Optimization of Data-Dependent Acquisition Parameters for Coupling High-Speed Separations with LC-MS/MS for Protein Identifications

Recent developments in chromatography, such as ultra-HPLC and superficially porous particles, offer significantly improved peptide separation. The narrow peak widths, often only several seconds, can permit a 15-min liquid chromatography run to have a similar peak capacity as a 60-min run using traditional HPLC approaches. In theory, these larger peak capacities should provide higher protein coverage and/or more protein identifications when incorporated into a proteomic workflow. We initially observed a decrease in protein coverage when implementing these faster chromatographic approaches, due to data-dependent acquisition (DDA) settings that were not properly set to match the narrow peak widths resulting from newly implemented, fast separation techniques. Oversampling of high-intensity peptides lead to low protein-sequence coverage, and tandem mass spectra (MS/MS) from lower-intensity peptides were of poor quality, as automated MS/MS events were occurring late on chromatographic peaks. These observations led us to optimize DDA settings to use these fast separations. Optimized DDA settings were applied to the analysis of Trypanosome brucei peptides, yielding peptide identifications at a rate almost five times faster than previously used methodologies. The described approach significantly improves protein identification workflows that use typical available instrumentation.     

ComplexBrowser: A Tool for Identification and Quantification of Protein Complexes in Large-scale Proteomics Datasets

1. Download : Download high-res image (53KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

• •Automated analysis of protein complexes in proteomic experiments.
• •Quantitative measurement of the coordinated changes in protein complex components.
• •Interactive visualizations for exploratory analysis of proteomic results.

     

Bayesian Confidence Intervals for Multiplexed Proteomics Integrate Ion-statistics with Peptide Quantification Concordance,

1. Download : Download high-res image (74KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

• •Bayesian Beta-Binomial model integrates ion statistics with peptide ratio agreement.
• •Model appropriately interprets information from low signal peptides.
• •Confidence can be assigned even without replicates.
• •Model adds sensitivity to detection of small changes.

     

Determining Protein Complex Connectivity Using a Probabilistic Deletion Network Derived from Quantitative Proteomics

Protein complexes are key molecular machines executing a variety of essential cellular processes. Despite the availability of genome-wide protein-protein interaction studies, determining the connectivity between proteins within a complex remains a major challenge. Here we demonstrate a method that is able to predict the relationship of proteins within a stable protein complex. We employed a combination of computational approaches and a systematic collection of quantitative proteomics data from wild-type and deletion strain purifications to build a quantitative deletion-interaction network map and subsequently convert the resulting data into an interdependency-interaction model of a complex. We applied this approach to a data set generated from components of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rpd3 histone deacetylase complexes, which consists of two distinct small and large complexes that are held together by a module consisting of Rpd3, Sin3 and Ume1. The resulting representation reveals new protein-protein interactions and new submodule relationships, providing novel information for mapping the functional organization of a complex.     

Increased Power for the Analysis of Label-free LC-MS/MS Proteomics Data by Combining Spectral Counts and Peptide Peak Attributes

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based proteomics provides a wealth of information about proteins present in biological samples. In bottom-up LC-MS/MS-based proteomics, proteins are enzymatically digested into peptides prior to query by LC-MS/MS. Thus, the information directly available from the LC-MS/MS data is at the peptide level. If a protein-level analysis is desired, the peptide-level information must be rolled up into protein-level information. We propose a principal component analysis-based statistical method, ProPCA, for efficiently estimating relative protein abundance from bottom-up label-free LC-MS/MS data that incorporates both spectral count information and LC-MS peptide ion peak attributes, such as peak area, volume, or height. ProPCA may be used effectively with a variety of quantification platforms and is easily implemented. We show that ProPCA outperformed existing quantitative methods for peptide-protein roll-up, including spectral counting methods and other methods for combining LC-MS peptide peak attributes. The performance of ProPCA was validated using a data set derived from the LC-MS/MS analysis of a mixture of protein standards (the UPS2 proteomic dynamic range standard introduced by The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Proteomics Standards Research Group in 2006). Finally, we applied ProPCA to a comparative LC-MS/MS analysis of digested total cell lysates prepared for LC-MS/MS analysis by alternative lysis methods and show that ProPCA identified more differentially abundant proteins than competing methods.One of the fundamental goals of proteomics methods for the biological sciences is to identify and quantify all proteins present in a sample. LC-MS/MS-based proteomics methodologies offer a promising approach to this problem (1–3). These methodologies allow for the acquisition of a vast amount of information about the proteins present in a sample. However, extracting reliable protein abundance information from LC-MS/MS data remains challenging. In this work, we were primarily concerned with the analysis of data acquired using bottom-up label-free LC-MS/MS-based proteomics techniques where “bottom-up” refers to the fact that proteins are enzymatically digested into peptides prior to query by the LC-MS/MS instrument platform (4), and “label-free” indicates that analyses are performed without the aid of stable isotope labels. One challenge inherent in the bottom-up approach to proteomics is that information directly available from the LC-MS/MS data is at the peptide level. When a protein-level analysis is desired, as is often the case with discovery-driven LC-MS research, peptide-level information must be rolled up into protein-level information.Spectral counting (5–10) is a straightforward and widely used example of peptide-protein roll-up for LC-MS/MS data. Information experimentally acquired in single stage (MS) and tandem (MS/MS) spectra may lead to the assignment of MS/MS spectra to peptide sequences in a database-driven or database-free manner using various peptide identification software platforms (SEQUEST (11) and Mascot (12), for instance); the identified peptide sequences correspond, in turn, to proteins. In principle, the number of tandem spectra matched to peptides corresponding to a certain protein, the spectral count (SC),1 is positively associated with the abundance of a protein (5). In spectral counting techniques, raw or normalized SCs are used as a surrogate for protein abundance. Spectral counting methods have been moderately successful in quantifying protein abundance and identifying significant proteins in various settings. However, SC-based methods do not make full use of information available from peaks in the LC-MS domain, and this surely leads to loss of efficiency.Peaks in the LC-MS domain corresponding to peptide ion species are highly sensitive to differences in protein abundance (13, 14). Identifying LC-MS peaks that correspond to detected peptides and measuring quantitative attributes of these peaks (such as height, area, or volume) offers a promising alternative to spectral counting methods. These methods have become especially popular in applications using stable isotope labeling (15). However, challenges remain, especially in the label-free analysis of complex proteomics samples where complications in peak detection, alignment, and integration are a significant obstacle. In practice, alignment, identification, and quantification of LC-MS peptide peak attributes (PPAs) may be accomplished using recently developed peak matching platforms (16–18). A highly sensitive indicator of protein abundance may be obtained by rolling up PPA measurements into protein-level information (16, 19, 20). Existing peptide-protein roll-up procedures based on PPAs typically involve taking the mean of (possibly normalized) PPA measurements over all peptides corresponding to a protein to obtain a protein-level estimate of abundance. Despite the promise of PPA-based procedures for protein quantification, the performance of PPA-based methods may vary widely depending on the particular roll-up procedure used; furthermore, PPA-based procedures are limited by difficulties in accurately identifying and measuring peptide peak attributes. These two issues are related as the latter issue affects the robustness of PPA-based roll-up methods. Indeed, existing peak matching and quantification platforms tend to result in PPA measurement data sets with substantial missingness (16, 19, 21), especially when working with very complex samples where substantial dynamic ranges and ion suppression are difficulties that must be overcome. Missingness may, in turn, lead to instability in protein-level abundance estimates. A good peptide-protein roll-up procedure that utilizes PPAs should account for this missingness and the resulting instability in a principled way. However, even in the absence of missingness, there is no consensus in the existing literature on peptide-protein roll-up for PPA measurements.In this work, we propose ProPCA, a peptide-protein roll-up method for efficiently extracting protein abundance information from bottom-up label-free LC-MS/MS data. ProPCA is an easily implemented, unsupervised method that is related to principle component analysis (PCA) (22). ProPCA optimally combines SC and PPA data to obtain estimates of relative protein abundance. ProPCA addresses missingness in PPA measurement data in a unified way while capitalizing on strengths of both SCs and PPA-based roll-up methods. In particular, ProPCA adapts to the quality of the available PPA measurement data. If the PPA measurement data are poor and, in the extreme case, no PPA measurements are available, then ProPCA is equivalent to spectral counting. On the other hand, if there is no missingness in the PPA measurement data set, then the ProPCA estimate is a weighted mean of PPA measurements and spectral counts where the weights are chosen to reflect the ability of spectral counts and each peptide to predict protein abundance.Below, we assess the performance of ProPCA using a data set obtained from the LC-MS/MS analysis of protein standards (UPS2 proteomic dynamic range standard set² manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich) and show that ProPCA outperformed other existing roll-up methods by multiple metrics. The applicability of ProPCA is not limited by the quantification platform used to obtain SCs and PPA measurements. To demonstrate this, we show that ProPCA continued to perform well when used with an alternative quantification platform. Finally, we applied ProPCA to a comparative LC-MS/MS analysis of digested total human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell lysates prepared for LC-MS/MS analysis by alternative lysis methods. We show that ProPCA identified more differentially abundant proteins than competing methods.     

Integrated Identification and Quantification Error Probabilities for Shotgun Proteomics

1. Download : Download high-res image (96KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

• •Unified identification and quantification error rates for protein quantification.
• •Error propagation using graphical models and Bayesian statistics.
• •Account for uncertainty of missing values instead of overconfident point estimates.
• •Control of differential expression false discovery rate at increased sensitivity.

     

Simultaneous Quantification of Protein Expression and Modifications by Top-down Targeted Proteomics: A Case of the Sarcomeric Subproteome

1. Download : Download high-res image (150KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

• •A new strategy for simultaneous quantification of protein expression and modification.
• •This top-down LC/MS-based method shows high reproducibility and high throughput.
• •Quantification at the intact protein level with results comparable to Western blot.
• •This top-down proteomics method is applicable to different species and tissues.

     

A Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Assay for Protein Kinases and Protein Phosphatases Using Peptide Substrates

A novel procedure for detection and assay of protein kinase and phosphatase activities in complex biological mixtures was developed. By means of capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) methodology, the phosphorylated and dephosphorylated forms of the peptide Kemptide, a 46-amino-acid fragment from protein phosphatase inhibitor-1 and a peptide fragment corresponding to the R_II subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), were rapidly resolved. This facilitated nonradioactive detection of PKA and protein phosphatase-2B (calcineurin) in rabbit skeletal muscle extracts. In addition, the CZE procedure enabled a site-specific assay of a 14-amino-acid peptide from the glycogen-binding subunit of protein phosphatase-1 monophosphorylated on distinct sites by PKA and casein kinase-II. These results suggest that CZE may prove to be extremely useful for the analysis of peptides that are phosphorylated at multiple sites in vivo.     

DeepFunc: A Deep Learning Framework for Accurate Prediction of Protein Functions from Protein Sequences and Interactions

Annotation of protein functions plays an important role in understanding life at the molecular level. High‐throughput sequencing produces massive numbers of raw proteins sequences and only about 1% of them have been manually annotated with functions. Experimental annotations of functions are expensive, time‐consuming and do not keep up with the rapid growth of the sequence numbers. This motivates the development of computational approaches that predict protein functions. A novel deep learning framework, DeepFunc, is proposed which accurately predicts protein functions from protein sequence‐ and network‐derived information. More precisely, DeepFunc uses a long and sparse binary vector to encode information concerning domains, families, and motifs collected from the InterPro tool that is associated with the input protein sequence. This vector is processed with two neural layers to obtain a low‐dimensional vector which is combined with topological information extracted from protein–protein interactions (PPIs) and functional linkages. The combined information is processed by a deep neural network that predicts protein functions. DeepFunc is empirically and comparatively tested on a benchmark testing dataset and the Critical Assessment of protein Function Annotation algorithms (CAFA) 3 dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that DeepFunc outperforms current methods on the testing dataset and that it secures the highest F_max = 0.54 and AUC = 0.94 on the CAFA3 dataset.     

A Novel Cell-Penetrating Peptide Derived from Human Eosinophil Cationic Protein

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are short peptides which can carry various types of molecules into cells; however, although most CPPs rapidly penetrate cells in vitro, their in vivo tissue-targeting specificities are low. Herein, we describe cell-binding, internalization, and targeting characteristics of a newly identified 10-residue CPP, denoted ECP^32–41, derived from the core heparin-binding motif of human eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). Besides traditional emphasis on positively charged residues, the presence of cysteine and tryptophan residues was demonstrated to be essential for internalization. ECP^32–41 entered Beas-2B and wild-type CHO-K1 cells, but not CHO cells lacking of cell-surface glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), indicating that binding of ECP^32–41 to cell-surface GAGs was required for internalization. When cells were cultured with GAGs or pre-treated with GAG-digesting enzymes, significant decreases in ECP^32–41 internalization were observed, suggesting that cell-surface GAGs, especially heparan sulfate proteoglycans were necessary for ECP^32–41 attachment and penetration. Furthermore, treatment with pharmacological agents identified two forms of energy-dependent endocytosis, lipid-raft endocytosis and macropinocytosis, as the major ECP^32–41 internalization routes. ECP^32–41 was demonstrated to transport various cargoes including fluorescent chemical, fluorescent protein, and peptidomimetic drug into cultured Beas-2B cells in vitro, and targeted broncho-epithelial and intestinal villi tissues in vivo. Hence this CPP has the potential to serve as a novel vehicle for intracellular delivery of biomolecules or medicines, especially for the treatment of pulmonary or gastrointestinal diseases.     

gpGrouper: A Peptide Grouping Algorithm for Gene-Centric Inference and Quantitation of Bottom-Up Proteomics Data

1. Download : Download high-res image (162KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

• •Gene-centric inference algorithm with classification for distinguishable groups.
• •Shared peptides are split proportionally to corresponding unique peptide ratios.
• •iBAQ values are calculated for label-free, isotopic or isobaric labeling methods.
• •Universally handles single or mixed species PDX data with accurate deconvolution.

     

Label-Free Protein Quantification for Plant Golgi Protein Localization and Abundance

The proteomic composition of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Golgi apparatus is currently reasonably well documented; however, little is known about the relative abundances between different proteins within this compartment. Accurate quantitative information of Golgi resident proteins is of great importance: it facilitates a better understanding of the biochemical processes that take place within this organelle, especially those of different polysaccharide synthesis pathways. Golgi resident proteins are challenging to quantify because the abundance of this organelle is relatively low within the cell. In this study, an organelle fractionation approach targeting the Golgi apparatus was combined with a label-free quantitative mass spectrometry (data-independent acquisition method using ion mobility separation known as LC-IMS-MS^E [or HDMS^E]) to simultaneously localize proteins to the Golgi apparatus and assess their relative quantity. In total, 102 Golgi-localized proteins were quantified. These data show that organelle fractionation in conjunction with label-free quantitative mass spectrometry is a powerful and relatively simple tool to access protein organelle localization and their relative abundances. The findings presented open a unique view on the organization of the plant Golgi apparatus, leading toward unique hypotheses centered on the biochemical processes of this organelle.The plant Golgi apparatus plays an important role in protein and lipid glycosylation and sorting as well as biosynthesis of large amounts of extracellular polysaccharides. It contains a large and diverse set of glycosyltransferases and other enzymes that are required for the synthesis and modification of these polysaccharides (Parsons et al., 2012b; Oikawa et al., 2013). The protein composition of this organelle has been the focus of a number of studies; however, these studies largely report a catalog of Golgi-localized proteins, and to date, there are no comprehensive data on the relative abundance of the different protein constituents of the Golgi apparatus (Dunkley et al., 2004, 2006; Sadowski et al., 2008; Nikolovski et al., 2012; Groen et al., 2014). The quantification of the plant Golgi proteome has been considered challenging, because this organelle is proportionally of low abundance in the cell; therefore, its constituent proteins are rarely identified in conventional proteomics experiments. Investigation of such low-abundance proteins generally requires sample fractionation on the organelle, protein, or peptide level (Stasyk and Huber, 2004; Haynes and Roberts, 2007; Di Palma et al., 2012).Here, an organelle fractionation approach in conjunction with label-free quantitative proteomic analysis was used to assess the localization and relative abundance of proteins within the plant Golgi apparatus. Label-free quantification is an increasingly popular alternative to isotopic tagging quantitative methods; it does not require labeling reagents and can be applied to an unlimited number of samples (Neilson et al., 2011; Evans et al., 2012). This is particularly appealing within plant proteomics, because the most conventional labeling strategy, Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, is not easily suited for quantitative plant proteomic studies. The average labeling efficiency achieved using exogenous amino acid supply to Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) cell cultures was found to be only 70% to 80% (Gruhler et al., 2005). Quantitative strategies with ¹⁵N metabolic labeling have been described for plant proteome analysis; however, care should be taken to ensure complete ¹⁵N incorporation, because even small amounts of ¹⁴N in the labeled sample can have significant detrimental effects on the number of peptide identifications (Nelson et al., 2007; Guo and Li, 2011; Arsova et al., 2012).In all label-free methods, samples under comparison are analyzed during separate mass spectrometry (MS) experiments (Neilson et al., 2011). The information from identified peptides is then used for relative and/or absolute quantification. The simplest label-free method involves taking the number of spectra acquired and assigned to peptides from the same protein as a measure of abundance (Ishihama et al., 2005). In an alternative approach, ion current recorded for a peptide ion is used as a measure of its abundance. The assumption is made that ion intensity is proportional to peptide amount in the sample analyzed, which holds true for nanoflow and microflow liquid chromatography (LC) systems (Levin et al., 2011; Christianson et al., 2013). Comparing peptide ion current between samples is, thus, widely used for relative quantification (Silva et al., 2005). To allow such comparison, a peptide must be identified across all samples under investigation, which is often challenging in LC-MS experiments given the highly complex nature of proteomics samples that contain tens of thousands of different peptides (Michalski et al., 2011). Hence, most relative ion intensity-based label-free approaches usually involve a step of identification transfer (Pasa-Tolíc et al., 2004). This involves matching ions from different acquisitions (in one of which, the ion has not been identified and is assigned the sequence from its matching pair in the other acquisition).Additionally, label-free proteomics can be used for absolute quantification (i.e. to estimate abundance of different proteins relative to each other within a given sample). Several different approaches have been suggested on how to convert peptide intensities to protein amounts (for comparison, see Wilhelm et al., 2014). One of the first such methods was Top-3 described by Silva et al. (2006b), who made a notable and unexpected observation, stating that the average MS signal response for the three most abundant peptides per 1 mol of protein is constant within a coefficient of variation of less than 10% (Silva et al., 2006b).In all these approaches, the peptide ion current is typically computed as the area under the curve of the chromatographic elution profile that is reconstituted from separate MS1 survey scans in which intact precursors are recorded. Determining a chromatographic profile accurately requires that the MS1 scans are performed at optimal frequency (Lange et al., 2008) and for optimal duration to record the MS1 signal at a high signal-to-noise ratio. In typical data-dependent acquisitions, however, the mass spectrometer oscillates between MS1 survey scans recording the mass/charge (m/z) for precursor peptide ions and then, a series of MS2 scans fragmenting one peptide ion precursor at a time, producing fragmentation spectra necessary for identification (Sadygov et al., 2004). As a result, the duration and frequency of MS2 scans determine the identification rate in data-dependent acquisition experiments but compromise time spent in MS1 required for accurate area under the curve quantification. Several groups have suggested data-independent acquisition, in which individual peptide ions are not selected for fragmentation but rather, groups of peptides of similar m/z are fragmented together. The exact number of cofragmented precursors depends on the speed and sensitivity of instrument configuration (for review, see Law and Lim, 2013). The simplest approach involves alternating between low-energy and high-energy scans of equal duration; low-energy scans record precursor peptide ions, whereas in high-energy scans, all precursors entering the mass spectrometer are cofragmented, and their fragments are recorded simultaneously. The method was called MS^E for Waters qTOF Mass Spectrometers (Geromanos et al., 2009) or all-ion fragmentation for Thermo Orbitrap Mass Spectrometers (Geiger et al., 2010). The analysis required downstream of this type of data acquisition is challenging given that the information of fragment origin (i.e. from what precursor peptide ion fragment was generated) is lost completely and that the high number of coeluting peptides is expected to create highly overlapping fragment spectra on fragmentation. To address this problem, Hoaglund-Hyzer and Clemmer (2001) have suggested fractionating peptides by ion mobility separation before fragmentation and MS and assigning fragments to precursors based on similarity of both chromatographic and mobility profiles (Hoaglund-Hyzer and Clemmer, 2001). The method was termed parallel fragmentation, and since that time, it has been commercialized by Waters as IMS-MS^E or HDMS^E (Shliaha et al., 2013).To date, the application of label-free quantitative proteomics to plant biology has been very limited. Recently, Helm et al. (2014) applied the LC-IMS-MS^E with Top-3 quantification to quantify the Arabidopsis chloroplast stroma proteome, allowing quantitative modeling of chloroplast metabolism. Two other works used the LC-MS^E method to assess the quantitative changes of cytosolic ribosomal proteins in response to Suc feeding and the extracellular proteome in response to salicylic acid (Cheng et al., 2009; Hummel et al., 2012).A number of proteomics approaches have been described to assess protein localization on a large scale (for review, see Gatto et al., 2010). Purification approaches attempt to isolate organelles to high levels of purity and subsequently identify and quantify proteins using LC-MS; however, such attempts yield limiting success and high false discovery rates (Andersen et al., 2002; Parsons et al., 2012a). A known limitation of this technique is the inability to completely isolate an organelle of interest, which combined with high proteome dynamic range, can result in some more abundant contaminants being identified and quantified at higher amounts than the target organelle residents. Moreover, even if a target organelle could be isolated to a certain degree of purity, it would still be impossible to deconvolute organelle residents from transient proteins that traffic through the target organelle. This becomes especially challenging for the organelles of the secretory pathway. To address these challenges, several groups applied fractionation of all organelles by gradient centrifugation and subsequent protein quantification by LC-MS. This produces distributions across the gradient for all quantified proteins, which are then used to assign organelle localization based on the specific distributions of organelle marker proteins. This effectively solves the problem of organelle contamination and protein trafficking, because a protein is expected to have a distribution characteristic of its organelle of residence, even if it is identified in all fractions, including those enriched in other organelles. Current variations of this method differ mostly by the LC-MS strategy used for quantification; for example, spectral counting was applied for protein-correlating profiles (Andersen et al., 2003), isobaric mass tagging (Nikolovski et al., 2012) and isotope-coded affinity tagging (Dunkley et al., 2004) were applied for localization of organelle proteins by isotope tagging (LOPIT), and Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture was applied for nucleolus/nucleus/cytosolic fractionation (Boisvert and Lamond, 2010).Here, a label-free LC-IMS-MS^E method was used for the analysis of density ultracentrifugation fractions enriched for the Golgi apparatus. First, we use relative label-free quantification involving identification transfer using the previously published synapter algorithm (Bond et al., 2013) to assess distributions of Golgi-localized proteins across the density gradient. These distributions are significantly different from those of residents of other organelles, which results in unambiguous protein assignment to the Golgi apparatus by multivariate data analysis. Second, the Top-3 absolute quantification method as implemented in Protein Lynx Global Server (PLGS) was used to rank order the Golgi-localized proteins by abundance in the fraction most enriched for Golgi apparatus. In conclusion, we present the analysis of protein distribution and abundances of the Golgi apparatus-enriched portion of the ultracentrifugation density gradient, allowing for simultaneous protein quantification and localization and leading to the assessment of relative abundances of 102 Golgi-localized proteins.     

A Rapid and Sensitive Fluorimetric Protocol for the Quantification of Green Fluorescent Protein in Soluble Protein Extracts from Transgenic Arabidopsis

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) is a popular qualitative reporter protein used to study different aspects of plant biology. However, to be used as a reliable quantitative reporter in expression studies using fluorescence based assays, methods to eliminate interfering endogenous molecules must be considered. Therefore, a standard curve based solid phase fluorescent immunoassay that eliminates the effects of interfering endogenous molecules was developed to quantify the GFP levels in soluble green extracts prepared from plants. Microtiter plates coated with anti-GFP were used to capture GFP from soluble plant extracts, interfering endogenous molecules was eliminated by washing without disturbing the anti-GFP binding of GFP, and then the fluorescence intensity of bound GFP was measured using a spectrofluorometer. We report in this study the use of this method to quantify the expression levels of soluble modified GFP in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana.