The Effects of Density on the Learned Recognition of Heterospecific Alarm Cues

Numerous species, both aquatic and terrestrial, use alarm cues to mediate predation risk. These cues may be either intentionally or inadvertently released, and may be received by either conspecifics or heterospecifics. In aquatic systems, alarm cues are often chemical in nature and are released when an organism is disturbed or damaged by a predator. In some cases the recognition of alarm cues from conspecifics, or closely related heterospecifics, is innate, while the recognition of alarm cues from distantly related species must be learned. Many studies have documented the use of heterospecific alarm cues, but few have explored the manner in which these cues come to be recognized as an indication of predation. In the current study, we examined the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)/brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) alarm system. We tested the effect of density on the ability of minnows to learn to recognize stickleback alarm cues as a threat. We hypothesized that the ability of minnows to learn to recognize stickleback alarm cues should increase with increasing stickleback density because there would be more opportunity for minnows to associate the heterospecific alarm cue with the threat. To test this hypothesis we stocked minnows into large outdoor pools with no stickleback, low numbers of stickleback, or high numbers of stickleback. All pools contained a predator (pike, Esox lucius) known to the minnows. Following a 14 d conditioning period, minnows were tested for a response to skin extract from stickleback, minnow, and an unknown heterospecific (swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri). Minnows from pools with large numbers of stickleback learned to respond to stickleback alarm cues while minnows from pools with low numbers of stickleback, or no stickleback, did not.     

Effects of exposure to predatory cues on territorial behaviour of male fathead minnows

We conducted a laboratory study to determine if male fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, altered their territorial behaviour associated with reproduction in response to combinations of visual and chemical cues from northern pike, Esox lucius. We introduced the following stimuli to a territorial male: a brick (control), fathead minnow alarm pheromone, a pike fed brook stickleback, Culea inconstans, or a pike fed fathead minnow. The territorial behaviour of males did not change when the control was added. Male minnows experiencing threat from pike fed stickleback significantly reduced the frequency at which they performed three territorial behaviours, but, within 12 h, had returned to pre-exposure activity levels. Male minnows subjected to alarm pheromone alone and to pike fed fathead minnow significantly reduced their territorial behaviour, abandoned their nests, and did not return to pre-exposure levels of activity after 24 h. We suggest that because risk of predation triggers prolonged decreases in territorial defense, it may affect competition between nesting males and female mate choice. We conclude that fathead minnows can assess the severity of predatory threat and adjust their reproductive behaviour accordingly.     

Learned Recognition of Heterospecific Alarm Signals: The Importance of a Mixed Predator Diet

A wide diversity of aquatic organisms release alarm signals upon being attacked by a predator. Alarm signals may 'warn' nearby individuals of danger. Moreover, the signals may be important in facilitating learned recognition of unknown stimuli. It is common for different prey species to respond to each other's chemical alarm signals. In many cases, the responses are learned but no learning mechanisms have been identified to date. In this study we tested whether prey fish can learn the identity of an unknown alarm signal when they detect it in association with conspecific alarm cues in the diet of a predator. Chemical alarm cues are known to be conserved in the diet of predators. We conditioned fathead minnows ( Pimephales promelas ) with chemical stimuli from predatory yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ) fed a mixed diet of minnows and brook stickleback ( Culaea inconstans ), perch fed a mixed diet of swordtails ( Xiphophorus helleri ) and stickleback or distilled water. Minnows were subsequently exposed to chemical alarm cues of injured stickleback alone. Those minnows previously conditioned with perch fed a mixed diet of minnows and stickleback increased their use of shelter and 'froze' significantly more than minnows previously conditioned with perch fed a diet of swordtails and stickleback or those exposed to distilled water. These data demonstrate a mechanism by which minnows can learn the identity of a heterospecific alarm signal.     

The role of experience and chemical alarm signalling in predator recognition by fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas

Young-of-the-year, predator-naive fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas , from a pikesympatric population did not respond to chemical stimuli from northern pike, Esox Indus , while wild-caught fish of the same age and size did. These results suggest that chemical predator recognition is a result of previous experience and not genetic factors, Wild young-of-the-year minnows responded to pike odour with a response intensity that was similar to that of older fish, demonstrating that the ability to recognize predators is learned within the first year. The intensity of response of wild minnows which had been maintained in a predator free environment for 1 year was similar to that of recently caught minnows of the same age, suggesting that reinforcement was not required for predator recognition to be retained. Naive minnows that were exposed simultaneously to chemical stimuli from pike (a neutral stimulus) and minnow alarm substance exhibited a fright response upon subsequent exposure to the pike stimulus alone. Predator-naive minnows exposed simultaneously to chemical stimuli from pike and glass-distilled water did not exhibit a fright response to the pike stimulus alone. These results demonstrate that fathead minnows can acquire predator recognition through releaserinduced recognition learning, thus confirming a known mechanism through which alarm substance may benefit the receivers of an alarm signal.     

Underwater Video Reveals Strong Avoidance of Chemical Alarm Cues by Prey Fishes

A diversity of fishes release chemical cues upon being attacked by a predator. These cues, commonly termed alarm cues, act as sources of public information warning conspecifics of predation risk. Species which are members of the same prey guild (i.e. syntopic and share predators) often respond to one another's alarm cues. The purpose of this study was to discriminate avoidance responses of fishes to conspecific alarm cues and cues of other prey guild members from responses to unknown damaged fish odours and novel odours. We used underwater video to measure avoidance responses of freshwater littoral species, namely fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), finescale dace (Chrosomus neogaeus), and brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans), to both injured fish cues and novel non‐fish odours. The cyprinids (minnows and dace) showed significant avoidance of minnow cues over swordtail cues, morpholine, and the control of distilled water and tended to avoid fathead cues over cues of known prey guild members (stickleback). Cyprinids also significantly avoided cues of stickleback over unknown heterospecific cues (swordtail) and tended to avoid stickleback cues over morpholine and the distilled water control. Stickleback significantly avoided fathead minnow extract over the distilled water and tended to avoid stickleback and swordtail over distilled water. We conclude that fishes in their natural environment can show dramatic changes in behaviour upon exposure to alarm cues from conspecifics and prey guild members. These responses do not represent avoidance of cues of any injured fish or any novel odour.     

Fathead minnows avoid conspedfic and heterospedfic alarm pheromones in the faeces of northern pike

Groups of fathead minnows Pimephales promelas were tested to determine if they avoided areas of a test tank labelled with the faeces of a predator (northern pike, Esox lucius ) which had recently been fed minnows, brook sticklebacks Culaea inconstans , or swordtails Xiphophorus helleri. Minnows exhibited a fright reaction upon presentation of sponges labelled with faeces, when the pike had consumed minnows or sticklebacks, but not swordtails (which lack alarm pheromones). The fright reaction was characterized by increased shoal cohesiveness and increased dashing and freezing behaviour. Minnows avoided the area of the tank containing the faeces from pike on diets of minnows or sticklebacks, but not from pike fed a diet of swordtails. These data demonstrate that: (1) minnows actively avoid the faeces of pike fed minnows or brook sticklebacks, and (2) minnows exhibit a fright reaction to the faeces of a pike fed brook sticklebacks.     

Fathead Minnows, Pimephales promelas, Learn to Recognize Chemical Alarm Cues of Introduced Brook Stickleback, Culaea inconstans

In four experiments conducted over a 6-year period, we investigated whether fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, could acquire the ability to recognize chemical alarm cues of introduced brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans. A laboratory experiment documented that stickleback-naïve minnows did not exhibit an anti-predator response when exposed to the chemical alarm cues of stickleback. In a laboratory experiment conducted 5 years after the introduction of stickleback to the pond, minnows exhibited an antipredator response to stickleback cues. Moreover, in a field experiment the minnows exhibited avoidance of areas labelled with stickleback alarm cues. Minnows raised from eggs taken from the test pond did not exhibit an anti-predator response to stickleback cues while minnows from the test pond that had experience with stickleback cues did respond to stickleback cues. Our results provide clear evidence that cross-species responses to chemical alarm cues of fishes can be learned. Learned recognition of alarm cues has important implications for predator/prey interactions.     

Foraging Trade-offs in Fathead Minnows (Pimephales promelas,Osteichthyes, Cyprinidae): Acquired Predator Recognition in the Absence of an Alarm Response

Pike-naive fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) were fed ad libitum or deprived of food for 12, 24, or 48 h and then exposed to either conspecific alarm pheromone or distilled water and the odour of a predatory northern pike (Esox lucius). Minnows fed ad libitum or deprived for 12 h showed a stereotypic alarm response to the alarm pheromone (increased time under cover objects and increased occurrence of dashing and freezing behaviour); those deprived of food for 24 h showed a significantly reduced alarm response, while those deprived of food for 48 h did not differ significantly from the minnows exposed to a distilled water control. Upon subsequent testing in an Opto-Varimex activity meter, all groups initially exposed to alarm pheromone and pike odour exhibited an alarm response when exposed to pike odour alone. Those initially conditioned with distilled water and pike odour did nor show an alarm response to pike odour alone. These results demonstrate that there exists a significant trade-off between hunger level and predator-avoidance behaviour in fathead minnows and that minnows can learn the chemical cues of a predatory northern pike through association with alarm pheromone even in the absence of an observable alarm response.     

Chemical Alarm Signals Enhance Survival of Brook Charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) During Encounters with Predatory Chain Pickerel (Esox niger)

A diversity of aquatic organisms release chemical alarm signals when attacked or captured by a predator. These alarm signals are thought to warn other conspecifics of danger and, consequently, may benefit receivers by increasing their survival. Here we experimentally investigated the differences in behaviour and survival of hatchery-reared juvenile brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis that had been exposed to either brook charr skin extract (experimental treatment) or a control of swordtail skin extract (control treatment). Charr exposed to conspecific skin extract exhibited a significant reduction in movement and/or altered their foraging behaviour in the laboratory when compared with charr exposed to swordtail skin extract. We also exposed charr to either water conditioned by a single brook charr disturbed by a predatory bird model or water conditioned by a single undisturbed brook charr. Charr exposed to disturbance signals reduced activity significantly more than charr exposed to chemical stimuli from undisturbed charr. These results demonstrate the existence of both damage-released alarm signals and disturbance signals in brook charr. Wild brook charr also responded to damage-released alarm cues under natural conditions. Charr avoided areas of a stream with minnow traps labelled with conspecific alarm cues vs. control cues. During staged encounters with chain pickerel Esox niger in the laboratory, predator-naive charr fry were better able to evade the predator if they were previously warned by an alarm signal, thus suggesting a survival benefit to receivers. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the presence of alarm signals in brook charr has important implications for understanding predator–prey interactions.     

Innate responses to conspecific and heterospecific alarm cues in the endangered eastern cape redfin Pseudobarbus afer

We examined innate responses to conspecific and heterospecific alarm cues in a small cyprinid minnow, the Eastern Cape redfin Pseudobarbus afer. We found that redfins respond to conspecific skin extract, which contains alarm chemicals, and showed that their preferred response is to hide in refugia. Redfins also respond to skin extract from an allopatric, distantly related minnow species, the chubbyhead barb Enteromius anoplus indicating that neither sympatry nor close phylogenetic relationships are necessary for recognition of heterospecific alarm cues. Although both conspecific and heterospecific alarm cues induced similar responses, the response to heterospecific cues was less intense. This may be explained by a trade-off between selection to maximise threat recognition and selection to avoid the costs of responding to irrelevant cues, or by differences in chemical structures of alarm cues between species. These findings have implications for the conservation of this Endangered fish species and for freshwater fishes throughout Africa.     

Smell, learn and live: The role of chemical alarm cues in predator learning during early life history in a marine fish

The speed with which individuals can learn to identify and react appropriately to predation threats when transitioning to new life history stages and habitats will influence their survival. This study investigated the role of chemical alarm cues in both anti-predator responses and predator identification during a transitional period in a newly settled coral reef damselfish, Pomacentrus amboinensis. Individuals were tested for changes in seven behavioural traits in response to conspecific and heterospecific skin extracts. Additionally, we tested whether fish could learn to associate a previously novel chemical cue (i.e. simulated predator scent) with danger, after previously being exposed to a paired cue combining the conspecific skin extract with the novel scent. Fish exposed to conspecific skin extracts were found to significantly decreased their feeding rate whilst those exposed to heterospecific and control cues showed no change. Individuals were also able to associate a previously novel scent with danger after only a single previous exposure to the paired conspecific skin extract/novel scent cue. Our results indicate that chemical alarm cues play a large role in both threat detection and learned predator recognition during the early post-settlement period in coral reef fishes.     

Chemical alarm signals increase the survival time of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) during encounters with northern pike (Esox Lucius)

We tested the hypothesis that exposure to a conspecific alarmpheromone improves survival of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas)during staged encounters with an unfamiliar predator (northernpike: Esox luaus). Minnows exposed to the alarm pheromone survived39. 5% longer than controls. This difference in survival timeappeared to result not from direct inhibition of the pike butrather from some aspect of the minnows' antipredator behavior.Minnows exhibited significant increases in both shoaling andshelter use after exposure to the alarm pheromone. For controlminnows, the degree of shoaling was positively correlated withsurvival time, suggesting that increased shoaling is an effectiveantipredator response. This study provides the first directexperimental evidence that chemical alarm signals in fishesimprove survival of receivers.     

Free—living fathead minnows rapidly learn to recognize pike as predators

Individuals from a natural population of approximately 20 000 fathead minnows from a pike–free pond did not respond with appropriate anti–predator behaviour upon encountering pike odour in laboratory tests. However, 14 days after 10 pike were stocked into the pond, minnows had acquired recognition of pike odour. Laboratory studies have indicated several possible mechanisms for acquiring predator recognition in fathead minnows. This study indicates that these, or similar processes, can produce major changes in predator recognition in the wild.     

Differential responses of male and female red swordtails to chemical alarm cues

Male and female red swordtails Xiphophorus helleri exposed in the laboratory to swordtail skin extract, fathead minnow Pimephales promelas skin extract and distilled water, significantly decreased activity in response to conspecific skin extract compared to minnow skin extract or distilled water. Moreover, males and females responded differentially to conspecific skin extract. Males tended to occupy the top compartment of the tank, whereas females tended to occupy the bottom compartment and seek shelter more. In a second experiment swordtails reduced activity significantly more in response to swordtail skin extract compared to closely related guppy Poecilia reticulata skin extract, minnow skin extract or distilled water. Swordtails also reduced activity significantly more to guppy skin extract compared to minnow skin and distilled water. However, males and females did not respond differentially to guppy skin extract. This suggests that chemical alarm cues are partially conserved within the Poeciliidae, but the level of response is of lower intensity to heterospecific skin extracts.     

Overriding the oddity effect in mixed-species aggregations: group choice by armored and nonarmored prey

Because "odd" individuals often suffer disproportionately highrates of predation, solitary individuals should join groupswhose members are most similar to themselves in appearance.We examined group-choice decisions by individuals in armoredand nonarmored species and predicted that either (1) the oddityeffect would result in preference for conspecific groups forsolitary individuals of both species, or (2) individuals inthe armored species would prefer to associate with groups containingindividuals of the more vulnerable species. Armored brook sticklebacks(Culaea inconstans) and nonarmored fathead minnows (Pimephalespromelas) have the same predators and often occur together instreams. In mixed-species shoals, yellow perch (Perca flavescens)attacked minnows earlier and more often than sticklebacks. Wetested whether solitary minnows and sticklebacks preferred toassociate with conspecific or heterospecific shoals under conditionsof both low and high predation risk. When predation risk washigh, minnows preferred to associate with conspecifics overheterospecifics, as predicted by the oddity effect. In contrast,sticklebacks preferentially associated with groups of minnowsover groups of conspecifics when predation risk was high. Whenpredation risk was low, solitary individuals of both speciespreferentially associated with conspecific over heterospecificshoals. Stickleback shoal choices under low-risk conditionsmay have been influenced by interspecific competition for food.In feeding experiments, minnows were more efficient foragersthan sticklebacks, so it should benefit sticklebacks to avoidminnows unless predation risk is high. Therefore, for armoredprey, the benefits of associating with more vulnerable preyappear to override the costs of both the oddity effect and foodcompetition when predation risk is high.     

Motion, not Shape, Facilitates Association of Predation Risk with Novel Objects by Fathead Minnows (Pimephales promelas)

Injury‐released chemical cues are reliable indicators of predation risk among many aquatic taxa. When a novel, neutral stimulus is presented in tandem with chemical cues from an injured conspecific, an association is formed between the novel stimulus and apparent risk. Learned recognition of predation risk is well documented for fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. When minnows detect alarm cues in nature they are also potentially exposed to multiple environmental stimuli, few of which are likely to be relevant indicators of risk. How do minnows discern among candidate stimuli potentially associated with predation risk? Two possibilities are shape and motion. In this study, individual piscivore‐naïve minnows were presented simultaneously with conspecific chemical alarm cues and two stimulus objects. One object was a darkened tube with its long axis in the horizontal plane (fish‐like). The second object was a black disk. Following introduction of chemical alarm cues, one of the objects was raised and lowered repeatedly. After a single conditioning trial, minnows associated risk significantly more with the previously moving object than the previously stationary object, as indicated by reduced activity. Object shape had no significant effect on response intensity in test trials. Our data suggest that minnows have been selected to form aversive responses to moving objects at a site of recent predation because movement is a more predictable indicator of predator identity than shape.     

Population Differences in Responses of Fathead Minnows (Pimephales promelas) to Visual and Chemical Stimuli from Predators

Fathead minnows (Cyprinidae: Pimephales promelas) from a population that is sympatric with predatory northern pike (Esocidae: Esox lucius) exhibited a fright reaction to the visual stimulus of a live northern pike significantly more often than minnows from a population that is allopatric with pike. The fright response included increased use of shelter, dashing and freezing. Minnows from the pike-sympatric population also exhibited a significantly greater fright response, measured as a reduction in activity, following exposure to chemical stimuli from pike (i.e. water from a tank that had contained a pike) than did minnows from the pike-allopatric population. There was no significant change in activity by minnows from either population following exposure to chemical stimuli from nonpiscivorous peacock gudgeons (Eleotridae: Tateurndina ocellicauda), suggesting that the difference between the two populations is specific to stimuli from pike rather than a general difference in response to chemical stimuli from heterospecific fishes. Fathead minnows apparently utilize at least a two-tiered predator recognition system that incorporates both visual and chemical cues.     

Acquired Recognition of Predator Odour in the European Minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus)

Naive European minnows (Phoxinus phoxinus) do not show a fright reaction when they first encounter the odour of a natural predator (the pike: Esox lucius) or the odour of a non-piscivorous exotic (tilapia: Tilapia mariae). A conditioned fright response to both these odours will however develop if minnows experience them in a potentially dangerous situation, for example, in conjunction with Schreckstoff, the ostariophysian alarm pheromone. Although minnows respond to both odours the reaction to the tilapia odour is reduced. This suggests that a constraint on learning is involved. Olfactory recognition is particularly valuable for detecting predators that hunt in conditions where visibility is poor.     

Chemical Recognition of Risky Habitats is Culturally Transmitted among Fathead Minnows,Pimephales promelas (Osteichthyes,Cyprinidae)

Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) have an alarm substance (AS), or 'Schreckstoff', in epidermal club cells. Mechanical damage to the skin, as caused by a predator attack, releases the AS. The area in which conspecifics detect AS may be considered dangerous or risky because of the high probability of a subsequent predator attack. We exposed fathead minnows to water from one of two habitats (an open-water site and a vegetated-cover site) that we mixed with either AS or a distilled water control. Upon subsequent exposure to water from these habitats alone, minnows showed an antipredator response to the water they experienced in conjunction with AS, but not to water they received in conjunction with the distilled water control. These results confirmed that minnows can be conditioned with AS to recognize chemical cues from high-risk habitats. Naive minnows present during the fright response of conditioned minnows also exhibited antipredator behaviour, and subsequently responded when tested alone. Our results demonstrate that learned recognition of high-risk habitats can be transmitted culturally, which may allow minnows to lower their risk of predation.     

Sound the alarm: learned association of predation risk with novel auditory stimuli by fathead minnows ( Pimephales promelas ) and glowlight tetras ( Hemigrammus erythrozonus ) after single simultaneous pairings with conspecific chemical alarm cues

Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, and glowlight tetras, Hemigrammus erythrozonus, were tested for their ability to associate predation risk with novel auditory stimuli after auditory stimuli were presented simultaneously with chemical alarm cues. Minnows and tetras gave a fright response when exposed to skin extract (alarm cue) and an artificial auditory sound stimulus, but no response to water (control) and sound, indicating that they did not have a pre-existing aversion to the auditory stimulus. When retested with sound stimuli alone, minnows and glowlight tetras that had previously been conditioned with water and sound showed no response, but those that had been conditioned with alarm cues and sound exhibited antipredator behaviour (reduced activity) in response to the auditory cue. This is the first known demonstration of learned association of an auditory cue with predation risk, and raises questions about the role of sound in mediating predator-prey interactions in fishes.