Design and analysis of experiments on mutagenicity : I. Minimal sample sizes

The probability (power) of collecting sufficient data to demonstrate statistically that a chemical is mutagenic is examined. A formula is derived with which one may calculate the likelihood of correctly concluding a chemical is mutagenic based upon (1) the total sample size, (2) the relative size of the experimental group, (3) the spontaneous mutation rate and (4) the minimal increase in mutation rate that one is concerned in detecting. Figures are also presented which allow one to determine the minimal total sample size required to assure oneself a reasonable chance of successfully demonstrating a chemical to be mutagenic.

It is found that the best designed (most powerful) experiments are those with approximately equal numbers of indviduals in the experimental and control groups. Those experiments in which excess numbers of individuals are allotted to either the experimental or control groups suffer a substantial reduction in power. In addition, caution should be exercised when concluding that a chemical is not mutagenic. The inability to collect sufficient data to demonstrate the mutagenicity of a chemical might be attributable to one's using too small a total sample size rather than to lack of mutagenic activity, especially in mutagenicity assay systems involving very small spontaneous mutation rates.     

Phage T7-inactivation test. A possibility of quantitative mutagenicity screening

A new method is described for the quantitative characterization of the genotoxic effect of chemicals. The method is based on the determination of the inactivation of bacteriophage T7 and on the application of a simple mathematical model valid for the processes during, or at least in the initial stage of the interaction of chemicals and phages. A value characteristic for the chemical is defined and it is determined from the inactivation kinetics. Typical inactivation kinetic curves and some problems of the application of the model as well as the mutagenicity index values determined for about 30 substances are presented. The substances examined have mutagenicity index values covering a range of six orders of magnitude. The obtained values are compared with the results of different mutagenicity/carcinogenicity tests and discussed on the basis of data in the literature. The presented method is proposed to be applied for quantitative mutagenicity screening of chemicals.     

Considerations in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's testing approach for mutagenicity.

OPP: This paper provides the rationale and support for the decisions the OPP will make in requiring and reviewing mutagenicity information. The regulatory requirement for mutagenicity testing to support a pesticide registration is found in the 40 CFR Part 158. The guidance as to the specific mutagenicity testing to be performed is found in the OPP's Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision F, Hazard Evaluation: Human and Domestic Animals (referred to as the Subdivision F guideline). A revised Subdivision F guideline has been presented that becomes the current guidance for submitters of mutagenicity data to the OPP. The decision to revise the guideline was the result of close examination of the version published in 1982 and the desire to update the guidance based on developments since then and current state-of-the-science. After undergoing Agency and public scrutiny, the revised guideline is to be published in 1991. The revised guideline consists of an initial battery of tests (the Salmonella assay, an in vitro mammalian gene mutation assay and an in vivo cytogenetics assay which may be either a bone marrow assay for chromosomal aberrations or for micronuclei formation) that should provide an adequate initial assessment of the potential mutagenicity of a chemical. Follow-up testing to clarify results from the initial testing may be necessary. After this information as well as all other relevant information is obtained, a weight-of-evidence decision will be made about the possible mutagenicity concern a chemical may present. Testing to pursue qualitative and/or quantitative evidence for assessing heritable risk in relation to human beings will then be considered if a mutagenicity concern exists. This testing may range from tests for evidence of gonadal exposure to dominant lethal testing to quantitative tests such as the specific locus and heritable translocation assays. The mutagenicity assessment will be performed in accordance with the Agency's Mutagenicity Risk Assessment Guidelines. The mutagenicity data would also be used in the weight-of-evidence consideration for the potential carcinogenicity of a chemical in accordance with the Agency's Carcinogen Risk Assessment Guidelines. In instances where there are triggers for carcinogenicity testing, mutagenicity data may be used as one of the triggers after a consideration of available information. It is felt that the revised Subdivision F guideline will provide appropriate, and more specific, guidance concerning the OPP approach to mutagenicity testing for the registration of a pesticide. It also provides a clearer understanding of how the OPP will proceed with its evaluation and decision making concerning the potential heritable effects of a test chemical.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Development of new structural alerts suitable for chemical category formation for assigning covalent and non-covalent mechanisms relevant to DNA binding

The need to assess the ability of a chemical to act as a mutagen is one of the primary requirements in regulatory toxicology. Several pieces of legislation have led to an increased interest in the use of in silico methods, specifically the formation of chemical categories and read-across for the assessment of toxicological endpoints. One of the key steps in the development of chemical categories for mutagenicity is defining the mechanistic organic chemistry associated with the formation of a covalent bond between DNA and an exogenous chemical. To this end this study has analysed, by use of a large set of mutagenicity data (Ames test), the mechanistic coverage of a recently published set of in silico structural alerts developed for category formation. The results show that the majority of chemicals with a positive result in the Ames test were assigned at least one covalent binding mechanism related to the formation of a DNA adduct. The remaining chemicals with positive data in the Ames assay were subjected to a detailed mechanistic analysis from which 26 new structural alerts relating to covalent binding mechanisms were developed. In addition, structural alerts for radical and non-covalent intercalation mechanisms were also defined. The structural alerts outlined in this study are not intended to predict mutagenicity but rather to identify mechanisms associated with covalent and non-covalent DNA binding. This mechanistic profiling information can then be used to form chemical categories suitable for filling data gaps via read-across. A strategy for chemical category formation for mutagenicity is also presented.     

A two-stage test for ordered means in the poisson case with an example from mutagenicity testing

It is shown how two-stage methods developed for continuous distributions can be used to construct two-stage tests for certain hypotheses pertaining to discrete distributions. Specifically, a two-stage test for ordered means in the Poisson case is presented. An example from mutagenicity testing is discussed and data from it are used to illustrate the methodology. Results of a Monte Carlo power study are presented as well as a brief table of critical values.     

The mutagenic activity and structure of pesticides

The data on mutagenicity of pesticides as to their chemical structure are summarized and discussed. The results from investigation of cytogenetic action of 55 pesticides and their metabolites in somatic human and animal cells are presented. Some structure fragments of molecule related to genotoxic effects are selected.     

Structure-based methods for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity: are we there yet?

There is a great deal of current interest in the use of commercial, automated programs for the prediction of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity based on chemical structure. However, the goal of accurate and reliable toxicity prediction for any chemical, based solely on structural information remains elusive. The toxicity prediction challenge is global in its objective, but limited in its solution, to within local domains of chemicals acting according to similar mechanisms of action in the biological system; to predict, we must be able to generalize based on chemical structure, but the biology fundamentally limits our ability to do so. Available commercial systems for mutagenicity and/or carcinogenicity prediction differ in their specifics, yet most fall in two major categories: (1) automated approaches that rely on the use of statistics for extracting correlations between structure and activity; and (2) knowledge-based expert systems that rely on a set of programmed rules distilled from available knowledge and human expert judgement. These two categories of approaches differ in the ways that they represent, process, and generalize chemical-biological activity information. An application of four commercial systems (TOPKAT, CASE/MULTI-CASE, DEREK, and OncoLogic) to mutagenicity and carcinogenicity prediction for a particular class of chemicals—the haloacetic acids (HAs)—is presented to highlight these differences. Some discussion is devoted to the issue of gauging the relative performance of commercial prediction systems, as well as to the role of prospective prediction exercises in this effort. And finally, an alternative approach that stops short of delivering a prediction to a user, involving structure-searching and data base exploration, is briefly considered.     

A survey of EPA/OPP and open literature on selected pesticide chemicals. II. Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of selected chloroacetanilides and related compounds.

With this effort, we continue our examination of data on selected pesticide chemicals and their related analogues that have been presented to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP). This report focuses on a group of selected chloroacetanilides and a few related compounds. As part of the registration process for pesticidal chemicals, interested parties (registrants) must submit toxicity information to support the registration including both mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. Although this information is available to the public via Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to the OPP, publication in the scientific literature allows greater dissemination and examination of the data. For this Special Issue, graphic profiles have been prepared of the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data available in the submissions to OPP. Also, a discussion is presented about how toxicity data are used to help establish tolerances (limits of pesticide residues in foods). The mutagenicity results submitted by registrants are supplemented by data on these chemicals from the open literature to provide a full perspective of their genetic toxicology. The group of chloroacetanilides reviewed here display a consistent pattern of mutagenic activity, probably mediated via metabolites. This mutagenic activity is a mechanistically plausible factor in the development of tumors seen in experimental animals exposed to this class of chemicals.     

Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP.

An analysis is presented in which are evaluated correlations among chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella, and carcinogenicity to rats and mice among 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP. Overall, there was a high correlation between structural alerts to DNA reactivity and mutagenicity, but the correlation of either property with carcinogenicity was low. If rodent carcinogenicity is regarded as a singular property of chemicals, then neither structural alerts nor mutagenicity to Salmonella are effective in its prediction. Given this, the database was fragmented and new correlations sought between the derived sub-groups. First, the 301 chemicals were segregated into six broad chemical groupings. Second, the rodent cancer data were partially segregated by target tissue. Using the previously assigned structural alerts to DNA reactivity (electrophilicity), the chemicals were split into 154 alerting chemicals and 147 non-alerting chemicals. The alerting chemicals were split into three chemical groups; aromatic amino/nitro-types, alkylating agents and miscellaneous structurally-alerting groups. The non-alerting chemicals were subjectively split into three broad categories; non-alerting, non-alerting containing a non-reactive halogen group, and non-alerting chemical with minor concerns about a possible structural alert. The tumor data for all 301 chemicals are re-presented according to these six chemical groupings. The most significant findings to emerge from comparisons among these six groups of chemicals were as follows: (a) Most of the rodent carcinogens, including most of the 2-species and/or multiple site carcinogens, were among the structurally alerting chemicals. (b) Most of the structurally alerting chemicals were mutagenic; 84% of the carcinogens and 66% of the non-carcinogens. 100% of the 33 aromatic amino/nitro-type 2-species carcinogens were mutagenic. Thus, for structurally alerting chemicals, the Salmonella assay showed high sensitivity and low specificity (0.84 and 0.33, respectively). (c) Among the 147 non-alerting chemicals less than 5% were mutagenic, whether they were carcinogens or non-carcinogens (sensitivity 0.04).     

Antimutagenic effects in humans.

The application of antimutagenicity studies to human somatic mutation is discussed, with emphasis on the potential for future studies. Five assay-gene combinations are now available for measuring human somatic mutation in lymphocytes and erythrocytes. Results with these combinations have defined the human background levels, and show clear responses of mutant frequency to a variety of mutagens. The testing of antimutagenic effects on background frequencies is feasible, but has not yet been done. The major uncertainty in such studies is the unknown age of mutant cells in the background, since only the newly forming mutants are potentially susceptible to most antimutagenic treatments. Intervention studies in the face of active mutagenicity and the use of other genotoxicity endpoints, such as chromosome aberrations, micronuclei and DNA adducts, are considered briefly.     

Collaborative study of mutagenicity with Salmonella typhimurium TA102.

Thirty compounds of various chemical classes were investigated for mutagenicity in a collaborative study (3 laboratories) using Salmonella typhimurium TA102. With 5 compounds, namely hydrazine sulfate, phenylhydrazine, hydralazine, glutardialdehyde and glyoxal, mutagenicity was detected by all laboratories. Formaldehyde was assessed as weakly mutagenic in only 1 of 3 laboratories. The remaining 24 agents were uniformly described as non-genotoxic in TA102. In spite of the overall good qualitative agreement in the mutagenicity results between the 3 laboratories some quantitative discrepancies occurred in the dose response of the mutagenic compounds. Varying inter- and intra-laboratory differences in the spontaneous rate of revertants were obtained. The usefulness of the tester strain TA102 in routine mutagenicity testing is discussed.     

Approaches to genetic control for the use of pesticides

Analysis of data available in literature has shown that 65% of 400 pesticides studied for their mutagenicity exert a mutagenic effect on any test-object. The number of revealed mutagens approaches 100% when four or more test-objects are used. Recommendations for quantitative estimation of genetic risk worked out under conditions of model experiments with standard mutagens are not available for pesticides since they are slight mutagens. The necessity for genetic stage-by-stage monitoring of pesticide use is substantiated. This monitoring should be carried out at the stage of experimental studies by means of classifications by the degree of potential mutagenic danger (the method is described) and at the stage of ecological and genetic investigations--by means of the regulation for application with due regard for the summary mutagenic background.     

Classification according to chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella and level of carcinogenicity of a further 42 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the U.S. National Toxicology Program

This paper is an extension and update of an earlier review published in this journal (Ashby and Tennant, 1988). A summary of the rodent carcinogenicity bioassay data on a further 42 chemicals tested by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) is presented. An evaluation of each chemical for structural alerts to DNA-reactivity is also provided, together with a summary of its mutagenicity to Salmonella. The 42 chemicals were numbered and evaluated as an extension of the earlier analysis of 222 NTP chemicals. The activity patterns and conclusions derived from the earlier study remain unchanged for the larger group of 264 chemicals. Based on the extended database of 264 NTP chemicals, the sensitivity of the Salmonella assay for rodent carcinogens is 58% and the specificity for the non-carcinogens is 73%. A total of 32 chemicals were defined as equivocal for carcinogenicity and, of these, 11 (34%) are mutagenic to Salmonella. An evaluation is made of instances where predictions of carcinogenicity, based on structural alerts, disagree with the Salmonella mutagenicity result (12% of the database). The majority of the disagreements are for structural alerts on non-mutagens, and that places these alerts as a sensitive primary screen with a specificity lower than that of the Salmonella assay. That analysis indicates some need for assays complementary to the Salmonella test when screening for potential genotoxic carcinogens. It also reveals that the correlation between structural alerts and mutagenicity to Salmonella is probably greater than 90%. Chemicals predicted to show Michael-type alkylating activity (i.e., CH2 = CHX; where X = an electron-withdrawing group, e.g. acrylamide) have been confirmed as a structural alert, and the halomethanes (624 are possible) have been classified as structurally-alerting. To this end an extended carcinogen-alert model structure is presented. Among the 138 NTP carcinogens now reviewed, 45 (33%) are non-mutagenic to Salmonella and possess a chemical structure that does not alert to DNA-reactivity. These carcinogens therefore either illustrate the need for complementary genetic screening tests to the Salmonella assay, or they represent the group of non-genotoxic carcinogens referred to most specifically by Weisburger and Williams (1981); the latter concept is favoured.     

Strategies and testing methods for identifying mutagenic risks

The evolution of testing strategies and methods for identification of mutagenic agents is discussed, beginning with the concern over potential health and population effects of chemical mutagens in the late 1940s that led to the development of regulatory guidelines for mutagenicity testing in the 1970s and 1980s. Efforts to achieve international harmonization of mutagenicity testing guidelines are summarized, and current issues and needs in the field are discussed, including the need for quantitative methods of mutagenic risk assessment, dose-response thresholds, indirect mechanisms of mutagenicity, and the predictivity of mutagenicity assays for carcinogenicity in vivo. Speculation is offered about the future of mutagenicity testing, including possible near-term changes in standard test batteries and the longer-term roles of expression profiling of damage-response genes, in vivo mutagenicity testing methods, and models that better account for differences in metabolism between humans and laboratory model systems.     

Studies on the mutagenic activity of ascorbic acid in vitro and in vivo

In vitro data are presented to show that ascorbic acid does not have intrinsic mutagenicity towards strain TA100 of S. typhimurium if deionized water is used to prepare the incubation medium. The addition of Cu2+ ions to the bacterial medium that contains ascorbic acid, or the use of tap water and ascorbic acid alone, causes a mutagenic and cytotoxic response that is blocked by EDTA. Additional in vitro data demonstrate that hydrogen peroxide is mutagenic to S. typhimurium strain TA100 and it is suggested that ascorbic acid may be mutagenic and cytotoxic through the generation of hydrogen peroxide. In vivo studies using a sensitive intrahepatic host-mediated mutagenicity assay indicate that ascorbic acid is not genotoxic in guinea pigs even when the dietary intake of vitamin C is above the level required for tissue saturation (5000 mg/kg body weight/day).     

The mutagenic action of nitroimidazoles. IV. A comparison of the mutagenic action of several nitroimidazoles and some imidazoles.

The mutagenic action of 51 imidazoles was investigated. The fluctuation test of Luria and Delbrück was used, with Klebsiella pneumoniae as test organism. 8 compounds, including 5 with a weak mutagenic action in the fluctuation test, were also investigated by the Ames test in which Salmonella typhimurium TA100 was used. Of the 51 imidazoles examined, 33 were nitroimidazoles. 31 of the latter appeared to be mutagenic, whereas out of the 18 other imidazoles without a nitro group only 2 were mutagenic. Several of the substances tested for mutagenicity showed an antimicrobial activity. No direct relationship between antimicrobial action, growth inhibition and mutagenicity was established. With methyl-nitroimidazoles a relationship was found between the chemical structure and mutagenic action. However, when the nitroimidazoles had a more complex chemical structure, a relationship between this structure and mutagenicity could not be established.     

Assessment of the potential germ cell mutagenicity of industrial and plant protection chemicals as part of an integrated study of genotoxicity in vitro and in vivo

An approach is described that enables the germ cell mutagenicity of chemicals to be assessed as part of an integrated assessment of genotoxic potential. It is recommended, first, that the genotoxicity of a chemical be defined by appropriate studies in vitro. This should involve use of the Salmonella mutation assay and an assay for the induction of chromosomal aberrations, but supplementary assays may be indicated in specific instances. If negative results are obtained from these 2 tests there is no need for the conduct of additional tests. Agents considered to be genotoxic in vitro should then be assessed for genotoxicity to rodents. This will usually involve the conduct of a bone marrow cytogenetic assay, and in the case of negative results, a genotoxicity test in an independent tissue. Agents found to be non-genotoxic in vivo are regarded as having no potential for germ cell mutagenicity. Agents found to be genotoxic in vivo may either be assumed to have potential as germ cell mutagens, or their status in this respect may be defined by appropriate germ cell mutagenicity studies. The basis of the approach, which is supported by the available experimental data, is that germ cell mutagens will be evident as somatic cell genotoxins in vivo, and that these will be detected as genotoxins in vitro given appropriate experimentation. The conduct of appropriate and adequate studies is suggested to be of more value than the conduct of a rigid set of prescribed tests.     

Relationships between structure and mutagenic activity of environmental chemicals

This review analyzes relationships between chemical structure and biological activity for several series of compounds. Its focus is on mutagenicity and carcinogenicity and the predictability of these properties on the basis of the chemical structure. Examples are selected from monocyclic aromatic amines, benzidine derivatives, aminoazobenzene derivatives, nitrofurans, aflatoxins, and sterigmatocystins. Results from mutagenicity tests in Salmonella typhimurium are summarized, and their correlation with carciogenicity is discussed. The review is concluded with generalizations on the usefulness of studies on relationships between chemical structure and mutagenic activity.     

Mutagenicity of azo dyes: structure-activity relationships.

Azo dyes are extensively used in textile, printing, leather, paper making, drug and food industries. Following oral exposure, azo dyes are metabolized to aromatic amines by intestinal microflora or liver azoreductases. Aromatic amines are further metabolized to genotoxic compounds by mammalian microsomal enzymes. Many of these aromatic amines are mutagenic in the Ames Salmonella/microsomal assay system. The chemical structure of many mutagenic azo dyes was reviewed, and we found that the biologically active dyes are mainly limited to those compounds containing p-phenylenediamine and benzidine moieties. It was found that for the phenylenediamine moiety, methylation or substitution of a nitro group for an amino group does not decrease mutagenicity. However, sulfonation, carboxylation, deamination, or substitution of an ethyl alcohol or an acetyl group for the hydrogen in the amino groups leads to a decrease in the mutagenic activity. For the benzidine moiety, methylation, methoxylation, halogenation or substitution of an acetyl group for hydrogen in the amino group does not affect mutagenicity, but complexation with copper ions diminishes mutagenicity. The mutagenicity of benzidine or its derivatives is also decreased when in the form of a hydrochloride salt with only one exception. Mutagenicity of azo dyes can, therefore, be predicted by these structure-activity relationships.