Expression,subcellular localization and protein‑protein interaction of four isoforms of EcR/USP in the common cutworm

Ecdysone receptor (EcR) and ultraspiracle (USP) form heterodimers to mediate ecdysteroid signaling during molting and metamorphosis. Various EcR/USP heterodimers have been reported. However, it is unclear what kind of EcR/USP combination is adopted by lepidopteran insects during the larval?pupal metamorphosis and whether the EcR/USP heterodimer varies among different tissues. To address these questions, two isoforms of each EcR and USP were cloned from the common cutworm, their messenger RNA expression patterns were examined by real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction in different tissues during the larval–pupal metamorphosis and in the midgut in response to hormonal induction. Furthermore, their subcellular localization and protein?protein interaction were explored by transient expression and far‐western blotting, respectively. All the four genes were significantly up‐regulated in prepuae and/or pupae. The expression profiles of EcRB1 and USP1 were nearly identical to each other in the epidermis, fat body and midgut, and a similar situation also applied to EcRA and USP2. The three genes responded to 20‐hydroxyecdysone (20E) induction except for USP2, and USP1 could be up‐regulated by both 20E and juvenile hormone. The four proteins mainly localized in the nucleus and the nuclear localization was promoted by 20E. The protein?protein interaction between each EcR and USP was found in vitro. These results suggest that two types of EcR/USP heterodimer (EcRA/USP2 and EcRB1/USP1) may exist simultaneously in the common cutworm, and the latter should play more important roles during the larval?pupal metamorphosis. In addition, the types of EcR/USP heterodimer do not vary in the tissues which undergo histolysis and regeneration during metamorphosis.     

The importance of exportin and Ran for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the ecdysteroid receptor

Nuclear localization of the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) is increased in HeLa cells if exportin-1 (CRM1), a predominant carrier for export of proteins and RNA from the nucleus into the cytoplasm, is knocked down by siRNA against exportin. However, knockdown of the small G protein Ran, which is essential for nuclear transport, leads to an arrest of EcR in the cytoplasm, but does not prevent efficient nuclear import of the most important heterodimerization partner of EcR, ultraspiracle (Usp). Like in vertebrate cells, EcR is also distributed heterogeneously in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells but shifted exclusively to the nucleus, if Usp is present.     

Influence of hormone on intracellular localization of the Drosophila melanogaster ecdysteroid receptor (EcR)

In the absence of hormone the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) is distributed between the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Addition of the hormone muristerone A increases nuclear localization of wild type EcR within 5–10 min. Mutation of M504 to alanine, an amino acid, which is essential for ligand binding and which is situated in helix 5 of the ligand binding domain, abolishes hormone binding but still allows nuclear localization at only slightly reduced levels in the absence of hormone, whereas nuclear localization of EcR^M504R is nearly abolished. Cotransfection with ultraspiracle (USP), the invertebrate ortholog of RXR, leads to exclusively nuclear localization of wild type EcR and EcR^M504A indicating that basal heterodimerization in the absence of hormone is still possible. In the presence of Usp, EcR^M504R is only partially localized in the nucleus. EMSA experiments show that the ligand muristerone A enhances binding of wild type EcR, but only slighthly of mutated EcRs, to the canonical hsp 27 ecdysone response element. This is confirmed by transactivation studies. The results indicate that the architecture of the E-domain of EcR is important for nuclear localization even in the absence of a ligand.     

Interaction of proteins involved in ecdysone and juvenile hormone signal transduction

Ecdysteroids and juvenile hormones (JH) regulate a variety of developmental, physiological, behavioral, and metabolic processes. Ecdysteroids function through a heterodimeric complex of two nuclear receptors, ecdysone receptor (EcR) and ultraspiracle (USP). An 85 kDa protein identified in Drosophila melanogaster methoprene-tolerant (Met) mutant binds to JH III with high affinity, and the mutant flies are resistant to juvenile hormone analog (JHA), methoprene. Reporter assays using the yeast two-hybrid system were performed in order to study the molecular interactions between EcR, USP and Met. As expected, EcR fused to the B42 activation domain and USP fused to the LexA DNA binding domain interacted with each other and supported induction of the reporter gene in the presence of stable ecdysteroid analog, RG-102240 or steroids, muristerone A and ponasterone A. The USP:USP homodimers supported expression of the reporter gene in the absence of ligand, and there was no significant increase in the reporter activity after addition of a JHA, methoprene. Similarly, Met:Met homodimers as well as Met:EcR and Met:USP heterodimers induced reporter activity in the absence of ligand and addition of ecdysteroid or JH analogs did not increase the reporter activity regulated by either homodimers or heterodimers of Met protein. Two-hybrid assays in insect cells and in vitro pull-down assays confirmed the interaction of Met with EcR and USP. These data suggest that the proteins that are involved in signal transduction of ecdysteroids (EcR and USP) and juvenile hormones (Met) interact to mediate cross-talk between these two important hormones. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2008. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Functional studies on the ligand-binding domain of Ultraspiracle from Drosophila melanogaster

The functional insect ecdysteroid receptor is comprised of the ecdysone receptor (EcR) and Ultraspiracle (USP). The ligand-binding domain (LBD) of USP was fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (GAL4-DBD) and characterized by analyzing the effect of site-directed mutations in the LBD. Normal and mutant proteins were tested for ligand and DNA binding, dimerization, and their ability to induce gene expression. The presence of helix 12 proved to be essential for DNA binding and was necessary to confer efficient ecdysteroid binding to the heterodimer with the EcR (LBD), but did not influence dimerization. The antagonistic position of helix 12 is indispensible for interaction between the fusion protein and DNA, whereas hormone binding to the EcR (LBD) was only partially reduced if fixation of helix 12 was disturbed. The mutation of amino acids, which presumably bind to a fatty acid evoked a profound negative influence on transactivation ability, although enhanced transactivation potency and ligand binding to the ecdysteroid receptor was impaired to varying degrees by mutation of these residues. Mutations of one fatty acid-binding residue within the ligand-binding pocket, 1323, however, evoked enhanced transactivation. The results confirmed that the LBD of Ultraspiracle modifies ecdysteroid receptor function through intermolecular interactions and demonstrated that the ligand-binding pocket of USP modifies the DNA-binding and transactivation abilities of the fusion protein.     

Ligand-induced heterodimerization between the ligand binding domains of the Drosophila ecdysteroid receptor and ultraspiracle.

The insect ecdysteroid receptor consists of a heterodimer between EcR and the RXR-orthologue, USP. We addressed the question of whether this heterodimer, like all other RXR heterodimers, may be formed in the absence of ligand and whether ligand promotes dimerization. We found that C-terminal protein fragments that comprised the ligand binding, but not the DNA binding domain of EcR and USP and which were equipped with the activation or DNA binding region of GAL4, respectively, exhibit a weak ability to interact spontaneously with each other. Moreover, the heterodimer formation is greatly enhanced upon administration of active ecdysteroids in a dose-dependent manner. This was shown in vivo by a yeast two-hybrid system and in vitro by a modified electromobility shift assay. Furthermore, the EcR fragment expressed in yeast was functional and bound radioactively labelled ecdysteroid specifically. Ligand binding was greatly enhanced by the presence of a USP ligand binding domain. Therefore, ecdysteroids are capable of inducing heterodimer formation between EcR and USP, even when the binding of these receptor proteins to cognate DNA response elements does not occur. This capability may be a regulated aspect of ecdysteroid action during insect development.     

Molecular determinants of differential ligand sensitivities of insect ecdysteroid receptors

The functional receptor for insect ecdysteroid hormones is a heterodimer consisting of two nuclear hormone receptors, ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) and the retinoid X receptor homologue Ultraspiracle (USP). Although ecdysone is commonly thought to be a hormone precursor and 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E), the physiologically active steroid, little is known about the relative activity of ecdysteroids in various arthropods. As a step toward characterization of potential differential ligand recognition, we have analyzed the activities of various ecdysteroids using gel mobility shift assays and transfection assays in Schneider-2 (S2) cells. Ecdysone showed little activation of the Drosophila melanogaster receptor complex (DmEcR-USP). In contrast, this steroid functioned as a potent ligand for the mosquito Aedes aegypti receptor complex (AaEcR-USP), significantly enhancing DNA binding and transactivating a reporter gene in S2 cells. The mosquito receptor also displayed higher hormone-independent DNA binding activity than the Drosophila receptor. Subunit-swapping experiments indicated that the EcR protein, not the USP protein, was responsible for ligand specificity. Using domain-swapping techniques, we made a series of Aedes and Drosophila EcR chimeric constructs. Differential ligand responsiveness was mapped near the C terminus of the ligand binding domain, within the identity box previously implicated in the dimerization specificity of nuclear receptors. This region includes helices 9 and 10, as determined by comparison with available crystal structures obtained from other nuclear receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that Phe529 in Aedes EcR, corresponding to Tyr611 in Drosophila EcR, was most critical for ligand specificity and hormone-independent DNA binding activity. These results demonstrated that ecdysone could function as a bona fide ligand in a species-specific manner.     

Impact of heterodimerization on intracellular localization of the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR)

Initially, nuclear import of the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) in vertebrate cells (CHO-K1 and COS-7) does not afford a heterodimerization partner. Later on, EcR is retained in the nucleus only in the presence of a heterodimerization partner. Ultraspiracle (Usp) is more efficient compared to its vertebrate orthologue RXR and leads to an exclusively nuclear localization of EcR even in the absence of ligand. The DNA binding domain of the heterodimerization partner is important for retainment of EcR in the nucleus as shown by Usp4 (Usp(R130C)), which has lost its DNA binding capability. The C-terminal end of Usp (Usp(Delta205-508)) encompassing the C-terminal part of the D-domain and the E- and F-domains are essential for retainment of EcR in the nucleus. Nuclear localization is further influenced by cell-specific factors, since hormone and heterodimerization stabilizes the EcR protein in a cell-specific way.     

Spatial patterns of ecdysteroid receptor activation during the onset of Drosophila metamorphosis

Ecdysteroid signaling in insects is transduced by a heterodimer of the EcR and USP nuclear receptors. In order to monitor the temporal and spatial patterns of ecdysteroid signaling in vivo we established transgenic animals that express a fusion of the GAL4 DNA binding domain and the ligand binding domain (LBD) of EcR or USP, combined with a GAL4-dependent lacZ reporter gene. The patterns of beta-galactosidase expression in these animals indicate where and when the GAL4-LBD fusion protein has been activated by its ligand in vivo. We show that the patterns of GAL4-EcR and GAL4-USP activation at the onset of metamorphosis reflect what would be predicted for ecdysteroid activation of the EcR/USP heterodimer. No activation is seen in mid-third instar larvae when the ecdysteroid titer is low, and strong widespread activation is observed at the end of the instar when the ecdysteroid titer is high. In addition, both GAL4-EcR and GAL4-USP are activated in larval organs cultured with 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E), consistent with EcR/USP acting as a 20E receptor. We also show that GAL4-USP activation depends on EcR, suggesting that USP requires its heterodimer partner to function as an activator in vivo. Interestingly, we observe no GAL4-LBD activation in the imaginal discs and ring glands of late third instar larvae. Addition of 20E to cultured mid-third instar imaginal discs results in GAL4-USP activation, but this response is not seen in imaginal discs cultured from late third instar larvae, suggesting that EcR/USP loses its ability to function as an efficient activator in this tissue. We conclude that EcR/USP activation by the systemic ecdysteroid signal may be spatially restricted in vivo. Finally, we show that GAL4-EcR functions as a potent and specific dominant negative at the onset of metamorphosis, providing a new tool for characterizing ecdysteroid signaling pathways during development.     

Expression of ecdysteroid receptor and ultraspiracle from Chironomus tentans (Insecta, Diptera) in E. coli and purification in a functional state.

Full length clones of ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) and Ultraspiracle (USP) from Chironomus tentans were expressed as GST fusion proteins in E. coli and purified by affinity chromatography. The absence of detergents during the purification procedure is essential for retaining receptor function, especially ligand binding. Presence of USP is mandatory for ligand binding to EcR, but no other cofactors or posttranslational modifications seem to be important, since Scatchard plots revealed the same characteristics (two high affinity binding sites for Ponasterone A with K(D1)=0.24+/-0.1nM and K(D2)=3.9+/-1.3.nM) as found in 0.4 M NaCl extracts of Chironomus cells. Gel mobility shift assays showed binding of the heterodimer to PAL and DR5 even after removal of the GST-tag, whereas EcR binding to PAL1 is GST-dependent. USP binds preferentially to DR5. Addition of unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate improves ligand binding only slightly. Removal of GST has no effect on (3)H-ponasterone A binding, but alters DNA binding characteristics. Calculation of specific binding (5.3+3.0 nmol/mg GST EcR) revealed that 47+/-26% of purified receptor protein was able to bind ligand. The addition of purified EcR to cell extracts of hormone resistant subclones of the epithelial cell line from C. tentans, which have lost their ability to bind ligand, restores specific binding of (3)H-ponasterone A.     

hormone nuclear receptor (EcR) exhibits circadian cycling in certain tissues, but not others, during development in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera)

The insect moulting hormones, viz. the ecdysteroids, regulate gene expression during development by binding to an intracellular protein, the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR). In the insect Rhodnius prolixus, circulating levels of ecdysteroids exhibit a robust circadian rhythm. This paper demonstrates associated circadian rhythms in the abundance and distribution of EcR in several major target tissues of ecdysteroids, but not in others. Quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence images obtained by confocal laser-scanning microscopy following the use of anti-EcR has revealed a marked daily rhythm in the nuclear abundance of EcR in cells of the abdominal epidermis, brain, fat body, oenocytes and rectal epithelium of Rhodnius. This EcR rhythm is synchronous with the rhythm of circulating hormone levels. It free-runs in continuous darkness for several cycles, showing that EcR nuclear abundance is under circadian control. Circadian control of a nuclear receptor has not been shown previously in any animal. We infer that the above cell types detect and respond to the temporal signals in the rhythmic ecdysteroid titre. In several cell types, the rhythm in cytoplasmic EcR peaks several hours prior to the EcR peak in the nucleus each day, thereby implying a daily migration of EcR from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. This finding shows that EcR is not a constitutive nuclear receptor, as has previously been assumed. In the brain, rhythmic nuclear EcR has been found in peptidergic neurosecretory cells, indicating a potential pathway for feedback regulation of the neuroendocrine system by ecdysteroids, and also in regions containing circadian clock neurons, suggesting that the circadian timing system in the brain is also sensitive to rhythmic ecdysteroid signals. This work was supported by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.