鸟类磁感受的生物物理机制研究进展

行为学实验表明,许多鸟类能够感受到地磁信息,并利用地磁信息完成迁徙或归巢。地磁场信息能提供可靠导航信息,磁力线可提供罗盘信息,而磁场强度和倾角可提供位置信息。文章介绍了鸟类磁感受机制的两种重要假说——基于磁铁矿的磁感受假说和化学磁感受假说,阐明了两种假说的理论原理及实验证据,对地磁信息传导神经通路与处理脑区做了评述,并展望了其发展方向。     

Magnetic orientation and navigation in marine turtles, lobsters, and molluscs: concepts and conundrums

The Earth's magnetic field provides a pervasive source of directionalinformation used by phylogenetically diverse marine animals.Behavioral experiments with sea turtles, spiny lobsters, andsea slugs have revealed that all have a magnetic compass sense,despite vast differences in the environment each inhabits andthe spatial scale over which each moves. For two of these animals,the Earth's field also serves as a source of positional information.Hatchling loggerhead sea turtles from Florida responded to themagnetic fields found in three widely separated regions of theAtlantic Ocean by swimming in directions that would, in eachcase, facilitate movement along the migratory route. Thus, foryoung loggerheads, regional magnetic fields function as navigationalmarkers and elicit changes in swimming direction at crucialgeographic boundaries. Older turtles, as well as spiny lobsters,apparently acquire a "magnetic map" that enables them to usemagnetic topography to determine their position relative tospecific goals. Relatively little is known about the neuralmechanisms that underlie magnetic orientation and navigation.A promising model system is the marine mollusc Tritonia diomedea,which possesses both a magnetic compass and a relatively simplenervous system. Six neurons in the brain of T. diomedea havebeen identified that respond to changes in magnetic fields.At least some of these appear to be ciliary motor neurons thatgenerate or modulate the final behavioral output of the orientationcircuitry. These findings represent an encouraging step towarda holistic understanding of the cells and circuitry that underliemagnetic orientation behavior in one model organism.     

Simulating geomagnetic bird navigation using novel high-resolution geomagnetic data

Birds rely on precise navigational mechanisms, especially for long-distance migrations. One debated mechanism is their use of the geomagnetic field. It is unclear if and how different species of birds are using intensity or inclination (or both) for navigation. Previous geomagnetic modelling research is based on static geomagnetic data despite a temporally and spatially varying geomagnetic field. Animals supposedly have a high sensitivity to those changes of the geomagnetic field. In order to understand how birds respond in real-time to its temporal variation, we need to use accurate geomagnetic information linked to the position of the bird through co-location in space and time.We developed a data-driven approach to simulate geomagnetic migratory strategies, using, for the first time, accurate contemporaneous geomagnetic data obtained from Swarm satellites of the European Space Agency. We created biased correlated random walk models which were based on both GPS data from greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons) during fall migration between north-west Russia and central Europe and contemporaneous satellite geomagnetic data. Different strategies of geomagnetic navigation associated with different geomagnetic values were translated into probability surfaces, built from geomagnetic data, and included into the random walk models. To evaluate which strategy was most likely, we compared the measured GPS trajectories to the simulated trajectories using different trajectory similarity measurements. We propose this as an approach to track many bird species for future comparative studies.We found that navigational strategies in these geese using magnetic intensity were closer to the observed data than those using inclination. This was the case in 80% of the best models and is an indication that it should be more beneficial for these geese to use intensity over inclination. Additionally, our results supported results from a previous study, that navigation based on taxis and compass mechanisms were more similar to the observed data than other mechanisms. We therefore suggest that these geese may use a combination of these strategies for navigation at a broad-scale. Overall, it seems likely that for successful navigation to the target location more than one mechanism is necessary; indicating a multifactorial navigation mechanism of these migratory geese in the study area. The satellite geomagnetic data are available at a higher temporal resolution and the use significantly improved the fit of the modelled simulations in comparison to the modelled geomagnetic data. Therefore, using annotated geomagnetic data could greatly improve the modelling of animal geomagnetic navigation in future research.     

Spontaneous preferences for magnetic compass direction in the American red-spotted newt, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Notophthalmus viridescens</Emphasis> (Salamandridae,Urodela)

In addition to other sensory modalities, migratory vertebrates are able to use the earths’ magnetic field for orientation and navigation. The magnetic cue may also serve as a reference for other orientation mechanisms. In this study, significant evidence is shown that, even in darkness, newts (Notophthalmus viridescens, Salamandridae) spontaneously align according to the natural or to the deviated earth’s magnetic field lines, thereby demonstrating a magnetic compass sensitivity. All newts preferred compass directions close to east or west or chose the E/W axially and hence sought to maintain a specific angle or axis relative to the magnetic field vector. Such an active alignment is considered an essential precondition for magnetic orientation. When the horizontal magnetic vector was experimentally compensated, animals became disoriented. We infer that the animals have either learned the preferred magnetic direction/axis individually or that these choices are innate and could even be seasonally different as in migrating birds. It is still an unanswered question as to how and where the physical and physiological mechanisms of magnetic transduction and reception take place. The visual system and other light-dependent (radical pairs) mechanisms alone are often claimed to be in function, but this must now be reconsidered given the results from animals when deprived of light. The results may therefore point to putative receptor mechanisms involving magnetite elements in specialized magneto-receptors.     

生物磁学在鸟类定向研究中的进展

地球上广泛存在的地磁场能够为导航提供可靠的信息,因此很多鸟类在迁徙和归巢过程中都使用地磁信息来保证航行方向的正确,在迁徙的鸟类中已经发现有18种是利用地磁罗盘进行定向和导航的。本文从鸟类使用的磁罗盘、航行地图以及磁感应机制等几方面阐述了目前在鸟类生物磁学方面的研究进展。     

Sea turtles, lobsters, and oceanic magnetic maps

Numerous marine animals can sense the Earth's magnetic field and use it as a cue in orientation and navigation. Two distinct types of information can potentially be extracted from the Earth's field. Directional or compass information enables animals to maintain a consistent heading in a particular direction such as north or south. In contrast, positional or map information can be used by animals to assess geographic location and, in some cases, to navigate to specific target areas. Marine animals exploit magnetic positional information in at least two different ways. For hatchling loggerhead sea turtles, regional magnetic fields function as open-sea navigational markers, eliciting changes in swimming direction at crucial points in the migratory route. Older sea turtles, as well as spiny lobsters, use magnetic information in a more complex way, exploiting it as a component of a classical navigational map, which permits an assessment of position relative to specific geographic destinations. These “magnetic maps” have not yet been fully characterized. They may be organized in several fundamentally different ways, some of which bear little resemblance to human maps, and they may also be used in conjunction with unconventional navigational strategies. Unraveling the nature of magnetic maps and exploring how they are used represents one of the most exciting frontiers of behavioral and sensory biology.     

The magnetite-based receptors in the beak of birds and their role in avian navigation

Iron-rich structures have been described in the beak of homing pigeons, chickens and several species of migratory birds and interpreted as magnetoreceptors. Here, we will briefly review findings associated with these receptors that throw light on their nature, their function and their role in avian navigation. Electrophysiological recordings from the ophthalmic nerve, behavioral studies and a ZENK-study indicate that the trigeminal system, the nerves innervating the beak, mediate information on magnetic changes, with the electrophysiological study suggesting that these are changes in intensity. Behavioral studies support the involvement of magnetite and the trigeminal system in magnetoreception, but clearly show that the inclination compass normally used by birds represents a separate system. However, if this compass is disrupted by certain light conditions, migrating birds show ‘fixed direction’ responses to the magnetic field, which originate in the receptors in the beak. Together, these findings point out that there are magnetite-based magnetoreceptors located in the upper beak close to the skin. Their natural function appears to be recording magnetic intensity and thus providing one component of the multi-factorial ‘navigational map’ of birds.     

Das Orientierungssystem der V?gel I. Kompa?mechanismen

Zusammenfassung V?gel stellen den Bezug zum Ziel indirekt über ein externes Referenzsystem her. Der Navigationsproze? besteht deshalb aus zwei Schritten: zun?chst wird die Richtung zum Ziel als Kompa?kurs festgelegt, dann wird dieser Kurs mit Hilfe eines Kompa?mechanismus aufgesucht. Das Magnetfeld der Erde und Himmelsfaktoren werden von den V?gel als Kompa? benutzt. In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden der Magnetkompa?, der Sonnenkompa? und der Sternkompa? der V?gel in ihrer Funktionsweise, ihrer Entstehung und ihrer biologischen Bedeutung vorgestellt. Der Magnetkompa? erwies sich als Inklinationskompa?, der nicht auf der Polarit?t, sondern auf der Neigung der Feldlinien im Raum beruht; er unterscheidet „polw?rts“ und „?quatorw?rts“ statt Nord und Süd. Er ist ein angeborener Mechanismus und wird beim Vogelzug und beim Heimfinden benutzt. Seine eigentliche Bedeutung liegt jedoch darin, da? er ein Referenzsystem bereitstellt, mit dessen Hilfe andere Orientierungsfaktoren zueinander in Beziehung gesetzt werden k?nnen. Der Sonnenkompa? beruht auf Erfahrung; Sonnenazimut, Tageszeit und Richtung werden durch Lernprozesse miteinander verknüpft, wobei der Magnetkompa? als Richtungsreferenzsystem dient. Sobald er verfügbar ist, wird der Sonnenkompa? bei der Orientierung im Heimbereich und beim Heimfinden bevorzugt benutzt; beim Vogelzug spielt er, wahrscheinlich wegen seiner Abh?ngigkeit von der geographischen Breite, kaum eine Rolle. Der Sternkompa? arbeitet ohne Beteiligung der Inneren Uhr; die V?gel leiten Richtungen aus den Konfigurationen der Sterne zueinander ab. Lernprozesse erstellen den Sternkompa? in der Phase vor dem ersten Zug; dabei fungiert die Himmelsrotation als Referenzsystem. Sp?ter, w?hrend des Zuges, übernimmt der Magnetkompa? diese Rolle. Die relative Bedeutung der verschiedenen Kompa?systeme wurde in Versuchen untersucht, bei denen Magnetfeld und Himmelsfaktoren einander widersprechende Richtungs-information gaben. Die erste Reaktion der V?gel war von Art zu Art verschieden; langfristig scheinen sich die V?gel jedoch nach dem Magnetkompa? zu richten. Dabei werden die Himmelsfaktoren umgeeicht, so da? magnetische Information und Himmelsinformation wieder im Einklang stehen. Der Magnetkompa? und die Himmelsfaktoren erg?nzen einander: der Magnetkompa? ersetzt Sonnen- und Sternkompa? bei bedecktem Himmel; die Himmelsfaktoren erleichtern den V?geln das Richtungseinhalten, zu dem der Magnetkompa? offenbar wenig geeignet ist. Magnetfeld und Himmelsfaktoren sollten deshalb als integrierte Komponenten eines multifaktoriellen Systems zur Richtungsorientierung betrachtet werden.

---

The orientation system of birds — I. Compass mechanisms

Summary Because of the large distances involved, birds establish contact with their goal indirectly via an external reference. Hence any navigation is a two-step process: in the first step, the direction to the goal is determined as a compass course; in the second step, this course is located with a compass. The geomagnetic field and celestial cues provide birds with compass information. The magnetic compass of birds, the sun compass the star compass and the interactions between the compass mechanisms are described in the present paper. Magnetic compass orientation was first demonstrated by testing night-migrating birds in experimentally altered magnetic fields: the birds changed their directional tendencies according to the deflected North direction. The avian magnetic compass proved to be an inclination compass: it does not use polarity; instead it is based on the axial course of the field lines and their inclination in space, distinguishing “poleward” and “equatorward” rather than North and South. Its functional range is limited to intensities around the local field strength, but this biological window is flexible and can be adjusted to other intensities. The magnetic compass is an innate mechanism that is widely used in bird migration and in homing. Its most important role, however, is that of a basic reference system for calibrating other kinds of orientation cues. Sun compass orientation is demonstrated by clock-shift experiments: Shifting the birds' internal clock causes them to misjudge the position of the sun, thus leading to typical deflections which indicate sun compass use. The analysis of the avian sun compass revealed that it is based only on sun azimuth and the internal clock; the sun's altitude is not involved. The role of the pattern of polarized light associated with the sun is unclear; only at sunset has it been shown to be an important cue for nocturnal migrants, being part of the sun compass. The sun compass is based on experience; sun azimuth, time of day and direction are combined by learning processes during a sensitive period, with the magnetic compass serving as directional reference. When established, the sun compass becomes the preferred compass mechanism for orientation tasks within the home region and homing: in migration, however, its role is minimal, probably because of the changes of the sun's arc with geographic latitude. The star compass was demonstrated in night-migrating birds by projecting the northern stars in different directions in a planetarium. The analysis of the mechanism revealed that the internal clock is not involved; birds derive directions from the spatial relationship of the star configurations. The star compass is also established by experience; the directional reference is first provided by celestial rotation, later, during migration, by the magnetic compass. The relative importance of the various compass mechanisms has been tested in experiments in which celestial and magnetic cues gave conflicting information. The first response of birds to conflicting cues differs considerably between species; after repeated exposures, however, the birds oriented according to magnetic North, indicating a long-term dominance of the magnetic compass. Later tests in the absence of magnetic information showed that celestial cues were not simply ignored, but recalibrated so that they were again in agreement with magnetic cues. The magnetic compass and celestial cues complement each other: the magnetic field ensures orientation under overcast sky; celestial cues facilitate maintaining directions, for which the magnetic compass appears to be ill suited. In view of this, the magnetic field and celestial cues should be regarded as integrated components of a multifactorial system for directional orientation.

     

Avian magnetic compass can be tuned to anomalously low magnetic intensities

The avian magnetic compass works in a fairly narrow functional window around the intensity of the local geomagnetic field, but adjusts to intensities outside this range when birds experience these new intensities for a certain time. In the past, the geomagnetic field has often been much weaker than at present. To find out whether birds can obtain directional information from a weak magnetic field, we studied spontaneous orientation preferences of migratory robins in a 4 µT field (i.e. a field of less than 10 per cent of the local intensity of 47 µT). Birds can adjust to this low intensity: they turned out to be disoriented under 4 µT after a pre-exposure time of 8 h to 4 µT, but were able to orient in this field after a total exposure time of 17 h. This demonstrates a considerable plasticity of the avian magnetic compass. Orientation in the 4 µT field was not affected by local anaesthesia of the upper beak, but was disrupted by a radiofrequency magnetic field of 1.315 MHz, 480 nT, suggesting that a radical-pair mechanism still provides the directional information in the low magnetic field. This is in agreement with the idea that the avian magnetic compass may have developed already in the Mesozoic in the common ancestor of modern birds.     

Orientation and navigation in Amphibia

Aquatic and terrestrial amphibians integrate acoustic, magnetic, mechanical, olfactory and visual directional information into a redundant-multisensory orientation system. The sensory information is processed to accomplish homing following active or passive displacement by either path integration, beaconing, pilotage, compass orientation or true navigation. There is evidence for two independent compass systems, a time-compensated compass based on celestial cues and a light-dependent magnetic inclination compass. Beaconing along acoustic or olfactory gradients emanating from the home site, as well as pilotage along fixed visual landmarks also form an important part in the behaviour of many species. True navigation has been shown in only one species, the aquatic salamander Notophthalmus viridescens. Evidence on the nature of the navigational map obtained so far is compatible with the magnetic map hypothesis.     

Role of exchange and dipolar interactions in the radical pair model of the avian magnetic compass

It is not yet understood how migratory birds sense the Earth's magnetic field as a source of compass information. One suggestion is that the magnetoreceptor involves a photochemical reaction whose product yields are sensitive to external magnetic fields. Specifically, a flavin-tryptophan radical pair is supposedly formed by photoinduced sequential electron transfer along a chain of three tryptophan residues in a cryptochrome flavoprotein immobilized in the retina. The electron Zeeman interaction with the Earth's magnetic field (∼50 μT), modulated by anisotropic magnetic interactions within the radicals, causes the product yields to depend on the orientation of the receptor. According to well-established theory, the radicals would need to be separated by >3.5 nm in order that interradical spin-spin interactions are weak enough to permit a ∼50 μT field to have a significant effect. Using quantum mechanical simulations, it is shown here that substantial changes in product yields can nevertheless be expected at the much smaller separation of 2.0 ± 0.2 nm where the effects of exchange and dipolar interactions partially cancel. The terminal flavin-tryptophan radical pair in cryptochrome has a separation of ∼1.9 nm and is thus ideally placed to act as a magnetoreceptor for the compass mechanism.     

Bats use magnetite to detect the earth's magnetic field

While the role of magnetic cues for compass orientation has been confirmed in numerous animals, the mechanism of detection is still debated. Two hypotheses have been proposed, one based on a light dependent mechanism, apparently used by birds and another based on a "compass organelle" containing the iron oxide particles magnetite (Fe(3)O(4)). Bats have recently been shown to use magnetic cues for compass orientation but the method by which they detect the Earth's magnetic field remains unknown. Here we use the classic "Kalmijn-Blakemore" pulse re-magnetization experiment, whereby the polarity of cellular magnetite is reversed. The results demonstrate that the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus uses single domain magnetite to detect the Earths magnetic field and the response indicates a polarity based receptor. Polarity detection is a prerequisite for the use of magnetite as a compass and suggests that big brown bats use magnetite to detect the magnetic field as a compass. Our results indicate the possibility that sensory cells in bats contain freely rotating magnetite particles, which appears not to be the case in birds. It is crucial that the ultrastructure of the magnetite containing magnetoreceptors is described for our understanding of magnetoreception in animals.     

Two different types of light-dependent responses to magnetic fields in birds

A model of magnetoreception proposes that the avian magnetic compass is based on a radical pair mechanism, with photon absorption leading to the formation of radical pairs. Analyzing the predicted light dependency by testing migratory birds under monochromatic lights, we found that the responses of birds change with increasing intensity. The analysis of the orientation of European robins under 502 nm turquoise light revealed two types of responses depending on light intensity: under a quantal flux of 8.10(15) quanta m(-2) s(-1), the birds showed normal migratory orientation in spring as well as in autumn, relying on their inclination compass. Under brighter light of 54.10(15) quanta m(-2) s(-1), however, they showed a "fixed" tendency toward north that did not undergo the seasonal change and proved to be based on magnetic polarity, not involving the inclination compass. When birds were exposed to a weak oscillating field, which specifically interferes with radical pair processes, the inclination compass response was disrupted, whereas the response to magnetic polarity remained unaffected. These findings indicate that the normal inclination compass used for migratory orientation is based on a radical-pair mechanism, whereas the fixed direction represents a novel type of light-dependent orientation based on a mechanism of a different nature.     

Kompass im Kopf

Ant compass – how desert ants learn to navigate Successful spatial orientation is a daily challenge for many animals. Cataglyphis desert ants are famous for their navigational performances. They return to the nest after extensive foraging trips without any problems. How do ants take their navigational systems into operation? After conducting different tasks in the dark nest for several weeks, they become foragers under bright sun light. This transition requires both a drastic switch in behavior and neuronal changes in the brain. Experienced foragers mainly rely on visual cues. They use a celestial compass and landmark panoramas. For that reason, naïve ants perform stereotype learning walks to calibrate their compass systems and acquire information about the nest's surroundings. During their learning walks, the ants frequently look back to the nest entrance to learn the homing direction. For aligning their gazes, they use the earth's magnetic field as a compass reference. This magnetic compass in Cataglyphis ants was previously unknown.     

Magnetic Compass of Birds Is Based on a Molecule with Optimal Directional Sensitivity

The avian magnetic compass has been well characterized in behavioral tests: it is an “inclination compass” based on the inclination of the field lines rather than on the polarity, and its operation requires short-wavelength light. The “radical pair” model suggests that these properties reflect the use of specialized photopigments in the primary process of magnetoreception; it has recently been supported by experimental evidence indicating a role of magnetically sensitive radical-pair processes in the avian magnetic compass. In a multidisciplinary approach subjecting migratory birds to oscillating fields and using their orientation responses as a criterion for unhindered magnetoreception, we identify key features of the underlying receptor molecules. Our observation of resonance effects at specific frequencies, combined with new theoretical considerations and calculations, indicate that birds use a radical pair with special properties that is optimally designed as a receptor in a biological compass. This radical pair design might be realized by cryptochrome photoreceptors if paired with molecular oxygen as a reaction partner.     

Bats respond to polarity of a magnetic field

Bats have been shown to use information from the Earth's magnetic field during orientation. However, the mechanism underlying this ability remains unknown. In this study we investigated whether bats possess a polarity- or inclination-based compass that could be used in orientation. We monitored the hanging position of adult Nyctalus plancyi in the laboratory in the presence of an induced magnetic field of twice Earth-strength. When under the influence of a normally aligned induced field the bats showed a significant preference for hanging at the northern end of their roosting basket. When the vertical component of the field was reversed, the bats remained at the northern end of the basket. However, when the horizontal component of the field was reversed, the bats changed their positions and hung at the southern end of the basket. Based on these results, we conclude that N. plancyi, unlike all other non-mammalian vertebrates tested to date, uses a polarity-based compass during orientation in the roost, and that the same compass is also likely to underlie bats' long-distance navigation abilities.     

Avian orientation at steep angles of inclination: experiments with migratory white-crowned sparrows at the magnetic North Pole

The Earth's magnetic field and celestial cues provide animals with compass information during migration. Inherited magnetic compass courses are selected based on the angle of inclination, making it difficult to orient in the near vertical fields found at high geomagnetic latitudes. Orientation cage experiments were performed at different sites in high Arctic Canada with adult and young white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii) in order to investigate birds' ability to use the Earth's magnetic field and celestial cues for orientation in naturally very steep magnetic fields at and close to the magnetic North Pole. Experiments were performed during the natural period of migration at night in the local geomagnetic field under natural clear skies and under simulated total overcast conditions. The experimental birds failed to select a meaningful magnetic compass course under overcast conditions at the magnetic North Pole, but could do so in geomagnetic fields deviating less than 3 degrees from the vertical. Migratory orientation was successful at all sites when celestial cues were available.     

Light-dependent orientation responses in animals can be explained by a model of compass cue integration

The magnetic compass sense of animals is currently thought to be based on light-dependent processes like the proposed radical pair mechanism. In accordance, many animals show orientation responses that depend on light. However, the orientation responses depend on the wavelength and irradiance of monochromatic light in rather complex ways that cannot be explained directly by the radical pair mechanism. Here, a radically different model is presented that can explain a vast majority of the complex observed light-dependent responses. The model put forward an integration process consisting of simple lateral inhibition between a normal functioning, light-independent magnetic compass (e.g. magnetite based) and a vision based skylight color gradient compass that misperceives compass cues in monochromatic light. Integration of the misperceived color compass cue and the normal magnetic compass not only explains most of the categorically different light-dependent orientation responses, but also shows a surprisingly good fit to how well the animals are oriented (r-values) under light of different wavelength and irradiance. The model parsimoniously suggests the existence of a single magnetic sense in birds (probably based on magnetic crystals).     

Avian navigation: from historical to modern concepts

Studies on avian navigation began at the end of the 19th century with testing various hypotheses, followed by large-scale displacement experiments to assess the capacity of the birds' navigational abilities. In the 1950s, the first theoretical concepts were published. Kramer proposed his ‘Map-and-Compass’ model, assuming that birds establish the direction to a distant goal with the help of an external reference, a compass. The model describes homing as a two-step process, with the first step determining the direction to the goal as a compass course and the second step locating this course with the help of a compass. This model was widely accepted when numerous experiments with clock-shifted pigeons demonstrated the use of the sun compass, and thus a general involvement of compass orientation, in homing. The ‘map’ step is assumed to use local site-specific information, which led to the idea of a ‘grid map’ based on environmental gradients. Kramer's model still forms the basis of our present concept on avian homing, yet route integration with the help of an external reference provides an alternative strategy to determine the home course, and the magnetic compass is a second compass mechanism available to birds. These mechanisms are interrelated by ontogenetic learning processes. A two-step process, with the first step providing the compass course and the second step locating this course with the help of a compass, appears to be a common feature of avian navigation tasks, yet the origin of the compass courses differs between tasks according to their nature, with courses acquired by experience for flights within the home range, courses based on navigational processes for returning home, and courses derived from genetically coded information in first-time migrants. Compass orientation thus forms the backbone of the avian navigational system. Copyright 2003 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.      

Magnetic orientation and magnetoreception in birds and other animals

Animals use the geomagnetic field in many ways: the magnetic vector provides a compass; magnetic intensity and/or inclination play a role as a component of the navigational map, and magnetic conditions of certain regions act as sign posts or triggers, eliciting specific responses. A magnetic compass is widespread among animals, magnetic navigation is indicated e.g. in birds, marine turtles and spiny lobsters and the use of magnetic sign posts has been described for birds and marine turtles. For magnetoreception, two hypotheses are currently discussed, one proposing a chemical compass based on a radical pair mechanism, the other postulating processes involving magnetite particles. The available evidence suggests that birds use both mechanisms, with the radical pair mechanism in the right eye providing directional information and a magnetite-based mechanism in the upper beak providing information on position as component of the map. Behavioral data from other animals indicate a light-dependent compass probably based on a radical pair mechanism in amphibians and a possibly magnetite-based mechanism in mammals. Histological and electrophysiological data suggest a magnetite-based mechanism in the nasal cavities of salmonid fish. Little is known about the parts of the brain where the respective information is processed.