Effect of chronic home care on admission to institutions providing long-term care.

Home care programs are operating throughout Ontario. In October 1975 pilot-test chronic home care (CHC) programs were added in three areas. Whether the Kingston CHC program prevented or delayed admission to an institution providing long-term care was studied in the 218 patients admitted to the program up to mid-March 1976. Forms were completed for all 218 patients admitted, for the 109 still in the program 6 months later, and for the 131 who had left the program by August 1976. Of the 218 patients 20% had applied for admission to an institution providing long-term care before applying for CHC, and another 22% had seriously considered applying to such an institution. The CHC staff judged that 61% would have needed institutional care without CHC. Only 12% of the 218 patients left the CHC program to enter an institution, only 1 of the 48 patients discharged to self-care at home was considering a move to an institution, and only 2 receiving CHC for 6 months applied to an institution during that time. CHC therefore seems to delay greatly admission to an institution providing long-term care for a substantial group of patients.     

One third of a million days of care at home, 1959 to 1975.

Although articles on studies of organized home care programs are numerous, reports of long-term effectiveness of these programs are scanty. While government spokesmen appear to advocate more widespread use of alternatives to hospitalization, there has been serious criticism of the efficiency and accomplishments of home care services. A medically oriented home care program in Saskatoon (population, less than 150 000) has grown steadily over a 16-year period and is now serving a daily average of 200 individuals. All patients have required "hospital-like care" at home and most have not ordinarily been sufficiently mobile during their time in the program to attend hospital outpatient services. Many have required "concentrated care" through daily visits of professional health personnel. The program is designed for the physically ill and disabled and is administered by the major teaching hospital in the city, although it provides services to the whole community. Over one third of the patients referred in recent years had been at home. Almost one half of the patients have undergone satisfactory rehabilitation at home. The program has also proven to be an acceptable alternative to long-term institutional care for the permanently seriously disabled, a large number of whom are elderly. The program has been able to operate at considerably less cost to the public than inpatient (hospital or institutional) services would have entailed.     

Correlates of dental visits among community‐residing Latino elders: a public health alert

doi:10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2009.00335.x
Correlates of dental visits among community‐residing Latino elders: a public health alert Objectives: To examine oral service utilisation in a probability sample of community‐residing Latino elders. Background: Older Latinos are at a potential increased risk of oral diseases, given their higher prevalence of co‐morbidities and lower rate of dental service utilisation. Methods: A prevalence survey was conducted among a random sample of Latino (largely Puerto Rican) elders (n = 205; mean age = 75.8; SD ± 5.3) in New York City during 2001–2002. A systematic random sample was drawn from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Beneficiary tape files. Current use of oral health services and self‐reported health conditions was obtained. Functional and cognitive impairment were assessed. Results: Less than half of the sample reported a dental visit in the previous year. The average time since the last dental visit was 54 months (SD ± 84.5). Last year dental visit compliers were more likely to be unmarried, living alone, with higher levels of education, fewer health conditions and less impairment with activities of daily living. In multivariate analyses, problem‐oriented behaviour, Medicaid beneficiary, education, living alone, chronic health conditions and mobility impairment explained 14% of the ‘time since last dental visit’ variance. Conclusions: Given that socio‐demographic and level of functioning determinants appear to influence the frequency of dental visits, a multilevel approach to oral health promotion is imperative.