miR-155在常见病原微生物感染中的研究进展

microRNAs(miRNAs)是一类长度为17~25 nt,进化上保守的非编码单链小RNA,成熟的miRNAs通过碱基互补配对的方式识别靶mRNA,并根据互补程度介导沉默复合体降解靶mRNA或者阻遏靶mRNA的翻译。miR-155是miRNAs家族中的典型代表,其不仅参与调控肿瘤细胞的增殖、分化和凋亡,而且在微生物感染过程及免疫炎症反应中也发挥着重要作用。将对miR-155在常见的几种病原微生物感染过程中发挥的作用做系统综述。     

微小RNA正调控基因表达的分子机制

microRNAs（miRNAs）是近年来发现的普遍存在于动植物体内的一类非编码RNA,传统观点认为,它们通过其种子序列定位于靶mRNA的3′非编码区,并发挥抑制靶mRNA翻译的作用.最新的研究揭示少数miRNAs也可以活化翻译,且这些现象的发生均与miRNA和翻译调控元件的相互作用有关.这些发现进一步扩展了对微小RNA功能的认识领域.     

miRNA与其靶mRNA的相互作用：绑定位点的质量与数量特征的整合计算分析

miRNAs通过完全或不完全的碱基互补绑定到信使RNA(mRNA)上,通过抑制翻译或者直接导致mRNA降解的方式来调节靶基因的表达．为了研究miRNAs在转录水平上面的调控作用,两种人类基因组中组织特异的miRNAs(miR-1和miR-124)被转染到HeLa细胞中,微阵列(microarray)分析转染前后细胞中各基因mRNA表达水平变化情况的结果表明：动物基因组中靶基因与miRNAs不完全的碱基互补也会导致mRNA的直接降解．通过分析实验得到的mRNA表达水平变化数据,发现这相同miRNA的不同靶基因mRNA表达水平的下调倍数有着明显的差别,推测这些靶基因mRNA序列本身存在某些影响其受调节程度的因素．为此,提取和分析这些靶基因mRNA的序列特征,通过对这些序列特征与mRNA表达水平下调数据进行统计相关分析,最终发现,miRNA靶基因受调节的程度与以下几个因素相关联：mRNA序列中miRNA靶位点的个数,靶位点与miRNA序列碱基互补的程度,以及绑定后形成二级结构的稳定程度(即最低自由能的大小)．在此基础上,初步建立起一个多因子作用下的miRNA 靶基因mRNA表达水平下调程度模型,分析表明：该模型在一定程度上可以反映了部分序列特征对于miRNA靶基因mRNA表达水平下调程度的影响．     

番茄中microRNAs研究进展

MicroRNAs(miRNAs)是一类特殊的、具有沉默作用的小分子RNA,它能够调控真核生物的基因表达.在植物中,miRNAs通过与靶mRNA互补配对、引起靶mRNA的降解或翻译阻遏的方式来起调控作用.作为一种研究果实成熟衰老的模式植物,近年来,番茄miRNAs的研究取得了很大进展.在番茄中,miRNAs几乎参与了所...     

microRNA调控血小板生成及功能

microRNA（miRNA）是一类长约22nt（19～23nt）在进化上非常保守的非编码RNA,其能够通过降解mRNA或抑制mRNA翻译来调控蛋白表达。研究证实miRNAs在包括胚胎干细胞分化、单核细胞和巨核细胞生成等血细胞形成过程中扮演重要的角色。而由巨核细胞生成的血小板内同样存在miRNAs,并且被证实参与到血小板活化和血小板生理病理状态改变等过程中。对miRNA调控血小板生成及功能的深入研究将有利于早期诊断治疗血液系统相关疾病。     

MicroRNA调控的分子影像研究进展

MicroRNAs(miRNAs)是一类长度约为22个核苷酸的RNA分子,它们通过与靶标mRNAs完全或不完全互补配对,进而导致靶标mRNA的降解或翻译的抑制.大量研究表明,它们在细胞增殖、分化、凋亡和肿瘤形成等广泛的生物学过程中都起着重要的作用.传统检测miRNAs表达的方法主要包括Northern杂交、实时定量PC...     

microRNA在心脏发育与疾病中功能研究进展

microRNAs(miRNAs)是一种基因组编码的小RNA,它们通过与目标mRNA分子的3'端非编码区域(3'UTR)互补配对导致mRNA分子稳定性和翻译受到抑制,在调节细胞增殖、凋亡、分化和肿瘤发生等多种生物学过程中起重要作用.心脏是人体的重要器官之一,其发育与疾病发生过程非常复杂,受到多种信号通路的调控.近期的研究表明,miRNAs在心脏的发生发育与疾病过程中都发挥着重要的作用,本文将对这方面的研究进展作一综述.     

microRNAs与血管系统发生及疾病的研究进展

microRNAs(miRNAs)是新近发现的一类长约19-25个核苷酸的内源性微小RNA,通过与靶mRNA的5'或3'的非编码区互补结合而使靶mRNA翻译抑制或降解,在细胞增殖、分化和凋亡,胰岛素分泌,脂肪代谢及肿瘤的发生发展等多种生物学过程中起重要作用.血管是一个复杂的封闭循环性系统,其发育和疾病的发生受到多基因的调控和多因素的影响.近期的研究表明,miRNAs与血管系统的发育及其疾病的发生具有密切的关系.     

植物microRNAs在植物发育和非生物胁迫响应中的作用

microRNAs(miRNAs)是一类内源的长度约为22个核苷酸的非编码小分子RNA,其通过对靶基因mRNA进行切割或翻译抑制调节mRNA的表达,在植物中起到重要的作用.主要介绍了植物miRNAs的特征、合成和作用机制,综述了miRNAs在植物生长发育和非生物胁迫响应中的作用.     

病毒miRNA:共生舞者?

MicroRNAs(miRNAs)是大约22个核苷酸长度的非编码RNA,存在于几乎所有多细胞生物中。miRNA基因编码的pri-miRNA在细胞核内经Drosha酶切割后运输到胞浆内,并由Dicer酶切割而成熟,与宿主蛋白结合形成RNA诱导的沉默复合体,通过与靶mRNA的3’端非翻译区不完全互补结合,诱导靶信使RNA(messenger RNA,mRNA)降解或翻译抑制,从而调节蛋白表达。miRNA不易突变,特别是5’端的2～7或2～8个核苷酸(seed region)与靶mRNA完全互补,非常保守。miRNA几乎在所有生物过程中起作用,如细胞分化、增殖、凋亡、新陈代谢以及调节免疫。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor