Signal transmission via G protein-coupled receptors in the light of rhodopsin structure determination

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transducing diverse external signals to cells via activation of heterotrimeric GTP-binding (G) proteins, estimated to mediate actions of 60% of drugs, had been resistant to structure determination until summer 2000. The first atomic-resolution experimental structure of a GPCR, that of dark (inactive) rhodopsin, thus provides a trustworthy 3D prototype for antagonist-bound forms of this huge family of proteins. In this work, our former theoretical GPCR models are evaluated against the new experimental template. Subsequently, a working hypothesis regarding the signal transduction mechanism by GPCRs is presented.     

Molecular interactions between the photoreceptor G protein and rhodopsin

1. The visual transduction system of the vertebrate retina is a well-studied model for biochemical and molecular studies of signal transduction. The structure and function of rhodopsin, a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor, and transducin or Gt, the photoreceptor G protein, have been particularly well studied. Mechanisms of rhodopsin-Gt interaction are discussed in this review. 2. The visual pigment rhodopsin contains a chromophore, and thus conformational changes leading to activation can be monitored spectroscopically. A model of the conformational changes in the activated receptor is presented based on biophysical and biochemical data. 3. The current information on sites of interaction on receptors and cognate G proteins is summarized. Studies using synthetic peptides from amino acid sequences corresponding to Gt and rhodopsin have provided information on the sites of rhodopsin-Gt interaction. Synthetic peptides from the carboxyl terminal region of alpha t mimic Gt by stabilizing the active conformation of rhodopsin, Metarhodopsin II. 4. The conformation of one such peptide when it is bound to Metarhodopsin II was determined by 2D NMR. The model based on the NMR data was tested using peptide analogs predicted to stabilize or break the structure. These studies yield molecular insight into why toxin-treated and mutant G proteins are uncoupled from receptors.     

Functional interaction between bovine rhodopsin and G protein transducin

To elucidate the mechanisms of specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with the G protein transducin (G(t)), we have constructed the bovine rhodopsin mutants whose second or third cytoplasmic loop (loop 2 or 3) was replaced with the corresponding loop of the G(o)-coupled scallop rhodopsin and investigated the difference in the activation abilities for G(t), G(o), and G(i) among these mutants and wild type. We have also prepared the Galpha(i) mutants whose C-terminal 11 or 5 amino acids were replaced with those of Galpha(t), Galpha(o), and Galpha(q) to evaluate the role of the C-terminal tail of the alpha-subunit on the specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with G(t). Replacement of loop 2 of bovine rhodopsin with that of the scallop rhodopsin caused about a 40% loss of G(t) and G(o) activation, whereas that of loop 3 enhanced the G(o) activation four times with a 60% decrease in the G(t) activation. These results indicated that loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is one of the regions responsible for the specific coupling with G(t). Loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin discriminates the difference of the 6-amino acid sequence (region A) at a position adjacent to the C-terminal 5 amino acids of the G protein, resulting in the different activation efficiency between G(t) and G(o). In addition, the binding of region A to loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is essential for activation of G(t) but not G(i), even though the sequence of the region A is almost identical between Galpha(t) and Galpha(i). These results suggest that the binding of loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin to region A in Galpha(t) is one of the mechanisms of specific G(t) activation by bovine rhodopsin.     

Phosphorylation modulates the affinity of light-activated rhodopsin for G protein and arrestin

Reduced effector activity and binding of arrestin are widely accepted consequences of GPCR phosphorylation. However, the effect of receptor multiphosphorylation on G protein activation and arrestin binding parameters has not previously been quantitatively examined. We have found receptor phosphorylation to alter both G protein and arrestin binding constants for light-activated rhodopsin in proportion to phosphorylation stoichiometry. Rod disk membranes containing different average receptor phosphorylation stoichiometries were combined with G protein or arrestin, and titrated with a series of brief light flashes. Binding of G(t) or arrestin to activated rhodopsin augmented the 390 nm MII optical absorption signal by stabilizing MII as MII.G or MII.Arr. The concentration of active arrestin or G(t) and the binding constant of each to MII were determined using a nonlinear least-squares (Simplex) reaction model analysis of the titration data. The binding affinity of phosphorylated MII for G(t) decreased while that for arrestin increased with each added phosphate. G(t) binds more tightly to MII at phosphorylation levels less than or equal to two phosphates per rhodopsin; at higher phosphorylation levels, arrestin binding is favored. However, arrestin was found to bind much more slowly than G(t) at all phosphorylation levels, perhaps allowing time for phosphorylation to gradually reduce receptor-G protein interaction before arrestin capping of rhodopsin. Sensitivity of the binding constants to ionic strength suggests that a strong membrane electrostatic component is involved in both the reduction of G(t) binding and the increase of arrestin binding with increasing rhodopsin phosphorylation.     

Cytoplasmic shuttling of protons in anabaena sensory rhodopsin: implications for signaling mechanism

It was found recently that Anabaena sensory rhodopsin (ASR), which possibly serves as a photoreceptor for chromatic adaptation, interacts with a soluble cytoplasmic transducer. The X-ray structure of the transducer-free protein revealed an extensive hydrogen-bonded network of amino acid residues and water molecules in the cytoplasmic half of ASR, in high contrast to its haloarchaeal counterparts. Using time-resolved spectroscopy of the wild-type and mutant ASR in the visible and infrared ranges, we tried to determine whether this hydrogen-bonded network is used to translocate protons and whether those proton transfers are important for interaction with the transducer. We found that the retinal Schiff base deprotonation, which occurs in the M intermediate of the photocycle of all-trans-ASR, results in protonation of Asp217 on the cytoplasmic side of the protein. The deprotonation of the Schiff base induces a conformational change of ASR observed through the perturbation of associated lipids. We suggest that the cytoplasmic shuttling of protons in the photocycle of all-trans-ASR and the ensuing conformational changes might activate the transducer. Consequently, the M intermediate may be the signaling state of ASR.     

Improvements in G protein-coupled receptor purification yield light stable rhodopsin crystals

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of transmembrane signaling proteins and are the target of approximately half of all therapeutic agents. Agonist ligands bind their cognate GPCRs stabilizing the active conformation that is competent to bind G proteins, thus initiating a cascade of intracellular signaling events leading to modification of the cell activity. Despite their biomedical importance, the only known GPCR crystal structures are those of inactive rhodopsin forms. In order to understand how GPCRs are able to transduce extracellular signals across the plasma membrane, it is critical to determine the structure of these receptors in their ligand-bound, active state. Here, we report a novel combination of purification procedures that allowed the crystallization of rhodopsin in two new crystal forms and can be applicable to the purification and crystallization of other membrane proteins. Importantly, these new crystals are stable upon photoactivation and the preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of both photoactivated and ground state rhodopsin crystals are also reported.     

Heterotrimeric G protein signaling: Getting inside the cell

Heterotrimeric G proteins have traditionally been thought to transduce signals at the plasma membrane. In this issue, Slessareva et al. (2006) now show that a G protein alpha subunit acts at the endosome to stimulate a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to help yeast respond to mating pheromones.     

Solution structure of human GAIP (Galpha interacting protein): a regulator of G protein signaling.

The solution structure of the human protein GAIP (Galpha interacting protein), a regulator of G protein signaling, has been determined by NMR techniques. Dipolar couplings of the oriented protein in two different liquid crystal media have been used in the structure calculation. The solution structure of GAIP is compared to the crystal structure of an homologous protein from rat (RGS4) complexed to the alpha-subunit of a G protein. Some of RGS4 residues involved in the Galpha-RGS binding interface have similar orientations in GAIP (free form), indicating that upon binding these residues do not suffer conformational rearrangements, and therefore, their role does not seem to be restricted to Galpha interaction but also to RGS folding and stability. We suggest that other structural differences between the two proteins may be related to the process of binding as well as to a distinct efficiency in their respective GTPase activating function.     

A concept for G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptor dimers: the transducin/rhodopsin interface.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous and essential in modulating virtually all physiological processes. These receptors share a similar structural design consisting of the seven-transmembrane alpha-helical segments. The active conformations of the receptors are stabilized by an agonist and couple to structurally highly conserved heterotrimeric G proteins. One of the most important unanswered questions is how GPCRs couple to their cognate G proteins. Phototransduction represents an excellent model system for understanding G protein signaling, owing to the high expression of rhodopsin in rod photoreceptors and the multidisciplinary experimental approaches used to study this GPCR. Here, we describe how a G protein (transducin) docks on to an oligomeric GPCR (rhodopsin), revealing structural details of this critical interface in the signal transduction process. This conceptual model takes into account recent structural information on the receptor and G protein, as well as oligomeric states of GPCRs.     

Visual ecology: coloured fruit is what the eye sees best

Trichromatic vision may have evolved as an aid to frugivory. This hypothesis is supported by the recent demonstration that the spatial characteristics of pictures containing fruit are particularly well matched to the abilities of the human visual system.     

Structural and functional protein network analyses predict novel signaling functions for rhodopsin

Orchestration of signaling, photoreceptor structural integrity, and maintenance needed for mammalian vision remain enigmatic. By integrating three proteomic data sets, literature mining, computational analyses, and structural information, we have generated a multiscale signal transduction network linked to the visual G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) rhodopsin, the major protein component of rod outer segments. This network was complemented by domain decomposition of protein–protein interactions and then qualified for mutually exclusive or mutually compatible interactions and ternary complex formation using structural data. The resulting information not only offers a comprehensive view of signal transduction induced by this GPCR but also suggests novel signaling routes to cytoskeleton dynamics and vesicular trafficking, predicting an important level of regulation through small GTPases. Further, it demonstrates a specific disease susceptibility of the core visual pathway due to the uniqueness of its components present mainly in the eye. As a comprehensive multiscale network, it can serve as a basis to elucidate the physiological principles of photoreceptor function, identify potential disease‐associated genes and proteins, and guide the development of therapies that target specific branches of the signaling pathway.     

Chemical modification of rhodopsin and its effect on regeneration and G protein activation

The studies reported are concerned with the functional consequences of the chemical modifications of the lysines and carboxyl-containing amino acids of bovine rhodopsin. The 10 non-active-site lysine residues of rhodopsin can be completely dimethylated and partially acetimidated (8-9 residues) with no loss in the ability of the proteins to activate the G protein when photolyzed or to regenerate with 11-cis-retinal. These modifications do not alter the net charge on the protein. Surprisingly, heavy acetylation of these lysines (eight to nine residues) with acetic anhydride, which neutralizes the positive charges of the lysine residues, yields a modified rhodopsin fully capable of activating the G protein and being regenerated. It is concluded that the non-active-site lysine residues of rhodopsin are not importantly and directly involved in interactions with the G protein during photolysis. However, this is not to say that they are unimportant in maintaining the tertiary structure of the protein because heavy modification of these residues by succinylation and trinitrophenylation produces proteins incapable of G protein activation, although the succinylated protein still regenerated. The active-site lysine of rhodopsin was readily modified and prevented from regenerating with 11-cis-retinal and with o-salicylaldehyde and o-phthalaldehyde/mercaptoethanol, two sterically similar aromatic aldehyde containing reagents which react by entirely different mechanisms. It is suggested that rhodopsin contains an aromatic binding site within its active-site region. Monoethylation, but not monomethylation, of the active-site lysine also prevented regeneration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The signaling pathway of rhodopsin

The signal-transduction mechanism of rhodopsin was studied by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the high-resolution, inactive structure in an explicit membrane environment. The simulations were employed to calculate equal-time correlations of the fluctuating interaction energy of residue pairs. The resulting interaction-correlation matrix was used to determine a network that couples retinal to the cytoplasmic interface, where transducin binds. Two highly conserved motifs, D(E)RY and NPxxY, were found to have strong interaction correlation with retinal. MD simulations with restraints on each transmembrane helix indicated that the major signal-transduction pathway involves the interdigitating side chains of helices VI and VII. The functional roles of specific residues were elucidated by the calculated effect of retinal isomerization from 11-cis to all-trans on the residue-residue interaction pattern. It is suggested that Glu134 may act as a "signal amplifier" and that Asp83 may introduce a threshold to prevent background noise from activating rhodopsin.     

Relationship between the G protein signaling and homologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors

Signaling and desensitization of G protein-coupled receptor are intimately related, and measuring them separately requires certain parameters that represent desensitization independently of signaling. In this study, we tested whether desensitization requires signaling in three different receptors, beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) in S49 lymphoma cells, alpha-factor pheromone receptor (Ste2p) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae LM102 cells, and dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) in HEK-293 cells. Agonist-induced beta-arrestin translocation to the plasma membrane or receptor sequestration was measured to estimate homologous desensitization. To separate the signaling and desensitization of beta2AR, which mediates stimulation of adenylyl cyclase, S49 lymphoma cys- cells that lack the alpha subunit of Gs were used. Stimulation of beta2AR in these cells failed to increase intracellular cAMP, but beta-arrestin translocation still occurred, suggesting that feedback from beta2AR signaling is not required for homologous desensitization to occur. Agonist-induced sequestration of the yeast Ste2p-L236R, which showed reduced signaling through G protein, was not different from that of wildtype Ste2p, suggesting that the receptor signaling and sequestration are not directly linked cellular events. Both G protein coupling and D3R signaling, measured as inhibition of cAMP production, were greatly enhanced by co-expression of exogenous alpha subunit of Go (Goalpha) or adenylyl cyclase type 5 (AC5), respectively. However, agonist-induced beta-arrestin translocation, receptor phosphorylation, and sequestration were not affected by co-expression of Galphao and AC5, suggesting that the extent of signaling does not determine desensitization intensity. Taken together, our results consistently suggest that G protein signaling and homologous desensitization are independent cellular processes.     

Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a template for cone visual pigments and other G protein-coupled receptors

The crystal structure of rhodopsin has provided the first three-dimensional molecular model for a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Alignment of the molecular model from the crystallographic structure with the helical axes seen in cryo-electron microscopic (cryo-EM) studies provides an opportunity to investigate the properties of the molecule as a function of orientation and location within the membrane. In addition, the structure provides a starting point for modeling and rational experimental approaches of the cone pigments, the GPCRs in cone cells responsible for color vision. Homology models of the cone pigments provide a means of understanding the roles of amino acid sequence differences that shift the absorption maximum of the retinal chromophore in the environments of different opsins.     

Polarity exchange at the interface of regulators of G protein signaling with G protein alpha-subunits

RGS proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for G protein alpha-subunits. This GAP activity is mediated by the interaction of conserved residues on regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins and Galpha-subunits. We mutated the important contact sites Glu-89, Asn-90, and Asn-130 in RGS16 to lysine, aspartate, and alanine, respectively. The interaction of RGS16 and its mutants with Galpha(t) and Galpha(i1) was studied. The GAP activities of RGS16N90D and RGS16N130A were strongly attenuated. RGS16E89K increased GTP hydrolysis of Galpha(i1) by a similar extent, but with an about 100-fold reduced affinity compared with non-mutated RGS16. As Glu-89 in RGS16 is interacting with Lys-210 in Galpha(i1), this lysine was changed to glutamate for compensation. Galpha(i1)K210E was insensitive to RGS16 but interacted with RGS16E89K. In rat uterine smooth muscle cells, wild type RGS16 abolished G(i)-mediated alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor signaling, whereas RGS16E89K was without effect. Both Galpha(i1) and Galpha(i1)K210E mimicked the effect of alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor stimulation. Galpha(i1)K210E was sensitive to RGS16E89K and 10-fold more potent than Galpha(i1). Analogous mutants of Galpha(q) (Galpha(q)K215E) and RGS4 (RGS4E87K) were created and studied in COS-7 cells. The activity of wild type Galpha(q) was counteracted by wild type RGS4 but not by RGS4E87K. The activity of Galpha(q)K215E was inhibited by RGS4E87K, whereas non-mutated RGS4 was ineffective. We conclude that mutation of a conserved lysine residue to glutamate in Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) family members renders these proteins insensitive to wild type RGS proteins. Nevertheless, they are sensitive to glutamate to lysine mutants of RGS proteins. Such mutant pairs will be helpful tools in analyzing Galpha-RGS specificities in living cells.     

Toll-like receptor signaling alters the expression of regulator of G protein signaling proteins in dendritic cells: implications for G protein-coupled receptor signaling

Conserved structural motifs on pathogens trigger pattern recognition receptors present on APCs such as dendritic cells (DCs). An important class of such receptors is the Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLR signaling triggers a cascade of events in DCs that includes modified chemokine and cytokine production, altered chemokine receptor expression, and changes in signaling through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). One mechanism by which TLR signaling could modify GPCR signaling is by altering the expression of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. In this study, we show that human monocyte-derived DCs constitutively express significant amounts of RGS2, RGS10, RGS14, RGS18, and RGS19, and much lower levels of RGS3 and RGS13. Engagement of TLR3 or TLR4 on monocyte-derived DCs induces RGS16 and RGS20, markedly increases RGS1 expression, and potently down-regulates RGS18 and RGS14 without modifying other RGS proteins. A similar pattern of Rgs protein expression occurred in immature bone marrow-derived mouse DCs stimulated to mature via TLR4 signaling. The changes in RGS18 and RGS1 expression are likely important for DC function, because both proteins inhibit G alpha(i)- and G alpha(q)-mediated signaling and can reduce CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)12-, CC chemokine ligand (CCL)19-, or CCL21-induced cell migration. Providing additional evidence, bone marrow-derived DCs from Rgs1(-/-) mice have a heightened migratory response to both CXCL12 and CCL19 when compared with similar DCs prepared from wild-type mice. These results indicate that the level and functional status of RGS proteins in DCs significantly impact their response to GPCR ligands such as chemokines.