Src kinase activity and SH2 domain regulate the dynamics of Src association with lipid and protein targets

Src functions depend on its association with the plasma membrane and with specific membrane-associated assemblies. Many aspects of these interactions are unclear. We investigated the functions of kinase, SH2, and SH3 domains in Src membrane interactions. We used FRAP beam-size analysis in live cells expressing a series of c-Src-GFP proteins with targeted mutations in specific domains together with biochemical experiments to determine whether the mutants can generate and bind to phosphotyrosyl proteins. Wild-type Src displays lipid-like membrane association, whereas constitutively active Src-Y527F interacts transiently with slower-diffusing membrane-associated proteins. These interactions require Src kinase activity and SH2 binding, but not SH3 binding. Furthermore, overexpression of paxillin, an Src substrate with a high cytoplasmic population, competes with membrane phosphotyrosyl protein targets for binding to activated Src. Our observations indicate that the interactions of Src with lipid and protein targets are dynamic and that the kinase and SH2 domain cooperate in the membrane targeting of Src.     

Heterophilic and homophilic cadherin interactions in intestinal intermicrovillar links are species dependent

Enterocytes are specialized epithelial cells lining the luminal surface of the small intestine that build densely packed arrays of microvilli known as brush borders. These microvilli drive nutrient absorption and are arranged in a hexagonal pattern maintained by intermicrovillar links formed by 2 nonclassical members of the cadherin superfamily of calcium-dependent cell adhesion proteins: protocadherin-24 (PCDH24, also known as CDHR2) and the mucin-like protocadherin (CDHR5). The extracellular domains of these proteins are involved in heterophilic and homophilic interactions important for intermicrovillar function, yet the structural determinants of these interactions remain unresolved. Here, we present X-ray crystal structures of the PCDH24 and CDHR5 extracellular tips and analyze their species-specific features relevant for adhesive interactions. In parallel, we use binding assays to identify the PCDH24 and CDHR5 domains involved in both heterophilic and homophilic adhesion for human and mouse proteins. Our results suggest that homophilic and heterophilic interactions involving PCDH24 and CDHR5 are species dependent with unique and distinct minimal adhesive units.

Structures of the extracellular tips of PCDH24 and CDHR5, the proteins that form functionally important links between gut microvilli, reveal the minimum units used by these proteins to mediate adhesion, and provide insights into species-dependent interactions and functionality in the cadherin superfamily.     

Membrane binding domains

Eukaryotic signaling and trafficking proteins are rich in modular domains that bind cell membranes. These binding events are tightly regulated in space and time. The structural, biochemical, and biophysical mechanisms for targeting have been worked out for many families of membrane binding domains. This review takes a comparative view of seven major classes of membrane binding domains, the C1, C2, PH, FYVE, PX, ENTH, and BAR domains. These domains use a combination of specific headgroup interactions, hydrophobic membrane penetration, electrostatic surface interactions, and shape complementarity to bind to specific subcellular membranes.     

Signals involved in targeting membrane proteins to synaptic vesicles

1. Synaptic vesicles (SVs) mediate fast regulated secretion of classical neurotransmitters. In order to perform their task SVs rely on a restrict set of membrane proteins. The mechanisms responsible for targeting these proteins to the SV membrane are still poorly understood.2. Likewise, little is known about the intracellular routes taken by these proteins in their way to SV membrane. Recently, several domains and motifs necessary for correct localization of SV proteins have been identified.3. In this review we summarize the sequence motifs that have been identified in the cytoplasmic domains of SV proteins that are involved in endocytosis and targeting of SVs. We suggest that the vesicular acetylcholine transporter, a protein found predominantly in synaptic vesicles, is perhaps a model protein to understand the pathways and interactions that are used for synaptic vesicle targeting.     

Correct targeting of plant ARF GTPases relies on distinct protein domains

Indispensable membrane trafficking events depend on the activity of conserved small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases), anchored to individual organelle membranes. In plant cells, it is currently unknown how these proteins reach their correct target membranes and interact with their effectors. To address these important biological questions, we studied two members of the ADP ribosylation factor (ARF) GTPase family, ARF1 and ARFB, which are membrane anchored through the same N-terminal myristoyl group but to different target membranes. Specifically, we investigated how ARF1 is targeted to the Golgi and post-Golgi structures, whereas ARFB accumulates at the plasma membrane. While the subcellular localization of ARFB appears to depend on multiple domains including the C-terminal half of the GTPase, the correct targeting of ARF1 is dependent on two domains: an N-terminal ARF1 domain that is necessary for the targeting of the GTPase to membranes and a core domain carrying a conserved MxxE motif that influences the relative distribution of ARF1 between the Golgi and post-Golgi compartments. We also established that the N-terminal ARF1 domain alone was insufficient to maintain an interaction with membranes and that correct targeting is a protein-specific property that depends on the status of the GTP switch. Finally, an ARF1-ARFB chimera containing only the first 18 amino acids from ARF1 was shown to compete with ARF1 membrane binding loci. Although this chimera exhibited GTPase activity in vitro, it was unable to recruit coatomer, a known ARF1 effector, onto Golgi membranes. Our results suggest that the targeting of ARF GTPases to the correct membranes may not only depend on interactions with effectors but also relies on distinct protein domains and further binding partners on the Golgi surface.     

Nuclear speckles and nucleoli targeting by PIP2-PDZ domain interactions

PDZ (Postsynaptic density protein, Disc large, Zona occludens) domains are protein-protein interaction modules that predominate in submembranous scaffolding proteins. Recently, we showed that the PDZ domains of syntenin-1 also interact with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and that this interaction controls the recruitment of the protein to the plasma membrane. Here we evaluate the general importance of PIP2-PDZ domain interactions. We report that most PDZ proteins bind weakly to PIP2, but that syntenin-2, the closest homolog of syntenin-1, binds with high affinity to PIP2 via its PDZ domains. Surprisingly, these domains target syntenin-2 to nuclear PIP2 pools, in nuclear speckles and nucleoli. Targeting to these sites is abolished by treatments known to affect these PIP2 pools. Mutational and domain-swapping experiments indicate that high-affinity binding to PIP2 requires both PDZ domains of syntenin-2, but that its first PDZ domain contains the nuclear PIP2 targeting determinants. Depletion of syntenin-2 disrupts the nuclear speckles-PIP2 pattern and affects cell survival and cell division. These findings show that PIP2-PDZ domain interactions can directly contribute to subnuclear assembly processes.     

The N terminus of amphiphysin II mediates dimerization and plasma membrane targeting.

Amphiphysin I and II are nerve terminal-enriched proteins containing SH3 domains that interact with dynamin and synaptojanin. The amphiphysins may function in synaptic vesicle endocytosis by targeting synaptojanin and dynamin to emerging endocytic buds through SH3 domain-independent interactions with clathrin and AP2. We have recently identified and cloned several amphiphysin II splice variants that differentially incorporate clathrin-binding domains. To determine whether these domains function in membrane targeting, we used immunofluorescence to examine the potential localization of amphiphysin II variants to clathrin-coated pits on plasma membranes purified from transfected COS-7 cells. Full-length amphiphysin II targets to the plasma membrane where it partially co-localizes with clathrin. However, splice variants and deletion constructs lacking clathrin-binding domains still target to the plasma membrane, and removal of clathrin from the membrane does not affect amphiphysin II distribution. Surprisingly, plasma membrane targeting was dependent on the presence of a 31-amino acid alternatively spliced sequence at the N terminus of amphiphysin II, a result confirmed using subcellular fractionation. In binding assays, the 31-amino acid sequence was also found to facilitate amphiphysin dimerization mediated through the N terminus. Taken together, these data support a role for the N terminus of amphiphysin II in membrane targeting during endocytosis.     

Phosphoinositide recognition domains

Domains or modules known to bind phosphoinositides have increased dramatically in number over the past few years, and are found in proteins involved in intracellular trafficking, cellular signaling, and cytoskeletal remodeling. Analysis of lipid binding by these domains and its structural basis has provided significant insight into the mechanism of membrane recruitment by the different cellular phosphoinositides. Domains that target only the rare (3-phosphorylated) phosphoinositides must bind with very high affinity, and with exquisite specificity. This is achieved solely by headgroup interactions in the case of certain pleckstrin homology (PH) domains [which bind PtdIns(3,4,5)P₃ and/or PtdIns(3,4)P₂], but requires an additional membrane-insertion and/or oligomerization component in the case of the PtdIns(3)P-targeting phox homology (PX) and FYVE domains. Domains that target PtdIns(4,5)P₂, which is more abundant by some 25-fold, do not require the same stringent affinity and specificity characteristics, and tend to be more diverse in structure. The mode of phosphoinositide binding by different domains also appears to reflect their distinct functions. For example, pleckstrin homology domains that serve as simple targeting domains recognize only phosphoinositide headgroups. By contrast, certain other domains, notably the epsin ENTH domain, appear to promote bilayer curvature by inserting into the membrane upon binding .     

The peroxin Pex19p interacts with multiple, integral membrane proteins at the peroxisomal membrane

Pex19p is a protein required for the early stages of peroxisome biogenesis, but its precise function and site of action are unknown. We tested the interaction between Pex19p and all known Pichia pastoris Pex proteins by the yeast two-hybrid assay. Pex19p interacted with six of seven known integral peroxisomal membrane proteins (iPMPs), and these interactions were confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation. The interactions were not reduced upon inhibition of new protein synthesis, suggesting that they occur with preexisting, and not newly synthesized, pools of iPMPs. By mapping the domains in six iPMPs that interact with Pex19p and the iPMP sequences responsible for targeting to the peroxisome membrane (mPTSs), we found the majority of these sites do not overlap. Coimmunoprecipitation of Pex19p from fractions that contain peroxisomes or cytosol revealed that the interactions between predominantly cytosolic Pex19p and the iPMPs occur in the organelle pellet that contains peroxisomes. These data, taken together, suggest that Pex19p may have a chaperone-like role at the peroxisome membrane and that it is not the receptor for targeting of iPMPs to the peroxisome.     

The molecular basis of the differential subcellular localization of FYVE domains

This study systematically analyzed the structural and mechanistic basis of the regulation of subcellular membrane targeting using FYVE domains as a model. FYVE domains, which mediate the recruitment of signaling and membrane-trafficking proteins to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate-containing endosomes, exhibit distinct subcellular localization despite minor structural variations within the family. Biophysical measurements, cellular imaging, and computational analysis of various FYVE domains showed that the introduction of a single cationic residue and a hydrophobic loop into the membrane binding region of the FYVE domains dramatically enhanced their membrane interactions. The results indicated that there is a threshold affinity for endosomal localization and that endosomal targeting of FYVE domains is sensitive to small changes in membrane affinity about this threshold. Collectively these studies provide new insight into how subcellular localization of FYVE domains and other membrane targeting domains can be regulated by minimal structural and environmental changes.     

Membrane targeting of C2 domains of phospholipase C-delta isoforms.

The C2 domain is a Ca(2+)-dependent membrane-targeting module found in many cellular proteins involved in signal transduction or membrane trafficking. To understand the mechanisms by which the C2 domain mediates the membrane targeting of PLC-delta isoforms, we measured the in vitro membrane binding of the C2 domains of PLC-delta1, -delta3, and -delta4 by surface plasmon resonance and monolayer techniques and their subcellular localization by time-lapse confocal microscopy. The membrane binding of the PLC-delta1-C2 is driven by nonspecific electrostatic interactions between the Ca(2+)-induced cationic surface of protein and the anionic membrane and specific interactions involving Ca(2+), Asn(647), and phosphatidylserine (PS). The PS selectivity of PLC-delta1-C2 governs its specific Ca(2+)-dependent subcellular targeting to the plasma membrane. The membrane binding of the PLC-delta3-C2 also involves Ca(2+)-induced nonspecific electrostatic interactions and PS coordination, and the latter leads to specific subcellular targeting to the plasma membrane. In contrast to PLC-delta1-C2 and PLC-delta3-C2, PLC-delta4-C2 has significant Ca(2+)-independent membrane affinity and no PS selectivity due to the presence of cationic residues in the Ca(2+)-binding loops and the substitution of Ser for the Ca(2+)-coordinating Asp in position 717. Consequently, PLC-delta4-C2 exhibits unique pre-localization to the plasma membrane prior to Ca(2+) import and non-selective Ca(2+)-mediated targeting to various cellular membranes, suggesting that PLC-delta4 might have a novel regulatory mechanism. Together, these results establish the C2 domains of PLC-delta isoforms as Ca(2+)-dependent membrane targeting domains that have distinct membrane binding properties that control their subcellular localization behaviors.     

Membrane targeting by APPL1 and APPL2: dynamic scaffolds that oligomerize and bind phosphoinositides

Human adaptor protein, phosphotyrosine interaction, PH domain and leucine zipper containing 1 (APPL1) and adaptor protein, phosphotyrosine interaction, PH domain and leucine zipper containing 2 (APPL2) are homologous effectors of the small guanosine triphosphatase RAB5 that interact with a diverse set of receptors and signaling proteins and are proposed to function in endosome-mediated signaling. Herein, we investigated the membrane-targeting properties of the APPL1 and APPL2 Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR), pleckstrin homology (PH) and phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domains. Coimmunoprecipitation and yeast two-hybrid studies demonstrated that full-length APPL proteins formed homooligomers and heterooligomers and that the APPL minimal BAR domains were necessary and sufficient for mediating APPL-APPL interactions. When fused to a fluorescent protein and overexpressed, all three domains (minimal BAR, PH and PTB) were targeted to cell membranes. Furthermore, full-length APPL proteins bound to phosphoinositides, and the APPL isolated PH or PTB domains were sufficient for in vitro phosphoinositide binding. Live cell imaging showed that full-length APPL-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) fusion proteins associated with cytosolic membrane structures that underwent movement, fusion and fission events. Overexpression of full-length APPL-YFP fusion proteins was sufficient to recruit endogenous RAB5 to enlarged APPL-associated membrane structures, although APPL1 was not necessary for RAB5 membrane targeting. Taken together, our findings suggest a role for APPL proteins as dynamic scaffolds that modulate RAB5-associated signaling endosomal membranes by their ability to undergo domain-mediated oligomerization, membrane targeting and phosphoinositide binding.     

A covalent linker allows for membrane targeting of an oxylipin biosynthetic complex

A naturally occurring bifunctional protein from Plexaura homomalla links sequential catalytic activities in an oxylipin biosynthetic pathway. The C-terminal lipoxygenase (LOX) portion of the molecule catalyzes the transformation of arachidonic acid (AA) to the corresponding 8 R-hydroperoxide, and the N-terminal allene oxide synthase (AOS) domain promotes the conversion of the hydroperoxide intermediate to the product allene oxide (AO). Small-angle X-ray scattering data indicate that in the absence of a covalent linkage the two catalytic domains that transform AA to AO associate to form a complex that recapitulates the structure of the bifunctional protein. The SAXS data also support a model for LOX and AOS domain orientation in the fusion protein inferred from a low-resolution crystal structure. However, results of membrane binding experiments indicate that covalent linkage of the domains is required for Ca (2+)-dependent membrane targeting of the sequential activities, despite the noncovalent domain association. Furthermore, membrane targeting is accompanied by a conformational change as monitored by specific proteolysis of the linker that joins the AOS and LOX domains. Our data are consistent with a model in which Ca (2+)-dependent membrane binding relieves the noncovalent interactions between the AOS and LOX domains and suggests that the C2-like domain of LOX mediates both protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions.     

Basic Residues in the Matrix Domain and Multimerization Target Murine Leukemia Virus Gag to the Virological Synapse

Murine leukemia virus (MLV) can efficiently spread in tissue cultures by polarizing assembly to virological synapses. The viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) establishes cell-cell contacts and subsequently recruits Gag by a process that depends on its cytoplasmic tail. MLV Gag is recruited to virological synapses through the matrix domain (MA) (J. Jin, F. Li, and W. Mothes, J. Virol. 85:7672–7682, 2011). However, how MA targets Gag to sites of cell-cell contact remains unknown. Here we report that basic residues within MA are critical for directing MLV Gag to virological synapses. Alternative membrane targeting domains (MTDs) containing multiple basic residues can efficiently substitute MA to direct polarized assembly. Similarly, mutations in the polybasic cluster of MA that disrupt Gag polarization can be rescued by N-terminal addition of MTDs containing basic residues. MTDs containing basic residues alone fail to be targeted to the virological synapse. Systematic deletion experiments reveal that domains within Gag known to mediate Gag multimerization are also required. Thus, our data predict the existence of a specific “acidic” interface at virological synapses that mediates the recruitment of MLV Gag via the basic cluster of MA and Gag multimerization.     

Pleckstrin homology domains and the cytoskeleton

Pleckstrin homology (PH) domains are 100-120 amino acid protein modules best known for their ability to bind phosphoinositides. All possess an identical core beta-sandwich fold and display marked electrostatic sidedness. The binding site for phosphoinositides lies in the center of the positively charged face. In some cases this binding site is well defined, allowing highly specific and strong ligand binding. In several of these cases the PH domains specifically recognize 3-phosphorylated phosphoinositides, allowing them to drive membrane recruitment in response to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation. Examples of these PH domain-containing proteins include certain Dbl family guanine nucleotide exchange factors, protein kinase B, PhdA, and pleckstrin-2. PH domain-mediated membrane recruitment of these proteins contributes to regulated actin assembly and cell polarization. Many other PH domain-containing cytoskeletal proteins, such as spectrin, have PH domains that bind weakly, and to all phosphoinositides. In these cases, the individual phosphoinositide interactions may not be sufficient for membrane association, but appear to require self-assembly of their host protein and/or cooperation with other anchoring motifs within the same molecule to drive membrane attachment.     

The yeast Epsin Ent1 is recruited to membranes through multiple independent interactions

In addition to its well known role in targeting proteins for proteasomal degradation, ubiquitin (Ub) is also involved in promoting internalization of cell surface proteins into the endocytic pathway. Moreover, putative Ub interaction motifs (UIMs) as well as Ub-associated (UBA) domains have been identified in key yeast endocytic proteins (the epsins Ent1 and Ent2, and the Eps15 homolog Ede1). In this study, we characterized the interaction of Ub with the Ede1 UBA domain and with the UIMs of Ent1. Our data suggest that the UIMs and the UBA are involved in binding these proteins to biological membranes. We also show that the Ent1 ENTH domain binds to phosphoinositides in vitro and that Ent1 NPF motifs interact with the EH domain-containing proteins Ede1 and Pan1. Our findings indicate that the ENTH domain interaction with membrane lipids cooperates with the binding of membrane-associated Ub moieties. These events may in turn favor the occurrence of other interactions, for instance EH-NPF recognition, thus stabilizing networks of low affinity binding partners at endocytic sites.     

Genome-wide analysis of membrane targeting by S. cerevisiae pleckstrin homology domains

Pleckstrin homology (PH) domains are small protein modules known for their ability to bind phosphoinositides and to drive membrane recruitment of their host proteins. We investigated phosphoinositide binding (in vitro and in vivo) and subcellular localization, and we modeled the electrostatic properties for all 33 PH domains encoded in the S. cerevisiae genome. Only one PH domain (from Num1p) binds phosphoinositides with high affinity and specificity. Six bind phosphoinositides with moderate affinity and little specificity and are membrane targeted in a phosphoinositide-dependent manner. Although all of the remaining 26 yeast PH domains bind phosphoinositides very weakly or not at all, three were nonetheless efficiently membrane targeted. Our proteome-wide analysis argues that membrane targeting is important for only approximately 30% of yeast PH domains and is defined by binding to both phosphoinositides and other targets. These findings have significant implications for understanding the function of proteins that contain this common domain.     

Targeting of Golgi-specific pleckstrin homology domains involves both PtdIns 4-kinase-dependent and -independent components

BACKGROUND: Phosphoinositides are required for the recruitment of many proteins to both the plasma membrane and the endosome; however, their role in protein targeting to other organelles is less clear. The pleckstrin homology (PH) domains of oxysterol binding protein (OSBP) and its relatives have been shown to bind to the Golgi apparatus in yeast and mammalian cells. Previous in vitro binding studies identified phosphatidylinositol (PtdIns) (4)P and PtdIns(4,5)P(2) as candidate ligands, but it is not known which is recognized in vivo and whether phosphoinositide specificity can account for Golgi-specific targeting. RESULTS: We have examined the distribution of GFP fusions to the PH domain of OSBP and to related PH domains in yeast strains carrying mutations in individual phosphoinositide kinases. We find that Golgi targeting requires the activity of the PtdIns 4-kinase Pik1p but not phosphorylation of PtdIns at the 3 or 5 positions and that a PH domain specific for PtdIns(4,5)P(2) is targeted exclusively to the plasma membrane. However, a mutant version of the OSBP PH domain that does not bind phosphoinositides in vitro still shows some targeting in vivo. This targeting is independent of Pik1p but dependent on the Golgi GTPase Arf1p. CONCLUSIONS: Phosphorylation of PtdIns at the 4 position but not conversion to PtdIns(4,5)P(2) contributes to recruitment of PH domains to the Golgi apparatus. However, potential phosphoinositide ligands for these PH domains are not restricted to the Golgi, and the OSBP PH domain also recognizes a second determinant that is ARF dependent, indicating that organelle specificity reflects a combinatorial interaction.     

Genomic analysis of secretion systems

Secretion of proteins into the extracellular environment is important to almost all bacteria, and in particular mediates interactions between pathogenic or symbiotic bacteria with their eukaryotic hosts. The accumulation of bacterial genome sequence data in the past few years has provided great insights into the distribution and function of these secretion systems. Three systems are responsible for secretion of proteins across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane: Sec, SRP and Tat. Many novel examples of systems for transport across the Gram-negative bacterial cell envelope have been discovered through genome sequencing and surveys, including many novel type III secretion systems and autotransporters. Similarly, genomic data mining has revealed many new potential secretion substrates and identified unsuspected domains in secretion-associated proteins. Interestingly, genomic analyses have also hinted at the existence of a dedicated protein secretion system in Gram-positive bacteria, targeting members of the WXG100/ESAT-6 family of proteins, and have revealed an unexpectedly wide distribution of sortase-driven protein-targeting systems.     

Accurate Prediction of Peptide Binding Sites on Protein Surfaces

Many important protein–protein interactions are mediated by the binding of a short peptide stretch in one protein to a large globular segment in another. Recent efforts have provided hundreds of examples of new peptides binding to proteins for which a three-dimensional structure is available (either known experimentally or readily modeled) but where no structure of the protein–peptide complex is known. To address this gap, we present an approach that can accurately predict peptide binding sites on protein surfaces. For peptides known to bind a particular protein, the method predicts binding sites with great accuracy, and the specificity of the approach means that it can also be used to predict whether or not a putative or predicted peptide partner will bind. We used known protein–peptide complexes to derive preferences, in the form of spatial position specific scoring matrices, which describe the binding-site environment in globular proteins for each type of amino acid in bound peptides. We then scan the surface of a putative binding protein for sites for each of the amino acids present in a peptide partner and search for combinations of high-scoring amino acid sites that satisfy constraints deduced from the peptide sequence. The method performed well in a benchmark and largely agreed with experimental data mapping binding sites for several recently discovered interactions mediated by peptides, including RG-rich proteins with SMN domains, Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 with TRADD domains, DBC1 with Sir2, and the Ago hook with Argonaute PIWI domain. The method, and associated statistics, is an excellent tool for predicting and studying binding sites for newly discovered peptides mediating critical events in biology.