Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring

The chaperonin GroEL contains two seven-subunit rings, and allosteric signals between them are required to complete the GroEL reaction cycle. For this reason SR1, a mutant of GroEL that forms only single rings, cannot function as a chaperone. Mutations in SR1 that restore chaperone function weaken its interaction with the cochaperonin GroES. We predicted that GroES mutants with reduced affinity for GroEL would also restore function to SR1. To test this, we mutated residues in GroES in and near its contact site with GroEL. Nearly half of the mutants showed partial function with SR1. Two mutants were confirmed to have reduced affinity for GroEL. Intriguingly, some GroES mutants were able to function with active single ring mutants of GroEL.     

Bacteriophage-encoded cochaperonins can substitute for Escherichia coli's essential GroES protein

The Escherichia coli chaperonin machine is composed of two members, GroEL and GroES. The GroEL chaperonin can bind 10–15% of E. coli’s unfolded proteins in one of its central cavities and help them fold in cooperation with the GroES cochaperonin. Both proteins are absolutely essential for bacterial growth. Several large, lytic bacteriophages, such as T4 and RB49, use the host-encoded GroEL in conjunction with their own bacteriophage-encoded cochaperonin for the correct assembly of their major capsid protein, suggesting a cochaperonin specificity for the in vivo folding of certain substrates. Here, we demonstrate that, when the cochaperonin of either bacteriophage T4 (Gp31) or RB49 (CocO) is expressed in E. coli, the otherwise essential groES gene can be deleted. Thus, it appears that, despite very little sequence identity with groES, the bacteriophage-encoded Gp31 and CocO proteins are capable of replacing GroES in the folding of E. coli’s essential, housekeeping proteins.     

Pseudo-T-even bacteriophage RB49 encodes CocO, a cochaperonin for GroEL, which can substitute for Escherichia coli's GroES and bacteriophage T4's Gp31

Bacteriophage T4-encoded Gp31 is a functional ortholog of the Escherichia coli GroES cochaperonin protein. Both of these proteins form transient, productive complexes with the GroEL chaperonin, required for protein folding and other related functions in the cell. However, Gp31 is specifically required, in conjunction with GroEL, for the correct folding of Gp23, the major capsid protein of T4. To better understand the interaction between GroEL and its cochaperonin cognates, we determined whether the so-called "pseudo-T-even bacteriophages" are dependent on host GroEL function and whether they also encode their own cochaperonin. Here, we report the isolation of an allele-specific mutation of bacteriophage RB49, called epsilon22, which permits growth on the E. coli groEL44 mutant but not on the isogenic wild type host. RB49 epsilon22 was used in marker rescue experiments to identify the corresponding wild type gene, which we have named cocO (cochaperonin cognate). CocO has extremely limited identity to GroES but is 34% identical and 55% similar at the protein sequence level to T4 Gp31, sharing all of the structural features of Gp31 that distinguish it from GroES. CocO can substitute for Gp31 in T4 growth and also suppresses the temperature-sensitive phenotype of the E. coli groES42 mutant. CocO's predicted mobile loop is one residue longer than that of Gp31, with the epsilon22 mutation resulting in a Q36R substitution in this extra residue. Both the CocO wild type and epsilon22 proteins have been purified and shown in vitro to assist GroEL in the refolding of denatured citrate synthase.     

Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL binds nonnative substrate protein in the central cavity of an open ring through exposed hydrophobic residues at the inside aspect of the apical domains and then mediates productive folding upon binding ATP and the cochaperonin GroES. Whether nonnative proteins bind to more than one of the seven apical domains of a GroEL ring is unknown. We have addressed this using rings with various combinations of wild-type and binding-defective mutant apical domains, enabled by their production as single polypeptides. A wild-type extent of binary complex formation with two stringent substrate proteins, malate dehydrogenase or Rubisco, required a minimum of three consecutive binding-proficient apical domains. Rhodanese, a less-stringent substrate, required only two wild-type domains and was insensitive to their arrangement. As a physical correlate, multivalent binding of Rubisco was directly observed in an oxidative cross-linking experiment.     

A Nonconserved Carboxy-Terminal Segment of GroEL Contributes to Reaction Temperature

The role of the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain was analyzed. To understand the molecular basis for the different active temperatures of GroEL from three bacteria, we constructed a series of chimeric GroELs combining the C-terminal segment of the equatorial domain from one species with the remainder of GroEL from another. In each case, the foreign C-terminal segment substantially altered the active temperature range of the chimera. Substitution of L524 of Escherichia coli GroEL with the corresponding residue (isoleucine) from psychrophilic GroEL resulted in a GroE with approximately wild-type activity at 25 °C, but also at 10 °C, a temperature at which wild-type E. coli GroE is inactive. In a detailed look at the temperature dependence of the GroELs, normal E. coli GroEL and the L524I mutant became highly active above 14 °C and 12 °C respectively. Similar temperature dependences were observed in a surface plasmon resonance assay of GroES binding. These results suggested that the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain has an important role in the temperature dependence of GroEL. Moreover, E. coli acquired the ability to grow at low temperature through the introduction of cold-adapted chimeric or L524I mutant groEL genes.     

Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle

GroEL is an Escherichia coli chaperonin that is composed of two heptameric rings stacked back-to-back. GroEL assists protein folding with its cochaperonin GroES in an ATP-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo. However, it is still unclear whether GroES binds to both rings of GroEL simultaneously under physiological conditions. In this study, we monitored the GroEL-GroES interaction in the reaction cycle using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. We found that nearly equivalent amounts of symmetric GroEL-(GroES)(2) (football-shaped) complex and asymmetric GroEL-GroES (bullet-shaped) complex coexist during the functional reaction cycle. We also found that D398A, an ATP hydrolysis defective mutant of GroEL, forms a football-shaped complex with ATP bound to the two rings. Furthermore, we showed that ADP prevents the association of ATP to the trans-ring of GroEL, and as a consequence, the second GroES cannot bind to GroEL. Considering the concentrations of ADP and ATP in E. coli, ADP is expected to have a small effect on the inhibition of GroES binding to the trans-ring of GroEL in vivo. These results suggest that we should reconsider the chaperonin-mediated protein-folding mechanism that involves the football-shaped complex.     

A mutant chaperonin with rearranged inter-ring electrostatic contacts and temperature-sensitive dissociation

The chaperonin GroEL assists protein folding through ATP-dependent, cooperative movements that alternately create folding chambers in its two rings. The substitution E461K at the interface between these two rings causes temperature-sensitive, defective protein folding in Escherichia coli. To understand the molecular defect, we have examined the mutant chaperonin by cryo-EM. The normal out-of-register alignment of contacts between subunits of opposing wild-type rings is changed in E461K to an in-register one. This is associated with loss of cooperativity in ATP binding and hydrolysis. Consistent with the loss of negative cooperativity between rings, the cochaperonin GroES binds simultaneously to both E461K rings. These GroES-bound structures were unstable at higher temperature, dissociating into complexes of single E461K rings associated with GroES. Lacking the allosteric signal from the opposite ring, these complexes cannot release their GroES and become trapped, dead-end states.     

Stimulating the substrate folding activity of a single ring GroEL variant by modulating the cochaperonin GroES

In mediating protein folding, chaperonin GroEL and cochaperonin GroES form an enclosed chamber for substrate proteins in an ATP-dependent manner. The essential role of the double ring assembly of GroEL is demonstrated by the functional deficiency of the single ring GroEL(SR). The GroEL(SR)-GroES is highly stable with minimal ATPase activity. To restore the ATP cycle and the turnover of the folding chamber, we sought to weaken the GroEL(SR)-GroES interaction systematically by concatenating seven copies of groES to generate groES(7). GroES Ile-25, Val-26, and Leu-27, residues on the GroEL-GroES interface, were substituted with Asp on different groES modules of groES(7). GroES(7) variants activate ATP activity of GroEL(SR), but only some restore the substrate folding function of GroEL(SR), indicating a direct role of GroES in facilitating substrate folding through its dynamics with GroEL. Active GroEL(SR)-GroES(7) systems may resemble mammalian mitochondrial chaperonin systems.     

Asp-52 in Combination with Asp-398 Plays a Critical Role in ATP Hydrolysis of Chaperonin GroEL

The Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL is a double-ring chaperone that assists protein folding with the aid of GroES and ATP. Asp-398 in GroEL is known as one of the critical residues on ATP hydrolysis because GroEL(D398A) mutant is deficient in ATP hydrolysis (<2% of the wild type) but not in ATP binding. In the archaeal Group II chaperonin, another aspartate residue, Asp-52 in the corresponding E. coli GroEL, in addition to Asp-398 is also important for ATP hydrolysis. We investigated the role of Asp-52 in GroEL and found that ATPase activity of GroEL(D52A) and GroEL(D52A/D398A) mutants was ∼20% and <0.01% of wild-type GroEL, respectively, indicating that Asp-52 in E. coli GroEL is also involved in the ATP hydrolysis. GroEL(D52A/D398A) formed a symmetric football-shaped GroEL-GroES complex in the presence of ATP, again confirming the importance of the symmetric complex during the GroEL ATPase cycle. Notably, the symmetric complex of GroEL(D52A/D398A) was extremely stable, with a half-time of ∼150 h (∼6 days), providing a good model to characterize the football-shaped complex.     

Evolution of Escherichia coli for Growth at High Temperatures

Evolution depends on the acquisition of genomic mutations that increase cellular fitness. Here, we evolved Escherichia coli MG1655 cells to grow at extreme temperatures. We obtained a maximum growth temperature of 48.5 °C, which was not increased further upon continuous cultivation at this temperature for >600 generations. Despite a permanently induced heat shock response in thermoresistant cells, only exquisitely high GroEL/GroES levels are essential for growth at 48.5 °C. They depend on the presence of lysyl-tRNA-synthetase, LysU, because deletion of lysU rendered thermoresistant cells thermosensitive. Our data suggest that GroEL/GroES are especially required for the folding of mutated proteins generated during evolution. GroEL/GroES therefore appear as mediators of evolution of extremely heat-resistant E. coli cells.     

GroEL assisted folding of large polypeptide substrates in Escherichia coli: Present scenario and assignments for the future

Escherichia coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES are indispensable for survival and growth of the cell since they provide essential assistance to the folding of many newly translated proteins in the cell. Recent studies indicate that a substantial portion of the proteins involved in the host pathways are completely dependent on GroEL–GroES for their folding and hence providing some explanation for why GroEL is essential for cell growth. Many proteins either small-single domain or large multidomains require assistance from GroEL–ES during their lifetime. Proteins of size up to 70 kDa can fold via the cis mechanism during GroEL–ES assisted pathway, but other proteins (>70 kDa) that cannot be pushed inside the cavity of GroEL–ATP complex upon binding of GroES fold by an evolved mechanism called trans. In recent years, much work has been done on revealing facts about the cis mechanism involving the GroEL assisted folding of small proteins whereas the trans mechanism with larger polypeptide substrates still remains under cover. In order to disentangle the role of chaperonin GroEL–GroES in the folding of large E. coli proteins, this review discusses a number of issues like the range of large polypeptide substrates acted on by GroEL. Do all these substrates need the complete chaperonin system along with ATP for their folding? Does GroEL act as foldase or holdase during the process? We conclude with a discussion of the various queries that need to be resolved in the future for an extensive understanding of the mechanism of GroEL mediated folding of large substrate proteins in E. coli cytosol.     

Probing the functional mechanism of Escherichia coli GroEL using circular permutation

Background

The Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL subunit consists of three domains linked via two hinge regions, and each domain is responsible for a specific role in the functional mechanism. Here, we have used circular permutation to study the structural and functional characteristics of the GroEL subunit.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Three soluble, partially active mutants with polypeptide ends relocated into various positions of the apical domain of GroEL were isolated and studied. The basic functional hallmarks of GroEL (ATPase and chaperoning activities) were retained in all three mutants. Certain functional characteristics, such as basal ATPase activity and ATPase inhibition by the cochaperonin GroES, differed in the mutants while at the same time, the ability to facilitate the refolding of rhodanese was roughly equal. Stopped-flow fluorescence experiments using a fluorescent variant of the circularly permuted GroEL CP376 revealed that a specific kinetic transition that reflects movements of the apical domain was missing in this mutant. This mutant also displayed several characteristics that suggested that the apical domains were behaving in an uncoordinated fashion.

Conclusions/Significance

The loss of apical domain coordination and a concomitant decrease in functional ability highlights the importance of certain conformational signals that are relayed through domain interlinks in GroEL. We propose that circular permutation is a very versatile tool to probe chaperonin structure and function.     

The roles of different regions of the CycH protein in<Emphasis Type="Italic"> c</Emphasis>-type cytochrome biogenesis in<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Sinorhizobium meliloti</Emphasis>

Cytochrome c heme lyases encoded by the Sinorhizobium meliloti cycHJKL operon are responsible for generating the covalent bond between the heme prosthetic group and apocytochromes c. The CycH protein with its presumably membrane-associated N-terminal and periplasmic C-terminal parts is thought to be responsible for binding apocytochrome and presenting it to the heme ligation machinery. We propose that these two modules of CycH play roles in different functions of the protein. The N-terminal 96 amino acids represent an active subdomain of the protein, which is able to complement the protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) accumulation phenotype of the cycH mutant strain AT342, suggesting that it is involved in the final steps of heme C biosynthesis. Furthermore, three tetratricopeptide (TPR) domains have been identified in the C-terminal periplasmic region of the CycH protein. TPR domains are known to mediate protein-protein interactions. Each of these CycH domains is absolutely required for protein function, since plasmid constructs carrying cycH genes with in-frame TPR deletions were not able to complement cycH mutants for their nitrate reductase (Rnr^–) and nitrogen-fixing (Fix^–) phenotypes. We also found that the 309-amino acid N-terminal portion of the CycH, which includes all the TPR domains, is able to mediate the assembly of the c-type cytochromes required for the Rnr⁺ phenotype. In contrast, only the full-length protein confers the ability to fix nitrogen.Communicated by A. Kondorosi     

A nonconserved carboxy-terminal segment of GroEL contributes to reaction temperature

The role of the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain was analyzed. To understand the molecular basis for the different active temperatures of GroEL from three bacteria, we constructed a series of chimeric GroELs combining the C-terminal segment of the equatorial domain from one species with the remainder of GroEL from another. In each case, the foreign C-terminal segment substantially altered the active temperature range of the chimera. Substitution of L524 of Escherichia coli GroEL with the corresponding residue (isoleucine) from psychrophilic GroEL resulted in a GroE with approximately wild-type activity at 25 degrees C, but also at 10 degrees C, a temperature at which wild-type E. coli GroE is inactive. In a detailed look at the temperature dependence of the GroELs, normal E. coli GroEL and the L524I mutant became highly active above 14 degrees C and 12 degrees C respectively. Similar temperature dependences were observed in a surface plasmon resonance assay of GroES binding. These results suggested that the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain has an important role in the temperature dependence of GroEL. Moreover, E. coli acquired the ability to grow at low temperature through the introduction of cold-adapted chimeric or L524I mutant groEL genes.     

Genetic analysis of the bacteriophage T4-encoded cochaperonin Gp31.

Previous genetic and biochemical analyses have established that the bacteriophage T4-encoded Gp31 is a cochaperonin that interacts with Escherichia coli's GroEL to ensure the timely and accurate folding of Gp23, the bacteriophage-encoded major capsid protein. The heptameric Gp31 cochaperonin, like the E. coli GroES cochaperonin, interacts with GroEL primarily through its unstructured mobile loop segment. Upon binding to GroEL, the mobile loop adopts a structured, beta-hairpin turn. In this article, we present extensive genetic data that strongly substantiate and extend these biochemical studies. These studies begin with the isolation of mutations in gene 31 based on the ability to plaque on groEL44 mutant bacteria, whose mutant product interacts weakly with Gp31. Our genetic system is unique because it also allows for the direct selection of revertants of such gene 31 mutations, based on their ability to plaque on groEL515 mutant bacteria. Interestingly, all of these revertants are pseudorevertants because the original 31 mutation is maintained. In addition, we show that the classical tsA70 mutation in gene 31 changes a conserved hydrophobic residue in the mobile loop to a hydrophilic one. Pseudorevertants of tsA70, which enable growth at the restrictive temperatures, acquire the same mutation previously shown to allow plaque formation on groEL44 mutant bacteria. Our genetic analyses highlight the crucial importance of all three highly conserved hydrophobic residues of the mobile loop of Gp31 in the productive interaction with GroEL.     

Electron Microscopy of Bacillus subtilis GroESL Chaperonin and Interaction with the Bacteriophage φ29 Head-Tail Connector

The Bacillus subtilis GroESL chaperonin was isolated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation and the constituent GroES and GroEL moieties were purified by electrophoresis in agarose. Electron microscopic images of negatively stained GroEL and GroES oligomers and GroESL complexes were averaged using a reference-free alignment method. The GroEL and GroES particles had the sevenfold symmetry characteristic of their Escherichia coli counterparts. GroESL complexes, reconstituted efficiently in vitro from GroEL and GroES in the absence of added ADP or ATP, had the characteristic bullet- and football-like shapes in side view. Purified bacteriophage φ29 head-tail connectors having a mass in excess of 0.4 MDa were shown to bind to GroESL at the end opposite to the GroES. The same GroESL-connector complexes were isolated from phage-infected cells in which capsid assembly was blocked, and thus the complex may have functional significance in φ29 morphogenesis.     

Allostery Wiring Diagrams in the Transitions that Drive the GroEL Reaction Cycle

Determining the network of residues that transmit allosteric signals is crucial to understanding the function of biological nanomachines. During the course of a reaction cycle, biological machines in general, and Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL in particular, undergo large-scale conformational changes in response to ligand binding. Normal mode analyses, based on structure-based coarse-grained models where each residue is represented by an α carbon atom, have been widely used to describe the motions encoded in the structures of proteins. Here, we propose a new C^α-side chain elastic network model of proteins that includes information about the physical identity of each residue and accurately accounts for the side-chain topology and packing within the structure. Using the C^α-side chain elastic network model and the structural perturbation method, which probes the response of a local perturbation at a given site at all other sites in the structure, we determine the network of key residues (allostery wiring diagram) responsible for the T → R and R″ → T transitions in GroEL. A number of residues, both within a subunit and at the interface of two adjacent subunits, are found to be at the origin of the positive cooperativity in the ATP-driven T → R transition. Of particular note are residues G244, R58, D83, E209, and K327. Of these, R38, D83, and K327 are highly conserved. G244 is located in the apical domain at the interface between two subunits; E209 and K327 are located in the apical domain, toward the center of a subunit; R58 and D83 are equatorial domain residues. The allostery wiring diagram shows that the network of residues are interspersed throughout the structure. Residues D83, V174, E191, and D359 play a critical role in the R″ → T transition, which implies that mutations of these residues would compromise the ATPase activity. D83 and E191 are also highly conserved; D359 is moderately conserved. The negative cooperativity between the rings in the R″ → T transition is orchestrated through several interface residues within a single ring, including N10, E434, D435, and E451. Signal from the trans ring that is transmitted across the interface between the equatorial domains is responsible for the R″ → T transition. The cochaperonin GroES plays a passive role in the R″ → T transition. Remarkably, the binding affinity of GroES for GroEL is allosterically linked to GroEL residues 350-365 that span helices K and L. The movements of helices K and L alter the polarity of the cavity throughout the GroEL functional cycle and undergo large-scale motions that are anticorrelated with the other apical domain residues. The allostery wiring diagrams for the T → R and R″ → T transitions of GroEL provide a microscopic foundation for the cooperativity (anticooperativity) within (between) the ring (rings). Using statistical coupling analysis, we extract evolutionarily linked clusters of residues in GroEL and GroES. We find that several substrate protein binding residues as well as sites related to ATPase activity belong to a single functional network in GroEL. For GroES, the mobile loop residues and GroES/GroES interface residues are linked.     

Crystal Structure of a Symmetric Football-Shaped GroEL:GroES2-ATP14 Complex Determined at 3.8 Å Reveals Rearrangement between Two GroEL Rings

The chaperonin GroEL is an essential chaperone that assists in protein folding with the aid of GroES and ATP. GroEL forms a double-ring structure, and both rings can bind GroES in the presence of ATP. Recent progress on the GroEL mechanism has revealed the importance of a symmetric 1:2 GroEL:GroES₂ complex (the “football”-shaped complex) as a critical intermediate during the functional GroEL cycle. We determined the crystal structure of the football GroEL:GroES₂-ATP₁₄ complex from Escherichia coli at 3.8 Å, using a GroEL mutant that is extremely defective in ATP hydrolysis. The overall structure of the football complex resembled the GroES-bound GroEL ring of the asymmetric 1:1 GroEL:GroES complex (the “bullet” complex). However, the two GroES-bound GroEL rings form a modified interface by an ~ 7° rotation about the 7-fold axis. As a result, the inter-ring contacts between the two GroEL rings in the football complex differed from those in the bullet complex. The differences provide a structural basis for the apparently impaired inter-ring negative cooperativity observed in several biochemical analyses.     

Hydrophilic residues at the apical domain of GroEL contribute to GroES binding but attenuate polypeptide binding

The GroES binding site at the apical domain of GroEL, mostly consisting of hydrophobic residues, overlaps largely with the substrate polypeptide binding site. Essential contribution of hydrophobic interaction to the binding of both GroES and polypeptide was exemplified by the mutant GroEL(L237Q) which lost the ability to bind either of them. The binding site, however, contains three hydrophilic residues, E238, T261, and N265. For GroES binding, N265 is essential since GroEL(N265A) is unable to bind GroES. E238 contributes to rapid GroES binding to GroEL because GroEL(E238A) is extremely sluggish in GroES binding. Polypeptide binding was not impaired by any mutations of E238A, T261A, and N265A. Rather, these mutants, especially GroEL(N265A), showed stronger polypeptide binding affinity than wild-type GroEL. Thus, these hydrophilic residues have a dual role; they help GroES binding on one hand but attenuate polypeptide binding on the other hand.     

The C-Terminal Random Coil Region Tunes the Ca2+-Binding Affinity of S100A4 through Conformational Activation

S100A4 interacts with many binding partners upon Ca²⁺ activation and is strongly associated with increased metastasis formation. In order to understand the role of the C-terminal random coil for the protein function we examined how small angle X-ray scattering of the wild-type S100A4 and its C-terminal deletion mutant (residues 1–88, Δ13) changes upon Ca²⁺ binding. We found that the scattering intensity of wild-type S100A4 changes substantially in the 0.15–0.25 Å⁻¹ q-range whereas a similar change is not visible in the C-terminus deleted mutant. Ensemble optimization SAXS modeling indicates that the entire C-terminus is extended when Ca²⁺ is bound. Pulsed field gradient NMR measurements provide further support as the hydrodynamic radius in the wild-type protein increases upon Ca²⁺ binding while the radius of Δ13 mutant does not change. Molecular dynamics simulations provide a rational explanation of the structural transition: the positively charged C-terminal residues associate with the negatively charged residues of the Ca²⁺-free EF-hands and these interactions loosen up considerably upon Ca²⁺-binding. As a consequence the Δ13 mutant has increased Ca²⁺ affinity and is constantly loaded at Ca²⁺ concentration ranges typically present in cells. The activation of the entire C-terminal random coil may play a role in mediating interaction with selected partner proteins of S100A4.