Detection of linkage between marker loci and loci affecting quantitative traits in crosses between segregating populations

Summary By making use of pedigree information and information on marker-genotypes of the parent and F-1 individuals crossed to form an F-2 population, it is possible to carry out a linkage analysis between marker loci and loci affecting quantitative traits in a cross between segregating parent populations that are at fixation for alternative alleles at the QTL, but share the same alleles at the marker loci. For two-allele systems, depending on marker allele frequencies in the parent populations, 2–4 times as many F-2 offspring will have to be raised and scored for markers and quantitative traits in order to provide power equivalent to that obtained in a cross between fully inbred lines. Major savings in number of F-2 offspring raised can be achieved by scoring each parent pair for a large number of markers in each chromosomal region and scoring F-1 and F-2 offspring only for those markers for which the parents were homozygous for alternative alleles. For multiple allele systems, particularly when dealing with hypervariable loci, only 10%–20% additional F-2 offspring will have to be raised and scored to provide power equivalent to that obtained in a cross between inbred lines. When a resource population contains novel favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci that are not present (or rare) in a commercial population, analyses of this sort will enable the loci of interest to be identified, mapped and manipulated effectively in breeding programs.Contribution no. 2124-E, 1987 series from The Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel     

Marker-based mapping of quantitative trait loci using replicated progenies

Summary When heritability of the trait under investigation is low, replicated progenies can bring about a major reduction in the number of individuals that need to be scored for marker genotype in determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci (QTL). Savings are greatest when heritability of the trait is low, but are much reduced when heritability of the quantitative trait is moderate to high. Required numbers for recombinant inbred lines will be greater than those required for a simple F₂ population when heritabilities are moderate to high and the proportion of recombination between marker locus and quantitative trait locus is substantial.Contribution No. 2613-E of the Agricultural Research Organization, 1989 series     

Selective genotyping for determination of linkage between a marker locus and a quantitative trait locus

Summary Selective genotyping is the term used when the determination of linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting some particular trait is carried out by genotyping only individuals from the high and low phenotypic tails of the entire sample population. Selective genotyping can markedly decrease the number of individuals genotyped for a given power at the expense of an increase in the number of individuals phenotyped. The optimum proportion of individuals genotyped from the point of view of minimizing costs for a given experimental power depends strongly on the cost of completely genotyping an individual for all of the markers included in the experiment (including the costs of obtaining a DNA sample) relative to the cost of rearing and trait evaluation of an individual. However, in single trait studies, it will almost never be useful to genotype more than the upper and lower 25% of a population. It is shown that the observed difference in quantitative trait values associated with alternative marker genotypes in the selected population can be much greater than the actual gene effect at the quantitative trait locus when the entire population is considered. An expression and a figure is provided for converting observed differences under selective genotyping to actual gene effects.     

Detection of linkage between quantitative trait loci and restriction fragment length polymorphisms using inbred lines

Summary In segregating populations, large numbers of individuals are needed to detect linkage between markers, such as restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), and quantitative trait loci (QTL), limiting the potential use of such markers for detecting linkage. Fewer individuals from inbred lines are needed to detect linkage. Simulation data were used to test the utility of two methods to detect linkage: maximum likelihood and comparison of marker genotype means. When there is tight linkage, the two methods have similar power, but when there is loose linkage, maximum likelihood is much more powerful. Once inbred lines have been established, they can be screened rapidly to detect QTL for several traits simultaneously. If there is sufficient coverage of the genome with RFLPs, several QTL for each trait may be detected.     

Trait-based analyses for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in crosses between inbred lines

Summary Methods are presented for determining linkage between a marker locus and a nearby locus affecting a quantitative trait (quantitative trait locus=QTL), based on changes in the marker allele frequencies in selection lines derived from the F-2 of a cross between inbred lines, or in the high and low phenotypic classes of an F-2 or BC population. The power of such trait-based (TB) analyses was evaluated and compared with that of methods for determining linkage based on the mean quantitative trait value of marker genotypes in F-2 or BC populations [marker-based (MB) analyses]. TB analyses can be utilized for marker-QTL linkage determination in situations where the MB analysis is not applicable, including analysis of polygenic resistance traits where only a part of the population survives exposure to the Stressor and analysis of marker-allele frequency changes in selection lines. TB analyses may be a useful alternative to MB analyses when interest is centered on a single quantitative trait only and costs of scoring for markers are high compared with costs of raising and obtaining quantitative trait information on F-2 or BC individuals. In this case, a TB analysis will enable equivalent power to be obtained with fewer individuals scored for the marker, but more individuals scored for the quantitative trait. MB analyses remain the method of choice when more than one quantitative trait is to be analyzed in a given population.Contribution from the ARO, Bet Dagan, Israel. No. 1698-E, 1986 series     

Power of different sampling strategies to detect quantitative trait loci variance effects

Summary Many studies have shown that segregating quantitative trait loci (QTL) can be detected via linkage to genetic markers. Power to detect a QTL effect on the trait mean as a function of the number of individuals genotyped for the marker is increased by selectively genotyping individuals with extreme values for the quantitative trait. Computer simulations were employed to study the effect of various sampling strategies on the statistical power to detect QTL variance effects. If only individuals with extreme phenotypes for the quantitative trait are selected for genotyping, then power to detect a variance effect is less than by random sampling. If 0.2 of the total number of individuals genotyped are selected from the center of the distribution, then power to detect a variance effect is equal to that obtained with random selection. Power to detect a variance effect was maximum when 0.2 to 0.5 of the individuals selected for genotyping were selected from the tails of the distribution and the remainder from the center.     

Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep

This paper presents results from a mapping experiment to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance to Haemonchus contortus infestation in merino sheep. The primary trait analysed was faecal worm egg count in response to artificial challenge at 6 months of age. In the first stage of the experiment, whole genome linkage analysis was used for broad-scale mapping. The animal resource used was a designed flock comprising 571 individuals from four half-sib families. The average marker spacing was about 20 cM. For the primary trait, 11 QTL (as chromosomal/family combinations) were significant at the 5% chromosome-wide level, with allelic substitution effects of between 0.19 and 0.38 phenotypic standard deviation units. In general, these QTL did not have a significant effect on faecal worm egg count recorded at 13 months of age. In the second stage of the experiment, three promising regions (located on chromosomes 1, 3 and 4) were fine-mapped. This involved typing more closely spaced markers on individuals from the designed flock as well as an additional 495 individuals selected from a related population with a deeper pedigree. Analysis was performed using a linkage disequilibrium–linkage approach, under additive, dominant and multiple QTL models. Of these, the multiple QTL model resulted in the most refined QTL positions, with resolutions of <10 cM achieved for two regions. Because of the moderate size of effect of the QTL, and the apparent age and/or immune status specificity of the QTL, it is suggested that a panel of QTL will be required for significant genetic gains to be achieved within industry via marker-assisted selection.     

A method for computing identity by descent probabilities and quantitative trait loci mapping with dominant (AFLP) markers

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) are a widely used marker system: the technique is very cost-effective, easy and rapid, and reproducibly generates hundreds of markers. Unfortunately, AFLP alleles are typically scored as the presence or absence of a band and, thus, heterozygous and dominant homozygous genotypes cannot be distinguished. This results in a significant loss of information, especially as regards mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs). We present a Monte Carlo Markov Chain method that allows us to compute the identity by descent probabilities (IBD) in a general pedigree whose individuals have been typed for dominant markers. The method allows us to include the information provided by the fluorescent band intensities of the markers, the rationale being that homozygous individuals have on average higher band intensities than heterozygous individuals, as well as information from linked markers in each individual and its relatives. Once IBD probabilities are obtained, they can be combined into the QTL mapping strategy of choice. We illustrate the method with two simulated populations: an outbred population consisting of full sib families, and an F2 cross between inbred lines. Two marker spacings were considered, 5 or 20 cM, in the outbred population. There was almost no difference, for the practical purpose of QTL estimation, between AFLPs and biallelic codominant markers when the band density is taken into account, especially at the 5 cM spacing. The performance of AFLPs every 5 cM was also comparable to that of highly polymorphic markers (microsatellites) spaced every 20 cM. In economic terms, QTL mapping with a dense map of AFLPs is clearly better than microsatellite QTL mapping and little is lost in terms of accuracy of position. Nevertheless, at low marker densities, AFLPs or other biallelic markers result in very inaccurate estimates of QTL position.     

Comparing linkage disequilibrium-based methods for fine mapping quantitative trait loci

Recently, a method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) using linkage disequilibrium was proposed to map QTL by modeling covariance between individuals, due to identical-by-descent (IBD) QTL alleles, on the basis of the similarity of their marker haplotypes under an assumed population history. In the work presented here, the advantage of using marker haplotype information for fine mapping QTL was studied by comparing the IBD-based method with 10 markers to regression on a single marker, a pair of markers, or a two-locus haplotype under alternative population histories. When 10 markers were genotyped, the IBD-based method estimated the position of the QTL more accurately than did single-marker regression in all populations. When 20 markers were genotyped for regression, as single-marker methods do not require knowledge of haplotypes, the mapping accuracy of regression in all populations was similar to or greater than that of the IBD-based method using 10 markers. Thus for populations similar to those simulated here, the IBD-based method is comparable to single-marker regression analysis for fine mapping QTL.     

Bayesian analysis of linkage between genetic markers and quantitative trait loci. II. Combining prior knowledge with experimental evidence

Summary A Bayesian method was developed for identifying genetic markers linked to quantitative trait loci (QTL) by analyzing data from daughter or granddaughter designs and single markers or marker pairs. Traditional methods may yield unrealistic results because linkage tests depend on number of markers and QTL gene effects associated with selected markers are overestimated. The Bayesian or posterior probability of linkage combines information from a daughter or granddaughter design with the prior probability of linkage between a marker locus and a QTL. If the posterior probability exceeds a certain quantity, linkage is declared. Upon linkage acceptance, Bayesian estimates of marker-QTL recombination rate and QTL gene effects and frequencies are obtained. The Bayesian estimates of QTL gene effects account for different amounts of information by shrinking information from data toward the mean or mode of a prior exponential distribution of gene effects. Computation of the Bayesian analysis is feasible. Exact results are given for biallelic QTL, and extensions to multiallelic QTL are suggested.     

Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibria with closely linked marker loci

A multimarker linkage disequilibrium mapping method was developed for the fine mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) using a dense marker map. The method compares the expected covariances between haplotype effects given a postulated QTL position to the covariances that are found in the data. The expected covariances between the haplotype effects are proportional to the probability that the QTL position is identical by descent (IBD) given the marker haplotype information, which is calculated using the genedropping method. Simulation results showed that a QTL was correctly positioned within a region of 3, 1.5, or 0.75 cM in 70, 62, and 68%, respectively, of the replicates using markers spaced at intervals of 1, 0.5, and 0.25 cM, respectively. These results were rather insensitive to the number of generations since the QTL occurred and to the effective population size, except that 10 generations yielded rather poor estimates of the QTL position. The position estimates of this multimarker disequilibrium mapping method were more accurate than those from a single marker transmission disequilibrium test. A general approach for identifying QTL is suggested, where several stages of disequilibrium mapping are used with increasingly dense marker spacing.     

Detecting Marker-Qtl Linkage and Estimating Qtl Gene Effect and Map Location Using a Saturated Genetic Map

A simulation study was carried out on a backcross population in order to determine the effect of marker spacing, gene effect and population size on the power of marker-quantitative trait loci (QTL) linkage experiments and on the standard error of maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) of QTL gene effect and map location. Power of detecting a QTL was virtually the same for a marker spacing of 10 cM as for an infinite number of markers and was only slightly decreased for marker spacing of 20 or even 50 cM. The advantage of using interval mapping as compared to single-marker analysis was slight. ``Resolving power' of a marker-QTL linkage experiment was defined as the 95% confidence interval for the QTL map location that would be obtained when scoring an infinite number of markers. It was found that reducing marker spacing below the resolving power did not add appreciably to narrowing the confidence interval. Thus, the 95% confidence interval with infinite markers sets the useful marker spacing for estimating QTL map location for a given population size and estimated gene effect.     

High resolution mapping and identification of new quantitative trait loci (QTL) affecting susceptibility to Marek's disease

Marek's disease (MD) is a lymphoproliferative disease of chickens that costs the poultry industry approximately $1 billion annually. Genetic resistance to MD is gaining increased attention to augment vaccinal control as disease outbreaks occur more frequently. Previously, analysis of a 272 F2 White Leghorn resource population measured for many MD traits and genotyped for 78 microsatellite markers revealed two and four quantitative trait loci (QTL) with significant and suggestive association, respectively, to one or more MD associated traits. Additional genetic markers have since been scored on the MD resource population to increase QTL resolution and genome coverage. Saturation of four of the QTL regions with 17 markers revealed five new QTL while 32 markers extended the genome coverage by 400 + CM and uncovered three more QTL. QTL analysis by single-point and interval mapping algorithms agreed well when marker saturation was approximately 20 CM or less. Currently 127 genetic markers cover approximately 68% of the genome that contain up to 14 MD QTL associated to one or more MD trait; seven at the significant level and seven at the suggestive level. Individually each QTL accounts for 2-10% of the variation and, in general, resistance was dominant although the resistant allele may come from either parental line. This study suggests that a limited number of genomic regions play a major role in the genetic control of MD resistance. Markers linked to these loci may be useful for selection of MD resistant stock by the poultry industry following verification of the association within their breeding populations.     

Mapping quantitative trait loci with dominant markers in four-way crosses

 A common problem in mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) is that marker data are often incomplete. This includes missing data, dominant markers, and partially informative markers, arising in outbred populations. Here we briefly present an iteratively re-weighted least square method (IRWLS) to incorporate dominant and missing markers for mapping QTLs in four-way crosses under a heterogeneous variance model. The algorithm uses information from all markers in a linkage group to infer the QTL genotype. Monte Carlo simulations indicate that with half dominant markers, QTL detection is almost as efficient as with all co-dominant markers. However, the precision of the estimated QTL parameters generally decreases as more markers become missing or dominant. Notable differences are observed on the standard deviation of the estimated QTL position for varying levels of marker information content. The method is relatively simple so that more complex models including multiple QTLs or fixed effects can be fitted. Finally, the method can be readily extended to QTL mapping in full-sib families. Received: 16 June 1998 / Accepted: 29 September 1998     

Detection of quantitative trait loci in outbred populations with incomplete marker data.

Augmentation of marker genotypes for ungenotyped individuals is implemented in a Bayesian approach via the use of Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Marker data on relatives and phenotypes are combined to compute conditional posterior probabilities for marker genotypes of ungenotyped individuals. The presented procedure allows the analysis of complex pedigrees with ungenotyped individuals to detect segregating quantitative trait loci (QTL). Allelic effects at the QTL were assumed to follow a normal distribution with a covariance matrix based on known QTL position and identity by descent probabilities derived from flanking markers. The Bayesian approach estimates variance due to the single QTL, together with polygenic and residual variance. The method was empirically tested through analyzing simulated data from a complex granddaughter design. Ungenotyped dams were related to one or more sons or grandsires in the design. Heterozygosity of the marker loci and size of QTL were varied. Simulation results indicated a significant increase in power when ungenotyped dams were included in the analysis.     

Construction of microsatellite-based linkage maps and identification of size-related quantitative trait loci for Zhikong scallop (Chlamys farreri)

We constructed the microsatellite-based linkage maps using 318 markers typed in two F₁ outbred families of Zhikong scallop ( Chlamys farreri ). The results showed an extremely high proportion (56.2%) of non-amplifying null alleles and a high ratio (30%) of segregation distortion. By aligning different individual-based linkage maps, 19 linkage groups were identified, which are consistent with the haploid chromosome number of Zhikong scallop. The integrated linkage map contains 154 markers covering 1561.8 cM with an average intermarker spacing of 12.3 cM and 77.0% of genome coverage. We found that the heterogeneity in recombination rate was not determined by sexes but by different individuals on 18 linkage regions. The phenotypic marker of general shell colour was placed on LG4, which was flanked by microsatellite markers CFLD064 and CFBD055 . Four size-related traits including shell length (SL), shell width (SW), shell height (SH) and gross weight (GW) were analysed to identify the putative quantitative trait loci (QTL). Under the half-sib model, using dam as common parent, three, two, two and one QTL affecting SL, SW, SH and GW exceeded the genome-wide thresholds respectively. While using sir as common parent, a larger number of QTL were detected for these four traits: four, five, three and two for SL, SW, SH and GW respectively. The single QTL explained 3.7–19.2% of the phenotypic variation. The linkage map and the QTL associated with economic traits will provide useful information for marker-assisted selection of Zhikong scallop.     

Mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for oil yield using SSRs and gene-based markers in African oil palm (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Elaeis guineensis</Emphasis> Jacq.)

The identification of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) based on anchor markers, especially candidate genes that control a trait of interest, has been noted to increase the power of QTL detection. Since these markers can be scored as co-dominant data, they are also valuable for comparing and integrating the QTL linkage maps from diverse mapping populations. To estimate the position and effects of QTLs linked to oil yield traits in African oil palm, co-dominant microsatellites (SSR) and candidate gene-based sequence polymorphisms were applied to construct a linkage map for a progeny showing large differences in oil yield components. The progeny was genotyped for 97 SSR markers, 93 gene-linked markers, and 12 non-gene-linked SNP markers. From these, 190 segregating loci could be arranged into 31 linkage groups while 12 markers remained unmapped. Using the single marker linkage, interval mapping and multiple QTL methods, 16 putative QTLs on seven linkage groups affecting important oil yield related traits such as fresh fruit bunch yield (FFB), ratio of oil per fruit (OF), oil per bunch (OB), fruit per bunch (FB) and wet mesocarp per fruit (WMF) could be identified in the segregating population with estimated values for explained variance ranging from 12.4 % to 54.5 %. Markers designed from some candidate genes involved in lipid biosynthesis were found to be mapped near significant QTLs for various economic yield traits. Associations between QTLs and potential candidate genes are discussed.     

On the detection of imprinted quantitative trait loci in line crosses: effect of linkage disequilibrium

Imprinted quantitative trait loci (QTL) are commonly reported in studies using line-cross designs, especially in livestock species. It was previously shown that such parent-of-origin effects might result from the nonfixation of QTL alleles in one or both parental lines, rather than from genuine molecular parental imprinting. We herein demonstrate that if linkage disequilibrium exists between marker loci and nonfixed QTL, spurious detection of pseudo-imprinting is increased by an additional 40–80% in scenarios mimicking typical livestock situations. This is due to the fact that imprinting can be tested only in F₂ offspring whose sire and dam have distinct marker genotypes. In the case of linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTL, such parents have a higher chance to have distinct QTL genotypes as well, thus resulting in distinct padumnal and madumnal allele substitution effects, i.e., QTL pseudo-imprinting.     

Mapping quantitative trait loci using molecular marker linkage maps

Summary High-density restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and allozyme linkage maps have been developed in several plant species. These maps make it technically feasible to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) using methods based on flanking marker genetic models. In this paper, we describe flanking marker models for doubled haploid (DH), recombinant inbred (RI), backcross (BC), F₁ testcross (F₁TC), DH testcross (DHTC), recombinant inbred testcross (RITC), F₂, and F₃ progeny. These models are functions of the means of quantitative trait locus genotypes and recombination frequencies between marker and quantitative trait loci. In addition to the genetic models, we describe maximum likelihood methods for estimating these parameters using linear, nonlinear, and univariate or multivariate normal distribution mixture models. We defined recombination frequency estimators for backcross and F₂ progeny group genetic models using the parameters of linear models. In addition, we found a genetically unbiased estimator of the QTL heterozygote mean using a linear function of marker means. In nonlinear models, recombination frequencies are estimated less efficiently than the means of quantitative trait locus genotypes. Recombination frequency estimation efficiency decreases as the distance between markers decreases, because the number of progeny in recombinant marker classes decreases. Mean estimation efficiency is nearly equal for these methods.     

Joint linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci in natural populations

Linkage analysis and allelic association (also referred to as linkage disequilibrium) studies are two major approaches for mapping genes that control simple or complex traits in plants, animals, and humans. But these two approaches have limited utility when used alone, because they use only part of the information that is available for a mapping population. More recently, a new mapping strategy has been designed to integrate the advantages of linkage analysis and linkage disequilibrium analysis for genome mapping in outcrossing populations. The new strategy makes use of a random sample from a panmictic population and the open-pollinated progeny of the sample. In this article, we extend the new strategy to map quantitative trait loci (QTL), using molecular markers within the EM-implemented maximum-likelihood framework. The most significant advantage of this extension is that both linkage and linkage disequilibrium between a marker and QTL can be estimated simultaneously, thus increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of genome mapping for recalcitrant outcrossing species. Simulation studies are performed to test the statistical properties of the MLEs of genetic and genomic parameters including QTL allele frequency, QTL effects, QTL position, and the linkage disequilibrium of the QTL and a marker. The potential utility of our mapping strategy is discussed.