Green tea prevents non-melanoma skin cancer by enhancing DNA repair

Excessive exposure of the skin to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation is one of the major factors for the development of skin cancers, including non-melanoma. For the last several centuries the consumption of dietary phytochemicals has been linked to numerous health benefits including the photoprotection of the skin. Green tea has been consumed as a popular beverage world-wide and skin photoprotection by green tea polyphenols (GTPs) has been widely investigated. In this article, we have discussed the recent investigations and mechanistic studies which define the potential efficacy of GTPs on the prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer. UV-induced DNA damage, particularly the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, has been implicated in immunosuppression and initiation of skin cancer. Topical application or oral administration of green tea through drinking water of mice prevents UVB-induced skin tumor development, and this prevention is mediated, at least in part, through rapid repair of DNA. The DNA repair by GTPs is mediated through the induction of interleukin (IL)-12 which has been shown to have DNA repair ability. The new mechanistic investigations support and explain the anti-photocarcinogenic activity, in particular anti-non-melanoma skin cancer, of green tea and explain the benefits of green tea for human health.     

Surviving the sun: repair and bypass of DNA UV lesions

Structural studies of UV-induced lesions and their complexes with repair proteins reveal an intrinsic flexibility of DNA at lesion sites. Reduced DNA rigidity stems primarily from the loss of base stacking, which may manifest as bending, unwinding, base unstacking, or flipping out. The intrinsic flexibility at UV lesions allows efficient initial lesion recognition within a pool of millions to billions of normal DNA base pairs. To bypass the damaged site by translesion synthesis, the specialized DNA polymerase η acts like a molecular "splint" and reinforces B-form DNA by numerous protein-phosphate interactions. Photolyases and glycosylases that specifically repair UV lesions interact directly with UV lesions in bent DNA via surface complementation. UvrA and UvrB, which recognize a variety of lesions in the bacterial nucleotide excision repair pathway, appear to exploit hysteresis exhibited by DNA lesions and conduct an ATP-dependent stress test to distort and separate DNA strands. Similar stress tests are likely conducted in eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair.     

Chromatin and DNA damage repair

In eukaryotic cells, inheritance of both exact DNA sequence and its arrangement into the chromatin is critical for maintaining stability of the genome. Various DNA lesions induced by endogenous and exogenous factors make this maintanance problematic. To understand completely how cells resolve this problem the knowledge on the nature of these lesions, their detection, and repair within the chromatin environment should be integrated. Understanding of these processes is complicated by multiple types of DNA lesions and repair pathways, as well as the intricate organization of the chromatin. Recent advances in all these directions help to get insight on the repair regulation of DNA within the chromatin at the molecular and cellular level.     

SUMO化修饰与DNA损伤修复

蛋白质的翻译后修饰在很大程度上决定了蛋白质的活性、细胞定位、稳定性及蛋白质之间的相互作用.而在DNA损伤修复过程中,通过调控不同修复蛋白的翻译后修饰来影响他们的活性及细胞定位,进而导致DNA损伤修复途径的不同和修复结果的差异.新近研究表明,蛋白质的SUMO化修饰在DNA损伤修复和基因组稳定性的维护方面发挥重要作用.本文将对SUMO化修饰对DNA损伤修复的调控的最新研究进展做一综述.     

Cohesin and DNA damage repair

Replicated DNA molecules are physically connected by cohesin complexes from the time of their synthesis in S-phase until they are segregated during anaphase of the subsequent mitosis or meiosis. This sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic or meiotic spindle. In addition, cohesion is also essential during G2-phase of the cell cycle to allow repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Although cohesion can normally only be established during S-phase, recent work in yeast has shown that DNA double-strand breaks induce the recruitment of cohesin to the damage site and lead to the de novo formation of cohesion at this site. It is unknown if similar mechanisms operate in higher eukaryotes, but in mammalian cells phosphorylation of the cohesin subunit Smc1 by the protein kinase Atm has been shown to be important for DNA repair. We discuss how cohesin and sister chromatid cohesion might facilitate the repair of damaged DNA.     

XRCC1 stimulates polynucleotide kinase by enhancing its damage discrimination and displacement from DNA repair intermediates

Human polynucleotide kinase (hPNK) is required for processing and rejoining DNA strand break termini. The 5'-DNA kinase and 3'-phosphatase activities of hPNK can be stimulated by the "scaffold" protein XRCC1, but the mechanism remains to be fully elucidated. Using a variety of fluorescence techniques, we examined the interaction of hPNK with XRCC1 and substrates that model DNA single-strand breaks. hPNK binding to substrates with 5'-OH termini was only approximately 5-fold tighter than that to identical DNA molecules with 5'-phosphate termini, suggesting that hPNK remains bound to the product of its enzymatic activity. The presence of XRCC1 did not influence the binding of hPNK to substrates with 5'-OH termini, but sharply reduced the interaction of hPNK with DNA bearing a 5'-phosphate terminus. These data, together with kinetic data obtained at limiting enzyme concentration, indicate a dual function for the interaction of XRCC1 with hPNK. First, XRCC1 enhances the capacity of hPNK to discriminate between strand breaks with 5'-OH termini and those with 5'-phosphate termini; and second, XRCC1 stimulates hPNK activity by displacing hPNK from the phosphorylated DNA product.     

DNA damage and repair: consequences on dose-responses

Damage to DNA is considered to be the main initiating event by which genotoxins cause hereditary effects and cancer. Single or double strand breaks, bases modifications or deletions, intra- or interstrand DNA-DNA or DNA-protein cross-links constitute the major lesions formed in different proportions according to agents and to DNA sequence context. They can result in cell death or in mutational events which in turn may initiate malignant transformation. Normal cells are able to repair these lesions with fidelity or by introducing errors. Base excision (BER) and nucleotide excision (NER) repair are error-free processes acting on the simpler forms of DNA damage. A specialized form of BER involves the removal of mismatched DNA bases occurring as errors of DNA replication or from miscoding properties of damaged bases. Severe damage will be repaired according to several types of recombinational processes: homologous, illegitimate and site-specific recombination pathways. The loss of repair capacity as seen in a number of human genetic diseases and mutant cell lines leads to hypersensitivity to environmental agents. Repair-defective cells show qualitative (mutation spectrum) and quantitative alterations in dose-effect relationships. For such repair-deficient systems, direct measurements at low doses are possible and the extrapolation from large to low doses fits well with the linear or the linear-quadratic no-threshold models. Extensive debate still takes place as to the shape of the dose-response relationships in the region at which genetic effects are not directly detectable in repair-proficient normal cells. Comparison of repair mutants and wild-type organisms pragmatically suggests that, for many genotoxins and tissues, very low doses may have no effect at all in normal cells.     

DNA repair: bioinformatics helps reverse methylation damage

Recent work has uncovered a novel DNA repair enzyme: the AlkB protein of Escherichia coli, which oxidises the methyl groups of 1-methyladenine and 3-methylcytosine to hydroxymethyl moieties; the oxidised groups are subsequently released as formaldehyde, regenerating the unmodified bases.     

The repair of G-quadruplex-induced DNA damage

G4 DNA motifs, which can form stable secondary structures called G-quadruplexes, are ubiquitous in eukaryotic genomes, and have been shown to cause genomic instability. Specialized helicases that unwind G-quadruplexes in vitro have been identified, and they have been shown to prevent genetic instability in vivo. In the absence of these helicases, G-quadruplexes can persist and cause replication fork stalling and collapse. Translesion synthesis (TLS) and homologous recombination (HR) have been proposed to play a role in the repair of this damage, but recently it was found in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that G4-induced genome alterations are generated by an error-prone repair mechanism that is dependent on the A-family polymerase Theta (Pol θ). Current data point towards a scenario where DNA replication blocked at G-quadruplexes causes DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), and where the choice of repair pathway that can act on these breaks dictates the nature of genomic alterations that are observed in various organisms.     

Excision repair of DNA base damage

Exposure of cells to exogenous physical and chemical agents can result in damage to the DNA bases. DNA damage can lead to mutation, malignant transformation and cell death and may possibly be involved in cellular aging. Structurally related base modifications are expected to have similar biological effects regardless of the agent responsible for their formation. The biological effects may be a consequence of the local distortion of the DNA conformation by the lesion rather than of the chemical properties of the modified base $\text{per se}$. It may be useful, therefore, to classify DNA base damage according to their effect on DNA conformation. The elucidation of the structures of the DNA lesions produced $\text{in situ}$ in the living cell represents a prerequisite for the correlation of specific lesions with the biological effects and for the study of the cellular repair processes.Excision repair represents an ubiquitous mechanism in cells for the removal of damaged residues from the DNA. The most specific first step in excision repair is the recognition of the damage by an endonuclease followed by incision of the damaged DNA strand in the proximity of the damage. Several “repair endonucleases” have been characterized from bacteria while the search for the corresponding mammalian enzymes is only beginning. The second, probably less specific step, is the exonucleolytic degradation of the damaged portion of the DNA leading to the removal of the damaged residue. In $\text{E. coli}$ the removal of both cyclobutane-type photodimers and γ-ray products of the 5,6-dihydroxy-dihydrothymine type is accomplished by the 5′→3′ exonuclease associated with polymerase I. All three $\text{E. coli}$ polymerases appear to participate in the rebuilding of the degraded portion of the DNA. Studies on the corresponding enzymes in mammalian cells have been initiated. The last step of exicison repair involves the sealing of a phosphodiester bond of the DNA backbone and is accomplished by the enzyme polynucleotide ligase in bacterial and mammalian cells.     

Peptide repair of oxidative DNA damage

Guanyl radical species are produced in DNA by electron removal caused by ionizing radiation, photoionization, oxidation, or photosensitization. DNA guanyl radicals can be reduced by electron donation from mild reducing agents. Important biologically relevant examples are the redox active amino acids cysteine, cystine, methionine, tryptophan, and tyrosine. We have quantified the reactivity of derivatives of these amino acids with guanyl radicals located in plasmid DNA. The radicals were produced by electron removal using the single electron oxidizing agent (SCN)(2)(*)(-). Disulfides (cystine) are unreactive. Thioethers (methionine), thiols (cysteine), and phenols (tyrosine) react with rate constants in the range 10(4)-10(6), 10(5)-10(6), and 10(5)-10(6) dm(3) mol(-1) s(-1), respectively. Indoles (tryptophan) are the most reactive with rate constants of 10(7)-10(8) dm(3) mol(-1) s(-1). Selenium analogues of amino acids are over an order of magnitude more reactive than their sulfur equivalents. Increasing positive charge is associated with a ca. 10-fold increase in reactivity. The results suggest that amino acid residues located close to DNA (for example, in DNA binding proteins such as histones) might participate in the repair of oxidative DNA damage.     

Acute skin sun damage in children and its consequences in adults

Children spend more time outdoors than adults and there is compelling evidence that childhood is a particularly vulnerable time for the photocarcinogenic effects of the sun. The negative effects of solar radiation are accumulated during the entire lifetime; however 80% of total lifetime sun exposure is taking place before the age of 18 years. Child skin is more sensitive than adult skin because natural defense mechanisms are not fully developed. A short exposure to midday sun will result in sunburns. Epidemiologic studies show a higher incidence of malignant melanoma in persons with a history of sunburns during childhood and adolescence. Sun exposure among infants and pre-school children is largely dependent on the discretion of adult care providers. Sun protective habits of mothers may predict the level of sun exposure in children. It is very important to transfer the knowledge and positive habits of proper sun protection to children. The purpose of sun-safety behavior is not to avoid outdoor activities, but rather to protect the skin from detrimental sun effects. Proper sun protection of children includes protection from excessive sun exposure, sunburns and other forms of skin damage caused by sun, which may lead to the future development of skin cancers. This paper reviews acute skin reactivity to sun in childhood and adolescence that causes damage in skin structure and function and produces undesirable chronic changes in adults.     

Mismatch repair and DNA damage signalling

Postreplicative mismatch repair (MMR) increases the fidelity of DNA replication by up to three orders of magnitude, through correcting DNA polymerase errors that escaped proofreading. MMR also controls homologous recombination (HR) by aborting strand exchange between divergent DNA sequences. In recent years, MMR has also been implicated in the response of mammalian cells to DNA damaging agents. Thus, MMR-deficient cells were shown to be around 100-fold more resistant to killing by methylating agents of the S(N)1type than cells with functional MMR. In the case of cisplatin, the sensitivity difference was lower, typically two- to three-fold, but was observed in all matched MMR-proficient and -deficient cell pairs. More controversial is the role of MMR in cellular response to other DNA damaging agents, such as ionizing radiation (IR), topoisomerase poisons, antimetabolites, UV radiation and DNA intercalators. The MMR-dependent DNA damage signalling pathways activated by the above agents are also ill-defined. To date, signalling cascades involving the Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR), as well as the stress-activated kinases JNK/SAPK and p38alpha have been linked with methylating agent and 6-thioguanine (TG) treatments, while cisplatin damage was reported to activate the c-Abl and JNK/SAPK kinases in MMR-dependent manner. MMR defects are found in several different cancer types, both familiar and sporadic, and it is possible that the involvement of the MMR system in DNA damage signalling play an important role in transformation. The scope of this article is to provide a brief overview of the recent literature on this subject and to raise questions that could be addressed in future studies.     

DNA damage checkpoint and repair centers

In eukaryotes, recombinational repair is choreographed by multiprotein complexes that are organized into focal assemblies. These foci are highly dynamic giga-dalton structures capable of simultaneously repairing multiple DNA lesions. Moreover, the composition of these repair centers depends on the nature of the DNA lesion and is tightly coordinated with progression of the cell cycle. Components of DNA repair centers are regulated by post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination and sumoylation. Repair foci progress through four distinct stages: first, DNA damage recognition and binding of DNA ends by the Mre11 complex and Ku70/80; second, end-processing and binding of single-stranded DNA by replication protein A, which recruits checkpoint proteins; third, recombinational repair during S and G(2) phase; and fourth, disassembly of foci and resumption of the cell cycle.     

Radiation-induced DNA damage and its repair

Application of modern methods of organic chemistry and recombinant DNA technologies has provided new insights in the field of DNA radiation damage and its repair. An overview of the chemical nature of the lesions inflicted on DNA by ionizing radiation is presented. The structures of 29 different DNA modified base or sugar residues are shown in comprehensive formation schemes. A fraction of radiation-induced modified bases is spontaneously released from the DNA chain during irradiation. Another part remains attached to the DNA chain backbone and for its characterization mild formic acid or enzymatic hydrolysis have been used. Starting from the chemical formulae of the altered base residues, the specific repair enzymes and their modes of action are discussed. Various glycosylases and endonucleases have been purified to homogeneity, and in some cases the gene which encodes the protein cloned. Using methods derived from Maxam and Gilbert sequencing procedures and DNA fragment 32P-labelled at one end, it has been shown that the alkali-labile sites in DNA induced by radiation are strongly dependent on the DNA base sequence. Enzymatic methods have been used to analyse the DNA base defects produced by gamma-irradiation of cells under in vivo conditions. Structures of modified bases were the same as those observed when DNA was irradiated in aqueous solution.     

Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage by DNA glycosylases

Oxidative damage to DNA caused by free radicals and other oxidants generate base and sugar damage, strand breaks, clustered sites, tandem lesions and DNA-protein cross-links. Oxidative DNA damage is mainly repaired by base-excision repair in living cells with the involvement of DNA glycosylases in the first step and other enzymes in subsequent steps. DNA glycosylases remove modified bases from DNA, generating an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. Some of these enzymes that remove oxidatively modified DNA bases also possess AP-lyase activity to cleave DNA at AP sites. DNA glycosylases possess varying substrate specificities, and some of them exhibit cross-activity for removal of both pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. Most studies on substrate specificities and excision kinetics of DNA glycosylases were performed using oligonucleotides with a single modified base incorporated at a specific position. Other studies used high-molecular weight DNA containing multiple pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. In this case, substrate specificities and excision kinetics were found to be different from those observed with oligonucleotides. This paper reviews substrate specificities and excision kinetics of DNA glycosylases for removal of pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions in high-molecular weight DNA.     

MCM proteins: DNA damage, mutagenesis and repair

The MCM2-7 complex, which may act as a replicative helicase during DNA synthesis, plays a central role in S-phase genome stability. MCM proteins are required for processive DNA replication and are a target of S-phase checkpoints. Loss of MCM function causes DNA damage and genome instability. MCM expression is upregulated in proliferating cells, providing a diagnostic marker for both cancerous cells and cells with the potential to become malignant. The role of the MCM complex in genome integrity reflects its activity both at active replication forks and away from forks.     

DNA repair: models for damage and mismatch recognition

Maintaining the integrity of the genome is critical for the survival of any organism. To achieve this, many families of enzymatic repair systems which recognize and repair DNA damage have evolved. Perhaps most intriguing about the workings of these repair systems is the actual damage recognition process. What are the chemical characteristics which are common to sites of nucleic acid damage that DNA repair proteins may exploit in targeting sites? Importantly, thermodynamic and kinetic principles, as much as structural factors, make damage sites distinct from the native DNA bases, and indeed, in many cases, these are the features which are believed to be exploited by repair enzymes. Current proposals for damage recognition may not fulfill all of the demands required of enzymatic repair systems given the sheer size of many genomes, and the efficiency with which the genome is screened for damage. Here we discuss current models for how DNA damage recognition may occur and the chemical characteristics, shared by damaged DNA sites, of which repair proteins may take advantage. These include recognition based upon the thermodynamic and kinetic instabilities associated with aberrant sites. Additionally, we describe how small changes in base pair structure can alter also the unique electronic properties of the DNA base pair pi-stack. Further, we describe photophysical, electrochemical, and biochemical experiments in which mismatches and other local perturbations in structure are detected using DNA-mediated charge transport. Finally, we speculate as to how this DNA electron transfer chemistry might be exploited by repair enzymes in order to scan the genome for sites of damage.