Quantitation of the accumulation of histone messenger RNA during oogenesis in Xenopus leavis

The accumulation of messenger RNA coding for histone H3 in oogenesis of Xenopus laevis was studied by quantitative hybridization techniques, using a cloned genomic DNA fragment as a probe. This probe was isolated from cloned Xenopus histone DNA and contains most of the H3 coding sequences. Histone H3 mRNA accumulation was found to be completed before the maximum lampbrush stage. Hybridization of RNA blots with DNA probes containing genes for histones H2A, H2B, and H4 suggests the same accumulation pattern for the mRNAs coding for these histones as for histone H3 mRNA. The amount of H3 mRNA in the mature oocyte was established to be 130 ± 68 pg, i.e., about 5 × 10⁸ copies.     

Potent activity against K562 cells by polyamide–seco-CBI conjugates targeting histone H4 genes

We designed and synthesized conjugates between pyrrole–imidazole polyamides and seco-CBI that alkylate within the coding regions of the histone H4 genes. DNA alkylating activity on the histone H4 fragment and cellular effects against K562 chronic myelogenous leukemia cells were investigated. One of the conjugates, 5-CBI, showed strong DNA alkylation activity and good sequence specificity on a histone H4 gene fragment. K562 cells treated with 5-CBI down-regulated the histone H4 gene and induced apoptosis efficiently. Global gene expression data revealed that a number of histone H4 genes were down-regulated by 5-CBI treatment. These results suggest that sequence-specific DNA alkylating agents may have the potential of targeting specific genes for cancer chemotherapy.     

Histone genes of the sea urchin (S. purpuratus) cloned in E. coli: Order,polarity, and strandedness of the five histone-coding and spacer regions

Sea urchin (S. purpuratus) histone DNA of constructed plasmid chimeras cloned in E. coli was cleaved with the restriction endonucleases Eco RI, Hind III, Sal I, Bam I, and Hha I. The resulting fragments were ordered and isolated directly from agarose gels or cloned into other plasmids. Each fragment hybridized to one or another of the five histone mRNAs and elucidated the order of the histone genes in each of the cloned fragments. Some DNA did not hybridize to histone mRNAs and was identified as spacer DNA located between coding regions.Total sea urchin DNA was cleaved with restriction endonucleases, fractionated on agarose gels, and hybridized to histone mRNAs or histone DNA. The results revealed the order of the five histone genes in the histone gene repeat unit and demonstrate that the histone spacer DNAs have little sequence homology to other genes. Exonuclease III digestion of specific linear chimeric histone DNA plasmids followed by hybridization with mRNAs demonstrated the existence of all five histone genes on one strand of DNA and the 5′-3′ polarity of that strand. These results, in conjunction with the data of Wu et al. (1976), allow us to construct a map of coding and spacer sequences in the transcribed strand of the S. purpuratus histone gene repeat unit:

     

A series of repetitive DNA sequences are associated with human core and H1 histone genes

Summary Repetitive DNA sequences, derived from the human β-globin gene cluster, were mapped within a series of human genomic DNA segments containing core (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4) and H1 histone genes. Cloned recombinant λCH4A phage with human histone gene inserts were analyzed by Southern blot analysis using the following³²P-labeled (nick translated) repetitive sequences as probes:Alu I,Kpn I and LTR-like. A cloned DNA designated RS002-5′C6 containing (i)a (TG)₁₆ simple repeat, (ii) an (ATTTT)n repeat and (iii)a 52 base pair alternating purine and pyrimidine sequence was also used as a radiolabelled hybridization probe. Analysis of 12 recombinant phage, containing 6 arrangements of core histone genes, indicated the presence ofAlu I,Kpn and RS002-5′C6 repetitive sequences. In contrast, analysis of 4 human genomic DNA segments, containing both core and H1 histone genes, indicated the presence of onlyAlu I family sequences. LTR-like sequences were not detected in association with any of the core or H1 histone genes examined. These results suggest that human histone and β-globin genes share certain aspects of sequence organization in flanking regions despite marked differences in their overall structure and pattern of expression.     

Characterization of the H1.5 gene completes the set of human H1 subtype genes

The H1 histone family in mammals contains at least seven subtypes. In the past we have isolated six of the seven genes encoding these isoforms. To complete the set of the human H1 histone genes, we have designed two PCR primers deduced from a partially published sequence of the remaining histone H1 gene [Carozzi et al. (1984)Science 224, 1115–1118] and from a consensus sequence which we have derived from the conserved region of human histone H1 genes. Using these primers we have amplified a 417-bp DNA fragment from total human DNA. This fragment was used for screening a human phage genomic library. Two overlapping clones were isolated. The region contains a set of 5 genes representing each of the five histone classes. In continuation of our numbering of human H1 genes, we have named this H1 gene H1.5. This gene encodes a protein almost identical to the previously published protein sequence designated H1a [Ohe et al. (1986)J. Biochem. 100, 359–368]; since the changes are in a region of some uncertainty of the peptide sequencing, we conclude that the newly isolated gene codes for the H1a protein. The structures of the flanking regions of the genes except the H2B gene are typical for histone genes. They include: (1) a CCAAT element in the promotor region, (2) a TATA box and (3) a palindromic termination element. The H2B sequence shows no typical regulatory elements and no complete ORF, therefore we consider it as a pseudogene. The expression of the H1.5 gene was examined in several cell lines.     

Yeast H3 and H4 histone messenger RNAs are transcribed from two non-allelic gene sets

The genes coding for the H3 and H4 histones of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been isolated by recombinant DNA cloning. The genes were detected in a bacteriophage lambda library of the yeast genome by hybridization with plasmids containing the cloned Psammechinus miliaris sea urchin histone genes (pCH7) and the cloned Drosophila histone genes (cDM500). Two non-allelic sets of the H3 and H4 genes have been isolated. Each set consists of one H3 gene and one H4 gene arranged as a divergently transcribed pair separated by an intergene spacer DNA. The histone genes were located on the cloned yeast fragments by S1 nuclease mapping, as was a gene (SMT1) of unknown function that does not code for a histone but is closely linked to one of the histone sets. Sequence homology between the two non-allelic sets is confined to the coding regions of the respective genes while the flanking DNA and intergene spacer DNA are extensively divergent. Cellular RNA homologous to the histone genes, including transcribed non-coding sequences unique to each of the four genes, was detected by S1 mapping, thus demonstrating that all four genes are transcribed in vegetative cells.     

Histone genes in macronuclear DNA of the ciliate Stylonychia mytilus

DNA in the macronucleus of Stylonychia mytilus exists as discrete gene-sized fragments which are derived from micronuclear DNA through a series of well-defined developmental events. It has been proposed that each of the DNA fragments might represent a gene and its controlling elements. We have investigated this possibility using genes which code for the five histone proteins. Macronuclear DNA fragments were fractionated according to size by agarose gel electrophoresis, the fragments transferred to nitrocellulose filters using the technique of Southern, and the filter-bound DNA hybridized with labeled cloned histone genes of the sea urchin, Psammechinus miliaris. Results indicate, first, that sequences homologous to the five individual histone gene probes are present in discrete macronuclear fragments which appear as bands in the gel hybridization assay. Secondly, for each of the five individual histone gene probes the homologous DNA fragments are several in number, ranging in size from 7.6 Kb (Kilo base pairs) to 0.73 Kb. For example, the largest of six detected fragments hybridizing to the H3 gene probe contains approximately 10 times the amount of DNA required to code for a Stylonychia H3 histone. The smallest detected fragment hybridizing to the H3 probe contains enough DNA to code for approximately two copies of the histone. Finally, in general, no two histone gene probes hybridized to the same macronuclear DNA fragment. This result indicates that genes coding for the five histones in Stylonychia are not located together on the same macronuclear DNA fragments and implies that the five functionally related genes would not be transcribed together as a polycistronic unit.     

The organization of the histone genes in the genome of Xenopus laevis.

We have studied the organization of the histone genes in the DNA from several individuals of Xenopus laevis. For that purpose, Southern blots of genomic DNA, that was digested with several restriction enzymes, were hybridized with radioactively labeled DNA fragments from clone X1-hi-1 (14), containing genes for Xenopus histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. In the DNA of all animals that were screened we found a major repeating unit of 14 kilobasepairs, which contains genes for histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 (H1 not tested) and is represented up to 30 times in the genome. The order of the genes in this major repeating unit is H4 - H3 - H2A - H2B. This order is different from that in the histone DNA of clone X1-hi-1, i.e. H3 - H4 - H2A - H2B. In addition to the genes in the major repeating unit, histone genes are present in unique restriction fragments in numbers that vary from one animal to another. The restriction patterns for the histone genes in these unique fragments were found to be different for all eight Xenopus individuals that were screened. The cloned Xenopus histone gene fragment X1-hi-1 represents such a unique fragment and is not present in the DNA of each single individual. The total number of genes coding for each of the nucleosomal histones is 45-50 per haploid genome.     

Non-germ Line Restoration of Genomic Imprinting for a Small Subset of Imprinted Genes in Ubiquitin-like PHD and RING Finger Domain-Containing 1 (Uhrf1) Null Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

The underlying mechanism for the establishment and maintenance of differential DNA methylation in imprinted genes is largely unknown. Previous studies using Dnmt1 knock-out embryonic stem (ES) cells demonstrated that, although re-expression of DNMT1 restored DNA methylation in the non-imprinted regions, the methylation patterns of imprinted genes could be restored only through germ line passage. Knock-out of Uhrf1, an accessory factor essential for DNMT1-mediated DNA methylation, in mouse ES cells also led to impaired global DNA methylation and loss of genomic imprinting. Here, we demonstrate that, although re-expression of UHRF1 in Uhrf1^−/− ES cells restored DNA methylation for the bulk genome but not for most of the imprinted genes, it did rescue DNA methylation for the imprinted H19, Nnat, and Dlk1 genes. Analysis of histone modifications at the differential methylated regions of the imprinted genes by ChIP assays revealed that for the imprinted genes whose DNA methylation could be restored upon re-expression of UHRF1, the active histone markers (especially H3K4me3) were maintained at considerably low levels, and low levels were maintained even in Uhrf1^−/− ES cells. In contrast, for the imprinted genes whose DNA methylation could not be restored upon UHRF1 re-expression, the active histone markers (especially H3K4me3) were relatively high and became even higher in Uhrf1^−/− ES cells. Our study thus supports a role for histone modifications in determining the establishment of imprinting-related DNA methylation and demonstrates that mouse ES cells can be a valuable model for mechanistic study of the establishment and maintenance of differential DNA methylation in imprinted genes.     

Nonallelic histone gene clusters of individual sea urchins (Lytechinus pictus): Polarity and gene organization

We have analyzed the histone genes from the sea urchin Lytechinus pictus. Examination of native DNA from individuals reveals four major Eco RI restriction endonuclease histone gene DNA fragments which have been labeled A (6.0 kb), B (4.1 kb), C (3.1 kb) and D (1.2 kb). The fragments A, B and C have been cloned into E. coli plasmids (pLpA, pLpB and pLpC). These histone gene fragments display length and sequence heterogeneity in different individuals. The plasmid pLpA contains the coding regions for H1, H4, H2B and H3 histones, and we determined that the DNA fragment D is tandem to A in native DNA and that it contains the H2A gene. The plasmids pLpB and pLpC contain the histone genes H2A-H1-H4 and H2B-H3, respectively, and together contain the sequences for the five major histones. Restriction analysis of native L. pictus DNA reveals that B and C are tandem to each other but not intermingled with the A-D-type repeat units, and are thus in separate clusters with a repeat length of 7.2 kb. Since the two cluster types do not segregate, they are not alleles. Hybridization of histone mRNA to exonuclease III-digested linear DNA demonstrated an identical polarity of the histone genes in the A-D- and B-C-type repeat units. This result revealed that the L. pictus histone genes have a polarity which is the same as other sea urchin histone genes examined to date—that is, 3′ H1-H4-H2B-H3-H2A 5′. Restriction endonuclease cleavage patterns of the cloned segments indicate that considerable sequence heterogeneity exists between the two types of histone gene repeat units.     

An unusual evolutionary behaviour of a sea urchin histone gene cluster

DNA sequences of cloned histone coding sequences and spacers of sea urchin species that diverged long ago in evolution were compared. The highly repeated H4 and H3 genes active during early embryogenesis had evolved (in their silent sites) at a rate (0.5-0.6% base changes/Myr) similar to single-copy protein-coding genes and nearly as fast as spacer DNA (0.7% base changes/Myr) and unique DNA. Thus, evolution in the major histone genes conforms to a universal evolutionary clock based on the rate of base sequence change. By contrast, the H4 and H3 coding sequences and a non-transcribed spacer of the DNA clone h19 of Psammechinus miliaris show an exceptionally low rate of sequence evolution only 1/100 to 1/200 that predicted from the clock hypothesis. According to the classical model of gene inheritance, the h19 DNA sequences in the Psammechinus genome require unusual conservation mechanisms by selection at the level of the gene and spacer sequences. An alternative explanation could be recent horizontal gene transfer of a histone gene cluster from the very distantly related Strongylocentrotus dröbachiensis to the P. miliaris genome.     

tRNA2Lys gene clusters in Drosophila

We have isolated segments of Drosophila melanogaster DNA that contain two clusters of tRNA₂^Lys genes. In one segment, pPW511, there is a cluster of three of these genes surrounded by other tRNA genes. Two other segments, pPW516 and pPW541. share a 3 × 10³ base-pair region that has a cluster of four tRNA₂^Lys genes. This cluster is flanked by 20 × 10³ base-pairs of DNA that does not appear to have other tRNA genes. The tRNA genes in both clusters are irregularly spaced and are intermingled with moderately repetitive DNA. Each cluster is present once or perhaps twice in the haploid genome and has the same arrangement of restriction endonuclease sites in the genomic DNA as in the isolated, cloned DNA. In situ hybridization to polytene chromosomes localized the pPW511 cluster to the 42A region and the pPW516/541 cluster to the 42E region. Another region, 50B, also contains tRNA₂^Lys genes. In sum, these cloned tRNA₂^Lys genes account for most of this gene family and are irregularly spaced in two clusters.     

The structural organization and DNA sequence of a wheat histone H4 gene.

Some wheat histone H4 genes have been cloned from a Charon 4 wheat genomic DNA library using sea urchin histone H4 DNA as a probe. DNA sequence analysis of a cloned gene showed that the deduced amino acid sequence of wheat histone H4 protein was identical to that of pea. The 5' end of wheat histone H4 mRNA was mapped on the cloned gene by the S1-procedure. Southern blotting analysis of the genomic DNA indicated that histone H4 genes were reiterated 100 to 125 times per hexaploid wheat genome.     

Sequence organization of a cloned tDNA1met fragment from xenopus laevis

3.18 kb fragments of X. laevis DNA coding for tRNA₁^met have been inserted into a λ vector via Hind III termini and cloned in E. coli. The organization of one cloned fragment has been analyzed by restriction endonuclease digestion and RNA-DNA hybridization. From the distribution of sites for three enzymes, this fragment appears to be typical of the majority of λ. laevis tandem tDNA₁^met repeat units. Evidence is presented to suggest that it contains two genes coding for tRNA₁^met and at least one gene coding for a second as yet unidentified 4S RNA species. The two tRNA₁^met genes are located on the same DNA strand 0.96 and 1.38 kb from one end of the repeat unit. A detailed restriction map for 19 enzymes reveals that the spacers between these genes are not identical, and it provides no indication of short repetitive sequence elements within the spacers.     

Nucleosomes and subnucleosomes: heterogeneity and composition

Previous studies (Varshavsky, Bakayev and Georgiev, 1976a) have shown that chromatin subunits (mononucleosomes) and their oligomers in a mild staphylococcal nuclease digest of chromatin display a heterogeneous content of histone H1. We now report that a mild staphylococcal nuclease digest of either chromatin or nuclei from mouse Ehrlich tumor cells contains mononucleosomes of three discrete kinds. The smallest mononucleosome (MN₁) contains all histones except H1 and a DNA fragment 140 base pairs (bp) long. The intermediate mononucleosome (MN₂) contains all five histones and a DNA fragment 170 bp long. The third mononucleosome (MN₃) also contains all five histones, but its DNA fragment is longer and more heterogeneous in size (180–200 bp). Most of the MN₃ particles are rapidly converted by nuclease into mononucleosomes MN₁ and MN₂ There exists, however, a relatively nuclease-resistant subpopulation of the MN₃ mononucleosomes. These 200 bp MN₁ particles contain not only histones but also nonhistone proteins, and are significantly more resistant to nuclease than the bulk of MN₃ particles and the smaller mononucleosomes MN₁ and MN₂.There are eight major kinds of staphylococcal nuclease-produced soluble subnucleosomes (SN). The SN₁ is a set of naked double-stranded DNA fragments ～20 bp long. The SN₂ is a complex of a specific basic nonhistone protein (molecular weight ～16,000 daltons) and a DNA fragment ～27 bp long. The SN₃ contains histone H4, the above-mentioned specific nonhistone protein and a DNA fragment ～27 bp long. The SN₄ contains histones H2a, H2b, H4 and a DNA fragment ～45 bp long. The SN₅ contains histones H2a, H2b, H3 and a DNA fragment ～55 bp long. The SN₆ is a complex of histone H1 and a DNA fragment ～35 bp long. Subnucleosomes SN₇ and SN₈ each contain all the histones except H1, and DNA fragments ～100 and ～120 bp long, respectively.Nuclease digestion of isolated mono- or dinucleosomes does not produce some of the subnucleosomes. These and related findings indicate that the cleavage required to generate these subnucleosomes result from some aspect of chromatin structure which is lost upon digestion to mono- and dinucleosomes.     

Dynamic Acetylation of All Lysine 4–Methylated Histone H3 in the Mouse Nucleus: Analysis at c-fos and c-jun

A major focus of current research into gene induction relates to chromatin and nucleosomal regulation, especially the significance of multiple histone modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation during this process. We have discovered a novel physiological characteristic of all lysine 4 (K4)–methylated histone H3 in the mouse nucleus, distinguishing it from lysine 9–methylated H3. K4-methylated histone H3 is subject to continuous dynamic turnover of acetylation, whereas lysine 9–methylated H3 is not. We have previously reported dynamic histone H3 phosphorylation and acetylation as a key characteristic of the inducible proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-jun. We show here that dynamically acetylated histone H3 at these genes is also K4-methylated. Although all three modifications are proven to co-exist on the same nucleosome at these genes, phosphorylation and acetylation appear transiently during gene induction, whereas K4 methylation remains detectable throughout this process. Finally, we address the functional significance of the turnover of histone acetylation on the process of gene induction. We find that inhibition of turnover, despite causing enhanced histone acetylation at these genes, produces immediate inhibition of gene induction. These data show that all K4-methylated histone H3 is subject to the continuous action of HATs and HDACs, and indicates that at c-fos and c-jun, contrary to the predominant model, turnover and not stably enhanced acetylation is relevant for efficient gene induction.     

Integration of hup Genes into the Genome of Chickpea-Rhizobium Through Site-Specific Recombination

The hup gene fragment of cosmid pHU52 was integrated into the genome of chickpea-Rhizobium Rcd301 via site-specific homologous recombination. Two small fragments of genomic DNA of strain Rcd301 itself were provided to flank cloned hup genes to facilitate the integration. The hup insert DNA of cosmid pHU52 was Isolated as an Intact 30.2 kb fragment using EcoRI, and cloned on partially restricted cosmid clone pSPSm3, which carries a DNA fragment of strain Rcd301 imparting streptomycin resistance. One of the recombinant cosmid clones, pBSL 12 thus obtained was conjugally transferred to the strain Rcd30₁. The integration of hup gene fragment into the genomic DNA through site-specific homologous recombination, was ensured by introducing an incompatible plasmid, pPH1 JI. The integration was confirmed by Southern hybridization. The integrated hup genes were found to express ex plants in two such constructs BSL 12–1 and BSL 12–3.