核酸适配体在感染性疾病诊治中的研究进展

临床上,感染性疾病由于诊断不明或诊断时间较长导致严重后果的情况并不罕见。近年来,由于新型病原体感染报道层出不穷,现有病原体出现耐药也十分普遍,导致感染性疾病的诊断和治疗仍是临床上亟待解决的难题。核酸适配体是通过体外反复筛选或指数富集配体系统进化(systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment,SELEX)技术筛选出来的一类具有特异性识别能力的寡核苷酸序列,具有靶向结合目标分子的能力,可用于病原体检测和新型治疗性药物的开发。适配体已在感染性疾病诊治中显现良好的应用前景,进一步推进相关研究有望为感染性疾病的诊治提供新的途径。     

Comparing the clinical and histological diagnosis of leprosy and leprosy reactions in the INFIR cohort of Indian patients with multibacillary leprosy

Background

The ILEP Nerve Function Impairment in Reaction (INFIR) is a cohort study designed to identify predictors of reactions and nerve function impairment in leprosy. The aim was to study correlations between clinical and histological diagnosis of reactions.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Three hundred and three newly diagnosed patients with World Health Organization multibacillary (MB) leprosy from two centres in India were enrolled in the study. Skin biopsies taken at enrolment were assessed using a standardised proforma to collect data on the histological diagnosis of leprosy, leprosy reactions and the certainty level of the diagnosis. The pathologist diagnosed definite or probable Type 1 Reactions (T1R) in 113 of 265 biopsies from patients at risk of developing reactions whereas clinicians diagnosed skin only reactions in 39 patients and 19 with skin and nerve involvement. Patients with Borderline Tuberculoid (BT) leprosy had a clinical diagnosis rate of reactions of 43% and a histological diagnosis rate of 61%; for patients with Borderline Lepromatous (BL) leprosy the clinical and histological diagnosis rates were 53.7% and 46.2% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis for T1R was 53.1% and 61.9% for BT patients and 61.1% and 71.0% for BL patients. Erythema Nodosum Leprosum (ENL) was diagnosed clinically in two patients but histologically in 13 patients. The Ridley-Jopling classification of patients (n = 303) was 42.8% BT, 27.4% BL, 9.4% Lepromatous Leprosy (LL), 13.0% Indeterminate and 7.4% with non-specific inflammation. This data shows that MB classification is very heterogeneous and encompasses patients with no detectable bacteria and high immunological activity through to patients with high bacterial loads.

Conclusions/Significance

Leprosy reactions may be under-diagnosed by clinicians and increasing biopsy rates would help in the diagnosis of reactions. Future studies should look at sub-clinical T1R and ENL and whether they have impact on clinical outcomes.     

Thalidomide in the treatment of leprosy

Leprosy is a chronic infection of the skin and nerves caused by Mycobacterium leprae. Erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) is a reactive state in lepromatous leprosy. Thalidomide has been used to treat ENL since the 1960s. One of its mechanisms of action is anti-inflammatory through selective inhibition of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha produced by monocytes.     

Epidemiological approach to the paleopathological diagnosis of leprosy

In paleopathology it is usually assumed that modern diagnostic criteria can be applied to infectious diseases in the past. However, as both the human species and populations of pathogenic microorganisms undergo evolutionary changes, this assumption is not always well-founded. To get valid estimates of the frequency (the point prevalence at death) of leprosy in skeletal samples, sensitivity, specificity, and sample frequency must be estimated simultaneously. It is shown that more than three symptoms must be evaluated in at least three samples in order to reach estimates with well-described properties. The method is applied to three skeletal samples from Medieval Denmark; the samples were scored for the presence of seven osteological conditions indicating leprosy. For the osteological conditions, sensitivity varied from 0.36-0.80, and specificity from 0.58-0.98. The frequency of leprosy in the three samples was: Odense (a lepers' institution), 0.98, 95% CI 0.64-1.00; Malm? (urban cemetery), 0.02, 95% CI 0.00-0.07; and Tirup (rural cemetery), 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.46. It is concluded that it is indeed possible to estimate disease frequencies without reference to modern standards, and that leprosy occurred with widely differing frequencies in different segments of the Medieval population in southern Scandinavia.     

New biomarkers with relevance to leprosy diagnosis applicable in areas hyperendemic for leprosy

Leprosy is not eradicable with currently available diagnostics or interventions, as evidenced by its stable incidence. Early diagnosis of Mycobacterium leprae infection should therefore be emphasized in leprosy research. It remains challenging to develop tests based on immunological biomarkers that distinguish individuals controlling bacterial replication from those developing disease. To identify biomarkers for field-applicable diagnostics, we determined cytokines/chemokines induced by M. leprae proteins in blood of leprosy patients and endemic controls (EC) from high leprosy-prevalence areas (Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia) and from South Korea, where leprosy is not endemic anymore. M. leprae-sonicate-induced IFN-γ was similar for all groups, excluding M. leprae/IFN-γ as a diagnostic readout. By contrast, ML2478 and ML0840 induced high IFN-γ concentrations in Bangladeshi EC, which were completely absent for South Korean controls. Importantly, ML2478/IFN-γ could indicate distinct degrees of M. leprae exposure, and thereby the risk of infection and transmission, in different parts of Brazilian and Ethiopian cities. Notwithstanding these discriminatory responses, M. leprae proteins did not distinguish patients from EC in one leprosy-endemic area based on IFN-γ. Analyses of additional cytokines/chemokines showed that M. leprae and ML2478 induced significantly higher concentrations of MCP-1, MIP-1β, and IL-1β in patients compared with EC, whereas IFN-inducible protein-10, like IFN-γ, differed between EC from areas with dissimilar leprosy prevalence. This study identifies M. leprae-unique Ags, particularly ML2478, as biomarker tools to measure M. leprae exposure using IFN-γ or IFN-inducible protein-10, and also shows that MCP-1, MIP-1β, and IL-1β can potentially distinguish pathogenic immune responses from those induced during asymptomatic exposure to M. leprae.     

CRISPR-Cas13a系统用于肿瘤诊断与治疗的进展

CRISPR-Cas系统是一种目前已知的基因编辑工具,其中以靶向DNA基因组编辑的CRISPR-Cas9系统的研究较为成熟。相较于靶向DNA的基因组编辑技术CRISPR-Cas9系统,近年来靶向RNA的Ⅵ型-CRISPR家族CRISPR-C2c2/Cas13a系统研究日渐增多。CRISPR-Cas13a系统具有特异性识别并结合单链RNA序列从而非特异性切割RNA的特点,可应用于检测肿瘤外周血游离核酸,对早期肿瘤患者进行筛查。同时,Cas13a在进行体内RNA切割的过程中,不涉及编码基因DNA的改变,可直接对基因转录产物mRNA进行编辑,达到基因修饰的目的,并能够同时靶向多基因转录产物从而调控基因的表达。Cas13a系统可应用于分子诊断及RNA编辑中,该系统在肿瘤的诊断与治疗中也被证实具有广阔的发展前景。基于已有的文献资料,文中综述了靶向RNA的CRISPR-Cas13a技术应用于肿瘤诊断与治疗的研究进展,探讨了CRISPR-Cas13a系统对癌症治疗的新思路及存在的局限,并展望了未来可能的研究方向。     

Relapses after multibacillary leprosy treatment

Leprosy relapses are mainly due to bacillary persistence and diamino-diphenyl-sulphone (DDS) monotherapy. Case histories were examined for 33 patients with lepromatous leprosy (LL), diagnosed 7-48 years before the relapse and treated only with DDS during 4 to 38 years. Twenty-eight patients received irregular non-supervised polychemotherapy (PCT) since 1983. Five patients received only DDS, and presented relapses 13-20 years after the treatment was stopped. Relapses were diagnosed by clinical methods, including the reappearance of lesions or presence of new anesthetic areas. All cases were confirmed by bacilloscopy, and a subset of 20 cases by skin biopsy. Four patients presented indeterminate leprosy (IL) and one patient borderline tuberculoid leprosy (BT) in the biopsy. The latter 5 demonstrated presence of intraneural bacilli; the remainder were LL. Two patients relapsed even with PCT treatment. The others were cured with supervised PCT. Predisposing factors for relapses were as follows: DDS monotherapy, irregular PCT with inadequate dosage, unsupervised treatment, treatment uncompliance, and inadequate relationship between the patient and the health staff. Inspections for relapse in leprosy is recommended for in all multibacillary patients that were treated with DDS. The clinical appearance of new lesions or new anesthetic zones, the bacilloscopy and skin biopsy, used together, are effective in establishing the presence of relapses.