Comparative Genome Mapping of the Ataxia–Telangiectasia Region in Mouse, Rat, and Syrian Hamster

Chromosomal locations of theAtm(ataxia–telangiectasia (AT)-mutated) andAcat1(mitochondrial acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase) genes in mouse, rat, and Syrian hamster were determined by direct R-banding FISH. Both genes were colocalized to the C-D band of mouse chromosome 9, the proximal end of q24.1 of rat chromosome 8, and qa4–qa5 of Syrian hamster chromosome 12. The regions in the mouse and rat were homologous to human chromosome 11q. Fine genetic linkage mapping of the mouse AT region was performed using the interspecific backcross mice.Atm, Acat1,andNpat,which is a new gene isolated from the AT region, and 12 flanking microsatellite DNA markers were examined. No recombinations were found among theAtm, Npat, Acat1,andD9Mit6loci, and these loci were mapped 2.0 cM distal toD9Mit99and 1.3 cM proximal toD9Mit102.Comparison of the linkage map of mouse chromosome 9 (MMU9) and that of human chromosome 11 (HSA11) indicates that there is a chromosomal rearrangement due to an inversion betweenEts1andAtm–Npat–Acat1and that the inversion of MMU9 originated from the chromosomal breakage at the boundary betweenGria4andAtm–Npat–Acat1on HSA11. This type of inversion appeared to be conserved in the three rodent species, mouse, rat, and Syrian hamster, using additional comparative mapping data with theRckgene.     

Dosage compensation of a retina-specific gene in Drosophila miranda

The X1R chromosome of Drosophila miranda and the 3L autosome of Drosophila melanogaster are thought to have originated from the ancestral D chromosomal element and therefore may contain the same set of genes. It is expected that these genes will be dosage compensated in D. miranda because of their X linkage. To test these possibilities and to study evolution of the dosage compensation mechanism, we used the 3L-linked autosomal head-specific gene 507ml of D. melanogaster to isolate the homologous gene (507 mr) from a D. miranda genomic library. In situ hybridization showed that gene 507 is located at the 12A region of the X1R chromosome of D. miranda, indicating that the chromosomal homology deduced by cytogenetic means is correct. Restriction analysis and cross-specific DNA and RNA blot hybridization revealed the presence of extensive restriction pattern polymorphism and lack of sequence similarity in some areas of the 507 mr and 507 ml DNA, including the 3 portion of the transcribed region. However, the 5 portion of the transcribed region and the DNA sequences, located approximately 0.8 kb upstream and 3 kb downstream from the 507 ml gene showed a high degreee of similarity with the DNA sequences of comparable regions of the 507 mr gene. In both species gene 507 codes for a highly abundant 1.8 kb RNA which is expressed in the retina of the compound eye. Although in D. miranda the males have one and the females have two copies of the 507 gene, the steady-state levels of the 507 mRNA in both sexes were found to be similar, indicating that gene 507 is dosage compensated in D. miranda. Thus, along with the disparate rates of evolution in different areas of the DNA associated with gene 507, in D. miranda this gene has come under the regulation of the X chromosomal dosage compensation mechanism.by M.L. Pardue     

Localization of genes ecs,dor and swi in eight Drosophila species

A cluster of genes corresponding to the early ecdysone stimulated puff 2B of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome has been localized using in situ hybridization in eight Drosophila species. Genes ecs, dor and swi from this cluster have been mapped in D. funebris, D. virilis, D. hydei, D. repleta, D. mercatorum and D. paranaensis to the telomeric region of the X chromosome, in D. kanekoi to the distal region, and in D. pseudoobscura, to the proximal region of the X chromosome. It is assumed that organization of this cluster in these species is conserved. In D. hydei, multiple hybridization sites of certain DNA probes from this region were found.     

Analysis of chromosomal homologies between two species of the subgenus sophophora: D. miranda and D. melanogaster using cloned DNA segments

Chromosomal homology between two species of the subgenus Sophophora, D. miranda and D. melanogaster, belonging to the obscura and the melanogaster group respectively, was probed by DNA in situ cross hybridizations. A set of recombinant plasmids with inserts derived from the D. melanogaster genome were cross hybridized to the D. miranda karyotype. Vice versa, recombinant Lambda phages isolated from a genomic D. miranda library were localized in D. miranda and probed for localization in D. melanogaster. In the main, the results support the homology relations proposed on the basis of cytogenetic data. However, the location of both tandemly repetitive genes tested, 5S RNA genes and the histone genes, is not in accordance with expectation. The 5S RNA genes, when probed with the D. melanogaster plasmid 12D8 (Artavanis-Tsakonas et al., 1977), were found to occur at two sites in both, D. miranda and D. pseudoobscura.     

Telomere repeats within the neo-Y-chromosome of Drosophila miranda

The clone Dmir1098, isolated from a genomic lambda library of Drosophila miranda labels exclusively the tips of the giant chromosomes in the highly polytenized nuclei of the female larval salivary glands. However, the in situ hybridizations to male metaphase plates, using the same probe, reveal a massive labeling block within the neo-Y-chromosome in addition to the labeling blocks at both chromosome ends. From the comparison with the Y chromosome labeling pattern of D. pseudoobscura, a sibling species to D. miranda, an end-to-end fusion mechanism involving the telomere repeats would be the most straightforward explanation for the karyotype change in D. miranda.     

Dosage compensation of X-linked heat-shock puffs in Drophila pseudoobscura

Four major puffs are inducible by heat shock in the larval salivary gland chromosomes of D. pseudoobscura. Two of these puffs are present at 23 and 39–40 on the right arm of the X chromosome and two are present at 53 and 58 on chromosome 2. By means of in situ hybridization, residual homologies were demonstrated between the puffs at 23 in D. pseudoobscura and at 63C in D. melanogaster, and between the two chromosome 2 puffs of D. pseudoobscura and 87A and 87C of D. melanogaster. RNA synthesis was monitored as a function of ³H-uridine incorporation in the major heat-induced puffs of D. pseudoobscura and was found to be equivalent in males and females indicating dosage compensation of the two X-linked loci. The evolution of the regulatory controls of these genes is discussed.     

High-Resolution Linkage Map of Mouse Chromosome 13 in the Vicinity of the Host Resistance LocusLgn1

Natural resistance of inbred mouse strains to infection withLegionella pneumophilais controlled by the expression of a single dominant gene on chromosome 13, designatedLgn1.The genetic difference atLgn1is phenotypically expressed as the presence or absence of intracellular replication ofL. pneumophilain host macrophages. In our effort to identify theLgn1gene by positional cloning, we have generated a high-resolution linkage map of theLgn1chromosomal region. For this, we have carried out extensive segregation analysis in a total of 1270 (A/J × C57BL/6J) × A/J informative backcross mice segregating the resistance allele of C57BL/6J and the susceptibility allele of A/J. Additional segregation analyses were carried out in three preexisting panels of C57BL/6J ×Mus spretusinterspecific backcross mice. A total of 39 DNA markers were mapped within an interval of approximately 30 cM overlapping theLgn1region. Combined pedigree analyses for the 5.4-cM segment overlappingLgn1indicated the locus order and the interlocus distances (in cM):D13Mit128–(1.4)–D13Mit194–(0.1)–D13Mit147–(0.9)–D13Mit36–(0.9)–D13Mit146–(0.2)–Lgn1/D13Mit37–(1.0)–D13Mit70.Additional genetic linkage studies of markers not informative in the A/J × C57BL/6J cross positionedD13Mit30, -72, -195,and-203, D13Gor4, D13Hun35,andMtap5in the immediate vicinity of theLgn1locus. The marker density and resolution of this genetic linkage map should allow the construction of a physical map of the region and the isolation of YAC clones overlapping the gene.     

Human Mucin Genes Assigned to 11p15.5: Identification and Organization of a Cluster of Genes

Four distinct genes that encode mucins have previously been mapped to chromosome 11p15.5. Three of these genes (MUC2, MUC5AC,andMUC6) show a high level of genetically determined polymorphism and were analyzed in the CEPH families. Linkage analysis placed all three genes on the genetic map in a cluster betweenHRASandINS,and more detailed analysis of recombinant breakpoints revealed thatMUC6is telomeric toMUC2.Using these recombinantsD11S150was mapped close toMUC2.Ten of the 11 recombinant chromosomes studied in detail were paternal, and the recombinant events were distributed throughout the 11p15 region, suggesting that the high level of recombination observed in 11p15.5 is not due to a particular recombinational hot spot. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to make a detailed physical map of theMUCcluster and to integrate the physical and genetical maps. The gene order was determined to beHRAS–MUC6–MUC2–MUC5AC–MUC5B–IGF2.TheMUCgenes span a region of some 400 kb and the map extends 770 kb and contains 15 putative CpG islands. The order of theMUCgenes on the map corresponds to the relative order of their expression along the anterior–posterior axis of the body, suggesting a possible functional significance to the gene order.     

Cytogenetic mapping of marker genes on the chromosome elements C and E of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. subobscura

Enzyme loci, visible marker genes and -cloned DNA-sequences from a D. miranda library were mapped cytologically on the chromosome elements C and E of D. pseudoobscura and D. subobscura. New data are incorporated into the linkage maps of the two species. Homologous segments can now be localized in the polytene chromosomes with these markers. A comparison of the chromosome elements E of D. melanogaster and D. subobscura shows 12 conserved subsections which have been rearranged by paracentric inversions in the evolution of the two lineages.     

Differences in the organization and chromosomal allocation of satellite DNA between the European long tailed house miceMus domesticus andMus musculus

We compared the organization of satellite DNA (stDNA) and its chromosomal allocation inMus domesticus and inMus musculus. The two stDNAs show similar restriction fragment profiles after digestion (probed withM. domesticus stDNA) with some endonucleases of which restriction sequences are present in the 230–240 bp repetitive unit of theM. domesticus stDNA. In contrast, EcoRI digestion reveals thatM. musculus stDNA lacks most of the GAATTC restriction sites, particularly at the level of the half-monomer. The chromosome distribution of stDNA (revealed by anM. domesticus stDNA probe) shows different patterns in theM. domesticus andM. musculus karyotypes, with about 60% ofM. domesticus stDNA retained in theM. musculus genome. It is particularly noteworthy that the pericentromeric regions ofM. musculus chromosomes 1 and X are totally devoid ofM. domesticus stDNA sequences. In both groups, the differences in energy transfer between the stDNA-bound fluorochromes Hoechst 33258 and propidium iodide suggest that AT-rich repeated sequences have a much more clustered array in theM. domesticus stDNA, as if they are organized in tandem repeats longer than those ofM. musculus. Considering the data as a whole, it seems likely that the evolutionary paths of the two stDNAs diverged after the generation of the ancestral 230–240 bp stDNA repetitive unit through the amplification, in theM. domesticus genome, of a family repeat which included the EcoRI GAATTC restriction sequence.     

An evolutionary model for the duplication and divergence of esterase genes in Drosophila

Summary The esterase 5 (Est-5 = gene, EST 5 = protein) enzyme in Drosophila pseudoobscura is encoded by one of three paralogous genes, Est-5A, Est5B, and Est-5C, that are tightly clustered on the right arm of the X chromosome. The homologous Est-6 locus in Drosophila melanogaster has only one paralogous neighbor, Est-P. Comparisons of coding and flanking DNA sequences among the three D. pseudoobscura and two D. melanogaster genes suggest that two paralogous genes were present before the divergence of D. pseudoobscura from D. melanogaster and that, later, a second duplication occurred in D. pseudoobscura. Nucleotide sequences of the coding regions of the three D. pseudoobscura genes showed 78–85% similarity in pairwise comparisons, whereas the relatedness between Est-6 and Est-P was only 67%. The higher degree of conservation in D. pseudoobscura likely results from the comparatively recent divergence of Est-5B and Est-5C and from possible gene conversion events between Est-5A and Est-5B. Analyses of silent and replacement site differences in the two exons of the paralogous and orthologous genes in each species indicate that common selective forces are acting on all five loci. Further evidence for common purifying selective constraints comes from the conservation of hydropathy profiles and proposed catalytic residues. However, different levels of amino acid substitution between the paralogous genes in D. melanogaster relative to those in D. pseudoobscura suggest that interspecific differences in selection also exist.Offprint requests to: R.C. Richmond     

Chromosomal homologies betweenDrosophila lebanonensis andD. melanogaster determined by in situ hybridization

Twelve biotin-labelled recombinant DNA probes were hybridized to polytene chromosomes ofDrosophila melanogaster andD. lebanonesis. Probes were chosen in order to cover the whole chromosomal complement. Six probes correspond to known genes fromD. melanogaster (RpII215, H3–H4, MHC, hsp28/23, hsp83, hsp70), four probes are clones isolated from aD. subobscura library (Xdh, DsubS3, DsubG3, DsubG4) and the remaining two probes correspond to the Adh gene ofD. lebanonensis and to one sequence (262), not yet characterized, from the same species. The chromosomal homologies obtained from the in situ hybridization results allow us to determine that Muller's C and D chromosomal elements are fused in the karyotype ofD. lebanonensis and constitute the large metacentric chromosome. Single pericentric inversions in theE andB elements have generated the medium and small metacentric chromosomes, respectively. No great changes are detected in Muller'sA element, which remains acrocentric. The changes detected in the karyotypic evolution ofD. lebanonensis are frequently observed inDrosophila evolution, as deduced from chromosomal homologies of severalDrosophila species. The results are also consistent with Muller's proposal that chromosomal elements have been conserved during the evolution ofDrosophila.     

Evolution of the Larval Cuticle Proteins Coded by the Secondary Sex Chromosome Pair: X2 and Neo-Y of Drosophila miranda: I. Comparison at the DNA Sequence Level

The larval cuticle protein genes (Lcps) represent a multigene family located at the right arm of the metacentric autosome 2 (2R) in Drosophila melanogaster. Due to a chromosome fusion the Lcp locus of Drosophila miranda is situated on a pair of secondary sex chromosomes, the X2 and neo-Y chromosome. Comparing the DNA sequences from D. miranda and D. melanogaster organization and the gene arrangement of Lcp1–Lcp4 are similar, although the intergene distances vary considerably. The greatest difference between Lcp1 and Lcp2 is due to the occurrence of a pseudogene in D. melanogaster which is not present in D. miranda. Thus the cluster of the four Lcp genes existed already before the separation of the melanogaster and obscura group. Intraspecific homogenizations of different cluster units must have occurred repeatedly between the Lcp1/Lcp2 and Lcp3/Lcp4 sequence types. The most obvious example is exon 2 of the Lcp3 gene in D. miranda, which has been substituted by the corresponding section of the Lcp4 gene rather recently. The homogenization must have occurred before the translocation which generated the neo-Y chromosome. Lcp3 of D. melanogaster has therefore no orthologous partner in D. miranda. Rearrangements in the promoter regions of the D. miranda Lcp genes have generated new, potentially functional CAAT-box motifs. Since three of the Lcp alleles on the neo-Y are not expressed and Lcp3 is expressed only at a reduced level, it is suggestive to speculate that the rearrangements might be involved as cis-regulatory elements in the up-regulation of the X2-chromosomal Lcp alleles, in Drosophila an essential process for dosage compensation. The Lcp genes on the neo-Y chromosome have accumulated more base substitutions than the corresponding alleles on the X2. Received: 27 December 1995 / Accepted: 30 April 1996     

Length polymorphism in the threonine-glycine-encoding repeat region of theperiod gene inDrosophila

Summary Single-fly polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct DNA sequencing revealed high levels of length polymorphism in the threonine-glycine encoding repeat region of theperiod (per) gene in natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. DNA comparison of two alleles of identical lengths gave a high number of synonymous substitutions suggesting an ancient time of separation. However detailed examination of the sequences of different Thr-Gly length variants indicated that this divergence could be understood in terms of four deletion/insertion events. InDrosophila pseudoobscura a length polymorphism is observed in a five-amino acid degenerate repeat, which corresponds tomelanogaster's Thr-Gly domain. In spite of the differences betweenD. melanogaster andD. pseudoobscura in the amino acid sequence of the repeats, the predicted secondary structures suggest evolutionary and mechanistic constraints on theper protein of these two species.     

The<Emphasis Type="Italic"> ThioredoxinT</Emphasis> and<Emphasis Type="Italic"> deadhead</Emphasis> gene pair encode testis- and ovary-specific thioredoxins in<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis>

So far, two thioredoxin proteins, DHD and Trx-2, have been biochemically characterized in Drosophila melanogaster. Here, with the cloning and characterization of TrxT we describe an additional thioredoxin with testis-specific expression. TrxT and dhd are arranged as a gene pair, transcribed in opposite directions and sharing a 471 bp regulatory region. We show that this regulatory region is sufficient for correct expression of the two genes. This gene pair makes a good model for unraveling how closely spaced promoters are differentially regulated by a short common control region. Both TrxT and DHD proteins are localized within the nuclei in testes and ovaries, respectively. Use of a transgenic construct expressing TrxT fused to Enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein reveals a clear association of TrxT with the Y chromosome lampbrush loops ks-1 and kl-5 in primary spermatocytes. The association is lost in the absence of the Y chromosome. Our results suggest that nuclear thioredoxins may have regulatory functions in the germline.Sequence data from this paper have been deposited with the EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under Accession number AJ507731     

Patterns of DNA-Sequence Divergence Between <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila miranda</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">D. pseudoobscura</Emphasis>

Contrary to the classical view, a large amount of non-coding DNA seems to be selectively constrained in Drosophila and other species. Here, using Drosophila miranda BAC sequences and the Drosophila pseudoobscura genome sequence, we aligned coding and non-coding sequences between D. pseudoobscura and D. miranda, and investigated their patterns of evolution. We found two patterns that have previously been observed in comparisons between Drosophila melanogaster and its relatives. First, there is a negative correlation between intron divergence and intron length, suggesting that longer non-coding sequences may contain more regulatory elements than shorter sequences. Our other main finding is a negative correlation between the rate of non-synonymous substitutions (d _N) and codon usage bias (F _op), showing that fast-evolving genes have a lower codon usage bias, consistent with strong positive selection interfering with weak selection for codon usage.