Mutual self-defence: the trypanolytic factor story

Around 1900 Laveran and Mesnil discovered that African trypanosomes (prototype: Trypanosoma brucei brucei) do not survive in the blood of some primates and humans. The nature of the trypanolytic factor present in these sera has been the focus of a long-standing debate between different groups, but recent developments have allowed the proposal of a coherent model incorporating most seemingly divergent views and providing an interesting example of the complex interplay that continuously occurs between hosts and parasites. Possibly as an adaptation to their natural environment, great African apes and humans have acquired a new member of the apolipoprotein-L family, termed apoL1. This protein is the only one of the family to be secreted in the blood, where it binds to a subset of HDL particles that also contain another human-specific protein, haptoglobin-related protein or Hpr. T. b. brucei possesses a specific surface receptor for the haptoglobin-hemoglobin (Hp-Hb) complex, as a way to capture heme into hemoproteins that contribute to cell growth and resistance to the oxidative stress of the host. As this receptor does not discriminate between Hp and Hpr, Hpr-containing HDL particles of human serum are efficiently taken up by the parasite, leading to the simultaneous internalization of apoL1, Hpr and Hb-derived heme. Once in the lysosome, apoL1 is targeted to the lysosomal membrane, where its colicin-like anionic pore-forming activity triggers an influx of chloride ions from the cytoplasm. Osmotic effect linked to this ionic flux leads to uncontrolled swelling of the lysosome, ultimately causing the death of the parasite. Two T. brucei clones, termed Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, have managed to resist this lysis mechanism and, therefore, cause sleeping sickness in humans. While the mechanism of this resistance is still not known in the case of T. b. gambiense, the dominant factor responsible for resistance of T. b. rhodesiense has been identified. This protein, named SRA for Serum Resistance-Associated, is a truncated version of the major and variable surface antigen of the parasite, the Variant Surface Glycoprotein or VSG. Presumably due to its defective nature, SRA is not targeted to the plasma membrane as do regular VSGs, but ends up in the late endosomal compartment. In this location SRA is thought to neutralize apoL1 through coiled-coil interactions between alpha-helices. We discuss the potential of these discoveries in terms of fight against the disease.     

Microglial self-defence mediated through GLT-1 and glutathione

Glutamate is stored in synaptic vesicles in presynaptic neurons. It is released into the synaptic cleft to provide signalling to postsynaptic neurons. Normally, the astroglial glutamate transporters GLT-1 and GLAST take up glutamate to mediate a high signal-to-noise ratio in the synaptic signalling, and also to prevent excitotoxic effects by glutamate. In astrocytes, glutamate is transformed into glutamine, which is safely transported back to neurons. However, in pathological conditions, such as an ischemia or virus infection, astroglial transporters are down-regulated which could lead to excitotoxicity. Lately, it was shown that even microglia can express glutamate transporters during pathological events. Microglia have two systems for glutamate transport: GLT-1 for transport into the cells and the x_c⁻ system for transport out of the cells. We here review results from our work and others, which demonstrate that microglia in culture express GLT-1, but not GLAST, and transport glutamate from the extracellular space. We also show that TNF-α can induce increased microglial GLT-1 expression, possibly associating the expression with inflammatory systems. Furthermore, glutamate taken up through GLT-1 may be used for direct incorporation into glutathione and to fuel the intracellular glutamate pool to allow cystine uptake through the x_c⁻ system. This can lead to a defence against oxidative stress and have an antiviral function.     

Ribosomal resistance as a wide-spread self-defence mechanism in aminoglycoside-producing Micromonospora species

Abstract The mechanism of self-defence against their own product was studied in five aminoglycoside-producing Micromonospora (M.) species: M. grisea (verdamicin producer); M. inyoensis (sisomicin producer); M. sagamiensis (sagamicin producer); M. rhodorangea (antibiotic G-418 producer) and M. zionensis (antibiotic G-52 producer). Analysis of cell-free extracts of these organisms showed that they were devoid of modification enzymes specific for aminoglycosides. They contained, however, high-level resistant ribosomes. Mixed subunit exchange experiments of ribosomes from the producer strains and from a sensitive non-producing species ( M. melanosporea ) demonstrated that it is the 30S subunit which confers resistance.