Mutational analysis of conserved positions potentially important for initiator tRNA function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The conserved positions of the eukaryotic cytoplasmic initiator tRNA have been suggested to be important for the initiation of protein synthesis. However, the role of these positions is not known. We describe in this report a functional analysis of the yeast initiator methionine tRNA (tRNA(iMet)), using a novel in vivo assay system which is not dependent on suppressor tRNAs. Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with null alleles of the four initiator methionine tRNA (IMT) genes were constructed. Consequently, growth of these strains was dependent on tRNA(iMet) encoded from a plasmid-derived gene. We used these strains to investigate the significance of the conserved nucleosides of yeast tRNA(iMet) in vivo. Nucleotide substitutions corresponding to the nucleosides of the yeast elongator methionine tRNA (tRNA(MMet)) have been made at all conserved positions to identify the positions that are important for tRNA(iMet) to function in the initiation process. Surprisingly, nucleoside changes in base pairs 3-70, 12-23, 31-39, and 29-41, as well as expanding loop I by inserting an A at position 17 (A17) had no effect on the tester strain. Nucleotide substitutions in positions 54 and 60 to cytidines and guanosines (C54, G54, C60, and G60) did not prevent cell growth. In contrast, the double mutation U/rT54C60 blocked cell growth, and changing the A-U base pair 1-72 to a G-C base pair was deleterious to the cell, although these tRNAs were synthesized and accepted methionine in vitro. From our data, we suggest that an A-U base pair in position 1-72 is important for tRNA(iMet) function, that the hypothetical requirement for adenosines at positions 54 and 60 is invalid, and that a U/rT at position 54 is an antideterminant distinguishing an elongator from an initiator tRNA in the initiation of translation.     

Initiator-Elongator Discrimination in Vertebrate tRNAs for Protein Synthesis

Initiator tRNAs are used exclusively for initiation of protein synthesis and not for the elongation step. We show, in vivo and in vitro, that the primary sequence feature that prevents the human initiator tRNA from acting in the elongation step is the nature of base pairs 50:64 and 51:63 in the TΨC stem of the initiator tRNA. Various considerations suggest that this is due to sequence-dependent perturbation of the sugar phosphate backbone in the TΨC stem of initiator tRNA, which most likely blocks binding of the elongation factor to the tRNA. Because the sequences of all vertebrate initiator tRNAs are identical, our findings with the human initiator tRNA are likely to be valid for all vertebrate systems. We have developed reporter systems that can be used to monitor, in mammalian cells, the activity in elongation of mutant human initiator tRNAs carrying anticodon sequence mutations from CAU to CCU (the C35 mutant) or to CUA (the U35A36 mutant). Combination of the anticodon sequence mutation with mutations in base pairs 50:64 and 51:63 yielded tRNAs that act as elongators in mammalian cells. Further mutation of the A1:U72 base pair, which is conserved in virtually all eukaryotic initiator tRNAs, to G1:C72 in the C35 mutant background yielded tRNAs that were even more active in elongation. In addition, in a rabbit reticulocyte in vitro protein-synthesizing system, a tRNA carrying the TΨC stem and the A1:U72-to-G1:C72 mutations was almost as active in elongation as the elongator methionine tRNA. The combination of mutant initiator tRNA with the CCU anticodon and the reporter system developed here provides the first example of missense suppression in mammalian cells.     

The A1 x U72 base pair conserved in eukaryotic initiator tRNAs is important specifically for binding to the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF2.

The formation of a specific ternary complex between eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), the initiator methionyl-tRNA (Met-tRNA), and GTP is a critical step in translation initiation in the cytoplasmic protein-synthesizing system of eukaryotes. We show that the A1 x U72 base pair conserved at the end of the acceptor stem in eukaryotic and archaebacterial initiator methionine tRNAs plays an important role in this interaction. We changed the A1 x U72 base pair of the human initiator tRNA to G1 x C72 and expressed the wild-type and mutant tRNA genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by using constructs previously developed in our laboratory for expression of the human initiator tRNA gene in yeasts. We show that both the wild-type and mutant human initiator tRNAs are aminoacylated well in vivo. We have isolated the wild-type and mutant human initiator tRNAs in substantially pure form, free of the yeast initiator tRNA, and have analyzed their properties in vitro. The G1 x C72 mutation affects specifically the binding affinity of eIF2 for the initiator tRNA. It has no effect on the subsequent formation of 40S or 80S ribosome initiator Met-tRNA-AUG initiation complexes in vitro or on the puromycin reactivity of the Met-tRNA in the 80S initiation complex.     

Suppression of amber codons in vivo as evidence that mutants derived from Escherichia coli initiator tRNA can act at the step of elongation in protein synthesis

The absence of a Watson-Crick base pair at the end of the amino acid acceptor stem is one of the features which distinguishes prokaryotic initiator tRNAs as a class from all other tRNAs. We show that this structural feature prevents Escherichia coli initiator tRNA from acting as an elongator in protein synthesis in vivo. We generated a mutant of E. coli initiator tRNA in which the anticodon sequence is changed from CAU to CUA (the T35A36 mutant). This mutant tRNA has the potential to read the amber termination codon UAG. We then coupled this mutation to others which change the C1.A72 mismatch at the end of the acceptor stem to either a U1:A72 base pair (T1 mutant) or a C1:G72 base pair (G72 mutant). Transformation of E. coli CA274 (HfrC Su- lacZ125am trpEam) with multicopy plasmids carrying the mutant initiator tRNA genes show that mutant tRNAs carrying changes in both the anticodon sequence and the acceptor stem suppress amber codons in vivo, whereas mutant tRNA with changes in the anticodon sequence alone does not. Mutant tRNAs with the above anticodon sequence change are aminoacylated with glutamine in vitro. Measurement of kinetic parameters for aminoacylation by E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase show that both the nature of the base pair at the end of the acceptor stem and the presence or absence of a base pair at this position can affect aminoacylation kinetics. We discuss the implications of this result on recognition of tRNAs by E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase.     

Common location of determinants in initiator transfer RNAs for initiator-elongator discrimination in bacteria and in eukaryotes

Initiator tRNAs are used exclusively for initiation of protein synthesis and not for elongation. We show that both Escherichia coli and eukaryotic initiator tRNAs have negative determinants, at the same positions, that block their activity in elongation. The primary negative determinant in E. coli initiator tRNA is the C1xA72 mismatch at the end of the acceptor stem. The primary negative determinant in eukaryotic initiator tRNAs is located in the TPsiC stem, whereas a secondary negative determinant is the A1:U72 base pair at the end of the acceptor stem. Here we show that E. coli initiator tRNA also has a secondary negative determinant for elongation and that it is the U50.G64 wobble base pair, located at the same position in the TPsiC stem as the primary negative determinant in eukaryotic initiator tRNAs. Mutation of the U50.G64 wobble base pair to C50:G64 or U50:A64 base pairs increases the in vivo amber suppressor activity of initiator tRNA mutants that have changes in the acceptor stem and in the anticodon sequence necessary for amber suppressor activity. Binding assays of the mutant aminoacyl-tRNAs carrying the C50 and A64 changes to the elongation factor EF-Tu.GTP show marginally higher affinity of the C50 and A64 mutant tRNAs and increased stability of the EF-Tu.GTP. aminoacyl-tRNA ternary complexes. Other results show a large effect of the amino acid attached to a tRNA, glutamine versus methionine, on the binding affinity toward EF-Tu.GTP and on the stability of the EF-Tu.GTP.aminoacyl-tRNA ternary complex.     

Role of the 1-72 base pair in tRNAs for the activity of Escherichia coli peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase.

Previous work by Schulman and Pelka (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 250, 542-547, indicated that the absence of a pairing between the bases 1 and 72 in initiator tRNA(fMet) explained the relatively small activity of peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase towards N-acetyl-methionyl-tRNA(fMet). In the present study, the structural requirements for the sensitivity of an N-acetyl-aminoacyl-tRNA to Escherichia coli peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase activity have been further investigated. Ten derivatives of tRNA(fMet) with various combinations of bases at positions 1 and 72 in the acceptor stem have been produced, aminoacylated and chemically acetylated. The release of the aminoacyl moiety from these tRNA derivatives was assayed in the presence of peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase purified from an overproducing strain. tRNA(fMet) derivatives with either C1A72, C1C72, U1G72, U1C72 or A1C72 behaved as poor substrates of the enzyme, as compared to those with C1G72, U1A72, G1C72, A1U72 or G1U72. With the exception of U1G72, it could be therefore concluded that the relative resistance of tRNA(fMet) to peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase did not depend on a particular combination of nucleotides at positions 1 and 72, but rather reflected the absence of a base pairing at these positions. In a second series of experiments, the unpairing of the 1 and 72 bases, created with C-A or A-C bases, instead of G-C in methionyl-tRNA(mMet) or in valyl-tRNA(Val1), was shown to markedly decrease the rate of hydrolysis catalysed by peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase. Altogether, the data indicate that the stability of the 1-72 pair governs the degree of sensitivity of a peptidyl-tRNA to peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase.     

Footprinting mRNA-ribosome complexes with chemical probes.

We footprinted the interaction of model mRNAs with 30S ribosomal subunits in the presence or absence of tRNA(fMet) or tRNA(Phe) using chemical probes directed at the sugar-phosphate backbone or bases of the mRNAs. When bound to the 30S subunits in the presence of tRNA(fMet), the sugar-phosphate backbones of gene 32 mRNA and 022 mRNA are protected from hydroxyl radical attack within a region of about 54 nucleotides bounded by positions -35 (+/- 2) and +19, extending to position +22 when tRNA(Phe) is used. In 70S ribosomes, protection is extended in the 5' direction to about position -39 (+/- 2). In the absence of tRNA, the 30S subunit protects only nucleotides -35 (+/- 2) to +5. Introduction of a stable tetraloop hairpin between positions +10 and +11 of gene 32 mRNA does not interfere with tRNA(fMet)-dependent binding of the mRNA to 30S subunits, but results in loss of protection of the sugar-phosphate backbone of the mRNA downstream of position +5. Using base-specific probes, we find that the Shine-Dalgarno sequence (A-12, A-11, G-10 and G-9) and the initiation codon (A+1, U+2 and G+3) of gene 32 mRNA are strongly protected by 30S subunits in the presence of initiator tRNA. In the presence of tRNA(Phe), the same Shine-Dalgarno bases are protected, as are U+4, U+5 and U+6 of the phenylalanine codon. Interestingly, A-1, immediately preceding the initiation codon, is protected in the complex with 30S subunits and initiator tRNA, while U+2 and G+3 are protected in the complex with tRNA(Phe) in the absence of initiator tRNA. Additionally, specific bases upstream from the Shine-Dalgarno region (U-33, G-32 and U-22) as well as 3' to the initiation codon (G+11) are protected by 30S subunits in the presence of either tRNA. These results imply that the mRNA binding site of the 30S subunit covers about 54-57 nucleotides and are consistent with the possibility that the ribosome interacts with mRNA along its sugar-phosphate backbone.     

Yeast initiator tRNA identity elements cooperate to influence multiple steps of translation initiation

All three kingdoms of life employ two methionine tRNAs, one for translation initiation and the other for insertion of methionines at internal positions within growing polypeptide chains. We have used a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system to explore the interactions of the initiator tRNA with the translation initiation machinery. Our data indicate that in addition to its previously characterized role in binding of the initiator tRNA to eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), the initiator-specific A1:U72 base pair at the top of the acceptor stem is important for the binding of the eIF2.GTP.Met-tRNA(i) ternary complex to the 40S ribosomal subunit. We have also shown that the initiator-specific G:C base pairs in the anticodon stem of the initiator tRNA are required for the strong thermodynamic coupling between binding of the ternary complex and mRNA to the ribosome. This coupling reflects interactions that occur within the complex upon recognition of the start codon, suggesting that these initiator-specific G:C pairs influence this step. The effect of these anticodon stem identity elements is influenced by bases in the T loop of the tRNA, suggesting that conformational coupling between the D-loop-T-loop substructure and the anticodon stem of the initiator tRNA may occur during AUG codon selection in the ribosomal P-site, similar to the conformational coupling that occurs in A-site tRNAs engaged in mRNA decoding during the elongation phase of protein synthesis.     

The anticodon and discriminator base are major determinants of cysteine tRNA identity in vivo.

Mutants of the Escherichia coli initiator tRNA (tRNA(fMet)) have been used to examine the role of the anticodon and discriminator base in in vivo aminoacylation of tRNAs by cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase. Substitution of the methionine anticodon CAU with the cysteine anticodon GCA was found to allow initiation of protein synthesis by the mutant tRNA from a complementary initiation codon in a reporter protein. Sequencing of the protein revealed that cysteine comprised about half of the amino acid at the N terminus. An additional mutation, converting the discriminator base of tRNA(GCAfMet) from A73 to the base present in tRNA(Cys) (U73), resulted in a 6-fold increase in the amount of protein produced and insertion of greater than or equal to 90% cysteine in response to the complementary initiation codon. Substitution of C73 or G73 at the discriminator position led to insertion of little or no cysteine, indicating the importance of U73 for recognition of the tRNA by cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase. Single base changes in the anticodon of tRNA(GCAfMet) containing U73 from GCA to UCA, GUA, GCC, and GCG (changes underlined) eliminated or dramatically reduced cysteine insertion by the mutant initiator tRNA indicating that all three cysteine anticodon bases are essential for specific aminoacylation of the tRNA with cysteine in vivo.     

Structural specificity of Rn nuclease I as probed on yeast tRNA(Phe) and tRNA(Asp).

A single-strand-specific nuclease from rye germ (Rn nuclease I) was characterized as a tool for secondary and tertiary structure investigation of RNAs. To test the procedure, yeast tRNA(Phe) and tRNA(Asp) for which the tertiary structures are known, as well as the 3'-half of tRNA(Asp) were used as substrates. In tRNA(Phe) the nuclease introduced main primary cuts at positions U33 and A35 of the anticodon loop and G18 and G19 of the D loop. No primary cuts were observed within the double stranded stems. In tRNA(Asp) the main cuts occurred at positions U33, G34, U35, C36 of the anticodon loop and G18 and C20:1 positions in the D loop. No cuts were observed in the T loop in intact tRNA(Asp) but strong primary cleavages occurred at positions psi 55, C56, A57 within that loop in the absence of the tertiary interactions between T and D loops (use of 3'-half tRNA(Asp)). These results show that Rn nuclease I is specific for exposed single-stranded regions.     

Recognition of tRNAs by Methionyl-tRNA transformylase from mammalian mitochondria

Protein synthesis involves two methionine-isoaccepting tRNAs, an initiator and an elongator. In eubacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts, the addition of a formyl group gives its full functional identity to initiator Met-tRNA(Met). In Escherichia coli, it has been shown that the specific action of methionyl-tRNA transformylase on Met-tRNA(f)(Met) mainly involves a set of nucleotides in the acceptor stem, particularly a C(1)A(72) mismatch. In animal mitochondria, only one tRNA(Met) species has yet been described. It is admitted that this species can engage itself either in initiation or elongation of translation, depending on the presence or absence of a formyl group. In the present study, we searched for the identity elements of tRNA(Met) that govern its formylation by bovine mitochondrial transformylase. The main conclusion is that the mitochondrial formylase preferentially recognizes the methionyl moiety of its tRNA substrate. Moreover, the relatively small importance of the tRNA acceptor stem in the recognition process accounts for the protection against formylation of the mitochondrial tRNAs that share with tRNA(Met) an A(1)U(72) motif.     

Nucleotides of tRNA governing the specificity of Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA(fMet) formyltransferase.

In Escherichia coli, the free amino group of the aminoacyl moiety of methionyl-tRNA(fMet) is specifically modified by a transformylation reaction. To identify the nucleotides governing the recognition of the tRNA substrate by the formylase, initiator tRNA(fMet) was changed into an elongator tRNA with the help of an in vivo selection method. All the mutations isolated were in the tRNA acceptor arm, at positions 72 and 73. The major role of the acceptor arm was further established by the demonstration of the full formylability of a chimaeric tRNA(Met) containing the acceptor stem of tRNA(fMet) and the remaining of the structure of tRNA(mMet). In addition, more than 30 variants of the genes encoding tRNA(mMet) or tRNA(fMet) have been constructed, the corresponding mutant tRNA products purified and the parameters of the formylation reaction measured. tRNA(mMet) became formylatable by the only change of the G1.C72 base-pair into C1-A72. It was possible to render tRNA(mMet) as good a substrate as tRNA(fMet) for the formylase by the introduction of a limited number of additional changes in the acceptor stem. In conclusion, A73, G2.C71, C3.G70 and G4.C69 are positive determinants for the specific processing of methionyl-tRNA(fMet) by the formylase while the occurrence of a G.C or C.G base-pair between positions 1 and 72 acts as a major negative determinant. This pattern appears to account fully for the specificity of the formylase and the lack of formylation of any aminoacylated tRNA, excepting the methionyl-tRNA(fMet).     

GTP-dependent recognition of the methionine moiety on initiator tRNA by translation factor eIF2

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) is a G-protein that functions as a central switch in the initiation of protein synthesis. In its GTP-bound state it delivers the methionyl initiator tRNA (Met-tRNA(i)) to the small ribosomal subunit and releases it upon GTP hydrolysis following the recognition of the initiation codon. We have developed a complete thermodynamic framework for the assembly of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF2.GTP.Met-tRNA(i) ternary complex and have determined the effect of the conversion of GTP to GDP on eIF2's affinity for Met-tRNA(i) in solution. In its GTP-bound state the factor forms a positive interaction with the methionine moiety on Met-tRNA(i) that is disrupted when GTP is replaced with GDP, while contacts between the factor and the body of the tRNA remain intact. This positive interaction with the methionine residue on the tRNA may serve to ensure that only charged initiator tRNA enters the initiation pathway. The toggling on and off of the factor's interaction with the methionine residue is likely to play an important role in the mechanism of initiator tRNA release upon initiation codon recognition. In addition, we show that the conserved base-pair A1:U72, which is known to be a critical identity element distinguishing initiator from elongator methionyl tRNA, is required for recognition of the methionine moiety by eIF2. Our data suggest that a role of this base-pair is to orient the methionine moiety on the initiator tRNA in its recognition pocket on eIF2.     

tRNA recognition by tRNA-guanine transglycosylase from Escherichia coli: the role of U33 in U-G-U sequence recognition.

In eubacteria, the biosynthesis of queuine, a modified base found in the wobble position (#34) of tRNAs coding for Tyr, His, Asp, and Asn, occurs via a multistep pathway. One of the key enzymes in this pathway, tRNA-guanine transglycosylase (TGT), exchanges the genetically encoded guanine at position 34 with a queuine precursor, preQ1. Previous studies have identified a minimal positive RNA recognition motif for Escherichia coli TGT consisting of a stable minihelix that contains a U-G-U sequence starting at the second position of its seven base anticodon loop. Recently, we reported that TGT was capable of recognizing the U-G-U sequence outside of this limited structural context. To further characterize the ability of TGT to recognize the U-G-U sequence in alternate contexts, we constructed mutants of the previously characterized E. coli tRNA(Tyr) minihelix. The U-G-U sequence was shifted to various positions within the anticodon loop of these mutants. Characterization of these analogs demonstrates that in addition to the normal U33G34U35 position, TGT can also recognize the U34G35U36 analog (UGU(+1)). The other analogs were not active. This indicates that the recognition of the U-G-U sequence is not strictly dependent upon its position relative to the stem. In E. coli, the full-length tRNA with a U34G35U36 anticodon sequence is one of the isoacceptors that codes for threonine. We found that TGT is able to recognize tRNA(Thr(UGU)) but only in the absence of a uridine at position 33. U33, an invariant base present in all tRNAs, has been shown to strongly influence the conformation of the anticodon loop of certain tRNAs. We find that mutation of this base confers on TGT the ability to recognize U34G35U36, and suggests that loop conformation affects recognition. The fact that the other analogs were not active indicates that although TGT is capable of recognizing the U-G-U sequence in additional contexts, this recognition is not indiscriminate.     

Conversion of a methionine initiator tRNA into a tryptophan-inserting elongator tRNA in vivo.

The role of the anticodon and discriminator base in aminoacylation of tRNAs with tryptophan has been explored using a recently developed in vivo assay based on initiation of protein synthesis by mischarged mutants of the Escherichia coli initiator tRNA. Substitution of the methionine anticodon CAU with the tryptophan anticodon CCA caused tRNA(fMet) to be aminoacylated with both methionine and tryptophan in vivo, as determined by analysis of the amino acids inserted by the mutant tRNA at the translational start site of a reporter protein containing a tryptophan initiation codon. Conversion of the discriminator base of tRNA(CCA)fMet from A73 to G73, the base present in tRNA(Trp), eliminated the in vivo methionine acceptor activity of the tRNA and resulted in complete charging with tryptophan. Single base changes in the anticodon of tRNA(CCA)fMet containing G73 from CCA to UCA, GCA, CAA, and CCG (changes underlined) essentially abolished tryptophan insertion, showing that all three anticodon bases specify the tryptophan identity of the tRNA. The important role of G73 in tryptophan identity was confirmed using mutants of an opal suppressor derivative of tRNA(Trp). Substitution of G73 with A73, C73, or U73 resulted in a large loss of the ability of the tRNA to suppress an opal stop codon in a reporter protein. Base pair substitutions at the first three positions of the acceptor stem of the suppressor tRNA caused 2-12-fold reductions in the efficiency of suppression without loss of specificity for aminoacylation of the tRNA with tryptophan.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Role of the three consecutive G:C base pairs conserved in the anticodon stem of initiator tRNAs in initiation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli.

The three consecutive G:C base pairs, G29:C41, G30:C40, and G31:C39, are conserved in the anticodon stem of virtually all initiator tRNAs from eubacteria, eukaryotes, and archaebacteria. We show that these G:C base pairs are important for function of the tRNA in initiation of protein synthesis in vivo. We changed these base pairs individually and in combinations and analyzed the activities of the mutant Escherichia coli initiator tRNAs in initiation in vivo. For assessment of activity of the mutant tRNAs in vivo, mutations in the G:C base pairs were coupled to mutation in the anticodon sequence from CAU to CUA. Mutations in each of the G:C base pairs reduced activity of the mutant tRNA in initiation, with mutation in the second G:C base pair having the most severe effect. The greatly reduced activity of this C30:G40 mutant tRNA is not due to defects in aminoacylation or formulation of the tRNA or defects in base modification of the A37, next to the anticodon, which we had previously shown to be important for activity of the mutant tRNAs in initiation. The anticodon stem mutants are most likely affected specifically at the step of binding to the ribosomal P site. The pattern of cleavages in the anticodon loop of mutant tRNAs by S1 nuclease indicate that the G:C base pairs may be involved directly in interactions of the tRNA with components of the P site on the ribosome rather than indirectly by inducing a particular conformation of the anticodon loop critical for function of the tRNA in initiation.