V-Y advancement flaps for closure of nasal defects

The nose is a difficult anatomic region in which to close defects resulting from resection of cutaneous malignancies. The V-Y flap is a technique for advancing adjacent tissue, thereby achieving wound closure while minimizing tension. A total of 120 V-Y flaps were used to close 114 nasal defects. The average defect size was 13.5 x 11 mm. Partial flap loss occurred in five patients, with total flap loss in one. One wound infection and two hematomas occurred.     

Composite upper lip repair with V-Y advancement flaps

In two patients, large but superficial partial-thickness resections of lateral upper lip have been repaired by composite island cutaneous flaps. Upper lip and nasolabial fold flaps, along with lateral vermilion, were advanced and closed in a V-Y manner leaving inconspicuous scars and no contour deformity.     

Bipedicle strap flaps in reconstruction of longitudinal dorsal skin defects of the digits

Dorsal skin defects in which the loss of integument is longitudinal in shape are not uncommon after injury by rotating machinery and by glass shearing along the length of the digit. This shape of defect is difficult to reconstruct with commonly used flaps but lends itself to reconstruction by the use of longitudinal bipedicle strap flaps moved across the dorsum of the finger from lateral to medial. A variant of this traditional technique was used in the reconstruction of 28 dorsal digital defects. The incidence of these defects and the need for this reconstructive technique were analyzed by a review of 1077 patients with dorsal digital injuries treated in a 6-year period between 1989 and 1995. Approximately 20 percent of all dorsal digital injuries requiring flap reconstruction were suitable for reconstruction with bipedicle strap flaps.     

Reconstruction of heel and sole defects by free flaps

One latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and five radial forearm flaps were used in reconstruction of weight-bearing parts of the heel and sole, the follow-up period being 7 to 38 months. Additional injuries such as forefoot amputations or amputations of the other leg were present in four patients. There was no flap loss. The latissimus dorsi flap proved to be too bulky and showed recurrent ulcerations, several reoperations were necessary, and definite healing has not occurred. The five forearm flaps gave good results, with a walking range from 2 hours to unimpeded walking. Complications included fissuring at the edges of one large flap and a local infection which was successfully treated. Cutaneous sensation returned in all but one flap, where it was reduced preoperatively due to a meningomyelocele. The results indicate that the fasciocutaneous radial forearm flap should be taken into consideration for reconstruction of weight-bearing areas of the heel and sole. Shortcomings of this flap include an unsightly donor defect and possible hair growth on the flap.     

The new bilaterally pedicled V-Y advancement flap for face reconstruction

A new bilaterally pedicled V-Y advancement flap based on two subcutaneous pedicles that vascularize the skin island through subdermal plexus lateral bridges is described for face reconstruction. It differs from traditional V-Y advancement flaps in that it does not rely on the classic subcutaneous "vertical" pedicle that is sectioned from top to bottom to improve advancement of the skin island. This technique had predictable results for 12 years in 425 consecutive patients, with infection occurring in 2.8 percent of the cases and complete necrosis in less than 1 percent of the flaps.     

Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects

A new type of flap is described based on unnamed perforators located near the midline of the lower back region. Such flaps combine the superior blood supply of the myocutaneous flap with the lack of donor-site morbidity of a skin flap. Five clinical cases are presented, showing how such perforators can augment skin flaps or create custom-designed island flaps. The dissection of the flap is described, and further possibilities for its use are suggested.     

Comparison between sensitive and nonsensitive free flaps in reconstruction of the heel and plantar area

In this study, 12 cases of reconstruction of the heel and plantar area since 1982 are reviewed. Six nonsensate muscle free flaps and six sensate fasciocutaneous flaps were used, respectively. Categories assessed were the time interval for return to daily living activities, sensation to light touch, pinprick, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test of the reconstructed area for sensory evaluation; and results of pedograms (maximal pressure, pressure distribution, and total contact area of the plantar surface). Follow-up periods were between 2 and 14 years, with an average of 6 years. Better sensory results and early return to daily living activities were observed in the sensate flap group, but the defects were smaller in this group. Despite the slightly longer time to return to daily living activities and worse sensory results, long-term follow-up showed that patients with nonsensate flaps had no difficulty in performing living activities if they continued to be careful and to use some kind of protective shoes. The results of the pedogram analyses were similar between the two groups with regard to total contact area of the reconstructed foot in relation to the healthy foot. Pressure values of the reconstructed areas in sensate flaps were found to be close to pressure values in the same weight areas of the normal foot. The differences between pressure values of the sensate and nonsensate flaps were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Therefore, in reconstruction of the weight-bearing surface of the foot, each case should be evaluated individually. The reconstructive method should be chosen according to the location and soft-tissue requirements of the defect.