Growth-phase-dependent gene expression profiling of poplar (Populus alba x Populus tremula var. glandulosa) suspension cells

Complex sequences of morphological and biochemical changes occur during the developmental course of a batch plant cell culture. However, little information is available about the changes in gene expression that could explain these changes, because of the difficulties involved in isolating specific cellular events or developmental phases in the overlapping phases of cell growth. In an attempt to obtain such information we have examined the global growth phase-dependent gene expression of poplar cells in suspension cultures by cDNA microarray analysis. Our results reveal that significant changes occur in the expression of genes with functions related to protein synthesis, cell cycling, hormonal responses and cell wall biosynthesis, as cultures progress from initiation to senescence, that are highly correlated with observed developmental and physiological changes in the cells. Genes encoding protein kinases, calmodulin and proteins involved in both ascorbate metabolism and water-limited stress responses also showed strong stage-specific expression patterns. Our report provides fundamental information on molecular mechanisms that control cellular changes throughout the developmental course of poplar cell cultures.     

Plant roots: recycled auxin energizes patterning and growth

Recent studies show that, in plant roots, mutually dependent regulatory mechanisms operating at cell and tissue levels interact to generate a self-sustaining distribution of the hormone auxin which provides a framework for developmental patterning and growth.     

The Actin Cytoskeleton and Signaling Network during Pollen Tube Tip Growth

The organization and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton play key roles in many aspects of plant cell development. The actin cytoskeleton responds to internal developmental cues and environmental signals and is involved in cell division, subcellular organelle movement, cell polarity and polar cell growth. The tipgrowing pollen tubes provide an ideal model system to investigate fundamental mechanisms of underlying polarized cell growth. In this system, most signaling cascades required for tip growth...     

Epithelial cell-turnover ensures robust coordination of tissue growth in Drosophila ribosomal protein mutants

Highly reproducible tissue development is achieved by robust, time-dependent coordination of cell proliferation and cell death. To study the mechanisms underlying robust tissue growth, we analyzed the developmental process of wing imaginal discs in Drosophila Minute mutants, a series of heterozygous mutants for a ribosomal protein gene. Minute animals show significant developmental delay during the larval period but develop into essentially normal flies, suggesting there exists a mechanism ensuring robust tissue growth during abnormally prolonged developmental time. Surprisingly, we found that both cell death and compensatory cell proliferation were dramatically increased in developing wing pouches of Minute animals. Blocking the cell-turnover by inhibiting cell death resulted in morphological defects, indicating the essential role of cell-turnover in Minute wing morphogenesis. Our analyses showed that Minute wing discs elevate Wg expression and JNK-mediated Dilp8 expression that causes developmental delay, both of which are necessary for the induction of cell-turnover. Furthermore, forced increase in Wg expression together with developmental delay caused by ecdysone depletion induced cell-turnover in the wing pouches of non-Minute animals. Our findings suggest a novel paradigm for robust coordination of tissue growth by cell-turnover, which is induced when developmental time axis is distorted.     

Lgl/aPKC and Crb regulate the Salvador/Warts/Hippo pathway

A key goal of developmental biology is to understand the mechanisms that coordinate organ growth. It has long been recognized that the genes that control apico-basal cell polarity also regulate tissue growth. How loss of cell polarity contributes to tissue overgrowth has been the subject of much speculation. Do loss-of-function mutations in cell polarity regulators result in secondary effects that globally deregulate cell proliferation, or do these genes specifically control growth pathways? Three recent papers have shown that the apico-basal polarity determinants Lgl/aPKC and Crb regulate tissue growth independently of their roles in cell polarity and coordinately regulate cell proliferation and cell death via the Salvador/Warts/Hippo (SWH) pathway. Lgl/aPKC are required for the correct localization of Hippo (Hpo)/Ras associated factor (RASSF), whilst Crb regulates the levels and localization of Expanded (Ex), indicating that cell polarity determinants modify SWH pathway activity by distinct mechanisms. Here, we review the key data that support these conclusions, highlight remaining questions and speculate on the underlying mechanisms by which the cell polarity complexes interact with the SWH pathway. Understanding the interactions between cell polarity regulators and the SWH pathway will improve our knowledge of how epithelial organization and tissue growth are coordinated during development and perturbed in disease states such as cancer.     

Plant development meets cell proliferation in Madrid.

Cell division is intimately intertwined with plant development, and the mechanisms that link the control of cell proliferation and differentiation with the processes of organogenesis, morphogenesis, and growth are starting to be understood. A recent Juan March meeting explored this interface, and revealed a rich seam of exciting work that is leading toward an integrated view of the role of cell proliferation in the unfolding of developmental programs.     

Size and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects

Among all organisms, the size of each body part or organ scales with overall body size, a phenomenon called allometry. The study of shape and form has attracted enormous interest from biologists, but the genetic, developmental and physiological mechanisms that control allometry and the proportional growth of parts have remained elusive. Recent progress in our understanding of body-size regulation provides a new synthetic framework for thinking about the mechanisms and the evolution of allometric scaling. In particular, insulin/IGF signaling, which plays major roles in longevity, diabetes and the regulation of cell, organ and body size, might also be centrally involved in regulating organismal shape. Here we review recent advances in the fields of growth regulation and endocrinology and use them to construct a developmental model of static allometry expression in insects. This model serves as the foundation for a research program that will result in a deeper understanding of the relationship between growth and form, a question that has fascinated biologists for centuries.     

Lgl/aPKC and Crb regulate the Salvador/Warts/Hippo pathway

A key goal of developmental biology is to understand the mechanisms that coordinate organ growth. It has long been recognized that the genes that control apico-basal cell polarity also regulate tissue growth. How loss of cell polarity contributes to tissue overgrowth has been the subject of much speculation. Do loss-of-function mutations in cell polarity regulators result in secondary effects that globally deregulate cell proliferation, or do these genes specifically control growth pathways? Three recent papers have shown that the apico-basal polarity determinants Lgl/aPKC and Crb regulate tissue growth independently of their roles in cell polarity and coordinately regulate cell proliferation and cell death via the Salvador/Warts/Hippo (SWH) pathway. Lgl/aPKC are required for the correct localization of Hippo (Hpo)/Ras associated factor (RASSF), while Crb regulates the levels and localization of Expanded (Ex), indicating that cell polarity determinants modify SWH pathway activity by distinct mechanisms. Here, we review the key data that support these conclusions, highlight remaining questions and speculate on the underlying mechanisms by which the cell polarity complexes interact with the SWH pathway. Understanding the interactions between cell polarity regulators and the SWH pathway will improve our knowledge of how epithelial organization and tissue growth are coordinated during development and perturbed in disease states such as cancer.Key words: Drosophila, tumor suppressor gene, cell polarity, Hippo pathway, Crb, Lgl, aPKC     

Developmental canalization with no part of stabilizing selection

Referring the developmental canalization to stabilizing selection may be a bias that results from the ignorance of developmental mechanisms. Considering the morphological evolution of one-cell trichomes in Draba plants makes it clear that the transition from continuous variation in morphological traits to developmental creods occurs in the evolution of remote lineages of the genus irrespective of contribution to the net fitness. Morphological diversification of trichome branching is not under selection control, being a physical consequence of the trichome cell volume growth equilibrated by complication of the cell surface shape. At the start of evolution, the trichome development refers not to an individual trichome, but rather to repetitive trichome modules (branches), whose spatiotemporal order is arbitrary, except that some variants of branching depend on events that occur at earlier developmental stages more than others. Under selection fluctuating at random, or with no selection at all, fixing of these variants leads to the formation of trichome ontogeny, in which earlier developmental stages correspond to later stages of developmental evolution.     

The cell cycle and development: lessons from C. elegans

The invariant developmental cell lineage of Caenorhabditis elegans (and other similar nematodes) provides one of the best examples of how cell division patterns can be precisely coordinated with cell fates. Although the field has made substantial progress towards elucidating the many factors that control the acquisition of individual cell or tissue-specific identities, the interplay between these determinants and core regulators of the cell cycle is just beginning to be understood. This review provides an overview of the known mechanisms that govern somatic cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation in C. elegans. In particular, I will focus on those studies that have uncovered novel genes or mechanisms, and which may enhance our understanding of corresponding processes in other organisms.     

The control of cell number during central nervous system development in flies and mice

Growth is confined within a size that is normal for each species, revealing that somehow an organism 'knows' when this size has been reached. Within a species, growth is also variable, but despite this, proportion and structure are maintained. Perhaps, the key element in the control of size is the control of cell number. Here we review current knowledge on the mechanisms controlling cell number in the nervous system of vertebrates and flies. During growth, clonal expansion is confined, the number of progeny cells is balanced through the control of cell survival and cell proliferation and excess cells are eliminated by apoptosis. Simultaneously, organ architecture emerges and as neurons become active they also influence growth. The interactive control of cell number provides developmental plasticity to nervous system development. Many findings are common between flies and mice, other aspects have been studied more in one organism than the other and there are also aspects that are unique to either organism. Although cell number control has long been studied in the nervous system, analogous mechanisms are likely to operate during the growth of other organs and organisms.     

Rheb is an essential regulator of S6K in controlling cell growth in Drosophila

Understanding the mechanisms through which multicellular organisms regulate cell, organ and body growth is of relevance to developmental biology and to research on growth-related diseases such as cancer. Here we describe a new effector in growth control, the small GTPase Rheb (Ras homologue enriched in brain). Mutations in the Drosophila melanogaster Rheb gene were isolated as growth-inhibitors, whereas overexpression of Rheb promoted cell growth. Our genetic and biochemical analyses suggest that Rheb functions downstream of the tumour suppressors Tsc1 (tuberous sclerosis 1)-Tsc2 in the TOR (target of rapamycin) signalling pathway to control growth, and that a major effector of Rheb function is ribosomal S6 kinase (S6K).     

The root endodermis: A hub of developmental signals and nutrient flow

The root endodermis is the cylindrical boundary that separates the inner vascular tissue from the outer cortex and functions as an apoplasmic barrier for selective nutrient uptake. Recent developmental and cell biological studies have started to reveal the mechanisms by which this single cell layer serves as a key regulatory module of root growth, tissue patterning and nutrient flow, which in concert support the plant’s ability to survive in a terrestrial habitat. This review provides an overview of the key factors that contribute to the functioning of the root endodermis and discusses how this single cell layer dictates root growth and tissue patterning.     

What is slow axonal transport?

While the phenomenon of slow axonal transport is widely agreed upon, its underlying mechanism has been controversial for decades. There is now persuasive evidence that several different mechanisms could contribute to slow axonal transport. Yet proponents of different theories have been hesitant to explicitly integrate what were, at least initially, opposing models. We suggest that slow transport is a multivariate phenomenon that arises through mechanisms that minimally include: molecular motor-based transport of polymers and soluble proteins as multi-protein complexes; diffusion; and en bloc transport of the axonal framework by low velocity transport and towed growth (due to increases in body size). In addition to integrating previously described mechanisms of transport, we further suggest that only a subset of transport modes operate in a given neuron depending on the region, length, species, cell type, and developmental stage. We believe that this multivariate approach to slow axonal transport better explains its complex phenomenology: including its bi-directionality; the differing velocities of transport depending on cargo, as well differing velocities due to anatomy, cell type and developmental stage.     

Cell proliferation and growth in C. elegans.

The cell division and differentiation events that occur during the development of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans are nearly identical between different individuals, a feature that distinguishes this organism from larger and more complex metazoans, such as humans and Drosophila. In view of this discrepancy, it might be expected that the regulation of cell growth, division and differentiation in C. elegans would involve mechanisms separate from those utilized in larger animals. However, the results of recent genetic, molecular and cellular studies indicate that C. elegans employs an arsenal of developmental regulatory mechanisms quite similar to those wielded by its arthropod and vertebrate relatives. Thus, the nematode system is providing both novel and complementary insights into the general problem of how growth and patterning events are integrated in development. This review offers a general perspective on the regulation of cell division and growth in C. elegans, emphasizing recent studies of these crucial aspects of development.     

Mechanisms of size control

The study of organ size control is a discipline of developmental biology that is largely unexplored. Although the size of an organ or organism depends largely on cell numbers and cell size, studies have found that the simple deregulation of cell proliferation or cell growth does not necessarily lead to changes in organ size. Recent genetic screens in Drosophila suggest that mutations that do affect organ size can be classified into three broad categories on the basis of their underlying effects: patterning, proliferation, and growth. Overall, experimental data suggest that organ size might be regulated by a 'total mass checkpoint' mechanism which functions to link the regulation of cell size and cell proliferation. The mechanisms of organ size control could also be critical targets for evolutionary events or disease processes such as tumorigenesis.