Temporospatial cell interactions regulating mandibular and maxillary arch patterning

The cellular origin of the instructive information for hard tissue patterning of the jaws has been the subject of a long-standing controversy. Are the cranial neural crest cells prepatterned or does the epithelium pattern a developmentally uncommitted population of ectomesenchymal cells? In order to understand more about how orofacial patterning is controlled we have investigated the temporal signalling interactions and responses between epithelium and mesenchymal cells in the mandibular and maxillary primordia. We show that within the mandibular arch, homeobox genes that are expressed in different proximodistal spatial domains corresponding to presumptive molar and incisor ectomesenchymal cells are induced by signals from the oral epithelium. In mouse, prior to E10, all ectomesenchyme cells in the mandibular arch are equally responsive to epithelial signals such as Fgf8, indicating that there is no pre-specification of these cells into different populations and suggesting that patterning of the hard tissues of the mandible is instructed by the epithelium. By E10.5, ectomesenchymal cell gene expression domains are still dependent on epithelial signals but have become fixed and ectopic expression cannot be induced. At E11 expression becomes independent of epithelial signals such that removal of the epithelium does not affect spatial ectomesenchymal expression. Significantly, however, the response of ectomesenchyme cells to epithelial regulatory signals was found to be different in the mandibular and maxillary primordium. Thus, whereas both mandibular and maxillary arch epithelia could induce Dlx2 and Dlx5 expression in the mandible and Dlx2 expression in the maxilla, neither could induce Dlx5 expression in the maxilla. Reciprocal cell transplantations between mandibular and maxillary arch ectomesenchymal cells revealed intrinsic differences between these populations of cranial neural crest-derived cells. Research in odontogenesis has shown that the oral epithelium of the mandibular and maxillary primordia has unique instructive signaling properties required to direct odontogenesis, which are not found in other branchial arch epithelia. As a consequence, development of jaw-specific skeletal structures may require some prespecification of maxillary ectomesenchyme to restrict the instructive influence of the epithelial signals and allow development of maxillary structures distinct from mandibular structures.     

In vitro analysis of mesenchymal influences on the differentiation of stomach epithelial cells of the chicken embryo

It is well established that epithelial-mesenchymal interactions play important roles in the differentiation of stomach epithelial cells in the chicken embryo. To analyze mesenchymal influences on the differentiation of the epithelial cells, we developed a tissue culture system for stomach (proventriculus and gizzard) epithelia of chicken embryo, and examined their differentiation in the presence or absence of mesenchyme. Stomach epithelium from 6-day chicken embryo did not express embryonic chicken pepsinogen (ECPg), a marker molecule of glandular epithelial cells of proventriculus, while it expressed marker molecules of epithelial cells of the luminal surface of stomach, when cultured alone on the Millipore filter, covered with the gel consisting of extracellular matrix components. When the epithelium was recombined with mesenchyme separated by the filter, differentiation of the epithelium was affected by the recombined mesenchyme. Proventricular and lung mesenchymes induced the expression of ECPg in epithelial cells, and the expression was extensive when the gel contained basement membrane components. Proventricular and gizzard epithelia showed different responses to the mesenchymal action. We tested the effects of some growth factors on the differentiation of epithelial cells using this culture system. Furthermore we devised a "conditioned semi-solid medium experiment" for analysis of the inductive properties of proventricular and lung mesenchymes. The results of this experiment clearly demonstrated for the first time that diffusible factors from mesenchyme induce the differentiation of glandular epithelial cells in the absence of mesenchymal cells.     

Intergenic enhancers with distinct activities regulate Dlx gene expression in the mesenchyme of the branchial arches

The vertebrate Dlx genes, generally organized as tail-to-tail bigene clusters, are expressed in the branchial arch epithelium and mesenchyme with nested proximodistal expression implicating a code that underlies the fates of jaws. Little is known of the regulatory architecture that is responsible for Dlx gene expression in developing arches. We have identified two distinct cis-acting regulatory sequences, I12a and I56i, in the intergenic regions of the Dlx1/2 and Dlx5/6 clusters that act as enhancers in the arch mesenchyme. LacZ transgene expression containing I12a is restricted to a subset of Dlx-expressing ectomesenchyme in the first arch. The I56i enhancer is active in a broader domain in the first arch mesenchyme. Expression of transgenes containing either the I12a or the I56i enhancers is dependent on the presence of epithelium between the onset of their expression at E9-10 until independence at E11. Both enhancers positively respond to FGF8 and FGF9; however, the responses of the reporter transgenes were limited to their normal domain of expression. BMP4 had a negative effect on expression of both transgenes and counteracted the effects of FGF8. Furthermore, bosentan, a pharmacological inhibitor of Endothelin-1 signaling caused a loss of I56i-lacZ expression in the most distal aspects of the expression domain, corresponding to the area of Dlx-6 expression previously shown to be under the control of Endothelin-1. Thus, the combinatorial branchial arch expression of Dlx genes is achieved through interactions between signaling pathways and intrinsic cellular factors. I56i drives the entire expression of Dlx5/6 in the first arch and contains necessary sequences for regulation by at least three separate pathways, whereas I12a only replicates a small domain of endogenous expression, regulated in part by BMP-4 and FGF-8.     

Lack of either chondrocyte hypertrophy or osteogenesis in Meckel's cartilage of the embryonic chick exposed to epithelia and to thyroxine in vitro

Osteogenesis was not initiated when Meckel's cartilages from embryonic chicks of Hamburger and Hamilton (H. H.) stages 38 and 39 were recombined with mandibular epithelia obtained from embryos of H. H. stage 22 (a stage when an epithelial-mesenchymal interaction elicits osteogenesis from mandibular mesenchyme) and grafted to the chorioallantoic membranes of host embryos for 7 to 21 days. Failure of osteogenesis was not because the cartilage inhibited or blocked the osteogenesis-initiating capabilities of mandibular epithelium for mandibular epithelia could still elicit osteogenesis when removed from Meckel's cartilages and recombined with mandibular mesenchyme. Chondrocyte hypertrophy is associated with osteogenesis in other cartilages, including Meckel's cartilage from rodent embryos. However, Meckel's cartilages from chick embryos of H. H. stages 34, 38, and 39 failed to hypertrophy when cultured in the presence of 7.5 nM thyroxine (3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyroxine), although H. H. stage 28 tibial chondrocytes cocultured with Meckel's cartilage did hypertrophy. Therefore, avian Meckelian chondrocytes fail to hypertrophy or to produce osteoprogenitor cells in response to stimuli known to evoke these events in other skeletal cells.     

Dlx5 regulates regional development of the branchial arches and sensory capsules.

We report the generation and analysis of mice homozygous for a targeted deletion of the Dlx5 homeobox gene. Dlx5 mutant mice have multiple defects in craniofacial structures, including their ears, noses, mandibles and calvaria, and die shortly after birth. A subset (28%) exhibit exencephaly. Ectodermal expression of Dlx5 is required for the development of olfactory and otic placode-derived epithelia and surrounding capsules. The nasal capsules are hypoplastic (e.g. lacking turbinates) and, in most cases, the right side is more severely affected than the left. Dorsal otic vesicle derivatives (e. g. semicircular canals and endolymphatic duct) and the surrounding capsule, are more severely affected than ventral (cochlear) structures. Dlx5 is also required in mandibular arch ectomesenchyme, as the proximal mandibular arch skeleton is dysmorphic. Dlx5 may control craniofacial development in part through the regulation of the goosecoid homeobox gene. goosecoid expression is greatly reduced in Dlx5 mutants, and both goosecoid and Dlx5 mutants share a number of similar craniofacial malformations. Dlx5 may perform a general role in skeletal differentiation, as exemplified by hypomineralization within the calvaria. The distinct focal defects within the branchial arches of the Dlx1, Dlx2 and Dlx5 mutants, along with the nested expression of their RNAs, support a model in which these genes have both redundant and unique functions in the regulation of regional patterning of the craniofacial ectomesenchyme.     

Ectodermally derived FGF8 defines the maxillomandibular region in the early chick embryo: epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the specification of the craniofacial ectomesenchyme

The most rostral cephalic crest cells in the chick embryo first populate ubiquitously in the rostroventral head. Before the influx of crest cells, the ventral head ectoderm expresses Fgf8 in two domains that correspond to the future mandibular arch. Bmp4 is expressed rostral and caudal to these domains. The rostral part of the Bmp4 domain develops into the rostral end of the maxillary process that corresponds to the transition between the maxillomandibular and premandibular regions. Thus, the distribution patterns of FGF8 and BMP4 appear to foreshadow the maxillomandibular region in the head ectoderm. In the ectomesenchyme of the pharyngula embryo, expression patterns of some homeobox genes overlap the distribution of their upstream growth factors. Dlx1 and Barx1, the targets of FGF8, are expressed in the mandibular ectomesenchyme, and Msx1, the target of BMP4, in its distal regions. Ectopic applications of FGF8 lead to shifted expression of the target genes as well as repatterning of the craniofacial primordia and of the trigeminal nerve branches. Focal injection of a lipophilic dye, DiI, showed that this shift was at least in part due to the posterior transformation of the original premandibular ectomesenchyme into the mandible, caused by the changed distribution of FGF8 that defines the mandibular region. We conclude that FGF8 in the early ectoderm defines the maxillomandibular region of the prepharyngula embryo, through epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and subsequent upregulation of homeobox genes in the local mesenchyme. BMP4 in the ventral ectoderm appears to limit the anterior expression of Fgf8. Ectopic application of BMP4 consistently diminished part of the mandibular arch.     

An SEM analysis of the epithelial--mesenchymal interface in the mandible of the embryonic chick

In this paper the ultrastructural features of the epithelial-mesenchymal interface in mandibular processes of embryonic chicks have been examined using scanning electron microscopy. Mandibular epithelium is required for the mesenchyme to differentiate as osteoblasts and to deposit the membrane bones of the mandible. The surface morphology of the epithelium changes from the lateral to the medial face of the mandible from rounded cells, each with a central cilium to flattened cells with numerous microvilli. Treatment with trypsin and pancreatin was used to digest the basal lamina so as to separate epithelium from mesenchyme. This exposed a thick, fibrillar basement membrane (reticular lamina), which was thicker underlying the caudal epithelium than under the cephalad epithelium. Addition of collagenase to the trypsin/pancreatin solution degraded some of the basement lamella, especially that underlying epithelium on the caudal portion of each mandibular process. Selective degradation of basement lamella is postulated as one means of regulating inductive epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. EDTA was used to isolate basal laminae on mandibular mesenchyme. SEM was used to confirm the integrity of the basal lamina, its structure, and its association with overlying epithelial cells and underlying basement lamella.     

Endothelin-1 regulates the dorsoventral branchial arch patterning in mice

Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a 21-amino acid peptide secreted by the epithelium and core mesenchyme in the branchial arches as well as vascular endothelium, is involved in craniofacial and cardiovascular development through endothelin receptor type-A (EdnrA) expressed in the neural crest-derived ectomesenchyme. Here we show that ET-1(-/-) mutant mice exhibit a homeotic-like transformation of the lower jaw to an upper jaw. Most of the maxillary arch-derived components are duplicated and replaced mandibular arch-derived structures, resulting in a mirror image of the upper and lower jaws in the ET-1(-/-) mutant. As for hyoid arch-derivatives, the ventral structures are severely affected in comparison to the dorsal ones in the ET-1(-/-) mutant. Correspondingly, the expression of Dlx5 and Dlx6, Distalless-related homeobox genes determining the ventral identity of the anterior branchial arches, and of the mandibular marker gene Pitx1 is significantly downregulated in the ET-1(-/-) mutant, whereas the expression of Dlx2 and the maxillary marker gene Prx2 is unaffected or rather upregulated. These findings indicate that the ET-1/EdnrA signaling may contribute to the dorsoventral axis patterning of the branchial arch system as a mediator of the regional intercellular interactions.     

Epithelia are interchangeable between facial primordia of chick embryos and morphogenesis is controlled by the mesenchyme

The embryonic chick face is composed of a series of facial primordia, epithelium-covered buds of mesenchyme, which surround the presumptive mouth. The protruding adult upper beak containing the prenasal cartilage is formed from the frontonasal mass, the paired maxillary primordia form the sides of the face, while the lower beak is derived from the paired mandibular primordia which contain the two Meckel's cartilages. When grafted to a host wing bud, the frontonasal mass and the mandibular primordia both form elongated outgrowths, whereas the maxillary primordium forms a ball of tissue. Facial epithelium is required for growth and morphogenesis of all primordia. Recombinations between epithelium and mesenchyme from different primordia show that the epithelia are interchangeable and appear to be equivalent. Even the epithelium from the maxillary primordium that does not grow out in a polarized fashion can support outgrowth of the frontonasal mass and mandibular mesenchyme. The form of the recombined graft is determined by the mesenchymal component.     

Role of the early epithelium in the patterning of the teeth and Meckel's cartilage.

Embryonic epithelium from the mandibular branchial arch organizes the dentition and the deposition of Meckel's cartilage. During 9-11 days of gestation mandibular arch epithelium can induce teeth in nondental ectomesenchyme in both mice and birds. In addition, the deposition of Meckel's cartilage as a rod of cartilage in the middle of the first branchial arch is under the control of the epithelium. The epithelium inhibits chondrogenesis; if it is removed, large amorphous masses of cartilage are found instead of the narrow rod typical of Meckel's cartilage.     

The homeobox gene Hox 7.1 has specific regional and temporal expression patterns during early murine craniofacial embryogenesis, especially tooth development in vivo and in vitro.

Hox 7.1 is a murine homeobox-containing gene expressed in a range of neural-crest-derived tissues and areas of putative epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during embryogenesis. We have examined the expression of Hox 7.1 during craniofacial development in the mouse embryo between days 8 and 16 of development. Whereas facial expression at day 10 of gestation is broadly localised in the neural-crest-derived mesenchyme of the medial nasal, lateral nasal, maxillary and mandibular processes, by day 12 expression is restricted to the mesenchyme immediately surrounding the developing tooth germs in the maxillary and mandibular processes. Hox 7.1 expression in the mesenchyme of the dental papilla and follicle is maximal at the cap stage of development and progressively declines in the bell stage prior to differentiation of odontoblasts and ameloblasts. Hox 7.1 expression in tooth germs is independent of overall embryonic stage of development but is dependent on stage of development of the individual tooth. Similar patterns of transient Hox 7.1 expression can also be detected in tooth germs in vitro in organ cultures of day 11 first branchial arch explants cultured for up to 7 days. Hox 7.1 is also expressed early in development (days 10/11) in the epithelium of the developing anterior pituitary (Rathke's pouch), the connective tissue capsule and meninges of the developing brain, and specific regions of neuroepithelium in the developing brain.     

Fgf and Bmp signals repress the expression of Bapx1 in the mandibular mesenchyme and control the position of the developing jaw joint

The development of the jaw joint between the palatoquadrate and proximal part Meckel's cartilage (articular) has recently been shown to involve the gene Bapx1. Bapx1 is expressed in the developing mandibular arch in two distinct caudal, proximal patches, one on either side of the head. These domains coincide later with the position of the developing jaw joint. The mechanisms that result in the restricted expression of Bapx1 in the mandibular arch were investigated, and two signaling factors that act as repressors were identified. Fibroblast growth factors (Fgfs) expressed in the oral epithelium restrict expression of Bapx1 to the caudal half of the mandibular arch, while bone morphogenetic proteins (Bmps) expressed in the distal mandibular arch restrict expression of Bapx1 to the proximal part of the mandible. Application of Fgf8 and Bmp4 beads to the proximal mesenchyme led to loss of Bapx1 expression and later fusion of the quadrate and articular as the jaw joint failed to form. In addition to fusion of the jaw joint, loss of Bapx1 lead to loss of the retroarticular process (RAP), phenocopying the defects seen after Bapx1 function was reduced in the zebrafish. By manipulating these signals, we were able to alter the expression domain of Bapx1, resulting in a new position of the jaw joint.     

Gizzard epithelium of chick embryos can express embryonic pepsinogen antigen,a marker protein of proventriculus

Summary The avian stomach is composed of two distinct organs, the proventriculus and the gizzard. Pepsinogen expression in the proventricular and gizzard epithelia of chick embryos was investigated immunohistochemically with anti-embryonic chick pepsinogen (anti-ECPg) antiserum. In normal development, the ECPg antigen was expressed only in the glandular epithelial cells of the embryonic proventriculus from the 8th day of incubation onwards. However, both proventricular and gizzard epithelia of 6-day embryos expressed the ECPg antigen when recombined and cultured with the proventricular mesenchyme. Chronological studies revealed that the ECPg antigen was first detected in a few epithelial cells at 3 days of cultivation. The percentage of ECPg-positive cells among the total epithelial cells in each recombinant increased with the length of the culture period and all the glandular epithelial cells were positive at 9 days. During this process, the percentage of ECPg-positive cells in each cultured recombinant was similar in proventricular and gizzard epithelia. Moreover, both epithelia could express the ECPg antigen when recombined and cultured with the oesophageal or small-intestine mesenchyme for 9 days, though the percentage of ECPg-positive cells in each cultured recombinant was much lower than that in the cultured recombinant with the proventricular mesenchyme. These results indicate that the gizzard epithelium of 6-day chick embryos possesses a similar potential for pepsinogen expression as the proventricular epithelium of the same age.     

MEK-ERK signaling plays diverse roles in the regulation of facial chondrogenesis

The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, also known as the MEK-ERK cascade, has been shown to regulate cartilage differentiation in embryonic limb mesoderm and several chondrogenic cell lines. In the present study, we employed the micromass culture system to define the roles of MEK-ERK signaling in the chondrogenic differentiation of neural crest-derived ectomesenchyme cells of the embryonic chick facial primordia. In cultures of frontonasal mesenchyme isolated from stage 24/25 embryos, treatment with the MEK inhibitor U0126 increased type II collagen and glycosaminoglycan deposition into cartilage matrix, elevated mRNA levels for three chondrogenic marker genes (col2a1, aggrecan, and sox9), and increased expression of a Sox9-responsive collagen II enhancer-luciferase reporter gene. Transfection of frontonasal mesenchyme cells with dominant negative ERK increased collagen II enhancer activation, whereas transfection of constitutively active MEK decreased its activity. Thus, MEK-ERK signaling inhibits chondrogenesis in stage 24/25 frontonasal mesenchyme. Conversely, MEK-ERK signaling enhanced chondrogenic differentiation in mesenchyme of the stage 24/25 mandibular arch. In mandibular mesenchyme cultures, pharmacological MEK inhibition decreased cartilage matrix deposition, cartilage-specific RNA levels, and collagen II enhancer activity. Expression of constitutively active MEK increased collagen II enhancer activation in mandibular mesenchyme, while dominant negative ERK had the opposite effect. Interestingly, MEK-ERK modulation had no significant effects on cultures of maxillary or hyoid process mesenchyme cells. Moreover, we observed a striking shift in the response of frontonasal mesenchyme to MEK-ERK modulation by stage 28/29 of development.     

Early Development of Mouse Anterior Pituitary: Role of Mesenchyme

Epithelial-mesenchymal interaction in the early development of the anterior pituitary gland was examined by chronological observations on fetal pituitary epithelium grafted in vivo with and without its own mesenchyme. At 8.5 days of gestation, the RATHKE'S pouch began to evaginate toward the diencephalon. The mesenchymal tissue around the pouch was at first very sparsely scattered, but then condensed, on day 10 becoming visible under a dissecting microscope. When RATHKE'S pouch epithelia from 10- and 12-day fetuses were transplanted alone under the kidney capsule, they proliferated slightly to form cysts, the cells of which differentiated into ACTH-producing cells, but not into prolactin-producing cells. Pituitary morphogenesis did not occur. When these epithelia were recombined with homotypic mesenchyme and transplanted, the epithelia proliferated remarkably on one side of the wall of the pouch, resulting in formation of a pars distalis that contained both ACTH-producing cells and prolactin-producing cells. Heterotypic mesenchyme, such as lung, dermis and mammary gland mesenchyme, could induce 12-day epithelium, but not 10-day epithelium to develop into pars distalis. Thus, fetal pituitary epithelium has the capacity of autodifferentiation into ACTH-producing cells, not into prolactin-producing cells, and requires mesenchymal support for development of the pars distalis.     

Role of Islet1 in the patterning of murine dentition

It is believed that mouse dentition is determined by a prepatterning of the oral epithelium into molar (proximal) and incisor (distal) regions. The LIM homeodomain protein Islet1 (ISL1) is involved in the regulation of differentiation of many cell types and organs. During odontogenesis, we find Islet1 to be exclusively expressed in epithelial cells of the developing incisors but not during molar development. Early expression of Islet1 in presumptive incisor epithelium is coincident with expression of Bmp4, which acts to induce Msx1 expression in the underlying mesenchyme. To define the role of ISL1 in the acquisition of incisor shape, we have analysed regulation of Islet1 expression in mandibular explants. Local application of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) in the epithelium of molar territories either by bead implantation or by electroporation stimulated Islet1 expression. Inhibition of BMP signalling with Noggin resulted in a loss of Islet1 expression. Inhibition of Islet1 in distal epithelium resulted in a loss of Bmp4 expression and a corresponding loss of Msx1 expression, indicating that a positive regulatory loop exists between ISL1 and BMP4 in distal epithelium. Ectopic expression of Islet1 in proximal epithelium produces a loss of Barx1 expression in the mesenchyme and resulted in inhibition of molar tooth development. Using epithelial/mesenchymal recombinations we show that at E10.5 Islet1 expression is independent of the underlying mesenchyme whereas at E12.5 when tooth shape specification has passed to the mesenchyme, Islet1 expression requires distal (presumptive incisor) mesenchyme. Islet1 thus plays an important role in regulating distal gene expression during jaw and tooth development.     

Mesenchyme-dependent BMP signaling directs the timing of mandibular osteogenesis

To identify molecular and cellular mechanisms that determine when bone forms, and to elucidate the role played by osteogenic mesenchyme, we employed an avian chimeric system that draws upon the divergent embryonic maturation rates of quail and duck. Pre-migratory neural crest mesenchyme destined to form bone in the mandible was transplanted from quail to duck. In resulting chimeras, quail donor mesenchyme established significantly faster molecular and histological programs for osteogenesis within the relatively slower-progressing duck host environment. To understand this phenotype, we assayed for changes in the timing of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions required for bone formation and found that such interactions were accelerated in chimeras. In situ hybridization analyses uncovered donor-dependent changes in the spatiotemporal expression of genes, including the osteo-inductive growth factor Bmp4. Mesenchymal expression of Bmp4 correlated with an ability of quail donor cells to form bone precociously without duck host epithelium, and also relied upon epithelial interactions until mesenchyme could form bone independently. Treating control mandibles with exogenous BMP4 recapitulated the capacity of chimeras to express molecular mediators of osteogenesis prematurely and led to the early differentiation of bone. Inhibiting BMP signaling delayed bone formation in a stage-dependent manner that was accelerated in chimeras. Thus, mandibular mesenchyme dictates when bone forms by temporally regulating its interactions with epithelium and its own expression of Bmp4. Our findings offer a developmental mechanism to explain how neural crest-derived mesenchyme and BMP signaling underlie the evolution of species-specific skeletal morphology.