Dual recognition of the bacterial chemoreceptor by chemotaxis-specific domains of the CheR methyltransferase

Adaptation to persisting stimulation is required for highly sensitive detection of temporal changes of stimuli, and often involves covalent modification of receptors. Therefore, it is of vital importance to understand how a receptor and its cognate modifying enzyme(s) modulate each other through specific protein-protein interactions. In the chemotaxis of Escherichia coli, adaptation requires methylation of chemoreceptors (e.g. Tar) catalyzed by the CheR methyltransferase. CheR binds to the C-terminal NWETF sequence of a chemoreceptor that is distinct from the methylation sites. However, little is known about how CheR recognizes its methylation sites or how it is distributed in a cell. In this study, we used comparative genomics to demonstrate that the CheR chemotaxis methyltransferase contains three structurally and functionally distinct modules: (i) the catalytic domain common to a methyltransferase superfamily; (ii) the N-terminal domain; and (iii) the beta-subdomain of the catalytic domain, both of which are found exclusively in chemotaxis methyltransferases. The only evolutionary conserved motif specific to CheR is the positively charged face of helix alpha2 in the N-terminal domain. The disulfide cross-linking analysis suggested that this face interacts with the methylation helix of Tar. We also demonstrated that CheR localizes to receptor clusters at cell poles via interaction of the beta-subdomain with the NWETF sequence. Thus, the two chemotaxis-specific modules of CheR interact with distinct regions of the chemoreceptor for targeting to the receptor cluster and for recognition of the substrate sites, respectively.     

The carboxyl-terminal linker is important for chemoreceptor function

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by chemoreceptor methylation and demethylation. In Escherichia coli, methyltransferase CheR and methylesterase CheB bind both substrate sites and a carboxyl-terminal pentapeptide sequence carried by certain receptors. Pentapeptide binding enhances enzyme action, an enhancement required for effective adaptation and chemotaxis. Pentapeptides are linked to the conserved body of chemoreceptors through a notably variable sequence of 30-35 residues. We created nested deletions from the distal end of this linker in chemoreceptor Tar. Chemotaxis was eliminated by deletion of 20-40 residues and reduced by shorter deletions. This did not reflect generalized disruption, because all but the most extremely truncated receptors activated kinase, were substrates for adaptational modification and performed transmembrane signalling. In contrast, linker truncations reduced rates of adaptational modification in parallel with chemotaxis. We concluded the linker is important for chemotaxis because of its role in adaptational modification. Effects of linker truncations on CheR binding to receptor-borne pentapeptide implied linker (i) makes pentapeptide available to modification enzymes by separation from the helical receptor body, and (ii) is a flexible arm allowing dual binding of enzyme to pentapeptide and modification site. The data suggest linker and the helix from which it emerges are structurally dynamic.     

The aspartate chemoreceptor Tar is effectively methylated by binding to the methyltransferase mainly through hydrophobic interaction

In the chemotaxis of Escherichia coli, adaptation requires the methylation and demethylation of transmembrane receptors, which are catalysed by the methyltransferase CheR and the methylesterase CheB respectively. CheR binds to major chemoreceptors through their C-terminal motif NWETF, which is distinct from the methylation sites. In this study, we carried out a systematic mutagenesis of the pentapeptide sequence of Tar. Receptor methylation and adaptation were severely impaired by the alanine substitution of residue W550 and, to a lesser extent, by that of F553. Substitution of residues N549, E551 and T552 had only a slight or little effect. The defects of the W550A and F553A mutations were suppressed by high- and low-level overproduction of CheR respectively. Expression of a fusion protein containing the NWETF sequence, but not its W550A and F553A versions, inhibited chemotaxis of the Che+ strain. In an in vitro assay, CheR bound to the wild-type version but not to the mutant versions. These results and further mutagenesis suggest that the hydrophobicity and the size of residues W550 and F553 are critical in the interaction with CheR, a conclusion that is consistent with the crystal structure of a CheR-NWETF complex. On the other hand, the negatively charged side chain of E551 and the polar side chains of N549 and T552 may not be strictly required, although the presence of a salt bridge and hydrogen bonds between these residues and residues from CheR has been noted in the co-crystal.     

Characterization of the Thermotoga maritima chemotaxis methylation system that lacks pentapeptide-dependent methyltransferase CheR:MCP tethering

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by covalent modifications of specific glutamate and glutamine residues within the cytoplasmic domains of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). In Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica, efficient methylation of MCPs depends on the localization of methyltransferase CheR to MCP clusters through an interaction between the CheR beta-subdomain and a pentapeptide sequence (NWETF or NWESF) at the C-terminus of the MCP. In vitro methylation analyses utilizing S. enterica and Thermotoga maritima CheR proteins and MCPs indicate that MCP methylation in T. maritima occurs independently of a pentapeptide-binding motif. Kinetic and binding measurements demonstrate that despite efficient methylation, the interaction between T. maritima CheR and T. maritima MCPs is of relatively low affinity. Comparative protein sequence analyses of CheR beta-subdomains from organisms having MCPs that contain and/or lack pentapeptide-binding motifs identified key similarities and differences in residue conservation, suggesting the existence of two distinct classes of CheR proteins: pentapeptide-dependent and pentapeptide-independent methyltransferases. Analysis of MCP C-terminal ends showed that only approximately 10% of MCPs contain a putative C-terminal binding motif, the majority of which are restricted to the different proteobacteria classes (alpha, beta, gamma, delta). These findings suggest that tethering of CheR to MCPs is a relatively recent event in evolution and that the pentapeptide-independent methylation system is more common than the well-characterized pentapeptide-dependent methylation system.     

Ligand-specific activation of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor transmethylation

Adaptation in the chemosensory pathways of bacteria like Escherichia coli is mediated by the enzyme-catalyzed methylation (and demethylation) of glutamate residues in the signaling domains of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). MCPs can be methylated in trans, where the methyltransferase (CheR) molecule catalyzing methyl group transfer is tethered to the C terminus of a neighboring receptor. Here, it was shown that E. coli cells exhibited adaptation to attractant stimuli mediated through either engineered or naturally occurring MCPs that were unable to tether CheR as long as another MCP capable of tethering CheR was also present, e.g., either the full-length aspartate or serine receptor (Tar or Tsr). Methylation of isolated membrane samples in which engineered tethering and substrate receptors were coexpressed demonstrated that the truncated substrate receptors (trTsr) were efficiently methylated in the presence of tethering receptors (Tar with methylation sites blocked) relative to samples in which none of the MCPs had tethering sites. The effects of ligand binding on methylation were investigated, and an increase in rate was produced only with serine (the ligand specific for the substrate receptor trTsr); no significant change in rate was produced by aspartate (the ligand specific for the tethering receptor Tar). Although the overall efficiency of methylation was lower, receptor-specific effects were also observed in trTar- and trTsr-containing samples, where neither Tar nor Tsr possessed the CheR binding site at the C terminus. Altogether, the results are consistent with a ligand-induced conformational change that is limited to the methylated receptor dimer and does not spread to adjacent receptor dimers.     

Methylation-independent aerotaxis mediated by the Escherichia coli Aer protein

Aer is a membrane-associated protein that mediates aerotactic responses in Escherichia coli. Its C-terminal half closely resembles the signaling domains of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), which undergo reversible methylation at specific glutamic acid residues to adapt their signaling outputs to homogeneous chemical environments. MCP-mediated behaviors are dependent on two specific enzymes, CheR (methyltransferase) and CheB (methylesterase). The Aer signaling domain contains unorthodox methylation sites that do not conform to the consensus motif for CheR or CheB substrates, suggesting that Aer, unlike conventional MCPs, might be a methylation-independent transducer. Several lines of evidence supported this possibility. (i) The Aer protein was not detectably modified by either CheR or CheB. (ii) Amino acid replacements at the putative Aer methylation sites generally had no deleterious effect on Aer function. (iii) Aer promoted aerotactic migrations on semisolid media in strains that lacked all four of the E. coli MCPs. CheR and CheB function had no influence on the rate of aerotactic movements in those strains. Thus, Aer senses and signals efficiently in the absence of deamidation or methylation, methylation changes, methylation enzymes, and methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. We also found that chimeric transducers containing the PAS-HAMP sensing domain of Aer joined to the signaling domain and methylation sites of Tar, an orthodox MCP, exhibited both methylation-dependent and methylation-independent aerotactic behavior. The hybrid Aear transducers demonstrate that methylation independence does not emanate from the Aer signaling domain but rather may be due to transience of the cellular redox changes that are thought to trigger Aer-mediated behavioral responses.     

Template-directed assembly of receptor signaling complexes

Transmembrane receptors in the signaling pathways of bacterial chemotaxis systems influence cell motility by forming noncovalent complexes with the cytoplasmic signaling proteins to regulate their activity. The requirements for receptor-mediated activation of CheA, the principal kinase of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis signaling pathway, were investigated using self-assembled clusters of a receptor fragment (CF) derived from the cytoplasmic domain of the aspartate receptor, Tar. Histidine-tagged Tar CF was assembled on the surface of sonicated unilamellar vesicles via a lipid containing the nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid moiety as a headgroup. In the presence of the adaptor protein CheW, CheA bound to and was activated approximately 180-fold by vesicle-bound CF. The extent of CheA activation was found to be independent of the level of covalent modification on the CF. Instead, the stability of the complex increased significantly as the level of covalent modification increased. Surface-assembled CF was also found to serve as a substrate for receptor methylation in a reaction catalyzed by the receptor methyltransferase, CheR. Since neither CheA activation nor CF methylation was observed in comparable samples in the absence of vesicles, it is concluded that surface templating generates the organization among CF subunits required for biochemical activity.     

Location of the receptor-interaction site on CheB, the methylesterase response regulator of bacterial chemotaxis.

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by covalent modification of chemoreceptors, specifically methylation and demethylation of glutamates catalyzed by methyltransferase CheR and methylesterase CheB. The methylesterase is a two-domain response regulator in which phosphorylation of the regulatory domain enhances activity of the catalytic domain. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, a crucial determinant of efficient methylation and demethylation is a specific pentapeptide sequence at the chemoreceptor carboxyl terminus, a position distant from sites of enzymatic action. Each enzyme binds pentapeptide, but the site of binding has been located only for CheR. Here we locate the pentapeptide-binding site on CheB by assessing catalytic activity and pentapeptide binding of CheB fragments, protection of CheB from proteolysis by pentapeptide, and interference with pentapeptide-CheB interaction by a CheB segment. The results place the binding site near the hinge between regulatory and catalytic domains, in a segment spanning the carboxyl-terminal end of the regulatory domain and the beginning of the linker that stretches to the catalytic domain. This location is quite different from the catalytic domain location of the pentapeptide-binding site on CheR and is likely to reflect the rather different ways in which pentapeptide binding enhances enzymatic action for the methyltransferase and the methylesterase.     

Identification of methylation sites in Thermotoga maritima chemotaxis receptors

Adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis involves reversible methylation of specific glutamate residues within the cytoplasmic domains of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. The specific sites of methylation in Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli chemoreceptors, identified 2 decades ago, established a consensus sequence for methylation by methyltransferase CheR. Here we report the in vitro methylation of chemoreceptors from Thermotoga maritima, a hyperthermophile that has served as a useful source of chemotaxis proteins for structural analysis. Sites of methylation have been identified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Fifteen sites of methylation were identified within the cytoplasmic domains of four different T. maritima chemoreceptors. The results establish a consensus sequence for chemoreceptor methylation sites in T. maritima that is distinct from the previously identified consensus sequence for E. coli and S. enterica. These findings suggest that consensus sequences for posttranslational modifications in one organism may not be directly extrapolated to analogous modifications in other bacteria.     

Molecular modeling of flexible arm‐mediated interactions between bacterial chemoreceptors and their modification enzyme

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by methylation and demethylation of specific glutamyl residues in the cytoplasmic domain of chemoreceptors. Methylation is catalyzed by methyltransferase CheR. In E. coli and related organisms, methylation sufficiently rapid to be physiologically effective requires a carboxyl terminal pentapeptide sequence on the receptor being modified or, via adaptational assistance, on a neighboring homodimer in a receptor cluster. Pentapeptide‐enhanced methylation is thought to be mediated by a ～30 residue, potentially disordered sequence that serves as a flexible arm connecting the receptor body and pentapeptide‐bound methyltransferase, thus allowing diffusionally restricted enzyme to reach methyl‐accepting sites. However, it was not known how many or which sites on the same or neighboring receptors were accessible to the tethered enzyme. We investigated using molecular modeling and found that, in a hexagonal array of trimers of receptor dimers, CheR tethered to a dimer of chemoreceptor Tar by its native 30‐residue flexible‐arm sequence could reach all methyl‐accepting sites on the dimer to which it was tethered plus 48 methyl‐accepting sites distributed among nine neighboring dimers, equivalent to the total sites carried by six receptors. This modeling‐determined methylation neighborhood of one enzyme‐binding dimer and six neighbors corresponds precisely with the experimentally identified neighborhood of seven. Thus, the experimentally observed adaptational assistance can occur by docking of pentapeptide‐bound, diffusionally restricted enzyme to methyl‐accepting sites on neighboring receptors. Our analysis introduces the notion that physiologically relevant adaptational assistance could occur even if only a subset of sites on a particular receptor are within reach.     

The specificity of carboxypeptidase Y may be altered by changing the hydrophobicity of the S'1 binding pocket.

The S'1 binding pocket of carboxypeptidase Y is hydrophobic, spacious, and open to solvent, and the enzyme exhibits a preference for hydrophobic P'1 amino acid residues. Leu272 and Ser297, situated at the rim of the pocket, and Leu267, slightly further away, have been substituted by site-directed mutagenesis. The mutant enzymes have been characterized kinetically with respect to their P'1 substrate preferences using the substrate series FA-Ala-Xaa-OH (Xaa = Leu, Glu, Lys, or Arg) and FA-Phe-Xaa-OH (Xaa = Ala, Val, or Leu). The results reveal that hydrophobic P'1 residues bind in the vicinity of residue 272 while positively charged P'1 residues interact with Ser297. Introduction of Asp or Glu at position 267 greatly reduced the activity toward hydrophobic P'1 residues (Leu) and increased the activity two- to three-fold for the hydrolysis of substrates with Lys or Arg in P'1. Negatively charged substituents at position 272 reduced the activity toward hydrophobic P'1 residues even more, but without increasing the activity toward positively charged P'1 residues. The mutant enzyme L267D + L272D was found to have a preference for substrates with C-terminal basic amino acid residues. The opposite situation, where the positively charged Lys or Arg were introduced at one of the positions 267, 272, or 297, did not increase the rather low activity toward substrates with Glu in the P'1 position but greatly reduced the activity toward substrates with C-terminal Lys or Arg due to electrostatic repulsion. The characterized mutant enzymes exhibit various specificities, which may be useful in C-terminal amino acid sequence determinations.     

Identification of ligand effector binding sites in transmembrane regions of the human G protein-coupled C3a receptor

The human C3a anaphylatoxin receptor (C3aR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) composed of seven transmembrane alpha-helices connected by hydrophilic loops. Previous studies of chimeric C3aR/C5aR and loop deletions in C3aR demonstrated that the large extracellular loop2 plays an important role in noneffector ligand binding; however, the effector binding site for C3a has not been identified. In this study, selected charged residues in the transmembrane regions of C3aR were replaced by Ala using site-directed mutagenesis, and mutant receptors were stably expressed in the RBL-2H3 cell line. Ligand binding studies demonstrated that R161A (helix IV), R340A (helix V), and D417A (helix VII) showed no binding activity, although full expression of these receptors was established by flow cytometric analysis. C3a induced very weak intracellular calcium flux in cells expressing these three mutant receptors. H81A (helix II) and K96A (helix III) showed decreased ligand binding activity. The calcium flux induced by C3a in H81A and K96A cells was also consistently reduced. These findings suggest that the charged transmembrane residues Arg161, Arg340, and Asp417 in C3aR are essential for ligand effector binding and/or signal coupling, and that residues His81 and Lys96 may contribute less directly to the overall free energy of ligand binding. These transmembrane residues in C3aR identify specific molecular contacts for ligand interactions that account for C3a-induced receptor activation.     

Solvent-dependent precipitation of prion protein

To mediate adaptation to stimuli, the methyltransferase (CheR) catalyzes methyl group transfer from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) to glutamyl residues in the transmembrane receptors of the bacterial chemosensory signaling pathway. The interaction between receptors and CheR occurs at two sites: a methylation site-active site interaction, and a 'docking' site interaction that is separated both from the methylation sites and the CheR active site. It is not certain if the docking site interaction functions merely to localize the transferase in close proximity to the methylation sites, or if it also increases CheR catalytic activity. Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments are conducted to test for allosteric interactions between the docking and active sites on CheR, which are expected to be present if docking activates CheR. The binding parameters (DeltaG, DeltaH, DeltaS) of a substrate analog of SAM, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH), are measured both in the absence and presence of saturating concentrations of a pentapeptide (NWETF) that defines the docking receptor docking segment. SAH binding is unaffected by the presence of saturating NWETF, providing evidence that an allosteric activation of CheR does not take place upon docking, and thus supports the idea that the CheR-NWETF interaction merely functions to localize CheR near the sites of methylation.     

Conversion of a bacterial warm sensor to a cold sensor by methylation of a single residue in the presence of an attractant

The aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) of Escherichia coli also serves as a thermosensor, and it is very amenable to genetic and biochemical analysis of the thermosensing mechanism. Its thermosensing properties are controlled by reversible methylation of the cytoplasmic signalling/adaptation domain of the protein. The unmethylated and the fully methylated (aspartate-bound) receptors sense, as attractant stimuli, increases (warm sensor) and decreases (cold sensor) in temperature respectively. To learn more about the mechanism of thermosensing, we replaced the four methyl-accepting glutamyl residues with non-methylatable aspartyl residues in all possible combinations. In a strain defective in both methyltransferase (CheR) and methylesterase (CheB) activities, all of the mutant Tar proteins functioned as warm sensors. To create a situation in which all of the remaining glutamyl residues were methylated, we expressed the mutant proteins in a CheB-defective, CheR-overproducing strain. The fully glutamyl-methylated proteins were designed to mimic the full range of methylation states possible for wild-type Tar. Almost all of the methylated mutant receptors, including those with single glutamyl residues, were cold sensors in the presence of aspartate. Thus, binding of aspartate to Tar and methylation of its single glutamyl residue can invert its temperature-dependent signalling properties.     

Suppression of receptor interacting protein 140 repressive activity by protein arginine methylation

Receptor interacting protein 140 (RIP140), a ligand-dependent corepressor for nuclear receptors, can be modified by arginine methylation. Three methylated arginine residues, at Arg-240, Arg-650, and Arg-948, were identified by mass spectrometric analysis. Site-directed mutagenesis studies demonstrated the functionality of these arginine residues. The biological activity of RIP140 was suppressed by protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) due to RIP140 methylation, which reduced the recruitment of histone deacetylases to RIP140 and facilitated its nuclear export by enhancing interaction with exportin 1. A constitutive negative (Arg/Ala) mutant of RIP140 was resistant to the effect of PRMT1, and a constitutive positive (Arg/Phe) mutation mimicked the effect of arginine methylation. The biological activities of the wild type and the mutant proteins were examined in RIP140-null MEF cells. This study uncovered a novel means to inactivate, or suppress, RIP140, and demonstrated protein arginine methylation as a critical type of modification for corepressor.     

Ligand-induced functions of the epidermal growth factor receptor require the positively charged region asymmetrically distributed across plasma membrane.

Many plasma membrane proteins, including the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, possess basic regions on the cytoplasmic surface of the membrane. To examine the function of these positively charged regions, we constructed mutated EGF receptor genes lacking this region by substitution of the basic amino acid residues with 3 approximately 8 neutral Asn residues, or by their complete deletion. There was no significant difference in the affinities for EGF of the wild-type and mutant receptors which are produced in rodent fibroblasts through transfection. However, EGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the receptor was strongly inhibited by removal of the 3 approximately 8 positively charged residues. On addition of EGF, cells expressing the mutant EGF receptors did not show morphological changes, whereas cells expressing the wild-type receptor did. These findings suggest that the positively charged regions of membrane proteins that are asymmetrically distributed on the cytoplasmic surface of the membrane may be required for the functions of membrane proteins in general.     

Methyltransferase CheR binds to its chemoreceptor substrates independent of their signaling conformation yet modifies them differentially

Methylation of specific chemoreceptor glutamyl residues by methyltransferase CheR mediates sensory adaptation and gradient sensing in bacterial chemotaxis. Enzyme action is a function of chemoreceptor signaling conformation: kinase‐off receptors are more readily methylated than kinase‐on, a feature central to adaptational and gradient‐sensing mechanisms. Differential enzyme action could reflect differential binding, catalysis or both. We investigated by measuring CheR binding to kinase‐off and kinase‐on forms of Escherichia coli aspartate receptor Tar deleted of its CheR‐tethering, carboxyl terminus pentapeptide. This allowed characterization of the low‐affinity binding of enzyme to the substrate receptor body, otherwise masked by high‐affinity interaction with pentapeptide. We quantified the low‐affinity protein–protein interactions by determining kinetic rate constants of association and dissociation using bio‐layer interferometry and from those values calculating equilibrium constants. Whether Tar signaling conformations were shifted by ligand occupancy or adaptational modification, there was little or no difference between the two signaling conformations in kinetic or equilibrium parameters of enzyme‐receptor binding. Thus, differential methyltransferase action does not reflect differential binding. Instead, the predominant determinants of binding must be common to different signaling conformations. Characterization of the dependence of association rate constants on Deybe length, a measure of the influence of electrostatics, implicated electrostatic interactions as a common binding determinant. Taken together, our observations indicate that differential action of methyltransferase on kinase‐off and kinase‐on chemoreceptors is not the result of differential binding and suggest it reflects differential catalytic propensity. Differential catalysis rather than binding could well be central to other enzymes distinguishing alternative conformations of protein substrates.     

Exploring electrostatic interactions of relaxin family peptide receptor 3 and 4 with ligands using a NanoBiT-based binding assay

Relaxin family peptides perform a variety of biological functions by activating four G protein-coupled receptors, namely relaxin family peptide receptor 1-4 (RXFP1-4). We recently disclosed electrostatic interactions of the homologous RXFP3 and RXFP4 with some agonists based on activation complementation. However, this activation assay-based approach cannot be applied to antagonists that do not activate receptors. Herein, we propose a general approach suitable for both agonists and antagonists based on our newly-developed NanoBiT-based binding assay. We first validated the binding assay-based approach using the agonist relaxin-3, then applied it to the chimeric antagonist R3(ΔB23-27)R/I5. Three positively charged B-chain Arg residues of the agonist and antagonist were respectively replaced by a negatively charged Glu residue; meanwhile, the negatively charged Glu and Asp residue in the essential WxxExxxD motif of both receptors were respectively replaced by a positively charged Arg residue. Based on binding complementation of mutant ligands towards mutant receptors, we deduced possible electrostatic interactions of the agonist and antagonist with both RXFP3 and RXFP4: their B-chain C-terminal Arg residue interacts with the deeply buried Glu residue in the WxxExxxD motif of both receptors, and one or two of their B-chain central Arg residues interact with the shallowly buried Asp residue in the WxxExxxD motif of both receptors. Our present work shed new light on the interaction mechanism of RXFP3 and RXFP4 with agonists and antagonists, and also provided a novel approach for interaction studies of some plasma membrane receptors with their ligands.     

Chemotactic Adaptation Is Altered by Changes in the Carboxy-Terminal Sequence Conserved among the Major Methyl-Accepting Chemoreceptors

In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, methylation and demethylation of receptors are responsible for chemotactic adaptation and are catalyzed by the methyltransferase CheR and the methylesterase CheB, respectively. Among the chemoreceptors of these species, Tsr, Tar, and Tcp have a well-conserved carboxy-terminal motif (NWET/SF) that is absent in Trg and Tap. When they are expressed as sole chemoreceptors, Tsr, Tar, and Tcp support good adaptation, but Trg and Tap are poorly methylated and supported only weak adaptation. It was recently discovered that CheR binds to the NWETF sequence of Tsr in vitro. To examine the physiological significance of this binding, we characterized mutant receptors in which this pentapeptide sequence was altered. C-terminally-mutated Tar and Tcp expressed in a receptorless E. coli strain mediated responses to aspartate and citrate, respectively, but their adaptation abilities were severely impaired. Their expression levels and attractant-sensing abilities were similar to those of the wild-type receptors, but the methylation levels of the mutant receptors increased only slightly upon addition of attractants. When CheR was overproduced, both the adaptation and methylation profiles of the mutant Tar receptor became comparable to those of wild-type Tar. Furthermore, overproduction of CheR also enhanced adaptive methylation of wild-type Trg, which lacks the NWETF sequence, in the absence of any other chemoreceptor. These results suggest that the pentapeptide sequence facilitates effective adaptation and methylation by recruiting CheR.     

Allosteric enhancement of adaptational demethylation by a carboxyl-terminal sequence on chemoreceptors

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by covalent modification of chemoreceptors. Specific glutamyl residues are methylated and demethylated in reactions catalyzed by methyltransferase CheR and methylesterase CheB. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium, efficient adaptational modification by either enzyme is dependent on a conserved pentapeptide sequence at the chemoreceptor carboxyl terminus, a position distant from the sites of modification. For CheR-catalyzed methylation, previous work demonstrated that this sequence acts as a high affinity docking site, enhancing methylation by increasing enzyme concentration near methyl-accepting glutamates. We investigated pentapeptide-mediated enhancement of CheB-catalyzed demethylation and found it occurred by a distinctly different mechanism. Assays of binding between CheB and the pentapeptide sequence showed that it was too weak to have a significant effect on local enzyme concentration. Kinetic analyses revealed that interaction of the sequence and the methylesterase enhanced the rate constant of demethylation not the Michaelis constant. This allosteric activation occurred if the sequence was attached to chemoreceptor, but hardly at all if it was present as an isolated peptide. In addition, free peptide inhibited demethylation of the native receptor carrying the pentapeptide sequence at its carboxyl terminus. These observations imply that the allosteric change is transmitted through the protein substrate, not the enzyme.