Urokinase-type plasminogen-activator and normal thyroid cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPA-R) focuses the proteolytic activity of its ligand, the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), on the cell surface, and can also act as an adhesion receptor for vitronectin (VTN). uPA increases uPA-R affinity for VTN and is also able to cleave its receptor. We have previously shown that uPA-R is involved in the adhesion of normal thyroid cells to VTN. In the present report, we have investigated the effect of uPA on normal thyroid cell adhesion to some extracellular matrix (ECM) components. We show that a short-term treatment with uPA does not change normal thyroid cell adhesion to fibronectin (FNT), collagen (CGN), laminin (LMN) and VTN. The prolongation of uPA treatment increases cell adhesion to VTN, and, less efficiently, to other ECM components. Since the short term uPA treatment causes a partial cleavage of uPA-R, that does not increase with time, the observed increase in cell adhesivity cannot be related to the cleavage of uPA-R. We show that the adhesion improvement after the long term uPA treatment is instead due to a strong increase of the cell-surface expression of the integrin beta3 and a moderate increase of the integrin alpha(v). Both alpha(v) beta3 and alpha(v) beta1 are integrinic receptors for VTN.     

Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 inhibits insulin signaling by competing with alphavbeta3 integrin for vitronectin binding.

Functional cooperation between integrins and growth factor receptors has been reported for several systems, one of which is the modulation of insulin signaling by alphavbeta3 integrin. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), competes with alphavbeta3 integrin for vitronectin (VN) binding. Here we report that PAI-1, in a VN-dependent manner, prevents the cooperation of alphavbeta3 integrin with insulin signaling in NIH3T3 fibroblasts, resulting in a decrease in insulin-induced protein kinase B (PKB) phosphorylation, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and cell migration. Insulin-induced HUVEC migration and angiotube formation was also enhanced in the presence of VN and this enhancement is inhibited by PAI-1. By using specific PAI-1 mutants with either VN binding or plasminogen activator (PA) inhibiting activities ablated, we have shown that the PAI-1-mediated interference with insulin signaling occurs through its direct interaction with VN, and not through its PA neutralizing activity. Moreover, using cells deficient for uPA receptor (uPAR) we have demonstrated that the inhibition of PAI-1 on insulin signaling is independent of uPAR-VN binding. These results constitute the first demonstration of the interaction of PAI-1 with the insulin response.     

Localization of urokinase type plasminogen activator to focal adhesions requires ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors

Previous studies have shown that the adhesion protein, vitronectin, directs the localization of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to areas of cell-substrate adhesion, where uPA is thought to regulate cell migration as well as pericellular proteolysis. In the present study, HT-1080 cell lines expressing either wild-type vitronectin or vitronectin containing a single amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain were used to assess whether ligation of the alphavbeta5 integrin was required for uPA localization to focal adhesions. The synthesis of wild-type vitronectin by HT-1080 cells adherent to either collagen or fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of both the alphavbeta5 integrin as well as uPA to focal adhesion structures. In contrast, cells synthesizing mutant vitronectin, containing the amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain, were unable to direct the redistribution of either alphavbeta5 or uPA to focal adhesions. Recombinant forms of wild-type and mutant vitronectin were prepared in a baculovirus system and compared for their ability to direct the redistribution of vitronectin integrin receptors as well as uPA on human skin fibroblasts. In the absence of vitronectin, fibroblast cells adherent to fibronectin assemble focal adhesions which contain the beta1 integrin but do not contain uPA. Addition of recombinant wild-type, but not mutant, vitronectin to fibroblasts adherent to fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5, and uPA into focal adhesions. However, when cells were plated directly onto antibodies directed against either the alphavbeta3 or alphavbeta5 integrins, uPA was not localized on the cell surface. These data indicate that ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors is necessary but not sufficient for the localization of uPA to areas of cell matrix adhesion, and suggest that vitronectin may promote cell migration by recruiting vitronectin integrin receptors and components of the plasminogen activator system to areas of cell matrix contact.     

The Receptor for Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator of a Human Keratinocyte Line (HaCaT)

It is assumed that plasmin participates in pericellular proteolysis in the epidermis. Plasmin is generated by keratinocyte-associated plasminogen activators from the proenzyme plasminogen; plasminogen activation can proceed at the keratinocyte surface. The resultant plasmin interferes with cell to matrix adhesion and does possibly contribute to keratinocyte migration during reepithelialization. Here we describe the receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA-R) in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT, which serves to direct plasminogen activation to the cell surface; we relate the receptor to the uPA-R previously described in human myclo-/monocytes. Binding of uPA to the receptor accelerated plasminogen activation by a factor of ≈10, compared to uPA in solution. Receptor-bound uPA was susceptible to inhibition by the plasminogen activator inhibitors 1 and 2. uPA and uPA-R antigen, as well as uPA activity, were localized to the leading front of expanding sheets of HaCaT cells. Exposure of HaCaT cells to plasminogen was followed by detachment of the cells. Detachment was prevented by an anti-catalytic anti-uPA antibody, by the plasmin-specific inhibitor aprotinin, and by the lysine analogue tranexamic acid, the latter of which prevents plasmin(ogen) binding to the cell surface. Our findings support the hypothesis that uPA-mediated plasminogen activation is characteristic of mobile rather than sessile keratinocytes. Moreover, the uPA-R seems to focalize plasminogen activation to the surface of cells at the site of keratinocyte migration.     

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator binding to its receptor stimulates tumor cell migration by enhancing integrin-mediated signal transduction.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) participate in matrix degradation and cell migration by focusing proteolysis and functioning as a signaling ligand/receptor complex. uPAR, anchored by a lipid moiety in the membrane, is thought to require a transmembrane adapter to transduce signals into the cytoplasm. To study uPAR signaling, we transfected the prostate carcinoma cell line LNCaP, which does not express endogenous uPA or uPAR, with a uPAR encoding cDNA, resulting in high-level surface expression. We studied migration of these cells on fibronectin, which is mediated by the integrin alpha5beta1. Ligation of uPAR with uPA or its amino-terminal fragment enhanced haptotactic migration to fibronectin. In cells on fibronectin, but not on poly-l-lysine, ligation of uPAR also resulted in tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins, including two proteins involved in integrin signaling, focal adhesion kinase and the crk-associated substrate p130(Cas). Furthermore, after uPAR ligation, uPAR was co-immunoprecipitated with beta1 integrins from the detergent-insoluble fraction of cell lysates. Thus, our data suggest that uPAR occupancy results in an interaction between uPAR and integrins and a potentiation of integrin-mediated signaling, which leads to enhanced cell migration.     

Plasminogen activator inhibitors regulate cell adhesion through a uPAR‐dependent mechanism

Binding of type‐1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI‐1) to cell surface urokinase (uPA) promotes inactivation and internalization of adhesion receptors (e.g., urokinase receptor (uPAR), integrins) and leads to cell detachment from a variety of extracellular matrices. In this report, we begin to examine the mechanism of this process. We show that neither specific antibodies to uPA, nor active site inhibitors of uPA, can detach the cells. Thus, cell detachment is not simply the result of the binding of macromolecules to uPA and/or of the inactivation of uPA. We further demonstrate that another uPA inhibitor, protease nexin‐1 (PN‐1), also stimulates cell detachment in a uPA/uPAR‐dependent manner. The binding of both inhibitors to uPA leads to the specific inactivation of the matrix‐engaged integrins and the subsequent detachment of these integrins from the underlying extracellular matrix (ECM). This inhibitor‐mediated inactivation of integrins requires direct interaction between uPAR and those integrins since cells attached to the ECM through integrins incapable of binding uPAR do not respond to the presence of either PAI‐1 of PN‐1. Although both inhibitors initiate the clearance of uPAR, only PAI‐1 triggers the internalization of integrins. However, cell detachment by PAI‐1 or PN‐1 does not depend on the endocytosis of these integrins since cell detachment was also observed when clearance of these integrins was blocked. Thus, PAI‐1 and PN‐1 induce cell detachment through two slightly different mechanisms that affect integrin metabolism. These differences may be important for distinct cellular processes that require controlled changes in the subcellular localization of these receptors. J. Cell. Physiol. 220: 655–663, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Regulation of human trophoblast migration and invasiveness

The human placenta is an invasive structure in which highly proliferative, migratory, and invasive extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cells migrate and invade the uterus and its vasculature. Using in vitro propagated normal first-trimester EVT cells and immortalized EVT cells, which share all of the phenotypic and functional characteristics of the normal EVT cells, it has been shown that migration/invasion of human EVT cells is stringently regulated by many growth factors, their binding proteins, extracellular matrix (ECM) components, and some adhesion molecules in an autocrine/paracrine manner at the fetal-maternal interface in human pregnancy. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), decorin (a proteoglycan in the ECM), and melanoma cell adhesion molecule (Mel-CAM) inhibit, and insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), IGF-binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1), and endothelin 1 (ET-1) stimulate EVT cell migration/invasion. Inhibition of EVT cell migration by TGF-beta has been suggested to be due to upregulation of integrins, which make the cells more adhesive to the ECM. Its antiinvasive action is due to an upregulation of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloprotease 1 (TIMP-1) and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) and a downregulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA). Molecular mechanisms of inhibition of migration/invasion of EVT cells by decorin and Mel-CAM remain to be identified. IGF-II action has been shown to be mediated by IGF type I receptors (IGF-RII) independently of IGF type I receptors (IGF-RI) and IGFBPs. This action of IGF-II appears to involve inhibitory G proteins and phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (ERK-1 and ERK-2)). IGFBP-1 stimulation of EVT cell migration appears to occur by binding its Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) domain to alpha5beta1 integrin, leading to phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and MAPK (ERK-1 and ERK-2). These studies may improve our understanding of diseases related to abnormal placentation, viz. hypoinvasiveness in preeclampsia and hyperinvasiveness in trophoblastic neoplasms.     

Mechanisms of talin-dependent integrin signaling and crosstalk

Cells undergo dynamic remodeling of the cytoskeleton during adhesion and migration on various extracellular matrix (ECM) substrates in response to physiological and pathological cues. The major mediators of such cellular responses are the heterodimeric adhesion receptors, the integrins. Extracellular or intracellular signals emanating from different signaling cascades cause inside-out signaling of integrins via talin, a cystokeletal protein that links integrins to the actin cytoskeleton. Various integrin subfamilies communicate with each other and growth factor receptors under diverse cellular contexts to facilitate or inhibit various integrin-mediated functions. Since talin is an essential mediator of integrin activation, much of the integrin crosstalk would therefore be influenced by talin. However, despite the existence of an extensive body of knowledge on the role of talin in integrin activation and as a stabilizer of ECM-actin linkage, information on its role in regulating inter-integrin communication is limited. This review will focus on the structure of talin, its regulation of integrin activation and discuss its potential role in integrin crosstalk. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Reciprocal influences between cell cytoskeleton and membrane channels, receptors and transporters. Guest Editor: Jean Claude Hervé.     

Effect of hypoxia on cellular adhesion to vitronectin and fibronectin

Cellular invasion of extracellular matrix (ECM) occurs during normal and pathological settings. For cells to invade, they must adhere to the underlying substratum, break down barrier molecules, and detach from the substratum prior to migrating through the ECM. We previously demonstrated that incubation under reduced oxygen levels increases the in vitro invasiveness of trophoblast and breast carcinoma cells, an effect linked to elevated expression of the cell surface receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR). This study examined the role of oxygen, integrins and the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system on the adhesion of trophoblast and breast carcinoma cells to the ECM molecules vitronectin and fibronectin. Compared to exposure to 20 and 5% oxygen, exposure to 1% oxygen decreased adhesion of these cells to vitronectin and fibronectin, an effect that was reversible by re-exposure to 20% oxygen. Incubation in 1% oxygen also resulted in reduced expression of surface alpha(5) integrin. Furthermore, adhesion to vitronectin and fibronectin was reduced by compounds that interfere with integrin function, such as EDTA, anti-integrin antibodies, or by antibodies that interfere with the binding of pro-uPA to uPAR, soluble uPAR, soluble vitronectin, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, as well as plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. These findings suggest an important role for oxygen in the regulation of cellular invasion, possibly in part through its effects on integrin and uPAR-mediated mechanisms of adhesion.     

The uPA receptor and the somatomedin B region of vitronectin direct the localization of uPA to focal adhesions in microvessel endothelial cells.

Vitronectin is a plasma protein which can deposit into the extracellular matrix where it supports integrin and uPA dependent cell migration. In earlier studies, we have shown that the plasma protein, vitronectin, stimulates focal adhesion remodeling by recruiting urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to focal adhesion sites [Wilcox-Adelman, S. A., Wilkins-Port, C. E., McKeown-Longo, P. J., 2000. Localization of urokinase-type plasminogen activator to focal adhesions requires ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors. Cell. Adhes. Commun.7, 477-490]. In the present study, we used a variety of vitronectin constructs to demonstrate that the localization of uPA to adhesion sites requires the binding of both vitronectin integrin receptors and the uPA receptor (uPAR) to vitronectin. A recombinant fragment of vitronectin containing the connecting sequence (VN(CS)) was able to support integrin-dependent adhesion, spreading and focal adhesion assembly by human microvessel endothelial cells. Cells adherent to this fragment were not able to localize uPA to focal adhesions. A second recombinant fragment containing both the amino-terminal SMB domain and the CS domain was able to restore the localization of uPA to adhesion sites. This fragment, which contains a uPAR binding site, also resulted in the localization of uPAR to adhesion sites. uPAR blocking antibodies as well as phospholipase C treatment of cells inhibited uPA localization to adhesion sites confirming a role for uPAR in this process. The SMB domain alone was unable to direct either uPAR or uPA to adhesion sites in the absence of the CS domain. Our results indicate that vitronectin-dependent localization of uPA to adhesion sites requires the sequential binding of vitronectin integrins and uPAR to vitronectin.     

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (CD87) is a ligand for integrins and mediates cell-cell interaction

Binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its receptor (uPAR/CD87) regulates cellular adhesion, migration, and tumor cell invasion. However, it is unclear how glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR, which lacks a transmembrane structure, mediates signal transduction. It has been proposed that uPAR forms cis-interactions with integrins as an associated protein and thereby transduces proliferative or migratory signals to cells upon binding of uPA. We provide evidence that soluble uPAR (suPAR) specifically binds to integrins alpha4beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha9beta1, and alphavbeta3 on Chinese hamster ovary cells in a cation-dependent manner. Anti-integrin and anti-uPAR antibodies effectively block binding of suPAR to these integrins. Binding of suPAR to alpha4beta1 and alphavbeta3 is blocked by known soluble ligands and by the integrin mutations that inhibit ligand binding. These results suggest that uPAR is an integrin ligand rather than, or in addition to, an integrin-associated protein. In addition, we demonstrate that glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR on the cell surface specifically binds to integrins on the apposing cells, suggesting that uPAR-integrin interaction may mediate cell-cell interaction (trans-interaction). These previously unrecognized uPAR-integrin interactions may allow uPAR to transduce signals through the engaged integrin without a hypothetical transmembrane adapter and may provide a potential therapeutic target for control of inflammation and cancer.     

Localization of Urokinase Type Plasminogen Activator to Focal Adhesions Requires Ligation of Vitronectin Integrin Receptors

Previous studies have shown that the adhesion protein, vitronectin, directs the localization of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to areas of cell-substrate adhesion, where uPA is thought to regulate cell migration as well as pericellular proteolysis. In the present study, HT-1080 cell lines expressing either wild-type vitronectin or vitronectin containing a single amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain were used to assess whether ligation of the α_vβT₅ integrin was required for uPA localization to focal adhesions. The synthesis of wild-type vitronectin by HT-1080 cells adherent to either collagen or fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of both the α_vβT₅ integrin as well as uPA to focal adhesion structures. In contrast, cells synthesizing mutant vitronectin, containing the amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain, were unable to direct the redistribution of either α_vβT₅ or uPA to focal adhesions. Recombinant forms of wild-type and mutant vitronectin were prepared in a baculovirus system and compared for their ability to direct the redistribution of vitronectin integrin receptors as well as uPA on human skin fibroblasts. In the absence of vitronectin, fibroblast cells adherent to fibronectin assemble focal adhesions which contain the βT₁ integrin but do not contain uPA. Addition of recombinant wild-type, but not mutant, vitronectin to fibroblasts adherent to fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of α_vβT₃, α_vβT₅, and uPA into focal adhesions. However, when cells were plated directly onto antibodies directed against either the α_vβT₃ or α_vβT₅ integrins, uPA was not localized on the cell surface. These data indicate that ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors is necessary but not sufficient for the localization of uPA to areas of cell-matrix adhesion, and suggest that vitronectin may promote cell migration by recruiting vitronectin integrin receptors and components of the plasminogen activator system to areas of cell matrix contact.     

Urokinase receptors promote beta1 integrin function through interactions with integrin alpha3beta1

The urokinase receptor (uPAR) is linked to cellular migration through its capacity to promote pericellular proteolysis, regulate integrin function, and mediate cell signaling in response to urokinase (uPA) binding. The mechanisms for these activities remain incompletely defined, although uPAR was recently identified as a cis-acting ligand for the beta2 integrin CD11b/CD18 (Mac-1). Here we show that a major beta1 integrin partner for uPAR/uPA signaling is alpha3. In uPAR-transfected 293 cells uPAR complexed (>90%) with alpha3beta1 and antibodies to alpha3 blocked uPAR-dependent vitronectin (Vn) adhesion. Soluble uPAR bound to recombinant alpha3beta1 in a uPA-dependent manner (K(d) < 20 nM) and binding was blocked by a 17-mer alpha3beta1 integrin peptide (alpha325) homologous to the CD11b uPAR-binding site. uPAR colocalized with alpha3beta1 in MDA-MB-231 cells and uPA (1 nM) enhanced spreading and focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation on fibronectin (Fn) or collagen type I (Col) in a pertussis toxin- and alpha325-sensitive manner. A critical role of alpha3beta1 in uPA signaling was verified by studies of epithelial cells from alpha3-deficient mice. Thus, uPAR preferentially complexes with alpha3beta1, promoting direct (Vn) and indirect (Fn, Col) pathways of cell adhesion, the latter a heterotrimeric G protein-dependent mechanism of signaling between alpha3beta1 and other beta1 integrins.     

Urinary-type plasminogen activator (uPA) expression and uPA receptor localization are regulated by alpha 3beta 1 integrin in oral keratinocytes

Expression of urinary-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) is correlated with matrix proteolysis, cell adhesion, motility, and invasion. To evaluate the functional link between adhesion and proteolysis in gingival keratinocytes (pp126), cells were treated with immobilized integrin antibodies to induce integrin clustering. Clustering of alpha(3) and beta(1) integrin subunits, but not alpha(2), alpha(5), alpha(6), or beta(4), enhanced uPA secretion. Bead-immobilized laminin-5 and collagen I, two major alpha(3)beta(1) ligands, also induced uPA expression. Coordinate regulation of the serpin plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 was also apparent; however, a net increase in uPA activity was predominant. alpha(3)beta(1) integrin clustering induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation, and both uPA induction and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation were blocked by the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase inhibitor PD98059. Integrin aggregation also promoted a dramatic redistribution of uPAR on the cell surface to sites of clustered alpha(3)beta(1) integrins. Co-immunoprecipitation of beta(1) integrin with uPAR provided further evidence that protein-protein interactions between uPAR and beta(1) integrin control uPAR distribution. As a functional consequence of uPA up-regulation and uPA-mediated plasminogen activation, the globular domain of the laminin-5 alpha(3) subunit, a major pp126 matrix protein, was proteolytically processed from a 190-kDa form to a 160-kDa species. Laminin-5 containing the 160-kDa alpha(3) subunit efficiently nucleates hemidesmosome formation and reduces cell motility. Together, these data suggest that multivalent aggregation of the alpha(3)beta(1) integrin regulates proteinase expression, matrix proteolysis, and subsequent cellular behavior.     

Critical role of integrin alpha 5 beta 1 in urokinase (uPA)/urokinase receptor (uPAR,CD87) signaling

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) induces cell adhesion and chemotactic movement. uPA signaling requires its binding to uPA receptor (uPAR/CD87), but how glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR mediates signaling is unclear. uPAR is a ligand for several integrins (e.g. alpha 5 beta 1) and supports cell-cell interaction by binding to integrins on apposing cells (in trans). We studied whether binding of uPAR to alpha 5 beta 1 in cis is involved in adhesion and migration of Chinese hamster ovary cells in response to immobilized uPA. This process was temperature-sensitive and required mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. Anti-uPAR antibody or depletion of uPAR blocked, whereas overexpression of uPAR enhanced, cell adhesion to uPA. Adhesion to uPA was also blocked by deletion of the growth factor domain (GFD) of uPA and by anti-GFD antibody, whereas neither the isolated uPA kringle nor serine protease domain supported adhesion directly. Interestingly, anti-alpha 5 antibody, RGD peptide, and function-blocking mutations in alpha 5 beta 1 blocked adhesion to uPA. uPA-induced cell migration also required GFD, uPAR, and alpha 5 beta 1, but alpha 5 beta 1 alone did not support uPA-induced adhesion and migration. Thus, binding of uPA causes uPAR to act as a ligand for alpha 5 beta 1 to induce cell adhesion, intracellular signaling, and cell migration. We demonstrated that uPA induced RGD-dependent binding of uPAR to alpha 5 beta 1 in solution. These results suggest that uPA-induced adhesion and migration of Chinese hamster ovary cells occurs as a consequence of (a) uPA binding to uPAR through GFD, (b) the subsequent binding of a uPA.uPAR complex to alpha 5 beta 1 via uPAR, and (c) signal transduction through alpha 5 beta 1.     

Integrin-mediated calcium signaling and regulation of cell adhesion by intracellular calcium

Integrins are ubiquitous trans-membrane adhesion molecules that mediate the interaction of cells with the extracellular matrix (ECM). Integrins link cells to the ECM by interacting with the cell cytoskeleton. In cases such as leukocyte binding, integrins mediate cell-cell interactions and cell-ECM interactions. Recent research indicates that integrins also function as signal transduction receptors, triggering a number of intracellular signaling pathways that regulate cell behavior and development. A number of integrins are known to stimulate changes in intracellular calcium levels, resulting in integrin activation. Although changes in intracellular calcium regulate a vast number of cellular functions, this review will discuss the stimulation of calcium signaling by integrins and the role of intracellular calcium in the regulation of integrin-mediated adhesion.     

Intracellular modifiers of integrin alpha 6p production in aggressive prostate and breast cancer cell lines

Cancer metastasis is a multi-step process in which tumor cells gain the ability to invade beyond the primary tumor and colonize distant sites. The mechanisms regulating the metastatic process confer changes to cell adhesion receptors including the integrin family of receptors. Our group previously discovered that the α6 integrin (ITGA6/CD49f) is post translationally modified by urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor, urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), to form the variant ITGA6p. This variant of ITGA6 is a cleaved form of the receptor that lacks the ligand-binding domain. Although it is established that the uPA/uPAR axis drives ITGA6 cleavage, the mechanisms regulating cleavage have not been defined. Intracellular integrin dependent “inside-out” signaling is a major regulator of integrin function and the uPA/uPAR axis. We hypothesized that intracellular signaling molecules play a role in formation of ITGA6p to promote cell migration during cancer metastasis. In order to test our hypothesis, DU145 and PC3B1 prostate cancer and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines were treated with small interfering RNA targeting actin and the intracellular signaling regulators focal adhesion kinase (FAK), integrin linked kinase (ILK), and paxillin. The results demonstrated that inhibition of actin, FAK, and ILK expression resulted in significantly increased uPAR expression and ITGA6p production. Inhibition of actin increased ITGA6p, although inhibition of paxillin did not affect ITGA6p formation. Taken together, these results suggest that FAK and ILK dependent “inside-out” signaling, and actin dynamics regulate extracellular production of ITGA6p and the aggressive phenotype.     

Regulation of axonal outgrowth and pathfinding by integrin-ECM interactions

Developing neurons use a combination of guidance cues to assemble a functional neural network. A variety of proteins immobilized within the extracellular matrix (ECM) provide specific binding sites for integrin receptors on neurons. Integrin receptors on growth cones associate with a number of cytosolic adaptor and signaling proteins that regulate cytoskeletal dynamics and cell adhesion. Recent evidence suggests that soluble growth factors and classic axon guidance cues may direct axon pathfinding by controlling integrin-based adhesion. Moreover, because classic axon guidance cues themselves are immobilized within the ECM and integrins modulate cellular responses to many axon guidance cues, interactions between activated receptors modulate cell signals and adhesion. Ultimately, growth cones control axon outgrowth and pathfinding behaviors by integrating distinct biochemical signals to promote the proper assembly of the nervous system. In this review, we discuss our current understanding how ECM proteins and their associated integrin receptors control neural network formation.     

Physical association of uPAR with the alphaV integrin on the surface of human NK cells

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) serves as a receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and plays a role in invasion and migration of certain immune cells, including NK cells. Although uPAR is anchored to the plasma membrane via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol lipid moiety, we have previously shown that uPAR crosslinking results in MAP kinase signaling and increased integrin expression on the surface of the human NK cell line, YT. We report, herein, that the binding of uPA to uPAR also activates the MAP kinase signaling cascade. Furthermore, we show the physical association between uPAR and integrins on YT cells using cocapping and fluorescence microscopy. These results suggest that signaling initiated by either uPAR binding to uPA or by uPAR clustering may depend on the physical association of uPAR with integrins, a process that may be a prerequisite for NK cell accumulation within established tumor metastases during adoptive therapy.