tamoxifen therapy to prevent the growth-stimulating effects of adrenal steroids, environmental and phyto-estrogens.     

Aromatase inhibitors for therapy of advanced breast cancer

In postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, numerous phase III trials have been performed comparing the third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NS-AIs) anastrozole and letrozole and the steroidal AI (S-AI) exemestane in the “first-line” setting against tamoxifen and in the “second-line” setting against megestrol acetate. In both settings, the AIs were at least as efficacious or superior in some endpoints with a preferable toxicity profile including a lower incidence of thrombotic events. Relatively small differences in potency between the three AIs have been identified and it has not been demonstrated that these differences have clinical implications. The recent establishment of the value of AIs in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal women will impact on their utilization in advanced disease. In premenopausal women the third-generation AIs have not been studied as monotherapy and there is a paucity of data in combination with ovarian function suppression in the advanced disease setting. The main area of future investigations for the AIs in premenopausal women will be in the adjuvant therapy setting in combination with suppression of ovarian function.     

IPI59: An Actionable Biomarker to Improve Treatment Response in Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Patients

Despite improvements in operative management and therapies, overall survival rates in advanced ovarian cancer have remained largely unchanged over the past three decades. Although it is possible to identify high-risk patients following surgery, the knowledge does not provide information about the genomic aberrations conferring risk, or the implications for treatment. To address these challenges, we developed an integrative pathway-index model and applied it to messenger RNA expression from 458 patients with serous ovarian carcinoma from the Cancer Genome Atlas project. The biomarker derived from this approach, IPI59, contains 59 genes from six pathways. As we demonstrate using independent datasets from six studies, IPI59 is strongly associated with overall and progression-free survival, and also identifies high-risk patients who may benefit from enhanced adjuvant therapy.     

Benefit with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting for postmenopausal women with breast cancer

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, have been shown to be effective both as alternatives to tamoxifen in first-line treatment of hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women and following failure of first-line tamoxifen for endocrine therapy. These 3 agents are now being investigated as adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer, as alternative or complementary treatments to the standard, tamoxifen. Three treatment strategies are under investigation: replacement of tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for 5 years (early adjuvant therapy), sequencing of tamoxifen before or after an aromatase inhibitor during the first 5 years (early sequential adjuvant therapy), or following 5 years of tamoxifen (extended adjuvant therapy). In the first adjuvant trial (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination [ATAC]), anastrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in reducing risk of disease recurrence, and recently, the Breast International Group (BIG) trial BIG 1-98 demonstrated the significant superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen in improving disease-free survival. A large trial (International Collaborative Cancer Group [ICCG] trial 96) investigated sequencing of 2 to 3 years of exemestane after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen and found that switching to exemestane was significantly superior in disease-free survival compared with continuing on tamoxifen. The Arimidex or Nolvadex (ARNO) and the small ITA (Italian Tamoxifen Arimidex) trials similarly sequenced anastrozole after tamoxifen and also found that sequencing reduced the hazard of recurrence compared with remaining on tamoxifen. Trial MA.17 evaluated extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole vs placebo following 5 years of tamoxifen. Disease-free survival was significantly improved with letrozole vs placebo, irrespective of whether patients had lymph node-positive or node-negative tumors. All 3 aromatase inhibitors were generally well tolerated. Results of these trials indicate that aromatase inhibitors provide important benefits relative to tamoxifen in each of these adjuvant treatment settings, but the optimal approach still needs to be defined. Other trials continue to investigate some of these adjuvant treatment strategies.     

The Promher Study: An Observational Italian Study on Adjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive,pT1a-b pN0 Breast Cancer

BackgroundThe management of pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer is controversial and no data about the efficacy of trastuzumab in this setting are available from randomized clinical trials. The aims of this retrospective study were to assess how patients are managed in clinical practice in Italy, which clinical or biological characteristics influenced the choice of adjuvant systemic therapy and the outcome of patients.MethodsData of consecutive patients who underwent surgery from January 2007 to December 2012 for HER2-positive, pT1a-b pN0 M0 breast cancer were retrospectively collected from 28 Italian centres. Analysis of contingency tables and multivariate generalized logit models were used to investigate the association between the baseline clinical and biological features and the treatment strategy adopted.ResultsAmong 303 enrolled patients, 204 received adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab, 65 adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab and 34 did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy. At the multivariate analysis age, tumor size, proliferation index and hormone receptor status were significantly associated with the treatment choice. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) probability was 95%, 94.3% and 69.6% for patients treated with adjuvant systemic therapy and trastuzumab, with adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab and for patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, respectively (p<0.001).ConclusionsThe majority of patients (66%) with pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer enrolled in this retrospective study received adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab, whereas only 11% patients did not receive any adjuvant systemic therapy. The choice of treatment type seems to be mainly influenced by tumor size, proliferation index, hormone receptor status and age. The 5-year DFS probability was significantly higher for patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab compared with patients not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy or receiving adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab.     

Role of adjuvants in inhibitory influence of immunization with porcine zona pellucida antigen (ZP-3) on ovarian folliculogenesis in bonnet monkeys: a morphological study

Female bonnet monkeys were immunized with 55 kDa porcine zona antigen (ZP-3), with either complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) or sodium phthalylated lipopolysaccharide (SPLPS) as adjuvant. Anti-ZP-3 antibody titers were monitored and the effect of immunization on the ovarian morphology was assessed by high-resolution light microscopy. The study demonstrated that both adjuvants used were equally potent in eliciting antibody response against ZP-3. Although no morphological damage to ovarian components was observed in animals immunized with SPLPS as adjuvant, immunization using CFA resulted in profound ovarian follicular atrophy, sparing only the primordial follicles. The atrophic phenomenon involved those follicles that either already had or were in the process of forming zona pellucida. The results of this study indicate that choice of adjuvant may be an important consideration for immunization against zona antigens. These findings encourage further investigations for developing better immunization regimen aimed at using zona antigens for immunocontraception.     

Machine-learning aided in situ drug sensitivity screening predicts treatment outcomes in ovarian PDX tumors

Long-term treatment outcomes for patients with high grade ovarian cancers have not changed despite innovations in therapies. There is no recommended assay for predicting patient response to second-line therapy, thus clinicians must make treatment decisions based on each individual patient. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors have been shown to predict drug sensitivity in ovarian cancer patients, but the time frame for intraperitoneal (IP) tumor generation, expansion, and drug screening is beyond that for tumor recurrence and platinum resistance to occur, thus results do not have clinical utility. We describe a drug sensitivity screening assay using a drug delivery microdevice implanted for 24 h in subcutaneous (SQ) ovarian PDX tumors to predict treatment outcomes in matched IP PDX tumors in a clinically relevant time frame. The SQ tumor response to local microdose drug exposure was found to be predictive of the growth of matched IP tumors after multi-week systemic therapy using significantly fewer animals (10 SQ vs 206 IP). Multiplexed immunofluorescence image analysis of phenotypic tumor response combined with a machine learning classifier could predict IP treatment outcomes against three second-line cytotoxic therapies with an average AUC of 0.91.     

Endocrine approaches for the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Preventing clinical progression is the major treatment goal for both early and advanced breast cancer. For hormone-responsive cases (about 70% of the total), this can necessitate the use of sequential hormone therapies at various points during the patient's life. Newer hormonal therapies, such as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, are now competing with tamoxifen as first choice endocrine therapy in breast cancer. In addition, a further non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole has been shown to be beneficial when given at completion of 5 years adjuvant tamoxifen. In light of these new data, current treatment paradigms need to be reviewed. Already well established as second-line treatments for advanced breast cancer, the improved risk:benefit profiles of anastrozole and letrozole compared with tamoxifen mean that these agents are now also recognised alternative treatments in the first-line relapse setting. More recent studies demonstrate that anastrozole may also have an improved risk:benefit profile compared with tamoxifen when used as initial adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer. Anastrozole is also being evaluated as a preventative treatment in women at high risk of developing breast cancer. A new addition to the endocrine treatment armamentarium is the oestrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant, which, unlike tamoxifen, has no agonist effects. Fulvestrant is at least as effective as anastrozole in the second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer, and provides similar benefits to tamoxifen when used as first-line therapy in patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive tumours.     

Ovarian Failure and the Menopause

Long-term replacement therapy for ovarian deficiency or failure, including the menopause, has been widely debated. In the past, treatment, if indicated, was reassurance, sedation, and occasionally short-term estrogen therapy. Today, because of recent advances in steroid synthesis, the consequences of ovarian deficiency may be preventable.Ovarian function and failure are discussed, the apparent physiological renaissance of nine patients documented, and the methods of treatment detailed. Thirty-three patients, who took part in this program during the past two years, have continued treatment with enthusiasm, without major problems in management, and have shown evidence of improved physical and emotional well-being.Further unbiased long-term research, possibly using modern computer technique, is needed to decide between traditional and replacement therapy for the menopause.     

Tumor-biological factors uPA and PAI-1 as stratification criteria of a multicenter adjuvant chemotherapy trial in node-negative breast cancer

In axillary node-negative primary breast cancer, 70% of the patients will be cured by locoregional treatment alone. Therefore, adjuvant systemic therapy is only needed for those 30% of node-negative patients who will relapse after primary therapy and eventually die of metastases. Traditional histomorphological and clinical factors do not provide sufficient information to allow accurate risk group assessment in order to identify node-negative patients who might benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. In the last decade various groups have reported a strong and statistically independent prognostic impact of the serine protease uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator) and its inhibitor PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1) in node-negative breast cancer patients. Based on these data, a prospective multicenter therapy trial in node-negative breast cancer patients was started in Germany in June 1993, supported by the German Research Association (DFG). Axillary node-negative breast cancer patients with high levels of either or both proteolytic factors in the tumor tissue were randomized to adjuvant CMF chemotherapy versus observation only. Recruitment was continued until the end of 1998, by which time 684 patients had been enrolled. Since then, patients have been followed up in order to assess the value of uPA and PAI-1 determination as an adequate selection criterion for adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative breast cancer patients. This paper reports on the rationale and design of this prospective multicenter clinical trial, which may have an impact on future policies in prognosis-oriented treatment strategies.     

Future uses for aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer

Over recent years highly potent, well-tolerated aromatase inhibitors have been developed, which essentially obliterate peripheral aromatase activity in postmenopausal women. Their role as the optimal second-line agents (post-tamoxifen) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer has recently been established in large comparative clinical trials. Their testing as adjuvant therapy is warranted, but their eventual application in this (or the prophylactic) setting will be dependent on the currently unknown effects of profound oestrogen deprivation on the physiology of postmenopausal women as well as on its efficacy. It is also possible that these new compounds could suppress oestrogen synthesis in premenopausal women, but the consequences on ovarian folliculogenesis might prevent their widespread use in this group of patients.     

Multi-gene expression predictors of single drug responses to adjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian carcinoma: predicting platinum resistance

Despite advances in radical surgery and chemotherapy delivery, ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Standard therapy includes treatment with platinum-based combination chemotherapies yet there is no biomarker model to predict their responses to these agents. We here have developed and independently tested our multi-gene molecular predictors for forecasting patients' responses to individual drugs on a cohort of 55 ovarian cancer patients. To independently validate these molecular predictors, we performed microarray profiling on FFPE tumor samples of 55 ovarian cancer patients (UVA-55) treated with platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Genome-wide chemosensitivity biomarkers were initially discovered from the in vitro drug activities and genomic expression data for carboplatin and paclitaxel, respectively. Multivariate predictors were trained with the cell line data and then evaluated with a historical patient cohort. For the UVA-55 cohort, the carboplatin, taxol, and combination predictors significantly stratified responder patients and non-responder patients (p = 0.019, 0.04, 0.014) with sensitivity = 91%, 96%, 93 and NPV = 57%, 67%, 67% in pathologic clinical response. The combination predictor also demonstrated a significant survival difference between predicted responders and non-responders with a median survival of 55.4 months vs. 32.1 months. Thus, COXEN single- and combination-drug predictors successfully stratified platinum resistance and taxane response in an independent cohort of ovarian cancer patients based on their FFPE tumor samples.     

Ovarian irradiation and prednisone therapy following surgery and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the breast.

Following mastectomy, patients with operable breast cancer underwent postoperative irradiation of the chest wall and regional lymph nodes. They were then assigned at random to receive no further therapy, ovarian irradiation (2000 rads in 5 days) or ovarian irradiation in the same dosage plus prednisone, 7.5 mg daily. A total of 705 patients received the randomly assigned treatment and were followed for up to 10 years. In premenopausal patients who received ovarian irradiation the recurrence of breast cancer was delayed and survival prolonged, but not significantly. In premenopausal women aged 45 years or more ovarian irradiation plus prednisone therapy significantly delayed the recurrence of breast cancer (P = 0.02) and prolonged survival (P = 0.02); the survival expectancy of these patients was similar to that of the general population of the same age from the third year after the cancer operation. No value was demonstrated for ovarian irradiation with or without prednisone therapy in postmenopausal patients.     

Electrical neuromodulation for patients with cardiac diseases

In this review we discuss the position of electrical neuromodulation as a safe and reversible adjuvant therapy for treatment of patients with chronic cardiac diseases who have become refractory to conventional strategies. In patients with chronic refractory angina, electrical neuromodulation, independent of the applied modality, has shown to reduce complaints of angina, to enhance exercise capacity, to improve quality of life and to employ anti-ischaemic effects. To date, electrical neuromodulation seems to be one of the best adjuvant therapies for these patients. In addition, neuromodulation in the treatment of heart failure and resistant arrhythmias is the subject of several ongoing studies.     

Survival among clinical stage I–III rectal cancer patients treated with different preoperative treatments: A population-based comparison

BackgroundRadical resection is regarded as the cornerstone of rectal cancer treatment. Preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy are often administered. This population-based study compares the survival in clinical stage I–III rectal cancer patients who received either preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative chemoradiotherapy or no preoperative therapy. As secondary research questions, the association of type of radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival is also investigated.MethodsPatients diagnosed between January 2006 and December 2011 with stage I–III rectal adenocarcinoma were retrieved from the Belgian Cancer Registry database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to evaluate the association of preoperative treatment, type of radical resection and use of adjuvant chemotherapy with survival, adjusting for the baseline characteristics age, gender, WHO performance status and clinical stage.ResultsA total of 5173 rectal cancer patients were identified. Preoperative treatment was as follows: none in 1354 (26.2%), radiotherapy in 797 (15.4%) and chemoradiotherapy in 3022 (58.4%) patients. The patient group who did not receive preoperative therapy or radiotherapy followed by radical resection had a lower observed survival compared to the patient group receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The patient groups who underwent abdominoperineal excision and those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had a worse observed survival compared to the patient group treated with sphincter-sparing surgery and no adjuvant therapy respectively. These effects were age-dependent. Multivariable analysis demonstrated similar findings for the observed survival conditional on surviving the first year since surgery.ConclusionIn this population-based study among clinical stage I–III rectal cancer patients treated with radical resection, a superior observed survival was noticed in the patient group receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy compared to the patients groups receiving no or preoperative radiotherapy only, adjusting for case mix, type of radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, higher adjusted observed survival was also detected for the patient groups with sphincter-sparing surgery or no adjuvant chemotherapy.     

卵巢癌生物治疗的现状与进展

由于卵巢癌的早期临床症状较不明显,大部分患者就诊时就处于晚期阶段,这对其有效治疗造成了很大困难,使其成为妇科病死率最高的恶性肿瘤,一直广受关注。但目前传统的手术与放化疗方法的治疗效果不佳。近年来随着基础研究工作的不断发展与深入,生物治疗作为新的肿瘤治疗方法引起了人们的重视。生物治疗作为第四种卵巢癌的治疗模式,其采取的针对不同靶位点和靶途径的策略很大程度上促进了卵巢癌治疗的理论和实践研究。生物治疗主要是运用基因治疗、免疫治疗和重组病毒治疗的方法对患者进行治疗,基因治疗包括细胞毒性或自杀基因治疗、纠错性基因治疗、免疫增强性基因治疗和抗肿瘤血管生成基因治疗等。而免疫治疗又分为主动和被动免疫治疗,前者包括树突状细胞疫苗、自体肿瘤疫苗和分子疫苗治疗等,后者如细胞因子治疗、单克隆抗体拮抗治疗以及细胞过继免疫治疗等。上述目前在卵巢癌治疗研究中已取得了一些成果,本文就其卵巢癌的生物治疗现状与进展做一综述。     

PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: Sensitivity prediction and resistance mechanisms

Poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have provided great clinical benefits to ovarian cancer patients. To date, three PARP inhibitors, namely, olaparib, rucaparib and niraparib have been approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer in the United States. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and platinum sensitivity are prospective biomarkers for predicting the response to PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancers. Preclinical data have focused on identifying the gene aberrations that might generate HRD and induce sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in vitro in cancer cell lines or in vivo in patient‐derived xenografts. Clinical trials have focused on genomic scar analysis to identify biomarkers for predicting the response to PARP inhibitors. Additionally, researchers have aimed to investigate mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors and strategies to overcome this resistance. Combining PARP inhibitors with HR pathway inhibitors to extend the utility of PARP inhibitors to BRCA‐proficient tumours is increasingly foreseeable. Identifying the population of patients with the greatest potential benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy and the circumstances under which patients are no longer suited for PARP inhibitor therapy are important. Further studies are required in order to propose better strategies for overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancers.     

Interferon therapy in neoplastic diseases

Three types of interferon preparation (alpha, beta and gamma) have been used in the treatment of tumours in vivo. At the time of writing no information is available on IFN-gamma treatment of tumour patients. Treatments with IFN-alpha and IFN-beta have been undertaken at many clinical centres. Both types of preparation can exert side effects. Both types have also been able to cause regression of certain tumours in individual patients. At our hospital, IFN-alpha has been given to tumour patients over the last decade. Antitumour effects have been registered on patients with juvenile laryngeal papillomatosis, Hodgkin's disease, myelomatosis, ovarian carcinoma, hypernephroma and glioblastoma. Further study is needed on how therapy with IFN should best be undertaken and also how such treatment compares with other treatments of various tumour diseases. IFN therapy should also be combined with other such treatments.     

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Postoperative treatments for lung cancer have been evaluated for more than two decades, but in the majority of the studies (especially until 1990) no significant effect on survival has been shown. In 1995, a meta-analysis of eight cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy trials with NSCLC showed a 13% reduction in the risk of death (P=0.08) and 5% benefit in 5-year survival. Among four positive trials (IALT, JBR10, ANITA and CALGB study) the absolute increase in the 5-year survival rates by adjuvant chemotherapy ranged from 4% to 15%, and the hazard ratios for death ranged from 0.6 to 0.86. The author analyzes the most important studies. Conclusion: adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of NSCLC can be considered as a new standard of care in patients with good performance status. Patients should receive 4 cycles of platina-based chemotherapy beginning 4-8 weeks after surgery. Future perspectives: optimization of chemotherapy regimens including targeted therapy (such as EGFR inhibitors, angiogenesis inhibitors, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies). Further progress is anticipated through the integration of chemopreventive agents into the adjuvant treatment.     

Locally advanced duodenal gangliocytic paraganglioma treated with adjuvant radiation therapy: case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Gangliocytic paraganglioma are rare neoplasms that predominantly arise in periampulary region. Though considered benign the disease can spread to regional lymphatics. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49 year old woman presented with melena and was found to have a periampullary mass. Endoscopic evaluation and biopsy demonstrated a periampullary paraganglioma. The tumor was resected with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and was found to represent a gangliocytic paraganglioma associated with nodal metastases. In a controversial decision, the patient was treated with adjuvant external beam radiation therapy. She is alive and well one year following resection. The authors have reviewed the current literature pertaining to this entity and have discussed the biologic behavior of the tumor as well as the rationale for treatment strategies employed. CONCLUSION: Paraganglioma is a rare tumor that typically resides in the gastrointestinal tract and demonstrates low malignant potential. Due to rarity of the disease there is no consensus on the adjuvant treatment even though nearly 5% of the lesions demonstrate the malignant potential.