Non-disjunction as proof of tile chromosome theory of heredity

Ohne Zusammenfassung

---

Non-disjunction as proof of tile chromosome theory of heredity

     

Discovery of phytopathogenic bacteria 100 years ago: transatlantic controversies and polemics

The demonstration of a bacterial cause of some plant diseases has been claimed few years after it was commonly recognized that bacteria were able to cause diseases of human and animal. Nevertheless, some sharp controversies took place, between German and American specialists (1897-1901), before the existence of bacterial diseases of plants was accepted by all phytopathologists. Nowadays, about 350 bacteria are described, which infect plants: they are pathovars, or subspecies, belonging to 21 genera. Bacterial diseases of plants can be classified into three major categories according to the type of symptoms shown by the infected plant: necrosis and wilt, soft-rot, tumour. The interaction between bacteria and plant cells is usually established from the apoplast, although some bacteria are xylem or phloem limited. This interaction involves an original protein secretion system (which is also described in bacteria pathogenic for animals), hydrolytic enzymes (pectinases, cellulases), toxins and/or phytohormones. Bacteria of one group (Agrobacterium) modify the plant metabolism after gene transfer from a plasmid. On the economic and social point of view, these diseases may be limiting factors of some key-productions (rice, cassava). In addition, they play a role in reducing the quality of agricultural products (reduced growth, spots on leaves and fruits). Control of bacterial diseases is limited. It relies usually on a combination of prophylaxy, chemical applications, and use of resistant genotypes.     

Emil Heitz and the concept of heterochromatin: longitudinal chromosome differentiation was recognized fifty years ago.

The work of Emil Heitz (1892--1965) laid one of the keystones of cytogenetics. Using a new in situ method, he established between 1928 and 1935 the longitudinal differentiation of chromosomes in euchromatin (genetically active) and heterochromatin (genetically inert). He recognized the association of satellited chromosomes with the formation of the nucleolus, co-discovered the giant salivary chromosomes of diptera, and arrived at a cytological and genetic concept of chromosome structure that has been found essentially correct to date. Yet, Emil Heitz did not gain due recognition by his contemporaries, suffered from the political disturbances of his time, and spent almost a lifetime in isolation, bolstered only by the conviction that his scientific work was significant.     

How theories became knowledge: Morgan's chromosome theory of heredity in America and Britain

T. H. Morgan, A. H. Sturtevant, H. J. Muller and C. B. Bridges published their comprehensive treatise The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity in 1915. By 1920 Morgan's ``Chromosome Theory of Heredity' was generally accepted by geneticists in the United States, and by British geneticists by 1925. By 1930 it had been incorporated into most general biology, botany, and zoology textbooks as established knowledge. In this paper, I examine the reasons why it was accepted as part of a series of comparative studies of theory-acceptance in the sciences. In this context it is of interest to look at the persuasiveness of confirmed novel predictions, a factor often regarded by philosophers of science as the most important way to justify a theory. Here it turns out to play a role in the decision of some geneticists to accept the theory, but is generally less important than the CTH's ability to explain Mendelian inheritance, sex-linked inheritance, non-disjunction, and the connection between linkage groups and the number of chromosome pairs; in other words, to establish a firm connection between genetics and cytology. It is remarkable that geneticists were willing to accept the CTH as applicable to all organisms at a time when it had been confirmed only for Drosophila. The construction of maps showing the location on the chromosomes of genes for specific characters was especially convincing for non-geneticists.     

One hundred years ago : Fashion and medicine

Objective: To determine which attributes of clinical practice guidelines influence the use of guidelines in decision making in clinical practice. Design: Observational study relating the use of 47 different recommendations from 10 national clinical guidelines to 12 different attributes of clinical guidelines—for example, evidence based, controversial, concrete. Setting: General practice in the Netherlands. Subjects: 61 general practitioners who made 12 880 decisions in their contacts with patients. Main outcome measures: Compliance of decisions with clinical guidelines according to the attribute of the guideline. Results: Recommendations were followed in, on average, 61% (7915/12 880) of the decisions. Controversial recommendations were followed in 35% (886/2497) of decisions and non-controversial recommendations in 68% (7029/10 383) of decisions. Vague and non-specific recommendations were followed in 36% (826/2280) of decisions and clear recommendations in 67% (7089/10 600) of decisions. Recommendations that demanded a change in existing practice routines were followed in 44% (1278/2912) of decisions and those that did not in 67% (6637/9968) of decisions. Evidence based recommendations were used more than recommendations for practice that were not based on research evidence (71% (2745/3841) v 57% (5170/9039)). Conclusions: People and organisations setting evidence based clinical practice guidelines should take into account some of the other important attributes of effective recommendations for clinical practice.

Key messages

• Specific attributes of clinical practice guidelines determine whether they are used in practice
• Evidence based recommendations are better followed in practice than recommendations not based on scientific evidence
• Precise definitions of recommended performance improve the use of guidelines
• Testing the feasibility and acceptance of clinical guidelines among the target group is important for effective implementation
• People setting evidence based guidelines need to understand the attributes of effective guidelines