A precursor-specific role for Hsp40/Hsc70 during tail-anchored protein integration at the endoplasmic reticulum

Tail-anchored (TA) protein synthesis at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) represents a distinct and novel process that provides a paradigm for understanding post-translational membrane insertion in eukaryotes. The major route for delivering TA proteins to the ER requires both ATP and one or more cytosolic factors that facilitate efficient membrane insertion. Until recently, the identity of these cytosolic components was elusive, but two candidates have now been suggested to promote ATP-dependent TA protein integration. The first is the cytosolic chaperone complex of Hsp40/Hsc70, and the second is a novel ATPase denoted Asna-1 or TRC40. In this study we focus on the role of the Hsp40/Hsc70 complex in promoting TA protein biogenesis at the ER. We show that the membrane integration of most TA proteins is stimulated by Hsp40/Hsc70 when using purified components and a reconstituted system. In contrast, when both Hsp40/Hsc70 and Asna-1/TRC40 are provided as a complete system, small molecule inhibition of Hsp40/Hsc70 indicates that only a subset of TA proteins are obligatory clients for this chaperone-mediated delivery route. We show that the hydrophobicity of the TA region dictates whether a precursor is delivered to the ER via the Hsp40/Hsc70 or Asna-1/TRC40-dependent route, and we conclude that these distinct cytosolic ATPases are responsible for two different ATP-dependent pathways of TA protein biogenesis.     

Identification of a targeting factor for posttranslational membrane protein insertion into the ER

Hundreds of proteins are anchored in intracellular membranes by a single transmembrane domain (TMD) close to the C terminus. Although these tail-anchored (TA) proteins serve numerous essential roles in cells, components of their targeting and insertion pathways have long remained elusive. Here we reveal a cytosolic TMD recognition complex (TRC) that targets TA proteins for insertion into the ER membrane. The highly conserved, 40 kDa ATPase subunit of TRC (which we termed TRC40) was identified as Asna-1. TRC40/Asna-1 interacts posttranslationally with TA proteins in a TMD-dependent manner for delivery to a proteinaceous receptor at the ER membrane. Subsequent release from TRC40/Asna-1 and insertion into the membrane depends on ATP hydrolysis. Consequently, an ATPase-deficient mutant of TRC40/Asna-1 dominantly inhibited TA protein insertion selectively without influencing other translocation pathways. Thus, TRC40/Asna-1 represents an integral component of a posttranslational pathway of membrane protein insertion whose targeting is mediated by TRC.     

Discrimination between the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria by spontaneously inserting tail‐anchored proteins

Tail‐anchored (TA) proteins insert into their target organelles by incompletely elucidated posttranslational pathways. Some TA proteins spontaneously insert into protein‐free liposomes, yet target a specific organelle in vivo. Two spontaneously inserting cytochrome b5 forms, b5‐ER and b5‐RR, which differ only in the charge of the C‐terminal region, target the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM), respectively. To bridge the gap between the cell‐free and in cellula results, we analyzed targeting in digitonin‐permeabilized adherent HeLa cells. In the absence of cytosol, the MOM was the destination of both b5 forms, whereas in cytosol the C‐terminal negative charge of b5‐ER determined targeting to the ER. Inhibition of the transmembrane recognition complex (TRC) pathway only partially reduced b5 targeting, while strongly affecting the classical TRC substrate synaptobrevin 2 (Syb2). To identify additional pathways, we tested a number of small inhibitors, and found that Eeyarestatin I (ES_I) reduced insertion of b5‐ER and of another spontaneously inserting TA protein, while not affecting Syb2. The effect was independent from the known targets of ES_I, Sec61 and p97/VCP. Our results demonstrate that the MOM is the preferred destination of spontaneously inserting TA proteins, regardless of their C‐terminal charge, and reveal a novel, substrate‐specific ER‐targeting pathway.      

A conserved archaeal pathway for tail-anchored membrane protein insertion

Eukaryotic tail‐anchored (TA) membrane proteins are inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum by a post‐translational TRC40 pathway, but no comparable pathway is known in other domains of life. The crystal structure of an archaebacterial TRC40 sequence homolog bound to ADP?AlF₄^? reveals characteristic features of eukaryotic TRC40, including a zinc‐mediated dimer and a large hydrophobic groove. Moreover, archaeal TRC40 interacts with the transmembrane domain of TA substrates and directs their membrane insertion. Thus, the TRC40 pathway is more broadly conserved than previously recognized.     

Deubiquitinases USP20/33 promote the biogenesis of tail-anchored membrane proteins

Numerous proteins that have hydrophobic transmembrane domains (TMDs) traverse the cytosol and posttranslationally insert into cellular membranes. It is unclear how these hydrophobic membrane proteins evade recognition by the cytosolic protein quality control (PQC), which typically recognizes exposed hydrophobicity in misfolded proteins and marks them for proteasomal degradation by adding ubiquitin chains. Here, we find that tail-anchored (TA) proteins, a vital class of membrane proteins, are recognized by cytosolic PQC and are ubiquitinated as soon as they are synthesized in cells. Surprisingly, the ubiquitinated TA proteins are not routed for proteasomal degradation but instead are handed over to the targeting factor, TRC40, and delivered to the ER for insertion. The ER-associated deubiquitinases, USP20 and USP33, remove ubiquitin chains from TA proteins after their insertion into the ER. Thus, our data suggest that deubiquitinases rescue posttranslationally targeted membrane proteins that are inappropriately ubiquitinated by PQC in the cytosol.     

The Brl domain in Sec63p is required for assembly of functional endoplasmic reticulum translocons

Protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum occurs at pore-forming structures known as translocons. In yeast, two different targeting pathways converge at a translocation pore formed by the Sec61 complex. The signal recognition particle-dependent pathway targets nascent precursors co-translationally, whereas the Sec62p-dependent pathway targets polypeptides post-translationally. In addition to the Sec61 complex, both pathways also require Sec63p, an integral membrane protein of the Hsp40 family, and Kar2p, a soluble Hsp70 located in the ER lumen. Using a series of mutant alleles, we demonstrate that a conserved Brl (Brr2-like) domain in the COOH-terminal cytosolic region of Sec63p is essential for function both in vivo and in vitro. We further demonstrate that this domain is required for assembly of two oligomeric complexes of 350 and 380 kDa, respectively. The larger of these corresponds to the heptameric "SEC complex" required for post-translational translocation. However, the 350-kDa complex represents a newly defined hexameric SEC' complex comprising Sec61p, Sss1p, Sbh1p, Sec63p, Sec71p, and Sec72p. Our data indicate that the SEC' complex is required for co-translational protein translocation across the yeast ER membrane.     

EBV protein BNLF2a exploits host tail-anchored protein integration machinery to inhibit TAP

EBV, the prototypic human γ(1)-herpesvirus, persists for life in infected individuals, despite the presence of vigorous antiviral immunity. CTLs play an important role in the protection against viral infections, which they detect through recognition of virus-encoded peptides presented in the context of HLA class I molecules at the cell surface. The viral peptides are generated in the cytosol and are transported into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by TAP. The EBV-encoded lytic-phase protein BNLF2a acts as a powerful inhibitor of TAP. Consequently, loading of antigenic peptides onto HLA class I molecules is hampered, and recognition of BNLF2a-expressing cells by cytotoxic T cells is avoided. In this study, we characterize BNLF2a as a tail-anchored (TA) protein and elucidate its mode of action. Its hydrophilic N-terminal domain is located in the cytosol, whereas its hydrophobic C-terminal domain is inserted into membranes posttranslationally. TAP has no role in membrane insertion of BNLF2a. Instead, Asna1 (also named TRC40), a cellular protein involved in posttranslational membrane insertion of TA proteins, is responsible for integration of BNLF2a into the ER membrane. Asna1 is thereby required for efficient BNLF2a-mediated HLA class I downregulation. To optimally accomplish immune evasion, BNLF2a is composed of two specialized domains: its C-terminal tail anchor ensures membrane integration and ER retention, whereas its cytosolic N terminus accomplishes inhibition of TAP function. These results illustrate how EBV exploits a cellular pathway for TA protein biogenesis to achieve immune evasion, and they highlight the exquisite adaptation of this virus to its host.     

Tail-anchored and signal-anchored proteins utilize overlapping pathways during membrane insertion

Tail-anchored proteins are a distinct class of membrane proteins that are characterized by a C-terminal membrane insertion sequence and a capacity for post-translational integration. Although it is now clear that tail-anchored proteins are inserted into the membrane at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the molecular basis for their integration is poorly understood. We have used a cross-linking approach to identify ER components that may be involved in the membrane insertion of tail-anchored proteins. We find that several newly synthesized tail-anchored proteins are transiently associated with a defined subset of cellular components. Among these, we identify several ER proteins, including subunits of the Sec61 translocon, Sec62p, Sec63p, and the 25-kDa subunit of the signal peptidase complex. When we analyze the cotranslational membrane insertion of a comparable signal-anchored protein we find the nascent polypeptide associated with a similar set of ER components. We conclude that the pathways for the integration of tail-anchored and signal-anchored membrane proteins at the ER exhibit a substantial degree of overlap, and we propose that this reflects similarities between co- and post-translational membrane insertion.     

Tryptophan‐rich basic protein (WRB) mediates insertion of the tail‐anchored protein otoferlin and is required for hair cell exocytosis and hearing

The transmembrane recognition complex (TRC40) pathway mediates the insertion of tail‐anchored (TA) proteins into membranes. Here, we demonstrate that otoferlin, a TA protein essential for hair cell exocytosis, is inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via the TRC40 pathway. We mutated the TRC40 receptor tryptophan‐rich basic protein (Wrb) in hair cells of zebrafish and mice and studied the impact of defective TA protein insertion. Wrb disruption reduced otoferlin levels in hair cells and impaired hearing, which could be restored in zebrafish by transgenic Wrb rescue and otoferlin overexpression. Wrb‐deficient mouse inner hair cells (IHCs) displayed normal numbers of afferent synapses, Ca²⁺ channels, and membrane‐proximal vesicles, but contained fewer ribbon‐associated vesicles. Patch‐clamp of IHCs revealed impaired synaptic vesicle replenishment. In vivo recordings from postsynaptic spiral ganglion neurons showed a use‐dependent reduction in sound‐evoked spiking, corroborating the notion of impaired IHC vesicle replenishment. A human mutation affecting the transmembrane domain of otoferlin impaired its ER targeting and caused an auditory synaptopathy. We conclude that the TRC40 pathway is critical for hearing and propose that otoferlin is an essential substrate of this pathway in hair cells.     

Protein transport into canine pancreatic microsomes: a quantitative approach.

Transport of presecretory proteins into the mammalian rough endoplasmic reticulum involves a protein translocase that comprises the integral membrane proteins Sec61alphap, Sec61betap, and Sec61gammap as core components. Electron microscopic analysis of protein translocase in rough microsomal membranes suggested that between three and four heterotrimeric Sec61p complexes form the central unit of protein translocase. Here we analyzed the stoichiometry of heterotrimeric Sec61p complexes present in cotranslationally active protein translocases of canine pancreatic microsomes and various other lumenal and membrane components believed to be subunits of protein translocase and to be involved in covalent modifications. Based on these numbers, the capacity for cotranslational transport was estimated for the endoplasmic reticulum of the human pancreas.     

Cooperation of transmembrane segments during the integration of a double-spanning protein into the ER membrane

While membrane insertion of single-spanning membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is relatively well understood, it is unclear how multi-spanning proteins integrate. We have investigated the cotranslational ER integration of a double-spanning protein that is derived from leader peptidase. Both transmembrane (TM) segments are inserted into the membrane by the Sec61 channel. While the first, long and hydrophobic TM segment (TM1) inserts into the lipid bilayer on its own, the second, shorter TM anchor (TM2) collaborates with TM1 during its integration. TM1 diffuses away from the Sec61 complex in the absence of TM2, but is close to Sec61 when TM2 arrives inside the channel. These data suggest that the exit of a weak TM segment from the Sec61 channel into the lipid phase can be facilitated by its interaction with a previously integrated strong and stabilizing TM anchor.     

Structural and Functional Profiling of the Lateral Gate of the Sec61 Translocon

The evolutionarily conserved Sec61 translocon mediates the translocation and membrane insertion of proteins. For the integration of proteins into the membrane, the Sec61 translocon opens laterally to the lipid bilayer. Previous studies suggest that the lateral opening of the channel is mediated by the helices TM2b and TM7 of a pore-forming subunit of the Sec61 translocon. To map key residues in TM2b and TM7 in yeast Sec61 that modulate lateral gating activity, we performed alanine scanning and in vivo site-directed photocross-linking experiments. Alanine scanning identified two groups of critical residues in the lateral gate, one group that leads to defects in the translocation and membrane insertion of proteins and the other group that causes faster translocation and facilitates membrane insertion. Photocross-linking data show that the former group of residues is located at the interface of the lateral gate. Furthermore, different degrees of defects for the membrane insertion of single- and double-spanning membrane proteins were observed depending on whether the mutations were located in TM2b or TM7. These results demonstrate subtle differences in the molecular mechanism of the signal sequence binding/opening of the lateral gate and membrane insertion of a succeeding transmembrane segment in a polytopic membrane protein.     

Expression level of Sec62 modulates membrane insertion of marginally hydrophobic segments

In the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, transmembrane (TM) domain insertion occurs through the Sec61 channel with its auxiliary components, including Sec62. Sec62 interacts with the Sec61 channel and is located on the front side of the Sec61 lateral gate, an entry site for TM domains to the lipid bilayer. Overexpression of Sec62 led to a growth defect in yeast, and we investigated its effects on protein translocation and membrane insertion by pulse labeling of Sec62 client proteins. Our data show that the insertion efficiency of marginally hydrophobic TM segments is reduced upon Sec62 overexpression. This result suggests a potential regulatory role of Sec62 as a gatekeeper of the lateral gate, thereby modulating the insertion threshold of TM segments.     

Binding of Signal Recognition Particle Gives Ribosome/Nascent Chain Complexes a Competitive Advantage in Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane Interaction

Most secretory and membrane proteins are sorted by signal sequences to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane early during their synthesis. Targeting of the ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC) involves the binding of the signal sequence to the signal recognition particle (SRP), followed by an interaction of ribosome-bound SRP with the SRP receptor. However, ribosomes can also independently bind to the ER translocation channel formed by the Sec61p complex. To explain the specificity of membrane targeting, it has therefore been proposed that nascent polypeptide-associated complex functions as a cytosolic inhibitor of signal sequence- and SRP-independent ribosome binding to the ER membrane. We report here that SRP-independent binding of RNCs to the ER membrane can occur in the presence of all cytosolic factors, including nascent polypeptide-associated complex. Nontranslating ribosomes competitively inhibit SRP-independent membrane binding of RNCs but have no effect when SRP is bound to the RNCs. The protective effect of SRP against ribosome competition depends on a functional signal sequence in the nascent chain and is also observed with reconstituted proteoliposomes containing only the Sec61p complex and the SRP receptor. We conclude that cytosolic factors do not prevent the membrane binding of ribosomes. Instead, specific ribosome targeting to the Sec61p complex is provided by the binding of SRP to RNCs, followed by an interaction with the SRP receptor, which gives RNC–SRP complexes a selective advantage in membrane targeting over nontranslating ribosomes.     

WRB and CAML Are Necessary and Sufficient to Mediate Tail-Anchored Protein Targeting to the ER Membrane

Tail-Anchored (TA) proteins are inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane of yeast cells via the posttranslational Guided Entry of Tail-Anchored protein (GET) pathway. The key component of this targeting machinery is the ATPase Get3 that docks to the ER membrane by interacting with a receptor complex formed by the proteins Get1 and Get2. A conserved pathway is present in higher eukaryotes and is mediated by TRC40, homolog of Get3, and the recently identified membrane receptors WRB and CAML. Here, we used yeast lacking the GET1 and GET2 genes and substituted them with WRB and CAML. This rescued the growth phenotypes of the GET receptor mutant. We demonstrate that WRB and CAML efficiently recruit Get3 to the ER membrane and promote the targeting of the TA proteins in vivo. Our results show that the membrane spanning segments of CAML are essential to create a functional receptor with WRB and to ensure TA protein membrane insertion. Finally, we determined the binding parameters of TRC40 to the WRB/CAML receptor. We conclude that together, WRB and CAML are not only necessary but also sufficient to create a functional membrane receptor complex for TRC40. The yeast complementation assay can be used to further dissect the structure-function relationship of the WRB/CAML heteromultimer in the absence of endogenous receptor proteins.     

A TRCky TA protein delivery service snubs the UPS

In mammals, tail-anchored (TA) proteins that are posttranslationally captured by the chaperone SGTA are triaged by the BAG6 complex into one of two fates: handoff to an ER targeting factor for membrane insertion or polyubiquitination for destruction by the proteasome. In this issue, Culver and Mariappan (2021. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202004086) show that a fraction of newly synthesized TA proteins is polyubiquitinated in HEK293 cells independently of the BAG6 complex yet evades proteasomal degradation by undergoing deubiquitination en route to becoming stably inserted into the ER membrane.

Nascent membrane proteins must avoid aggregation of their hydrophobic transmembrane domains (TMDs) in the aqueous cytosol before insertion into the lipid bilayer. Signal recognition particle (SRP) solves this problem for the majority of membrane proteins destined for the secretory pathway by shielding their N-terminal hydrophobic regions shortly after they emerge from the ribosome exit tunnel. SRP also pauses translation until the ribosome is directed to the ER protein translocation channel Sec61, such that subsequently synthesized TMDs reach the lipid bilayer with minimal exposure to the cytosol. By contrast, the single C-terminal TMD of tail-anchored (TA) proteins emerges from the ribosome exit tunnel after translation has terminated, necessitating a distinct pathway for posttranslational TA protein targeting and insertion into the ER membrane. In mammals, this is accomplished by the TMD recognition complex (TRC) pathway comprising chaperones, an ER targeting factor, and a dual ER transmembrane receptor and insertase (Fig. 1; 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.How TA protein biogenesis is embedded within the UPS. (A) In the canonical model, TA proteins that fail to be transferred to TRC40 are captured by BAG6 and polyubiquitinated by RNF126 prior to proteasomal degradation. (B) The work of Culver and Mariappan supports an alternative model in which polyubiquitination of TA proteins by undefined E3 ligase(s) occurs earlier in their biogenesis but does not preclude capture by TRC40 or insertion into the ER by WRB/CAML. Undefined DUBs counteract the E3 activity at many steps prior to insertion, after which USP20/33 finally removes all residual ubiquitin.The initial fate of TA proteins as they emerge from the ribosome exit tunnel has been an area of intense investigation over the past decade. Early attempts at identifying the pre-targeting factors in mammalian cells led to a model in which a complex containing BAG6, TRC35, and Ubl4A is recruited to the ribosome to chaperone emerging TA proteins and direct them to the ER targeting factor TRC40 (2, 3). Subsequent work demonstrated that the chaperone SGTA (small glutamine-rich tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein α) captures nascent TA proteins prior to interaction with the BAG6 complex, which scaffolds the SGTA–TA complex, TRC40, and the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF126 (4, 5, 6). At this stage, the destiny of TA proteins can be bifurcated: either they are successfully transferred to TRC40, thus committing them for targeting to the ER membrane and insertion by tryptophan-rich basic protein and calcium-modulating cyclophilin ligand (WRB/CAML; the TRC40 receptor and TMD insertase), or they are handed over to BAG6 for polyubiquitination by RNF126, leading to their proteasomal degradation (5). SGTA is additionally thought to regulate degradation of TA proteins by antagonizing BAG6-mediated ubiquitination (7).Notably, the work that identified the mechanism by which BAG6 helps TRC40 avoid substrate overload relied mostly on in vitro systems but didn’t explore fully the cell dynamics of nascent TA proteins with the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS; 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). In this issue, Culver and Mariappan use a series of cell-based assays to demonstrate that following synthesis a fraction of TA proteins gets modified with K48-linked polyubiquitin chains in the cytosol yet fails to be destroyed as a typical UPS substrate (8). Surprisingly, this fraction was neither affected by the presence of excess SGTA nor the absence of BAG6. Even more heretically for the elegant triage view by which the TRC pathway intersects with the UPS, the polyubiquitinated fraction was competent for interaction with TRC40 and became successfully inserted into the ER membrane. Finally, the authors showed that some TA protein deubiquitination occurs concomitantly with insertion and identified a pair of ER-localized deubiquitinases (DUBs), USP20 and USP33, that are necessary and sufficient to fully complete pruning after insertion has taken place.The identity of the ubiquitination machinery defined by this work remains unknown, which raises questions about its mechanism and logic. The authors detect that ~8% of nascent TA proteins become polyubiquitinated dependent on the presence of a TMD, but acknowledge that polyubiquitination should occur on the cytosolic domains of TA proteins whose TMDs lack lysine residues. However, it’s unclear if the ubiquitination machinery has a bona fide TMD-recognition factor (akin to BAG6) or instead engages clients with more eclectic hydrophobic regions. Indeed, around 12–15% of all nascent polypeptides are co-translationally ubiquitinated in HEK293T cells (9). Thus, a parsimonious working model would be that the TMD of a polyubiquitinated TA protein still enables rapid transit along the TRC pathway all the way to the ER DUBs at the end of the line. Such a sequence of events makes for a messier textbook picture, but might allow for more efficient biogenesis of TA proteins than when innocent bystanders are destroyed.Is reversible polyubiquitination genuinely futile or part of an as yet undefined quality control system? The authors speculate that ubiquitination of nascent TA proteins could serve to cage their soluble domains against promiscuous interactions or activity en route to their final destinations. Future identification of the E3 ligase(s) responsible will provide a much-needed handle for testing this idea and other whimsical possibilities. Going beyond HEK293T cells might of course also reveal a cellular context in which this TA protein ubiquitination process leads to a degradation fate.Lastly, it will be important to identify the DUBs that apparently generate trimmed TA protein substrates for USP22/30. Is their DUB activity coupled to earlier steps of the TRC pathway or simply coincident with TA protein targeting and insertion? More broadly, the work of Culver and Mariappan illustrates the power of “old-school” cell-based approaches to reveal new insights into membrane protein biogenesis. Running their playbook against posttranslational membrane protein targeting pathways to mitochondria and peroxisomes will either extend their dynamic ubiquitination view into a paradigm or at the very least require that we turn another textbook picture on a dime.     

Identification of MarvelD3 as a tight junction-associated transmembrane protein of the occludin family

Background

Protein translocation across the membrane of the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) is the first step in the biogenesis of secretory and membrane proteins. Proteins enter the ER by the Sec61 translocon, a proteinaceous channel composed of three subunits, α, β and γ. While it is known that Sec61α forms the actual channel, the function of the other two subunits remains to be characterized.

Results

In the present study we have investigated the function of Sec61β in Drosophila melanogaster. We describe its role in the plasma membrane traffic of Gurken, the ligand for the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) receptor in the oocyte. Germline clones of the mutant allele of Sec61β show normal translocation of Gurken into the ER and transport to the Golgi complex, but further traffic to the plasma membrane is impeded. The defect in plasma membrane traffic due to absence of Sec61β is specific for Gurken and is not due to a general trafficking defect.

Conclusion

Based on our study we conclude that Sec61β, which is part of the ER protein translocation channel affects a post-ER step during Gurken trafficking to the plasma membrane. We propose an additional role of Sec61β beyond protein translocation into the ER.     

Calmodulin regulation of the calcium-leak channel Sec61 is unique to vertebrates

In eukaryotes, protein transport into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is facilitated by a protein-conducting channel, the Sec61 complex. The presence of large, water-filled pores with uncontrolled ion permeability, such as those formed by Sec61 complexes in the ER membrane, would interfere with the regulated release of calcium from the ER lumen into the cytosol, an essential mechanism of intracellular signaling. We identified a calmodulin (CaM) binding motif in the cytosolic N-terminus of Sec61α from Canis familiaris that binds CaM, but not Ca(2+)-free apo-CaM, with nanomolar affinity and sequence specificity. In single channel lipid bilayer measurements, CaM potently mediated Sec61-channel closure in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. No functional CaM binding motif was identified in the corresponding region of Sec61p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and no channel closure occurred in the presence of CaM and Ca(2+). Therefore, CaM binding to the cytosolic N-terminus of Sec61α is involved in limiting Ca(2+)-leakage from the ER in C. familiaris but not S. cerevisiae.     

Post-translational membrane insertion of tail-anchored transmembrane EF-hand Ca2+ sensor calneurons requires the TRC40/Asna1 protein chaperone

Calneuron-1 and -2 are neuronal EF-hand-type calcium sensor proteins that are prominently targeted to trans-Golgi network membranes and impose a calcium threshold at the Golgi for phosphatidylinositol 4-OH kinase IIIβ activation and the regulated local synthesis of phospholipids that are crucial for TGN-to-plasma membrane trafficking. In this study, we show that calneurons are nonclassical type II tail-anchored proteins that are post-translationally inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane via an association of a 23-amino acid-long transmembrane domain (TMD) with the TRC40/Asna1 chaperone complex. Following trafficking to the Golgi, calneurons are probably retained in the TGN because of the length of the TMD and phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate lipid binding. Both calneurons rapidly self-associate in vitro and in vivo via their TMD and EF-hand containing the N terminus. Although dimerization and potentially multimerization precludes TRC40/Asna1 binding and thereby membrane insertion, we found no evidence for a cytosolic pool of calneurons and could demonstrate that self-association of calneurons is restricted to membrane-inserted protein. The dimerization properties and the fact that they, unlike every other EF-hand calmodulin-like Ca(2+) sensor, are always associated with membranes of the secretory pathway, including vesicles and plasma membrane, suggests a high degree of spatial segregation for physiological target interactions.     

In vitro binding of ribosomes to the beta subunit of the Sec61p protein translocation complex

The Sec61p complex forms the core element of the protein translocation complex (translocon) in the rough endoplasmic reticulum (rough ER) membrane. Translating or nontranslating ribosomes bind with high affinity to ER membranes that have been stripped of ribosomes or to liposomes containing purified Sec61p. Here we present evidence that the beta subunit of the complex (Sec61beta) makes contact with nontranslating ribosomes. A fusion protein containing the Sec61beta cytoplasmic domain (Sec61beta(c)) prevents the binding of ribosomes to stripped ER-derived membranes and also binds to ribosomes directly with an affinity close to the affinity of ribosomes for stripped ER-derived membranes. The ribosome binding activity of Sec61beta(c), like that of native ER membranes, is sensitive to high salt concentrations and is not based on an unspecific charge-dependent interaction of the relatively basic Sec61beta(c) domain with ribosomal RNA. Like stripped ER membranes, the Sec61beta(c) sequence binds to large ribosomal subunits in preference over small subunits. Previous studies have shown that Sec61beta is inessential for ribosome binding and protein translocation, but translocation is impaired by the absence of Sec61beta, and it has been proposed that Sec61beta assists in the insertion of nascent proteins into the translocation pore. Our results suggest a physical interaction of the ribosome itself with Sec61beta; this may normally occur alongside interactions between the ribosome and other elements of Sec61p, or it may represent one stage in a temporal sequence of binding.