Conformational specificity of the lac repressor coiled-coil tetramerization domain

Predictive understanding of how the folded, functional shape of a native protein is encoded in the linear sequence of its amino acid residues remains an unsolved challenge in modern structural biology. Antiparallel four-stranded coiled coils are relatively simple protein structures that embody a heptad sequence repeat and rich diversity for tertiary packing of alpha-helices. To explore specific sequence determinants of the lac repressor coiled-coil tetramerization domain, we have engineered a set of buried nonpolar side chains at the a-, d-, and e-positions into the hydrophobic interior of the dimeric GCN4 leucine zipper. Circular dichroism and equilibrium ultracentrifugation studies show that this core variant (GCN4-pAeLV) forms a stable tetrameric structure with a reversible and highly cooperative thermal unfolding transition. The X-ray crystal structure at 1.9 A reveals that GCN4-pAeLV is an antiparallel four-stranded coiled coil of the lac repressor type in which the a, d, and e side chains associate by means of combined knobs-against-knobs and knobs-into-holes packing with a characteristic interhelical offset of 0.25 heptad. Comparison of the side chain shape and packing in the antiparallel tetramers shows that the burial of alanine residues at the e positions between the neighboring helices of GCN4-pAeLV dictates both the antiparallel orientation and helix offset. This study fills in a gap in our knowledge of the determinants of structural specificity in antiparallel coiled coils and improves our understanding of how specific side chain packing forms the teritiary structure of a functional protein.     

Comparison of helix interactions in membrane and soluble alpha-bundle proteins

Helix-helix interactions are important for the folding, stability, and function of membrane proteins. Here, two independent and complementary methods are used to investigate the nature and distribution of amino acids that mediate helix-helix interactions in membrane and soluble alpha-bundle proteins. The first method characterizes the packing density of individual amino acids in helical proteins based on the van der Waals surface area occluded by surrounding atoms. We have recently used this method to show that transmembrane helices pack more tightly, on average, than helices in soluble proteins. These studies are extended here to characterize the packing of interfacial and noninterfacial amino acids and the packing of amino acids in the interfaces of helices that have either right- or left-handed crossing angles, and either parallel or antiparallel orientations. We show that the most abundant tightly packed interfacial residues in membrane proteins are Gly, Ala, and Ser, and that helices with left-handed crossing angles are more tightly packed on average than helices with right-handed crossing angles. The second method used to characterize helix-helix interactions involves the use of helix contact plots. We find that helices in membrane proteins exhibit a broader distribution of interhelical contacts than helices in soluble proteins. Both helical membrane and soluble proteins make use of a general motif for helix interactions that relies mainly on four residues (Leu, Ala, Ile, Val) to mediate helix interactions in a fashion characteristic of left-handed helical coiled coils. However, a second motif for mediating helix interactions is revealed by the high occurrence and high average packing values of small and polar residues (Ala, Gly, Ser, Thr) in the helix interfaces of membrane proteins. Finally, we show that there is a strong linear correlation between the occurrence of residues in helix-helix interfaces and their packing values, and discuss these results with respect to membrane protein structure prediction and membrane protein stability.     

Polar zippers

BACKGROUND: Certain proteins are known to form leucine zippers - alpha-helical coiled-coils in which the non-polar side chains of two leucine-rich helices intermesh. We recently presented the first evidence for a polar zipper, formed by the carboxy-terminal peptides of the eight subunits of Ascaris haemoglobin. The evidence was based on the presence of pairs of acidic residues alternating with pairs of basic residues ( + + - - ) in an amino-acid sequence that has since been shown to be incomplete. The complete sequence, derived from the haemoglobin's cDNA, now shows a self-complementary polar sequence extending along the entire length of its 24-residue carboxy-terminal peptide. RESULTS: From the complete sequence, it is clear that the eight identical subunits of the haemoglobin could be held together by an eight-stranded antiparallel beta barrel made up of the carboxy-terminal 24 residues of each of the subunits, such that each strand forms 10 salt bridges with each of its neighbours. A computer search of the protein database revealed similar, but shorter, + + - - repeats in several other proteins. It also revealed long repeats of alternating arginine and aspartate residues, and long stretches of only glutamines, or only serines, suggestive of several other kinds of polar zippers. CONCLUSION: Several proteins have amino-acid sequences that suggest the formation of polar zippers made of beta strands. These could form antiparallel pleated sheets linked together by hydrogen bonds between polar side chains both above and below the plane of the sheets. Polar zippers may be important in welding together oligomeric proteins which have subunits lacking the extensive complementary surfaces necessary for stability, or in promoting the association of functionally complementary proteins.     

Characterization of a membrane protein folding motif, the Ser zipper, using designed peptides

Polar residues play important roles in the association of transmembrane helices and the stabilities of membrane proteins. Although a single Ser residue in a transmembrane helix is unable to mediate a strong association of the helices, the cooperative interactions of two or more appropriately placed serine hydroxyl groups per helix has been hypothesized to allow formation of a "serine zipper" that can stabilize transmembrane helix association. In particular, a heptad repeat Sera Xxx Xxx Leud Xxx Xxx Xxx (Xxx is a hydrophobic amino acid) appears in both antiparallel helical pairs of polytopic membrane proteins as well as the parallel helical dimerization motif found in the murine erythropoietin receptor. To examine the intrinsic conformational preferences of this motif independent of its context within a larger protein, we synthesized a peptide containing three copies of a SeraLeud heptad motif. Computational results are consistent with the designed peptide adopting either a parallel or antiparallel structure, and conformational search calculations yield the parallel dimer as the lowest energy configuration, which is also significantly more stable than the parallel trimer. Analytical ultracentrifugation indicated that the peptide exists in a monomer-dimer equilibrium in dodecylphosphocholine micelles. Thiol disulfide interchange studies showed a preference for forming parallel dimers in micelles. In phospholipid vesicles, only the parallel dimer was formed. The stability of the SerZip peptide was studied in vesicles prepared from phosphatidylcholine (PC) lipids of different chain length: POPC (C16:0C18:1 PC) and DLPC (C12:0PC). The stability was greater in POPC, which has a good match between the length of the hydrophobic region of the peptide and the bilayer length. Finally, mutation to Ala of the Ser residues in the SerZip motif gave rise to a relatively small decrease in the stability of the dimer, indicating that packing interactions rather than hydrogen-bonding provided the primary driving force for association.     

Defining the minimum size of a hydrophobic cluster in two-stranded alpha-helical coiled-coils: effects on protein stability

The alpha-helical coiled-coil motif is characterized by a heptad repeat pattern (abcdefg)(n) in which residues a and d form the hydrophobic core. Long coiled-coils (e.g., tropomyosin, 284 residues per polypeptide chain) typically do not have a continuous hydrophobic core of stabilizing residues, but rather one that consists of alternating clusters of stabilizing and destabilizing residues. We have arbitrarily defined a cluster as a minimum of three consecutive stabilizing or destabilizing residues in the hydrophobic core. We report here on a series of two-stranded, disulfide-bridged parallel alpha-helical coiled-coils that contain a central cassette of three consecutive hydrophobic core positions (d, a, and d) with a destabilizing cluster of three consecutive Ala residues in the hydrophobic core on each side of the cassette. The effect of adding one to three stabilizing hydrophobes in these positions (Leu or Ile; denoted as [see text]) was investigated. Alanine residues (denoted as [see text]) are used to represent destabilizing residues. The peptide with three Ala residues in the d a d cassette positions ([see text]) was among the least stable coiled-coil (T(m) = 39.3 degrees C and Urea(1/2) = 1.9 M). Surprisingly, the addition of one stabilizing hydrophobe (Leu) to the cassette or two stabilizing hydrophobes (Leu), still interspersed by an Ala in the cassette ([see text]), also did not lead to any gain in stability. However, peptides with two adjacent hydrophobes in the cassette ([see text])([see text]) did show a gain in stability of 0.9 kcal/mole over the peptide with two interspersed hydrophobes ([see text]). Because the latter three peptides have the same inherent hydrophobicity, the juxtaposition of stabilizing hydrophobes leads to a synergistic effect, and thus a clustering effect. The addition of a third stabilizing hydrophobe to the cassette ([see text]) resulted in a further synergistic gain in stability of 1.7 kcal/mole (T(m) = 54.1 degrees C and Urea(1/2) = 3.3M). Therefore, the role of hydrophobicity in the hydrophobic core of coiled-coils is extremely context dependent and clustering is an important aspect of protein folding and stability.     

Relationships between sequence and structure for the four-alpha-helix bundle tertiary motif in proteins.

The sequences of four-alpha-helical bundle proteins are characterized by a pattern of hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids which is repeated every seven residues. At each position of the heptad repeat there are specific constraints on the amino acid properties which result from the topology of the tertiary motif. These constraints give rise to patterns of amino acid distribution which are distinct from those of other proteins. The distributions in each of the heptad positions have been determined by a statistical analysis of structural and sequence data derived from seven families of aligned protein sequences. The constitution of each position is dominated by a very small number of different amino acids, with the core positions consisting overwhelmingly of Leu and Ala. The positional preferences of the individual amino acids can be generally interpreted in terms of residue properties and topological constraints. The potential for four-alpha-helix bundle folding is reflected primarily in the pattern of residue occurrence in the heptad and not in the overall amino acid composition of the protein. Possible applications of this analysis in structure predictions, sequence alignments and in the rational design and engineering of four-alpha-helical bundle proteins are discussed.     

Nonpolar contributions to conformational specificity in assemblies of designed short helical peptides

A series of designed short helical peptides was used to study the effect of nonpolar interactions on conformational specificity. The consensus sequence was designed to obtain short helices (17 residues) and to minimize the presence of interhelical polar interactions. Furthermore, the sequence contained a heptad repeat (abcdefg), where positions a and d were occupied by hydrophobic residues Leu, Ile, or Val, and positions e and g were occupied by Ala. The peptides were named according to the identities of the residues in the adeg positions, respectively. The peptides llaa, liaa, ilaa, iiaa, ivaa, viaa, lvaa, vlaa, and vvaa were synthesized, and their characterization revealed marked differences in specificity. An experimental methodology was developed to study the nine peptides and their pairwise mixtures. These peptides and their mixtures formed a vast array of structural states, which may be classified as follows: helical tetramers and pentamers, soluble and insoluble helical aggregates, insoluble unstructured aggregates, and soluble unstructured monomers. The peptide liaa formed stable helical pentamers, and iiaa and vlaa formed stable helical tetramers. Disulfide cross-linking experiments indicated the presence of an antiparallel helix alignment in the helical pentamers and tetramers. Rates of amide proton exchange of the tetrameric form of vlaa were 10-fold slower than the calculated exchange rate for unfolded vlaa. In other work, the control of specificity has been attributed to polar interactions, especially buried polar interactions; this work demonstrated that subtle changes in the configuration of nonpolar interactions resulted in a large variation in the extent of conformational specificity of assemblies of designed short helical peptides. Thus, nonpolar interactions can have a significant effect on the conformational specificity of oligomeric short helices.     

Antiparallel four-stranded coiled coil specified by a 3-3-1 hydrophobic heptad repeat

Coiled-coil sequences in proteins commonly share a seven-amino acid repeat with nonpolar side chains at the first (a) and fourth (d) positions. We investigate here the role of a 3-3-1 hydrophobic repeat containing nonpolar amino acids at the a, d, and g positions in determining the structures of coiled coils using mutants of the GCN4 leucine zipper dimerization domain. When three charged residues at the g positions in the parental sequence are replaced by nonpolar alanine or valine side chains, stable four-helix structures result. The X-ray crystal structures of the tetramers reveal antiparallel, four-stranded coiled coils in which the a, d, and g side chains interlock in a combination of knobs-into-knobs and knobs-into-holes packing. Interfacial interactions in a coiled coil can therefore be prescribed by hydrophobic-polar patterns beyond the canonical 3-4 heptad repeat. The results suggest that the conserved, charged residues at the g positions in the GCN4 leucine zipper can impart a negative design element to disfavor thermodynamically more stable, antiparallel tetramers.     

Hepatitis C virus glycoprotein E2 contains a membrane-proximal heptad repeat sequence that is essential for E1E2 glycoprotein heterodimerization and viral entry

The E1 and E2 glycoproteins of hepatitis C virus form a noncovalently associated heterodimer that mediates viral entry. Glycoprotein E2 comprises a receptor-binding domain (residues 384-661) that is connected to the transmembrane domain (residues 716-746) via a highly conserved sequence containing a hydrophobic heptad repeat (residues 675-699). Alanine- and proline-scanning mutagenesis of the E2 heptad repeat revealed that Leu675, Ser678, Leu689, and Leu692 are important for E1E2 heterodimerization. Furthermore, Pro and Ala substitution of all but one heptad repeat residue (Ser678) blocked the entry of E1E2-HIV-1 pseudotypes into Huh7 cells, irrespective of an effect on heterodimerization. Two conserved prolines (Pro676 and Pro683), occupying consecutive b positions of the heptad, were not required for E1E2 heterodimerization; however, Pro683 was critical for viral entry. Thus, disruption of the predicted alpha-helical structure by proline at position 683 is important for E2 function. The inability of mutants to mediate viral entry was not explained by a loss of receptor binding function, because all mutants were able to interact with a recombinant form of the CD81 large extracellular loop. Chimeras formed between the E1 and E2 ectodomains and the transmembrane domains of flavivirus prM and E glycoproteins, respectively, were able to heterodimerize, although with lower efficiency in comparison with wild type E1E2. The heptad repeat of E2 therefore requires the native transmembrane domain for full heterodimerization and viral entry function. Our data indicate that the membraneproximal heptad repeat of E2 is functionally homologous to the stem of flavivirus E glycoproteins. We propose that E2 has mechanistic features in common with class II fusion proteins.     

Complementation of buried lysine and surface polar residues in a designed heterodimeric coiled coil

The coiled coil is an attractive target for protein design. The helices of coiled coils are characterized by a heptad repeat of residues denoted a to g. Residues at positions a and d form the interhelical interface and are usually hydrophobic. An established strategy to confer structural uniqueness to two-stranded coiled coils is the use of buried polar Asn residues at position a, which imparts dimerization and conformational specificity at the expense of stability. Here we show that polar interactions involving buried position-a Lys residues that can interact favorably only with surface e' or g' Glu residues also impart structural uniqueness to a designed heterodimeric coiled coil with the nativelike properties of sigmoidal thermal and urea-induced unfolding transitions, slow hydrogen exchange and lack of ANS binding. The position-a Lys residues do not, however, confer a single preference for helix orientation, likely reflecting the ability of Lys at position a to from favorable interactions with g' or e' Glu residues in the parallel and antiparallel orientations, respectively. The Lys-Glu polar interaction is less destabilizing than the Asn-Asn a-->a' interaction, presumably reflecting a higher desolvation penalty associated with the completely buried polar position-a groups. Our results extend the range of approaches for two-stranded coiled-coil design and illustrate the role of complementing polar groups associated with buried and surface positions of proteins in protein folding and design.     

Synthetic model proteins: the relative contribution of leucine residues at the nonequivalent positions of the 3-4 hydrophobic repeat to the stability of the two-stranded alpha-helical coiled-coil.

Our de novo designed coiled-coil model protein consists of two identical 35-residue polypeptide chains arranged in a parallel and in-register alignment via interchain hydrophobic interactions and a disulfide bridge at the position 2 between two helices. To quantitate the relative contribution of leucine residues at the nonequivalent position of the 3-4 hydrophobic repeat to the stability of the two-stranded alpha-helical coiled-coil, a single alanine was systematically substituted for a leucine in each chain at position "a" (9, 16, 23, or 30) or "d" (5, 12, 19, 26, or 33). The formation and stability of the coiled-coils were determined by circular dichroism studies in the absence and presence of guanidine hydrochloride. All the proteins with an alanine substituted at position a have a similar stability ([Gdn.HCl]1/2 ranges from 2.6 to 2.9 M), while all the proteins with an alanine substituted at position d have similar stability ([Gdn.HCl]1/2 ranges from 3.6 to 4.2 M), except for the proteins with an alanine substituted in the C-terminal heptad. The greater decrease in stability observed for a Leu----Ala mutation at position a (the average delta delta Gu value is 3.3 kcal/mol) compared to those where the substitution was effected at position d (the average delta delta Gu value is 2.0 kcal/mol) indicates that an Ala mutation at position a has a greater effect on the side-chain packing and hydrophobic interactions in the coiled-coil than an Ala mutation at position d.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Molecular dynamics simulations of the E1/E2 transmembrane domain of the Semliki Forest virus

Transmembrane (TM) helix-helix interactions are important for virus budding and fusion. We have developed a simulation strategy that reveals the main features of the helical packing between the TM domains of the two glycoproteins E1 and E2 of the alpha-virus Semliki Forest virus and that can be extrapolated to sketch TM helical packing in other alpha-viruses. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed in wild-type and mutant peptides, both isolated and forming E1/E2 complexes. The simulations revealed that the isolated wild-type E1 peptide formed a more flexible helix than the rest of peptides and that the wild-type E1/E2 complex consists of two helices that intimately pack their N-terminals. The residues located at the interhelical interface displayed the typical motif of the left-handed coiled-coils. These were small and medium residues as Gly, Ala, Ser, and Leu, which also had the possibility to form interhelical Calpha-H...O hydrogen bonds. Results from the mutant complexes suggested that correct packing is a compromise between these residues at both E1 and E2 interhelical interfaces. This compromise allowed prediction of E1-E2 contact residues in the TM spanning domain of other alphaviruses even though the sequence identity of E2 peptides is low in this domain.     

Effect of chain length on coiled-coil stability: decreasing stability with increasing chain length

The de novo design and biophysical characterization of three series of two-stranded alpha-helical coiled coils with different chain lengths are described. Our goal was to examine how increasing chain length would affect protein folding and stability when one or more heptad repeat(s) of K-A-E-A-L-E-G (gabcdef) was inserted into the central region of different coiled-coil host proteins. This heptad was designed to maintain the continuous 3-4 hydrophobic repeat of the coiled-coil host and introduce an Ala and Leu residue in the hydrophobic core at the a and d position, respectively, and a pair of stabilizing interchain ionic i to i' + 5 (g to e') interactions per heptad inserted. The secondary structures of the three series of disulfide-bridged polypeptides were studied by CD spectroscopy and their stabilities determined by chemical and thermal denaturation. The results showed that successive insertions of this heptad systematically decreased the stability of all the coiled coils studied regardless of the overall initial stability of the host coiled coil. These observations are in contrast to the generally accepted implication that the folding and stability of coiled coils are enhanced with increasing chain length. Our results imply that, in these examples where an Ala and Leu hydrophobic residue were introduced into the coiled-coil core per inserted heptad, there was still insufficient stability to overcome unfavorable entropy associated with chain length extension, even though the inserted heptad contained the most stabilizing hydrophobic residue (Leu) at position d and stabilizing ionic attractions.     

Dimerization of leucine zippers analyzed by random selection.

The leucine zipper is a coiled coil that mediates specific dimerization of bZIP DNA-binding domains. A hydrophobic spine involving the conserved leucines runs down the coiled-coil and is thought to stabilize the dimer. We used the method of random selection to further define the primary sequence requirements for homodimer formation and heterodimer formation with Fos. When positions on either side of the hydrophobic spine of GCN4 are diversified to include the corresponding residues of Jun, a large percentage of the resulting sequences form homodimers, and a large percentage form heterodimers with Fos. Basic residues were preferred, but not essential, at position e of zippers which heterodimerize with Fos. When random sequences containing 5 heptad repeat of leucines are subject to a selection for homodimer formation, a diverse set of sequences is isolated. Certain residues are preferred at each position in the heptad repeat, although no essential primary sequence determinants could be identified. No pair of residues not involving the conserved leucines could be identified which strongly promotes homodimerization. These results suggest that factors determining leucine zipper dimerization are complex, with numerous interactions contributing to the association.     

Assembly of Acanthamoeba myosin-II minifilaments. Definition of C-terminal residues required to form coiled-coils, dimers, and octamers

Acanthamoeba myosin-II forms bipolar octamers by three successive steps of dimerization of the C-terminal, coiled-coil tail. In this study, we generated N-terminal and C-terminal truncation constructs and point mutants of the Acanthamoeba myosin-II tail to delineate the structural requirements for assembly of bipolar mini-filaments. By the use of light-scattering, CD spectroscopy, analytical ultracentrifugation, and tryptophan fluorescence experiments, we determined that: (1) the C-terminal 14 heptad repeats plus most of the tailpiece (residues 1381-1509) are required to form antiparallel dimers of coiled-coils; (2) amino acid residues within heptads 23-32 (residues 1254-1325) are required to form tetramers; (3) the C-terminal 32 heptad repeats suffice to assemble octameric minifilaments; (4) A1378 is outside of the interaction interface; (5) the mutation L1475W inhibits dimerization; and (6) F1443 is involved in the dimerization interface but is exposed to the solvent. We propose that the tailpiece (residues 1483-1509) interacts with two heptads (13 and 14, residues 1381-1393), which are important for dimerization and coiled-coil formation. These results support a model in which hydrophobic as well as electrostatic interactions control the register between myosin-II coiled-coils and guide sequential steps of dimerization that generate stable, octameric mini-filaments.     

X-ray structure of a maquette scaffold

Maquettes are de novo designed mimicries of nature used to test the construction and engineering criteria of oxidoreductases. One type of scaffold used in maquette construction is a four-alpha-helical bundle. The sequence of the four-alpha-helix bundle maquettes follows a heptad repeat pattern typical of left-handed coiled-coils. Initial designs were molten globular due partly to the minimalist approach taken by the designers. Subsequent iterative redesign generated several structured scaffolds with similar heme binding properties. Variant [I(6)F(13)](2), a structured scaffold, was partially resolved with NMR spectroscopy and found to have a set of mobile inter-helical packing interfaces. Here, the X-ray structure of a similar peptide ([I(6)F(13)M(31)](2) i.e. ([CGGG EIWKL HEEFLKK FEELLKL HEERLKKM](2))(2) which we call L31M), has been solved using MAD phasing and refined to 2.8A resolution. The structure shows that the maquette scaffold is an anti-parallel four-helix bundle with "up-up-down-down" topology. No pre-formed heme-binding pocket exists in the protein scaffold. We report unexpected inter-helical crossing angles, residue positions and translations between the helices. The crossing angles between the parallel helices are -5 degrees rather than the expected +20 degrees for typical left-handed coiled-coils. Deviation of the scaffold from the design is likely due to the distribution and size of hydrophobic residues. The structure of L31M points out that four identical helices may interact differently in a bundle and heptad repeats with an alternating [HPPHHPP]/[HPPHHPH] (H: hydrophobic, P: polar) pattern are not a sufficient design criterion to generate left-hand coiled-coils.     

High-resolution solution structure of the double Cys2His2 zinc finger from the human enhancer binding protein MBP-1.

The high-resolution three-dimensional structure of a synthetic 57-residue peptide comprising the double zinc finger of the human enhancer binding protein MBP-1 has been determined in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on the basis of 1280 experimental restraints. A total of 30 simulated annealing structures were calculated. The backbone atomic root-mean-square distributions about the mean coordinate positions are 0.32 and 0.33 A for the N- and C-terminal fingers, respectively, and the corresponding values for all atoms, excluding disordered surface side chains, are 0.36 and 0.40 A. Each finger comprises an irregular antiparallel sheet and a helix, with the zinc tetrahedrally coordinated to two cysteines and two histidines. The overall structure is nonglobular in nature, and the angle between the long axes of the helices is 47 +/- 5 degrees. The long axis of the antiparallel sheet in the N-terminal finger is approximately parallel to that of the helix in the C-terminal finger. Comparison of this structure with the X-ray structure of the Zif-268 triple finger complexed with DNA indicates that the relative orientation of the individual zinc fingers is clearly distinct in the two cases. This difference can be attributed to the presence of a long Lys side chain in the C-terminal finger of MBP-1 at position 40, instead of a short Ala or Ser side chain at the equivalent position in Zif-268. This finding suggests that different contacts may be involved in the binding of the zinc fingers of MBP-1 and Zif-268 to DNA, consistent with the findings from methylation interference experiments that the two fingers of MBP-1 contact 10 base pairs, while the three fingers of Zif-268 contact only 9 base pairs.     

Oligomerization of the {gamma}-aminobutyric acid transporter-1 is driven by an interplay of polar and hydrophobic interactions in transmembrane helix II

The available evidence indicates that members of the neurotransmitter:sodium symporter family form constitutive oligomers. Their second transmembrane helix (TM2) contains a leucine heptad repeat proposed to be involved in oligomerization. In artificial transmembrane segments, interhelical interactions are stabilized by polar residues. We searched for these hydrogen bond donors in TM2 by mutating the five polar residues in TM2 of the gamma-aminobutyric acid transporter-1 (GAT1). We tested the ability of the resulting mutants to oligomerize by fluorescence microscopy, Foerster resonance energy transfer, and beta-lactamase fragment complementation. Of all generated mutants, only Y86A- (but not Y86F-), E101A-, E101Q-, and E101D-GAT1 were judged by these criteria to be deficient in oligomerization and were retained intracellularly. The observations are consistent with a model where the leucine heptad repeat in TM2 drives a homophilic association that is stabilized by Tyr(86) and Glu(101); Tyr(86) participates in hydrophobic stacking. Glu(101) is in the a-position of the leucine heptad repeat (where positions 1-7 are denoted a-g, and each leucine is in the central d-position). Thus, Glu(101) is in the position predicted for the hydrogen bond donor (i.e. sandwiched between Leu(97) and Leu(104), which are one helical turn above and below Glu(101)). These key residues, namely Tyr(86) and Glu(101), are conserved in related transporters from archaeae to humans; they are therefore likely to support oligomeric assembly in transporter orthologs and possibly other proteins with multiple transmembrane segments.