The subcellular localization of histamine and histamine methyltransferase in rat brain

Abstract— We have examined the subcellular localization of histamine and histamine methyl-transferase (S-adenosylmethionine: histamine 7V-methyltransferase; EC 2.1.1.8) in rat brain. The highest levels of histamine and histamine methyltransferase activity were found in the hypothalamus. A large proportion of hypothalamic histamine and histamine methyltransferase activity was found in particles with sedimentation properties in sucrose gradients similar to synaptosomes storing norepinephrine and serotonin. Histamine displayed a bimodal distribution in sucrose gradients. A substantial amount of a tracer dose of [³H]histamine added to hypothalamic homogenates at 4°C was bound to particulate fractions, suggesting that endogenous histamine may redistribute and bind to subcellular fractions during homogenization. The second, lighter peak of histamine in sucrose gradients was thought to be due to histamine that redistributed during homogenization.     

Effect of histamine and histamine antagonists on the glycogen content of Tetrahymena

The glycogen content of Tetrahymena pyriformis was analysed by a cytophotometric method. Histamine and histamine antagonists were found to influence the glycogen content. It increases after acute histamine treatment, while it decreases after 4 days incubation with histamine. The H2 receptor antagonist methiamide was more effective than histamine, while the H1 receptor antagonist phenindamine had no effect on the glycogen content. The effect reflects the similarity or dissimilarity of the chemical structure of the antagonists and of histamine. Subdivision of the cytophotometric results indicated that all of the protozoa react to histamine or to its antagonists, but all agents increased the number of glycogen-rich Tetrahymena.     

Refractoriness for ultrasonically nebulized distilled water and histamine after histamine challenge

Refractoriness for bronchial provocation frequently occurs after different challenge tests used to assess bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients. We investigated whether histamine inhalation could cause refractoriness for bronchoconstriction induced by ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW) and whether histamine causes tachyphylaxis for a subsequent histamine challenge in nine stable asthmatic patients. Preinhalation of histamine induced a significant diminished bronchoconstrictor response to UNDW cumulative dose of inhaled UNDW causing a 20% fall in forced expired volume in 1 s. The mean increased from 3.5 +/- 0.8 to 11.8 +/- 2.6 (SE) ml after histamine challenge (P less than 0.01). However, repeated inhalation of histamine did not change the bronchoconstrictor response to histamine within 1 h after rechallenge (P greater than 0.5). The magnitude of refractoriness for UNDW inhalation after preinhalation of histamine was correlated to the bronchoconstrictor response to histamine (r = 0.73, P less than 0.05). We conclude that inhaled histamine can induce refractoriness for UNDW, which seems to be related to the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness.     

Binding of histamine and histamine analogs to lymphocyte subsets analyzed by flow cytometry

The binding of histamine, 4-methylhistamine (a histamine type 2 receptor agonist), cimetidine (a histamine type 2 receptor antagonist), and telemethylhistamine (an inactive analog) to human peripheral blood mononuclear cell subsets was investigated by flow cytometry by using conjugates of these ligands coupled to fluorescein-labeled human serum albumin. Our results indicate that binding of fluorescent protein conjugates of histamine and its analogs does not selectively identify a lymphocyte subset(s) that mediates the immunomodulatory effects of histaminergic ligands. Conjugates with both low (2.5 to 2.8:1) and high (28 to 57:1) ligand to protein coupling ratios were used. No binding above background could be detected for the low mole ratio reagents. The high mole ratio reagents were bound by 95 to 99% of all lymphocytes when used at ligand concentrations of 50 microM or greater. At lower ligand concentrations, the number of lymphocytes exceeding a set fluorescence threshold was decreased, but fluorescence distributions remained unimodal at all concentrations used (1 to 500 microM). Monocytes also bound the high mole ratio reagents and gave rise to a second high-intensity peak in the fluorescence distribution unless they were excluded by other means. Levels of conjugate binding detected by flow cytometry did not parallel ligand potencies at classical histamine type 2 receptors; at equivalent ligand concentrations, approximately equal amounts of histamine or 4-methylhistamine conjugate were bound per lymphocyte, and only 30% less telemethylhistamine conjugate was bound. Competition with free ligands (10(2)- to 10(4)-fold excess histamine, 4-methylhistamine, cimetidine, or telemethylhistamine) did not significantly decrease the level of binding observed for the high mole ratio reagents at bound ligand concentrations of 1 to 25 microM. Dual staining with fluorescein-labeled conjugate and phycoerythrin-labeled monoclonal antibodies Leu-3ab (anti-helper T), Leu-2a (anti-suppressor T), Leu-M3 (anti-monocyte), or anti-HLA-DR (B cells and monocytes) was also carried out. The extent of conjugate binding to helper and suppressor cells was identical for each of the ligands used, but higher levels of conjugate binding were seen for monocytes and B cells than for T cells in every case. Our data do not exclude the possibility of enhanced conjugate binding to small numbers of activated (HLA-DR positive) T cells that might be involved in mediation of histamine effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Localization of histamine and histamine H2-receptor antagonists in the gastric mucosa.

Synopsis Histamine stimulates acid secretion by the parietal cell and this secretion is inhibited by the histamine H₂-receptor antagonists. Whole body autoradiography showed that radioactivity from¹⁴C-histamine was localized in the artery walls of the stomach and in the muscularis mucosae, but that the level in the fundic mucosa was the same as the blood.When the H₂-receptor antagonists burimamide, metiamide and cimetidine were labelled with³⁵S,¹⁴C or³H and dosed to rats, whole body autoradiography showed that the stomach was predominantly labelled in the glandular mucosa from 5 to 120 min after administration. Microautoradiography in the rat and dog after intravenous injection of [³H] metiamide or [³H] cimetidine demonstrated an uptake of tritium in the parietal cell cytoplasm that was 3- to 4-times greater than that found in adjacent peptic cells or areas of muscularis mucosa. The preferential labelling persisted at a low level up to 6 h after injection in the rat. The localization of radioactivity from the H₂-antagonists in the parietal cell cytoplasm correlates well with their pharmacological activity in preventing acid secretion from this cell.