Cohesin and DNA damage repair

Replicated DNA molecules are physically connected by cohesin complexes from the time of their synthesis in S-phase until they are segregated during anaphase of the subsequent mitosis or meiosis. This sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic or meiotic spindle. In addition, cohesion is also essential during G2-phase of the cell cycle to allow repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Although cohesion can normally only be established during S-phase, recent work in yeast has shown that DNA double-strand breaks induce the recruitment of cohesin to the damage site and lead to the de novo formation of cohesion at this site. It is unknown if similar mechanisms operate in higher eukaryotes, but in mammalian cells phosphorylation of the cohesin subunit Smc1 by the protein kinase Atm has been shown to be important for DNA repair. We discuss how cohesin and sister chromatid cohesion might facilitate the repair of damaged DNA.     

SUMO化修饰与DNA损伤修复

蛋白质的翻译后修饰在很大程度上决定了蛋白质的活性、细胞定位、稳定性及蛋白质之间的相互作用.而在DNA损伤修复过程中,通过调控不同修复蛋白的翻译后修饰来影响他们的活性及细胞定位,进而导致DNA损伤修复途径的不同和修复结果的差异.新近研究表明,蛋白质的SUMO化修饰在DNA损伤修复和基因组稳定性的维护方面发挥重要作用.本文将对SUMO化修饰对DNA损伤修复的调控的最新研究进展做一综述.     

DNA repair: bioinformatics helps reverse methylation damage

Recent work has uncovered a novel DNA repair enzyme: the AlkB protein of Escherichia coli, which oxidises the methyl groups of 1-methyladenine and 3-methylcytosine to hydroxymethyl moieties; the oxidised groups are subsequently released as formaldehyde, regenerating the unmodified bases.     

DNA damage and repair: consequences on dose-responses

Damage to DNA is considered to be the main initiating event by which genotoxins cause hereditary effects and cancer. Single or double strand breaks, bases modifications or deletions, intra- or interstrand DNA-DNA or DNA-protein cross-links constitute the major lesions formed in different proportions according to agents and to DNA sequence context. They can result in cell death or in mutational events which in turn may initiate malignant transformation. Normal cells are able to repair these lesions with fidelity or by introducing errors. Base excision (BER) and nucleotide excision (NER) repair are error-free processes acting on the simpler forms of DNA damage. A specialized form of BER involves the removal of mismatched DNA bases occurring as errors of DNA replication or from miscoding properties of damaged bases. Severe damage will be repaired according to several types of recombinational processes: homologous, illegitimate and site-specific recombination pathways. The loss of repair capacity as seen in a number of human genetic diseases and mutant cell lines leads to hypersensitivity to environmental agents. Repair-defective cells show qualitative (mutation spectrum) and quantitative alterations in dose-effect relationships. For such repair-deficient systems, direct measurements at low doses are possible and the extrapolation from large to low doses fits well with the linear or the linear-quadratic no-threshold models. Extensive debate still takes place as to the shape of the dose-response relationships in the region at which genetic effects are not directly detectable in repair-proficient normal cells. Comparison of repair mutants and wild-type organisms pragmatically suggests that, for many genotoxins and tissues, very low doses may have no effect at all in normal cells.     

Peptide repair of oxidative DNA damage

Guanyl radical species are produced in DNA by electron removal caused by ionizing radiation, photoionization, oxidation, or photosensitization. DNA guanyl radicals can be reduced by electron donation from mild reducing agents. Important biologically relevant examples are the redox active amino acids cysteine, cystine, methionine, tryptophan, and tyrosine. We have quantified the reactivity of derivatives of these amino acids with guanyl radicals located in plasmid DNA. The radicals were produced by electron removal using the single electron oxidizing agent (SCN)(2)(*)(-). Disulfides (cystine) are unreactive. Thioethers (methionine), thiols (cysteine), and phenols (tyrosine) react with rate constants in the range 10(4)-10(6), 10(5)-10(6), and 10(5)-10(6) dm(3) mol(-1) s(-1), respectively. Indoles (tryptophan) are the most reactive with rate constants of 10(7)-10(8) dm(3) mol(-1) s(-1). Selenium analogues of amino acids are over an order of magnitude more reactive than their sulfur equivalents. Increasing positive charge is associated with a ca. 10-fold increase in reactivity. The results suggest that amino acid residues located close to DNA (for example, in DNA binding proteins such as histones) might participate in the repair of oxidative DNA damage.     

The repair of G-quadruplex-induced DNA damage

G4 DNA motifs, which can form stable secondary structures called G-quadruplexes, are ubiquitous in eukaryotic genomes, and have been shown to cause genomic instability. Specialized helicases that unwind G-quadruplexes in vitro have been identified, and they have been shown to prevent genetic instability in vivo. In the absence of these helicases, G-quadruplexes can persist and cause replication fork stalling and collapse. Translesion synthesis (TLS) and homologous recombination (HR) have been proposed to play a role in the repair of this damage, but recently it was found in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that G4-induced genome alterations are generated by an error-prone repair mechanism that is dependent on the A-family polymerase Theta (Pol θ). Current data point towards a scenario where DNA replication blocked at G-quadruplexes causes DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), and where the choice of repair pathway that can act on these breaks dictates the nature of genomic alterations that are observed in various organisms.     

Acute skin sun damage in children and its consequences in adults

Children spend more time outdoors than adults and there is compelling evidence that childhood is a particularly vulnerable time for the photocarcinogenic effects of the sun. The negative effects of solar radiation are accumulated during the entire lifetime; however 80% of total lifetime sun exposure is taking place before the age of 18 years. Child skin is more sensitive than adult skin because natural defense mechanisms are not fully developed. A short exposure to midday sun will result in sunburns. Epidemiologic studies show a higher incidence of malignant melanoma in persons with a history of sunburns during childhood and adolescence. Sun exposure among infants and pre-school children is largely dependent on the discretion of adult care providers. Sun protective habits of mothers may predict the level of sun exposure in children. It is very important to transfer the knowledge and positive habits of proper sun protection to children. The purpose of sun-safety behavior is not to avoid outdoor activities, but rather to protect the skin from detrimental sun effects. Proper sun protection of children includes protection from excessive sun exposure, sunburns and other forms of skin damage caused by sun, which may lead to the future development of skin cancers. This paper reviews acute skin reactivity to sun in childhood and adolescence that causes damage in skin structure and function and produces undesirable chronic changes in adults.     

Excision repair of DNA base damage

Exposure of cells to exogenous physical and chemical agents can result in damage to the DNA bases. DNA damage can lead to mutation, malignant transformation and cell death and may possibly be involved in cellular aging. Structurally related base modifications are expected to have similar biological effects regardless of the agent responsible for their formation. The biological effects may be a consequence of the local distortion of the DNA conformation by the lesion rather than of the chemical properties of the modified base $\text{per se}$. It may be useful, therefore, to classify DNA base damage according to their effect on DNA conformation. The elucidation of the structures of the DNA lesions produced $\text{in situ}$ in the living cell represents a prerequisite for the correlation of specific lesions with the biological effects and for the study of the cellular repair processes.Excision repair represents an ubiquitous mechanism in cells for the removal of damaged residues from the DNA. The most specific first step in excision repair is the recognition of the damage by an endonuclease followed by incision of the damaged DNA strand in the proximity of the damage. Several “repair endonucleases” have been characterized from bacteria while the search for the corresponding mammalian enzymes is only beginning. The second, probably less specific step, is the exonucleolytic degradation of the damaged portion of the DNA leading to the removal of the damaged residue. In $\text{E. coli}$ the removal of both cyclobutane-type photodimers and γ-ray products of the 5,6-dihydroxy-dihydrothymine type is accomplished by the 5′→3′ exonuclease associated with polymerase I. All three $\text{E. coli}$ polymerases appear to participate in the rebuilding of the degraded portion of the DNA. Studies on the corresponding enzymes in mammalian cells have been initiated. The last step of exicison repair involves the sealing of a phosphodiester bond of the DNA backbone and is accomplished by the enzyme polynucleotide ligase in bacterial and mammalian cells.     

Radiation-induced DNA damage and its repair

Application of modern methods of organic chemistry and recombinant DNA technologies has provided new insights in the field of DNA radiation damage and its repair. An overview of the chemical nature of the lesions inflicted on DNA by ionizing radiation is presented. The structures of 29 different DNA modified base or sugar residues are shown in comprehensive formation schemes. A fraction of radiation-induced modified bases is spontaneously released from the DNA chain during irradiation. Another part remains attached to the DNA chain backbone and for its characterization mild formic acid or enzymatic hydrolysis have been used. Starting from the chemical formulae of the altered base residues, the specific repair enzymes and their modes of action are discussed. Various glycosylases and endonucleases have been purified to homogeneity, and in some cases the gene which encodes the protein cloned. Using methods derived from Maxam and Gilbert sequencing procedures and DNA fragment 32P-labelled at one end, it has been shown that the alkali-labile sites in DNA induced by radiation are strongly dependent on the DNA base sequence. Enzymatic methods have been used to analyse the DNA base defects produced by gamma-irradiation of cells under in vivo conditions. Structures of modified bases were the same as those observed when DNA was irradiated in aqueous solution.     

DNA damage checkpoint and repair centers

In eukaryotes, recombinational repair is choreographed by multiprotein complexes that are organized into focal assemblies. These foci are highly dynamic giga-dalton structures capable of simultaneously repairing multiple DNA lesions. Moreover, the composition of these repair centers depends on the nature of the DNA lesion and is tightly coordinated with progression of the cell cycle. Components of DNA repair centers are regulated by post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination and sumoylation. Repair foci progress through four distinct stages: first, DNA damage recognition and binding of DNA ends by the Mre11 complex and Ku70/80; second, end-processing and binding of single-stranded DNA by replication protein A, which recruits checkpoint proteins; third, recombinational repair during S and G(2) phase; and fourth, disassembly of foci and resumption of the cell cycle.     

Mismatch repair and DNA damage signalling

Postreplicative mismatch repair (MMR) increases the fidelity of DNA replication by up to three orders of magnitude, through correcting DNA polymerase errors that escaped proofreading. MMR also controls homologous recombination (HR) by aborting strand exchange between divergent DNA sequences. In recent years, MMR has also been implicated in the response of mammalian cells to DNA damaging agents. Thus, MMR-deficient cells were shown to be around 100-fold more resistant to killing by methylating agents of the S(N)1type than cells with functional MMR. In the case of cisplatin, the sensitivity difference was lower, typically two- to three-fold, but was observed in all matched MMR-proficient and -deficient cell pairs. More controversial is the role of MMR in cellular response to other DNA damaging agents, such as ionizing radiation (IR), topoisomerase poisons, antimetabolites, UV radiation and DNA intercalators. The MMR-dependent DNA damage signalling pathways activated by the above agents are also ill-defined. To date, signalling cascades involving the Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR), as well as the stress-activated kinases JNK/SAPK and p38alpha have been linked with methylating agent and 6-thioguanine (TG) treatments, while cisplatin damage was reported to activate the c-Abl and JNK/SAPK kinases in MMR-dependent manner. MMR defects are found in several different cancer types, both familiar and sporadic, and it is possible that the involvement of the MMR system in DNA damage signalling play an important role in transformation. The scope of this article is to provide a brief overview of the recent literature on this subject and to raise questions that could be addressed in future studies.     

Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage by DNA glycosylases

Oxidative damage to DNA caused by free radicals and other oxidants generate base and sugar damage, strand breaks, clustered sites, tandem lesions and DNA-protein cross-links. Oxidative DNA damage is mainly repaired by base-excision repair in living cells with the involvement of DNA glycosylases in the first step and other enzymes in subsequent steps. DNA glycosylases remove modified bases from DNA, generating an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. Some of these enzymes that remove oxidatively modified DNA bases also possess AP-lyase activity to cleave DNA at AP sites. DNA glycosylases possess varying substrate specificities, and some of them exhibit cross-activity for removal of both pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. Most studies on substrate specificities and excision kinetics of DNA glycosylases were performed using oligonucleotides with a single modified base incorporated at a specific position. Other studies used high-molecular weight DNA containing multiple pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. In this case, substrate specificities and excision kinetics were found to be different from those observed with oligonucleotides. This paper reviews substrate specificities and excision kinetics of DNA glycosylases for removal of pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions in high-molecular weight DNA.     

DNA repair: models for damage and mismatch recognition

Maintaining the integrity of the genome is critical for the survival of any organism. To achieve this, many families of enzymatic repair systems which recognize and repair DNA damage have evolved. Perhaps most intriguing about the workings of these repair systems is the actual damage recognition process. What are the chemical characteristics which are common to sites of nucleic acid damage that DNA repair proteins may exploit in targeting sites? Importantly, thermodynamic and kinetic principles, as much as structural factors, make damage sites distinct from the native DNA bases, and indeed, in many cases, these are the features which are believed to be exploited by repair enzymes. Current proposals for damage recognition may not fulfill all of the demands required of enzymatic repair systems given the sheer size of many genomes, and the efficiency with which the genome is screened for damage. Here we discuss current models for how DNA damage recognition may occur and the chemical characteristics, shared by damaged DNA sites, of which repair proteins may take advantage. These include recognition based upon the thermodynamic and kinetic instabilities associated with aberrant sites. Additionally, we describe how small changes in base pair structure can alter also the unique electronic properties of the DNA base pair pi-stack. Further, we describe photophysical, electrochemical, and biochemical experiments in which mismatches and other local perturbations in structure are detected using DNA-mediated charge transport. Finally, we speculate as to how this DNA electron transfer chemistry might be exploited by repair enzymes in order to scan the genome for sites of damage.     

Genotoxic stress in plants: shedding light on DNA damage, repair and DNA repair helicases

Plant cells are constantly exposed to environmental agents and endogenous processes that inflict damage to DNA and cause genotoxic stress, which can reduce plant genome stability, growth and productivity. Plants are most affected by solar UV-B radiation, which damage the DNA by inducing the formation of two main UV photoproducts such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4PPs). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also generated extra- or intra-cellularly, which constitute yet another source of genotoxic stress. As a result of this stress, the cellular DNA-damage responses (DDR) are activated, which transiently arrest the cell cycle and allow cells to repair DNA before proceeding into mitosis. DDR requires the activation of Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and Rad3-related (ATR) genes, which regulate the cell cycle and transmit the damage signals to downstream effectors of cell-cycle progression. Since genomic protection and stability are fundamental to ensure and sustain plant diversity and productivity, therefore, repair of DNA damages is essential. In plants the bulky DNA lesions, CPDs and 6-4PPs, are repaired by a simple and error-free mechanism: photoreactivation, which is a light-dependent mechanism and requires CPD or 6-4PP specific photolyases. In addition to this direct repair process, the plants also have sophisticated light-independent general repair mechanisms, such as the nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER). The completed plant genome sequences reveal that most of the genes involved in NER and BER are present in higher plants, which suggests that the network of in-built DNA-damage repair mechanisms is conserved. This article describes the insight underlying the DNA damage and repair pathways in plants. The comet assay to measure the DNA damage and the role of DNA repair helicases such as XPD and XPB are also covered.     

Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance

Homologous recombination （HR） comprises a series of interrelated pathways that function in the repair of DNA double-stranded breaks （DSBs） and interstrand crosslinks （ICLs）. In addition, recombination provides critical support for DNA replication in the recovery of stalled or broken replication forks, contributing to tolerance of DNA damage. A central core of proteins, most critically the RecA homolog Rad51, catalyzes the key reactions that typify HR： homology search and DNA strand invasion. The diverse functions of recombination are reflected in the need for context-specific factors that perform supplemental functions in conjunction with the core proteins. The inability to properly repair complex DNA damage and resolve DNA replication stress leads to genomic instability and contributes to cancer etiology. Mutations in the BRCA2 recombination gene cause predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer as well as Fanconi anemia, a cancer predisposition syndrome characterized by a defect in the repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks. The cellular functions of recombination are also germane to DNA-based treatment modalities of cancer, which target replicating cells by the direct or indirect induction of DNA lesions that are substrates for recombination pathways. This review focuses on mechanistic aspects of HR relating to DSB and ICL repair as well as replication fork support.     

DNA damage, homology-directed repair, and DNA methylation

To explore the link between DNA damage and gene silencing, we induced a DNA double-strand break in the genome of Hela or mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells using I-SceI restriction endonuclease. The I-SceI site lies within one copy of two inactivated tandem repeated green fluorescent protein (GFP) genes (DR-GFP). A total of 2%–4% of the cells generated a functional GFP by homology-directed repair (HR) and gene conversion. However, ~50% of these recombinants expressed GFP poorly. Silencing was rapid and associated with HR and DNA methylation of the recombinant gene, since it was prevented in Hela cells by 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. ES cells deficient in DNA methyl transferase 1 yielded as many recombinants as wild-type cells, but most of these recombinants expressed GFP robustly. Half of the HR DNA molecules were de novo methylated, principally downstream to the double-strand break, and half were undermethylated relative to the uncut DNA. Methylation of the repaired gene was independent of the methylation status of the converting template. The methylation pattern of recombinant molecules derived from pools of cells carrying DR-GFP at different loci, or from an individual clone carrying DR-GFP at a single locus, was comparable. ClustalW analysis of the sequenced GFP molecules in Hela and ES cells distinguished recombinant and nonrecombinant DNA solely on the basis of their methylation profile and indicated that HR superimposed novel methylation profiles on top of the old patterns. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA analysis revealed that DNA methyl transferase 1 was bound specifically to HR GFP DNA and that methylation of the repaired segment contributed to the silencing of GFP expression. Taken together, our data support a mechanistic link between HR and DNA methylation and suggest that DNA methylation in eukaryotes marks homologous recombined segments.     

DNA repair efficiency for ultraviolet induced damage

Ultraviolet radiation causes lesions in bacterial DNA which are repaired by several enzyme systems. Wide variations in the efficiency of repair for differentE. Coli strains are inadequately explained by a simple presence or absence of one or more repair systems. It is proposed that a major factor in the variations is the sensitivity of the repair systems themselves to ultraviolet induced interactions between proteins and the repair enzyme cistrons. An analytic approach is applied to pre-existing data to establish the numbers of thymine and cytosine bases in the repair cistrons, lending support to the model. The findings imply that bacteria will become sensitive to UV upon inhibition of one of four amino acids.     

SUMO化修饰与DNA损伤修复

由于体内外因素的影响,DNA损伤是生物生命周期中的常见现象,如果得不到及时的修复,DNA损伤的积累将导致基因组的不稳定及染色质的异常,并可能导致肿瘤的发生发展。SUMO化修饰是体内一个重要的蛋白质翻译后修饰,越来越多的研究发现SUMO化修饰与多个参与DNA损伤反应、维持基因组稳定的蛋白质相关,有可能参与肿瘤的发生。本文将阐述SUMO化修饰与DNA损伤修复的关系。     

DNA repair, damage signaling and carcinogenesis

The First joint meeting of the German DGDR (German Society for Research on DNA Repair) and the French SFTG (French Society of Genotoxicology) on DNA Repair was held in Toulouse, France, from September 15 to 19, 2007. It was organized by Lisa Wiesmüller and Bernard Salles together with the scientific committee consisting of Gilbert de Murcia, Jean-Marc Egly, Frank Grosse, Karl-Peter Hopfner, Georges Iliakis, Bernd Kaina, Markus Löbrich, Bernard Lopez, Daniel Marzin and Alain Sarasin. This report summarizes information presented by the speakers (invited lectures and oral communications) during the seven plenary sessions, which include (1) excision repair, (2) DNA repair and carcinogenesis, (3) double-strand break repair, (4) replication in repair and lesion bypass, (5) cellular responses to genotoxic stress, (6) DNA repair machinery within the chromatin context and (7) genotoxicology and testing. A total of 23 plenary lectures, 32 oral communications and 66 posters were presented in this rather intense 4 days meeting, which stimulated extensive discussions and highly interdisciplinary scientific exchanges among the ∼250 participants.